植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1193-1210 doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0445

综述

被子植物蜜距的多样性及进化生态学研究

杨明威, 金晓芳,*

武汉大学生命科学学院, 武汉 430072

Diversity and evolutionary ecology of nectar spurs in angiosperms

YANG Ming-Wei, JIN Xiao-Fang,*

College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

通讯作者: * 金晓芳(jinxiaofang@whu.edu.cn)

编委: 陈小勇

责任编辑: 李敏

收稿日期: 2022-11-4   接受日期: 2023-03-1  

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(32160054)
国家自然科学基金(31800193)

Corresponding authors: * JIN Xiao-Fang(jinxiaofang@whu.edu.cn)

Received: 2022-11-4   Accepted: 2023-03-1  

Fund supported: National Natural Science Foundation of China(32160054)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31800193)

摘要

蜜距将花蜜隐藏在距的深处, 多样的蜜距形态和长度吸引各种喙长的传粉动物访花, 促进传粉生态位形成, 这对造就物种多样性起到了重要作用。因此蜜距被认为是促进物种形成的关键创新性状, 是研究被子植物花部结构演化、植物-传粉者协同进化的理想材料。系统地总结蜜距植物及其形态特征和传粉/盗蜜者, 有助于全面了解这一性状在被子植物中的系统发育分布和进化生态学意义。该文对国内外植物分类数据库(检索词“距”或“spur”)和已发表文章(检索词“有距植物属中文名+传粉”或“属拉丁名+ pollinator/nectar robber”)进行系统的梳理和总结, 收集蜜距植物、距长、蜜距形态、传粉者、盗蜜者等信息。整理出具有蜜距的植物分布在被子植物13个目23个科271个属, 共计3 427种。其中蜜距植物种数最多的科为兰科(1 536种)、罂粟科(487种)、毛茛科(351种)、凤仙花科(284种)、堇菜科(197种), 它们占所有蜜距植物种数的83.3%。根据蜜距的发育来源, 蜜距可分为6种类型: 花被片蜜距、花瓣蜜距、萼片蜜距、被丝托蜜距、花萼蜜距和花冠蜜距。花瓣蜜距分布于212个属, 显著高于其他类型。对2 546种植物的蜜距长度分析发现: 凤仙花科的蜜距平均长度最长, 达23.8 mm; 千屈菜科的蜜距最短, 平均仅1.6 mm。形态上, 大部分蜜距具有不同程度的弯曲, 这可能有助于筛选合适的传粉者, 提高访花者的传粉效率; 单花蜜距数量有1-6个, 大部分为1个, 多个蜜距可能增加传粉者的访花时间; 部分兰科和堇菜科植物蜜距内部具有可能分泌花蜜的附属物。蜜距植物的传粉者主要为膜翅目、鳞翅目、部分长喙双翅目昆虫及鸟类; 盗蜜者主要为膜翅目昆虫。蜜距的长度和传粉者的喙长普遍存在地理镶嵌的协同进化关系, 进化生态学家提出了“达尔文机械模型”的假说来解释这种现象; 而当传粉者喙长不变, 距长随着传粉者种类改变时则用“传粉者转变模型”来解释蜜距的伸长。未来在蜜距的进化生态学研究中, 不仅要关注蜜距植物的距长和传粉者喙长的形态学特征及传粉生态学研究, 还应借助发育解剖学和基因组学, 以及新的技术手段, 从细胞的分裂、伸长, 功能基因, 非生物因子等各个方面, 探索蜜距演化的驱动因素。

关键词: 蜜距; 距长; 关键创新性状; 花部结构; 盗蜜

Abstract

For many plants, nectar is hidden in the depth of nectar spurs. The diverse morphology and length of nectar spurs can attract pollinators with various proboscis lengths and promote the differentiation of pollination niche, which plays an important role in the formation of species diversity. Therefore, nectar spur is considered as a key innovation trait in promoting speciation and an ideal trait for studying floral evolution and plant-pollinator coevolution in angiosperm. This review systematically summarizes the worldwide plant taxonomic databases and published articles, classifies the nectar spur plants, and reviews the diversity and evolutionary mechanisms of nectar spur plants. We investigated 3 427 nectar spur species belonging to 13 orders, 23 families and 271 genera of angiosperm. Among them, Orchidaceae has the largest number of species, with 1 536 species, following by Papaveraceae with 487 species, Ranunculaceae with 351 species, Balsaminaceae with 284 species and Violaceae with 197 species, accounting for 83.3% of all the species. According to the sources of the development of nectar spurs, the nectar spurs can be divided into six types: petal spur, corolla spur, sepal spur, calyx spur, tepal spur and hypanthium spur. The petal spurs are the predominant type, detected in 212 genera. The average length of nectar spurs in Balsaminaceae is the longest (23.8 mm) among the 2 546 species whose nectar spurs have been measured. The shortest nectar spurs are reported in Lycelandaceae, which are only 1.6 mm on average. Most nectar spurs have different degrees of curvature, likely helping to improve the pollination efficiency. The number of nectar spur(s) in a flower ranges from 1 to 6, and most species have only one nectar spur in a flower. Multiple nectar spurs may increase the visiting time of pollinators. Some plants in Orchidaceae and Violaceae have appendages inside the nectar spurs, which may have the function of nectar secretion. The pollinators of plants with nectar spur mainly comprise insects from Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and some long-proboscis species from Diptera and birds. Nectar robbers are mainly bees and birds. There is a general association of geographic mosaic theory of coevolution between the length of nectar spur and the length of pollinator proboscis. Evolutionary ecologists have proposed the hypothesis of “Darwin’s Mechanistic Model” and “The Pollinator Shift Model” to explain this phenomenon. In future studies of the mechanisms of nectar spur evolution, we should not only focus on the morphological characteristics of spur length and proboscis length and the pollination ecology, but also explore the driving forces of nectar spurs evolution from cell division/elongation, functional genes, abiotic factors, with the help of novel technological approaches including developmental anatomy and genomics.

Keywords: nectar spur; spur length; key evolutionary innovation; floral structure; nectar robbing

PDF (30366KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

引用本文

杨明威, 金晓芳. 被子植物蜜距的多样性及进化生态学研究. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1193-1210. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0445

YANG Ming-Wei, JIN Xiao-Fang. Diversity and evolutionary ecology of nectar spurs in angiosperms. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023, 47(9): 1193-1210. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0445

大多数有花植物依赖动物传粉繁育后代, 为了与不同类群的传粉者相适应, 植物的花形成了各种特殊的性状, 这些性状体现在花的颜色、大小、结构等方面。其中, 有一类特殊的花部结构——蜜距(nectar spur), 因为增加了花报酬(花蜜)和生殖结构(雌蕊和雄蕊)之间的距离, 潜在影响了传粉动物的访花效率(Hodges et al., 2004)。通过长度和形状的演变, 蜜距帮助植物适应新的传粉类群, 占据新的传粉生态位, 进而造成生殖隔离, 促进物种形成(Fulton & Hodges, 1999; Shivanna, 2014; Minelli, 2016)。因此蜜距被认为是被子植物进化进程中的一种“关键创新性状” (key innovation trait; Fernández-Mazuecos et al., 2019)。特别是通过对耧斗菜属(Aquilegia)的长期研究, 蜜距已经被认为是植物关键创新性状教科书式的例子(Hodges & Arnold, 1995; Whittall & Hodges, 2007; Puzey et al., 2012), 是研究被子植物平行/趋同进化的理想材料(Box, 2010)。

从形态上看, 蜜距是被子植物的花瓣、萼片等花部器官上的管状或囊状突起(Cullen, 2020)。在大部分有距植物中, 蜜距是一种非分泌性结构, 其作用仅仅是储存花蜜; 花蜜从花的其他地方分泌出来, 汇聚在蜜距中(Box, 2010), 而在一些植物中, 蜜距已经进化成既储存花蜜, 也能分泌花蜜的结构(Stpiczyńska & Matusiewicz, 2001; Box et al., 2008; Bell et al., 2009)。从系统发育方面看, 蜜距不存在于被子植物基部类群中(Box, 2010), 而是衍生于单子叶植物(如兰科、百合科)和真双子叶植物(如毛茛科、车前科和狸藻科)中(Rudall et al., 2003; Endress & Matthews, 2006), 经历了多次独立进化(Hodges, 1997)。在不同科中, 蜜距的发育来源、长度、形状、方向、颜色、弯曲情况和附属物存在差异, 表现出很高的多样性(Hodges & Arnold, 1995; Hodges, 1997), 并且蜜距也是很多植物的分类依据(Koopman & Ayers, 2005), 但有关被子植物蜜距类型的多样性、生态学适应意义和研究现状还缺乏针对性的总结和归纳。系统地总结蜜距植物及其形态特征和传粉/盗蜜者, 将有助于全面了解这一性状在被子植物中的系统发育分布和进化生态学意义。

本文对国内外蜜距相关的数据库和文献进行了梳理, 总结了蜜距的主要来源及其系统分布、蜜距的形态多样性及其生态学适应意义, 统计了不同科植物蜜距长度的差异, 介绍了蜜距植物的主要传粉者和盗蜜者类群, 以及调节蜜距长度的进化机制, 并提出未来需要解决的科学问题。

1 数据来源和分析方法

1.1 数据来源

1.1.1 数据库

中国植物使用“植物智” (https://www.iplant.cn/)查询, 检索词为“距”, 同时勾选“全文检索”, 得到5 096条检索信息, 然后查阅每条信息, 排除“距离”等无效信息, 最终筛选出1 429种蜜距植物; 世界植物使用“世界植物在线” (http://www.worldfloraonline.org/)查询, 检索词为“spur”, 同时在“植物智”筛选的基础上, 对每个有距植物科的所有物种逐一排查, 最终筛选出2 541种蜜距植物; 去除“植物智”和“世界植物在线”重复数据共得到3 355种有距植物, 另外有72种蜜距植物来源于其他资料, 因此一共检索到3 427种蜜距植物; 在两个数据库中筛选蜜距植物的同时收集距长、蜜距形态等信息(收集的蜜距植物种类、距长、形态特征及资料来源见附录I)。另外, 部分蜜距的形态特征参考了《中国植物精细解剖》(马炜梁, 2018)。国外植物的地理分布情况参考“英国邱园植物园网站” (https://powo.science.kew.org/)。

1.1.2 文献

在“谷歌学术” (https://scholar.google.com.hk/)网站中, 使用检索词“有距植物属拉丁名+ pollinator/nectar robber”; 在“百度学术” (https://xueshu.baidu.com/)网站中, 使用检索词“有距植物属中文名+传粉”, 分别查阅英文和中文的传粉生物学相关文献, 获取有距植物的传粉者、盗蜜者信息(附录II)。

1.2 分析方法

从数据库和文献中获得的距长信息中提取可用于统计分析的数据。具体的处理方式是对于单个数据的, 如约6 mm则取值6 mm; 对于范围数据, 如3-4 mm取最大值即4 mm。使用R 4.2.2软件对17个科和不同类型的蜜距分别进行单因素方差分析并计算变异系数(标准差/平均值)。将变异系数与传粉者属数、标准差、平均值、数据量(详细数据见附录III)进行皮尔逊相关分析。

2 蜜距的类型

根据蜜距发育来源的不同, 可将蜜距分为6大类: 花瓣蜜距(petal spur)、花冠蜜距(corolla spur)、萼片蜜距(sepal spur)、花萼蜜距(calyx spur)、花被片蜜距(tepal spur)以及被丝托蜜距(hypanthium spur) (图1)。

图1

图1   被子植物蜜距的多样性。A, 二叶舌唇兰(兰科)。B, 木鱼坪淫羊藿(小檗科)。C, 中甸乌头(毛茛科)。D, 华北耧斗菜(毛茛科)。E, 早开堇菜(堇菜科)。F, 囊距紫堇(罂粟科)。G, 大花花锚(龙胆科)。H, 摩洛哥柳穿鱼(车前科)。I, 黄花狸藻(狸藻科)。J, 凤仙花属(凤仙花科)。K, 油点草(百合科)。L, 旱金莲(旱金莲科)。其中A-F为花瓣蜜距, G-I为花冠蜜距, J为萼片蜜距, K为花被片蜜距, L为被丝托蜜距。白色箭头所指为各种形态的蜜距。拍摄者: 金晓芳。

Fig. 1   Diversity of nectar spurs in angiosperms. A, Platanthera chlorantha (Orchidaceae). B, Epimedium franchetii (Berberidaceae). C, Aconitum piepunense (Ranunculaceae). D, Aquilegia yabeana (Ranunculaceae). E, Viola prionantha (Violaceae). F, Corydalis benecincta (Papaveraceae). G, Halenia elliptica var. grandiflora (Gentianaceae). H, Linaria maroccana (Plantaginaceae). I, Utricularia aurea (Lentibulariaceae). J, Impatiens sp. (Balsaminaceae). K, Tricyrtis macropoda (Liliaceae). L, Tropaeolum majus (Tropaeolaceae). A-F are petal spurs, G-I are corolla spurs, J is sepal spur, K is tepal spur, and L is hypanthium spur. The white arrows indicate the various forms of the nectar spurs. Photoed by JIN Xiao-Fang.


2.1 花被片蜜距

花被片蜜距是指来源于花被片的蜜距, 存在于单被花植物中, 包括秋水仙科和百合科, 一共3个属(表1)。其中秋水仙科有花被片6枚, 部分类群6枚花被片基部均形成囊状或距状, 包括万寿竹属(Disporum) (Don, 1841; Zou et al., 2001)和提灯花属(Sandersonia), 其中提灯花属分布于非洲南部。百合科22个属中仅油点草属(Tricyrtis)有蜜距, 该属有花被片6, 花被片的外轮3片基部形成囊状距(图1K) (Dodsworth, 2017)。

表1   被子植物蜜距的发育来源及其系统分布

Table 1  Origin and phylogenetic distribution of nectar spurs in angiosperms

-,未调查到传粉数据。

-,no pollination data was investigated.

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.2 花瓣蜜距

花瓣蜜距是指由离瓣花花瓣发育而来的蜜距, 是最常见的蜜距类型。主要存在于罂粟科、小檗科、毛茛科、堇菜科和大戟科的29个属, 以及兰科的183个属(表1)。

罂粟科中, 荷苞牡丹属(Dicentra)有4枚花瓣, 外面2枚花瓣基部囊状或距状(Macior, 1970); 紫堇属(Corydalis)花瓣后部形成蜜距(图1F), 极少数无距, 两侧的花瓣在极少数情况下呈距状, 如小距紫堇(C. appendiculata) (Lidén, 1996); 翅果烟堇属(Discocapnos)与三棱烟堇属(Trigonocapnos)主要分布在非洲南部, 它们的上花瓣形成蜜距, 距长为距宽的两倍(Manning et al., 2009)。

小檗科仅淫羊藿属(Epimedium)有蜜距, 其花瓣常形成距或囊(图1B), 少数无距, 如无距淫羊藿(E. ecalcaratum) (Guo et al., 2022)。

毛茛科中, 耧斗菜属(图1D)花瓣下方常向下延长形成蜜距, 极少数为囊状或不明显(Hodges, 1997), 如无距耧斗菜(Aquilegia ecalcarata); 乌头属(Aconitum) (图1C)、翠雀属与飞燕草属有2枚花瓣卷缩形成管状的蜜距(蜜腺位于蜜距末端), 并由1枚萼片包裹(图2A、2B) (Jabbour & Renner, 2012; Antoń & Kamińska, 2015), 乌头属少数种无距, 如空茎乌头(A. apetalum)等; 尾囊草属(Urophysa)的距瓣尾囊草(U. rockii)花瓣有短距, 而尾囊草(U. henryi)花瓣无距(Zhao et al., 2016)。

图2

图2   花瓣卷缩形成的蜜距(翠雀属、乌头属)和被丝托蜜距的结构解剖。A, 中甸乌头的花瓣蜜距。B, 中甸翠雀花的花瓣蜜距(被包裹在萼距里面)。C, 旱金莲的被丝托蜜距。NS, 蜜距; P, 花瓣; S, 萼片。拍摄者: 金晓芳。

Fig. 2   Nectar spur formed by petal rolling (Aconitum, Delphinium) and hypanthium spur. A, Petal spur of A. piepunense. B, Petal spur of D. yuanum (encased in calyx spur). C, Hypanthium spur of Tropaeolum majus. NS, nectar spur; P, petal; S, sepal. Photoed by JIN Xiao-Fang.


堇菜科蜜距均较短(图1E), 其中囊果堇属(Anchietea)、厚果堇属(Calyptrion)、盘种堇属(Corynostylis)主要分布于南美洲; 堇菜属(Viola)广泛分布于世界各地, 蜜距是其重要的分类学特征(Blaxland, 2004)。

兰科植物有距类群分布广泛, 多由花瓣发育而来, 部分属具明显的长距, 如虾脊兰属(Calanthe)、彗星兰属(Angraecum)等(Whittall & Hodges, 2007; Suetsugu & Fukushima, 2014), 部分属的蜜距呈兜状或囊状, 如盆距兰属(Gastrochilus)、鹿角兰属(Pomatocalpa)等(Watthana, 2007; Nguyen et al., 2022), 还有部分属的蜜距不明显或仅形成小突起, 如地宝兰属(Geodorum)、带叶兰属(Taeniophyllum)等(Chowlu et al., 2012; Teoh, 2022)。

2.3 萼片蜜距

萼片蜜距是指来源于萼片的蜜距, 存在于萼片离生的凤仙花科、牻牛儿苗科的4个属, 以及兰科的12个属(表1)。

凤仙花科中凤仙花属(Impatiens)下萼片呈囊状, 多数种类基部形成蜜距(图1J) (Hořák & Janeček, 2021), 少数种类无距, 如藏南凤仙花(I. serrata); 水角属(Hydrocera)下萼片为舟状或囊状, 有距(Janssens et al., 2012)。

牻牛儿苗科中, 凤嘴葵属(Monsonia)部分物种有蜜距, 例如M. parvifolia在每个萼片基部合生处形成蜜距(Venter & Johannes, 1979), 主要分布于非洲和亚洲西南部; 天竺葵属(Pelargonium)有萼片5枚, 近轴一枚萼片基部形成长距, 该距沿花梗生长并与之合生(Almouslem & Tilney-Bassett, 1989)。

大部分兰科蜜距属于花瓣蜜距, 目前仅调查到12个属的蜜距来源于萼片, 分布于兰科系统发育树的几个分支(Hobbhahn et al., 2013; Li et al., 2016)。其中DegranvilleaEltroplectris、双柄兰属(Bifrenaria)和凹唇兰属(Comparettia)主要分布在南美洲, 而凤仙兰属(Brownleea)分布于非洲(Szlachetko, 1995; Koehler et al., 2002; Pansarin et al., 2015)。值得注意的是分布于非洲的萼距兰属(Disa), 大部分有距植物的蜜腺位于蜜距内, 但D. longicornu的蜜腺位于花瓣上, 花蜜通过延伸的花瓣流入蜜距。

2.4 被丝托蜜距

被丝托蜜距是指来源于被丝托的蜜距, 包括旱金莲科(图1L, 图2C)和千屈菜科, 一共2个属(表1)。旱金莲科仅旱金莲属(Tropaeolum)有蜜距, 在发育过程中, 被丝托的近轴区域发育最快, 在此处形成蜜距(Louis et al., 2001)。千屈菜科仅萼距花属(Cuphea)有蜜距, 该属植物被丝托呈管状, 部分种类具蜜距(Graham, 1990)。

2.5 花萼蜜距

花萼蜜距是指来源于花萼(萼片合生)的蜜距, 主要出现在萼囊花科和豆科, 共8个属。其中萼囊花科有7个属: 落囊花属(Erisma)、木豆蔻属(Qualea)、萼囊花属(Vochysia)、木姜花属(Salvertia)、木山姜属(Callisthene)、木砂仁属(Ruizterania)和异宿囊花属(Korupodendron)存在花萼蜜距, 且花萼蜜距形态有所不同(Kawasaki, 1992; Carmo-Oliveira et al., 2017)。

2.6 花冠蜜距

花冠蜜距是指来源于被子植物合瓣花花冠的蜜距, 包括桔梗科、龙胆科、车前科、玄参科、芝麻科(胡麻科)、狸藻科、唇形科、忍冬科和草海桐科的30个属(表1)。

桔梗科中, 半边莲属(Lobelia)少数种类有蜜距, 如L. knoblochii, 距圆柱形或锥形(Ayers, 1987); 蟋尾花属(Heterotoma)主要分布于中美洲, 其蜜距为复杂的月牙形, 且侧向扁平(Ayers, 1987, 1990; Koopman & Ayers, 2005)。

龙胆科全世界有161个属, 本文仅调查到花锚属(Halenia)有蜜距。花锚属为钟形花冠, 多数物种4个裂片基部突出形成蜜距(图1G), 距长多变(Yang et al., 2018), 少数种类无距, 如H. viridis (Hagen & Kadereit, 2003)。

车前科植物的蜜距为多次起源, 且形态各异(Fernández-Mazuecos et al., 2019)。其中毛彩雀属(Chaenorhinum)花冠不规则, 基部形成锥形而直立的蜜距(Yousefi et al., 2016); 蔓柳穿鱼属(Cymbalaria)花冠为二唇形, 基部有圆柱形或锥形的蜜距(Kil et al., 2009); 柳穿鱼属(Linaria)花冠呈长筒状, 基部形成蜜距(图1H) (Box et al., 2011), 距长差异显著(Sutton, 1988; Fernández-Mazuecos et al., 2019)。

玄参科中调查到3个属有蜜距, 且均分布于国外。其中双距花属(Diascia)花冠两侧形成两个明显的蜜距(Steiner & Whitehead, 1990), 分布于非洲南部; Diclis与龙面花属(Nemesia)植物花冠为二唇形, 基部形成蜜距(Steiner, 1996), 主要分布于非洲。

芝麻科中风车麻属(Holubia)、佛肚麻属(Pterodiscus)和犀角麻属(Rogeria)的部分种花冠筒基部形成囊状距(Hilton & Harder, 2006); 刺麻木属(Sesamothamnus)花冠筒基部形成距或凸起, 蜜距细长, 明显(Bruce, 1953)。

狸藻科17个属中查到3个属下唇基部形成蜜距, 其中狸藻属(Utricularia)蜜距形态多变, 少数种类无距, 如U. simmonsii (Fleischmann, 2018; Płachno et al., 2018; Lustofin et al., 2020)。

唇形科296个属中仅发现4个属有蜜距。香茶菜属(Isodon)花冠筒基部上方呈浅囊状或形成短距, 与喉部等宽或略收缩, 该属的囊距香茶菜组(Sect. Melissoides)距明显, 而皱叶香茶菜组(Sect. Rabdosia)无距; 角花属(Ceratanthus)花冠筒基部常形成明显的蜜距(Paton, 1997); Platostoma部分种类花冠后基部具明显的蜜距(Suddee et al., 2019), 该属Sect. Ceratanthus花冠常有距, 而Sect. Mesona等无距(Paton, 1997)。

忍冬科忍冬属(Lonicera)植物花冠筒基部常肿大或形成囊状, 少数种类形成蜜距, 如长距忍冬(L. calcarata) (Weryszko-Chmielewska & Bożek, 2008)。距缬草属(Centranthus)的蜜距被误认为是花瓣蜜距 (Mack & Davis, 2015), 此属的蜜距实际为花冠基部向下延伸成尖管状, 且在此属多种植物中距长均短于管长, 如红缬草(C. ruber)。

总体而言, 根据本文调查被子植物约有13个目23个科(参照APG IV系统)具有蜜距, 图3所展示的是本文调查的13个目的蜜距植物所在系统发育树的位置。不同蜜距类型在被子植物系统发育树上反复出现, 表明蜜距在被子植物中经历了多次独立的演化。其中毛茛目和唇形目具有蜜距的科数最多, 分别为3和5个。天门冬目中兰科同时存在花瓣蜜距和萼片蜜距; 桃金娘目同时存在花萼蜜距和被丝托蜜距; 其他目仅存在单一蜜距。另外, 花被片蜜距仅存在于百合目; 花瓣蜜距存在于单子叶植物分支的天门冬目和真双子叶植物分支的毛茛目及金虎尾目; 萼片蜜距存在于单子叶植物分支的天门冬目和超菊类分支的牻牛儿苗目及杜鹃花目; 花萼蜜距均存在于真双子叶植物; 所有花冠蜜距植物均位于真菊类分支(The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2016)。

图3

图3   被子植物蜜距在目一级的系统发育分布。系统树根据Angiosperm phylogeny poster (APP)—Flowering plant systematics, 2019绘制(Cole et al., 2019)。线描图红色部分为蜜距所在位置。植物科和蜜距类型所附括号内为距长变异系数和样本量。两列箱型图分别为17个科和6种蜜距类型的蜜距长度log值(平均值±标准差)。

Fig. 3   Distribution of nectar spur types across angiosperm orders. The phylogeny of angiosperm orders is drawn according to the Angiosperm phylogeny poster (APP)—Flowering plant systematics, 2019 (Cole et al., 2019). The red parts of the line diagrams show the location of the nectar spurs. Coefficient of variation of spur length and sample size are enclosed in parentheses for plant families and nectar spur types. The log values (mean ± SD) of spur length for 17 families and 6 types of nectar spur are shown in the two box plots.


3 蜜距的形态多样性

3.1 蜜距的长度

有距植物蜜距长度变化很大, 比如千屈菜科、秋水仙科、龙胆科、桔梗科、萼囊花科、唇形科等的蜜距通常较短, 长度一般不超过10 mm; 而车前科、凤仙花科、堇菜科、兰科、狸藻科、牻牛儿苗科、毛茛科、小檗科、玄参科、罂粟科等的蜜距则有长有短, 差异很大, 其中部分物种蜜距极长, 如凤仙花科的Impatiens simbiniensis和兰科的Angraecum sesquipedale距长分别可达到48 cm和43 cm (Wasserthal, 1997)。

本文提取了2 546种蜜距植物最大距长信息, 排除数据量少于3的科, 剩下17个科2 542种植物进行单因素方差分析。因距长原始数据非正态分布, 因此经log转化后分析, 结果显示不同科之间蜜距长度存在显著性差异(F(17, 2524) = 21.67, p < 0.001) (图3)。其中凤仙花科的平均距长最长, 为23.8 mm; 千屈菜科最短, 为1.6 mm。通过单因素方差分析比较6类型(2 546种)蜜距的距长(经log转化), 结果显示不同类型之间蜜距长度存在显著性差异(F(5, 2540) =8.638, p < 0.001) (图3)。萼片蜜距的平均距长最长, 为17.0 mm; 花被片蜜距最短, 为5.25 mm。

相关分析结果(表2)显示, 距长在“科”水平的变异系数显著与标准差、平均值、数据量和传粉者属数显著正相关, 即科的平均距长越长, 蜜距长度的变异越大; 蜜距的长度变异越大, 传粉者属数越多。

表2   距长变异系数与距长其他特征的相关分析统计结果

Table 2  Statistical results of correlation analysis between the coefficient of variation of nectar spur length with other characteristics

标准差
Standard deviation
平均值
Average value
数据量
Amount of data
传粉者属数
Genus number of pollinators
rprprprp
蜜距类型 Type of nectar spur0.7810.0670.5630.2450.5420.2660.4130.416
科 Family0.889<0.0010.5020.0340.716<0.0010.752<0.001
属 Genus0.699<0.0010.3710.1070.0990.679-0.0790.808

皮尔逊相关性(r)和显著性(双尾, p)。

Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and significance (two-tailed, p).

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


3.2 蜜距尾部弯曲情况

蜜距尾部弯曲也是一个常见特征, 广泛存在于车前科、萼囊花科、凤仙花科、兰科、狸藻科、毛茛科、忍冬科、小檗科、玄参科、罂粟科等多个类群。不同类群植物蜜距的弯曲程度差异很大, 大部分物种的蜜距稍有弯曲, 如柳穿鱼(Linaria vulgaris); 部分物种的蜜距极度弯曲甚至形成环状, 如Impatiens oxyanthera (Wang et al., 2013)。

蜜距的弯曲程度常常影响到传粉者与盗蜜者的行为。例如, 蜜距的弯曲程度增加了传粉者的访花难度, 进而增加了传粉者在花上面的操作时间, 有助于筛选合适的传粉者、提高花粉移出效率以及柱头花粉落置量, 从而提高传粉的成功率(Travers et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2013; Boehm et al., 2022); 另一方面, 有研究表明盗蜜者更倾向于从弯曲程度大的花盗取花蜜(如Impatiens capensis), 从而限制了蜜距弯曲程度的不断增大(Young, 2008)。

3.3 蜜距的数量

在有距植物的不同类群中, 蜜距的数量存在差异。绝大多数类群蜜距仅有1个, 少数类群具有多个蜜距, 从2个到6个不等。例如, 兰科铠兰属(Corybas) (Dransfield et al., 1986)和鸟足兰属(Satyrium) (Johnson et al., 2011), 玄参科双距花属(Vogel, 1984), 毛茛科乌头属(Antoń & Kamińska, 2015)和翠雀属(Antoń & Kamińska, 2015), 兰科的双袋兰属(Disperis) (Kurzweil & Manning, 2005)都具有2个蜜距。仅有极少数高度特化的物种具有3个蜜距, 如倒距兰(Anacamptis pyramidalis f. fumeauxiana), 该物种是一种欺骗性、不产生花蜜的兰科物种, 其中一枚蜜距来源于唇瓣, 另外两枚蜜距来源于侧萼片(Kowalkowska et al., 2010, 2012)。具有4个蜜距的植物包括小檗科的淫羊藿属和龙胆科的花锚属(Li et al., 2009)。耧斗菜属具有5枚花瓣, 部分物种每枚花瓣向下延长成蜜距, 共形成5个蜜距(Antoń & Kamińska, 2015)。秋水仙科具有花被片6枚, 部分物种每枚花被片基部形成蜜距, 共形成6个蜜距, 如Disporum cantonnienseSandersonia aurantiaca (Zou et al., 2001)。

研究表明, 多个蜜距能够诱导传粉者在花上来回运动, 明显增加传粉者访花的时间, 增加花粉的传递效率, 是植物提高繁殖成功率的一种开花策略(Jabbour & Renner, 2012)。

另外, 在不同植物类群中, 蜜距在距内附属物、蜜距的方向等方面也存在差异。例如, 堇菜科某些物种存在距内附属物, 相当于蜜腺, 具有分泌花蜜的作用(Holmgren, 1992)。蜜距延伸的方向有的朝上, 有的水平, 有的朝下, 其中耧斗菜属、紫堇属大部分蜜距朝上, 堇菜属一般为水平, 淫羊藿属一般朝下(表1)。

4 蜜距的进化生态学研究概况

4.1 宏观进化

4.1.1 蜜距植物的传粉者和盗蜜者
4.1.1.1 传粉者

有蜜距的被子植物主要依靠长喙的昆虫和鸟类传粉, 其中昆虫和鸟类的喙与蜜距的长度之间的匹配对授粉效率至关重要(Krishna & Keasar, 2018)。这些传粉动物为获得更多的花蜜会将喙尽可能地伸入蜜距中, 其身体会更加充分地接触花粉和柱头, 提高传粉效率(Whittall & Hodges, 2007)。一些膜翅目昆虫具有较长的喙, 使之能够伸入蜜距中吸取花蜜, 是有距植物的重要传粉者(图4A-4F), 比如蜜蜂属(Apis)、熊蜂属(Bombus)、木蜂属(Xylocopa)、胡蜂科等类群(Macior, 1978; Peter & Johnson, 2009; Johnson et al., 2011; Vargas et al., 2017)。鳞翅目昆虫也是有距植物的重要传粉者, 其典型代表为兰科植物(Boberg et al., 2014)。双翅目昆虫常不具备长喙, 难以获取有距植物的花蜜, 很少作为有距植物的主要传粉者(Suetsugu et al., 2015)。然而, 部分双翅目昆虫具有较长的喙, 可以吸食有距植物的花蜜并传粉, 如网翅虻科的Moegistorynchus longirostris可以为兰科植物Disa draconis传粉(Johnson & Steiner, 1997)。 鞘翅目与半翅目昆虫几乎不具备长喙, 虽然可以作为部分短距植物的访花者, 但其传粉效率较低, 因此多数情况下不是有距植物的有效传粉者(Johnson et al., 2007, 2011; Orellana et al., 2008; van der Niet et al., 2010)。表1列出了文献中查阅的部分传粉者,但并不能完全代表所属类群的传粉者全貌, 只能作为参考。

图4

图4   蜜距植物的主要访花者和盗蜜者。A, 南熊蜂访中甸翠雀花。B, 独居蜂访柔毛淫羊藿。C, 条蜂访刻叶紫堇。D, 熊蜂访椭圆叶花锚。E, 熊蜂访顶喙凤仙花。F, 条蜂访摩洛哥柳穿鱼。G, 条蜂盗蜜地锦苗。H, 黄胸木蜂盗蜜凤仙花。拍摄者: 金晓芳。

Fig. 4   Pollinators and nectar robbers of some plants with nectar spurs. A, Bombus secures visiting Delphinium yuanum. B, Solitary bee visiting Epimedium pubescens. C, Anthophoridae bee visiting Corydalis incisa. D, Bombus sp. visiting Halenia elliptica. E, Bombus sp. visiting Impatiens compta. F, Anthophoridae bee visiting Linaria maroccana. G, Anthophoridae bee robbing nectar of Corydalis sheareri. H, Xylocopa appendiculata robbing nectar of Impatiens balsamina. Photoed by JIN Xiao-Fang.


鸟类是部分有距植物的重要传粉者, 主要包括蜂鸟科、太阳鸟科等具有长喙的类群(Macior, 1975; Miller, 1978; Johnson, 1996; Ellis & Johnson, 1999), 它们的主要访花植物有耧斗菜属、翠雀属、凤仙花属以及鸟足兰属等(Miller & Willard, 1983; Waser, 1988; Johnson, 1996; Janeček et al., 2015)。

不同传粉者对蜜距的形态和颜色有不同的偏好, 蜜蜂属往往倾向于访问短而弯曲的、蓝紫色的蜜距, 蜂鸟科更加偏好红色或者黄色的、中等长度的直距, 而天蛾科倾向于访问颜色较淡的、极长的直距(Edwards et al., 2022)。

4.1.1.2 盗蜜者

蜜距可能会提高植物的传粉效率, 但是也会面临被盗蜜的风险, 损失了给正当传粉者提供报酬物的量。所谓盗蜜是指一些昆虫、鸟类等访花者通过绕过花开口并在花基部打孔获取花蜜, 而没有或极少给花提供传粉服务的一种特殊访花行为(Inouye, 1980; 张彦文等, 2006)。盗蜜的发生往往是因为盗蜜者喙太短而无法通过正常访花取食到花蜜或者觅食效率太低, 只能采取打孔的方式更加高效地获取花蜜(Irwin & Brody, 1998)。盗蜜现象在开花植物中很常见, 几乎所有具有长管或者蜜距的开花植物都可能成为潜在的盗蜜对象(Irwin et al., 2010)。目前在59个科214种植物中发现盗蜜现象(Irwin & Maloof, 2002), 然而大部分蜜距植物并未产生防止盗蜜的保护结构, 可能是因为盗蜜对植物的繁育并非完全有害。

有距植物的主要盗蜜者为膜翅目昆虫(图4G、4H), 包括熊蜂属、胡蜂科、蜜蜂属、木蜂属、切叶蜂属(Megachile)、无垫蜂属(Amegilla)、芦蜂属(Ceratina)、蚁类科、回条蜂属(Habropoda)等多个类群, 此外, 盗蜜者还有鳞翅目、双翅目、半翅目、鸟纲等(Irwin & Maloof, 2002; Newman & Thomson, 2005; Chapurlat et al., 2015; Li et al., 2021)。其中, 熊蜂属、无垫蜂属、木蜂属等类群的口器可以破坏花组织, 为初级盗蜜者, 而蜜蜂属、鳞翅目等类群只能通过初级传粉者产生的孔洞盗取花蜜, 为次级盗蜜者(Rust, 1979)。此外, 合法的访花者也可能转变成盗蜜者, 这一方面是因为盗蜜可以高效地获取花蜜, 另一方面盗蜜可以更好地与其他访花者竞争花蜜资源(Irwin et al., 2010)。表1中列出了文献中查阅到的部分盗蜜者, 其中也包含了窃蜜者, 即不破坏花组织, 但是窃取花蜜同时不提供传粉服务的访花者。

4.1.2 距长的进化假说

被子植物蜜距的距长在多个类群发生了由短到长的变化(Whittall & Hodges, 2007; Cullen et al., 2018), 关于这些变化研究人员提出了很多假设来解释这个现象, 如: 1)蜜距长度与传粉者喙长的协同进化假说, 这个假说已经被多次证明(Johnson & Steiner, 1997; Svensson et al., 1998; Fulton & Hodges, 1999); 2)传粉者转变模型, 这个假说在耧斗菜等类群的蜜距长度变化中得到了很好的解释。下面对这两个假说一一介绍。

4.1.2.1 距长和喙长的协同进化假说-达尔文机械模型(Darwin’s Mechanistic Model)

早在1862年, 关于Angraecum sesquipedale如何进化出超长蜜距, 达尔文提出了首个协同进化过程的机械模型, 认为A. sesquipedale的蜜距与某种蛾类的喙在长度上存在军备竞赛(Johnson & Anderson, 2010)。当天蛾科昆虫从蜜距底部吸走花蜜时, 它们把喙的基部贴在花的繁殖器官上, 花粉落在天蛾的身体上被其传播给其他A. sesquipedale。因此, 只有那些蜜距比访花天蛾喙更长的A. sesquipedale个体才能够被传粉, 也只有喙更长的天蛾才能吸到更多花蜜。于是, 兰花进化出更长的蜜距来完成繁殖, 天蛾进化出更长的喙来吸到花蜜, 循环往复。当然, 大多数传粉者和植物不会一直增加距长和喙长, 因为协同进化在早期就被持续变化的选择压力阻止了, 例如过长的喙对天蛾飞行的限制阻止了喙的增长(Johnson & Anderson, 2010)。

植物距长和传粉者喙长的协同进化具有地理镶嵌的规律(Steiner & Whitehead, 1988, 1990; Robertson & Wyatt, 1990; 王晓月等, 2019)。所谓地理镶嵌的协同演化理论(geographic mosaic theory of coevolution, GMC)是指由于时间和空间的分隔, 不同群体中相互作用的物种形成了不同的协同进化(Thompson, 1999)。距长和喙长地理镶嵌的例子很多, 如由短喙的天蛾Deilephila porcellus传粉的二叶舌唇兰(Platanthera bifolia)居群的蜜距较短, 而由长喙的天蛾Sphinx ligustri传粉的居群则具有较长的蜜距(Boberg et al., 2014); 再如相较于依赖膜翅目传粉的变色耧斗菜(Aquilegia caerulea)居群, 更加依赖天蛾传粉的居群具有明显更长的蜜距(Miller, 1981)。

4.1.2.2 传粉者转变模型(Pollinator Shift Model)

协同进化并不是长蜜距进化的唯一假说(Johnson & Anderson, 2010), 另一个合理的解释是, 当植物在进化过程中面临不同传粉者转换时, 蜜距的长度也随之改变, 称之为传粉者转变模型, 由Grant和Grant (1965)及Stebbins (1970)的研究发展而来。在该模型中, 传粉者的转变是由当地传粉者动物群的变化引起的, 这可能由传粉动物生存范围的扩大或物种组成变化导致(Hilton & Harder, 2006)。在传粉者转变模型中, 传粉者的喙长被认为是相对固定的, 这可能是由于受到了体型大小的限制或其他植物蜜距长度的选择, 植物通过单方面的进化(one-sided evolution)适应已存在的传粉者喙长(Whittall & Hodges, 2007)。当植物传播到新的环境中, 蜜距长度就会变化以适应新的传粉者的喙长。理论上, 传粉者转变为喙明显较短的类群的可能性较小, 因为传粉者在无法获得回报时会选择避开花朵(Grant & Temeles, 1992; Hodges, 1995)。因此, 该模型预测, 随着时间的推移, 蜜距通常会变得越来越长。

然而, 蜜距退化甚至消失的现象也在许多被子植物类群中出现, 例如兰亚族, 其蜜距的退化与消失也与物种形成相关联(Cronk et al., 2002; Bateman et al., 2006), 对此有人提出了传粉者转移模型的局限性, 因为其无法解释蜜距的退化与消失(Hodges, 1995; Whittall & Hodges, 2007)。但与此同时, 也有人认为该模型依然适用, Box (2010)提出在长喙传粉者大量减少时, 短距植物会迅速多样化, 这样植物可以减少在花部结构和报酬上的投入, 从而被选择保留下来, 也可以促进生殖隔离与物种形成。

总之, 该假说与协同进化假说主要区别在于: 蜜距长度进化是在向新的传粉者转变的过程中迅速发生的, 而不是在一个物种与传粉者协同进化的过程中逐渐发生(Whittall & Hodges, 2007)。

4.2 微观进化

植物的蜜距在从无到有, 从短到长, 或从有到无等过程中, 宏观层面表现出传粉者的喙长或传粉者类群发生变化等现象; 同时在微观层面也能发现众多与蜜距演化相关的变化并体现了相应的调节机制。

4.2.1 细胞层面的变化

根据现有的蜜距发育解剖学研究, 蜜距在伸长过程中, 都经历了细胞的分裂和伸长这两个过程, 但是在不同的植物类群, 主要原因可能为其中一个, 例如, 耧斗菜属不同物种间距长的差异主要归因于细胞伸长(Puzey et al., 2012); 而另外一些类群, 如柳穿鱼属、兰科的Platanthera和兰亚族等距的长度主要归因于细胞分裂(Bateman & Sexton, 2008; Box et al., 2008; Cullen et al., 2018)。据此可推测, 不同类群蜜距植物的蜜距起源及演化的分子机制可能不尽相同。

4.2.2 基因层面的调控

对于蜜距长度调控的分子机制, 首先被考虑的是和细胞伸长或分裂相关的基因。例如, 生长素应答因子家族中的AqARF6AqARF8基因是耧斗菜属花瓣蜜距细胞伸长和蜜腺成熟特别需要的(Zhang et al., 2020), 这些基因可能在不同距长的耧斗菜属植物间存在某种结构或表达上的差异, 或者可能会受到传粉者选择的影响, 从而导致不同耧斗菜属植物蜜距长度的差异。对耧斗菜属植物的研究也指出转录因子AqIBL1可能抑制蜜距一侧的细胞伸长, 导致蜜距弯曲, 但仍需要进一步的实验验证(Edwards et al., 2022)。另外, 关于细胞分裂相关的基因方面, 有研究表明KNOX基因家族通过影响细胞的分裂和生长从而促进柳穿鱼属植物蜜距形成(Box et al., 2011)。

此外, 非生物因素也可能会影响蜜距长度相关基因的表达(Fernández-Mazuecos et al., 2019)。例如, 对Aquilegia coerulea研究表明在湿度和温度升高时, 蜜距往往更短(Brunet & van Etten, 2019), 提示气候条件可能会对蜜距长度产生影响。

总之, 结合不同的新技术、新方法研究蜜距的微观进化是今后的趋势。例如, 首先通过转录组-表达谱分析, 对比有距植物蜜距和其他器官、蜜距不同发育阶段、同属长距/短距/无距植物类群, 筛选与蜜距形成有关的候选基因; 然后通过基因敲除、转基因、基因沉默等方法进行验证。此外, 还可以利用生物信息学技术, 推测蜜距及其相关基因的演变过程, 构建相应的模型, 模拟蜜距的伸长、弯曲等发育过程, 从基因层面揭示距长受到生态影响后的演化模式(Rebocho et al., 2017; Edwards, 2022)。

5 展望

目前, 关于蜜距进化生态学的相关研究主要集中于耧斗菜属和兰科某些类群, 这些类群的距长和不同传粉者喙长有明显的一一对应关系(Wasserthal, 1997; Whittall & Hodges, 2007; Fernández-Mazuecos et al., 2019); 对柳穿鱼属、乌头族、凤仙花科和淫羊藿属也有少量研究(Jabbour & Renner, 2012; Vandelook et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2022; Xie et al., 2022), 而其余大部分蜜距植物的蜜距进化都没有得到很好的研究。并且, 关于距长的军备竞赛假说、传粉者转移假说, 以及地理镶嵌情况在很多植物类群的适用性还未可知。特别是关于蜜距演化的分子机制还有很多属于研究热点(Box et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2020; Edwards et al., 2022)。为此, 我们从宏观和微观两个方面提出未来值得深入研究的科学问题。

宏观方面: (1)盗蜜行为是否引起蜜距的形态改变? 植物是否产生了某些阻止或减少被盗蜜的机制? (2)蜜距在亲缘关系近的类群间存在着特征的变异和分化, 这些变化的选择压力是否来自传粉类群的差异?

微观方面: (1)蜜距的伸长主要来源于细胞的伸长、分裂, 是否由来自传粉者的刺激导致? 还是完全来自自然选择, 如来自于繁殖成功方面的影响? (2)蜜距的各个特征, 特别是距长变化的分子机制是什么? 相关基因有哪些? (3)来自同一器官, 如花瓣的蜜距是否具有更相似的起源和进化机制? (4)蜜距在被子植物中多次起源, 在不同目、科、属之间, 起源和平行进化的分子机制有何不同?

致谢

感谢中国科学院武汉植物园的叶忠铭和魏能在数据收集和文章构思中给予的帮助。

附录I 有蜜距植物名录及其文献来源

Supplement I Catalogue of plants with nectar spur and its documentary sources

附录II 蜜距植物的传粉者和盗蜜者类群

Supplement II Pollinators and nectar robbers of plants with nectar spur

附录III 距长的变异系数及相关性计算数据

Supplement III Calculation data for coefficients of variation and correlation of nectar spur length

参考文献

Almouslem AB, Tilney-Bassett RAE (1989).

The inheritance of flower doubleness and nectary spur in Pelargonium × hortorum Bailey

Euphytica, 41, 23-29.

DOI:10.1007/BF00022407      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Antoń S, Kamińska M (2015).

Comparative floral spur anatomy and nectar secretion in four representatives of Ranunculaceae

Protoplasma, 252, 1587-1601.

DOI:10.1007/s00709-015-0794-5      PMID:25772682      [本文引用: 4]

Nectaries are common in Ranunculaceae. These secretory structures, however, have not been studied in detail despite their importance in plant-animal interactions, and data relating to the structure of nectary spurs, which are so characteristic of several genera of this family, remain scarce. In order to redress this imbalance, we sought, in the present paper, to analyze the anatomical and ultrastructural organization of the nectary spurs of four representatives of Ranunculaceae, i.e., Aconitum lycoctonum L., Aquilegia vulgaris L., Consolida regalis Gray, and Delphinium elatum L. Nectary spurs were examined using light, fluorescence, scanning electron, and transmission electron microscopy. The floral nectaries of A. lycoctonum and A. vulgaris are situated at the apices of the spurs, whereas in C. regalis and D. elatum, the nectary is located along the floor surface of the spurs. Nectar in C. regalis and D. elatum is exuded through micro-channels in the cuticle, whereas in A. lycoctonum and A. vulgaris, it is released by means of cell wall disruption, indicating that the method of nectar secretion here is holocrine. Structurally, the nectary of all four investigated species is quite similar, and its cells are typical of nectar-producing cells described in the literature. It is proposed that in A. lycoctonum and A. vulgaris, disruption of the cell wall and the release of the entire cell contents into the spur cavity contribute to the composition of the nectar that the latter contains, enriching it with cytoplasmic components. We conclude that the manner of nectar exudation may vary considerably between closely related plant species, regardless of their geographical origin and phylogeny.

Ayers TJ (1987).

Four species from western Mexico new to Lobelia (Campanulaceae: Lobelioideae)

Brittonia, 39, 417-422.

DOI:10.2307/2807317      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Ayers TJ (1990).

Systematics of Heterotoma (Campanulaceae) and the evolution of nectar spurs in the New World Lobelioideae

Systematic Botany, 15, 296-327.

DOI:10.2307/2419185      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Bateman RM, Rudall PJ, James KE (2006).

Phylogenetic context, generic affinities and evolutionary origin of the enigmatic Balkan orchid Gymnadenia frivaldii Hampe ex Griseb

Taxon, 55, 107-118.

DOI:10.2307/25065532      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Although originally ascribed to the genus Gymnadenia R. Br. (Orchidinae: Orchidaceae), the Balkan endemic orchid G. frivaldii Hampe ex Griseb. has since been more frequently assigned to Pseudorchis Séguier (syn. Leucorchis E. Mey., Bicchia Parl.). Molecular phylogenetic analysis using the ITS region of rDNA reveals a large disparity between the two genera and demonstrates that frivaldii is embedded well within Gymnadenia s.s. Macromorphological and SEM studies further elucidate the floral and vegetative similarities between G. frivaldii and Pseudorchis, notably the heterochronically reduced gynostemium and small, short‐spurred labellum; these similarities represent convergent evolutionary transitions, whereas other characters such as contrasting stigma and tuber morphologies provide stronger phylogenetic signals. The sequence‐based phylogeny suggests that G. frivaldii represents one of three cases of independent paedomorphic floral reduction inferred in the genus; simplification has been more severe than in G. odoratissima but less severe than in the closely related Gymnadenia subgenus Nigritella. Alternatively, an effectively instantaneous evolutionary origin through hybridisation with a (most likely diploid) species of subgenus Nigritella remains possible. Reports of rare hybridisation between G. frivaldii and members of subgenus Nigritella are acceptably well documented, whereas reports of hybridisation with several other more phylogenetically distant orchid species (including the often sympatric Pseudorchis albida) are considered less secure.

Bateman RM, Sexton R (2008).

Is spur length of Platanthera species in the British Isles adaptively optimized or an evolutionary red herring?

Watsonia, 27, 1-22.

[本文引用: 1]

Bell AK, Roberts DL, Hawkins JA, Rudall PJ, Box MS, Bateman RM (2009).

Comparative micromorphology of nectariferous and nectarless labellar spurs in selected clades of subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae)

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 160, 369-387.

DOI:10.1111/boj.2009.160.issue-4      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Blaxland K (2004).

A new species of Viola (Violaceae) from south-west Turkey

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 145, 505-509.

DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00294.x      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Boberg E, Alexandersson R, Jonsson M, Maad J, Ågren J, Nilsson LA (2014).

Pollinator shifts and the evolution of spur length in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia

Annals of Botany, 113, 267-275.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mct217      PMID:24169591      [本文引用: 2]

Plant-pollinator interactions are thought to have shaped much of floral evolution. Yet the relative importance of pollinator shifts and coevolutionary interactions for among-population variation in floral traits in animal-pollinated species is poorly known. This study examined the adaptive significance of spur length in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia.Geographical variation in the length of the floral spur of P. bifolia was documented in relation to variation in the pollinator fauna across Scandinavia, and a reciprocal translocation experiment was conducted in south-east Sweden between a long-spurred woodland population and a short-spurred grassland population.Spur length and pollinator fauna varied among regions and habitats, and spur length was positively correlated with the proboscis length of local pollinators. In the reciprocal translocation experiment, long-spurred woodland plants had higher pollination success than short-spurred grassland plants at the woodland site, while no significant difference was observed at the grassland site.The results are consistent with the hypothesis that optimal floral phenotype varies with the morphology of the local pollinators, and that the evolution of spur length in P. bifolia has been largely driven by pollinator shifts.

Boehm MMA, Jankowski JE, Cronk QCB (2022).

Plant- pollinator specialization: origin and measurement of curvature

The American Naturalist, 199, 206-222.

DOI:10.1086/717677      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Box MS (2010). Role of KNOX Genes in the Evolution and Development of Floral Nectar Spurs. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

[本文引用: 4]

Box MS, Bateman RM, Glover BJ, Rudall PJ (2008).

Floral ontogenetic evidence of repeated speciation via paedomorphosis in subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae)

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 157, 429-454.

DOI:10.1111/boj.2008.157.issue-3      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Box MS, Dodsworth S, Rudall PJ, Bateman RM, Glover BJ (2011).

Characterization of Linaria KNOX genes suggests a role in petal-spur development

The Plant Journal, 68, 703-714.

DOI:10.1111/tpj.2011.68.issue-4      URL     [本文引用: 3]

Bruce EA (1953).

Notes on African Pedaliaceae

Kew Bulletin, 8, 417-429.

DOI:10.2307/4115530      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Brunet J, van Etten ML (2019).

The response of floral traits associated with pollinator attraction to environmental changes expected under anthropogenic climate change in high-altitude habitats

International Journal of Plant Sciences, 180, 954-964.

DOI:10.1086/705591      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Carmo-Oliveira R, Oliveira PE, Lange de Morretes B (2017).

Appendicular origin and structure of the spur of Vochysiaceae flowers

Acta Botanica Brasilica, 31, 433-444.

DOI:10.1590/0102-33062017abb0117      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Chapurlat E, Ågren J, Sletvold N (2015).

Spatial variation in pollinator-mediated selection on phenology, floral display and spur length in the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea

New Phytologist, 208, 1264-1275.

DOI:10.1111/nph.13555      PMID:26183369      [本文引用: 1]

Spatial variation in plant-pollinator interactions may cause variation in pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits, but to establish this link conclusively experimental studies are needed. We quantified pollinator-mediated selection on flowering phenology and morphology in four populations of the fragrant orchid Gymnadenia conopsea, and compared selection mediated by diurnal and nocturnal pollinators in two of the populations. Variation in pollinator-mediated selection explained most of the among-population variation in the strength of directional and correlational selection. Pollinators mediated correlational selection on pairs of display traits, and on one display trait and spur length, a trait affecting pollination efficiency. Only nocturnal pollinators selected for longer spurs, and mediated stronger selection on the number of flowers compared with diurnal pollinators in one population. The two types of pollinators caused correlational selection on different pairs of traits and selected for different combinations of spur length and number of flowers. The results demonstrate that spatial variation in interactions with pollinators may result in differences in directional and correlational selection on floral traits in a plant with a semi-generalized pollination system, and suggest that differences in the relative importance of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators can cause variation in selection. © 2015 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2015 New Phytologist Trust.

Chowlu K, Angela N, Rao AN, Vij SP (2012).

Two new additions to the orchid flora of Manipur, India

Kew Bull, 16, 1.

DOI:10.2307/4120346      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Cole TCH, Hilger HH, Stevens P (2019).

Angiosperm phylogeny poster (APP)—Flowering plant systematics, 2019

PeerJ Preprints. DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2320v6.

[本文引用: 2]

Cronk QCB, Bateman RM, Hawkins JA (2002). Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

[本文引用: 1]

Cullen E (2020). The Evolution and Development of Nectar Spurs. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

[本文引用: 1]

Cullen E, Fernández-Mazuecos M, Glover BJ (2018).

Evolution of nectar spur length in a clade of Linaria reflects changes in cell division rather than in cell expansion

Annals of Botany, 122, 801-809.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mcx213      PMID:29370374      [本文引用: 2]

Nectar spurs (tubular outgrowths of a floral organ which contain, or give the appearance of containing, nectar) are hypothesized to be a 'key innovation' which can lead to rapid speciation within a lineage, because they are involved in pollinator specificity. Despite the ecological importance of nectar spurs, relatively little is known about their development. We used a comparative approach to investigate variation in nectar spur length in a clade of eight Iberian toadflaxes.Spur growth was measured at the macroscopic level over time in all eight species, and growth rate and growth duration compared. Evolution of growth rate was reconstructed across the phylogeny. Within the clade we then focused on Linaria becerrae and Linaria clementei, a pair of sister species which have extremely long and short spurs, respectively. Characterization at a micromorphological level was performed across a range of key developmental stages to determine whether the difference in spur length is due to differential cell expansion or cell division.We detected a significant difference in the evolved growth rates, while developmental timing of both the initiation and the end of spur growth remained similar. Cell number is three times higher in the long spurred L. becerrae compared with L. clementei, whereas cell length is only 1.3 times greater. In addition, overall anisotropy of mature cells is not significantly different between the two species.We found that changes in cell number and therefore in cell division largely explain evolution of spur length. This contrasts with previous studies in Aquilegia which have found that variation in nectar spur length is due to directed cell expansion (anisotropy) over variable time frames. Our study adds to knowledge about nectar spur development in a comparative context and indicates that different systems may have evolved nectar spurs using disparate mechanisms.

Dodsworth S (2017).

Petal, sepal, or tepal? B-genes and monocot flowers

Trends in Plant Science, 22, 8-10.

DOI:S1360-1385(16)30189-3      PMID:27894712      [本文引用: 1]

In petaloid monocots expansion of B-gene expression into whorl 1 of the flower results in two whorls of petaloid organs (tepals), as opposed to sepals in whorl 1 of typical eudicot flowers. Recently, new gene-silencing technologies have provided the first functional data to support this, in the genus Tricyrtis (Liliaceae).Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Don D (1841).

A monograph of the genus Disporum

Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 18, 513-524.

DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1838.tb00201.x      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Dransfield J, Comber JB, Smith G (1986).

A synopsis of Corybas (Orchidaceae) in west Malesia and Asia

Kew Bulletin, 41, 575-613.

DOI:10.2307/4103118      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Edwards MB, Ballerini ES, Kramer EM (2022).

Complex developmental and transcriptional dynamics underlie pollinator-driven evolutionary transitions in nectar spur morphology in Aquilegia (columbine)

American Journal of Botany, 109, 1360-1381.

DOI:10.1002/ajb2.16046      PMID:35971626      [本文引用: 4]

Determining the developmental programs underlying morphological variation is key to elucidating the evolutionary processes that generated the stunning biodiversity of the angiosperms. Here, we characterize developmental and transcriptional dynamics of the elaborate petal nectar spur of Aquilegia (columbine) in species with contrasting pollination syndromes and spur morphologies.We collected petal epidermal cell number and length data across four Aquilegia species, two with short, curved nectar spurs of the bee-pollination syndrome, and two with long, straight spurs of the hummingbird syndrome. We also performed RNA-seq on A. brevistyla (bee) and A. canadensis (hummingbird) distal and proximal spur compartments at multiple developmental stages. Finally, we intersected these datasets with a previous QTL mapping study on spur length and shape to identify new candidate loci.The differential growth between the proximal and distal surfaces of curved spurs is primarily driven by differential cell division. However, independent transitions to straight spurs in the hummingbird syndrome have evolved by increasing differential cell elongation between spur surfaces. The RNA-seq data reveal these tissues to be transcriptionally distinct and point to auxin signaling as being involved with the differential cell elongation responsible for the evolution of straight spurs. We identify several promising candidate genes for future study.Our study, taken together with previous work in Aquilegia, reveals the complexity of the developmental mechanisms underlying trait variation in this system. The framework we established here will lead to exciting future work examining candidate genes and processes involved in the rapid radiation of the genus. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Ellis AG, Johnson SD (1999).

Do pollinators determine hybridization patterns in sympatric Satyrium (Orchidaceae) species?

Plant Systematics and Evolution, 219, 137-150.

DOI:10.1007/BF00985575      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Endress PK, Matthews ML (2006).

Elaborate petals and staminodes in eudicots: diversity, function, and evolution

Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 6, 257-293.

[本文引用: 1]

Fernández-Mazuecos M, Blanco-Pastor JL, Juan AN, Carnicero P, Forrest A, Alarcón M, Vargas P, Glover BJ (2019).

Macroevolutionary dynamics of nectar spurs, a key evolutionary innovation

New Phytologist, 222, 1123-1138.

DOI:10.1111/nph.15654      PMID:30570752      [本文引用: 5]

Floral nectar spurs are widely considered a key innovation promoting diversification in angiosperms by means of pollinator shifts. We investigated the macroevolutionary dynamics of nectar spurs in the tribe Antirrhineae (Plantaginaceae), which contains 29 genera and 300-400 species (70-80% spurred). The effect of nectar spurs on diversification was tested, with special focus on Linaria, the genus with the highest number of species. We generated the most comprehensive phylogeny of Antirrhineae to date and reconstructed the evolution of nectar spurs. Diversification rate heterogeneity was investigated using trait-dependent and trait-independent methods, and accounting for taxonomic uncertainty. The association between changes in spur length and speciation was examined within Linaria using model testing and ancestral state reconstructions. We inferred four independent acquisitions of nectar spurs. Diversification analyses revealed that nectar spurs are loosely associated with increased diversification rates. Detected rate shifts were delayed by 5-15 Myr with respect to the acquisition of the trait. Active evolution of spur length, fitting a speciational model, was inferred in Linaria, which is consistent with a scenario of pollinator shifts driving diversification. Nectar spurs played a role in diversification of the Antirrhineae, but diversification dynamics can only be fully explained by the complex interaction of multiple biotic and abiotic factors.© 2018 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2018 New Phytologist Trust.

Fleischmann A (2018). Systematics and Evolution of Lentibulariaceae: II. Genlisea. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[本文引用: 1]

Fulton M, Hodges SA (1999).

Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266, 2247-2252.

[本文引用: 2]

Graham SA (1990).

New species of Cuphea section Melvilla (Lythraceae) and an annotated key to the section

Brittonia, 42, 12-32.

DOI:10.2307/2807021      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Grant V, Grant KA (1965). Flower Pollination in the Phlox Family. Columbia University Press, New York.

[本文引用: 1]

Grant V, Temeles EJ (1992).

Foraging ability of rufous hummingbirds on hummingbird flowers and hawkmoth flowers

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 9400-9404.

[本文引用: 1]

Guo MY, Pang XH, Xu YQ, Jiang WJ, Liao BS, Yu JS, Xu J, Song JY, Chen SL (2022).

Plastid genome data provide new insights into the phylogeny and evolution of the genus Epimedium

Journal of Advanced Research, 36, 175-185.

DOI:10.1016/j.jare.2021.06.020      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Hagen KB, Kadereit JW (2003).

The diversification of Halenia (Gentianaceae): ecological opportunity versus key innovation

Evolution, 57, 2507-2518.

PMID:14686527      [本文引用: 1]

The plant genus Halenia (Gentianaceae) consists of herbs growing in temperate and tropical alpine habitats and most species possess flowers in which nectar is produced in spurs. This probably helps reward only specialized long-tongued pollinators, and a narrow pollinator/flower relationship is thought to accelerate diversification rates (a key innovation). To test the pattern of diversification of Halenia against the unspurred sister group we reconstructed phylogenetic relationships among 22 species plus outgroups using nuclear ITS and chloroplast rpl16 intron sequence data. We show that Halenia originated in East Asia and migrated via North America into Central America. From there, it colonized South America three times independently, probably within the last million years. Significant changes in diversification rates were found during the evolution of Halenia using a sister group method, a likelihood method, and a diversity-through-time plot. In contrast to other studies, we could not observe a direct speciation rate effect of the evolution of nectar spurs in comparison with the unspurred sister group of Halenia. Rather, increases in diversification occurred following the colonization of Central and South America by spurred progenitor taxa. This later switch in diversification may have resulted from the availability of new geographical and ecological opportunities, or from the availability of more and different pollinators in these regions. Following the latter hypothesis, the nectar spurs were a preadaption and functioned as a key innovation only in this new biotic environment. After an initial rapid increase, a reduction in diversification rate was observed in Central America, probably illustrating density dependence of speciation rates. Finally, we found preliminary evidence for the key innovation hypothesis in geologically young spurred and unspurred lineages of Halenia in South America.

Hilton LD, Harder SC (2006). Ecology and Evolution of Flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[本文引用: 2]

Hobbhahn N, Johnson SD, Bytebier B, Yeung LD, Harder LD (2013).

The evolution of floral nectaries in Disa (Orchidaceae: Disinae): recapitulation or diversifying innovation?

Annals of Botany, 112, 1303-1319.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mct197      PMID:23997231      [本文引用: 1]

The Orchidaceae have a history of recurring convergent evolution in floral function as nectar production has evolved repeatedly from an ancestral nectarless state. However, orchids exhibit considerable diversity in nectary type, position and morphology, indicating that this convergence arose from alternative adaptive solutions. Using the genus Disa, this study asks whether repeated evolution of floral nectaries involved recapitulation of the same nectary type or diversifying innovation. Epidermis morphology of closely related nectar-producing and nectarless species is also compared in order to identify histological changes that accompanied the gain or loss of nectar production.The micromorphology of nectaries and positionally equivalent tissues in nectarless species was examined with light and scanning electron microscopy. This information was subjected to phylogenetic analyses to reconstruct nectary evolution and compare characteristics of nectar-producing and nectarless species.Two nectary types evolved in Disa. Nectar exudation by modified stomata in floral spurs evolved twice, whereas exudation by a secretory epidermis evolved six times in different perianth segments. The spur epidermis of nectarless species exhibited considerable micromorphological variation, including strongly textured surfaces and non-secreting stomata in some species. Epidermis morphology of nectar-producing species did not differ consistently from that of rewardless species at the magnifications used in this study, suggesting that transitions from rewardlessness to nectar production are not necessarily accompanied by visible morphological changes but only require sub-cellular modification.Independent nectary evolution in Disa involved both repeated recapitulation of secretory epidermis, which is present in the sister genus Brownleea, and innovation of stomatal nectaries. These contrasting nectary types and positional diversity within types imply weak genetic, developmental or physiological constraints in ancestral, nectarless Disa. Such functional convergence generated by morphologically diverse solutions probably also underlies the extensive diversity of nectary types and positions in the Orchidaceae.

Hodges SA (1995).

The influence of nectar production on hawkmoth behavior, self pollination, and seed production in Mirabilis multiflora (Nyctaginaceae)

American Journal of Botany, 82, 197-204.

DOI:10.1002/ajb2.1995.82.issue-2      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Hodges SA (1997).

Floral nectar spurs and diversification

International Journal of Plant Sciences, 158, S81-S88.

DOI:10.1086/297508      URL     [本文引用: 3]

Hodges SA, Arnold ML (1995).

Spurring plant diversification: Are floral nectar spurs a key innovation?

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 262, 343-348.

[本文引用: 2]

Hodges SA, Fulton M, Yang JY, Whittall JB (2004).

Verne Grant and evolutionary studies of Aquilegia

New Phytologist, 161, 113-120.

DOI:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00950.x      URL     [本文引用: 1]

One of Verne Grant's lasting contributions to plant evolutionary biology has been the recognition that differences between plants in floral characters can have a dramatic impact on both pollinator visitation and pollen transfer and thus affect reproductive isolation between nascent plant species (collectively, floral isolation). Here we review some of the concepts and findings from Grant's work on floral isolation, particularly with respect to the genus Aquilegia (Ranunculaceae). It has now been over 50 yr since Grant first published on the role of floral isolation on reproductive isolation and speciation in Aquilegia and we compare and contrast his findings with our own work on this genus. We find that the data largely support Grant's findings and that Aquilegia will continue to offer great opportunities to learn about the processes of adaptation and speciation.

Holmgren NH (1992).

Two new species of Viola (Violaceae) from the Intermountain West, USA

Brittonia, 44, 300-305.

DOI:10.2307/2806928      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Hořák D, Janeček Š (2021).

A geographical perspective on the relationship between Impatiens spur lengths and bill lengths of sunbirds in Afrotropical Mountains

Ecology and Evolution, 11, 3120-3129.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.v11.7      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Inouye DW (1980).

The terminology of floral larceny

Ecology, 61, 1251-1253.

DOI:10.2307/1936841      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Irwin RE, Brody AK (1998).

Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness

Oecologia, 116, 519-527.

DOI:10.1007/s004420050617      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Irwin RE, Bronstein JL, Manson JS, Richardson L (2010).

Nectar robbing: ecological and evolutionary perspectives

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 271-292.

DOI:10.1146/ecolsys.2010.41.issue-1      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Irwin RE, Maloof JE (2002).

Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species

Oecologia, 133, 525-533.

DOI:10.1007/s00442-002-1060-z      PMID:28466170      [本文引用: 2]

Spatiotemporal variation in the interactions among plants and animals is widespread; yet our conceptual and empirical understanding of this variation is limited to a few types of visitors, mainly herbivores, pollinators, seed predators, and seed dispersers. Despite the ubiquity of nectar robbing and the strength of its effects on plant fitness, we know relatively little about the magnitude and intensity of spatial and temporal variation in interactions among plants and nectar robbers. The purpose of the present study was to quantify spatial and temporal variation in the interactions between a nectar-robbing bumblebee and its host plants. In the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA, over 7 years, and multiple locations, we measured levels of nectar robbing by the bumblebee Bombus occidentalis and its interactions with four different host plants, Delphinium nuttallianum (Ranunculaceae), Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae), Corydalis caseana (Fumariaceae), and Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Significant variation was found in the robbing rates experienced by different species. Within species, there was variation in robbing rates on an annual basis, on a seasonal basis, among different sites, and within sites. This variation may have important consequences with respect to the population dynamics of host plants as well as selection on floral and flowering traits. Electronic supplementary material is available if you access this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1060-z. On that page (frame on the left side), a link takes you directly to the supplementary materials.

Jabbour F, Renner SS (2012).

Spurs in a spur: perianth evolution in the Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae)

International Journal of Plant Sciences, 173, 1036-1054.

DOI:10.1086/667613      URL     [本文引用: 3]

Janeček Š, Bartoš M, Njabo KY (2015).

Convergent evolution of sunbird pollination systems of Impatiens species in tropical Africa and hummingbird systems of the New World

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 115, 127-133.

DOI:10.1111/bij.2015.115.issue-1      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Janssens SB, Smets EF, Vrijdaghs A (2012).

Floral development of Hydrocera and Impatiens reveals evolutionary trends in the most early diverged lineages of the Balsaminaceae

Annals of Botany, 109, 1285-1296.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mcs065      PMID:22499855      [本文引用: 1]

Balsaminaceae consist of two genera, the monospecific Hydrocera and its species-rich sister Impatiens. Although both genera are seemingly rather similar in overall appearance, they differ in ecology, distribution range, habitat preference and morphology. Because morphological support for the current molecular phylogenetic hypothesis of Impatiens is low, a developmental study is necessary in order to obtain better insights into the evolutionary history of the family. Therefore, the floral development of H. triflora and I. omeiana was investigated, representing the most early-diverged lineage of Impatiens, and the observations were compared with the literature.Flowers at all developmental stages were examined using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy.In Hydrocera, two whorls of five free perianth primordia develop into a less zygomorphic perianth compared with its sister genus. The androecial cap originates from five individual stamen primordia. Post-genital fusion of the upper parts of the filaments result in a filament ring below the anthers. The anthers fuse forming connivent anther-like units. The gynoecium of Hydrocera is pentamerous; it is largely synascidiate in early development. Only then is a symplicate zone formed resulting in style and stigmas. In I. omeiana, the perianth is formed as in Hydrocera. Five individual stamen primordia develop into five stamens, of which the UPPER PART OF THE FILAMENTS CONVERGE WITH EACH OTHER. THE GYNOECIUM OF I. OMEIANA IS TETRAMEROUS; IT APPEARS ANNULAR IN EARLY DEVELOPMENT.Comparison of the present results with developmental data from the literature confirms the perianth morphocline hypothesis in which a congenital fusion of the parts of the perianth results in a shift from pentasepalous to trisepalous flowers. In addition, the development of the androecial cap and the gynoecium follows several distinct ontogenetic sequences within the family.

Johnson SD (1996).

Bird pollination in South African species of Satyrium (Orchidaceae)

Plant Systematics and Evolution, 203, 91-98.

DOI:10.1007/BF00985239      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Johnson SD, Anderson B (2010).

Coevolution between food-rewarding flowers and their pollinators

Evolution, 3, 32-39.

[本文引用: 3]

Johnson SD, Ellis A, Dötterl S (2007).

Specialization for pollination by beetles and wasps: the role of lollipop hairs and fragrance in Satyrium microrrhynchum (Orchidaceae)

American Journal of Botany, 94, 47-55.

DOI:10.3732/ajb.94.1.47      PMID:21642207      [本文引用: 1]

Exposed nectar presentation is a key trait in flowers specialized for pollination by short-tongued insects. We investigated the pollination of Satyrium microrrhynchum, a rare South African orchid in which nectar is secreted as droplets on long floral hairs ("lollipop hairs") at the mouth of a shallow labellum. Our observations indicate that this orchid is pollinated specifically by two insect species: a cetoniid beetle (Atrichelaphinus tigrina) and a pompilid wasp (Hemipepsis hilaris). Both insects have short mouthparts and remove nectar from the hairs with sweeping motions of their mouthparts. Pollinaria become attached to the upper surface of their heads while they feed on the nectar. Beetles damage the hairs while feeding, which may explain the positive relationship between hair damage and pollination success in plants of S. microrrhynchum from populations where beetles were common. The orchid has cryptic green-yellow flowers with spectral reflectance similar to that of its leaves. The fragrance from plants in three populations, analyzed using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, was dominated by various terpenoids; linalool was the most abundant. Plants in different populations emitted similar compounds, but eugenol and derivatives of this compound were found in only one of the three populations. In an electrophysiological study (gas chromatography coupled to electroantennography), using antennae of A. tigrina, clear signals were elicited by some of the floral scent compounds.

Johnson SD, Peter CI, Ellis AG, Boberg E, Botes C, van der Niet T (2011).

Diverse pollination systems of the twin-spurred orchid genus Satyrium in African grasslands

Plant Systematics and Evolution, 292, 95-103.

DOI:10.1007/s00606-010-0411-1      URL     [本文引用: 3]

Johnson SD, Steiner KE (1997).

Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaceae)

Evolution, 51, 45-53.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02387.x      PMID:28568792      [本文引用: 2]

Field studies in South Africa showed that floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaceae) varies enormously between populations in the southern mountains (means = 32-38 mm), lowland sandplain (mean = 48 mm), and northern mountains (means = 57-72 mm). We tested the hypothesis that divergence in spur length has resulted from selection exerted through pollinator proboscis length. Short-spurred plants in several southern mountain populations, as well as long-spurred plants in one northern mountain population, were pollinated by a horsefly, Philoliche rostrata (Tabanidae), with a proboscis length that varied from 22 to 35 mm among sites. Long-spurred plants on the sandplain were pollinated by the tanglewing fly, Moegistorynchus longirostris (Nemestrinidae), which has a very long proboscis (mean = 57 mm). Selection apparently favors long spurs in sandplain plants, as artificial shortening of spurs resulted in a significant decline in pollen receipt and fruit set, although pollinaria removal was not significantly affected. Fruit set in the study populations was limited by pollen availability, which further suggests that selection on spur length occurs mainly through the female component of reproductive success.© 1997 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Kawasaki ML (1992). Systematics of Erisma (Vochysiaceae). Wiley Press, Hoboken, USA.

[本文引用: 1]

Kil JH, Park SH, Kim YH, Lee DB (2009).

Unrecorded and introduced taxon in Korea: Cymbalaria muralis P. Gaetrn. (Scrophulariaceae)

Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy, 39, 120-123.

DOI:10.11110/kjpt.2009.39.2.120      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Koehler S, Williams NH, Whitten WM, do Carmo E do Amaral M (2002).

Phylogeny of the Bifrenaria (Orchidaceae) complex based on morphology and sequence data from nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and chloroplast trnL-trnF region

International Journal of Plant Sciences, 163, 1055-1066.

DOI:10.1086/342035      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Koopman MM, Ayers TJ (2005).

Nectar spur evolution in the Mexican lobelias (Campanulaceae: Lobelioideae)

American Journal of Botany, 92, 558-562.

DOI:10.3732/ajb.92.3.558      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Phylogenetic studies are often hampered by the independent evolution of characters that may potentially obscure relationships. The adaptive significance of the nectar spur and its evolution within the Mexican lobeliads (Campanulaceae) is considered here. The taxonomic delimitations of Heterotoma from the Mexican species within the genera Lobelia and Calcaratolobelia were tested. Independent molecular data were gathered to determine whether the Mexican spurred lobeliads should be treated as distinct genera. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region from 18–26S nuclear rDNA and chloroplast DNA from the 3′ trnK intron were sequenced from 14 representative species. Our data suggest that Heterotoma, as originally conceived, is a good evolutionary unit within Lobelia and that the presence of a nectar spur is an important morphological character that can be used in defining phylogenetic position. This study also suggests that morphological changes associated with hummingbird pollination have evolved more than once in the Mexican lobeliads, from small blue‐flowered, insect‐pollinated relatives.

Kowalkowska A, Margońska H, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M (2010).

Comparative anatomy of the lip spur and additional lateral sepal spurs in a three-spurred form (f. fumeauxiana) of Anacamptis pyramidalis

Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 52, 13-18.

[本文引用: 1]

Kowalkowska AK, Margońska HB, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Bohdanowicz J (2012).

Studies on the ultrastructure of a three-spurred fumeauxiana form of Anacamptis pyramidalis

Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298, 1025-1035.

DOI:10.1007/s00606-012-0611-y      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Krishna S, Keasar T (2018).

Morphological complexity as a floral signal: from perception by insect pollinators to co-evolutionary implications

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19, 1681. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19061681.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Kurzweil H, Manning JC (2005).

A synopsis of the genus Disperis Sw. (Orchidaceae)

Adansonia, 27, 155-207.

[本文引用: 1]

Li DF, Yan XC, Lin Y, Wang L, Wang Q (2021).

Do flowers removed of either nectar or pollen attract fewer bumblebee pollinators? An experimental test in Impatiens oxyanthera

AoB Plants, 13, plab029. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plab029.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Pollen and nectar are the primary rewards offered by flowers to pollinators. In floral visitors of some plant species, pollen thieves and nectar robbers cause the reduction in pollen grain number and nectar volume, respectively. However, it remains unclear whether the absence of either of the two rewards in a given flower reduces its attraction to nectar- and pollen-collecting pollinators. We hypothesized that flowers removed of either nectar or pollen would attract fewer pollinators. We studied protandrous Impatiens oxyanthera, whose flowers provide bumblebee pollinators with both nectar and pollen in the male phase. We conducted floral reward manipulation experiments to explore how the removal of either nectar or pollen from flowers influences pollinator behaviour by comparing their visitation rates and visit duration. Compared with the control flowers, the flowers removed of pollen attracted significantly more bumblebee pollinators per 30 min, but the flowers removed of nectar or those removed of both pollen and nectar attracted significantly fewer bumblebee pollinators per 30 min. Moreover, the visit duration of bumblebee pollinators to control flowers or flowers removed of pollen was longer than that to flowers removed of nectar or those removed of both pollen and nectar. Our investigations indicated that compared with control flowers, the flowers removed of nectar attracted fewer bumblebee pollinators, supporting our hypothesis. However, our other hypothesis that pollen removal would reduce pollinator visits was not supported by our results. Instead, compared with control flowers, the flowers that contained only nectar attracted more bumblebee pollinators. Nectar seems to be the main reward, and bumblebee pollinators mainly used the absence of pollen as a visual signal to locate I. oxyanthera flowers with a potentially higher amount of nectar.

Li MH, Zhang GQ, Lan SR, Liu ZJ, Consortium CP (2016).

A molecular phylogeny of Chinese orchids

Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 54, 349-362.

DOI:10.1111/jse.v54.4      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Li YX, Quan QM, Sun GL (2009).

Effect of floral morphology on fruit set in Epimedium sagittatum (Berberidaceae)

Plant Systematics and Evolution, 279, 51-58.

DOI:10.1007/s00606-009-0145-0      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Louis P, Decraene R, Smets EF (2001).

Floral developmental evidence for the systematic relationships of Tropaeolum (Tropaeolaceae)

Annals of Botany, 88, 879-892.

DOI:10.1006/anbo.2001.1525      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Lustofin K, Świątek P, Miranda VFO, Płachno BJ (2020).

Flower nectar trichome structure of carnivorous plants from the genus butterworts Pinguicula L. (Lentibulariaceae)

Protoplasma, 257, 245-259.

DOI:10.1007/s00709-019-01433-8      [本文引用: 1]

Ma WL (2018). Fine Structure and Morphology of Plants in China. Higher Education Press, Beijing.

[本文引用: 1]

[马炜梁 (2018). 中国植物精细解剖. 高等教育出版社, 北京.]

[本文引用: 1]

Macior LW (1970).

The pollination ecology of Dicentra cucullaria

American Journal of Botany, 57, 6-11.

DOI:10.1002/ajb2.1970.57.issue-1      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Macior LW (1975).

The pollination ecology of Delphinium tricorne (Ranunculaceae)

American Journal of Botany, 62, 1009-1016.

DOI:10.1002/ajb2.1975.62.issue-10      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Macior LW (1978).

Pollination interactions in sympatric Dicentra species

American Journal of Botany, 65, 57-62.

DOI:10.1002/ajb2.1978.65.issue-1      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Mack JLK, Davis AR (2015).

The relationship between cell division and elongation during development of the nectar- yielding petal spur in Centranthus ruber (Valerianaceae)

Annals of Botany, 115, 641-649.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mcu261      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Manning JC, Goldblatt P, Forest F (2009).

A revision of Fumariaceae (Fumarioideae) in southern Africa, including naturalized taxa

Bothalia, 39, 45-65.

DOI:10.4102/abc.v39i1.229      URL     [本文引用: 1]

The native and naturalized species of Fumariaceae in southern Africa are reviewed, and keys and full descriptions are provided. All relevant regional synonyms are given and the indigenous species are illustrated. Three native genera with four species are recognized. The previously taxonomically unplaced genus Cysticapnos Mill. (3 spp.) is included with two other monotypic native South African genera, Discocapnos Cham. Schltdl. and  Trigonocapnos Schltr., in an enlarged circum­scription of subtribe Discocapninae, which is morphologically defined by tendrilliferous leaves and mostly sessile racemes with the lowermost flower basal. Two subspecies are recognized in Cysticapnos vesicaria (E.Mey. ex Bemh.) Lidén, subsp. vesicaria with fewer, smaller flowers and subsp. namaquensis J.C.Manning Goldblatt for plants from Namaqualand with more numerous, often larger flowers. C.  parviflora Lidén appears to be nothing more than a dwarf-fruited form of C. vesicaria, in which heterocarpy has long been known. C. pruinosa (E.Mey. ex Bemh.) Lidén is recorded for the first time to be a short-lived perennial and not an annual, thus unique in the tribe Fumarieae. Discocapnos mundii var.  dregei Harv. from the southern Cape is treated as subsp. dregei (Harv.) J.C.Manning Goldblatt on account of its slightly smaller fruits and significant geographical disjunction from subsp. mundii. Three introduced species are included, Fumaria capreolata L., F. muralis Sond. ex W.D.Koch subsp.  muralis and F. parviflora Lam. var. parviflora, although only the last two appear to be truly naturalized.

Miller RB (1978).

The pollination ecology of Aquilegia elegantula and A. caerulea (Ranunculaceae) in Colorado

American Journal of Botany, 65, 406-414.

DOI:10.1002/ajb2.1978.65.issue-4      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Miller RB (1981).

Hawkmoths and the geographic patterns of floral variation in Aquilegia caerulea

Evolution, 35, 763-774.

DOI:10.2307/2408246      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Miller RB, Willard CL (1983).

The pollination ecology of Aquilegia micrantha (Ranunculaceae) in Colorado

The Southwestern Naturalist, 28, 157-164.

DOI:10.2307/3671384      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Minelli A (2016).

Species diversity vs. morphological disparity in the light of evolutionary developmental biology

Annals of Botany, 117, 781-794.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mcv134      PMID:26346718      [本文引用: 1]

Two indicators of a clade's success are its diversity (number of included species) and its disparity (extent of morphospace occupied by its members). Many large genera show high diversity with low disparity, while others such as Euphorbia and Drosophila are highly diverse but also exhibit high disparity. The largest genera are often characterized by key innovations that often, but not necessarily, coincide with their diagnostic apomorphies. In terms of their contribution to speciation, apomorphies are either permissive (e.g. flightlessness) or generative (e.g. nectariferous spurs).Except for Drosophila, virtually no genus among those with the highest diversity or disparity includes species currently studied as model species in developmental genetics or evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). An evo-devo approach is, however, potentially important to understand how diversity and disparity could rapidly increase in the largest genera currently accepted by taxonomists. The most promising directions for future research and a set of key questions to be addressed are presented in this review.From an evo-devo perspective, the evolution of clades with high diversity and/or disparity can be addressed from three main perspectives: (1) evolvability, in terms of release from previous constraints and of the presence of genetic or developmental conditions favouring multiple parallel occurrences of a given evolutionary transition and its reversal; (2) phenotypic plasticity as a facilitator of speciation; and (3) modularity, heterochrony and a coupling between the complexity of the life cycle and the evolution of diversity and disparity in a clade. This simple preliminary analysis suggests a set of topics that deserve priority for scrutiny, including the possible role of saltational evolution in the origination of high diversity and/or disparity, the predictability of morphological evolution following release from a former constraint, and the extent and the possible causes of a positive correlation between diversity and disparity and the complexity of the life cycle.© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Newman DA, Thomson JD (2005).

Effects of nectar robbing on nectar dynamics and bumblebee foraging strategies in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae)

Oikos, 110, 309-320.

DOI:10.1111/oik.2005.110.issue-2      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Nguyen VC, Averyanov LV, Maisak TV, Nguyen TLT, Nguyen VK, Truong BV (2022).

Gastrochilus pankajkumarii, (Aeridinae, Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae), a new lithophytic orchid from southern Vietnam

Taiwania, 67, 35-39.

[本文引用: 1]

Orellana MR, Rovira AM, Blanché C, Bosch M (2008).

Effects of local abundance on pollination and reproduction in the narrow endemic endangered species Delphinium bolosii (Ranunculaceae)

Orsis, 23, 027-046.

[本文引用: 1]

Pansarin ER, Pansarin LM, Alves-dos-Santos I (2015).

Floral features, pollination biology, and breeding system of Comparettia coccinea (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae)

Flora- Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 217, 57-63.

[本文引用: 1]

Paton A (1997).

Classification and species of Platostoma and its relationship with Haumaniastrum (Labiatae)

Kew Bulletin, 52, 257-292.

DOI:10.2307/4110385      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Peter CI, Johnson SD (2009).

Pollination by flower chafer beetles in Eulophia ensata and Eulophia welwitschii (Orchidaceae)

South African Journal of Botany, 75, 762-770.

DOI:10.1016/j.sajb.2009.07.008      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Płachno BJ, Stpiczyńska M, Adamec L, Miranda VFO, Świątek P (2018).

Nectar trichome structure of aquatic bladderworts from the section Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae) with observation of flower visitors and pollinators

Protoplasma, 255, 1053-1064.

DOI:10.1007/s00709-018-1216-2      [本文引用: 1]

Puzey JR, Gerbode SJ, Hodges SA, Kramer EM, Mahadevan L (2012).

Evolution of spur-length diversity in Aquilegia petals is achieved solely through cell-shape anisotropy

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 1640-1645.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2011.1873      URL     [本文引用: 2]

\n The role of petal spurs and specialized pollinator interactions has been studied since Darwin.\n Aquilegia\n petal spurs exhibit striking size and shape diversity, correlated with specialized pollinators ranging from bees to hawkmoths in a textbook example of adaptive radiation. Despite the evolutionary significance of spur length, remarkably little is known about\n Aquilegia\n spur morphogenesis and its evolution. Using experimental measurements, both at tissue and cellular levels, combined with numerical modelling, we have investigated the relative roles of cell divisions and cell shape in determining the morphology of the\n Aquilegia\n petal spur. Contrary to decades-old hypotheses implicating a discrete meristematic zone as the driver of spur growth, we find that\n Aquilegia\n petal spurs develop via anisotropic cell expansion. Furthermore, changes in cell anisotropy account for 99 per cent of the spur-length variation in the genus, suggesting that the true evolutionary innovation underlying the rapid radiation of\n Aquilegia\n was the mechanism of tuning cell shape.\n

Rebocho AB, Southam P, Kennaway JR, Bangham JA, Coen E (2017).

Generation of shape complexity through tissue conflict resolution

Elife, 6, e20156. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.20156.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Out-of-plane tissue deformations are key morphogenetic events during plant and animal development that generate 3D shapes, such as flowers or limbs. However, the mechanisms by which spatiotemporal patterns of gene expression modify cellular behaviours to generate such deformations remain to be established. We use the Snapdragon flower as a model system to address this problem. Combining cellular analysis with tissue-level modelling, we show that an orthogonal pattern of growth orientations plays a key role in generating out-of-plane deformations. This growth pattern is most likely oriented by a polarity field, highlighted by PIN1 protein localisation, and is modulated by dorsoventral gene activity. The orthogonal growth pattern interacts with other patterns of differential growth to create tissue conflicts that shape the flower. Similar shape changes can be generated by contraction as well as growth, suggesting tissue conflict resolution provides a flexible morphogenetic mechanism for generating shape diversity in plants and animals.

Robertson JL, Wyatt R (1990).

Evidence for pollination ecotypes in the yellow-fringed orchid, Platanthera ciliaris

Evolution, 44, 121-133.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04283.x      PMID:28568207      [本文引用: 1]

Platanthera ciliaris is a butterfly-pollinated, terrestrial orchid with a loose terminal raceme of 10-50 orange flowers, characterized by a long nectariferous spur. In the southeastern United States, P. ciliaris occurs in the Appalachian mountains and coastal-plain physiographic provinces, but it is found rarely in the intervening Piedmont. In 1983 and 1984, detailed observations of two populations within these disjunct areas revealed that the butterfly species that serve as the primary pollinators differ sharply. In the mountains, Papilio troilus (spicebush swallowtail) was the most frequent and effective visitor, whereas in the coastal plain, P. palamedes (palamedes swallowtail) was the predominant pollinator. Proboscis lengths of P. troilus (mean = 23.3 mm) were significantly shorter than those of P. palamedes (mean = 28.7 mm). Floral characters, most notably spur length, also differed significantly between mountain (mean = 23.8 mm) and coastal-plain (mean = 25.6 mm) plants. In both 1983 and 1984, levels of pollinator service, as assessed by rates of removal and insertion of pollinia, were higher in the mountains (0.81 and 0.86) than in the coastal plain (0.63 and 0.67). In addition, fruit-set was significantly greater in mountain (83.9% in 1983, 86.5% in 1984) than in coastal-plain (63.8% in 1983, 65.5% in 1984) populations. We hypothesize that selection pressure exerted through pollinator proboscis lengths has resulted in pollination ecotypes of P. ciliaris. The short-spurred mountain plants appear to be in equilibrium with their short-tongued butterfly pollinators, receiving high levels of effective pollination and achieving high levels of fruit-set. Coastal-plain plants produce flowers with longer spurs which, nevertheless, are shorter than optimal for insuring that very long-tongued butterflies make contact with their pollinia. Thus, effective pollinator service and fruit-set are reduced. Correlation analyses in 1984 showed a positive relationship between spur length and fruit-set only in the coastal plain. The presence of long-tongued nectar thieves in the coastal plain may also contribute to lower effective pollinator service and fruit-set. Results of reciprocal-transplant studies attempting to determine the genetic basis of floral characters, including spur length, were inconclusive but suggest that differences between mountain and coastal-plain plants are not due solely to phenotypic plasticity.© 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Rudall PJ, Manning JC, Goldblatt P (2003).

Evolution of floral nectaries in Iridaceae

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 90, 613-631.

DOI:10.2307/3298546      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Rust RW (1979).

Pollination of Impatiens capensis: pollinators and nectar robbers

Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 52, 297-308.

[本文引用: 1]

Shivanna KR (2014). Biotic pollination: How plants achieve conflicting demands of attraction and restriction of potential pollinators//Ramawat KG, Merillon JM, Shivanna KR. Reproductive Biology of Plants. CRC Press, Baca Raton.

[本文引用: 1]

Stebbins GL (1970).

Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: Pollination mechanisms

Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 307-326.

DOI:10.1146/ecolsys.1970.1.issue-1      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Steiner KE (1996).

Chromosome numbers and relationships in tribe Hemimerideae (Scrophulariaceae)

Systematic Botany, 21, 63-76.

DOI:10.2307/2419563      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Steiner KE, Whitehead VB (1988).

The association between oil-producing flowers and oil-collecting bees in the Drakensberg of southern Africa. Monogr

Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 25, 259-277.

[本文引用: 1]

Steiner KE, Whitehead VB (1990).

Pollinator adaptation to oil-secreting flowers—Rediviva and Diascia

Evolution, 44, 1701-1707.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03857.x      PMID:28564320      [本文引用: 2]

Stpiczyńska M, Matusiewicz J (2001).

Anatomy and ultrastructure of spur nectary of Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) Orchidaceae

Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 70, 267-272.

DOI:10.5586/asbp.2001.034      URL     [本文引用: 1]

The anatomy and the ultrastructure of spur nectaries of &lt;em&gt;Cymnadenia conopsea&lt;/em&gt; at different developmental stages were investigated. The secretory epidermis surrounded the inside of spur and formed many unicellular papillae, which significantly enlarged the secretory surface. At the activity stage the epidermal cells contained characteristic plastids with well developed intraplastidal membrane system and numerous osmiophillic globules. The contact of plastids and endoplasmic reticulum indicates a possibility of the involvement of these structures in the secretory processes. The cell wall and the cuticle did not form a barrier for the secreted nectar and no pores or cracks were visible in the cuticle covering secretory papillae.

Suddee S, Paton A, Parnell J, Puudjaa P, Keiwbang W, Rueangruea S (2019).

Five new species of Platostoma (Lamiaceae) from North-Eastern Thailand

Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany), 47, 226-240.

[本文引用: 1]

Suetsugu K, Fukushima S (2014).

Bee pollination of the endangered orchid Calanthe discolor through a generalized food-deceptive system

Plant Systematics and Evolution, 300, 453-459.

DOI:10.1007/s00606-013-0894-7      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Suetsugu K, Naito RS, Fukushima S, Kawakita A, Kato M (2015).

Pollination system and the effect of inflorescence size on fruit set in the deceptive orchid Cephalanthera falcata

Journal of Plant Research, 128, 585-594.

DOI:10.1007/s10265-015-0716-9      PMID:25801274      [本文引用: 1]

Larger inflorescences in reward-producing plants can benefit plants by increasing both pollinator attraction and the duration of visits by individual pollinators. However, ultimately, inflorescence size is determined by the balance between the benefits of large inflorescences and the increased cost of geitonogamy. At present, little is known about the relationship between inflorescence size and fecundity in deceptive plants. Given that pollinators are likely to leave inflorescences lacking rewards quickly, it seems unlikely that longer pollinator visits and the risk of geitonogamy would be strong selective pressures in these species, which indicates that pollinator attraction might be the most important factor influencing their inflorescence size. Here we examined the pollination ecology of the deceptive orchid Cephalanthera falcata in order to clarify the effects of inflorescence size on the fruit set of this non-rewarding species. Field observations of the floral visitors showed that C. falcata is pollinated by the andrenid bee Andrena aburana, whilst pollination experiments demonstrated that this orchid species is neither autogamous nor apogamous, but is strongly pollinator dependent. Three consecutive years of field observations revealed that fruit set was positively correlated with the number of flowers per inflorescence. These results provide strong evidence that the nectarless orchid C. falcata benefits from producing larger inflorescences that attract a greater number of innate pollinators. Large inflorescences may have a greater positive effect on fruit set in deceptive plants because a growing number of studies suggest that fruit set in reward-producing plants is usually unaffected by display size.

Sutton DA (1988). A Revision of the Tribe Antirrhineae. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[本文引用: 1]

Svensson MG, Rydell J, Töve J (1998).

Deep flowers for long tongues

Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 259-260.

DOI:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01359-7      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Szlachetko DL (1995).

Eltroplectris brachycentron Szlachetko (Orchidaceae), a new orchid species from Bolivia

Novon, 5, 375-378.

DOI:10.2307/3391968      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Teoh ES (2022). Orchid Species from Himalaya and Southeast Asia Vol. 3 (R-Z). Springer Press, Berlin.

[本文引用: 1]

The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016).

An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 181, 1-20.

DOI:10.1111/boj.2016.181.issue-1      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Thompson JN (1999).

Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution

The American Naturalist, 153, S1-S14.

DOI:10.1086/303208      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Travers SE, Temeles EJ, Pan I (2003).

The relationship between nectar spur curvature in jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) and pollen removal by hummingbird pollinators

Canadian Journal of Botany, 81, 164-170.

DOI:10.1139/b03-014      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Floral nectar spurs are hypothesized to have had a major role in the evolution of floral diversity and plant-pollinator coadaptation. We examined variation in the degree of nectar spur curvature in two species of jewelweed (Impatiens capensis and Impatiens pallida) pollinated by different sets of pollinators. To distinguish between adaptive and nonadaptive explanations for between-species differences in curvature, we determined the relationship between spur curvature and pollen removal, which is one estimate of male reproductive success. Spur curvature exhibited considerable variation both within and among three populations, with spur angles ranging from 0° to 297°. A greenhouse experiment determined that spur curvature of I. capensis flowers has a broad-sense heritability of 0.636. Laboratory experiments indicated that flowers having recurved spurs deposit significantly more pollen grains on hummingbird visitors than flowers having perpendicular spurs, apparently as a result of greater contact between the androecium of curve-spurred flowers and the upper bill of hummingbirds. We also found a significant relationship between spur curvature and flower length, suggesting a developmental link between the two traits. We discuss the degree of spur curvature in bird-pollinated I. capensis as a function of both adaptive evolution and developmental constraint.Key words: pollination, nectar spurs, hummingbirds, Impatiens capensis, Impatiens pallida, pollen export, floral morphology, floral polymorphisms.

van der Niet, Jürgens A, Johnson SD (2010).

Pollinators, floral morphology and scent chemistry in the southern African orchid genus Schizochilus

South African Journal of Botany, 76, 726-738.

DOI:10.1016/j.sajb.2010.07.004      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Vandelook F, Janssens SB, Gijbels P, Fischer E, van den Ende W, Honnay O, Abrahamczyk S (2019).

Nectar traits differ between pollination syndromes in Balsaminaceae

Annals of Botany, 124, 269-279.

DOI:10.1093/aob/mcz072      PMID:31120478      [本文引用: 1]

The attractiveness of nectar rewards depends both on the quantity of nectar produced and on its chemical composition. It is known that nectar quantity and chemical composition can differ in plant species depending on the main pollinator associated with the species. The main aims of this study were to test formally whether nectar traits are adapted to pollination syndromes in the speciose Balsaminaceae and, if so, whether a combination of nectar traits mirrors pollination syndromes.Comparative methods based on Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models were used to test whether nectar volume, nectar sucrose proportion, sugar and amino acid concentration and amino acid composition had evolved as a function of pollination syndromes in 57 species of Balsaminaceae. Cluster analysis and ordination were performed to derive clusters of species resembling each other in nectar composition.Evolutionary models for nectar volume and nectar sucrose proportion performed best when including information on pollination syndrome, while including such information improve model fit neither for sugar and amino acid concentration nor for amino acid composition. A significant relationship emerged between pollination syndrome and the combined nectar traits.Our results show that nectar volume and nectar sucrose proportion evolve rapidly towards optimal values associated with different pollination syndromes. The detection of a signal indicating that nectar traits in combination are to a certain extent able to predict pollination syndromes in Balsaminaceae suggests that a holistic approach including the whole set of nectar traits helps us to better understand evolution of nectar composition in response to pollinators.© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.

Vargas P, Liberal I, Ornosa C, Gómez JM (2017).

Flower specialisation: the occluded corolla of snapdragons (Antirrhinum) exhibits two pollinator niches of large long-tongued bees

Plant Biology, 19, 787-797.

DOI:10.1111/plb.12588      PMID:28590517      [本文引用: 1]

Flower specialisation of angiosperms includes the occluded corollas of snapdragons (Antirrhinum and some relatives), which have been postulated to be one of the most efficient structures to physical limit access to pollinators. The Iberian Peninsula harbours the highest number of species (18 Iberian of the 20 species of Antirrhinum) that potentially share similar pollinator fauna. Crossing experiments with 18 Iberian species from this study and literature revealed a general pattern of self-incompatibility (SI) - failure in this SI system has been also observed in a few plants - which indicates the need for pollinator agents in Antirrhinum pollination. Field surveys in natural conditions (304 h) found flower visitation (>85%) almost exclusively by 11 species of bee (Anthophora fulvitarsis, Anthophora plumipes, Anthidium sticticum, Apis mellifera, Bombus hortorum, Bombus pascuorum, Bombus ruderatus, Bombus terrestris, Chalicodoma lefebvrei, Chalicodoma pyrenaica and Xylocopa violacea). This result covering the majority of Antirrhinum species suggests that large bees of the two long-tongued bee families (Megachilidae, Apidae) are the major pollinators of Antirrhinum. A bipartite modularity analysis revealed two pollinator systems of long-tongued bees: (i) the long-studied system of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) associated with nine primarily northern species of Antirrhinum; and (ii) a newly proposed pollinator system involving other large bees associated with seven species primarily distributed in southern Mediterranean areas.© 2017 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.

Venter H, Johannes T (1979). A Monograph of Monsonia L. (Geraniaceae). Springer Press, Berlin.

[本文引用: 1]

Vogel S (1984).

The Diascia flower and its bee—An oil-based symbiosis in southern Africa

Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 33, 509-518.

DOI:10.1111/plb.1984.33.issue-4      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Wang Q, Li YX, Pu XZ, Zhu LY, Tang Z, Liu Q (2013).

Pollinators and nectar robbers cause directional selection for large spur circle in Impatiens oxyanthera (Balsaminaceae)

Plant Systematics and Evolution, 299, 1263-1274.

DOI:10.1007/s00606-013-0794-x      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Wang XY, Tang XX, Tong ZY, Huang SQ (2019).

Geographic mosaic theory of coevolution in plant and pollinator interaction: process, evidence, prospect

Chinese Science Bulletin, 64, 1702-1710.

[本文引用: 1]

[王晓月, 汤晓辛, 童泽宇, 黄双全 (2019).

植物与传粉者地理镶嵌的协同演化: 过程、证据与展望

科学通报, 64, 1702-1710.]

[本文引用: 1]

Waser NM (1988).

Comparative pollen and dye transfer by pollinators of Delphinium nelsonii

Functional Ecology, 2, 41-48.

DOI:10.2307/2389458      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Wasserthal LT (1997).

The pollinators of the Malagasy star orchids Angraecum sesquipedale, A. sororium and A. compactum and the evolution of extremely long spurs by pollinator shift

Botanica Acta, 110, 343-359.

DOI:10.1111/plb.1997.110.issue-5      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Watthana S (2007).

The genus Pomatocalpa (Orchidaceae) a taxonomic monograph

Harvard Papers in Botany, 11, 207-256.

DOI:10.3100/1043-4534(2007)11[207:TGPOAT]2.0.CO;2      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Weryszko-Chmielewska E, Bożek M (2008).

Structure of trichomatous nectaries in flowers of Lonicera kamtschatica (Sevast.) Pojark

Acta Agrobotanica, 61, 13-26.

DOI:10.5586/aa.2008.002      URL     [本文引用: 1]

The structure of the floral nectaries of <i>Lonicera kamtschatica</i> was examined using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Nectariferous tissues are located in the lower portion of the corolla tube. It was found that the secretory tissue of the nectary was composed of two layers of epidermal formations: short papillae and about 3x longer unicellular trichomes. They cover the adaxial surface of a small spur. Nectar secretion takes place through the apical portion of the trichomes and papillae. The cell wall of the upper part of the trichome has protuberances participating in nectar transfer to the subcuticular space which reaches large dimensions. The lateral walls of the trichomes are saturated with cutin. The papillae have much thicker walls than the trichomes. In the papillae, there are no wall protuberances. Less secretion accumulates in the subcuticular cavities of the papillae than in the trichomes.

Whittall JB, Hodges SA (2007).

Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers

Nature, 447, 706-709.

DOI:10.1038/nature05857      [本文引用: 8]

Xie SY, Hou XQ, Zhang XH (2022).

Are the spurs more complex than other petal types in Epimedium? Evidence from development, micromorphology, and nectary structure

Flora, 293, 152101. DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2022.152101.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Yang ML, Wang LL, Zhang GP, Meng LH, Yang YP, Duan YW (2018).

Equipped for migrations across high latitude regions? Reduced spur length and outcrossing rate in a biennial Halenia elliptica (Gentianaceae) with mixed mating system along a latitude gradient

Frontiers in Genetics, 9, 223. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00223.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Young HJ (2008).

Selection on spur shape in Impatiens capensis

Oecologia, 156, 535-543.

DOI:10.1007/s00442-008-1014-1      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Yousefi N, Zarre S, Heubl G (2016).

Molecular phylogeny of the mainly Mediterranean genera Chaenorhinum, Kickxia and Nanorrhinum (Plantaginaceae, tribe Antirrhineae), with focus on taxa in the Flora Iranica region

Nordic Journal of Botany, 34, 455-463.

DOI:10.1111/njb.2016.v34.i4      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Zhang R, Min Y, Holappa LD, Walcher-Chevillet CL, Duan XS, Donaldson E, Kong HZ, Kramer EM (2020).

A role for the Auxin Response Factors ARF6 and ARF8 homologs in petal spur elongation and nectary maturation in Aquilegia

New Phytologist, 227, 1392-1405.

DOI:10.1111/nph.16633      PMID:32356309      [本文引用: 2]

The petal spur of the basal eudicot Aquilegia is a key innovation associated with the adaptive radiation of the genus. Previous studies have shown that diversification of Aquilegia spur length can be predominantly attributed to variation in cell elongation. However, the genetic pathways that control the development of petal spurs are still being investigated. Here, we focus on a pair of closely related homologs of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR family, AqARF6 and AqARF8, to explore their roles in Aquileiga coerulea petal spur development. Expression analyses of the two genes show that they are broadly expressed in vegetative and floral organs, but have relatively higher expression in petal spurs, particularly at later stages. Knockdown of the two AqARF6 and AqARF8 transcripts using virus-induced gene silencing resulted in largely petal-specific defects, including a significant reduction in spur length due to a decrease in cell elongation. These spurs also exhibited an absence of nectar production, which was correlated with downregulation of STYLISH homologs that have previously been shown to control nectary development. This study provides the first evidence of ARF6/8 homolog-mediated petal development outside the core eudicots. The genes appear to be specifically required for cell elongation and nectary maturation in the Aquilegia petal spur.© 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust.

Zhang YW, Wang Y, Guo YH (2006).

The effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction and evolution

Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 30, 695-702.

DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0091      URL     [本文引用: 1]

[张彦文, 王勇, 郭友好 (2006).

盗蜜行为在植物繁殖生态学中的意义

植物生态学报, 30, 695-702.]

DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0091      [本文引用: 1]

在动植物的相互关系中,盗蜜行为被认为是一种不同于普通传粉者的非正常访花行为。动物之所以要采取这种特殊的觅食策略,有假说认为是由访花者的口器和植物的花部形态不匹配造成的,也有认为是盗蜜行为提高了觅食效率从而使盗蜜者受益。在盗蜜现象中, 盗蜜者和宿主植物之间的关系是复杂的。盗蜜对宿主植物的影响尤其是对其繁殖适合度的影响归纳起来有正面、负面以及中性3类。与此同时,盗蜜者的种类, 性别及其掠食行为差异不仅与生境因素密切相关,而且会对宿主植物的繁殖成功产生直接或间接的影响。另外,盗蜜者的存在无疑对其它正常传粉者的访花行为也产生一定的影响,从而间接地影响宿主植物的繁殖成功, 而植物在花部形态上也出现了对盗蜜现象的适应性进化。作者认为, 盗蜜是短嘴蜂对长管型花最有效的一种掠食策略, 它不仅增加了盗蜜者对资源的利用能力, 而且由于盗蜜对宿主植物繁殖成功的不同的影响使其具有调节盗蜜者和宿主之间种群动态的作用, 两者的彼此适应是一种协同进化的结果。

Zhao L, Gong JZ, Zhang XH, Liu TQ, Ma X, Ren Y (2016).

Floral organogenesis in Urophysa rockii, a rediscovered endangered and rare species of Ranunculaceae

Botany, 94, 215-224.

DOI:10.1139/cjb-2015-0232      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Urophysa is an Asian endemic genus in the Ranunculaceae, but data on floral organogenesis, which would be a useful complement to molecular data in clarifying the relationship with closely related taxa (Aquilegia and Semiaquilegia) in Ranunculaceae, are completely lacking. We used scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy to study the floral development of Urophysa rockii Ulbrich, a recently rediscovered species in this genus. The sepals are initiated spirally, whereas other organs are nonsimultaneously whorled; the floral phyllotaxis is whorled. Primordia of the sepals are lunular and truncate, but those of the petals and stamens are hemispherical and rounded. After sepal initiation, there is a delay in development, but the initiation of petals and stamens is continuous. The developmental sequence of the microspores in the stamens is centrifugal, although the stamens are initiated centripetally. The early developmental stages of the staminodes are similar to those of the stamens, although much smaller, so they may be phylogenetically homologous organs. The carpel primordia are lunular in shape and plicate. The mature ovule is anatropous and bitegmic. Urophysa shows similar floral development features as Aquilegia and Semiaquilegia, although with some differences, which supports the relationship inferred by DNA sequence data.

Zou X, Fountain DW, Morgan ER (2001).

Anatomical and morphological studies of seed development in Sandersonia aurantiaca (Hook.)

South African Journal of Botany, 67, 183-192.

DOI:10.1016/S0254-6299(15)31118-2      URL     [本文引用: 2]

/