Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 732-742.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0095
Previous Articles Next Articles
NIU Jian-Zhi(), YU Xin-Xiao, ZHAO Yu-Tao, ZHANG Dong-Sheng, CHEN Li-Hua, ZHANG Zhi-Qiang
Received:
2004-10-21
Accepted:
2006-01-30
Online:
2006-10-21
Published:
2006-09-30
NIU Jian-Zhi, YU Xin-Xiao, ZHAO Yu-Tao, ZHANG Dong-Sheng, CHEN Li-Hua, ZHANG Zhi-Qiang. STUDY OF SOIL PREFERENTIAL FLOW IN THE DARK CONIFEROUS FOREST OF GONGGA MOUNTAIN, CHINA[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(5): 732-742.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0095
林地类型 Type of forest land | 土层深度 Depth(cm) | 毛管孔隙度 Capillary(%) | 总孔隙度 Total porosity(%) | 非毛管孔隙度 Non-capillary(%) | 土壤通气度 Ventilation(%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
过熟林 Over-mature forest | 0~20 | 83.47 | 95.32 | 11.86 | 94.79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20~40 | 25.14 | 28.14 | 2.99 | 28.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
成熟林 Mature forest | 0~20 | 61.27 | 64.94 | 3.67 | 64.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20~40 | 77.03 | 79.01 | 1.97 | 78.55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40~60 | 64.07 | 65.90 | 1.84 | 65.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60~80 | 64.20 | 65.21 | 1.01 | 64.84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80~100 | 62.28 | 64.02 | 1.74 | 63.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100~120 | 61.45 | 62.51 | 1.06 | 62.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
中龄林 Middle-aged forest | 0~20 | 72.68 | 79.70 | 7.02 | 79.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20~40 | 42.01 | 43.37 | 1.36 | 43.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
幼龄林 Young forest | 0~20 | 42.53 | 52.74 | 10.21 | 52.53 |
Table 1 Distribution status of soil pores in study area
林地类型 Type of forest land | 土层深度 Depth(cm) | 毛管孔隙度 Capillary(%) | 总孔隙度 Total porosity(%) | 非毛管孔隙度 Non-capillary(%) | 土壤通气度 Ventilation(%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
过熟林 Over-mature forest | 0~20 | 83.47 | 95.32 | 11.86 | 94.79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20~40 | 25.14 | 28.14 | 2.99 | 28.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
成熟林 Mature forest | 0~20 | 61.27 | 64.94 | 3.67 | 64.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20~40 | 77.03 | 79.01 | 1.97 | 78.55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40~60 | 64.07 | 65.90 | 1.84 | 65.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60~80 | 64.20 | 65.21 | 1.01 | 64.84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80~100 | 62.28 | 64.02 | 1.74 | 63.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100~120 | 61.45 | 62.51 | 1.06 | 62.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
中龄林 Middle-aged forest | 0~20 | 72.68 | 79.70 | 7.02 | 79.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20~40 | 42.01 | 43.37 | 1.36 | 43.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
幼龄林 Young forest | 0~20 | 42.53 | 52.74 | 10.21 | 52.53 |
雨强 Rainfall intensities (mm·min-1) | 100 min规定时间内,成熟林坡积物土壤所取土柱累计出流流量 Accumulative outflow of mature forest in the settled time of 100 min (ml) | ||
---|---|---|---|
样地D原状土柱 Undisturbed column of plot D | 样地E原状土柱 Undisturbed column of plot E | 对照过筛填充土柱 Corresponding repacked column | |
0.22 | 305 | 493 | 59 |
0.50 | 593 | 542 | 82 |
1.00 | 702 | 601 | 98 |
Table 2 Accumulative outflow of the undisturbed column and corresponding repacked column in the settled time of 100 min at rainfall intensities of 0.22, 0.50 and 1.00 mm·min-1
雨强 Rainfall intensities (mm·min-1) | 100 min规定时间内,成熟林坡积物土壤所取土柱累计出流流量 Accumulative outflow of mature forest in the settled time of 100 min (ml) | ||
---|---|---|---|
样地D原状土柱 Undisturbed column of plot D | 样地E原状土柱 Undisturbed column of plot E | 对照过筛填充土柱 Corresponding repacked column | |
0.22 | 305 | 493 | 59 |
0.50 | 593 | 542 | 82 |
1.00 | 702 | 601 | 98 |
Fig.6 Soil moisture change of the undisturbed column in the zones of litters and moss of mature forest's plot D at rainfall intensities of 0.50 mm·min-1
