研究论文

藏锦鸡儿群落土壤资源空间异质性

展开
  • 1 内蒙古大学生命科学学院,呼和浩特 010021
    2 中美生态、能源及可持续性科学内蒙古研究中心,呼和浩特 010021
    3 南京大学生命科学学院,南京 210093

收稿日期: 2008-03-27

  录用日期: 2008-10-10

  网络出版日期: 2009-03-31

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(30660034);国家973计划子课题(2007CB106807);内蒙古自然科学基金重大项目(200408020501)

SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY OF SOIL RESOURCES OF CARAGANA TIBETICA COMMUNITY

Expand
  • 1School of Life Sciences, lnner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
    2Sino-US Center for Conservation, Energy and Sustainability Science in Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010021, China
    3School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received date: 2008-03-27

  Accepted date: 2008-10-10

  Online published: 2009-03-31

摘要

在内蒙古高原, 藏锦鸡儿(Caragana tibetica)群落分布在草原向荒漠的过渡带上, 在植被区划中常作为由草原进入荒漠的指示物种。藏锦鸡儿是一种旱生垫状矮灌木, 由于其垫状生物学特性, 在地表覆沙的生境中常形成较均匀的、非常醒目的灌丛沙堆。不同大小的灌丛沙堆可对应其不同的发育阶段, 选取不同大小的藏锦鸡儿灌丛沙堆, 划分成小、中、大3组, 小、中两组灌丛沙堆对应其发育阶段, 大沙堆组对应于稳定阶段, 通过测定沙堆间、沙堆内(顶部、中部)及沙堆下的土壤有机质(Soil organic matters, SOM)、全磷(Total phosphorus, TP)和土壤质量含水量(Mass water content of soil, Wm), 分析了藏锦鸡儿群落土壤资源的特点。结果显示, 随着沙堆的发育, 沙堆内和堆下0~20 cm处的土壤有机质、全磷和土壤质量含水量的平均含量呈递增趋势, 大沙堆、中沙堆及堆下0~20 cm处的土壤有机质、全磷和土壤质量含水量的平均含量均大于沙堆间, 小沙堆的土壤有机质、堆下0~20 cm的土壤全磷和质量含水量的平均含量大于沙堆间。不同大小的灌丛沙堆, 在垂直方向上, 土壤有机质、全磷含量基本均呈先增加后减少的趋势, 土壤质量含水量呈递减趋势; 在水平方向, 随着灌丛沙堆的发育, 土壤有机质、全磷和土壤质量含水量在同一部位的同一土层基本呈递增趋势; 不同大小的沙堆表层0~20 cm 处的土壤有机质由顶部、中部、沙堆间依次呈先增加后减小的趋势; 大沙堆和中沙堆的全磷由沙堆顶部、中部、沙堆间依次呈递减趋势, 而小沙堆土壤全磷呈先增加后减少的趋势。随着灌丛沙堆的发育, 藏锦鸡儿灌丛截获的植物残体量呈增加趋势。研究显示, 藏锦鸡儿在发育过程中形成“沃岛效应”, 这种效应不仅表现在沙堆内, 也表现在沙堆下, 同时也引起土壤有机质、全磷和土壤水分的空间异质性分布。

本文引用格式

张璞进, 杨劼, 宋炳煜, 赵利清, 清华 . 藏锦鸡儿群落土壤资源空间异质性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009 , 33(2) : 338 -346 . DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.02.011

Abstract

Aims Caragana tibetica is commonly found in the ecotone between desert steppe and desert of the Inner Mongolian Plateau. It is often used as an indicator species in vegetation regionalization. Due to its dwarf shrub characteristics C. tibetica can easily initiate nebkha (dune) formation in sand-covered habitats. The objective of the present study is to understand C. tibetica ecological adaptability by investigating soil heterogeneity of C. tibetica community.

Methods Nebkhas formed by C. tibetica were classified into three size groups. Small and medium nebkhas corresponded to a development stage, and large nebkhas represented a stable stage. Soil organic mater (SOM), total phosphorus (TP) and water content (Wm) were measured at the top each nebkha, in the middle of the nebkha slope, in the interspace between nebkhas, and under the nebkhas. We then also averaged these properties for each nebkha (mean of top and middle samples).

Important findings Average content of SOM, TP and Wm of nebkhas and the soil underlying them increased with nebkha age. For large and medium nebkhas and the soil underlying them these properties were higher than that in the interspaces between them. Average SOM of small nebkhas was higher than that in the interspace between them. However,average TP and Wm of the soil underlying small nebkhas were lower than in the interspace. At the top and middle of nebkhas of all sizes, SOM and TP first increased and then decreased vertically while Wm decreased gradually. Plant residues content captured by C. tibetica nebkhas increased gradually with nebkha development stage. We conclude that the “fertility island effect” formed inside and below nebkhas increases as nebkhas develop. At the same time, we found that spatial heterogeneity of SOM,TP and Wm is high.

参考文献

[1] Bao SD (鲍士旦) (2000). Analysis of Soil and Agricultural Chemistry(土壤农化分析). China Agricultural Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[2] Carner W, Steinberger A (1989). Proposed mechanism for the formation of “fertile islands” in the desert ecosystem. Journal of Arid Environments, 16,257-262.
[3] Charley JL, West NE (1975). Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. Journal of Ecology, 63,945-964.
[4] Comprehensive Survey Team of Inner Mongolia and Ningxia of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (中国科学院内蒙古宁夏综合考察队)(1985). Inner Mongolia Vegetation (内蒙古植被). Science Press, Beijing, 141-142. (in Chinese)
[5] Fisher FM, Zak JC, Cunningham GL, Whitford WG (1987). Water and nitrogen effect on growth and allocation patterns of creosotebush in the northern of Chihuahuas Desert. Journal of Range Management, 41,387-391.
[6] Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM (2001). Restoring heterogeneity on rangeland: ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. BioScience, 51,625-632.
[7] Huang CY (黄昌勇) (2000). Pedology (土壤学). China Agricultural Press, Beijing, 32-49. (in Chinese)
[8] Jia XH (贾晓红), Li XR (李新荣), Chen YW (陈应武) (2007). Soil properties of Nitraria land in southeastern Tengger Desert. Arid Land Geography (干旱区地理), 30,557-564. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] Li H, Reynolds JF (1995). On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos, 73,280-284.
[10] Li J (李君), Zhao CY (赵成义), Zhu H (朱宏), Wang F (王锋) (2007). Species effect of Tamarix spp. and Haloxylon ammodendron on shrub “fertile island”. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27,5138-5147. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Liu FM (刘发民), Jin Y (金燕), Zhang XJ (张小军) (1999). Preliminary study on “fertile island” effect about Haloxylon ammodendron. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与研究), 13,86-88. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Robertson GP, Crun JR, Ellis BG (1993). The spatial variability of soil resources following long-term disturbance. Oecologia, 96,451-456.
[13] Schlesinger WH, Raikes JA, Hartley AE, Cross AF (1996). On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology, 77,364-374.
[14] Schlesinner WH, Pilmanis AM (1998). Plant-soil interactions in deserts. Biogeochemistry, 42,169-187.
[15] Stock WD, Dlamini TS, Cowling RM (1999). Plant induced fertile islands as possible indicators of desertification in asucculent desert ecosystem in northern Namaqualand, South Africa. Plant Ecology, 142,161-167.
[16] Su JH (苏金华), Liu FY (刘福英), Wang L (王璐), Qi XJ (齐小娟), Zhao J (赵静) (2006). Conservation on biodiversity in enrichment zone with relict vegetations between farmland and grassland—a case study in Eerduosi. Journal of Agro-Environment Science (农业环境科学学报), 25(Suppl.),285-289.
[17] Tengberg A, Faso B (1998). A comparative analysis of nehkhas in central Tunisia and northern Burkina Faso. Geomorphology, 22,181-192.
[18] Virginia RA, Jarrell WM (1983). Soil properties in a mesquite-dominated Sonoran Desert ecosystem. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 47,138-144.
[19] Wezel A, Rajot JL, Herbrig C (2000). Influence of shrubs on soil characteristics and their function in Sahelian agro-ecosystems in semi-arid Niger. Journal of Arid Environments, 44,383-398.
[20] Whitford WG, Anderson J, Rice PM (1997). Stemflow contribution to the “fertile island”effects in creosote bush, Larrea tridentate. Journal of Arid Environments, 35,451-457.
[21] Xiong XG (熊小刚), Han XG (韩兴国) (2005). Spatial heterogeneity in soil carbon and nitrogen resources, caused by Caragana microphylla, in the thicketization of semiarid grassland, Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25,1678-1683. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] Xiong Y (熊毅), Li QK (李庆逵) (1987). Soil of China(中国土壤). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
文章导航

/