桫椤生态系统生物量与生产力

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.06.010

植物生态学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 1294-1300.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.06.010

桫椤生态系统生物量与生产力

马元丹¹, 江洪¹^,²^,^*(), 余树全², 周国模², 王彬², 彭少麟³, 彭长辉⁴, 常杰⁵, 魏晓华⁶

1 南京大学国际地球系统科学研究所,南京 210093
2 浙江林学院国际空间生态与生态系统生态研究中心,浙江临安 311300
3 中山大学有害生物控制与资源利用国家重点实验室,广州 510275
4 魁北克大学蒙特利尔分校环境科学研究所,蒙特利尔 H3C 3PB,加拿大
5 浙江大学生命科学学院,杭州 310058
6 不列颠哥伦比亚大学地球与环境科学系,基隆拉, V1V 1V7,加拿大

收稿日期:2008-01-17 接受日期:2008-06-03 出版日期:2008-01-17 发布日期:2008-11-30
通讯作者: 江洪
作者简介:*(jianghong@nju.edu.cn)
基金资助:
科技部973项目(2002CB111504);科技部973项目(2002CB410811);科技部973项目(2005CB422208);国家自然科学基金(40671132);科技部数据共享平台建设项目(2006DKA32300-08)

BIOMASS AND PRODUCTIVITY OF A TREE FERN ECOSYSTEM IN CHINA

MA Yuan-Dan¹, JIANG Hong¹^,²^,^*(), YU Shu-Quan², ZHOU Guo-Mo², WANG Bin², PENG Shao-Lin³, PENG Chang-Hui⁴, CHANG Jie⁵, WEI Xiao-Hua⁶

¹International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
²International Research Center of Spatial Ecology and Ecosystem Ecology, Zhejiang Forestry University, Lin’an, Zhejiang 311300, China
³State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
⁴Institute of Environment Sciences, University of Quebec at Montreal, Case Postale 8888, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C3P8, Canada
⁵College of Life Science, Zhejiang University. Hangzhou 310058, China
⁶University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada

Received:2008-01-17 Accepted:2008-06-03 Online:2008-01-17 Published:2008-11-30
Contact: JIANG Hong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

活化石植物是最接近于化石物种的现存相似种, 并且具有一定的生态学保守性。利用活化石植物生态系统来估算陆地生态系统碳固存能力的进化趋势是一种有效的手段。该研究中利用标准地-标准木法调查了活化石物种树蕨桫椤(Alsophila spinulosa)生态系统的生物量和生产力。与现存的裸子植物为优势种的生态系统和被子植物为优势种的生态系统相比, 桫椤的生物量(36.151±8.159 Mg C·hm^-2)和生产力(2.535±0.174 Mg C·hm^-2·a^-1)都比较小。与植物化石调查方法相比, 活化石生态系统生物量和生产力数据在描述古生态系统碳固存能力进化趋势方面提供了一种有意义的手段, 并且有助于进一步的理解全球碳平衡演变的过程。

关键词: 活化石, 桫椤, 碳固存能力

Abstract:

Aims A living fossil is the nearest extant equivalent of an extinct species. Our objective is to utilize the biomass and productivity of living-fossil ecosystems to estimate the evolutionary trend in carbon sequestration capacity of terrestrial ecosystems.

Methods We investigated biomass and productivity of a living-fossil tree fern (Alsophila spinulosa) ecosystem in Sichuan Province of China using standard tree sampling methods.

Important findings The biomass and productivity of this living-fossil ecosystem ((36.151 ± 8.159) Mg C·hm ^-2 and (2.535 ± 0.174) Mg C·hm ^-2·a^-1, respectively) were smaller than that in current gymnosperm- or angiosperm-dominated ecosystems. This provides insight into the evolutionary trend in paleo-ecosystem carbon sequestration capacity and, hence, into understanding global carbon balance.

Key words: living fossil, Alsophila spinulosa, carbon sequestration capacity

马元丹, 江洪, 余树全, 周国模, 王彬, 彭少麟, 彭长辉, 常杰, 魏晓华. 桫椤生态系统生物量与生产力. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6): 1294-1300. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.06.010

MA Yuan-Dan, JIANG Hong, YU Shu-Quan, ZHOU Guo-Mo, WANG Bin, PENG Shao-Lin, PENG Chang-Hui, CHANG Jie, WEI Xiao-Hua. BIOMASS AND PRODUCTIVITY OF A TREE FERN ECOSYSTEM IN CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(6): 1294-1300. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.06.010

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.06.010

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2008/V32/I6/1294

图/表 3

参考文献 52

[1]	Ackerly DD, Dudley SA, Sultan SE, Schmitt J, Coleman JS, Linder CR, Sandquist DR, Geber MA, Evans AS, Dawson TE, Lechowicz MJ (2000). The evolution of plant ecophysiological traits: recent advances and future directions. BioScience, 50,979-995.
[2]	Arens NC (1997). Responses of leaf anatomy to light environment in the tree fern Cyathea caracasana (Cyatheaceae) and its application to some ancient seed ferns. Palaios, 12,84-94.
[3]	Arens NC, Baracaldo PS (1998). Distribution of tree ferns (Cyatheaceae) across the successional mosaic in an Andean cloud forest, Narino, Colombia. American Fern Journal, 88,60-71.
[4]	Arens NC, Baracaldo PS (2000). Variation in tree fern stipe length with canopy height: tracking preferred habitat through morphological change. American Fern Journal, 90,1-15.
[5]	Arens NC, Smith AR (1998). Cyathea planadae, a remarkable new creeping tree fern from Colombia, South America. American Fern Journal, 88,49-59.
[6]	Arens NC (2001). Variation in performance of the tree fern Cyathea caracasana (Cyatheaceae) across a successional mosaic in an Andean cloud forest. American Journal of Botan, 88,545-551.
[7]	Baker RA, DiMichele WA (1997). Biomass allocation in late Pennsylvanian coal-swamp plants. PALAIOS, 12,127-132.
[8]	Bell PR (1992). Green Plants: Their Origin and Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[9]	Berner RA (1997). The rise of plants and their effect on weathering and atmospheric CO ₂. Science, 276,544-546.
[10]	Berner RA (1998). Sensitivity of Phanerozoic atmospheric CO ₂to paleogeographically induced changes in land temperature and surface runoff. In: Crowley TJ, Burke KC eds. Tectonic Boundary Conditions for Climatic Reconstructions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 251-261.
[11]	Beerling DJ, Woodward FI (1997). Changes in land plant function over the Phanerozoic: reconstructions based on the fossil record. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 124,137-153.
[12]	Beerling DJ, Osborne CP, Chaloner WG (2001). Evolution of leaf-form in land plants linked to atmospheric CO ₂ decline in the Late Palaeozoic Era. Nature, 410,352-354. DOI URL PMID
[13]	Bittner J, Breckle SW (1995). The growth rate and age of tree fern trunks in relation to habitats. American Fern Journal, 85,37-42.
[14]	Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE (1989). Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 35,881-902.
[15]	Chapin III FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[16]	Chen QC (陈启瑺) (1992). Study on Productivity of Cyclobalanopsis glauca (青冈林生产力研究). Hangzhou University Press, Hangzhou. (in Chinese)
[17]	Dai ZF (代正福), Zhou ZB (周正邦) (2000). Kinds and ecological type of wild Cyatheaceae ornamental plants in China. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences (贵州农业科学), 28,47-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Dixon RK, Brown RA, Houghton RA (1994). Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 263,185-190. DOI URL PMID
[19]	Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci LJ (2001). Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292,2320-2322. DOI URL PMID
[20]	Feng ZW (冯宗炜), Wang XK (王效科), Wu G (吴刚) (1999). Forest Ecosystem’s Biomass and Productivity in China (中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[21]	Gandolfo MA, Nixon KC, Crepet WL, Stevenson DW, Friis EM (1998). Oldest known fossils of monocotyledons. Nature, 394,532-533.
[22]	Gastony GJ (1979). Spore morphology in the Cyatheaceae. Ⅲ. The genus Trichipteris. American Journal of Botany, 66,1238-1260.
[23]	Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Smith AG, Bleeker W, Lourens LJ (2004). A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, and the official website of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (IGS) under www.stratigraphy.org.
[24]	Han XG (韩兴国), Li LH (李凌浩), Huang JH (黄建辉) (1999). An Introduction to Biogeochemistry(生物地球化学概论). Higher Education Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 86-97. (in Chinese)
[25]	Houghton RA, Lawrence KT, Hackler JL, Brown S (2001). The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: a comparison of estimates. Global Change Biology, 7,731-746.
[26]	Houghton RA (2005). Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Global Change Biology, 11,945-958.
[27]	IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: the Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[28]	Jiang H (江洪) (1986). A study on the biomass and production of Picea purpurea forest communities. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学学报), 10,146-152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	Jiang H, Apps MJ, Zhang YL, Peng CH, Woodard PM (1999). Modeling the spatial pattern of net primary productivity in Chinese forests. Ecological Modeling, 122,275-288.
[30]	Jiang H, Apps MJ, Peng CH, Zhang YL, Liu JX (2002). Modeling the influence of harvesting on Chinese boreal forest carbon dynamics. Forest Ecology and Management, 169,65-82.
[31]	Krassilov VA (2003). Terrestrial Paleoecology and Global Change. PENSOFT Publishers,Bulgaria, 286-292.
[32]	Lucansky TW (1974). Comparative studies of the nodal and vascular anatomy in the neotropical Cyatheaceae.Ⅱ. Squamate genera. American Journal of Botany, 61,472-480.
[33]	Lucansky TW (1985). Anatomical studies of Sphaeropteris and Cnemidaria (Cyatheaceae). American Fern Journal 75, 80-91.
[34]	McElwain JC, Beerling DJ, Woodward FI (1999). Fossil plants and global warming at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary. Science, 285,1386-1390. DOI URL PMID
[35]	Myneni RB, Dong J, Tucker CJ, Kaufmann RK, Kauppl PE, Liski J, Zhou L, Alexeyev V, Hughes MK (2001). A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98,14784-14789. DOI URL PMID
[36]	Nemani RR, Keeling CD, Hashimoto H, Jolly WM, Piper SC, Tucker CJ, Myneni RB, Running SW (2003). Climate driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982-1999. Science, 300,1560-1564. URL PMID
[37]	Raymond A (1987). Palaeogeographic distribution of Early Devonian plant traits. Palaios, 2,113-132.
[38]	Redondo-Brenes A, Montagnini F (2006). Growth, productivity, aboveground biomass, and carbon sequestration of pure and mixed native tree plantations in the Caribbean lowlands of Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 232,168-178.
[39]	Royer DL, Hickey LJ, Wing SL (2003). Ecological conservatism in the ‘living fossil’ Ginkgo. Paleobiology, 29,84-104.
[40]	Royer DL (2002). Estimating Latest Cretaceous and Tertiary Atmospheric CO ₂ Concentration from Stomatal Indices. PhD dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, USA, 40.
[41]	Shugart HH (1998). Terrestrial Ecosystems in Changing Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[42]	Sun BN, Dilcher DL, Beerling DJ, Zhang CJ, Yan DF, Kowalski E (2003). Variation in Ginkgo biloba L. leaf characters across a climatic gradient in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100,7141-7146. DOI URL PMID
[43]	Tryon RM (1970). The classification of the Cyatheaceae. Contr. Gray Herb, 200,3-53.
[44]	Tryon RM (1972). Endemic areas and geographic speciation in tropical American ferns. Biotropica, 4,121-131.
[45]	Tryon RM, Tryon AF (1982). Ferns and Allied Plants with Special Reference to Tropical America. Springer-Verlag, New York, 138-212.
[46]	Uri V, Lбhmus K, Ostonen I, Tullus H, Lastik R, Vildo M (2007). Biomass production, foliar and root characteristics and nutrient accumulation in young silver birch ( Betula pendula Roth.) stand growing on abandoned agricultural land. European Journal of Forest Research, online first, doi: 10.1007/s10342-007-0171-9.
[47]	Whittaker RH, Marks PL (1975). Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In: Lieth H, Whittaker RH eds. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer-Verlag, New York, 55-118.
[48]	Willis KJ, McElwain JC (2002). The Evolution of Plants. Oxford Universty Press, New York, 107-110.
[49]	Williams CJ, Johnson AH, LePage BA, Vann DR, Sweda T (2003). Reconstruction of Tertiary Metasequoia forests. II. Structure, biomass, and productivity of Eocene floodplain forests in the Canadian Arctic. Paleobiology, 29, 2,271-292.
[50]	Zhang XC (张宪春), Zhang LB (张丽兵) (2004). Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (Vol.6, No.3)(中国植物志·3卷6期). Science Press, Beijing, 313. (in Chinese)
[51]	Zheng YS (郑郁善), Hong W (洪伟) (1998). Management of Moso Bamboo. Xiamen University Press, China, 314-322. (in Chinese)
[52]	Zhou ZQ (周志琼), Su ZX (苏智先), Liao YM (廖永梅), Su RJ (苏瑞军), Li YX (黎云祥) (2004). Advance of biological study on Alsophila spinulosa. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (贵州师范大学学报), 22,100-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)

	生物量 Biomass (Mg C·hm^-2)	百分比 Percentage (%)	年均生物量增量MAI (Mg C·hm^-2 a^-1)	百分比 Percentage (%)
茎干Stem	23.874 (± 1.786)	79.31	0.296 (± 0.010)	13.67
当年生叶片Current year’s foliage	0.913 (± 0.065)	3.03
去年生叶片Last year’s foliage	1.826 (± 0.130)	6.07	1.826 (± 0.130)	84.39
老叶片Old foliage	0.088 (± 0.006)	0.29
根Root	3.400 (± 0.229)	11.29	0.042 (± 0.002)	1.95
总计Total	30.101 (± 2.216)	100	2.164 (± 0.118)	100

	生物量 Biomass (Mg C·hm^-2)	百分比 Percentage (%)	年均生物量增量MAI (Mg C·hm^-2 a^-1)	百分比 Percentage (%)
茎干Stem	23.874 (± 1.786)	79.31	0.296 (± 0.010)	13.67
当年生叶片Current year’s foliage	0.913 (± 0.065)	3.03
去年生叶片Last year’s foliage	1.826 (± 0.130)	6.07	1.826 (± 0.130)	84.39
老叶片Old foliage	0.088 (± 0.006)	0.29
根Root	3.400 (± 0.229)	11.29	0.042 (± 0.002)	1.95
总计Total	30.101 (± 2.216)	100	2.164 (± 0.118)	100

	生物量 Biomass (Mg C·hm^-2)	百分比 Percentage (%)	年均生物量增量MAI (Mg C·hm^-2 a^-1)	百分比 Percentage (%)
乔木Tree	35.257 (± 8.784)	97.53	2.164 (± 0.118)	85.37
灌木Shrub	0.252 (± 0.072)	0.70	0.050 (± 0.014)	1.99
草本Herb	0.641 (± 0.554)	1.77	0.321 (± 0.277)	12.56
群落Community	36.151 (± 8.159)	100	2.535 (± 0.174)	100

	生物量 Biomass (Mg C·hm^-2)	百分比 Percentage (%)	年均生物量增量MAI (Mg C·hm^-2 a^-1)	百分比 Percentage (%)
乔木Tree	35.257 (± 8.784)	97.53	2.164 (± 0.118)	85.37
灌木Shrub	0.252 (± 0.072)	0.70	0.050 (± 0.014)	1.99
草本Herb	0.641 (± 0.554)	1.77	0.321 (± 0.277)	12.56
群落Community	36.151 (± 8.159)	100	2.535 (± 0.174)	100

桫椤生态系统生物量与生产力

BIOMASS AND PRODUCTIVITY OF A TREE FERN ECOSYSTEM IN CHINA

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 52

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价