Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology >
INTRASPECFIC AND INTERSPECFIC COMPETITION OF ARTEMISIA SCOPARIA UNDER DIFFERENT SITE CONDITIONS IN THE HILLY REGION OF LOESS PLATEAU
Received date: 2005-01-06
Accepted date: 2005-11-17
Online published: 2006-07-30
Background and Aims In hilly Loess region, Artemisia scoparia is always the dominator in the early abandoned field communities. It may be replaced by Agropyron cristatum or Heteropappus altaicus or Stipa bungeana in next succession stage when no disturbance occurs. In order to study the direction of Artemisia scoparia community succession under different standing conditions, we conducted transplant experiments to test the intraspecfic and interspecfic competition of Artemisia scoparia in river terrace and northern mound land and, at the same time, its morphological traits were investigated.
Methods In the experiments, nine species (three coexisting species, five later sere species and Artemisia scoparia itself) were chosen and transplanted as test species, but due to the low survival of two species, only seven species were analyzed to test the relative competition ability to phytometer Artemisia scoparia under different standing conditions.
Key Results The results show that the individuals tend to be miniaturized, i.e., its communities are composed mainly of small-sized individuals and competition can change the morphological traits. The unit biomass competition intensity is better than total competition intensity in explaining plants' relative competitive ability when local conditions and plant size are considered. Under the northern mound land and the lowest river terrace, late-successional and perennials species have higher competitative ability than early-successional and annual plants, suggesting that the competition of late- against early-successional species is one of the driving force to succession. Comparison of the competition between the seven test species and the unit biomass of Artemisia scoparia, the northern mound land ranks the first, lower river terrace the second and the lowest terrace the third, suggesting that intensive competition occurs more severely in poor growing conditions. There is significant difference in the ability of competition between the test species and Artemisia scoparia from the lowest river terrace to the northern mound land, suggesting that the ranks of the competition ability may vary depending on standing conditions.
Conclusions As competition is one of the decisive factors in constructing plant community, the shift or variation of competition ability between coexisting species and sere species may result in different community structure and dynamics, so it changes the direction and pathway of succession under different standing conditions.
DU Feng, LIANG Zong-Suo, SHAN Lun, CHEN Xiao-Yan . INTRASPECFIC AND INTERSPECFIC COMPETITION OF ARTEMISIA SCOPARIA UNDER DIFFERENT SITE CONDITIONS IN THE HILLY REGION OF LOESS PLATEAU[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006 , 30(4) : 601 -609 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0079
| [1] | Aerts R (1999). Interspecfic competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50, 29-37. |
| [2] | Aguiar MR, Lauenroth WK, Peters DP (2001). Intensity of intra- and interspecific competition in coexisting shortgrass species. Journal of Ecology, 89, 40-47. |
| [3] | Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1990). Ecology, Individuals, Populations and Communities 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. |
| [4] | Cahill JF, Casper BB (2000). Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowground. Oikos, 90, 311-320. |
| [5] | Casper BB, Jackson RB (1997). Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 545-570. |
| [6] | Cheng ZH (2001). Growth and Competition of Fourteen Herb species in Experimental Microcoenosiums. Acta Botanica Sinica(植物学报), 43, 1184-1190. |
| [7] | Crawley MJ, May RM(1987). Population dynamics and plant community structure: competition between annuals and perennials. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 125, 475-489. |
| [8] | Davies W (1928). The factor of competition between one species and another in seeds mixtures. In: Welsh Plant Breeding Station ed. Bulletin H8. Aberystwyth, 82-149. |
| [9] | Du F( 杜峰), Liang ZS( 梁宗锁), Hu LJ ( 胡莉娟) (2004). A reviews on plant competition. Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 23(4), 157-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [10] | Firbank LG, Watkinson AR(1990). On the effects of competition: from monocultures to mixtures. In: Grace JB, Tilman D eds. Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, New York, 165-192. |
| [11] | Fowler N (1986). The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 89-110. |
| [12] | Goldberg DE (1990). Components of resources in plant communities. In: Grace JB, Tilman D eds. Perspectives on the Plant Competition. Academic Press, New York, 27-49. |
| [13] | Goldberg DE (1996). Competitive ability: definitions contingency and correlated traits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 351, 1377-1385. |
| [14] | Grace JB (1989). Effects of water depth on Typha latifolia and Typha domingensis. American Journal of Botany, 76, 762-768. |
| [15] | Grace JB (1995). On the measurement of plant competition intensity. Ecology, 76, 305-308. |
| [16] | Hamilton JG, Holzapfel C, Mahall BE (1999). Coexistence and interference between a native perennial grass and non-native annaul grasses in California. Oecologia, 121, 518-526. |
| [17] | Howard TG (2001). The relationship of total and per-gram rankings in competitive effect to the natural abundance of herbaceous perennials. Journal of Ecology, 89, 110-117. |
| [18] | Keddy P, Nielsen K, Weiher E, Lawson R (2002). Relative competitive performance of 63 species of terrestrial herbaceous plants. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13, 5-16. |
| [19] | Leuschner C, Hertel D, Coners H, Büttner V (2001). Root competition between beech an oak:a hypothesis. Oecologia, 126, 276-284. |
| [20] | Li B( 李博), Chen JK( 陈家宽), Watkinson AR (1998). A literature review on plant competition. Chinese Buttetin of Botany(植物学通报), 15(4), 18-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [21] | Li B( 李博) (2001). Plant Competition—Studies on the Interactions Between Crop and Weed. Higher Education Press and Springer Press, Beijing, 251. (in Chinese) |
| [22] | Li ZF( 李仲芳), Wang G( 王刚) (2002). The effects of intraspecific competition on the relationship between height growth and biomass of annual plants. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences)(兰州大学学报(自然科学版)), 38(2), 141-146. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [23] | Martin RA, William KL, Debrap PP (2001). Intensity of intra- and interspecific competition in coexisting shortgrass species. Journal of Ecology, 89, 40-47. |
| [24] | Miller TE, Werner PA(1987). Competitive effects and response between plant species in a first year old-field community. Ecology, 68, 1201-1210. |
| [25] | Negbi M, Evenari M(1961). The means of survival of some desert summer annuals. In: Plant-Water Relationships in Arid and Semiarid Conditions. UNESCO, Paris, 249. |
| [26] | Rees M, Bergelson J(1997). Asymmetric light competition and founder control in plant communities. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 184, 353-358. |
| [27] | Rees M, Condit R, Crawley M, Pacala S, Tilman D(2001). Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science, 293, 650-655. |
| [28] | Sharitz RR, McCormick JF(1973). Population dynamics of two competition plant annual species. Ecology, 54, 723-740. |
| [29] | Spillards DM(1989). Studies of Plant Competition. PhD dissertation, University of East Anglia, Norwic. |
| [30] | Tang QY( 唐启义), Feng MG ( 冯明光) (1997). Practical Statistics and DPS Data Processing System. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, 407. (in Chinese) |
| [31] | Tielb?rger K, Kadmon R(2000). Indirect effects in a desert plant community: is competition among annuals more intense under shrub canopies? Plant Ecology, 150, 53-63. |
| [32] | Tilman D(1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. |
| [33] | Tilman D(1988). Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and the Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. |
| [34] | Turner MD, Rabinowitz D(1983). Factors affecting frequency distributions of plant mass: the absence of dominance and suppression in competing monocultures of Festuca paradoxa. Ecology, 64, 469-475. |
| [35] | Wang ZQ( 王政权), Wu GS( 吴巩胜), Wang JB( 王军邦)(2000). Application of competition index in assessing intraspecfic and interspecfic spatial relations between manchurian ash and dahurian larch. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 11, 641-645.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [36] | Weiner J, Thomas SC(1986). Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos, 47, 211-222. |
| [37] | Weiner J, Thomas SC (1992). Competition and allometry in three species of annual plants. Ecology, 73, 648-656. |
| [38] | Wichmann L(2001). Annual variations in competition symmetry in even-aged sitka spruce. Annals of Botany, 88, 145-151. |
| [39] | Zhang ZP( 张泽浦), Fang JY( 方精云), Kan M(2000). Effects of competition on growth rate and probability of death of plant individuals: a study based on nursery experiments of Larix leptolepis populations. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 24, 340-345. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [40] | Zou CJ( 邹春静), Xu WD( 徐文铎)(1998). Study on intraspecific and interspecfic competition of Picea mongolica. Acta Phytoecologfca Sinica (植物生态学报), 22, 269-274. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |