植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 344-351.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0046
接受日期:
2005-10-26
发布日期:
2006-03-30
作者简介:
E-mail: zhaoxl@tea.ac.cn
基金资助:
ZHAO Xiu_Lan1,2(), LI Wen_Xiong2
Accepted:
2005-10-26
Published:
2006-03-30
摘要:
利用不同品质类型春小麦(Triticum aestivum)品种在大田条件下研究了灌浆期籽粒降落数值动态变化规律以及氮磷肥与播期的影响效应。结果表明,开花15 d至成熟期间,籽粒降落数值呈先升后降的单峰曲线变化,并推知α_淀粉酶活性(液化值)呈先降后升的单谷曲线变化。在富钾情况下,氮素增施,高蛋白强筋品种降落数值增加,动态曲线峰值上升且出现时间推迟,而高蛋白中筋和低蛋白弱筋品种降落数值则降低,峰值下降且出现时间提前。磷素增施,各基因型品种降落数值均降低;动态曲线峰值、谷值及出现时间因基因型呈不同变化。氮磷(钾)素平衡配施是形成较高降落数值(较低α_淀粉酶活性)的关键。在无水分胁迫情况下,光温互作是影响各基因型籽粒降落数值动态形成的首要条件,其次为降水;且在光温因子互作中,光合有效辐射为最敏感因子。较高的光温条件互作是形成各品种较高降落数值的基础,在此基础上增加光合有效辐射则使高蛋白强筋品种降落数值增加;而以此为基础,在一定水平光照条件限度内,增加光合有效辐射则使高蛋白中筋和低蛋白弱筋品种降落数值增加,超过限度则使其降低。气象条件的影响作用及基因型差异可通过曲线动态变化反映出来。不同基因型降落数值在不同环境条件(氮磷肥水平和气象条件)下变异不同。
赵秀兰, 李文雄. 氮磷水平和播期对春小麦籽粒灌浆期降落数值动态变化的影响. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(2): 344-351. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0046
ZHAO Xiu_Lan, LI Wen_Xiong. EFFECT OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS LEVEL AND SOWING DATE ON DYNAMIC CHANGE IN GRAIN FALLING NUMBER IN SPRING WHEAT IN GRAIN FILLING. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(2): 344-351. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0046
图2 不同播期籽粒降落数值动态变化 ◆ 播期1 Sowing date 1; ■ 播期2 Sowing date 2; △ 播期3 Sowing date 3
Fig.2 Dynamic changes in grain falling number (GFN) of the same genotype in different sowing dates
处理 Treatment | 基因型 Genotype | 有关的曲线极值和拐点参数 Curve parameters | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ts | Tm | Ys | Ym | Tc | AL | AR | Vm | |||||
总平均Average_all | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 29.3 | 423 | |||||||||
‘东农7742’ ‘DN7742’ | 35.0 | 23.1 | 303 | 391 | 29.1 | - | + | -55.5 | ||||
‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 31.6 | 24.8 | 357 | 372 | 28.2 | - | + | -16.2 | ||||
F1 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 29.6 | 395 | |||||||||
F2 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 29.5 | 427 | 21.4 | + | - | 135.8 | |||||
F3 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 29.8 | 419 | 19.5 | + | - | 143.3 | |||||
F4 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 30.1 | 419 | 23.0 | + | - | 149.8 | |||||
F1 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 26.4 | 440 | |||||||||
F2 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 31.3 | 22.1 | 325 | 415 | 26.7 | - | + | -73.2 | |||
F3 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 31.2 | 21.7 | 285 | 394 | 26.4 | - | + | -85.7 | |||
F4 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 31.2 | 21.5 | 295 | 409 | 26.3 | - | + | -88.1 | |||
F1 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 28.2 | 385 | |||||||||
F2 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 31.5 | 24.2 | 380 | 402 | 27.9 | - | + | -22.9 | |||
F3 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 29.7 | 26.7 | 345 | 346 | 28.2 | - | + | -2.1 | |||
F4 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 31.8 | 25.2 | 342 | 356 | 28.5 | - | + | -16.0 | |||
播期1 Sowing date 1 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 30.0 | 417 | 18.5 | + | - | 164.1 | |||||
播期2 Sowing date 2 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 28.1 | 430 | |||||||||
播期3 Sowing date 3 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 22.8 | 510 | 27.3 | - | + | -87.8 | |||||
播期1 Sowing date 1 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 20.4 | 399 | |||||||||
播期2 Sowing date 2 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 24.9 | 386 | |||||||||
播期3 Sowing date 3 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 29.6 | 387 | |||||||||
播期1 Sowing date 1 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 30.8 | 22.9 | 329 | 356 | 26.9 | - | + | -26.3 | |||
播期2 Sowing date 2 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 28.6 | 21.7 | 357 | 380 | 25.1 | - | + | -24.9 | |||
播期3 Sowing date 3 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 25.3 | 419 |
表1 籽粒降落数值积累曲线方程的极值和拐点
Table 1 Parameters of accumulation equation of grain falling number (GFN)
处理 Treatment | 基因型 Genotype | 有关的曲线极值和拐点参数 Curve parameters | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ts | Tm | Ys | Ym | Tc | AL | AR | Vm | |||||
总平均Average_all | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 29.3 | 423 | |||||||||
‘东农7742’ ‘DN7742’ | 35.0 | 23.1 | 303 | 391 | 29.1 | - | + | -55.5 | ||||
‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 31.6 | 24.8 | 357 | 372 | 28.2 | - | + | -16.2 | ||||
F1 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 29.6 | 395 | |||||||||
F2 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 29.5 | 427 | 21.4 | + | - | 135.8 | |||||
F3 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 29.8 | 419 | 19.5 | + | - | 143.3 | |||||
F4 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 30.1 | 419 | 23.0 | + | - | 149.8 | |||||
F1 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 26.4 | 440 | |||||||||
F2 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 31.3 | 22.1 | 325 | 415 | 26.7 | - | + | -73.2 | |||
F3 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 31.2 | 21.7 | 285 | 394 | 26.4 | - | + | -85.7 | |||
F4 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 31.2 | 21.5 | 295 | 409 | 26.3 | - | + | -88.1 | |||
F1 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 28.2 | 385 | |||||||||
F2 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 31.5 | 24.2 | 380 | 402 | 27.9 | - | + | -22.9 | |||
F3 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 29.7 | 26.7 | 345 | 346 | 28.2 | - | + | -2.1 | |||
F4 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 31.8 | 25.2 | 342 | 356 | 28.5 | - | + | -16.0 | |||
播期1 Sowing date 1 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 30.0 | 417 | 18.5 | + | - | 164.1 | |||||
播期2 Sowing date 2 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 28.1 | 430 | |||||||||
播期3 Sowing date 3 | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | 22.8 | 510 | 27.3 | - | + | -87.8 | |||||
播期1 Sowing date 1 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 20.4 | 399 | |||||||||
播期2 Sowing date 2 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 24.9 | 386 | |||||||||
播期3 Sowing date 3 | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | 29.6 | 387 | |||||||||
播期1 Sowing date 1 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 30.8 | 22.9 | 329 | 356 | 26.9 | - | + | -26.3 | |||
播期2 Sowing date 2 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 28.6 | 21.7 | 357 | 380 | 25.1 | - | + | -24.9 | |||
播期3 Sowing date 3 | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | 25.3 | 419 |
累计要素 Accumulated elements | 基因型 Genotypes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
综合All | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | |
光合有效辐射(MJ·m-2·d-1)PAR | 0.985 6* | 0.979 7* | 0.991 8* | 0.993 3* |
气温日较差 Diurnal temperature range (℃) | 0.994 3* | 0.993 4* | 0.991 4* | 0.992 4* |
≥10℃积温 ≥10℃ Accumulated temperature (℃) | 0.959 8* | 0.971 5* | 0.975 4* | 0.980 4* |
降水 Precipitation (mm) | 0.628 9 | 0.683 8 | 0.883 7* | 0.911 1* |
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 81.92 | 83.95 | 82.47 | 94.06 |
表2 各基因型品种自开花至成熟期间各气象要素开花后逐候累计值主成份分析
Table 2 Principal components analysis of cumulative meteorological elements started from anthesis in a 5_day interval in genotypes during grain_filling
累计要素 Accumulated elements | 基因型 Genotypes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
综合All | ‘野猫’‘Wildcat’ | ‘东农7742’‘DN7742’ | ‘新克旱9’‘NKH9’ | |
光合有效辐射(MJ·m-2·d-1)PAR | 0.985 6* | 0.979 7* | 0.991 8* | 0.993 3* |
气温日较差 Diurnal temperature range (℃) | 0.994 3* | 0.993 4* | 0.991 4* | 0.992 4* |
≥10℃积温 ≥10℃ Accumulated temperature (℃) | 0.959 8* | 0.971 5* | 0.975 4* | 0.980 4* |
降水 Precipitation (mm) | 0.628 9 | 0.683 8 | 0.883 7* | 0.911 1* |
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 81.92 | 83.95 | 82.47 | 94.06 |
[1] | Alaru M, Laur U, Jama E (2003). Influence of nitrogen and weather conditions on the grain quality of winter triticale. Agronomy Research, 1,3-10. |
[2] | Fan XM (范雪梅), Jiang D (姜东), Dai TB (戴廷波), Jing Q (荆奇), Cao WX (曹卫星) (2004). Effect of post_anthesis drought and waterlogging on the quality of grain formation in different wheat varieties. Plant Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28,680-685. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Gale MD (1983). α-amylase activity in wheat. In: Kruger JE, LaBerge DE eds. . Third International Symposium on Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Cereals. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA,29-35. |
[4] | Grausgruber H, Oberforster M, Werteker M (2000). Stability of quality traits in Austrian_grown winter wheats. Field Crops Research, 66,257-267. |
[5] | Kettlewell PS, Cashman MM (1997). Alpha_amylase activity of wheat grain from crops differing in grain drying rate. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 128,127-134. |
[6] | Lan XJ (兰秀锦), Zheng YL (郑有良), Liu DC (刘登才), Yan ZH (颜泽洪), Wei YM (魏育明), Zhang ZQ (张志清) (2004). Evaluation on study methods of sprouting tolerance in Wheat. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University (四川农业大学学报), 22,121-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Lunn GD, Major BJ, Kettlewell PS (2001). Mechanisms leading to excess alpha_amylase activity in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) grain in the U.K. Journal of Cereal Science, 33,313-329. |
[8] | Qin DH (秦代红) (1989). The characteristics for preharvest sprouting resistance of wheat. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University (四川农业大学学报), 7,188-190. (in Chinese) |
[9] | Qin DH (秦代红) (1990). The physiology for preharvest sprouting resistance of wheat. Plant Physiology Communication (植物生理学通讯), 6,62-64. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Strand E (1983). Pre_harvest sprouting in wheat. In: Kruger JE, LaBerge DE eds Third International Symposium on Pre_Harvest Sprouting in Cereals. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA,260-266. |
[11] | Sun GZ (孙果忠), Run CS (闰长生), Xiao SH (肖世和) (2003). The mechanism on wheat pre_harvest sprouting. Review of China Agricultural Science and Technology (中国农业科技导报), 5,13-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Wang F (王芳), Wang XZ (王宪泽) (2004). Study on the dynamic changes of starch synthesis and their related enzymes in wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 24,57-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Wang RL (王若兰) (2000). The study of alpha_amylase activation of sprouting wheat. Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Technology (郑州工程学院学报), 21,18-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Wang YZ (王永章), Zhang DP (张大鹏) (2002). β_amylase in developing apple fruits: activities, amounts and subcellular localization. Science in China (Series C) (中国科学C辑), 32,200-210. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Xiao SH, Zhang XY, Chang YS (2002). Germplasm improvement for pre_harvest sprouting resistance in Chinese white_grained wheat: an overview of the current strategy. Euphytica, 126,35-38. |
[16] | Xu ZF (徐兆飞), Zhang HY (张惠叶), Zhang DY (张定一) (2000). Wheat Quality and Its Improvement (小麦品质及其改良). Chinese Meteorological Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[17] | Zeeman SC, Northorp F, Smith AM (1998). A starch accumulating mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana deficient in a choroplastic starch_hydrolyzing enzyme . Plant Journal, 15,357-365. |
[18] | Zhao SJ (赵世杰), Liu HS (刘华山), Dong XC (董新纯) (1998). The Guide of Plant Physiological Experiment (植物生理学实验指导). China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 代景忠, 白玉婷, 卫智军, 张楚, 辛晓平, 闫玉春, 闫瑞瑞. 羊草功能性状对施肥的动态响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 943-953. |
[2] | 张琦, 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 王娟. 雌雄异株树种东北鼠李营养资源需求性别二态性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1708-1717. |
[3] | 张璐, 郝匕台, 齐丽雪, 李艳龙, 徐慧敏, 杨丽娜, 宝音陶格涛. 草原群落生物量和土壤有机质含量对改良措施的动态响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 317-326. |
[4] | 师生波, 张怀刚, 师瑞, 李妙, 陈文杰, 孙亚男. 青藏高原春小麦叶片光合作用的光抑制及PSII反应中心光化学效率的恢复分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(4): 375-386. |
[5] | 徐驰, 刘茂松, 张明娟, 鲁小珍, 王磊, 刘志斌. 南京灵谷寺森林50年来的动态变化研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(5): 601-608. |
[6] | 王兮之, 葛剑平. 40多年来塔南策勒绿洲动态变化研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(3): 369-375. |
[7] | 张晓艳, 杨惠敏, 侯宗东, 王根轩. 土壤水分和种植密度对春小麦叶片气孔的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(1): 133-136. |
[8] | 潘晓云, 王永芳, 王根轩, 曹琴东, 王静. 覆膜栽培下春小麦种群的生长冗余与个体大小不整齐性的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(2): 177-184. |
[9] | 杨惠敏, 王根轩. 干旱和CO2浓度升高对干旱区春小麦气孔密度及分布的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(3): 312-316. |
[10] | 张其德, 温晓刚, 卢从明, 冯丽洁, 匡廷云, 张建华. 盐胁迫下CO2加倍对春小麦一些光合功能的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(3): 308-311. |
[11] | 魏虹, 林魁, 李凤民, 张荣, 原保忠. 有限灌溉对半干旱区春小麦根系发育的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(1): 106-110. |
[12] | 张荣, 张大勇, 原保忠, 林魁, 魏虹. 半干旱区春小麦品种竞争能力与产量关系的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(3): 205-210. |
[13] | 王同朝, 李凤民, 王俊, 赵松岭, 卫丽. 分层供水施磷对春小麦光合性能、同化产物流向和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(2): 177-185. |
[14] | 刘晓云, 刘速. 短生植物重量的动态变化及其分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(2): 177-183. |
[15] | 郑海雷, 黄子琛. 绿洲生态条件下春小麦蒸发蒸腾特征及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 1994, 18(4): 362-371. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19