Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 185-194.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0118
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Shu-Lin,LU Wei-Hua(),CHEN Yi-Shi,JING Peng-Cheng
Online:
2018-02-20
Published:
2018-04-16
Contact:
Wei-Hua LU ORCID:0000-0003-0776-8912
Supported by:
WANG Shu-Lin, LU Wei-Hua, CHEN Yi-Shi, JING Peng-Cheng. Effect of sheep digestive tract on the recovery and germination of seeds of fifteen leguminous plants in the northern Xinjiang region, China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(2): 185-194.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2017.0118
种名 Species | 单粒质量 Single seed mass (mg) | 形状指数 Shape index | 种名 Species | 单粒质量 Single seed mass (mg) | 形状指数 Shape index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
洋甘草 Glycyrrhiza glabra | 6.69 ± 0.03 | 0.001 ± 0.000 | 骆驼刺 Alhagi sparsifolia | 4.47 ± 0.03 | 0.070 ± 0.007 |
草木犀 Melilotus officinalis | 2.17 ± 0.02 | 0.050 ± 0.010 | 山羊豆 Galega officinalis | 6.22 ± 0.03 | 0.070 ± 0.006 |
苦马豆 Sphaerophysa salsula | 7.28 ± 0.02 | 0.070 ± 0.010 | 铃铛刺 Halimodendron halodendron | 15.73 ± 0.05 | 0.070 ± 0.005 |
蒙古黄耆 Astragalus mongholicus | 10.59 ± 0.02 | 0.100 ± 0.003 | 野苜蓿 Medicago falcata | 1.98 ± 0.01 | 0.070 ± 0.010 |
木黄耆 Astragalus arbuscula | 3.72 ± 0.03 | 0.120 ± 0.004 | 细叶野豌豆 Vicia tenuifolia | 14.84 ± 0.06 | 0.001 ± 0.001 |
新疆棘豆 Oxytropis sinkiangensis | 2.63 ± 0.03 | 0.070 ± 0.001 | 狐尾黄耆 Astragalus alopecurus | 34.42 ± 0.12 | 0.070 ± 0.001 |
多叶锦鸡儿 Caragana pleiophylla | 37.68 ± 0.07 | 0.070 ± 0.010 | 弯果胡卢巴 Trigonella arcuata | 1.50 ± 0.03 | 0.100 ± 0.008 |
野火球 Trifolium lupinaster | 1.67 ± 0.01 | 0.070 ± 0.010 |
Table 1 Single seed mass and seed shape index of seeds of fifteen leguminous species (mean ± SE)
种名 Species | 单粒质量 Single seed mass (mg) | 形状指数 Shape index | 种名 Species | 单粒质量 Single seed mass (mg) | 形状指数 Shape index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
洋甘草 Glycyrrhiza glabra | 6.69 ± 0.03 | 0.001 ± 0.000 | 骆驼刺 Alhagi sparsifolia | 4.47 ± 0.03 | 0.070 ± 0.007 |
草木犀 Melilotus officinalis | 2.17 ± 0.02 | 0.050 ± 0.010 | 山羊豆 Galega officinalis | 6.22 ± 0.03 | 0.070 ± 0.006 |
苦马豆 Sphaerophysa salsula | 7.28 ± 0.02 | 0.070 ± 0.010 | 铃铛刺 Halimodendron halodendron | 15.73 ± 0.05 | 0.070 ± 0.005 |
蒙古黄耆 Astragalus mongholicus | 10.59 ± 0.02 | 0.100 ± 0.003 | 野苜蓿 Medicago falcata | 1.98 ± 0.01 | 0.070 ± 0.010 |
