Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1219-1227.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0170
• Research Articles • Next Articles
LIU Xiang-Yu1,2,3, HE Dong1,2,3, TIAN Wen-Bin4, SONG Yan-Jun1,2,3, YIN Fang1,2,3, XU Ming-Shan1,2,3, CHENG Jun-Yang1,2,3, YAN En-Rong1,2,3,*()
Online:
2017-12-10
Published:
2018-02-23
Contact:
YAN En-Rong
LIU Xiang-Yu, HE Dong, TIAN Wen-Bin, SONG Yan-Jun, YIN Fang, XU Ming-Shan, CHENG Jun-Yang, YAN En-Rong. Patterns of species associations in woody plants in forest communities of Putuoshan Island, Zhejiang, China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(12): 1219-1227.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2017.0170
20 m × 20 m | 10 m × 10 m | |
---|---|---|
正负比 Ratio of positive to negative associations (PNR) (%) | 49.00 | 27.00 |
正关联比例 Proportion of positive associations (PPA) (%) | 33.01 | 21.55 |
负关联比例 Proportion of negative associations (PNA) (%) | 66.99 | 78.45 |
显著比 Proportion of significant associations (PSA) (%) | 13.63 | 14.61 |
显著正关联比例 Proportion of significant positive associations (%) | 1.87 | 3.06 |
显著负关联比例 Proportion of significant negative associations (%) | 11.76 | 11.55 |
Table 1 Characteristics of species associations in forest communities at different spatial scales on Putuoshan Island, Zhejiang Province
20 m × 20 m | 10 m × 10 m | |
---|---|---|
正负比 Ratio of positive to negative associations (PNR) (%) | 49.00 | 27.00 |
正关联比例 Proportion of positive associations (PPA) (%) | 33.01 | 21.55 |
负关联比例 Proportion of negative associations (PNA) (%) | 66.99 | 78.45 |
显著比 Proportion of significant associations (PSA) (%) | 13.63 | 14.61 |
显著正关联比例 Proportion of significant positive associations (%) | 1.87 | 3.06 |
显著负关联比例 Proportion of significant negative associations (%) | 11.76 | 11.55 |
Fig. 2 The correlation between co-dominance propensity of species pairs (logarithmically transformed) and species association intensities (AC) at different spatial scales. A, 10 m × 10 m scale. B, 20 m × 20 m scale.
Fig. 3 Comparisons of observed species associations and expected species associations by chance in the 20 m × 20 m plots. A, Variance ratio. B, Proportion of significant associations. C, Ratio of positive to negative associations. D, Proportion of positive associations. Solid lines represent the observed values, and dash lines represent expected values in randomized communities with 2.5th-97.5th percentiles.
AppendixⅠ Differences between observed species associations and expected species associations by chance at the 10 m × 10 m scaleA, Variance ratio. B, Proportion of significant associations. C, Ratio of positive to negative associations. D, Proportion of positive associations. Solid lines represent the observed values, and dash lines represent expected values in randomized communities with 2.5th-97.5th percentiles.
1 |
Brown JH (1984). On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species.The American Naturalist, 124, 255-279.
DOI URL |
2 |
Chase JM (2014). Spatial scale resolves the niche versus neutral theory debate.Journal of Vegetation Science, 25, 319-322.
DOI URL |
3 | Clements FE (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington. |
4 |
Connor EF, Simberloff D (1983). Interspecific competition and species co-occurrence patterns on islands: Null models and the evaluation of evidence.Oikos, 41, 455-465.
DOI URL |
5 | Deng XL, Liu YC, Wu Y (2003). Interconnection among dominant plant populations ofCastanopsis community in Jinggang Mountain Nature Reserve. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 27, 531-536.(in Chinese with English abstract) [邓贤兰, 刘玉成, 吴杨 (2003). 井冈山自然保护区栲属群落优势种群的种间联结关系研究. 植物生态学报, 27, 531-536.] |
6 | Diamond J (1975). Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM eds. Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA. 342-344. |
7 |
Dice LR (1945). Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species.Ecology, 26, 297-302.
DOI URL |
8 | Dray S, Dufour AB (2007). The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists.Journal of Statistical, 22, 1-20. |
9 |
Gleason HA (1926). The individualistic concept of the plant association.Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 53, 7-26.
DOI URL |
10 |
Gotelli NJ, McCabe DJ (2002). Species co-occurrence: A meta- analysis of JM Diamond’s assembly rules model.Ecology, 83, 2091-2096.
DOI URL |
11 |
Gotelli NJ, McGill BJ (2006). Null versus neutral models: What’s the difference? Ecography, 29, 793-800.
DOI URL |
12 | He D (2016). Plant Functional Trait Variation and Community Assembly: A Case Study in a Subtropical Evergreen Forest. PhD dissertation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.(in Chinese with English abstract) [何东 (2016). 植物功能性状变异与群落构建:以黑石顶常绿阔叶林为例. 博士学位论文, 中山大学, 广州.] |
13 |
Hirsch JE (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output.Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572.
DOI URL |
14 |
Hubbell SP (2001). The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography.Science, 293, 1772.
DOI URL |
15 |
Hubbell SP (2005). Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence.Functional Ecology, 19, 166-172.
DOI URL |
16 | Jian MF, Liu QJ, Zhu D, You H (2009). Inter-specific correlations among dominant populations of tree layer species in evergreen broad-leaved forest in Jiulianshan Mountain of subtropical China.Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 33, 672-680.(in Chinese with English abstract) [简敏菲, 刘琪璟, 朱笃, 游海 (2009). 九连山常绿阔叶林乔木优势种群的种间关联性分析. 植物生态学报, 33, 672-680.] |
17 |
Keddy PA (1992). Assembly and response rules: Two goals for predictive community ecology.Journal of Vegetation Science, 3, 157-164.
DOI URL |
18 |
Lieberman M, Lieberman D (2007). Nearest-neighbor tree species combinations in tropical forest: The role of chance, and some consequences of high diversity.Oikos, 116, 377-386.
DOI URL |
19 | Pacala SW, Levin SA (1997). Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species. In: Tilman D, Kareiva PM eds. Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA. 204-232. |
20 |
Perry GL, Miller BP, Enright NJ, Lamont BB (2014). Stochastic geometry best explains spatial associations among species pairs and plant functional types in species-rich shrublands.Oikos, 123, 99-110.
DOI URL |
21 |
Queenborough SA, Burslem DF, Garwood NC, Valencia R (2007). Habitat niche partitioning by 16 species of Myristicaceae in Amazonian Ecuador.Plant Ecology, 192, 193-207.
DOI URL |
22 |
Schluter D (1984). A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications.Ecology, 65, 998-1005.
DOI URL |
23 |
Sfenthourakis S, Tzanatos E, Giokas S (2006). Species co- occurrence: The case of congeneric species and a causal approach to patterns of species association.Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 39-49.
DOI URL |
24 | S?rensen T (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons.Biologiske Skrifter, 5, 1-34. |
25 | The Editorial Committee of Vegetation of China (1980). Vegetation of China. Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese) [中国植被编辑委员会 (1980). 中国植被. 科学出版社, 北京.] |
26 |
Wiegand T, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N (2007). Species associations in a heterogeneous Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest.The American Naturalist, 170, E77-E95.
DOI URL |
27 |
Wiegand T, Huth A, Getzin S, Wang X, Hao Z, Gunatilleke CS, Gunatilleke IN (2012). Testing the independent species’ arrangement assertion made by theories of stochastic geometry of biodiversity.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 3312-3320.
DOI URL |
28 | Wiegand T, Moloney K (2004). Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology.Oikos, 104, 209-229. |
29 | Yan ER, Zhao CL, Hu JF (2018). Vegetation in Putuo Island—Type, Structure, Function and Management. Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese) [阎恩荣, 赵慈良, 胡军飞 (2018). 普陀山植被——类型、结构、功能、管护. 科学出版社, 北京.] |
30 | Yates F (1934). Contingency table involving small numbers and theχ2 test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1, 217-235. |
31 |
Yule GU (1912). On the methods of measuring association between two attributes.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 75, 579-652.
DOI URL |
32 | Zhang F, Shangguan TL (2000). Numerical analysis of interspecific relationships in anElaeagnus mollis community in Shanxi. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24, 351-355.(in Chinese with English abstract) [张峰, 上官铁梁 (2000). 山西翅果油树群落种间关系的数量分析. 植物生态学报, 24, 351-355.] |
33 | Zhang JL (2016). spaa: Species Association Analysis. R package version 0.2.2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spaa/index.html. Cited: 2016-06-09. |
34 |
Zhang JT, Jiao R (2003). Interspecific association between woody plants in Shenweigou of Guandi Mountains, Shanxi Province.Bulletin of Botanical Research, 23, 458-463.(in Chinese with English abstract) [张金屯, 焦蓉 (2003). 关帝山神尾沟森林群落木本植物种间联结性与相关性研究. 植物研究, 23, 458-463.]
DOI URL |
35 |
Zhou LL, Zhang QQ, Zhao YT, Xu MS, Cheng JY, Zhu DN, Song YJ, Huang HX, Shi QR, Yan ER (2015). Species association and correlation between vertical layers in Liquidambar formmosana community in Tiantong Region, Zhejiang Province. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 1136-1145.(in Chinese with English abstract) [周刘丽, 张晴晴, 赵延涛, 许洺山, 程浚洋, 朱丹妮, 宋彦君, 黄海侠, 史青茹, 阎恩荣 (2015). 浙江天童枫香树群落不同垂直层次物种间的联结性与相关性. 植物生态学报, 39, 1136-1145.]
DOI URL |
36 |
Zhou XY, Wang BX (2000). An analysis of interspecific associations in secondary succession forest communities in Heishiding Natural Reserve, Guangdong Province.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24, 332-339.(in Chinese with English abstract) [周先叶, 王伯荪 (2000). 广东黑石顶自然保护区森林次生演替过程中群落的种间联结性分析. 植物生态学报, 24, 332-339.]
DOI URL |
[1] | Yan YAN, Xin-Na ZHANG, Jie YAO, Chun-Yu ZHANG, Xiu-Hai ZHAO. Composition and temporal dynamics of tree seedlings at different successional stages of conifer and broad-leaved mixed forests in Jiaohe, Jilin Province, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(2): 127-139. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 6281
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 1723
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn