科尔沁沙地差巴嘎蒿种群生态位适宜度分析

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0078

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以生长在科尔沁沙地的差巴嘎蒿(Artemisia halodendron)为研究对象,对其在不同类型沙地上的综合活力指数和生态位适宜度进行计算,主要结论如下:1)在生长旺季,差巴嘎蒿种群综合活力指数随着沙地的固定显著下降。2)在同一生长季内,综合生态位适宜度表现为半固定沙地>固定沙地和流动沙地;水分生态位适宜度表现为流动沙地>半固定沙地>固定沙地。随着土壤含水量的变化,土壤水分的限制土层深度也有所不同:7月各类型沙地均为15~30 cm土层;8月随着雨水的下渗,限制土层也有所加深,为45~60 cm土层;9月除流动沙地为15~30 cm外,半固定沙地和固定沙地均为30~45 cm。3)在同一生长季内的不同生境上种群的限制因子(NF_min)不同:在流动沙地上为土壤有机质,而在半固定沙地和固定沙地上为土壤含水量,且土壤有机质和土壤水分的配置关系直接影响综合生态位适宜度值的高低。在一定范围内,二者的比值可直接反映有机质对植物细根的有效性,同时种群通过调节细根生长状况来适应限制因子间的配置关系。

关键词: 科尔沁沙地, 差巴嘎蒿种群, 生态位适宜度

Abstract:

Background and Aims Niche fitness of Artemisia halondendron population, that fixes shifting and semi-fixed sandy soils in Horqin sandy land, rarely has been explored. This study addresses 1) spatial and temporal differences in niche fitness and composite vigor and 2) limiting factors of niche fitness in different habitats.
Methods Mathematical models were adapted to calculate composite vigor index (CVI) and niche fitness values of a population of A. halondendron inhabiting shifting, semi-fixed, and fixed sandy lands. Data on CVI and niche fitness were collected by measuring height, size of canopy, branches, and biomass of individuals, as well as soil moisture content, nutrient content, and bulk density.
Key Results CVI was remarkably low on fixed sandy land, indicating that the ecological function of the population was weakened. Composite niche fitness values for different soils during the growing season ranked: semi-fixed > fixed > shifting sandy land. Moisture fitness values ranked: shifting > semi-fixed > fixed sandy land. As the soil moisture content changed, the limiting layer also changed. It was 15-30 cm in the different sandy lands in July, but with the infiltration of rain water, the layer deepened to 45-60 cm in August. In September, it was 30-45 cm in semi-fixed and fixed sandy lands, but remained 15-30 cm in shifting sandy land. The limiting factors in different habitats were different: soil organic matter content was limiting on shifting sandy land and soil moisture content was limiting on semi-fixed and fixed sandy lands.
Conclusions This study indicated that soil moisture content and nutrient content affected composite niche fitness. The relationship of soil moisture content and nutrient content directly influences composite niche fitness. Their ratio could reflect the importance of organic matter to fine roots, and the population could adapt to the ratio by adjusting the growth of fine roots.

Key words: Horqin sandy land, Artemisia halondendron population, Niche fitness

朴顺姬, 王振杰, 颜秀灵, 张斌才, 尹航. 科尔沁沙地差巴嘎蒿种群生态位适宜度分析. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 593-600. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0078

PIAO Shun-Ji, WANG Zhen-Jie, YAN Xiu-Ling, ZHANG Bin-Cai, YIN Hang. ANALYSIS OF NICHE FITNESS OF ARTEMISIA HALONDENDRON POPULATION ON HORQIN SANDY LAND. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(4): 593-600. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0078

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0078

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2006/V30/I4/593

图/表 5

参考文献 19

[1]	Chao LM ( 潮洛蒙), Piao SJ ( 朴顺姬), Zhi RN ( 智瑞年), Song MH ( 宋明华) (1999). The distribution patterns of Artemisia halodendron in different sandland types. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 19(Suppl.1), 45-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Institute of Soil Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ( 中国科学院南京土壤研究所) (1978). Physical and Chemical Analysis Methods of Soils (土壤理化分析方法). Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai, 7-59. (in Chinese)
[3]	Li Q ( 李 ), Zhu JZ ( 朱金兆), Zhu QK ( 朱清科) (2003). A review on niche theory and niche metrics. Journal of Beijing Forestry Univercity (北京林业大学学报), 25, 100-107. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Li ZZ ( 李自珍), Huang ZC ( 黄子琛) (1995). Fitness analysis of water niches of artificial forest plants in Shapotou area. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 15, 97-101. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	Li ZZ ( 李自珍), Huang ZC ( 黄子琛), Tang HP ( 唐海萍) (1996). Numerical simulation of niche fitness process of plants in sandy area. Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Science) (兰州大学学报(自然科学版)), 32, 108-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Li ZZ ( 李自珍), Hui C ( 惠苍), Xu ZM ( 徐中民), Liu FM ( 刘发明) (2002). Mathematical model of niche construction for desert vegetation and its applications. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology (冰川冻土), 24, 387-392. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Li ZZ ( 李自珍), Li WL ( 李文龙) (2003). The effect of water-fertilizer conditions on crops niche-fitness and yield in semi-arid regions of the Loess Plateau. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 23, 28-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	Li ZZ ( 李自珍), Shi WL ( 施维林), Tang HP ( 唐海萍), Wang XP ( 王新平) (2001). Studies on numerical simulation of moisture niche fitness procedure of arid plants. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 21, 281-285. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Li ZZ ( 李自珍), Zhao SL ( 赵松岭), Zhang PY ( 张鹏云) (1993). Niche fitness theory and its application in crop growth system. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Science) (兰州大学学报(自然科学版)), 29, 219-224. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Lin H ( 林红), Li ZZ ( 李自珍) (1998). The niche-fitness model of crop in semi-arid regions and the quantitive analysis of the results of water-fertilizer regulation experiment. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Science) (兰州大学学报(自然科学版)), 34, 100-105. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Liu HM ( 刘华民), Piao SJ ( 朴顺姬), Wang LX ( 王立新), Liu F ( 刘芳), Wei Y ( 尉云), Liu SG ( 刘士刚) (2005). Population characteristics of Artemisia intramongolica at different successional stages. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 24, 497-502. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Liu SG ( 刘士刚), Piao SJ ( 朴顺姬), An MZ ( 安卯柱), Liu F ( 刘芳) (2003). Distribution dynamics of Artemisia halodendron absorbent roots in different kinds of sandy land. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27, 684-689. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	Tang HP ( 唐海萍), Shi PJ ( 史培军) (2001). Varition in growth characteristics among different planting patterns of Artemisia ordosica and Caragana korshinskii under carrying water availability regimes. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25, 6-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Zhang JY ( 张继义), Zhao HL ( 赵哈林) (2004). Spatial pattern of main species of the grassland community in the recovering succession in Horqin sandy land. Chinese Jonrnal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 23(2), 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	Zhang JY ( 张继义), Zhao HL ( 赵哈林), Zhang TH ( 张铜会), Zhao XY ( 赵学勇) (2003). Niche dynamics of main population of plants communities in the restoring succession process in Horqin sandy land. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23, 2741-2746. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Zhang TH ( 张铜会), Zhao HL ( 赵哈林), Chang XL ( 常学礼), Yaushio S ( 大黑俊哉), Toshiya O ( 白户康人), Ichiro T ( 谷山一郎) (2000). Various measures for moving-sand dune control and changes of vegetation in Horqin sandy land. Journal of Desert Research(中国沙漠), 20(Suppl.1), 48-52. (in Chinese with abstract)
[17]	Zhao AF ( 赵爱芬) (1998). Root system biomass distribution and sampling techniques comparison in sandy grass land vegetation. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 18(Suppl.2), 41-45.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Zhao WZ ( 赵文智), Zhao CY ( 赵存玉) (1994). Soil habitat characteristics of Artemsia plants in desertified land of Bashang, Hebei Province. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 14(4), 25-28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Zhou RL ( 周瑞莲), Zhao HL ( 赵哈林), Wang HO ( 王海鸥) (2001). Physiological mechanism of succession of the plants in Horqin sandland, China. Arid Zone Research (干旱区研究), 18, 13-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)

	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	p值 p value
密度 Dencity (m^-2)	1.11±0.20^AB	0.74±0.12^A	0.18±0.05^B	0.005
株高 Height (cm)	46.07±3.05^a	40.62±2.64^a	32.92±1.03^b	0.012
冠幅 Size of canopy (cm×cm)	(60.78±13.93)×(46.54±11.64)	(53.53±7.62)×(39.53±6.12)	(45.74±11.25)×(31.40±8.18)	0.560
单株枝条数 Branches of single body	97.80±8.01^A	87.50±22.08^A	26.50±2.46^B	0.004
单株地上生物量 Biomass of single body (g)	115.23±10.86^A	44.87±5.89^B	12.35±1.44^C	0.000
综合活力指数 Value of CVI	0.62±0.04^A	0.39±0.04^B	0.22±0.01^C	0.000
综合活力指数^* Value of CVI^*	0.57±0.05^A	0.35±0.09^B	0.22±0.04^C	0.000

	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	p值 p value
密度 Dencity (m^-2)	1.11±0.20^AB	0.74±0.12^A	0.18±0.05^B	0.005
株高 Height (cm)	46.07±3.05^a	40.62±2.64^a	32.92±1.03^b	0.012
冠幅 Size of canopy (cm×cm)	(60.78±13.93)×(46.54±11.64)	(53.53±7.62)×(39.53±6.12)	(45.74±11.25)×(31.40±8.18)	0.560
单株枝条数 Branches of single body	97.80±8.01^A	87.50±22.08^A	26.50±2.46^B	0.004
单株地上生物量 Biomass of single body (g)	115.23±10.86^A	44.87±5.89^B	12.35±1.44^C	0.000
综合活力指数 Value of CVI	0.62±0.04^A	0.39±0.04^B	0.22±0.01^C	0.000
综合活力指数^* Value of CVI^*	0.57±0.05^A	0.35±0.09^B	0.22±0.04^C	0.000

月份 Month	样地类型 Sample land type	NF	x₁/x_a₁	x₂/x_a₂	x₃/x_a₃	x₄/x_a₄	x₅/x_a₅
7月 July	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.831 5±0.013 9	0.954 7	0.548 8	1.284 1	0.548 1^*	1.103 1
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.875 6±0.014 5	0.715 9^*	1.429	1.606 8	0.822 7	0.961 7
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.845 4±0.007 7	0.402 1^*	4.971 9	1.353 9	1.695 8	0.613 5
	p值 p value	0.066
8月 Aug.	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.875 8±0.022 3	1.061 2	1.123 6	1.039 1	0.565 5^*	1.060 9
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.899 7±0.012 4	0.695 1^*	2.514 8	1.637 1	1.083 8	0.777 5
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.874 9±0.009 1	0.541 1^*	3.696 1	1.511 3	1.466 7	0.677 8
	p值 p value	0.465
9月 Sept.	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.865 1±0.003 3^A	0.637 2	1.887 2	1.355 1	0.574 8^*	1.113 4
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.840 9±0.006 1^B	0.486 4^*	2.030 3	1.739 5	0.564 5	1.057 2
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.853 5±0.012 8^AB	0.207 7^*	4.449 3	1.717 4	1.374 3	0.745 4
	p值 p value	0.006

月份 Month	样地类型 Sample land type	NF	x₁/x_a₁	x₂/x_a₂	x₃/x_a₃	x₄/x_a₄	x₅/x_a₅
7月 July	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.831 5±0.013 9	0.954 7	0.548 8	1.284 1	0.548 1^*	1.103 1
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.875 6±0.014 5	0.715 9^*	1.429	1.606 8	0.822 7	0.961 7
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.845 4±0.007 7	0.402 1^*	4.971 9	1.353 9	1.695 8	0.613 5
	p值 p value	0.066
8月 Aug.	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.875 8±0.022 3	1.061 2	1.123 6	1.039 1	0.565 5^*	1.060 9
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.899 7±0.012 4	0.695 1^*	2.514 8	1.637 1	1.083 8	0.777 5
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.874 9±0.009 1	0.541 1^*	3.696 1	1.511 3	1.466 7	0.677 8
	p值 p value	0.465
9月 Sept.	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.865 1±0.003 3^A	0.637 2	1.887 2	1.355 1	0.574 8^*	1.113 4
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.840 9±0.006 1^B	0.486 4^*	2.030 3	1.739 5	0.564 5	1.057 2
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.853 5±0.012 8^AB	0.207 7^*	4.449 3	1.717 4	1.374 3	0.745 4
	p值 p value	0.006

月份 Month	样地类型 Sample land type	NF	0~15 cm	15~30 cm	30~45 cm	45~60 cm	60~75 cm	75~90 cm
7月 July	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.821 0±0.035 0^a	1.272 6	0.729 5^*	0.775 4	0.781 2	0.813 6	0.785 3
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.686 1±0.061 7^ab	1.215 7	0.598 2^*	0.633 2	0.598 6	0.616 9	0.649 8
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.581 7±0.079 5^b	0.912 2	0.367 9^*	0.380 0	0.629 0	0.602 7	0.604 8
	p值 p value	0.046
8月 Aug.	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.798 6±0.082 1	1.769 6	1.210 9	0.662 4	0.589 5^*	0.631 8	0.936 1
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.760 5±0.231 5	1.342 9	1.226 0	0.715 1	0.496 7^*	0.561 0	0.642 5
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.742 4±0.084 0	1.762 1	1.030 5	0.344 4	0.338 9^*	0.375 7	0.471 8
	p值 p value	0.964
9月 Sept.	流动沙地 Shifting sandy land	0.577 8±0.030 3^A	0.582 2	0.427 1^*	0.558 7	0.609 8	0.641 4	0.575 3
	半固定沙地 Semi-fixed sandy land	0.471 4±0.032 1^B	0.497 9	0.381 3	0.327 4^*	0.394 8	0.501 4	0.544 7
	固定沙地 Fixed sandy land	0.266 7±0.016 4^C	0.329 7	0.253 1	0.227 6^*	0.238 2	0.249 7	0.286 1
	p值 p value	0.000