Fig.7 Soil moisture change of the undisturbed column in the zones of litters and moss of mature forest's plot D at rainfall intensities of 1.00 mm·min-1
Fig.8 The schematic graph of accumulative outflow and time in the zones of soil, litters and moss of mature forest's plot D at rainfall intensities of 0.50 mm·min-1
差异源 Differential source | SS | 自由度df | MS | F | F crit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Inter-group | 0.004 443 271 | 1 | 0.004 443 271 | 3.235 885 9 | 4.46 |
组内Intra-group | 0.010 984 988 | 8 | 0.001 373 124 | ||
总计Total | 0.015 428 259 | 9 |
Table 3 The square deviation analysis of effects of the upper and lower of the zones of litters and moss on soil moisture at the rainfall intensity of 0.50 mm·min-1
差异源 Differential source | SS | 自由度df | MS | F | F crit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Inter-group | 0.004 443 271 | 1 | 0.004 443 271 | 3.235 885 9 | 4.46 |
组内Intra-group | 0.010 984 988 | 8 | 0.001 373 124 | ||
总计Total | 0.015 428 259 | 9 |
差异源 Differential source | SS | 自由度df | MS | F | F crit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Inter-group | 0.004 429 688 | 1 | 0.004 429 688 | 8.036 300 0 | 4.26 |
组内Intra-group | 0.013 228 958 | 24 | 0.000 551 207 | ||
总计Total | 0.017 658 646 | 25 |
Table 4 The square deviation analysis of effects of the upper and lower of the zones of litters and moss on soil moisture at the rainfall intensity of 1.00 mm·min-1
差异源 Differential source | SS | 自由度df | MS | F | F crit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Inter-group | 0.004 429 688 | 1 | 0.004 429 688 | 8.036 300 0 | 4.26 |
组内Intra-group | 0.013 228 958 | 24 | 0.000 551 207 | ||
总计Total | 0.017 658 646 | 25 |
Fig.9 The schematic graph of the relation of accumulative outflow and time in the zones of soil, litters and moss of mature forest's plot D at rainfall intensities of 1.00 mm·min-1 Legends see Fig. 8
差异源 Differential source | SS | 自由度df | MS | F | p | F crit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Inter-group | 0.048 492 | 1 | 0.048 492 | 5.471 513 | 0.023 45 | 4.038 384 |
组内Intra-group | 0.434 267 | 49 | 0.008 863 | |||
总计Total | 0.482 759 | 50 |
Table 5 The square deviation analysis of effects of the zones of litters and moss on soil moisture at the rainfall intensity of 0.50 mm·min-1
差异源 Differential source | SS | 自由度df | MS | F | p | F crit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Inter-group | 0.048 492 | 1 | 0.048 492 | 5.471 513 | 0.023 45 | 4.038 384 |
组内Intra-group | 0.434 267 | 49 | 0.008 863 | |||
总计Total | 0.482 759 | 50 |
差异源 Differential source | SS | 自由度df | MS | F | p | F crit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Inter-group | 0.531 891 | 1 | 0.531 891 | 29.115 960 | 1.87E-06 | 4.034 320 |
组内Intra-group | 0.913 401 | 50 | 0.018 268 | |||
总计Total | 1.445 291 | 51 |
Table 6 The square deviation analysis of effects of the zones of litters and moss on soil moisture at the rainfall intensity of 1.00 mm·min-1
差异源 Differential source | SS | 自由度df | MS | F | p | F crit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Inter-group | 0.531 891 | 1 | 0.531 891 | 29.115 960 | 1.87E-06 | 4.034 320 |
组内Intra-group | 0.913 401 | 50 | 0.018 268 | |||
总计Total | 1.445 291 | 51 |
Fig.10 The schematic graph of velocity of outflow in the zones of soil, litters and moss and undisturbed column of mature forest's plot D at rainfall intensity of 0.50 mm·min-1
Fig.11 The schematic graph of velocity of outflow in the zones of soil, litters and moss and undisturbed column of mature forest's plot D at rainfall intensity of 1.00 mm·min-1 Legends see Fig. 10
根系类型 Type | 土层 Soil (cm) | ≤1 mm | 1~3 mm | 3~5 mm | 5~10 mm | 10~30 mm | 30~50 mm | 50~100 mm | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | ||
峨眉冷杉 Abies fabric | 0~20 | 4 284 | 42 | 7 530 | 87 | 436 | 40 | 840 | 149 | 630 | 432 | 116 | 342 | 172 | 2 530 |
20~40 | 1 270 | 13 | 1 940 | 68 | 453 | 38 | 354 | 151 | 444 | 404 | 72 | 158 | 0 | 0 | |
40~60 | 120 | 57 | 75 | 81 | 12 | 184 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
60~100 | 75 | 36 | 24 | 18 | 25 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
冬瓜杨 Populus purdomii | 0~20 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 050 | |
20~40 | 521 | 6 | 143 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 13 | 20 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 105 | |
40~60 | 226 | 6 | 220 | 8 | 50 | 6 | 180 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 1 250 | |
60~100 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 450 | 0 | 0 | |
杜鹃 Rhododendron | 0~20 | 6 596 | 36 | 4 010 | 43 | 309 | 35 | 321 | 70 | 110 | 350 | 60 | 173 | 15 | 600 |
20~40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 200 | 0 | 0 | |
40~60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
60~100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 7 The biomass of the roots of Abies fabric, Populus purdomii and Rhododendron
根系类型 Type | 土层 Soil (cm) | ≤1 mm | 1~3 mm | 3~5 mm | 5~10 mm | 10~30 mm | 30~50 mm | 50~100 mm | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | 根长 Length (cm) | 根重 Weight (g) | ||
峨眉冷杉 Abies fabric | 0~20 | 4 284 | 42 | 7 530 | 87 | 436 | 40 | 840 | 149 | 630 | 432 | 116 | 342 | 172 | 2 530 |
20~40 | 1 270 | 13 | 1 940 | 68 | 453 | 38 | 354 | 151 | 444 | 404 | 72 | 158 | 0 | 0 | |
40~60 | 120 | 57 | 75 | 81 | 12 | 184 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
60~100 | 75 | 36 | 24 | 18 | 25 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
冬瓜杨 Populus purdomii | 0~20 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 050 | |
20~40 | 521 | 6 | 143 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 13 | 20 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 105 | |
40~60 | 226 | 6 | 220 | 8 | 50 | 6 | 180 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 1 250 | |
60~100 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 450 | 0 | 0 | |
杜鹃 Rhododendron | 0~20 | 6 596 | 36 | 4 010 | 43 | 309 | 35 | 321 | 70 | 110 | 350 | 60 | 173 | 15 | 600 |
20~40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 200 | 0 | 0 | |
40~60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
60~100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[1] | Andreini MS, Steenhuis TS (1990). Preferential flow paths under conventional and conservation tillage. Geoderma, 46,85-102. |
[2] | Bauters TWJ, DiCarlo DA, Steenhuis TS, Parlange JY (1998). Preferential flow in water-repellent sands. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62,1185-1190. |
[3] | Beven K, Germann P (1982). Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resources Research, 18,1311-1325. |
[4] | Beven K, Germann P (1981). Water flow in soil macropores. 2. A combined flow model. Journal of Soil Science, 32,15-29. |
[5] | Beven K (1991). Modeling preferential flow: an uncertain future? In: Gish TJ, Shirmohannadi A eds. Preferential Flow. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, 1-11. |
[6] | Bouma J, Belmans CFM, Dekker LW (1982). Water infiltration and redistribution in a silt loam subsoil with vertical worm channels. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46,917-921. |
[7] | Bouma J (1981). Soil morphology and preferential flow along macropores. Agriculture Water Management, 3,235-250. |
[8] | de Rooij GH (1995). A three-region analytical model of solute leaching in a soil with a water repellent top layer. Water Resource Research, 31,2701-2707. |
[9] | de Rooij GH, de Vries P (1996). Solute leaching in a sandy soil with a water-repellent surface layer: a simulation. Geoderma, 70,253-263. |
[10] | Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (1996). Variation in water content and wetting patterns in Dutch water repellent peaty clay and clayey peat soils. Catena, 28,89-105. |
[11] | Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Wendroth O, Jarvis N (1999). Moisture distributions and wetting rates of soils at experimental fields in the Netherlands, France, Sweden and Germany. Journal of Hydrology, 215,4-22. |
[12] | Edwards WM, Shipitalo MJ, Owens LB, Norton LD (1990). Effect of Lumbricus terrestris L. burrow on hydrology of continuous no-till corn fields . Geoderma, 46,73-84. |
[13] | Elsenbeer H, Lack A, Cassel K (1995). Chemical fingerprints of hydrological compartments and flow paths at La Cuenca, western Amazonia. Water Resources Research, 31,3051-3058. |
[14] | Elsenbeer H, Lack A (1996). Hydrometric and hydrochemical evidence for fast flowpaths at La Cuenca, western Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology, 180,237-250. |
[15] | Flühler H, Ursino N, Bundt M (2001). The preferential flow syndrom—a buzzword or a scientific problem. In: David B, Kevin K eds. International Symposium on Preferential Flow 2nd edn. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, 21-24. |
[16] | Flury M (1996). Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils—a review. Journal of Environment Quality, 25,25-45. |
[17] | Flury M, Flühler H, Jury W A, Leuenberger J (1994). Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: a field study. Water Resources Research, 30,1945-1954. |
[18] | Freeze RA, Banner J (1970). The mechanisms of natural groundwater recharge and discharge. 2. Large column experiments and field measurements. Water Resources Research, 6,138-155. |
[19] |
Gerrit H, de Rooij, Stagnitti F (2002). Spatial and temporal distribution of solute leaching in heterogeneous soils: analysis and application to multisampler lysimeter data. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 54,329-346.
DOI URL PMID |
[20] | Glass RJ, Steenhuis TS, Parlange JY (1989). Mechanism for finger persistence in homogeneous unsaturated porous media: theory and verification. Soil Science, 148,60-70. |
[21] | Helling CS, Gish TJ (1991). Physical and chemical processes affecting preferential flow. In: Gish TJ, Shirmohammadi A eds. Preferential Flow. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan,77-86. |
[22] | Hendrickx JMH, Dekker LW, Boersma OH (1993). Unstable wetting fronts in water repellent field soils. Journal of Environment Quality, 22,109-118. |
[23] | Hill DE, Parlange JY (1972). Wetting front instability in layered soils. Soil Science Society of America Process, 36,697-702. |
[24] | Hornberger GM, Germann PF, Beven KJ (1991). Throughflow and solute transport in an isolated sloping soil block in a forested catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 124,81-99. |
[25] | Hua M(华孟), Wang J(王坚) (1993). Soil Physics(土壤物理学). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[26] | Huang JH(黄建辉), Han XG(韩兴国), Chen LZ(陈灵芝) (1999). Advances in the research of (fine) root biomass in forest ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 19,270-277. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Jamison VC (1945). The penetration of irrigation and rain water into sandy soils of central Florida. Soil Science Society of America Pro-cess, 10,25-29. |
[28] | Jarvis N (1998). Modeling the impact of preferential flow on non-point source pollution. In: Selim HH, Ma L eds. Physical Non-equilibrium in Soils: Modeling and Application. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, Michigan, 195-221. |
[29] | Jones JAA (1971). Soil piping and stream channel initiation. Water Resources Research, 7,602-610. |
[30] | Kung KJS (1990a). Preferential flow in a sandy vadose zone soil. 1. Field observation. Geoderma, 46,51-58. |
[31] | Kung KJS (1990b). Preferential flow in a sandy vadose zone soil: 2. Mechanism and implications. Geoderma, 46,59-71. |
[32] | Lawes JB, Gilbert JH, Warington R (1882). On the Amount and Composition of the Rain and Drainage Water Collected at Rothamsted. Williams, Clowes and Sons, London, UK. |
[33] | Lissey A (1971). Depression-focused transient groundwater flow patterns in Manitoba. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 9,333-341. |
[34] | Mabuchi T (1961). Infiltration and ensuing percolation in columns of laggard glass particles packed in laboratory. Transactions Agriculture Engineering Society of Japan,13-19. |
[35] | Miller DE, Gardner WH (1962). Water infiltration into stratified soil. Soil Science Society of America Process, 26,115-119. |
[36] | Nieber JL, Misra D (1995). Modeling flow and transport in heterogeneous, dual-porosity drained soils. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 9,217-237. |
[37] | Nieber JL, van den Eertwegh GAPH, Feddes RA (1998). Modeling multidimensional water flow and solute transport in dual-porosity soils. In: In: Brown LC ed. Drainage in the 21st Century: Food Production and the Environment. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Drainage Symposium. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan,227-235. |
[38] | Quisenberry VL, Phillips RE, Zeleznik JM (1994). Spatial distribution of water and chloride macropore flow in a well-structured soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58,1294-1300. |
[39] | Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW, Nieber JL (1998). Modeling and field evidence of finger formation and finger recurrence in a water repellent sandy soil. Water Resources Research, 34,555-567. |
[40] | Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW (1993). Preferential flow mechanism in a water repellent sandy soil. Water Resources Research, 29,2183-2193. |
[41] | Ritsema CJ, Nieber JL, Dekker LW (1998). Stable or unstable wetting fronts in water repellent soils—effect of antecedent soil moisture content. Soil & Tillage Research, 47,111-123. |
[42] | Roth K (1995). Steady state flow in an unsaturated, two-dimensional, macroscopically homogeneous, Millersimilar medium. Water Resources Research, 31,2127-2140. |
[43] | Shipitalo MJ, Edwards WM, Dick WA, Owens LB (1990). Initial storm effects on macropore transport of surface applied chemicals in no-till soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54,1530-1536. |
[44] | Skopp J (1981). Comment on “Micro-, meso-, and macroporosity of soil”. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45,1246. |
[45] | Tani M (1997). Runoff generation processes estimated from hydrological observation on a steep forested hillslope with a thin soil layer. Journal of Hydrology, 200,84-109. |
[46] | van Dam JC, Hendrickx JMH, van Ommen HC (1990). Water and solute movement in a coarse-textured water-repellent field soil. Journal of Hydrology, 120,359-379. |
[47] | Walsh RPD, Howells KA (1988). Soil pipes and their role in runoff generation and chemical denudation in humid tropical catchment in Dominica. Earth Surface Process and Landforms, 13,9-17. |
[48] | Wang Z, Feyen J, Ritsema CJ (1998). Susceptibility and predictability of conditions for preferential flow. Water Resources Research, 34,2169-2182. |
[49] | Wildenschild D, Vaz CMP, Rivers ML, Rikard D (2000). Using x-ray computed tomography in hydrology: systems, resolutions, and limitations. Journal of Hydrology, 267,285-297. |
[50] | Woo M, diCenzo P (1988). Pipe flow in James Bay coastal wetlands. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 25,625-629. |
[51] | Zhao YT (赵玉涛)(2002). Study on hydrological precess and modeling of dark coniferous forest ecosystem of upper reach of Yangtze River. PhD dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[52] | Zhang HJ(张洪江), Wang YJ(王玉杰), Bei YZ(北原曜) (2000). A study in pipe flow on the slope of granite region of the three-gorge of Yangtze River. Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 22(5),53-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | WANG Ming-Ming,LIU Xin-Ping,HE Yu-Hui,ZHANG Tong-Hui,WEI Jing,Chelmge ,SUN Shan-Shan. How enclosure influences restored plant community changes of different initial types in Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(8): 672-684. |
[2] | Xi LI, Fang WANG, Yang CAO, Shou-Zhang PENG, Yun-Ming CHEN. Soil carbon storage and its determinants in the forests of Shaanxi Province, China [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(9): 953-963. |
[3] | Jian-Rong GUO, Xian-Chong WAN. Circadian rhythm of root pressure in popular and its driving factors [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(3): 369-377. |
[4] | MA Jiang-Ming, LIU Shi-Rong, SHI Zuo-Min, ZHANG Yuan-Dong, MIAO Ning. NATURAL REGENERATION OF ABIES FAXONIANA ALONG RESTORATION GRADIENTS OF SUBALPINE DARK CONIFEROUS FOREST IN WESTERN SICHUAN, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(4): 646-657. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn