亚热带6个典型树种吸收细根寿命与形态属性格局
收稿日期: 2021-01-04
录用日期: 2021-03-08
网络出版日期: 2021-04-23
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(31822010);国家自然科学基金(31971633);中国科学院基础前沿科学研究计划“从0到1”原始创新项目(ZDBS-LY-DQC023)
Lifespan and morphological traits of absorptive fine roots across six typical tree species in subtropical China
Received date: 2021-01-04
Accepted date: 2021-03-08
Online published: 2021-04-23
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31822010);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31971633);“0-1” Original Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(ZDBS-LY-DQC023)
根周转是地下生态过程的主要驱动力, 根属性指征了物种生态策略, 根寿命与属性是理解生态系统碳氮循环和群落多样性的关键。目前对亚热带常绿阔叶林根周转等生态过程的直接观测资料缺乏。该研究对中亚热带江西樟树试验林场6个树种吸收细根动态进行了2年观测, 获取了2.8万张微根管照片, 分析了吸收细根寿命年际和季节变化特征及其与根形态属性的关系。结果显示: 1)亚热带6个树种间吸收细根寿命变异为4.6倍, 变异系数可达73%。中值寿命排序为: 红豆杉(Taxus wallichiana)(426天) >复羽叶栾树( Koelreuteria bipinnata)(155天) >竹柏( Nageia nagi)(145天) >樟( Cinnamomum camphora)(126天) >东京樱花( Cerasus yedoensis)(93天) >深山含笑( Michelia maudiae)(92天); 2)树木吸收细根寿命年际、季节变异较大, 可能是适应伏秋旱、雨热不同期、年际变化大的亚热带季风气候的结果; 3)吸收细根寿命与直径呈显著正相关关系, 与比根长呈显著负相关关系, 表明根的构建成本可以在一定程度上预测寿命。这些结果为预测亚热带地下生态过程、揭示亚热带常绿阔叶林碳氮循环、物种共存机制提供依据。
王奕丹, 李亮, 刘琪璟, 马泽清 . 亚热带6个典型树种吸收细根寿命与形态属性格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021 , 45(4) : 383 -393 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0001
Aims Root turnover is a primary driver of belowground ecological processes, and root functional traits can indicate species ecological strategies, hence root lifespan and morphological traits are essential for understanding ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycling as well as community diversity. Yet, data on root ecological processes in subtropical evergreen forest is very rare.
Methods We observed root dynamics of six tree species across root orders for two years in an experimental forest farm in Zhangshu, Jiangxi Province. Based on 28 000 minirhizotron photos, we analyzed interannual and seasonal changes of absorptive fine roots in relation to both lifespan and morphology.
Important findings 1) The variation of root lifespan among the six species in subtropical forest was as high as 4.6-fold, the variation of coefficient was 73%, with median lifespan in the sequence of: Taxus wallichiana(426 d) > Koelreuteria bipinnata (155 d) > Nageia nagi(145 d) > Cinnamomum camphora (126 d) > Cerasus yedoensis (93 d) > Michelia maudiae (92 d); 2) Absorptive fine root lifespan appeared remarkable in both seasonal and interannual variations, a pattern seemingly related to the monsoon climate which is characterized by summer-to- autumn drought and the supplies of soil water resources; 3) The lifespan of absorptive roots was positively associated with diameter, but negatively correlated with specific root length, suggesting that the root construction cost is a key predictor of lifespan. These results provide parameters for modeling belowground carbon and nitrogen cycling processes in subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest, and pave the way for exploring species coexistence mechanisms from belowground.
