Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 650-655.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00067

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Applicability of modified exponential model in photosynthetic-CO2 response curve of barley

LUO Fu-Yan1*, CHEN Wei-Ying1,2*, and CHEN Zhen-Yong1   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan 637009, China;

    2Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2013-01-11 Revised:2013-05-19 Online:2013-07-05 Published:2013-07-01
  • Contact: LUO Fu-Yan,ying weiCHEN;


Aims The photosynthetic-CO2 response curve is an important tool for understanding the response of plants to CO2. Common models of photosynthetic-CO2 response curve can not calculate the max net photosynthetic rate accurately. In our study, we used a new model called the modified exponential model to simulate the relationship between net photosynthetic rate and CO2 concentration of barley. We then compared the differences and accuracies with the modified rectangular hyperbola model, rectangular hyperbola model, nonrectangular hyperbola model and exponential model. Our objectives were to test the merit and precision of these models and provide reference for selecting the best models for the photosynthetic-CO2 response curves of plants.
Methods The CO2-response curves of Tibetan hulless barley were recorded with an infrared gas analyzer system (LI-6400). The measured data were used to simulate and test the precision of the models. Mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to evaluate the precision of the models. Some predicted physiological parameters of the four models were compared with the measured values.
Important findings The photosynthetic-CO2 response curves of barley were best described by the modified exponential model. The CO2 saturation point and maximum net photosynthetic rate of barley obtained by the modified exponential model were 25.9 μmol CO2·m–2·s–1 and 484 μmol·mol–1, respectively.

[1]Akhkha A, Reid I, Clarke DD, Dominy P (2001). Photosynthetic light-response curves determined with the leaf oxygen electrode: minimisation of errors and significance of the convexity term. Planta, 214, 135–141. Crossref
[2] Baly EC (1935). The kinetics of photosynthesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 117, 218–239. Crossref
[3] Chen WY, Chen ZY, Luo FY, Peng ZS, Yu MQ (2012). Comparison of the differences between modified exponential model and three classical light-response curve models. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 1277–1285. (in Chinese with English abstract) [陈卫英, 陈真勇, 罗辅燕, 彭正松, 余懋群 (2012). 光响应曲线的指数改进模型与常用模型比较. 植物生态学报, 36, 1277–1285.] Crossref
[4] Chen ZY, Peng ZS, Yang J, Chen WY, Ouyang ZM (2011). A mathematical model for describing light-response curves in Nicotiana tabacum L. Photosynthetica, 49, 467–471. Crossref
[5] Durchan M, Vácha F, Krieger-Liszkay A (2001). Effects of severe CO2 starvation on the photosynthetic electron transport chain in tobacco plants. Photosynthesis Research, 68, 203–213. Crossref
[6] Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149, 78–90. Crossref
[7] Godbold DL, Berntson GM (1997). Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration changes ectomycorrhizal morphotype assemblages in Betula papyrifera. Tree Physiology, 17, 347–350. Crossref
[8] Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991). An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynthesis Research, 27, 169–178. Crossref
[9] Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992). Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell & Environment, 15, 271–282. Crossref
[10] Jiao YM, Wei XL (2010). Application of two photosynthetic light response and CO2 response curve-fitting models on karst species. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 38(4), 162– 167, 170. (in Chinese with English abstract) [焦裕媚, 韦小丽 (2010). 两种光响应及CO2响应模型在喀斯特树种中的应用. 贵州农业科学, 38(4), 162–167, 170.] Crossref
[11] Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003). Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 2393–2401. Crossref
[12] Sun CX, Hao JJ, Wang J, Miu L, Chen ZH, Qi H (2010). Responses of photosynthetic physiological characteristics of two transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties to CO2 concentration. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 504–510. (in Chinese with English abstract) [孙彩霞, 郝健均, 王杰, 缪璐, 陈振华, 齐华 (2010). 两个品种转基因抗虫棉光合生理的CO2响应. 生态学报, 30, 504–510.] Crossref
[13] von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981). Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 153, 376–387. Crossref
[14] Wang ZC, Kang SZ, Jensen RC, Liu FL (2012). Alternate partial root-zone irrigation reduces bundle-sheath cell leakage to CO2 and enhances photosynthetic capacity in maize leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 1145–1153. Crossref
[15] Watling JR, Press MC, Quick WP (2000). Elevated CO2 induces biochemical and ultrastructural changes in leaves of the C4 cereal sorghum. Plant Physiology, 123, 1143–1152. Crossref
[16] Ye ZP (2007). A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica, 45, 637–640. Crossref
[17] Ye ZP (2010). A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 727–740. (in Chinese with English abstract) [叶子飘 (2010). 光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 34, 727–740.] Crossref
[18] Ye ZP, Wang JL (2009). Comparison and analysis of light-response models of plant photosynthesis. Journal of Jinggangshan University (Science and Technology), 30(2), 9–13. (in Chinese with English abstract) [叶子飘, 王建林 (2009). 植物光合-光响应模型的比较分析. 井冈山学院学报(自然科学版), 30(2), 9–13.] Crossref
[19] Ye ZP, Yu Q (2008). Photosynthetic response to irradiance and CO2 concentration for flag leaves of winter wheat. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 29(3), 33–37. (in Chinese with English abstract) [叶子飘, 于强 (2008). 冬小麦旗叶光合速率对光强度和CO2浓度的响应. 扬州大学学报(自然科学版), 29(3), 33–37.] Crossref
[20] Ye ZP, Yu Q (2009). A comparison of response curves of w inter wheat photosynthesis to flag leaf intercellular and air CO2 concentrations. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 2233–2238. (in Chinese with English abstract) [叶子飘, 于强 (2009). 光合作用对胞间和大气CO2响应曲线的比较. 生态学杂志, 28, 2233–2238.] Crossref
[21] Zhao X, Li YG, Liu XH, Zhu GQ (2011). Photosynthetic-CO2 response of seedlings of different Styrax tonkinesis provenances. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (Natural Sciences Edition), 33, 1128–1133. (in Chinese with English abstract) [赵勋, 李因刚, 柳新红, 朱光权 (2011). 白花树不同种源苗木光合-CO2响应. 江西农业大学学报, 33, 1128–1133.] Crossref
[22] Zuo WY, He JS, Han M, Ji CJ, Dan FBF, Fang JY (2005). Responses of plant stomata to elevated CO2 and temperature: observations from 10 plant species grown in temperature and CO2 gradients. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25, 565–574. (in Chinese with English abstract) [左闻韵, 贺金生, 韩梅, 吉成均, Dan FBF, 方精云 (2005). 植物气孔对大气CO2浓度和温度升高的反应——基于在CO2浓度和温度梯度中生长的10种植物的观测. 生态学报, 25, 565–574.] Crossref
No related articles found!
Full text



[1] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 19 .
[2] Xiao Xiao and Cheng Zhen-qi. Chloroplast 4.5 S ribosomol DNA. II Gene and Origin[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(06): 7 -9 .
[3] CAO Cui-LingLI Sheng-Xiu. Effect of Nitrogen Level on the Photosynthetic Rate, NR Activity and the Contents of Nucleic Acid of Wheat Leaf in the Stage of Reproduction[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2003, 20(03): 319 -324 .
[4] SONG Li-Ying TAN Zheng GAO Feng DENG Shu-Yan. Advances in in vitro Culture of Cucurbitaceae in China[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2004, 21(03): 360 -366 .
[5] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 76 .
[6] LI Jun-De YANG Jian WANG Yu-Fei. Aquatic Plants in the Miocene Shanwang Flora[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2000, 17(专辑): 261 .
[7] Sun Zhen-xiao Xia Guang-min Chen Hui-min. Karyotype Analysis of Psathyrostachys juncea[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1995, 12(01): 56 .
[8] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 8 -9 .
[9] Yunpu Zheng;Jiancheng Zhao * ;Bingchang Zhang;Lin Li;Yuanming Zhang . Advances on Ecological Studies of Algae and Mosses in Biological Soil Crust[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2009, 44(03): 371 -378 .
[10] Zili Wu, Mengyao Yu, Lu Chen, Jing Wei, Xiaoqin Wang, Yong Hu, Yan Yan, Ping Wan. Transcriptome Analysis of Physcomitrella patens Response to Cadmium Stress by Bayesian Network[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2015, 50(2): 171 -179 .