Research Articles

Effects of changing precipitation patterns on seedlings of Stipa grandis, a dominant plant of typical grassland of Inner Mongolia, China

Expand
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
    2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2010-05-11

  Accepted date: 2010-06-23

  Online published: 2010-10-31

Abstract

Aims Stipa grandis is a dominant species of Inner Mongolia typical grassland. Our objective is to explore the responses of S. grandis seedlings to changed precipitation patterns to provide insight into responses of Inner Mongolia grassland to future global climate change.

Methods A simulated experiment was conducted in 2009 to examine the effects of precipitation quantity and interval on S. grandis seedlings in open-top chambers at the Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Important findings At final harvest, aboveground biomass of S. grandis seedlings was significantly increased by an average of 23% (p < 0.05) by increased precipitation quantity (+50%) and by an average of 48.8% (p < 0.001) by extending the precipitation interval from 5 to 15 days. Precipitation quantity had no significant effect on belowground biomass. When compared with that under regular precipitation interval with same precipitation quantity, belowground biomass was significantly increased 56.2% (p < 0.001) with extended precipitation interval under low precipitation quantity, but was not significantly affected by extended precipitation interval under high precipitation quantity. The effect of precipitation quantity and interval on root/shoot ratio depended greatly on each other. Root/shoot ratio was significantly decreased by 28.4% (p < 0.05) by increased precipitation quantity only under the extended precipitation interval level and significantly decreased by 28.8% (p < 0.05) by extended precipitation interval only under increased precipitation quantity. During the whole treatment period, differences in aboveground, belowground and total biomass of seedlings between treatments for seedlings treated for 30 days and 45 days were determined by total precipitation quantity, and biomass differences for seedlings treated for 75 days were determined by precipitation interval. Therefore, precipitation interval could be as important as precipitation quantity on growth of S. grandis seedlings. Effects of precipitation patterns could be complex since the effects of precipitation quantity and precipitation interval interacted greatly and changed with seedling growth period.

Cite this article

ZHOU Shuang-Xi, WU Dong-Xiu, ZHANG Lin, SHI Hui-Qiu . Effects of changing precipitation patterns on seedlings of Stipa grandis, a dominant plant of typical grassland of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010 , 34(10) : 1155 -1164 . DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.10.004

References

[1] Bai YF, Wu JG, Xing Q, Pan QM, Huang JH, Yang DL, Han XG (2008). Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia plateau. Ecology, 89, 2140-2153.
[2] Chou WW, Silver WL, Jackson RD, Thompson AW, Allen- Diaz B (2008). The sensitivity of annual grassland carbon cycling to the quantity and timing of rainfall. Global Change Biology, 14, 1382-1394.
[3] Commission Editorial of Inner Mongolia Flora (内蒙古植物志编写委员会) (1994). Flora Innermongolica (内蒙古植物志). Inner Mongolia People’s Press, Hohhot. 5, 195-205. (in Chinese)
[4] Dodd MB, Lauenroth WK, Welker JM (1998). Differential water resource use by herbaceous and woody plant life-forms in a shortgrass steppe community. Oecologia, 117, 504-512.
[5] Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000). Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science, 289, 2068-2074.
[6] Fay PA, Carlisle JD, Knapp AK, Blair JM, Collins SL (2000). Altering rainfall timing and quantity in a mesic grassland ecosystem: design and performance of rainfall manipulation shelters. Ecosystems, 3, 308-319.
[7] Fay PA, Carlisle JD, Knapp AK, Blair JM, Collins SL (2003). Productivity responses to altered rainfall patterns in a C4-dominated grassland. Oecologia, 137, 245-251.
[8] Fravolini A, Hultine KR, Brugnoli E, Gazal R, English NB, Williams DG (2005). Precipitation pulse use by an invasive woody legume: the role of soil texture and pulse size. Oecologia, 144, 618-627.
[9] Gordon HB, Whetton PH, Pittock AB, Fowler AM, Haylock MR (1992). Simulated changes in daily precipitation intensity due to the enhanced greenhouse effect-implications for extreme precipitation events. Climate Dynamics, 8, 83-102.
[10] Groisman PY, Karl TR, Easterling DR, Knight RW, Jamason PF, Hennessy KJ, Suppiah R, Page CM, Wibig J, Fortuniak K, Razuvaev VN, Douglas A, Forland E, Zhai PM (1999). Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: important indicators of climatic change. Climate Change, 42, 243-283.
[11] Harper CW, Blair JM, Fay PA, Knapp AK, Carlisle JD (2005). Increased rainfall variability and reduced rainfall amount decreases soil CO2 flux in a grassland ecosystem. Global Change Biology, 11, 322-334.
[12] Heisler-White JL, Blair JM, Kelly EF, Harmoney K, Knapp AK (2009). Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Global Change Biology, 15, 2894-2904.
[13] Heisler-White JL, Knapp AK, Kelly EF (2008). Increasing precipitation event size increases aboveground net primary productivity in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia, 158, 129-140.
[14] Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[15] IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[16] Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996). A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia, 108, 389-411.
[17] Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Koelliker JK (2001). Frequency and extent of water limitation to primary production in a mesic temperate grassland. Ecosystems, 4, 19-28.
[18] Knapp AK, Fay PA, Blair JM, Collins SL, Smith MD, Carlisle JD, Harper CW, Danner BT, Lett MS, McCarron JK (2002). Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science, 298, 2202-2205.
[19] Knapp AK, Smith MD (2001). Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science, 291, 481-484.
[20] Lauenroth WK, Sala OE (1992). Long-term forage production of North American shortgrass steppe. Ecological Applications, 2, 397-403.
[21] Lundholm JT, Larson DW (2004). Experimental separation of resource quantity from temporal variability: seedling responses to water pulses. Oecologia, 141, 346-352.
[22] Maestre FT, Reynolds JF (2007). Amount or pattern? Grassland responses to the heterogeneity and availability of two key resources. Ecology, 88, 501-511.
[23] Meehl GA, Arblaster JM, Tebaldi C (2005). Understanding future patterns of increased precipitation intensity in climate model simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L18719.
[24] Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK (2001). Belowground primary production by carbon isotope decay and long term root biomass dynamics. Ecosystems, 4, 139-150.
[25] Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS (2006). Critical analysis of root: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology, 12, 84-96.
[26] Nippert JB, Knapp AK, Briggs JM (2006). Intra-annual rainfall variability and grassland productivity: Can the past predict the future? Plant Ecology, 184, 65-74.
[27] Noy-Meir I (1973). Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 25-51.
[28] Novoplansky A, Goldberg D (2001). Interactions between neighbour environments and drought resistance. Journal of Arid Environments, 47, 11-32.
[29] Robertson TR, Bell CW, Zak JC, Tissue DT (2009). Precipitation timing and magnitude differentially affect aboveground annual net primary productivity in three perennial species in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. New Phytologist, 181, 230-242.
[30] Sala OE, Lauenroth WK (1982). Small rain events: an ecological role in semi-arid regions. Oecologia, 53, 301-304.
[31] Sala OE, Lauenroth WK, Parton WJ (1992). Long-term soil-water dynamics in the shortgrass steppe. Ecology, 73, 1175-1181.
[32] Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002). The global biogeography of roots. Ecological Monographs, 72, 311-328.
[33] Sher AA, Goldberg DE, Novoplansky A (2004). The effect of mean and variance in resource supply on survival of annuals from Mediterranean and desert environments. Oecologia, 141, 353-362.
[34] Schwinning S, Sala OE (2004). Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141, 211-220
[35] Schwinning S, Sala OE, Loik ME, Ehleringer JR (2004). Thresholds, memory, and seasonality: understanding pulse dynamics in arid/semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141, 191-193.
[36] Scurlock JMO, Hall DO (1998). The global carbon sink: a grassland perspective. Global Change Biology, 4, 229-233.
[37] Sponseller RA (2007). Precipitation pulses and soil CO2 flux in an Sonoran Desert ecosystem. Global Change Biology, 13, 426-436
[38] Sun Y (孙颖), Ding YH (丁一汇) (2009). A projection of future changes in summer precipitation and monsoon in East Asia. Science in China (Series D) (中国科学D辑), 39, 1487-1504. (in Chinese)
[39] Swemmer AM, Knapp AK, Snyman HA (2007). Intra-seasonal precipitation patterns and above-ground productivity in three perennial grasslands. Journal of Ecology, 95, 780-788.
[40] Thornley JH (1972a). A balanced quantitative model for root: shoot ratios in vegetative plants. Annals of Botany, 36, 431-441.
[41] Thornley JH (1972b). A model to describe the partitioning of photosynthate during vegetative plant growth. Annals of Botany, 36, 419-430.
[42] Titlyanova AA, Romanova IP, Kosykh NP, Mironycheva- Tokareva NP (1999). Pattern and process in above-ground and below-ground components of grassland ecosystems. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10, 307-320.
[43] Weltzin JF, Loik ME, Schwinning S, Williams DG, Fay PA, Haddad BM, Harte J, Huxman TE, Knapp AK, Lin GH, Pockman WT, Shaw MR, Small EE, Smitth MD, Smith SD, Tissue DT, Zak JC (2003). Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. BioScience, 53, 941-952.
[44] Williams JW, Jackson ST, Kutzbacht JE (2007). Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 5738-5742.
[45] Wythers KR, Lauenroth WK, Paruelo JM (1999). Bare-soil evaporation under semi-arid field conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63, 1341-1349.
Outlines

/