Original article

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK AND ITS APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Expand
  • 1 Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
    2 Rice Research Institute, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
* E-mail: makp@brim.ac.cn

Received date: 2004-07-15

  Accepted date: 2005-03-20

  Online published: 2005-08-30

Abstract

Artificial neural network appeals to many ecologists because of the complexity of agroecological systems and its precise predicting ability to simulate vaguely understood and highly uncertain ecosystems. We focus on the introduction of the structure, algorithm and the applications for back-propagation artificial neural network (BPN) in this paper. People usually adopt BPN of a three-layer structure that can approximate functions of any complexity and is not easy to overfit because of its simple structure. The main principle of back-propagation artificial neural network is to adjust weights according to the errors of input neurons. In agroecological research, neural networks are always employed to predict crop yield, biomass yield, relationships between organisms and environmental factors and so on. Previous studies indicate that neural networks greatly outperform linear models, while the accuracy of the results produced by neural networks are very similar to that of algorithmic models. Moreover, neural networks can extrapolate to some degree when enough training data are provided. However, neural networks require a large number of samples to guarantee the robustness of its parameterization, which seems unrealistic for complicated networks to collect such large data sets from crop growth experiments involving countless small plot trials over multiple site-years. The requirement of large amount of training data has hindered the application of neural networks. Some techniques, such as early stopping, jittering and metamodels, have been advanced to induce generalization of neural networks, while techniques such as Garson's algorithm, sensitivity analysis and randomization test are advanced to explain the mechanisms of neural networks. The advantage of neural network lies on its ability to precisely simulate the vaguely understood and uncertain ecosystems, which cannot be realized by traditional approaches. As a nonlinear approximator, artificial neural network is an important tool complementary to comprehensive models.

Cite this article

MI Xiang-Cheng, MA Ke-Ping, ZOU Ying-Bin . ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK AND ITS APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005 , 29(5) : 863 -870 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0114

References

[1] Broner I, Comstock CR (1997). Combining expert systems and neural networks for learning site-specific conditions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 19,37-53.
[2] Corne SA, Carver SJ, Kunin WE, Lennon JJ, van Hees WWS (2004). Predicting forest attributes in southeast Alaska using artificial neural networks. Forest Science, 50,59-276.
[3] Demuth H, Beale M (2001). Neural Network Toolbox for Use with MATLAB. Natick, the MathWorks, Inc.
[4] Garson GD (1991). Interpreting neural-network connection weights. Artificial Intelligence and Expert System, 6,47-51.
[5] Goh AT (1995). Back-propagation neural networks for modelling complex systems. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 9,143-151.
[6] James FC, McCulloch CE (1990). Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: pannacea or Pandora's box? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21,129-196.
[7] Kavdir I (2004). Discrimination of sunflower, weed and soil by artificial neural networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 44,153-160.
[8] Lee JHW, Huang Y, Dickman M, Jayawardena AW (2003). Neural network modelling of coastal algal blooms. Ecological Modelling, 159,179-201.
[9] Lek S, Beland A, Dimopoulos I, Lauga J, Moreau J (1995). Improved estimation, using networks of the food consumption of fish populations. Marine Freshwater Research, 46,1229-1236.
[10] Lek S, Delacoste M, Baran P, Dimopoulos I, Lauga J, Aulagnier S (1996). Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 90,39-52.
[11] Lek S, Guégan JF (1999). Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modeling: an introduction. Ecological Modelling, 120,65-73.
[12] Mi XC, Zou YB, Wei W, Ma KP (2005). Testing the generalization of artificial neural networks with cross validation and independent validation in modelling rice tillering dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 181,493-508.
[13] Moisen GG, Frescino TS (2002). Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics. Ecological Modelling, 157,209-225.
[14] Olden JD, Jackson DA (2002). Illuminating the "black box": a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecological Modelling, 154,135-150.
[15] Olden JD, Joy MK, Death RG (2004). An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecological Modelling, 178,389-397.
[16] ?zesmi SL, ?zesmi U (1999). An artificial neural network approach to spatial habitat modeling with interspecific interaction. Ecological Modelling, 116,15-31.
[17] Park YS, Cereghino R, Compin A, Lek S (2003). Applications of artificial neural networks for patterning and predicting aquatic insect species richness in running waters. Ecological Modelling, 160,265-280.
[18] Ryan M, Muller C, Di HJ, Cameron KC (2004). The use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to simulate N2O emissions from a temperate grassland ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 175,189-194.
[19] Scardi M (2001). Advances in neural network modelling of phytoplankton primary production. Ecological Modelling, 146,33-45.
[20] Schultz A, Wieland R (1997). The use of neural networks in agroecological modelling. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 18,73-90.
[21] Schultz A, Wieland R, Lutze G (2000). Neural networks in agroecological modelling -stylish application or helpful tool? Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 29,73-97.
[22] Segurado P, Araújo MB (2004). An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions. Journal of Biogeography, 31,1555-1568.
[23] Starrett SK, Najjar Y, Adams G (1998). Modeling pesticide leaching from golf courses using artificial neural networks. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29,3093-3106.
[24] Tamari S, Wosten JHM, Ruiz SJC (1996). Testing an artificial neural network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60,1732-1741.
[25] ter Braak CJF (1986). Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67,1167-1179.
[26] van Wijk MT, Bouten W, Verstraten JM (2002). Comparison of different modelling strategies for simulating gas exchange of a Douglas-fir forest. Ecological Modelling, 158,63-81.
[27] Viotti P, Liuti G, Di Genova P (2002). Atmospheric urban pollution: applications of an artificial neural network (ANN) to the city of Perugia. Ecological Modelling, 148,27-46.
[28] Wang YN (王耀南) (1999). Computational Intelligent Information Processing: Technology and Applications (计算机智能信息处理技术及其应用). Hunan University Press, Changsha,30-155. (in Chinese)
[29] Wolf ED, Francl LJ (1998). Empirical infection period models for tan spot of wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 20,394-395.
Outlines

/