Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 655-664.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00061
• Research Articles • Next Articles
ZHANG Jian-Hong1, SHI Qing-Ru2,3, XU Ming-Shan2,3, ZHAO Yan-Tao2,3, ZHONG Qiang2,3, ZHANG Fu-Jie4, YAN En-Rong2,3,*()
Received:
2014-01-15
Accepted:
2014-05-09
Online:
2014-01-15
Published:
2014-07-10
Contact:
YAN En-Rong
ZHANG Jian-Hong, SHI Qing-Ru, XU Ming-Shan, ZHAO Yan-Tao, ZHONG Qiang, ZHANG Fu-Jie, YAN En-Rong. Testing of Corner’s rules across woody plants in Tiantong region, Zhejiang Province: effects of individual density[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(7): 655-664.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00061
Fig. 1 Regression relationships between total leaf area and twig cross-sectional area (A and B) and between branching intensity and twig cross-sectional area (C and D) at individual level. A and C are for all individuals, and B and D are for large-sized individuals only. ***, p < 0.001.
数据组 Data group | 密度区间 Density interval | 个体数 Individual number | 分组斜率(置信区间) Group slope (CI) | 截距 Intercept | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
枝横截面积-总叶面积 Twig cross-sectional area-total leaf area | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 933 | 1.24 (1.20-1.28)a* | 1.47b |
M (114-156) | 1 414 | 1.20 (1.17-1.23)a* | 1.53a | ||
H (156-198) | 709 | 1.18 (1.13-1.23)b* | 1.51a | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 178 | 1.13 (1.04-1.23)a* | 1.48b | |
H (15-24) | 142 | 1.08 (0.99-1.17)b | 1.54a | ||
枝横截面积-分梢密度 Twig cross-sectional area- branching intensity | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 933 | -1.45 (-1.48- -1.42)a* | 0.03a |
M (114-156) | 1 414 | -1.46 (-1.49- -1.44)b* | 0.03a | ||
H (156-198) | 709 | -1.46 (-1.50- -1.43)a* | 0.03a | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 178 | -1.42 (-1.50- -1.36)a* | 0.90a | |
H (15-24) | 142 | -1.46 (-1.53- -1.40)b* | 0.91a |
Table 1 Summary of regression parameters based on standardized major axis estimation for scaling relationships between total leaf area and twig cross-sectional area and between branching intensity and twig cross-sectional area for individual plants in communities differing in stem density
数据组 Data group | 密度区间 Density interval | 个体数 Individual number | 分组斜率(置信区间) Group slope (CI) | 截距 Intercept | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
枝横截面积-总叶面积 Twig cross-sectional area-total leaf area | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 933 | 1.24 (1.20-1.28)a* | 1.47b |
M (114-156) | 1 414 | 1.20 (1.17-1.23)a* | 1.53a | ||
H (156-198) | 709 | 1.18 (1.13-1.23)b* | 1.51a | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 178 | 1.13 (1.04-1.23)a* | 1.48b | |
H (15-24) | 142 | 1.08 (0.99-1.17)b | 1.54a | ||
枝横截面积-分梢密度 Twig cross-sectional area- branching intensity | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 933 | -1.45 (-1.48- -1.42)a* | 0.03a |
M (114-156) | 1 414 | -1.46 (-1.49- -1.44)b* | 0.03a | ||
H (156-198) | 709 | -1.46 (-1.50- -1.43)a* | 0.03a | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 178 | -1.42 (-1.50- -1.36)a* | 0.90a | |
H (15-24) | 142 | -1.46 (-1.53- -1.40)b* | 0.91a |
数据组 Data group | 密度区间 Density interval | 个体水平 Individual level | 物种水平 Species level | |
---|---|---|---|---|
总叶面积 Total leaf area (mm2) | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 84.79 ± 5.15a (L-M, 0.82) | 136.53 ± 39.62a (L-M, 0.63) |
M (114-156) | 88.29 ± 3.72a (M-H, 0.00) | 185.43 ± 43.01a (M-H, 0.65) | ||
H (156-198) | 68.20 ± 3.60b (L-H, 0.04) | 131.01 ± 28.60a (L-H, 1.00) | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 222.94 ± 23.32a (L-H, 0.28) | 243.55 ± 115.72a (L-H, 0.85) | |
H (15-24) | 185.86 ± 25.36a | 220.05 ± 66.08a | ||
枝截面积 Twig cross-sectional area (mm2) | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 2.21 ± 0.09a (L-M, 0.57) | 3.02 ± 0.39a (L-M, 0.59) |
M (114-156) | 2.10 ± 0.07a (M-H, 0.03) | 3.93 ± 0.93a (M-H, 0.75) | ||
H (156-198) | 1.79 ± 0.08b (L-H, 0.00) | 3.17 ± 0.56a (L-H, 0.99) | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 5.51 ± 0.36a (L-H, 0.07) | 4.23 ± 0.89a (L-H, 0.67) | |
H (15-24) | 4.39 ± 0.50a | 5.03 ± 1.49a | ||
分梢密度 Branching intensity (No.·mm-3) | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 0.88 ± 0.08a (L-M, 0.11) | 0.77 ± 0.14a (L-M, 1.00) |
M (114-156) | 0.74 ± 0.03a (M-H, 0.91) | 0.76 ± 0.14a (M-H, 0.87) | ||
H (156-198) | 0.78 ± 0.04a (L-H, 0.39) | 0.65 ± 0.14a (L-H, 0.83) | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 0.32 ± 0.06a (L-H, 0.24) | 0.75 ± 0.27a (L-H, 0.39) | |
H (15-24) | 0.41 ± 0.05a | 0.52 ± 0.10a |
Table 2 Twig and leaf traits for plants in communities differing in stem density (mean ± SE)
数据组 Data group | 密度区间 Density interval | 个体水平 Individual level | 物种水平 Species level | |
---|---|---|---|---|
总叶面积 Total leaf area (mm2) | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 84.79 ± 5.15a (L-M, 0.82) | 136.53 ± 39.62a (L-M, 0.63) |
M (114-156) | 88.29 ± 3.72a (M-H, 0.00) | 185.43 ± 43.01a (M-H, 0.65) | ||
H (156-198) | 68.20 ± 3.60b (L-H, 0.04) | 131.01 ± 28.60a (L-H, 1.00) | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 222.94 ± 23.32a (L-H, 0.28) | 243.55 ± 115.72a (L-H, 0.85) | |
H (15-24) | 185.86 ± 25.36a | 220.05 ± 66.08a | ||
枝截面积 Twig cross-sectional area (mm2) | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 2.21 ± 0.09a (L-M, 0.57) | 3.02 ± 0.39a (L-M, 0.59) |
M (114-156) | 2.10 ± 0.07a (M-H, 0.03) | 3.93 ± 0.93a (M-H, 0.75) | ||
H (156-198) | 1.79 ± 0.08b (L-H, 0.00) | 3.17 ± 0.56a (L-H, 0.99) | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 5.51 ± 0.36a (L-H, 0.07) | 4.23 ± 0.89a (L-H, 0.67) | |
H (15-24) | 4.39 ± 0.50a | 5.03 ± 1.49a | ||
分梢密度 Branching intensity (No.·mm-3) | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 0.88 ± 0.08a (L-M, 0.11) | 0.77 ± 0.14a (L-M, 1.00) |
M (114-156) | 0.74 ± 0.03a (M-H, 0.91) | 0.76 ± 0.14a (M-H, 0.87) | ||
H (156-198) | 0.78 ± 0.04a (L-H, 0.39) | 0.65 ± 0.14a (L-H, 0.83) | ||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 0.32 ± 0.06a (L-H, 0.24) | 0.75 ± 0.27a (L-H, 0.39) | |
H (15-24) | 0.41 ± 0.05a | 0.52 ± 0.10a |
数据组 Data group | 密度区间 Density interval | 物种数 Species number | 回归系数R2 Regression coefficient | 分组斜率(置信区间) Group slope (CIs) | 共斜率(置信区间) Common slope (CIs) | 截距 Intercept | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
枝截面积-总叶面积 Twig cross-sectional area-total leaf area | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 59 | 0.65*** | 1.10 (0.94-1.28)a | 1.01 (0.98-1.15) | 1.53a |
M (114-156) | 59 | 0.82*** | 1.05 (0.94-1.18)a | 1.61a | |||
H (156-198) | 37 | 0.76*** | 1.06 (0.90-1.26)a | 1.56a | |||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 28 | 0.77*** | 1.13 (0.94-1.38)a | 1.07 (0.96-1.20) | 1.54a | |
H (15-24) | 35 | 0.86*** | 1.04 (0.92-1.19) a | 1.57a | |||
枝截面积-分梢密度 Twig cross-sectional area-branching intensity | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 59 | 0.72*** | -1.78 (-2.04- -1.54)a* | -1.60 (-1.47- -1.73)§ | 0.12a |
M (114-156) | 59 | 0.78*** | -1.57 (-1.78- -1.38)a* | 0.04a | |||
H (156-198) | 37 | 0.80*** | -1.46 (-1.70- -1.26)a* | 0.03a | |||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 28 | 0.96*** | -1.28 (-1.39- -1.19)a* | -1.33 (-1.25- -1.4)§ | 0.16a | |
H (15-24) | 35 | 0.92*** | -1.42 (-1.58- -1.28)a* | 0.12a |
Table 3 Summary of regression parameters based on standardized major axis estimation for scaling relationships between total leaf area and twig cross-sectional area and between branching intensity and twig cross-sectional area for plants in communities differing in stem density at species level.
数据组 Data group | 密度区间 Density interval | 物种数 Species number | 回归系数R2 Regression coefficient | 分组斜率(置信区间) Group slope (CIs) | 共斜率(置信区间) Common slope (CIs) | 截距 Intercept | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
枝截面积-总叶面积 Twig cross-sectional area-total leaf area | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 59 | 0.65*** | 1.10 (0.94-1.28)a | 1.01 (0.98-1.15) | 1.53a |
M (114-156) | 59 | 0.82*** | 1.05 (0.94-1.18)a | 1.61a | |||
H (156-198) | 37 | 0.76*** | 1.06 (0.90-1.26)a | 1.56a | |||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 28 | 0.77*** | 1.13 (0.94-1.38)a | 1.07 (0.96-1.20) | 1.54a | |
H (15-24) | 35 | 0.86*** | 1.04 (0.92-1.19) a | 1.57a | |||
枝截面积-分梢密度 Twig cross-sectional area-branching intensity | 全部个体 All individuals | L (72-114) | 59 | 0.72*** | -1.78 (-2.04- -1.54)a* | -1.60 (-1.47- -1.73)§ | 0.12a |
M (114-156) | 59 | 0.78*** | -1.57 (-1.78- -1.38)a* | 0.04a | |||
H (156-198) | 37 | 0.80*** | -1.46 (-1.70- -1.26)a* | 0.03a | |||
大个体 Large-sized individuals | L (6-15) | 28 | 0.96*** | -1.28 (-1.39- -1.19)a* | -1.33 (-1.25- -1.4)§ | 0.16a | |
H (15-24) | 35 | 0.92*** | -1.42 (-1.58- -1.28)a* | 0.12a |
[1] |
Ackerly DD, Donoghue MJ (1998). Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner’s rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples ( Acer). The American Naturalist, 152, 767-791.
URL PMID |
[2] | Brouat C, Gibernau M, Amsellem L, McKey D (1998). Corner’s rules revisited: ontogenetic and interspecific patterns in leaf-stem allometry. New Phytologist, 139, 459-470. |
[3] | Corner E (1949). The durian theory or the origin of the modern tree. Annals of Botany, 13, 367-414. |
[4] |
Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2001). Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities. Nature, 410, 655-660.
URL PMID |
[5] |
Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2002). Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 295, 1517-1520.
DOI URL PMID |
[6] | Enquist BJ, West GB, Charnov EL, Brown JH (1999). Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature, 401, 907-911. |
[7] | Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ (2006). User’s guide to SMATR: Standardised Major Axis Tests & Routines Version 2. 0. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/. (7 April 2011, date last accessed). Cited 2014-01-13. |
[8] | Givnish TJ (1987). Comparative studies of leaf form: assessing the relative roles of selective pressures and phylogenetic constraints. New Phytologist, 106(Suppl.), 131-160. |
[9] | Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991). The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. |
[10] | Keddy P, Twolan-Strutt L, Shipley B (1997). Experimental evidence that interspecific competitive asymmetry increases with soil productivity. Oikos, 80, 253-256. |
[11] | Kleiman D, Aarssen LW (2007). The leaf size/number trade-off in trees. Journal of Ecology, 95, 376– 382. |
[12] |
Liao JX, Chen J, Jiang MX, Huang HD (2012). Leaf traits and persistence of relict and endangered tree species in a rare plant community. Functional Plant Biology, 39, 512-518.
URL PMID |
[13] | Liu ZG, Cai YL, Li K (2008). Studies on the leaf size-twig size spectrum of subtropical evergreen board-leaved woody species. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32, 363-369. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘志国, 蔡永立, 李恺 (2008). 亚热带常绿阔叶林植物叶-小枝的异速生长. 植物生态学报, 32, 363-369.] | |
[14] | Meziane D, Shipley B (1999a). Interacting determinants of specific leaf area in 22 herbaceous species: effects of irradiance and nutrient availability. Plant, Cell & Environment, 22, 447-459. |
[15] | Meziane D, Shipley B (1999b). Interacting components of interspecific relative growth rate: constancy and change under differing conditions of light and nutrient supply. Functional Ecology, 13, 611-622. |
[16] | Niklas KJ (1992). Plant Biomechanics: an Engineering Approach to Plant form and Function. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. |
[17] | Niklas KJ (1994). Plant Allometry: the Scaling of Form and Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. |
[18] | Normand F, Bissery C, Damour G, Lauri PÉ (2008). Hydraulic and mechanical stem properties affect leaf-stem allometry in mango cultivars. New Phytologist, 178, 590-602. |
[19] | Olson ME, Aguirre-Hernández R, Rosell JA (2009). Universal foliage-stem scaling across environments and species in dicot trees: plasticity, biomechanics and Corner’s rules. Ecology Letters, 12, 210-219. |
[20] | Pickup M, Westoby M, Basden A (2005). Dry mass costs of deploying leaf area in relation to leaf size. Functional Ecology, 19, 88-97. |
[21] | Pitman EJG (1939). A note on normal correlation. Biometrika, 31, 9-12. |
[22] | Preston KA, Ackerly DD (2003). Hydraulic architecture and the evolution of shoot allometry in contrasting climates. American Journal of Botany, 90, 1502-1512. |
[23] | Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11001-11006. |
[24] |
Reich PB, Uhl C, Walter MB, Ellsworth DS (1991). Leaf lifespan as a determinant of leaf structure and function among 23 Amazonian tree species. Oecologia, 86, 16-24.
URL PMID |
[25] | Reich PB, Walter MB, Ellsworth DS (1992). Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62, 365-392. |
[26] | Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964). A quantitative analysis of plant form—the pipe model theory. I. Basic analysis. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 14, 97-105. |
[27] | Song YC, Wang XR (1995). Vegetation and Flora of Tiantong National Forest Park Zhejiang Province. Shanghai Scientific and Technical Document Publishing House, Shanghai. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[宋永昌, 王祥荣 (1995). 浙江天童国家森林公园的植被和区系. 上海科学技术文献出版社, 上海.] | |
[28] | Sun SC, Jin DM, Shi PL (2006). The leaf size-twig size spectrum of temperate woody species along an altitudinal gradient: an invariant allometric scaling relationship. Annals of Botany, 97, 97-107. |
[29] |
Takenaka A (2000). Shoot growth responses to light microenvironment and correlative inhibition in tree seedlings under a forest canopy. Tree Physiology, 20, 987-991.
URL PMID |
[30] | Warton DI, Weber NC (2002). Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biometrical Journal, 44, 161-174. |
[31] | Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006). Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews, 81, 259-291. |
[32] | West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1997). A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science, 276, 122-126. |
[33] | Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002). Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 125-159. |
[34] | Westoby M, Wright IJ (2003). The leaf size-twig size spectrum and its relationship to other important spectra of variation among species. Oecologia, 135, 621-628. |
[35] | Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M (2001). Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology, 15, 423-434. |
[36] | Xu Y, Yang XD, Xie YM, Xu YL, Chang SX, Yan ER (2012). Twig size-number trade-off among woody plants in Tiantong region, Zhejiang Province of China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 1268-1276. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[许月, 杨晓东, 谢一鸣, 徐艺露, Chang SX, 阎恩荣 (2012). 浙江天童木本植物小枝的“大小-数量”权衡. 植物生态学报, 36, 1268-1276.] | |
[37] |
Yan ER, Wang XH, Chang SX, He FL (2013). Scaling relationships among twig size, leaf size and leafing intensity in a successional series of subtropical forests. Tree Physiology, 33, 609-617.
DOI URL PMID |
[38] |
Yang DM, Li GY, Sun SC (2008). The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species. Annals of Botany, 102, 623-629.
URL PMID |
[39] | Yang DM, Li GY, Sun SC (2009). The effects of leaf size, leaf habit, and leaf form on leaf/stem relationships in plant twigs of temperate woody species. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 359-366. |
[40] | Zimmermann MH (1983). Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap. Springer-Verlag, Berlin . |
[1] | Nan DONG, Ming-Ming TANG, Wen-Qian CUI, Meng-Yao YUE, Jie LIU, Yu-Jie HUANG. Growth of chestnut and tea seedlings under different root partitioning patterns [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(1): 62-73. |
[2] | XING Lei, DUAN Na, LI Qing-He, LIU Cheng-Gong, LI Hui-Qing, SUN Gao-Jie. Variation in biomass allocation of Nitraria tangutorum during different phenological phases [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(7): 763-771. |
[3] | CHEN Guo-Peng, YANG Ke-Tong, WANG Li, WANG Fei, CAO Xiu-Wen, CHEN Lin-Sheng. Allometric relations for biomass partitioning of seven alpine Rhododendron species in south of Gansu [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(10): 1040-1049. |
[4] | SHI Qing-Ru, XU Ming-Shan, ZHAO Yan-Tao, ZHOU Liu-Li, ZHANG Qing-Qing, MA Wen-Ji, ZHAO Qi, YAN En-Rong. Testing of corner’s rules across woody plants in Tiantong region, Zhejiang Province: effects of micro-topography [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(7): 665-674. |
[5] | WANG Yi-Kun, JIN Ai-Wu, ZHU Qiang-Gen, QIU Yong-Hua, JI Xin-Liang, ZHANG Si-Hai. Effects of fertilization on the relations of diameter at breast height between different-aged ramets of Phyllostachys edulis population [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(3): 289-297. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 3480
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 1786
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn