Abstract: Bryophytes on the ground under six types of artificial forests, Picea balfouriana forest (P), Pinus tabulaeformis forest (Y), Pinus armandii forest (H), Larix kaempferi forest (L), Picea balfouriana-Pinus tabulaeformis forest (P-Y) and Pinus tabulaeformis-Pinus armandii forest (Y-H), were investigated in the upper Minjiang River in order to understand the bryophyte composition and synusia structure of these different forest types. In the 19 bryophyte species identified, only 13, 10, 7, 11, 9 and 10 species were present in the P, L, H, Y-H, Y and P-H forests, respectively. Four mosses, Brachythecium glaciale, Thuidium cymbifolium, Entodon concinnus and Eurhynchium savatieri, were common in all six plantations. Another three mosses, Entodon macropodus, Mnium spinosum and Polytrichum formosum, occurred only in the Picea balfouriana forest. The highest frequency of bryophyte occurrence was under the P forest (90%) and the lowest frequency under the H forest (17.65%). Thuidium cymbifolium had the highest frequency (60%) of all species under the P forest, and the second was Brachythecium glaciale (50%). The predominant species, based on the importance value, was Thuidium cymbifolium under the P forest and Brachythecium glaciale, occurred under the other five plantations, which indicated that Brachythecium glaciale was the most common moss species in the study area. In all forests, the P forest had the highest bryophyte diversity (Shannon-Wiener index, species richness index) and the H forest had the lowest diversity. The lowest Simpson index was calculated for the H forest and the highest one for the P forest. The highest similarity index (Sorensen similarity) occurred between the H and Y forests (0.89) and the lowest similarity index between the P and H forests (0.40). The greatest percent coverage (17.79%±1.67%), shoot density ((3 807.11±412.90) shoots•m-2) and thickness ((19.89±1.69) mm) of bryophytes occurred under the P forest, and the lowest values (0.41%±1.49%, (27.99±367.95) shoots•m-2, and (1.80±1.51) mm, respectively) under the H forest. For the Y, L, Y-H and P-H forests, ground bryophyte cover was 5.20%±1.58%, 2.44%±1.58%. 2.73%±1.61%, and 2.71%±1.61%, respectively, shoot density was (623.08±391.71), (566.13±391.71), (253.38±398.41), and (188.69±398.41) shoots•m-2, respectively, and average bryophyte thickness was (9.60±1.61), (14.93±1.61), (9.59±1.63), and (6.69±1.63) mm, respectively. No statistical differences (p<0.05) were found in any of these measures among the Y, L, Y-H and P-H forests. The low bryophyte diversity and limited structure development (density, coverage, thickness) found under all six plantations indicate that, in general, these are poorly developed bryophyte communities. Our results show that the best bryophyte community have developed under the spruce forest with a relatively open canopy and low tree density. Our results suggest that tree thinning or canopy pruning would be an effective measure for improving bryophyte development under dense forests.