木黄耆 Astragalus arbuscula | 3.72 ± 0.03 | 0.120 ± 0.004 | 细叶野豌豆 Vicia tenuifolia | 14.84 ± 0.06 | 0.001 ± 0.001 |
新疆棘豆 Oxytropis sinkiangensis | 2.63 ± 0.03 | 0.070 ± 0.001 | 狐尾黄耆 Astragalus alopecurus | 34.42 ± 0.12 | 0.070 ± 0.001 |
多叶锦鸡儿 Caragana pleiophylla | 37.68 ± 0.07 | 0.070 ± 0.010 | 弯果胡卢巴 Trigonella arcuata | 1.50 ± 0.03 | 0.100 ± 0.008 |
野火球 Trifolium lupinaster | 1.67 ± 0.01 | 0.070 ± 0.010 |
种名 Species | 种子回收率 SRP (%) | 平均滞留时间 MRT (h) | 种名 Species | 种子回收率 SRP (%) | 平均滞留时间 MRT (h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
洋甘草 Glycyrrhiza glabra | 39.25 ± 20.40a | 31.62 ± 0.73bcd | 骆驼刺 Alhagi sparsifolia | 25.06 ± 9.25ab | 28.27 ± 0.27bcd |
草木犀 Melilotus officinalis | 4.28 ± 1.76c | 37.19 ± 2.12ab | 山羊豆 Galega officinalis | 38.02 ± 9.60a | 27.55 ± 1.75bcd |
苦马豆 Sphaerophysa salsula | 38.60 ± 19.77a | 32.48 ± 0.39abcd | 铃铛刺 Halimodendron halodendron | 34.56 ± 15.89a | 36.51 ± 5.93ab |
蒙古黄耆 Astragalus mongholicus | 4.88 ± 1.02c | 36.62 ± 0.54ab | 野苜蓿 Medicago falcata | 9.41 ± 1.26bc | 24.58 ± 0.84cd |
木黄耆 Astragalus arbuscula | 5.02 ± 1.25c | 32.51 ± 3.93abcd | 细叶野豌豆 Vicia tenuifolia | 34.90 ± 2.27a | 32.78 ± 2.94abcd |
新疆棘豆 Oxytropis sinkiangensis | 16.04 ± 4.11bc | 22.33 ± 0.77d | 狐尾黄耆 Astragalus alopecurus | 25.61 ± 11.75ab | 34.60 ± 0.84abc |
多叶锦鸡儿 Caragana pleiophylla | 8.93 ± 4.24bc | 33.76 ± 1.19abc | 弯果胡卢巴 Trigonella arcuata | 6.65 ± 1.44c | 24.95 ± 1.34cd |
野火球 Trifolium lupinaster | 14.01 ± 7.18bc | 30.04 ± 1.49bcd |
Table 2 Seed recovery percentages and mean retention time of 15 leguminous species after sheep ingestion (mean ± SE)
种名 Species | 种子回收率 SRP (%) | 平均滞留时间 MRT (h) | 种名 Species | 种子回收率 SRP (%) | 平均滞留时间 MRT (h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
洋甘草 Glycyrrhiza glabra | 39.25 ± 20.40a | 31.62 ± 0.73bcd | 骆驼刺 Alhagi sparsifolia | 25.06 ± 9.25ab | 28.27 ± 0.27bcd |
草木犀 Melilotus officinalis | 4.28 ± 1.76c | 37.19 ± 2.12ab | 山羊豆 Galega officinalis | 38.02 ± 9.60a | 27.55 ± 1.75bcd |
苦马豆 Sphaerophysa salsula | 38.60 ± 19.77a | 32.48 ± 0.39abcd | 铃铛刺 Halimodendron halodendron | 34.56 ± 15.89a | 36.51 ± 5.93ab |
蒙古黄耆 Astragalus mongholicus | 4.88 ± 1.02c | 36.62 ± 0.54ab | 野苜蓿 Medicago falcata | 9.41 ± 1.26bc | 24.58 ± 0.84cd |
木黄耆 Astragalus arbuscula | 5.02 ± 1.25c | 32.51 ± 3.93abcd | 细叶野豌豆 Vicia tenuifolia | 34.90 ± 2.27a | 32.78 ± 2.94abcd |
新疆棘豆 Oxytropis sinkiangensis | 16.04 ± 4.11bc | 22.33 ± 0.77d | 狐尾黄耆 Astragalus alopecurus | 25.61 ± 11.75ab | 34.60 ± 0.84abc |
多叶锦鸡儿 Caragana pleiophylla | 8.93 ± 4.24bc | 33.76 ± 1.19abc | 弯果胡卢巴 Trigonella arcuata | 6.65 ± 1.44c | 24.95 ± 1.34cd |
野火球 Trifolium lupinaster | 14.01 ± 7.18bc | 30.04 ± 1.49bcd |
种名 Species | 萌发率 Germination rates (%) | 萌发率增值 Appreciation of germination rates (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 消化后 After sheep ingested | ||
洋甘草 Glycyrrhiza glabra | 15.36 ± 5.55b | 68.41 ± 13.86a | 53.05 |
草木犀 Melilotus officinalis | 6.67 ± 1.16b | 23.68 ± 1.67a | 17.01 |
苦马豆 Sphaerophysa salsula | 15.00 ± 7.00b | 71.01 ± 3.62a | 56.01 |
蒙古黄耆 Astragalus mongholicus | 14.33 ± 3.22b | 25.00 ± 3.61a | 10.67 |
木黄耆 Astragalus arbuscula | 45.00 ± 2.00b | 53.70 ± 1.57a | 8.70 |
新疆棘豆 Oxytropis sinkiangensis | 33.33 ± 1.54a | 35.39 ± 3.08a | 2.06 |
多叶锦鸡儿 Caragana pleiophylla | 96.22 ± 6.33a | 35.17 ± 3.32b | -61.05 |
野火球 Trifolium lupinaster | 28.33 ± 3.06a | 21.43 ± 3.11a | -6.90 |
骆驼刺 Alhagi sparsifolia | 8.33 ± 3.51b | 42.25 ± 2.63a | 33.92 |
山羊豆 Galega officinalis | 13.33 ± 1.53a | 14.45 ± 1.27a | 1.12 |
铃铛刺 Halimodendron halodendron | 1.67 ± 0.58b | 11.96 ± 2.00a | 10.29 |
野苜蓿 Medicago falcata | 7.82 ± 1.05b | 62.36 ± 3.01a | 54.54 |
细叶野豌豆 Vicia tenuifolia | 8.33 ± 0.58b | 28.52 ± 6.73a | 20.19 |
狐尾黄耆 Astragalus alopecurus | 6.30 ± 2.14a | 5.83 ± 2.56a | -0.47 |
弯果胡卢巴 Trigonella arcuata | 5.20 ± 1.31b | 20.32 ± 5.51a | 15.12 |
Table 3 Germination percentages of seeds of 15 leguminous species before and after sheep ingestion (mean ± SE)
种名 Species | 萌发率 Germination rates (%) | 萌发率增值 Appreciation of germination rates (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 消化后 After sheep ingested | ||
洋甘草 Glycyrrhiza glabra | 15.36 ± 5.55b | 68.41 ± 13.86a | 53.05 |
草木犀 Melilotus officinalis | 6.67 ± 1.16b | 23.68 ± 1.67a | 17.01 |
苦马豆 Sphaerophysa salsula | 15.00 ± 7.00b | 71.01 ± 3.62a | 56.01 |
蒙古黄耆 Astragalus mongholicus | 14.33 ± 3.22b | 25.00 ± 3.61a | 10.67 |
木黄耆 Astragalus arbuscula | 45.00 ± 2.00b | 53.70 ± 1.57a | 8.70 |
新疆棘豆 Oxytropis sinkiangensis | 33.33 ± 1.54a | 35.39 ± 3.08a | 2.06 |
多叶锦鸡儿 Caragana pleiophylla | 96.22 ± 6.33a | 35.17 ± 3.32b | -61.05 |
野火球 Trifolium lupinaster | 28.33 ± 3.06a | 21.43 ± 3.11a | -6.90 |
骆驼刺 Alhagi sparsifolia | 8.33 ± 3.51b | 42.25 ± 2.63a | 33.92 |
山羊豆 Galega officinalis | 13.33 ± 1.53a | 14.45 ± 1.27a | 1.12 |
铃铛刺 Halimodendron halodendron | 1.67 ± 0.58b | 11.96 ± 2.00a | 10.29 |
野苜蓿 Medicago falcata | 7.82 ± 1.05b | 62.36 ± 3.01a | 54.54 |
细叶野豌豆 Vicia tenuifolia | 8.33 ± 0.58b | 28.52 ± 6.73a | 20.19 |
狐尾黄耆 Astragalus alopecurus | 6.30 ± 2.14a | 5.83 ± 2.56a | -0.47 |
弯果胡卢巴 Trigonella arcuata | 5.20 ± 1.31b | 20.32 ± 5.51a | 15.12 |
[1] | Baskin CC, Baskin JM ( 2014). Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York. |
[2] |
Blackshaw RE, Rode LM ( 1991). Effect of ensiling and rumen digestion by cattle on weed seed viability. Weed Science, 39, 104-108.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Brochet AL, Guillemain M, Gauthier-Clerc M, Fritz H, Green AJ ( 2010). Endozoochory of Mediterranean aquatic plant seeds by teal after a period of desiccation: Determinants of seed survival and influence of retention time on germinability and viability. Aquatic Botany, 93, 99-106.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Calvi?o-Cancela M, Martín-Herrero J ( 2009). Effectiveness of a varied assemblage of seed dispersers of a fleshy-fruited plant. Ecology, 90, 3503-3515.
DOI URL PMID |
[5] | Chen BJ ( 2008). Legume forage resources and floristic characteristics in Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science, 25(4), 42-45. |
[ 陈本建 ( 2008). 甘肃省豆科牧草资源及植物区系分析. 草业科学, 25(4), 42-45.] | |
[6] |
Cosyns E, Delporte A, Lens L, Hoffmann M ( 2005). Germination success of temperate grassland species after passage through ungulate and rabbit guts. Journal of Ecology, 93, 353-361.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Couvreur M, Cosyns E, Hermy M, Hoffmann M ( 2005). Complementarity of epi- and endozoochory of plant seeds by free ranging donkeys. Ecography, 28, 37-48.
DOI URL |
[8] |
D’Hondt B, Hoffmann M ( 2011). A reassessment of the role of simple seed traits in mortality following herbivore ingestion. Plant Biology, 13, 118-124.
DOI URL PMID |
[9] | G?kbulak F ( 2002). Effect of American bison ( Bison bison L.) on the recovery and germinability of seeds of range forage species. Grass & Forage Science, 57, 395-400. |
[10] |
G?kbulak F ( 2006). Recovery and germination of grass seeds ingested by cattle. The Journal of Biological Sciences, 6, 23-27.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Grande D, Martinvicente A ( 2013). Endozoochorus seed dispersal by goats: Recovery, germinability and emergence of five Mediterranean shrub species. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11, 347-355.
DOI URL |
[12] | Han JG ( 2007). Grassland Science. 3rd edn. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. |
[ 韩建国 ( 2007). 草地学. 第三版. 中国农业出版社, 北京.] | |
[13] | Heidrun W, Oliver T ( 2008). A mechanistic simulation model of seed dispersal by animals. Journal of Ecology, 96, 1011-1022. |
[14] | Janzen DH ( 1977). Variation in seed size within a crop of a costa rican Mucuna andreana( Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany, 64, 347-349. |
[15] | Janzen DH ( 1984). Dispersal of small seeds by big herbivores: Foliage is the fruit. The American Naturalist, 123, 338-353. |
[16] | Jaroszewicz B ( 2013). Endozoochory by European bison influences the build-up of the soil seed bank in subcontinental coniferous forest. European Journal of Forest Research, 132, 445-452. |
[17] | Jurado E, Estrada E, Moles A ( 2001). Characterizing plant attributes with particular emphasis on seeds in Tamaulipan thornscrub in semi-arid Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments, 48, 309-321. |
[18] | Klein J ( 1981). La Mesta. 2nd edn. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, Spain. |
[19] | Lu WH, Wan JJ, Yang JJ, Ren AT, Yu L ( 2013). Review of endozoochory of plant seeds by herbivores. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 22, 306-313. |
[ 鲁为华, 万娟娟, 杨洁晶, 任爱天, 于磊 ( 2013). 草食动物对植物种子的消化道传播研究进展. 草业学报, 22, 306-313.] | |
[20] | Ma SB, Jiang HQ ( 1999). Study on the seed weight and seed seize variation pattern and their biological significance in Podophylloideae (Berberjdaceae). Acta Botanica Boreali-?Occidentalia Sinica, 19, 715-724. |
[ 马绍宾, 姜汉侨 ( 1999). 小檗科鬼臼亚科种子大小变异式样及其生物学意义. 西北植物学报, 19, 715-724.] | |
[21] | Mancilla-Leytón JM, Fernández-Alés R, Vicente AM ( 2012). Plant-ungulate interaction: Goat gut passage effect on survival and germination of Mediterranean shrub seeds. Journal of Vegetation Science, 22, 1031-1037. |
[22] | Manzano P, Malo JE, Peco B ( 2005). Sheep gut passage and survival of Mediterranean shrub seeds. Seed Science Research, 15, 21-28. |
[23] | Miloti? T, Hoffmann M ( 2016). How does gut passage impact endozoochorous seed dispersal success? Evidence from a gut environment simulation experiment. Basic and Applied Ecology, 17, 165-176. |
[24] | Mou XM, Yu YW, Zhang HM, Sun H, Wang HC, Xu CL, Hua LM ( 2013). Effects of yakdung deposition on community characteristics and niche parameters in alpine meadow. Pratacultural Science, 30, 1594-1601. |
[ 牟晓明, 于应文, 张红梅, 孙红, 王虎成, 徐长林, 花力民 ( 2013). 牦牛粪对高寒草甸植被群落特征和生态位参数的影响. 草业科学, 30, 1594-1601.] | |
[25] | Mouissie AM, Veen CEJVD, Veen GF, Diggelen RV ( 2005 a). Ecological correlates of seed survival after ingestion by fallow deer. Functional Ecology, 19, 284-290. |
[26] | Mouissie AM, Vos P, Verhagen HMC, Bakker JP ( 2005 b). Endozoochory by free-ranging, large herbivores: Ecological correlates and perspectives for restoration. Basic and Applied Ecology, 6, 547-558. |
[27] | Myers JA, Vellend M, Gardescu S, Marks PL ( 2004). Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: Implications for long-????distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia, 139, 35-44. |
[28] | Oudtshoorn KVRV, Rooyen MWV ( 1998). Dispersal Biology of Desert Plants. Springer, Berlin. |
[29] | Pan L, Niu JL, Bu PD, Du H, Cheng JB, Sun XZ, Wang XM, Qin JJ, Yuan YM, Zhang XK ( 2015). Effects of saikosaponin on in vitro fermentation parameters and bacterial quantity. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 24(6), 85-91. |
[ 潘龙, 牛俊丽, 卜登攀, 杜洪, 程建波, 孙先枝, 王秀敏, 秦俊杰, 袁耀明, 张幸开 ( 2015). 柴胡皂苷对体外发酵参数及细菌数量变化的影响. 草业学报, 24(6), 85-91.] | |
[30] | Plumptre AJ ( 2003). Seed germination and early seedling establishment of some elephant-dispersed species in Banyang-?mbo wildlife sanctuary, South-western Cameroon. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 19, 229-237. |
[31] | Ramos ME, Robles AB, Castro J ( 2006). Efficiency of endozoochorous seed dispersal in six dry-fruited species (Cistaceae): From seed ingestion to early seedling establishment. Plant Ecology, 185, 97-106. |
[32] | Russi L, Cocks PS, Roberts EH ( 1992). The fate of Legume seeds eaten by sheep from a Mediterranean grassland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 772-778. |
[33] | Soons MB, van der Vlugt C, Van Lith B, Heil GW, Klaassen M ( 2008). Small seed size increases the potential for dispersal of wetland plants by ducks. Journal of Ecology, 96, 619-627. |
[34] | Spiegel O, Nathan R ( 2007). Incorporating dispersal distance into the disperser effectiveness framework: Frugivorous birds provide complementary dispersal to plants in a patchy environment. Ecology Letters, 10, 718-728. |
[35] | Thompson K, Band SR, Hodgson JG ( 1993). Seed size and shape predict persistance in soil. Functional Ecology, 7, 236-241. |
[36] | Thomson FJ, Moles AT, Auld TD, Kingsford RT ( 2011). Seed dispersal distance is more strongly correlated with plant height than with seed mass. Journal of Ecology, 99, 1299-1307. |
[37] | Wali N, Wang SL, Zhao G, Yang JJ, Lü YP, Lu WH ( 2016). Effect of sheep digestion on morphology, recovery and germinability of four Leguminous plants seed. Pratacultural Science, 33, 1566-1573. |
[ 娜丽克斯·外里, 王树林, 赵刚, 杨洁晶, 吕艳萍, 鲁为华 ( 2016). 4种豆科牧草种子对绵羊消化道作用的反应. 草业科学, 33, 1566-1573.] | |
[38] | Wan JJ, Yang JJ, Ren AT, Ma CH, Yu L, Lu WH ( 2013). Effects of herbivores on seed germination by meta analysis. Pratacultural Science, 30, 1852-1861. |
[ 万娟娟, 杨洁晶, 任爱天, 马春晖, 于磊, 鲁为华 ( 2013). 草食动物影响植物种子萌发的整合分析. 草业科学, 30, 1852-1861.] | |
[39] | Wang BC, Smith TB ( 2002). Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 379-386. |
[40] | Wang CJ, Wang WQ, Lu WH, Wen CL, Yin XJ, Zhao QZ ( 2016). Feed intake distribution model for herd based on grazing spatio-temporal trajectory data. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(13), 125-130. |
[ 汪传建, 王伟强, 鲁为华, 文春雷, 尹小君, 赵庆展 ( 2016). 基于放牧时空轨迹数据的牧群采食量分布模型. 农业工程学报, 32(13), 125-130.] | |
[41] | Wang SL, Lu WH, Wali N, Ma CH, Zhang QB, Wang CJ ( 2017). Recovery and germination of seeds after passage through the gut of Kazakh sheep on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains. Seed Science Research, 27, 43-49. |
[42] | Wang SL, Wali N, Lu WH, Wang WQ, Wang CJ ( 2017). Morphological characteristics of six kinds of mucilaginous seeds and their response to digestion in rumen of sheep. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 26(4), 89-98. |
[ 王树林, 娜丽克斯·外里, 鲁为华, 王伟强, 汪传建 ( 2017). 六种粘液种子性状多样性及其对绵羊瘤胃消化的反应. 草业学报, 26(4), 89-98.] | |
[43] | Willms WD, Acharya SN, Rode LM ( 1995). Feasibility of using cattle to disperse cicer milkvetch ( Astragalus cicer L.) seed in pastures. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 75, 173-175. |
[44] | Yan XH, An SZ, Yu X, Jia SB, Pan XD, Cheng FX, Li H ( 2009). Observation on grazing behavior of Kazak sheep in summer. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 32(4), 38-40. |
[ 闫学慧, 安沙舟, 余雄, 贾帅兵, 潘晓东, 程发祥, 李海 ( 2009). 哈萨克羊夏季牧食行为观测. 新疆农业大学学报, 32(4), 38-40.] | |
[45] | Yang JJ, Wan JJ, Wali N, Ren AT, Lu WH ( 2015). Seed morphology and effect of sheep rumen digestion on germinability of 28 grass of Tianshan. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 24(2), 104-115. |
[ 杨洁晶, 万娟娟, 娜丽克斯·外里, 任爱天, 鲁为华 ( 2015). 28种植物种子形态学性状及其萌发对绵羊瘤胃消化的反应. 草业学报, 24(2), 104-115.] | |
[46] | Yu L, Lu WH, Yan P, Luo LJ, Zhang QB ( 2014). Resources and assessment of natural grassland in Shaertao Mountains, Zhaosu County in Xinjiang. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 36(6), 4-11. |
[ 于磊, 鲁为华, 阎平, 罗良俊, 张前兵 ( 2014). 新疆昭苏县境沙尔套山天然草地植物资源与评价. 中国草地学报, 36(6), 4-11.] | |
[47] | Yu XJ, Xu CL, Wang F, Shang ZH, Long RJ ( 2012). Recovery and germinability of seeds ingested by yaks and Tibetan sheep could have important effects on the population dynamics of alpine meadow plants on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Rangeland Journal, 34, 249-255. |
[48] | Zhao LL, Wang ZL, Du JC, Li QF, Song CL ( 2007). The effect of sulfuric acid treatment on hard seeds of Melimotoides ruthenica strains. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 29(3), 73-77. |
[ 赵丽丽, 王照兰, 杜建材, 李青丰, 宋彩玲 ( 2007). 硫酸处理打破扁蓿豆不同品系种子硬实的效果研究. 中国草地学报, 29(3), 73-77.] |
[1] | WANG Zu-Xing, HE Wei-Ming. Effects of soil-burial depths on the relationship between seed mass and seed emergence [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(10): 899-908. |
[2] | Dao-Xin LI, Guo LI, Ze-Hao SHEN, Shen-Dong XU, Qing-Yu HAN, Gong-Fang WANG, Feng-Lei TIAN. Growth-form regulates the altitudinal variation of interspecific seed mass of woody plants in Mt. Dalaoling, the Three Gorges Region, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(5): 539-548. |
[3] | CHEN Yan-Song, ZHOU Shou-Biao, OU Zu-Lan, XU Zhong-Dong, HONG Xin. Seed mass variation in common plant species in Wanfoshan Natural Reservation Region, Anhui, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(8): 739-746. |
[4] | LIU Hui-Liang, ZHANG Yong-Kuan, ZHANG Dao-Yuan, YIN Lin-Ke, ZHANG Yuan-Ming. Variation in fruit and seed traits and seed germination among different populations of Eremosparton songoricum [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(8): 802-811. |
[5] | LIU Wen, LIU Kun, ZHANG Chun-Hui, DU Guo-Zhen. Effect of accumulated temperature on seed germination—a case study of 12 Compositae species on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(7): 751-758. |
[6] | YU Shun-Li, CHEN Hong-Wei, LI Hui. REVIEW OF ADVANCES IN ECOLOGY OF SEED MASS [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(6): 989-997. |
[7] | QUAN Zhan-Jun, CHENG Hong, YU Yun-Jiang, ZOU Xue-Yong. ASSESSMENT OF SUBSIDENCE IMPACT ON VEGETATION LANDSCAPE IN COAL MINING AREA —A CASE STUDY OF DONGDA MINE IN JINCHENG CITY, SHANXI PROVINCE [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(3): 414-420. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn