Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 302-310.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.02.007
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Dong-Mei1, SUN Pei-Guang2, SHEN Xi-Huan3, RU Guang-Xin2
Received:
2007-12-18
Accepted:
2008-07-03
Online:
2009-12-18
Published:
2009-03-31
ZHANG Dong-Mei, SUN Pei-Guang, SHEN Xi-Huan, RU Guang-Xin. PATERNITY ANALYSIS OF OPEN- AND CONTROL-POLLINATED SEEDS COLLECTED FROM A SEED ORCHARD OF PINUS TABULAEFORMIS[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(2): 302-310.
母树 Mother | 父本来源 Father | 种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度 80% signifcance level) | 种子数 Number of seed (<80%置信度 80% signifcance level) | 花粉贡献率 Contribute rate of pollen (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 花粉活力 Germination rate of pollen (%) | 距离母树距离 Distance to the maternal tree (m) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11#母树上用于父本分析的自由授粉种子(共69粒) Paternity analysis for 69 open-pollinated seeds of clone 11# | 共14个无性系 Total 14 clones | 21# | 1(*),5(+) | 3 | 22.2 | 90.6 | 15 |
17# | 3(+) | 5 | 11.1 | 91.4 | 7 | ||
20# | 3(+) | 1 | 11.1 | 89.2 | 46 | ||
40# | 1(*),2(+) | 1 | 11.1 | 88 | 16 | ||
16# | 2(+) | 3 | 7.41 | 89.2 | 44 | ||
23# | 2(*) | 0 | 7.41 | 88.8 | 26 | ||
7# | 1(+) | 3 | 3.7 | 94.4 | 50、47 | ||
14# | 1(+) | 2 | 3.7 | 60.8 | 38 | ||
30# | 1(+) | 2 | 3.7 | 73 | 18 | ||
12# | 1(+) | 1 | 3.7 | 87 | 5 | ||
13# | 1(+) | 1 | 3.7 | 78.6 | 10 | ||
6# | 1(+) | 0 | 3.7 | 80 | 45 | ||
3# | 1(+) | 0 | 3.7 | 96 | 7 | ||
22# | 1(+) | 0 | 3.7 | 87.2 | 23 | ||
小计 Subtotal | 23(+),4(*) | 22 | 平均 Mean 26.47 | ||||
共8个无性系 Total 8 clones | 2# | 1 | 41、43、44 | ||||
8# | 3 | 19 | |||||
19# | 1 | 39 | |||||
35# | 1 | 27、28 | |||||
36# | 1 | 21 | |||||
38# | 1 | 35 | |||||
44# | 1 | 36 | |||||
45# | 1 | 31 | |||||
小计 Subtotal | 10 | ||||||
不能判断来源 Unknown the father | 10 |
Table 1 Paternity analysis for 69 open-pollinated seeds of clone 11#
母树 Mother | 父本来源 Father | 种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度 80% signifcance level) | 种子数 Number of seed (<80%置信度 80% signifcance level) | 花粉贡献率 Contribute rate of pollen (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 花粉活力 Germination rate of pollen (%) | 距离母树距离 Distance to the maternal tree (m) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11#母树上用于父本分析的自由授粉种子(共69粒) Paternity analysis for 69 open-pollinated seeds of clone 11# | 共14个无性系 Total 14 clones | 21# | 1(*),5(+) | 3 | 22.2 | 90.6 | 15 |
17# | 3(+) | 5 | 11.1 | 91.4 | 7 | ||
20# | 3(+) | 1 | 11.1 | 89.2 | 46 | ||
40# | 1(*),2(+) | 1 | 11.1 | 88 | 16 | ||
16# | 2(+) | 3 | 7.41 | 89.2 | 44 | ||
23# | 2(*) | 0 | 7.41 | 88.8 | 26 | ||
7# | 1(+) | 3 | 3.7 | 94.4 | 50、47 | ||
14# | 1(+) | 2 | 3.7 | 60.8 | 38 | ||
30# | 1(+) | 2 | 3.7 | 73 | 18 | ||
12# | 1(+) | 1 | 3.7 | 87 | 5 | ||
13# | 1(+) | 1 | 3.7 | 78.6 | 10 | ||
6# | 1(+) | 0 | 3.7 | 80 | 45 | ||
3# | 1(+) | 0 | 3.7 | 96 | 7 | ||
22# | 1(+) | 0 | 3.7 | 87.2 | 23 | ||
小计 Subtotal | 23(+),4(*) | 22 | 平均 Mean 26.47 | ||||
共8个无性系 Total 8 clones | 2# | 1 | 41、43、44 | ||||
8# | 3 | 19 | |||||
19# | 1 | 39 | |||||
35# | 1 | 27、28 | |||||
36# | 1 | 21 | |||||
38# | 1 | 35 | |||||
44# | 1 | 36 | |||||
45# | 1 | 31 | |||||
小计 Subtotal | 10 | ||||||
不能判断来源 Unknown the father | 10 |
母树 Mother | 父本来源 Father | 种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 种子数 Number of seed (<80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 花粉贡献率 Contribute rate of pollen (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 花粉活力 Germination rate of pollen (%) | 距离母树 距离 Distance to the maternal tree (m) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24#母树上用于父本分析的自由授粉种子(共92粒) Paternity analysis for 92 open-pollinated seeds of clone 24 | 共22个无性系 Total 22 clones | 23# | 4(*),4(+) | 8 | 17.02 | 88.8 | 40、36 |
2# | 5(+) | 3 | 10.64 | 87.2 | 16 | ||
22# | 5(+) | 1 | 10.64 | 87.2 | 10、36、45 | ||
1# | 4(+) | 1 | 8.51 | 89.8 | 42、45、47 | ||
3# | 4(+) | 0 | 8.51 | 96 | 15 | ||
8# | 3(+) | 6 | 6.38 | 75.2 | 14 | ||
5# | 2(+) | 2 | 4.26 | 87.8 | 18 | ||
36# | 2(+) | 1 | 4.26 | 71.2 | 14 | ||
39# | 1(+) | 3 | 2.13 | 79.4 | 32 | ||
11# | 1(+) | 2 | 2.13 | 77.8 | 29、31、32 | ||
37# | 1(+) | 1 | 2.13 | 88 | 26 | ||
4# | 1(+) | 1 | 2.13 | 91.6 | 85 | ||
19# | 1(+) | 1 | 2.13 | 89.4 | 25 | ||
13# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 78.6 | 23 | ||
14# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 60.8 | 21、22 | ||
17# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 91.4 | 5 | ||
27# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 89.2 | 14 | ||
28# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 87.2 | 20 | ||
38# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 73.4 | 10 | ||
6# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 80 | 21 | ||
7# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 94.4 | 20、21 | ||
30# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 73 | 8 | ||
小计 Subtotal | 4(*),43(+) | 30 | 平均 Mean 28.9 | ||||
共4个无性系 Total 4 clones | 16# | 1 | |||||
40# | 1 | ||||||
41# | 2 | ||||||
44# | 2 | ||||||
小计subtotal | 6 | ||||||
不能判断来源 Unknown the father | 9 |
Table 2 Paternity analysis for 92 open-pollinated seeds of clone 24#
母树 Mother | 父本来源 Father | 种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 种子数 Number of seed (<80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 花粉贡献率 Contribute rate of pollen (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 花粉活力 Germination rate of pollen (%) | 距离母树 距离 Distance to the maternal tree (m) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24#母树上用于父本分析的自由授粉种子(共92粒) Paternity analysis for 92 open-pollinated seeds of clone 24 | 共22个无性系 Total 22 clones | 23# | 4(*),4(+) | 8 | 17.02 | 88.8 | 40、36 |
2# | 5(+) | 3 | 10.64 | 87.2 | 16 | ||
22# | 5(+) | 1 | 10.64 | 87.2 | 10、36、45 | ||
1# | 4(+) | 1 | 8.51 | 89.8 | 42、45、47 | ||
3# | 4(+) | 0 | 8.51 | 96 | 15 | ||
8# | 3(+) | 6 | 6.38 | 75.2 | 14 | ||
5# | 2(+) | 2 | 4.26 | 87.8 | 18 | ||
36# | 2(+) | 1 | 4.26 | 71.2 | 14 | ||
39# | 1(+) | 3 | 2.13 | 79.4 | 32 | ||
11# | 1(+) | 2 | 2.13 | 77.8 | 29、31、32 | ||
37# | 1(+) | 1 | 2.13 | 88 | 26 | ||
4# | 1(+) | 1 | 2.13 | 91.6 | 85 | ||
19# | 1(+) | 1 | 2.13 | 89.4 | 25 | ||
13# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 78.6 | 23 | ||
14# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 60.8 | 21、22 | ||
17# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 91.4 | 5 | ||
27# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 89.2 | 14 | ||
28# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 87.2 | 20 | ||
38# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 73.4 | 10 | ||
6# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 80 | 21 | ||
7# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 94.4 | 20、21 | ||
30# | 1(+) | 0 | 2.13 | 73 | 8 | ||
小计 Subtotal | 4(*),43(+) | 30 | 平均 Mean 28.9 | ||||
共4个无性系 Total 4 clones | 16# | 1 | |||||
40# | 1 | ||||||
41# | 2 | ||||||
44# | 2 | ||||||
小计subtotal | 6 | ||||||
不能判断来源 Unknown the father | 9 |
clone 11# | clone 24# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
候选父本 Candidate father | 子代个数 Number of seed | 种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 候选父本 Candidate father | 子代个数 Number of seed | 种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) |
50# | 17 | 7(+) | 25# | 14 | 5(+) |
7# | 13 | 6(+) | 7# | 5 | 5(+) |
25# | 4 | 4(+) | 33# | 3 | 3(+) |
33# | 7 | 4(+) | 50# | 2 | 1(+),1(*) |
5# | 4 | 3(+) | 34# | 4 | 1(+),1(*) |
37# | 5 | 3(+) | 2# | 2 | 2(+) |
19# | 4 | 3(+) | 3# | 1 | 2(+) |
2# | 3 | 2(+) | 48# | 2 | 1(*) |
35# | 5 | 1(+) | 26# | 1 | 1(+) |
34# | 2 | 1(*) | 41# | 1 | 1(+) |
41# | 2 | 1(+) | 44# | 2 | 1(+) |
44# | 2 | 1(+) | 47# | 1 | 1(+) |
47# | 1 | 1(+) | 16# | 1 | |
16# | 2 | 1(+) | |||
17# | 4 | 1(+) | |||
48# | 1 | ||||
24# | 2 | ||||
26# | 1 | ||||
28# | 1 | ||||
3# | 1 | ||||
总计 Total | 81 | 39 | 39 | 26 |
Table 3 Paternity analysis for control-pollinated seeds of clone 11# and 24#
clone 11# | clone 24# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
候选父本 Candidate father | 子代个数 Number of seed | 种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) | 候选父本 Candidate father | 子代个数 Number of seed | 种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level) |
50# | 17 | 7(+) | 25# | 14 | 5(+) |
7# | 13 | 6(+) | 7# | 5 | 5(+) |
25# | 4 | 4(+) | 33# | 3 | 3(+) |
33# | 7 | 4(+) | 50# | 2 | 1(+),1(*) |
5# | 4 | 3(+) | 34# | 4 | 1(+),1(*) |
37# | 5 | 3(+) | 2# | 2 | 2(+) |
19# | 4 | 3(+) | 3# | 1 | 2(+) |
2# | 3 | 2(+) | 48# | 2 | 1(*) |
35# | 5 | 1(+) | 26# | 1 | 1(+) |
34# | 2 | 1(*) | 41# | 1 | 1(+) |
41# | 2 | 1(+) | 44# | 2 | 1(+) |
44# | 2 | 1(+) | 47# | 1 | 1(+) |
47# | 1 | 1(+) | 16# | 1 | |
16# | 2 | 1(+) | |||
17# | 4 | 1(+) | |||
48# | 1 | ||||
24# | 2 | ||||
26# | 1 | ||||
28# | 1 | ||||
3# | 1 | ||||
总计 Total | 81 | 39 | 39 | 26 |
无性系 Clone | 等体积重 Weight of coequal volume (g) | 花粉粒大小 Size of microspore (μm) | 无性系 Clone | 等体积重 Weight of coequal volume (g) | 花粉粒大小 Size of microspore (μm) | 无性系 Clone | 等体积重 Weight of coequal volume (g) | 花粉粒大小 Size of microspore (μm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1# | 0.840 | 24.145 | 18# | 1.098 | 22.584 | 35# | 0.779 | 24.227 | ||
2# | 1.117 | 19.694 | 19# | 0.925 | 25.608 | 36# | 0.937 | 21.194 | ||
3# | 0.981 | 22.980 | 20# | 0.876 | 23.509 | 37# | 0.884 | 25.636 | ||
4# | 0.922 | 23.103 | 21# | 0.848 | 21.479 | 38# | 0.935 | 22.482 | ||
5# | 1.077 | 21.421 | 22# | 0.99 | 23.013 | 39# | 0.861 | 23.514 | ||
6# | 0.903 | 23.976 | 23# | 1.028 | 23.509 | 40# | 0.895 | 24.633 | ||
7# | 0.901 | 22.284 | 24# | 1.001 | 19.062 | 41# | 1.005 | 22.857 | ||
8# | 1.002 | 20.334 | 25# | 1.008 | 19.524 | 42# | 0.836 | 23.837 | ||
9# | 0.788 | 25.064 | 26# | 0.981 | 23.366 | 43# | 0.962 | 23.213 | ||
10# | 0.998 | 23.838 | 27# | 0.888 | 24.636 | 44# | 0.942 | 23.377 | ||
11# | 0.922 | 22.501 | 28# | 0.845 | 24.776 | 45# | 0.879 | 24.509 | ||
12# | 1.003 | 21.079 | 29# | 0.904 | 23.723 | 46# | 0.982 | 22.256 | ||
13# | 0.92 | 22.357 | 30# | 0.91 | 22.287 | 47# | 0.922 | 23.316 | ||
14# | 0.928 | 23.102 | 31# | 0.908 | 22.324 | 48# | 0.899 | 23.701 | ||
15# | 0.857 | 23.452 | 32# | 0.848 | 22.215 | 50# | 0.835 | 22.758 | ||
16# | 0.891 | 24.048 | 33# | 1.014 | 23.175 | 平均mean | 0.934 | 22.922 | ||
17# | 1.021 | 21.794 | 34# | 1.093 | 21.699 |
Table 4 The shape and weight of coequal volume of pollen
无性系 Clone | 等体积重 Weight of coequal volume (g) | 花粉粒大小 Size of microspore (μm) | 无性系 Clone | 等体积重 Weight of coequal volume (g) | 花粉粒大小 Size of microspore (μm) | 无性系 Clone | 等体积重 Weight of coequal volume (g) | 花粉粒大小 Size of microspore (μm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1# | 0.840 | 24.145 | 18# | 1.098 | 22.584 | 35# | 0.779 | 24.227 | ||
2# | 1.117 | 19.694 | 19# | 0.925 | 25.608 | 36# | 0.937 | 21.194 | ||
3# | 0.981 | 22.980 | 20# | 0.876 | 23.509 | 37# | 0.884 | 25.636 | ||
4# | 0.922 | 23.103 | 21# | 0.848 | 21.479 | 38# | 0.935 | 22.482 | ||
5# | 1.077 | 21.421 | 22# | 0.99 | 23.013 | 39# | 0.861 | 23.514 | ||
6# | 0.903 | 23.976 | 23# | 1.028 | 23.509 | 40# | 0.895 | 24.633 | ||
7# | 0.901 | 22.284 | 24# | 1.001 | 19.062 | 41# | 1.005 | 22.857 | ||
8# | 1.002 | 20.334 | 25# | 1.008 | 19.524 | 42# | 0.836 | 23.837 | ||
9# | 0.788 | 25.064 | 26# | 0.981 | 23.366 | 43# | 0.962 | 23.213 | ||
10# | 0.998 | 23.838 | 27# | 0.888 | 24.636 | 44# | 0.942 | 23.377 | ||
11# | 0.922 | 22.501 | 28# | 0.845 | 24.776 | 45# | 0.879 | 24.509 | ||
12# | 1.003 | 21.079 | 29# | 0.904 | 23.723 | 46# | 0.982 | 22.256 | ||
13# | 0.92 | 22.357 | 30# | 0.91 | 22.287 | 47# | 0.922 | 23.316 | ||
14# | 0.928 | 23.102 | 31# | 0.908 | 22.324 | 48# | 0.899 | 23.701 | ||
15# | 0.857 | 23.452 | 32# | 0.848 | 22.215 | 50# | 0.835 | 22.758 | ||
16# | 0.891 | 24.048 | 33# | 1.014 | 23.175 | 平均mean | 0.934 | 22.922 | ||
17# | 1.021 | 21.794 | 34# | 1.093 | 21.699 |
无性系 Clone | 平均花粉活力 Average value of pollen viability (%) | 无性系 Clone | 平均花粉活力 Average value of pollen viability (%) | 无性系 Clone | 平均花粉活力 Average value of pollen viability (%) | 无性系 Clone | 平均花粉活力 Average value of pollen viability (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3# | 96.0 | 9# | 89.4 | 37# | 88.0 | 39# | 79.4 |
7# | 94.4 | 19# | 89.4 | 44# | 88.0 | 13# | 78.6 |
41# | 93.2 | 16# | 89.2 | 47# | 88.0 | 11# | 77.8 |
50# | 93.0 | 20# | 89.2 | 45# | 87.8 | 29# | 77.0 |
4# | 91.6 | 27# | 89.2 | 5# | 87.8 | 8# | 75.2 |
17# | 91.4 | 18# | 89.0 | 46# | 87.4 | 38# | 73.4 |
25# | 91.4 | 22# | 89.0 | 26# | 87.2 | 30# | 73.0 |
21# | 90.6 | 23# | 88.8 | 2# | 87.2 | 36# | 71.2 |
43# | 90.0 | 35# | 88.6 | 28# | 87.2 | 32# | 65.8 |
1# | 89.8 | 48# | 88.4 | 12# | 87.0 | 14# | 60.8 |
31# | 89.6 | 33# | 88.4 | 6# | 80.0 | 平均mean | 85.5 |
34# | 89.6 | 24# | 88.2 | 10# | 79.6 | ||
42# | 89.6 | 40# | 88.0 | 15# | 79.6 |
Table 5 Average value of pollen viability of 49 clones
无性系 Clone | 平均花粉活力 Average value of pollen viability (%) | 无性系 Clone | 平均花粉活力 Average value of pollen viability (%) | 无性系 Clone | 平均花粉活力 Average value of pollen viability (%) | 无性系 Clone | 平均花粉活力 Average value of pollen viability (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3# | 96.0 | 9# | 89.4 | 37# | 88.0 | 39# | 79.4 |
7# | 94.4 | 19# | 89.4 | 44# | 88.0 | 13# | 78.6 |
41# | 93.2 | 16# | 89.2 | 47# | 88.0 | 11# | 77.8 |
50# | 93.0 | 20# | 89.2 | 45# | 87.8 | 29# | 77.0 |
4# | 91.6 | 27# | 89.2 | 5# | 87.8 | 8# | 75.2 |
17# | 91.4 | 18# | 89.0 | 46# | 87.4 | 38# | 73.4 |
25# | 91.4 | 22# | 89.0 | 26# | 87.2 | 30# | 73.0 |
21# | 90.6 | 23# | 88.8 | 2# | 87.2 | 36# | 71.2 |
43# | 90.0 | 35# | 88.6 | 28# | 87.2 | 32# | 65.8 |
1# | 89.8 | 48# | 88.4 | 12# | 87.0 | 14# | 60.8 |
31# | 89.6 | 33# | 88.4 | 6# | 80.0 | 平均mean | 85.5 |
34# | 89.6 | 24# | 88.2 | 10# | 79.6 | ||
42# | 89.6 | 40# | 88.0 | 15# | 79.6 |
[1] | Ai C (艾畅), Xu LA (徐立安), Lai HL (赖焕林), Huang MR (黄敏仁), Wang ZR (王章荣) (2006). Genetic diversity and paternity analysis of a seed orchard in pinus massoniana. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 42(11),146-150. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Chen XY (陈小勇), Song YC (宋永昌) (2000). Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Cyclobalanopsis glauca. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research(武汉植物学研究), 18,174-180. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] |
De la Rosa R, James CM, Tobutt KR (2004). Using microsatellites for paternity testing in olive progenies. HortScience, 39,351-354.
DOI URL |
[4] | Dow BD, Ashley MV (1996). Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Molecular Ecology, 5,615-627. |
[5] |
Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998). High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. Journal of Heredity, 89,62-70.
DOI URL |
[6] | Elsik CG, Williams CG (2001). Low-copy micro-satellite recovery from a conifer genome. Heoretical and Applied Genetics, 103,1189-1195. |
[7] |
Goto S, Miyahara F, Ide Y (2002). Identification of the male parents of half-sib progeny from Japanese black pine ( Pinus thunbergii Parl.) clonal seed orchard using RAPD markers. Breeding Science, 52,71-77.
DOI URL |
[8] | Grosser C, Vaillancourt R, Potts B, O'Sullivan H (2001). Paternity analysis in a Eucalyptus nitens clonal seed orchard. In:Proceedings Developing the Eucalypts of the Future. Valdivia, Chile. |
[9] | He TH (何田华), Ge S (葛颂) (2001). Mating system, paternity analysis and gene flow in plant populations. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,144-154. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] |
Lian CL, Miwa M, Hogetsu T (2001). Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity, 87,88-98.
DOI URL PMID |
[11] |
Matthews FR, Bramlett DL (1986). Pollen quantity and viability affect seed yields from controlled pollinations of loblolly pine. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 10,78-80.
DOI URL |
[12] | Matthews FR, Bramlett DL (1981). Cyclone pollinator improves loblolly pine seed yields in controlled pollinations. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 5,42-46. |
[13] | Pasonen HL, Pulkkinen P, Käpylä M, Blom A (1989). Pollen-tube growth rate and seed-siring success among Betula pendula clones. New Phytologist, 143,243-251. |
[14] | Webber JE, Yeh FCH (1987). Test of the first-on, first-in pollination hypothesis in coastal Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17,63-68. |
[15] | Zhang DM (张冬梅) (2001). Dynamic Studies on the Mating System and Paternity Analysis of Seeds in a Seed Orchard of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. (油松种子园交配系统及父本分析的动态研究). PhD dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 10-11. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Zhang DM (张冬梅), Shen XH (沈熙环), He TH (何田华) (2001). A paternity analysis of seeds from different clones in a Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. seed orchard. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,166-174. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Zhang DM (张冬梅), Yang Y (杨娅), Shen XH (沈熙环), Ru GX (茹广欣) (2007). Selection of primers and establishment of SSR-PCR relation system on Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Journal of Beijing Foresty University(北京林业大学学报), 29(2),13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Ziegenhagen B, Scholz F, Madaghiele A, Vendramin GG (1998). Chloroplast microsatellites as markers for paternity analysis in Abies alba. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28,317-321. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn