论文

长期施肥对土壤微生物量及土壤酶活性的影响

展开
  • 1 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京 100081
    2 昆士兰大学土地和食品科学学院, 布里斯班 4072, 澳大利亚
    3 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 北京 100081
* E-mail: bqzhao@sohu.com
第一联系人:

本文在农业部植物营养与养分循环重点实验室完成

收稿日期: 2006-10-12

  录用日期: 2007-10-09

  网络出版日期: 2008-01-30

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(30471012);国家基础研究重大项目前期研究专项(2001CCB00800);国家基础研究重大项目前期研究专项(2003 CCB00300);中国农业科学院杰出人才基金项目

BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES AND ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY OF ARABLE SOILS AFFECTED BY LONG-TERM DIFFERENT FERTILIZATION SYSTEMS

Expand
  • 1Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    2School of Land and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
    3Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2006-10-12

  Accepted date: 2007-10-09

  Online published: 2008-01-30

摘要

该文以北京国家褐潮土土壤肥力与肥料效益长期监测基地的长期肥料定位试验为平台,研究了长期不同施肥制度对土壤的生物学特性及其土壤酶的影响。主要研究结果:长期撂荒土壤(15年)的有机质和全氮(TN)的含量、微生物量碳(SMB-C)和氮(SMB-N)、土壤的蔗糖酶、磷酸酶和脲酶活性以及SMB-C/SOC(土壤有机碳)和SMB-N/TN比值都高于种植作物的农田土壤;而其代谢商和容重值低于农田土壤。长期施肥的农田(NPK、NPKM、NPKS和NPKF),其土壤养分含量、微生物量碳和氮以及土壤蔗糖酶、磷酸酶和脲酶活性均高于不施肥的农田(CK);而小麦(Triticum aestivum)-玉米(Zea mays)→小麦-大豆(Glycine max)复种轮作(NPKF)的农田又高于长期复种连作(NPK)的农田;在施肥处理中(NPK、NPKM、NPKS和NPKF),长期化肥与有机肥配合施用的处理(NPKM)的土壤上述指标高于其它施肥处理(NPK、NPKS和NPKF),但其土壤的代谢商、pH值和容重值较低。

本文引用格式

刘恩科, 赵秉强, 李秀英, 姜瑞波, 李燕婷, Hwat Bing So . 长期施肥对土壤微生物量及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008 , 32(1) : 176 -182 . DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.020

Abstract

Aims Cropping practices and fertilizer/organic matter application affects the soil microbial growth and activity. In china, only few studies have been conducted on the influence of long-term fertilizer and organic matter with fertilizer application on the soil biological properties. Our objective was to study the changes in soil biological and biochemical characteristics under a long-term (15 years) field experiment involving fertility treatments (inorganic fertilizers and organic matter with fertilizers) and two crop rotation systems.
Methods In 1990, thirteen different treatments were established in the Drab Fluvo-aquic soil in Beijing for the long-term experiment. Six treatments were chosen in this study. Four were in a wheat-maize rotation receiving no fertilizer (CK), mineral fertilizers (NPK), mineral fertilizers plus farmyard manure (NPKM) and mineral fertilizers with maize straw incorporated (NPKS). One was in a wheat-maize/wheat-soybean rotation receiving NPK (NPKF). The other was abandoned arable land (CK0) growing weeds. The amount of chemical fertilizer per year was N 150 kg·hm-2, P2O5 75 kg·hm-2, K2O 45 kg·hm-2, manure 22.5 Mg·hm-2 and maize straw 2.25 Mg·hm-2. Established methods were used to analyze soil enzymes and soil physical and chemical characteristics. Analysis was done using an integrative method combining correlation and component analyses in SPSS.
Important findings The soil organic C (SOC) and total N (STN) content, microbial biomass C (SMB-C) & N (SMB-N), activities of soil invertase, phosphatase and urease, and the ratio of SMB-C/SOC and SMB-N/STN were found higher in long-term (15 years) abandoned arable land than those in cultivated arable land soils. However, the soil metabolic quotient, pH value and bulk density of fallow soil were lower than those in cultivated arable land soils. The soil nutrient concentration, microbial biomass C & N, activities of soil invertase, phosphatase and urease, were higher in treatments with fertilizer application (NPK, NPKM, NPKS and NPKF) compared to no fertilizer application treatment (CK). The above soil parameters were also found higher in wheat-maize/wheat-soybean rotation cropping system compared to continuous wheat-maize cropping system. Among the fertilizer application treatments (NPK, NPKM, NPKS and NPKF), NPKM had relative higher soil nutrient concentration, microbial biomass C & N, and enzyme activities compared to other fertilizer application treatments. However, the soil metabolic quotient, pH value and bulk density of NPKM were lower than them.

参考文献

[1] Bao SD (鲍士旦) (2000). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (土壤农化分析). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[2] Belay A, Claassens AS, Wehner FC (2002). Effect of direct nitrogen and potassium and residual phosphorus fertilizers on soil chemical properties, microbial components and maize yield under long-term crop rotation. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35, 420-427.
[3] de la Paz Jimenez M, de la Horra A, Pruzzo L, Palma RM (2002). Soil quality: a new index based on microbiological and biochemical parameters. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35, 302-306.
[4] Dilly O, Munch JC (1996). Microbial biomass content, basal respiration and enzyme activities during the course of decomposition of leaf litter in a black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn) forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28, 1073-1081.
[5] Dilly O, Munch JC (1998). Ratios between estimates of microbial biomass content and microbialactivity in soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27, 374-379.
[6] Doran JW, Sarrantonio M, Liebig MA (1996). Soil health and sustainability. Advances in Agronomy, 56, 1-54.
[7] Fu L, Cheng WX, Susfalk R (2002). Rhizospere respiration varies with plant species and phenology: a greenhouse pot experiment. Plant and Soil, 239, 133-140.
[8] Goyal S, Chander K, Mundra MC, Kapoor KK (1999). Influence of inorganic fertilizers and organic amendments on soil organic matter and soil microbial properties under tropical conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 29, 196-200.
[9] Guan SY (关松荫) (1986). Soil Enzyme and Study Method (土壤酶及其研究法). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[10] Joergensen RG, Mueller T (1996). The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: calibration of the kEC value. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28, 3-37.
[11] Kanchikerimath M, Singh D (2001). Soil organic matter and biological properties after 26 years of maize-wheat-cowpea cropping as affected by manure and fertilization in a Cambisol in semiarid region of India. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 86, 155-162.
[12] Kautz T, Wirth S, Ellmer F (2004). Microbial activity in a sandy arable soil is governed by the fertilization regime. European Journal of Soil Biology, 40, 87-94.
[13] Lovell RD, Jarvis SC, Bardgett RD (1995). Soil microbial biomass and activity in long-term grassland: effects of management changes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27, 969-975.
[14] Lu RK (鲁如坤) (2000). Analysis Methods of Soil Agro-Chemistry (土壤农业化学分析方法). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[15] Masto RE, Chhonkar PK, Singh D, Patra AK (2006). Changes in soil biological and biochemical characteristics in a long-term field trial on a sub-tropical inceptisol. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 1577-1582.
[16] Mersi W, Schinner F (1991). An improved and accurate method for determining the dehydrogenase activity of soils with iodonitrotetrazolium chloride. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 11, 216-220.
[17] Neilson JW, Pepper IL (1990). Soil respiration as an index of soil aeration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54, 428-432.
[18] Odum E (1985). Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. Biology Science, 35, 419-422.
[19] Plaza C, Hernández D, García-Gil JC, Polo A (2004). Microbial activity in pig slurry-amended soils under semiarid conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 1577-1585.
[20] Saggar S, Yeates GW, Shepherd TG (2001). Cultivation effects on soil biological properties, microfauna and organic matter dynamics in Eutric Gleysol and Gleyic Luvisol soils in New Zealand. Soil and Tillage Research, 58, 55-68.
[21] Sall SN, Masse D, Ndour NYB, Chotte JL (2006). Does cropping modify the decomposition function and the diversity of the soil microbial community of tropical fallow soil? Applied Soil Ecology, 31, 211-219.
[22] Sparling GP (1992). Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 30, 195-207.
[23] Sparling GP (1997). Soil microbial biomass, activity and nutrient cycling as indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst C, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR eds. Biological Indicators of Soil Health. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 97-120.
[24] Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 19, 703-707.
[25] Visser S, Parkinson D (1992). Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: soil microorganisms. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 7, 33-37.
[26] Xu YC (徐阳春), Shen QR (沈其荣), Ran W (冉伟) (2002). Effects of zero-tillage and application of manure on soil microbial biomass C, N and P after sixteen years of cropping. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 39, 89-96. (in Chinaese with English abstract)
文章导航

/