Research Articles

Short-term impacts of Ocnerodrilus occidentalis and Evodia lepta on soil CO2 fluxes in an Acacia auriculaeformis plantation in Guangdong Province, China

Expand
  • 1South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
    2College of Horticulture and Garden, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei 434025, China
    3Heshan National Field Research Station of Forest Ecosystem, Heshan, Guangdong 529725, China

Received date: 2010-01-11

  Accepted date: 2010-05-27

  Online published: 2010-10-31

Abstract

Aims The exotic earthworm Ocnerodrilus occidentalis is widespread in plantation and abandoned areas in Guangdong, China. Its distribution is gradually expanding due to insensitivity to temperature, moisture, soil pH and soil organic matter. Study of the processes of soil carbon dynamics affected by O. occidentalis can provide new insights for the reduction of soil carbon emissions. Our objective was to investigate the short-term impacts of this exotic earthworm and native plants on soil CO2 fluxes.
Methods A field experiment was conducted in an Acacia auriculaeformis plantation at the Heshan Hilly Land Interdisciplinary Experimental Station. CO2 fluxes were measured for 15 days in situ using the static chamber technique and analyzed with a gas chromatogram.
Important findings Both O. occidentalis and Evodia lepta had no significant effects on soil CO2 fluxes. The effects of plant physical processes (such as shading), plant biological processes (such as secretion of root exudates) and overall processes on soil CO2 fluxes were -32.1%, 40.9% and 8.8%, respectively, in treatments without earthworm addition, and were -7.2%, 30.7% and 23.5%, respectively, in treatments with earthworm addition. Plant physical processes inhibited soil CO2 emissions, but enhanced the effects of the earthworm on soil CO2 emissions (increased by 39.3%). Plant biological processes enhanced soil CO2 emissions, but inhibited the effects of earthworms on soil CO2 emissions (decreased by 23.5%). Earthworm addition showed almost no significant impacts on most soil physical and chemical properties, but enhanced the activity of soil bacteria and led to a closer correlation between soil CO2 fluxes and soil physical and chemical properties. Meanwhile, earthworm activities changed the relationships between soil CO2 fluxes and soil hydrothermal factors. Hence, soil CO2 fluxes were not only influenced by hydrothermal factors, but also regulated by above- and below-ground biological processes. Therefore, it was difficult to determine an effective way to reduce forest soil CO2 emissions if only the amount of soil CO2 is considered and the impact of plant biological processes on soil CO2 fluxes is ignored. In order to reduce soil carbon efflux, it will be useful to note the potential of the independent and interactive effects of plant physical processes, plant biological processes and earthworm activity on soil CO2 flux.

Cite this article

GAO Bo, ZHANG Wei-Xin, LIU Su-Ping, SHAO Yuan-Hu, XIONG Yan-Mei, ZHOU Cun-Yu, FU Sheng-Lei . Short-term impacts of Ocnerodrilus occidentalis and Evodia lepta on soil CO2 fluxes in an Acacia auriculaeformis plantation in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010 , 34(11) : 1243 -1253 . DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.11.001

References

[1] Bohlen PJ, Parmelee RW, Blair JM, Edwards CA, Stinner BR (1995). Efficacy of methods for manipulating earthworm populations in large-scale field experiments in agroecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27, 993-999.
[2] Borken W, Gründel S, Beese F (2000). Potential contribution of Lumbricus terrestris L. to carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from a forest soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 32, 142-148.
[3] Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS (2003). Field measurements of root respiration indicate little to no seasonal temperature acclimation for sugar maple and red pine. Tree Physiology, 23, 273-280.
[4] Bouwmann AF, Germon JC (1998). Introduction. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27, 219.
[5] Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD (1998). Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biology, 4, 217-227.
[6] Dejong E, Schappert HJV, Macdonald KB (1974). Carbon dioxide evolution from virgin and cultivated soil as affected by management practices and climate. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 54, 299-307.
[7] de Deyn GB, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD (2008). Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecology Letters, 11, 516-531.
[8] Dickens HE, Anderson JM (1999). Manipulation of soil microbial community structure in bog and forest soils using chloroform fumigation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 2049-2058.
[9] Frosteg?rd A, B??th E, Tunlid A (1993). Shift in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forests as revealed by phospolipid fatty acid analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 25, 723-730.
[10] Frosteg?rd A, B??th E (1996). The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 22, 59-65.
[11] Gao B (高波), Fu SL (傅声雷), Zhang WX (张卫信), Liu SP (刘素萍), Zhou CY (周存宇 ) (2010). Short-term effects of earthworm and evodia lepta on soil N2O and CH4 fluxes in a subtropical plantation. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany (热带亚热带植物学报), 18, 364-371. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Groffman PM, Bohlen PJ, Fisk MC, Fahey TJ (2004). Exotic earthworm invasion and microbial biomass in temperate forest soils. Ecosystems, 7, 45-54.
[13] Grogan DW, Cronan JE (1997). Cyclopropane ring formation in membrane lipids of bacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 61, 429-441.
[14] Jia BR, Zhou GS, Wang FY, Wang YH, Yuan WP, Zhou L (2006). Partitioning root and microbial contributions to soil respiration in Leymus chinensis populations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 653-660.
[15] Keith H, Jacobsen KL, Raison RJ (1997). Effects of soil phosphorus availability, temperature and moisture on soil respiration in Eucalyptus pauciflora forest. Plant and Soil, 190, 127-141.
[16] Kretzschmar A, Ladd JN (1993). Decomposition of 14C-labelled plant material in soil: the influence of substrate location, soil compaction and earthworm numbers . Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 25, 803-809.
[17] Kristufek V, Ravasz K, Pizl V (1992). Changes in densities of bacteria and microfungi during gut transit in Lumbricas rubellus and Aporrectodea caliginosa(Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24, 1499-1500.
[18] Li HF (李海防), Xia HP (夏汉平), Fu SL (傅声雷), Zhang XF (张杏锋 ) (2009). Emissions of soil greenhouse gases in response to understory removal and Cassia alata addition in a Eucalyptus urophylla plantation in Guangdong Province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 33, 1015-1022. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] Liu GS (刘光崧), Jiang NH (蒋能慧), Zhang LD (张连第), Liu ZL (刘兆礼 ) (1996). Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis & Description of Soil Profiles (土壤理化分析与剖面描述). Standards Press of China, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[20] Pedersen JC, Hendriksen NB (1993). Effect of passage through the intestinal tract of detritivore earthworms (Lumbricus spp.) on the number of selected Gram-negative and total bacteria. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 16, 227-232.
[21] Raich JW, Bowden RD, Steudler PA (1990). Comparison of two static chamber techniques for determining carbon dioxide efflux from forest soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54, 1754-1757.
[22] Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992). The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B, 44, 81-99.
[23] Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P, Hobbie SE, Eissenstat DM, Chorover J, Chadwick OA, Hale CM, Tjoelker MG (2005). Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecology Letters, 8, 811-818.
[24] Schlesinger WH (1997). Biogeochemistry: an Analysis of Global Change. Academic Press, New York.
[25] Speratti AB, Whalen JK (2008). Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide fluxes from soil as influenced by anecic and endogeic earthworms. Applied Soil Ecology, 38, 27-33.
[26] Staaf H (1987). Foliage litter turnover and earthworm populations in three beech forests of contrasting soil and vegetation types. Oecologia, 72, 58-64.
[27] Tian G, Olimah JA, Adeoye GO, Kang BT (2000). Regenera- tion of earthworm populations in a degraded soil by natural, planted fallows under humid tropical conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 222-228.
[28] Waldrop MP, Firestone MK (2004). Microbial community utilization of recalcitrant and simple carbon compounds: impact of oak-woodland plant communities. Oecologia, 138, 275-284.
[29] Wang YS, Wang YH (2003). Quick measurement of CH4, CO2 and N2O emission from a short-plant ecosystem. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 842-844.
[30] Wessells MLS, Bohlen PJ, McCartney DA, Subler S, Edwards CA (1997). Earthworm effects on soil respiration in corn agroecosystems receiving different nutrient inputs. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29, 409-412.
[31] Xu M, Qi Y (2001). Soil-surface CO2 efflux and its spatial and temporal variations in a young ponderosa pine plantation in northern California. Global Change Biology, 7, 667-677.
[32] Zhang WX (张卫信), Li JX (李健雄), Guo MF (郭明昉), Liao CH (廖崇惠 ) (2005). Seasonal variation of earthworm community structure as correlated with environmental factors in three plantations of Heshan, Guangdong, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 1362-1370. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] Zerva A, Mencuccini M (2005). Short-term effects of clear felling on soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes in a Sitka spruce plantation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 2025-2036.
Outlines

/