[1] | Abramoff RZ, Finzi AC (2015). Are above- and below-ground phenology in sync? New Phytologist, 205, 1054-1061. |
[2] | Aerts R (1995). The advantages of being evergreen. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 402-407. |
[3] | Bai WM, Zhou M, Fang Y, Zhang WH (2017). Differences in spatial and temporal root lifespan of three Stipa grasslands in northern China. Biogeochemistry, 132, 293-306. |
[4] | Bauhus J, Messier C (1999). Evaluation of fine root length and diameter measurements obtained using RHIZO image analysis. Agronomy Journal, 91, 142-147. |
[5] | Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Hendrick RL (2000). Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests. Oecologia, 125, 389-399. |
[6] | Comas LH, Bouma TJ, Eissenstat DM (2002). Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species. Oecologia, 132, 34-43. |
[7] | Comas LH, Callahan HS, Midford PE (2014). Patterns in root traits of woody species hosting arbuscular and ectomycorrhizas: implications for the evolution of belowground strategies. Evolutionary and Ecology, 4, 2979-2990. |
[8] | Comas LH, Eissenstat DM (2004). Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Functional Ecology, 18, 388-397. |
[9] | Courchesne DN, Wilson AZ, Ryser P (2020). Regional distribution patterns of wetland monocots with different root turnover strategies are associated with local variation in soil temperature. New Phytologist, 226, 86-97. |
[10] | Eissenstat DM (1997). Trade-offs in root form and function //Jackson LE. Ecology in Agriculture. Academic Press, San Diego,USA. 173-199. |
[11] | Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD, Whitbeck JL (2000). Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity. New Phytologist, 147, 33-42. |
[12] | Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (1997). The ecology of root lifespan. Advances in Ecological Research, 27, 1-60. |
[13] | Fan PP, Guo DL (2010). Slow decomposition of lower order roots: a key mechanism of root carbon and nutrient retention in the soil. Oecologia, 163, 509-515. |
[14] | Freschet GT, Cornelissen JHC, van Logtestijn RSP, Aerts R (2010). Evidence of the “plant economics spectrum” in a subarctic flora. Journal of Ecology, 98, 362-373. |
[15] | Gaudinski J, Trumbore S, Davidson E, Cook A, Markewitz D, Richter D (2001). The age of fine-root carbon in three forests of the eastern United States measured by radiocarbon. Oecologia, 129, 420-429. |
[16] | Gordon WS, Jackson RB (2000). Nutrient concentrations in fine roots. Ecology, 81, 275-280. |
[17] | Gu JC, Wang Y, Fahey TJ, Wang ZQ (2017). Effects of root diameter, branch order, soil depth and season of birth on fine root life span in five temperate tree species. European Journal of Forest Research, 136, 727-738. |
[18] | Guo DL, Li H, Mitchell RJ, Han WX, Hendricks JJ, Fahey TJ, Hendrick RL (2008a). Fine root heterogeneity by branch order: exploring the discrepancy in root turnover estimates between minirhizotron and carbon isotopic methods. New Phytologist, 177, 443-456. |
[19] | Guo DL, Xia MX, Wei X, Chang WJ, Liu Y, Wang ZQ (2008b). Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytologist, 180, 673-683. |
[20] | Hansson K, Helmisaari HS, Sah SP, Lange H (2013). Fine root production and turnover of tree and understorey vegetation in Scots pine, silver birch and Norway spruce stands in SW Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 309, 58-65. |
[21] | Huang JX, Ling H, Yang ZJ, Lu ZL, Xiong DC, Chen GS, Yang YS ( 2012). Fine root longevity and controlling factors in subtropical Altingia grlilipes and Castanopsis carlesii forests . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32, 1932-1942. |
[21] | [ 黄锦学, 凌华, 杨智杰, 卢正立, 熊德成, 陈光水, 杨玉盛 ( 2012). 细柄阿丁枫和米槠细根寿命影响因素. 生态学报, 32, 1932-1942.] |
[22] | Huo CF, Cheng WX (2019). Improved root turnover assessment using field scanning rhizotrons with branch order analysis. Ecosphere, 10, e02793. DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2793. |
[23] | Iversen CM (2014). Using root form to improve our understanding of root function. New Phytologist, 203, 707-709. |
[24] | Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997). A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 7362-7366. |
[25] | Kajimoto T (2010). Root system development of larch trees growing on siberian permafrost. Permafrost Ecosystems, 209, 303-330. |
[26] | Kong DL, Ma CG, Zhang Q, Li L, Chen XY, Zeng H, Guo DL (2014). Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. New Phytologist, 203, 863-872. |
[27] | Liljeroth E, Bryngelsson T (2001). DNA fragmentation in cereal roots indicative of programmed root cortical cell death. Physiologia Plantarum, 111, 365-372. |
[28] | Ling H, Yuan YD, Yang ZJ, Huang JX, Chen GS, Yang YS ( 2011). Influencing factors of fine root lifespans in two Chinese fir plantations in subtropical China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 1130-1138. |
[28] | [ 凌华, 袁一丁, 杨智杰, 黄锦学, 陈光水, 杨玉盛 ( 2011). 杉木人工林细根寿命的影响因素. 生态学报, 31, 1130-1138.] |
[29] | Liu BT, Li HB, Zhu B, Koide RT, Eissenstat DM, Guo DL (2015). Complementarity in nutrient foraging strategies of absorptive fine roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi across 14 coexisting subtropical tree species. New Phytologist, 208, 125-136. |
[30] | Liu XJ, Trogisch S, He JS, Niklaus PA, Bruelheide H, Tang ZY, Erfmeier A, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Pietsch KA, Yang B, Kühn P, Scholten T, Huang YY, Wang C, Staab M, Leppert KN, Wirth C, Schmid B, Ma KP (2018). Tree species richness increases ecosystem carbon storage in subtropical forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285, 1240. |
[31] | Ma ZQ, Guo DL, Xu XL, Lu MZ, Bardgett RD, Eissenstat DM, McCormack ML, Hedin LO (2018). Evolutionary history resolves global organization of root functional traits. Nature, 555, 94-97. |
[32] | Majdi H, Damm E, Nylund JE (2001). Longevity of mycorrhizal roots depends on branching order and nutrient availability. New Phytologist, 150, 195-202. |
[33] | McCormack ML, Adams TS, Smithwick EAH, Eissenstat DM (2012). Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees. New Phytologist, 195, 823-831. |
[34] | McCormack ML, Dickie IA, Eissenstat DM, Fahey TJ, Fernandez CW, Guo DL, Helmisaari HS, Hobbie EA, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Norby RJ, Phillips RP, Pregitzer KS, Pritchard SG, Rewald B, Zadworny M (2015). Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytologist, 207, 505-518. |
[35] | McCormack ML, Guo DL (2014). Impacts of environmental factors on fine root lifespan. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 205. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00205. |
[36] | Niinemets Ü, Ostonen I (2020). Plant organ senescence above- and belowground in trees: How to best salvage resources for new growth? Tree Physiology, 40, 981-986. |
[37] | Norby RJ, Ledford J, Reilly CD, Miller NE, O’Neill EG (2004). Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 9689-9693. |
[38] | Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012). Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist, 193, 30-50. |
[39] | Pregitzer KS, DeForest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002). Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecological Monographs, 72, 293-309. |
[40] | Radville L, McCormack ML, Post E, Eissenstat DM (2016). Root phenology in a changing climate. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, 3617-3628. |
[41] | Reich PB (2014). The world-wide “fast-slow” plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology, 102, 275-301. |
[42] | Roumet C, Urcelay C, Díaz S (2006). Suites of root traits differ between annual and perennial species growing in the field. New Phytologist, 170, 357-368. |
[43] | Ryser P (1996). The importance of tissue density for growth and life span of leaves and roots: a comparison of five ecologically contrasting grasses. Functional Ecology, 10, 717. |
[44] | Sun K, McCormack ML, Li L, Ma ZQ, Guo DL (2016). Fast-cycling unit of root turnover in perennial herbaceous plants in a cold temperate ecosystem. Scientific Reports, 6, 19698. DOI: 10.1038/srep19698. |
[45] | Tierney GL, Fahey TJ (2001). Evaluating minirhizotron estimates of fine root longevity and production in the forest floor of a temperate broadleaf forest. Plant and Soil, 229, 167-176. |
[46] | Warren JM, Hanson PJ, Iversen CM, Kumar J, Walker AP, Wullschleger SD (2015). Root structural and functional dynamics in terrestrial biosphere models: evaluation and recommendations. New Phytologist, 205, 59-78. |
[47] | Weemstra M, Kiorapostolou N, van Ruijven J, Mommer L, de Vries J, Sterck F (2020). The role of fine-root mass, specific root length and life span in tree performance: a whole-tree exploration. Functional Ecology, 34, 575-585. |
[48] | Weemstra M, Mommer L, Visser EJW, van Ruijven J, Kuyper TW, Mohren GMJ, Sterck FJ (2016). Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review. New Phytologist, 211, 1159-1169. |
[49] | Wells CE, Glenn DM, Eissenstat DM (2002). Changes in the risk of fine-root mortality with age: a case study in peach, Prunus persica (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 89, 79-87. |
[50] | Withington JM, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Eissenstat DM (2006). Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees. Ecological Monographs, 76, 381-397. |
[51] | Wu C, Wang ZQ, Fan ZQ ( 2004). Significance of senescence study on tree roots and its advances. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 15, 1276-1280. |
[51] | [ 吴楚, 王政权, 范志强 ( 2004). 树木根系衰老研究的意义与现状. 应用生态学报, 15, 1276-1280.] |
[52] | Xia MX, Guo DL, Pregitzer KS (2010). Ephemeral root modules in Fraxinus mandshurica. New Phytologist, 188, 1065-1074. |
[53] | Yu GR, Chen Z, Piao SL, Peng CH, Ciais P, Wang QF, Li XR, Zhu XJ (2014). High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 4910-4915. |
[54] | Yu SQ, Wang JB, Hao QW, Wang WF, Wang Q, Zhan LF ( 2020). Fine root lifespan and influencing factors of four tree species with different life forms. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40, 3040-3047. |
[54] | [ 于水强, 王静波, 郝倩葳, 王维枫, 王琪, 詹龙飞 ( 2020). 四种不同生活型树种细根寿命及影响因素. 生态学报, 40, 3040-3047.] |
[55] | Zadworny M, McCormack ML, Żytkowiak R, Karolewski P, Mucha J, Oleksyn J (2017). Patterns of structural and defense investments in fine roots of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) across a strong temperature and latitudinal gradient in Europe. Global Change Biology, 23, 1218-1231. |
[56] | Zheng JX, Huang JX, Wang ZZ, Xiong DC, Yang ZJ, Chen GS ( 2012). Fine root longevity and controlling factors in aPhoebe bournei plantation . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32, 7532-7539. |
[56] | [ 郑金兴, 黄锦学, 王珍珍, 熊德成, 杨智杰, 陈光水 ( 2012). 闽楠人工林细根寿命及其影响因素. 生态学报, 32, 7532-7539.] |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |