Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 242-250.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0031
Previous Articles Next Articles
DUAN Ren-Yan1,2, WANG Xiao-An1,*()
Received:
2003-12-16
Accepted:
2004-07-01
Online:
2005-12-16
Published:
2005-03-10
Contact:
WANG Xiao-An
DUAN Ren-Yan, WANG Xiao-An. INTRASPECIFIC AND INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION IN LARIX CHINENSIS[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2005, 29(2): 242-250.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2005.0031
径级Diameter scale (cm) | 5~15 | 15~25 | 25~35 | 35~45 | 45~55 | 55~65 | 合计Sum | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株数Number | 110 | 182 | 72 | 23 | 9 | 4 | 400 | ||||
百分比 Percentage (%) | 27.5 | 45.5 | 18.0 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 100.0 |
Table 1 DBH distribution of objective tree
径级Diameter scale (cm) | 5~15 | 15~25 | 25~35 | 35~45 | 45~55 | 55~65 | 合计Sum | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株数Number | 110 | 182 | 72 | 23 | 9 | 4 | 400 | ||||
百分比 Percentage (%) | 27.5 | 45.5 | 18.0 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 100.0 |
种类 Species | 太白红杉 Larix chinensis | 巴山冷杉 Abies fargesii | 牛皮桦 Betula platyphylla | 其它树种 Other species | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
胸径DBH (cm) | 5.03~56.78 | 6.45~40.45 | 5.62~27.38 | 5.27~35.24 | ||||
平均胸径 Average of DBH (cm) | 17.25 | 27.27 | 9.44 | 8.29 | ||||
株数Number | 3442 | 496 | 82 | 30 | ||||
百分比 Percentage (%) | 84.98 | 12.25 | 2.02 | 0.75 |
Table 2 Species of competitive trees
种类 Species | 太白红杉 Larix chinensis | 巴山冷杉 Abies fargesii | 牛皮桦 Betula platyphylla | 其它树种 Other species | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
胸径DBH (cm) | 5.03~56.78 | 6.45~40.45 | 5.62~27.38 | 5.27~35.24 | ||||
平均胸径 Average of DBH (cm) | 17.25 | 27.27 | 9.44 | 8.29 | ||||
株数Number | 3442 | 496 | 82 | 30 | ||||
百分比 Percentage (%) | 84.98 | 12.25 | 2.02 | 0.75 |
径级Diameter scale (cm) | 5~15 | 15~25 | 25~35 | 35~45 | 45~55 | 55~65 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
竞争强度 Competition intensity | 6.43 | 2.74 | 1.83 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 0.63 | |||||||
标准差Standard deviation | 5.51 | 2.44 | 1.01 | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.16 | |||||||
样本数Sample number | 1 161 | 1 410 | 630 | 175 | 47 | 12 |
Table 3 Intraspecific competition intensity of Larix chinensis
径级Diameter scale (cm) | 5~15 | 15~25 | 25~35 | 35~45 | 45~55 | 55~65 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
竞争强度 Competition intensity | 6.43 | 2.74 | 1.83 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 0.63 | |||||||
标准差Standard deviation | 5.51 | 2.44 | 1.01 | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.16 | |||||||
样本数Sample number | 1 161 | 1 410 | 630 | 175 | 47 | 12 |
种类 Species | 太白红杉 Larix chinensis | 巴山冷杉 Abies fargesii | 牛皮桦 Betula platyphylla | 其它树种 Other species |
---|---|---|---|---|
竞争强度 Competition intensity | 3.52 | 2.88 | 1.72 | 0.84 |
标准差 Standard deviation | 0.22 | 1.48 | 0.86 | 0.11 |
样本数 Sample number | 3 396 | 545 | 91 | 23 |
Table 4 Interspecific competition intensity of Larix chinensis
种类 Species | 太白红杉 Larix chinensis | 巴山冷杉 Abies fargesii | 牛皮桦 Betula platyphylla | 其它树种 Other species |
---|---|---|---|---|
竞争强度 Competition intensity | 3.52 | 2.88 | 1.72 | 0.84 |
标准差 Standard deviation | 0.22 | 1.48 | 0.86 | 0.11 |
样本数 Sample number | 3 396 | 545 | 91 | 23 |
A | B | R0.05 | R0.01 | 显著性Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
太白红杉与整个林分 Larix chinensis and forest | 89.75 | 1.24 | 0.89 | 0.32 | ** |
太白红杉与伴生树种 Larix chinensis and other species | 91.96 | 1.57 | 0.66 | 0.26 | * |
太白红杉种内 Intraspecific in Larix chinensis | 189.25 | 1.51 | 0.96 | 0.30 | ** |
太白红杉与巴山冷杉 Larix chinensis and Abies fargesii | 53.36 | 1.46 | 0.62 | 0.25 | * |
太白红杉与牛皮桦 Larix chinensis and Betula platyphylla | 64.24 | 1.70 | 0.85 | 0.30 | ** |
Table 5 Model parameters of competition intensity and DBH of objective tree
A | B | R0.05 | R0.01 | 显著性Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
太白红杉与整个林分 Larix chinensis and forest | 89.75 | 1.24 | 0.89 | 0.32 | ** |
太白红杉与伴生树种 Larix chinensis and other species | 91.96 | 1.57 | 0.66 | 0.26 | * |
太白红杉种内 Intraspecific in Larix chinensis | 189.25 | 1.51 | 0.96 | 0.30 | ** |
太白红杉与巴山冷杉 Larix chinensis and Abies fargesii | 53.36 | 1.46 | 0.62 | 0.25 | * |
太白红杉与牛皮桦 Larix chinensis and Betula platyphylla | 64.24 | 1.70 | 0.85 | 0.30 | ** |
径级Diameter scale (cm) | 5~15 | 15~25 | 25~35 | 35~45 | 45~55 | 55~65 | 65~75 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
太白红杉与整个林分Larix chinensis and forest | 8.57 | 4.01 | 1.69 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.59 |
太白红杉与伴生树种Larix chinensis and other species | 3.86 | 1.88 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.27 |
太白红杉种内Intraspecific in Larix chinensis | 6.48 | 2.70 | 1.31 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.43 |
太白红杉与巴山冷杉Larix chinensis and Abies fargesii | 3.79 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
太白红杉与牛皮桦Larix chinensis and Betula platyphylla | 1.34 | 0.73 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.23 |
Table 6 Model prediction of interspecific and intraspecific competition intensity and DBH
径级Diameter scale (cm) | 5~15 | 15~25 | 25~35 | 35~45 | 45~55 | 55~65 | 65~75 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
太白红杉与整个林分Larix chinensis and forest | 8.57 | 4.01 | 1.69 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.59 |
太白红杉与伴生树种Larix chinensis and other species | 3.86 | 1.88 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.27 |
太白红杉种内Intraspecific in Larix chinensis | 6.48 | 2.70 | 1.31 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.43 |
太白红杉与巴山冷杉Larix chinensis and Abies fargesii | 3.79 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
太白红杉与牛皮桦Larix chinensis and Betula platyphylla | 1.34 | 0.73 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.23 |
分枝角度 Branching angle | 总分枝数Total branch number | 活枝数 Living branch number | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle- stratum | 上层 Super- stratum | 下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle- stratum | 上层 Super- stratum | 下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle- stratum | 上层 Super- stratum | ||||||||
NNI | 99.4±7.3a | 69.2±5.5a | 66.3±4.2a | 46.0±5.6a | 47.5±7.3a | 46.6±7.6a | 17.8±1.4a | 20.9±2.4a | 24.3±2.9a | |||||||
LNI | 96.4±8.8a | 80.4±9.5a | 56.3±8.4a | 45.8±7.9a | 40.4±6.5a | 42.3±2.6a | 12.9±3.4a | 17.6±3.7a | 26.4±9.8a | |||||||
HNI | 106.4±9.7a | 88.4±8.9a | 59.3±6.8a | 47.1±2.7a | 38.4±5.9a | 45.3±4.8a | 5.9±1.4b | 7.6±2.1b | 20.8±3.7a | |||||||
p | 0.289 | 0.159 | 0.352 | 0.301 | 0.998 | 0.874 | 0.000 1 | 0.009 5 | 0.521 | |||||||
当年生枝条长 Current-year branch length (cm) | 平均枝长 Average branch length (cm) | |||||||||||||||
下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle-stratum | 上层 Super-stratum | 下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle-stratum | 上层 Super-stratum | |||||||||||
NNI | 5.6±0.4a | 6.3±0.9a | 6.4±0.8a | 103.6±9.7a | 66.7±5.1a | 56.1±3.7a | ||||||||||
LNI | 3.6±0.5b | 4.4±0.8b | 6.2±0.9a | 92.1±13.4a | 54.1±3.7b | 47.5±6.9a | ||||||||||
HNI | 1.6±0.8c | 2.4±0.7c | 5.8±0.9a | 42.1±5.4b | 44.1±3.7c | 30.8±4.3b | ||||||||||
p | 0.032 | 0.049 | 0.388 | 0.000 4 | 0.000 3 | 0.000 6 |
Table 7 The character of Larix chinensis with different neighborhood competition
分枝角度 Branching angle | 总分枝数Total branch number | 活枝数 Living branch number | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle- stratum | 上层 Super- stratum | 下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle- stratum | 上层 Super- stratum | 下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle- stratum | 上层 Super- stratum | ||||||||
NNI | 99.4±7.3a | 69.2±5.5a | 66.3±4.2a | 46.0±5.6a | 47.5±7.3a | 46.6±7.6a | 17.8±1.4a | 20.9±2.4a | 24.3±2.9a | |||||||
LNI | 96.4±8.8a | 80.4±9.5a | 56.3±8.4a | 45.8±7.9a | 40.4±6.5a | 42.3±2.6a | 12.9±3.4a | 17.6±3.7a | 26.4±9.8a | |||||||
HNI | 106.4±9.7a | 88.4±8.9a | 59.3±6.8a | 47.1±2.7a | 38.4±5.9a | 45.3±4.8a | 5.9±1.4b | 7.6±2.1b | 20.8±3.7a | |||||||
p | 0.289 | 0.159 | 0.352 | 0.301 | 0.998 | 0.874 | 0.000 1 | 0.009 5 | 0.521 | |||||||
当年生枝条长 Current-year branch length (cm) | 平均枝长 Average branch length (cm) | |||||||||||||||
下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle-stratum | 上层 Super-stratum | 下层 Substrate | 中层 Middle-stratum | 上层 Super-stratum | |||||||||||
NNI | 5.6±0.4a | 6.3±0.9a | 6.4±0.8a | 103.6±9.7a | 66.7±5.1a | 56.1±3.7a | ||||||||||
LNI | 3.6±0.5b | 4.4±0.8b | 6.2±0.9a | 92.1±13.4a | 54.1±3.7b | 47.5±6.9a | ||||||||||
HNI | 1.6±0.8c | 2.4±0.7c | 5.8±0.9a | 42.1±5.4b | 44.1±3.7c | 30.8±4.3b | ||||||||||
p | 0.032 | 0.049 | 0.388 | 0.000 4 | 0.000 3 | 0.000 6 |
[1] | Biging GS, Dobbertin M (1992). Comparisonofdistance-depen dentcompetitionmeasuresforheightandbasalareagrowthofindividualconifertrees. ForestScience, 38,695-720. |
[2] | Biging GS, Dobbertin M (1995). Evaluationofcompetitionin dicesinindividualtreegrowthmodels. ForestScience, 41,360-377. |
[3] | Caldwell MM (1987). Plantarchitectureandresourcecompetition.In:SchulzeED, ZwoiferHeds.EcologicalStudies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 61,164-179. |
[4] | Donald CM (1958). Theinteractionofcompetitionforlightandfornutrients. JournalofAgricultureResearch, 9,421-435. |
[5] | Fowler N (1982). CompetitionandcoexistenceinaNorthCar olinagrasslandⅢ. Mixturesofcomponentspecies.JournalofEcology, 70,77-92. |
[6] | Hampus H (2002). Estimationofsingle-treecharacteristicsusingthekNNmethodandplotwiseaerialphotographinterpreta tions. ForestEcologyandManagement, 167,303-314. |
[7] | Iina J, Pukkala T (2002). Applicationofecologicalfieldtheoryindistance-dependentgrowthmodeling. ForestEcologyandManagement, 161,101-107. |
[8] | Jessica G, Paul W, Judy LS, Paul T, Robert JS (1990). Compe titionamongold-fieldperennialsatdifferentlevelsofsoilfer tilityandavailablespace. JournalofEcology, 78,727-744. |
[9] | Keedy PA (1994). Competitioneffectandresponserankingin20wetlandplants:aretheyconsistentacrossthreeenviron ment. JournalofEcology, 82,635-643. |
[10] |
Küppers M (1985). CarbonrelationsandcompetitionbetweenwoodyspeciesinaCentralEuropeanhedgerow. Oecologia, 66,343-352.
DOI URL |
[11] | Law R, Purves DW, Murrell DJ, Dieckmann U (2002). Causesandeffectsofsmall-scalespatialstructurein plantpopula tions. InternationalInstituteforAppliedSystemsAnalysisSchlossplatz1A-2361Laxenburg,Austria,1-24. |
[12] | Li YX (黎云祥), Liu YC (刘玉成) (1996). TheneighborhoodmodularinterferenceeffectsofseedlingofGordoniaacumi nata. JournalofSouthwestChinaNormalUniversity (Nat uralScienceEdition) (西南师范大学学报 (自然科学版) ), 21,271-275. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[13] | Mack R, Harper JL (1977). Interferenceincloneannualsspatialpat ternandneighborhoodeffects. JournalofEcology, 65,345-363. |
[14] | Martin RG, William KL, Debrap P (2001). Intensityofintra-andinterspecificcompetitionincoexistingshortgrassspecies. JournalofEcology, 89,40-47. |
[15] | Purves DW, Law R (2002). ExperimentalderivationoffunctionsrelatinggrowthofArabidopsisthalianatoneighborsizeanddistance. JournalofEcology, 90,882-894. |
[16] | Regnier EE, Stoller EW (1989). Theeffectsofsoybean (Glycinemax) interferenceonthecanopyarchitectureofcommoncocklebur (Xanthiumstrumarium), jimsonweed (Daturastramonium), andvelvetleaf (Abutilontheophrasti). WeedScience, 37,187-195. |
[17] | Song DQ (宋丁全), Jing ZL (姜志林), Zheng ZM (郑作孟), He WP (何文平) (2002). NeighborhoodinterferenceindexinBetulalu miniteracommunity. ChineseJournalofEcology (生态学杂志), 21 (3),15-17. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[18] | Toshiya Y, Tomohiko K (2000). Interspecificcompetitionamongthreecanopy-treespeciesinamixed-specieseven-agedforestofcentralJapan. ForestEcologyandManagement, 137,221-230. |
[19] | Trenbath BR (1974). Neighbouraffectsinthegenus.Ⅱ.Comparisonofweedspecies. JournalofApplicationEcology, 11,111-125. |
[20] | Wang ZG (王志高), Wang XA (王孝安), Xiao YP (肖娅萍) (2003). StudiesonnicheofdominantspeciesinLarixchinensiscommuni ties. ActaBotanicaBoreali-OccidentaliaSinica (西北植物学报), 23,1780-1783. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[21] | Wang ZQ (王政权), Wang JB (王军邦), Sun ZH (孙志虎), Fan ZQ (范志强), Han YZ (韩有志) (2003). Quantitativestudyofbelow-andabove-groundcompetitionsinMandchuricanashseedlings. ActaEcologicaSinica (生态学报), 23,1512-1518. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[22] | William AN, Adam MG (1999). GrowthandbranchinghabitofEu calyptusnitensatdifferentspacingandtheeffectonfinalcropse lection. ForestEcologyandManagement, 123,217-229. |
[23] | Wu GS (吴巩胜), Wang ZQ (王政权) (2000). IndividualtreegrowthcompetitionmodelinmixedplantationofManchurianashandDahurianlarch. ChineseJournalofApplicationE cology (应用生态学报), 11,646-650. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[24] | Wu RL (邬荣领), Hu JJ (胡建军), Han YF (韩一凡), Liu HX (刘红霞) (2002). Howphenotypicplasticityaffectcrownarchitectureanddevelopmentinwoodyplants. ScientiaSilvaeSinicae (林业科学), 38,141-156. (inEnglishwithChineseabstract). |
[25] |
Xiang YC (向言词), Peng SL (彭少麟), Cai XA (蔡锡安), Ren H (任海), Zhou HC (周厚诚) (2003). Changesinplantcompetitionwiththedevelopmenttogaps. ActaPhytoecologicaSinica (植物生态学报), 27,99-102. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract).
DOI |
[26] | Xiao CW (肖春旺), Liu YC (刘玉成) (1997). CharacteristicsofadaptationofGordoniaacuminataseedlingsindifferentneighbors. ActaPhytoecologicaSinica (植物生态学报), 21,274-284. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[27] | Xu CY (徐程扬) (2001). ResponseofstructuralplasticityofTiliaamurensissaplingcrownstodifferentlightconditions. ChineseJournalofAppliedEcology (应用生态学报), 12,339-343. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[28] | Zhang YX (张跃西) (1993). Studyontheimprovementandap plicationoftheneighborhoodinterferenceindexmodel. ActaPhytoecologicaetGeobotanicaSinica (植物生态学与地植物学学报), 17,352-357. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[29] | Zhang YX (张跃西), Zhong ZC (钟章成) (1999). Advancesofneighborhoodinterferenceamongwoodyplants. ChineseJournalofEcology (生态学杂志), 18 (2),55-59. (inChi nesewithEnglishabstract). |
[30] | Zhang YX (张跃西), Zhong ZC (钟章成) (2003). Competitiveeffectandresponseamongthedominantspeciesinsubtropicsecondaryevergreenbroadleavedforest. ChineseJournalofAppliedEnvironmentalBiology (应用与环境生物学报), 9,333-335. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[31] | Zhang ZP (张泽浦), Fang JY (方精云), Kan M (菅诚) (2000). Effectsofcompetitionongrowthrateandprobabilityofdeathofplantindividuals:astudybasedonnurseryexperimentsofLarixlep tolepispopulations. ActaPhytoecologicaSinica (植物生态学报), 24,340-345. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[32] | Zou CJ (邹春静), Xu WD (徐文铎) (1998). Studyonintraspe cificandinterspecificcompetitionofPiceamongolica. ActaPhytoecologicaSinica (植物生态学报), 22,269-274. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
[33] | Zou CJ (邹春静), Han SJ (韩士杰), Zhang JH (张军辉) (2001). Competitionrelationshipamongtreespeciesinbroad-leavedKoreanpinemixedforestanditssignificanceforman agingtheforest. ChineseJournalofEcology (生态学杂志), 20 (4),35-38. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract). |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn