Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 424-430.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.021 cstr: 32100.14.j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.021
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUI Jun-Ai1,2, YE Qing-Sheng1,*(
)
Received:2006-07-24
Accepted:2006-10-30
Online:2008-07-24
Published:2008-03-30
Contact:
YE Qing-Sheng
HUI Jun-Ai, YE Qing-Sheng. EFFECTS OF ELEVATED CO2 CONCENTRATION ON PHOTOSYNTHSIS, GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE BROMELIAD GUZMANIA[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(2): 424-430.
Fig.1 Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and water use efficiency (WUE) of leaves in Guzmania 'Denise' The capital and small letters stand for the diversity at 0.01 and 0.05 significance level, no letters means the diversity no significance CK: Ambient CO2 concentration (360±30) μmol·mol-1 T1: CO2 concentration (600±100) μmol·mol-1 T2: CO2 concentration (900±100) μmol·mol-1
Fig.2 Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and water use efficiency (WUE) of leaves in Guzmania 'Cherry' Note see Fig. 1
| 时间 Time(d) | 处理 | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (mg·g-1 DW) | 淀粉 Starch (mg·g-1 FW) | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a+b(mg·g-1 FW) | a/b | |||||
丹尼斯凤梨 Guzmania 'Denise' | 0 | CK | 7.27±0.32 | 8.12±0.25 | 1.60±0.18 | 2.31±0.21 |
| 10 | CK | 7.75±0.84 | 8.20±0.87 | 1.55±0.24 | 2.23±0.17 | |
| T1 | 8.53±0.32 | 8.95±1.45 | 1.72±0.17 | 2.40±0.22 | ||
| T2 | 9.15±1.20 | 9.49±1.58 | 1.79±0.32 | 2.41±0.25 | ||
| 20 | CK | 8.35±0.95b | 7.63±1.24c | 1.22±0.29 | 2.11±0.12 | |
| T1 | 9.17±0.75b | 9.78±2.06b | 1.47±0.27 | 2.33±0.31 | ||
| T2 | 11.35±1.23a | 11.26±3.71a | 1.60±0.18 | 2.34±0.18 | ||
| 30 | CK | 10.12±0.85b | 8.85±0.95 | 1.21±0.17 | 2.29±0.18 | |
| T1 | 11.42±0.52a | 9.75±1.32 | 1.13±0.19 | 2.06±0.12 | ||
| T2 | 13.11±1.45a | 10.43±1.75 | 1.11±0.21 | 2.13±0.31 | ||
吉利凤梨 Guzmania 'Cherry' | 0 | CK | 8.15±0.32 | 7.85±0.25 | 2.40±0.22 | 2.30±0.33 |
| 10 | CK | 9.75±0.60 | 8.13±0.93 | 2.39±0.31 | 2.21±0.18 | |
| T1 | 10.47±0.52 | 8.65±0.52 | 1.72±0.16 | 2.04±0.14 | ||
| T2 | 11.65±0.93 | 9.35±0.71 | 1.58±0.21 | 2.05±0.17 | ||
| 20 | CK | 10.35±0.42b | 8.35±0.31b | 1.56±0.15 | 2.35±0.18 | |
| T1 | 11.75±0.20a | 9.65±0.52a | 1.57±0.24 | 2.14±0.12 | ||
| T2 | 12.66±0.62a | 10.25±0.75a | 1.47±0.17 | 2.06±0.11 | ||
| 30 | CK | 11.31±0.60b | 8.52±0.93b | 1.39±0.31 | 2.20±0.16 | |
| T1 | 13.12±0.52a | 10.12±0.52a | 1.36±0.24 | 2.35±0.11 | ||
| T2 | 14.95±0.93a | 11.35±0.71a | 1.30±0.15 | 2.14±0.31 | ||
Table 1 Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on the content of soluble sugar, starch and chlorophyll (Mean±SE)
| 时间 Time(d) | 处理 | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (mg·g-1 DW) | 淀粉 Starch (mg·g-1 FW) | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a+b(mg·g-1 FW) | a/b | |||||
丹尼斯凤梨 Guzmania 'Denise' | 0 | CK | 7.27±0.32 | 8.12±0.25 | 1.60±0.18 | 2.31±0.21 |
| 10 | CK | 7.75±0.84 | 8.20±0.87 | 1.55±0.24 | 2.23±0.17 | |
| T1 | 8.53±0.32 | 8.95±1.45 | 1.72±0.17 | 2.40±0.22 | ||
| T2 | 9.15±1.20 | 9.49±1.58 | 1.79±0.32 | 2.41±0.25 | ||
| 20 | CK | 8.35±0.95b | 7.63±1.24c | 1.22±0.29 | 2.11±0.12 | |
| T1 | 9.17±0.75b | 9.78±2.06b | 1.47±0.27 | 2.33±0.31 | ||
| T2 | 11.35±1.23a | 11.26±3.71a | 1.60±0.18 | 2.34±0.18 | ||
| 30 | CK | 10.12±0.85b | 8.85±0.95 | 1.21±0.17 | 2.29±0.18 | |
| T1 | 11.42±0.52a | 9.75±1.32 | 1.13±0.19 | 2.06±0.12 | ||
| T2 | 13.11±1.45a | 10.43±1.75 | 1.11±0.21 | 2.13±0.31 | ||
吉利凤梨 Guzmania 'Cherry' | 0 | CK | 8.15±0.32 | 7.85±0.25 | 2.40±0.22 | 2.30±0.33 |
| 10 | CK | 9.75±0.60 | 8.13±0.93 | 2.39±0.31 | 2.21±0.18 | |
| T1 | 10.47±0.52 | 8.65±0.52 | 1.72±0.16 | 2.04±0.14 | ||
| T2 | 11.65±0.93 | 9.35±0.71 | 1.58±0.21 | 2.05±0.17 | ||
| 20 | CK | 10.35±0.42b | 8.35±0.31b | 1.56±0.15 | 2.35±0.18 | |
| T1 | 11.75±0.20a | 9.65±0.52a | 1.57±0.24 | 2.14±0.12 | ||
| T2 | 12.66±0.62a | 10.25±0.75a | 1.47±0.17 | 2.06±0.11 | ||
| 30 | CK | 11.31±0.60b | 8.52±0.93b | 1.39±0.31 | 2.20±0.16 | |
| T1 | 13.12±0.52a | 10.12±0.52a | 1.36±0.24 | 2.35±0.11 | ||
| T2 | 14.95±0.93a | 11.35±0.71a | 1.30±0.15 | 2.14±0.31 | ||
| 时间 Time(d) | CO2 | 核酮糖1,5二磷酸羧化酶活性 Rubisco activity (CO2 nmol·mg-1 protein·min-1) | 乙醇酸氧化酶活性 Glycolate oxidase activity (Glyoxylate μmol·mg-1 protein·min-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
丹尼斯凤梨 Guzmania 'Denise' | 0 | CK | 11.86±0.72 | 20.07±2.35 |
| 10 | CK | 12.15±0.84 | 20.12±2.05a | |
| T1 | 12.41±0.56 | 18.65±1.21b | ||
| T2 | 12.64±1.34 | 17.82±1.34b | ||
| 20 | CK | 12.37±0.97b | 20.95±2.24a | |
| T1 | 12.72±0.85b | 17.12±1.76b | ||
| T2 | 13.87±0.74a | 16.95±1.43b | ||
| 30 | CK | 12.48±0.85b | 21.08±1.95a | |
| T1 | 13.56±0.78b | 16.66±1.32b | ||
| T2 | 14.75±1.25a | 15.46±1.25b | ||
吉利凤梨 Guzmania 'Cherry' | 0 | CK | 14.86±1.12 | 22.07±2.75 |
| 10 | CK | 15.02±1.45 | 22.38±1.93 | |
| T1 | 15.26±1.34 | 21.35±1.55 | ||
| T2 | 15.61±0.94 | 20.75±1.85 | ||
| 20 | CK | 15.32±0.42b | 22.75±2.52a | |
| T1 | 15.75±0.63b | 20.16±1.52b | ||
| T2 | 16.55±0.75a | 19.45±1.15b | ||
| 30 | CK | 15.48±0.45b | 23.08±2.93a | |
| T1 | 16.56±1.15b | 18.66±1.35b | ||
| T2 | 17.75±1.47a | 17.46±0.75b |
Table 2 Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on activities of Rubisco and glycolate oxidase in leaves (Mean±SE)
| 时间 Time(d) | CO2 | 核酮糖1,5二磷酸羧化酶活性 Rubisco activity (CO2 nmol·mg-1 protein·min-1) | 乙醇酸氧化酶活性 Glycolate oxidase activity (Glyoxylate μmol·mg-1 protein·min-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
丹尼斯凤梨 Guzmania 'Denise' | 0 | CK | 11.86±0.72 | 20.07±2.35 |
| 10 | CK | 12.15±0.84 | 20.12±2.05a | |
| T1 | 12.41±0.56 | 18.65±1.21b | ||
| T2 | 12.64±1.34 | 17.82±1.34b | ||
| 20 | CK | 12.37±0.97b | 20.95±2.24a | |
| T1 | 12.72±0.85b | 17.12±1.76b | ||
| T2 | 13.87±0.74a | 16.95±1.43b | ||
| 30 | CK | 12.48±0.85b | 21.08±1.95a | |
| T1 | 13.56±0.78b | 16.66±1.32b | ||
| T2 | 14.75±1.25a | 15.46±1.25b | ||
吉利凤梨 Guzmania 'Cherry' | 0 | CK | 14.86±1.12 | 22.07±2.75 |
| 10 | CK | 15.02±1.45 | 22.38±1.93 | |
| T1 | 15.26±1.34 | 21.35±1.55 | ||
| T2 | 15.61±0.94 | 20.75±1.85 | ||
| 20 | CK | 15.32±0.42b | 22.75±2.52a | |
| T1 | 15.75±0.63b | 20.16±1.52b | ||
| T2 | 16.55±0.75a | 19.45±1.15b | ||
| 30 | CK | 15.48±0.45b | 23.08±2.93a | |
| T1 | 16.56±1.15b | 18.66±1.35b | ||
| T2 | 17.75±1.47a | 17.46±0.75b |
| 时间 Time(d) | 处理 Treatment | 丹尼斯凤梨 Guzmania 'Denise' | 吉利凤梨Guzmania 'Cherry' | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 Plant height (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 开花率 Flowering rate(%) | |||
| 0 | CK | 24.56±0.46 | 96.25±4.52 | 23.40±0.60 | 92.23±1.56 | 0 | |
| 10 | CK | 25.42±1.35 | 97.39±6.65 | 24.12±0.44 | 94.75±1.35 | 0 | |
| T1 | 27.65±1.62 | 99.01± 6.55 | 27.65±0.72 | 99.45±1.65 | 0 | ||
| T2 | 30.72±1.65 | 102.08±8.25 | 28.05±0.60 | 101.25±2.25 | 0 | ||
| 20 | CK | 27.82±2.45 | 98.83±5.35 | 25.75±1.15b | 96.35±2.15c | 0 | |
| T1 | 29.75±2.32 | 101.67±8.35 | 27.75±0.86a | 103.15±2.16b | 0 | ||
| T2 | 32.63±1.67 | 104.98±10.85 | 28.25±0.75a | 107.55±1.03a | 0 | ||
| 30 | CK | 28.34±0.45b | 99.25±4.55b | 26.45±0.72b | 98.85±2.65b | 0C | |
| T1 | 31.45±0.87a | 103.53±6.35ab | 28.86±0.44a | 102.25±2.86ab | 10B | ||
| T2 | 33.26±1.32a | 106.75±10.75a | 30.33±0.60a | 105.35±2.66a | 20A | ||
Table 3 Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on growth and development of Guzmania 'Denise' and Guzmania 'Cherry' (Mean±SE)
| 时间 Time(d) | 处理 Treatment | 丹尼斯凤梨 Guzmania 'Denise' | 吉利凤梨Guzmania 'Cherry' | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 Plant height (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 开花率 Flowering rate(%) | |||
| 0 | CK | 24.56±0.46 | 96.25±4.52 | 23.40±0.60 | 92.23±1.56 | 0 | |
| 10 | CK | 25.42±1.35 | 97.39±6.65 | 24.12±0.44 | 94.75±1.35 | 0 | |
| T1 | 27.65±1.62 | 99.01± 6.55 | 27.65±0.72 | 99.45±1.65 | 0 | ||
| T2 | 30.72±1.65 | 102.08±8.25 | 28.05±0.60 | 101.25±2.25 | 0 | ||
| 20 | CK | 27.82±2.45 | 98.83±5.35 | 25.75±1.15b | 96.35±2.15c | 0 | |
| T1 | 29.75±2.32 | 101.67±8.35 | 27.75±0.86a | 103.15±2.16b | 0 | ||
| T2 | 32.63±1.67 | 104.98±10.85 | 28.25±0.75a | 107.55±1.03a | 0 | ||
| 30 | CK | 28.34±0.45b | 99.25±4.55b | 26.45±0.72b | 98.85±2.65b | 0C | |
| T1 | 31.45±0.87a | 103.53±6.35ab | 28.86±0.44a | 102.25±2.86ab | 10B | ||
| T2 | 33.26±1.32a | 106.75±10.75a | 30.33±0.60a | 105.35±2.66a | 20A | ||
| 时间 Time (d) | 处理 Treatment | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g) | 干重 Dry weight (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丹尼斯凤梨Guzmania‘Denise’ | 0 | CK | 96.31±7.65 | 15.61±0.65 |
| 30 | CK | 127.39±11.41c | 21.42±1.35c | |
| T1 | 148.37±18.48b | 24.27±1.77b | ||
| T2 | 165.23±16.68a | 27.37±1.41a | ||
| 吉利凤梨Guzmania‘Cherry’ | 0 | CK | 142.75±6.52 | 25.65±7.43 |
| 30 | CK | 175.38±10.41c | 30.12±6.21B | |
| T1 | 204.45±15.61b | 32.97±6.41B | ||
| T2 | 228.75±16.38a | 38.75±8.77A |
Table 4 Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on fresh weight and dry weight of Guzmania 'Denise' and Guzmania 'Cherry' (Mean±SE)
| 时间 Time (d) | 处理 Treatment | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g) | 干重 Dry weight (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丹尼斯凤梨Guzmania‘Denise’ | 0 | CK | 96.31±7.65 | 15.61±0.65 |
| 30 | CK | 127.39±11.41c | 21.42±1.35c | |
| T1 | 148.37±18.48b | 24.27±1.77b | ||
| T2 | 165.23±16.68a | 27.37±1.41a | ||
| 吉利凤梨Guzmania‘Cherry’ | 0 | CK | 142.75±6.52 | 25.65±7.43 |
| 30 | CK | 175.38±10.41c | 30.12±6.21B | |
| T1 | 204.45±15.61b | 32.97±6.41B | ||
| T2 | 228.75±16.38a | 38.75±8.77A |
| [1] |
Delucia EH, Sasek TW, Strain BR (1985). Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Photosynthesis Research, 7, 175-184.
DOI URL PMID |
| [2] | Geng XH (耿显华), Yu D (于丹), Huang YM (黄永明), Xie YH (谢永宏), Yang YQ (杨永清) (2004). Growth and physio-biochemistry responses of Vallisneria spiraslis L. to CO2 enrichment. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica (水生生物学报). 28, 304-309. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [3] |
Genthon G, Barnola JM, Raynaud D, Lorius C, Jouzel J, Barkov NI, Korotkevich YS, Kotlyakov VM (1987). Vostok ice core: climate response to CO2 and orbital forcing changes over the last climatic cycle. Nature, 329, 414-418.
DOI URL |
| [4] | Jiang GM (蒋高明), Han XG (韩兴国), Lin GH (林光辉) (1997). Response of plant growth to elevated [CO2]: a review on the chief methods and basic conclusions based on experiments in the external countries in past decade. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 21, 489-502. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [5] | Jiang YL (蒋跃林), Zhang QG (张庆国), Yang SY (杨书运), Zhang SD (张仕定), Wu J (吴健) (2006). Ecophysiological responses of 28 species of garden plants to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment (植物资源与环境学报), 15(2), 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [6] | Li YH (李永华), Liu LN (刘丽娜), Ye QS (叶庆生) (2005). Effects of elevated CO2 on the growth and photosynthesis of Anthurium andraeanum. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany (热带亚热带植物学报), 13, 343-346. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [7] | Lin FP (林丰平), Chen ZH (陈章和), Chen ZP (陈兆平), Zhang DM (张德明) (1999). Physiological and biochemical responses of the seedlings of four legume tree species to high CO2 concentration. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23, 220-227. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [8] | Lin WH (林伟宏) (1998). Response of photosynthesis to elevated atmospheric CO2. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 18, 529-538. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [9] | Liu JX (刘金祥), Li ZF (李志芳) (2005). Effects of CO2 concentrations increasing on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Wedelia trlobata. Guihaia (广西植物), 25, 477-480. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [10] | Liu JX (刘金祥), Mai JL (麦嘉玲), Liu JQ (刘家琼) (2004). Influence of different CO2 concentrations on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Ophiopogon japonicus. Grassland of China (中国草地), 26, 13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [11] |
Moore BD, Cheng SH, Sims D, Seemann JR (1999). The biochemical and molecular basis for photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22, 567-582.
DOI URL |
| [12] | Pan HT (潘会堂), Liu XL (刘秀丽), Zhang QX (张启翔) (2003). Influences of CO2 enrichment on ornamental plant production. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 25(1), 93-99. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [13] | Socias FX, Medrano H, Sharkey TD (1993). Feed back limitation of photosynthesis of Phaseolus vulgaris L. grow in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment, 16, 81-86. |
| [14] | Strain BR (1987). Direct effects of increasing CO2 on plant and ecosystem. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2, 18-21. |
| [15] | Su PX (苏培玺), Du MW (杜明武), Zhang LX (张立新), Bi YR (毕玉蓉), Zhao AF (赵爱芬), Liu XM (刘新民) (2002). Changes of photosynthetic characteristics and response to rising CO2 concentration in strawberry in solar greenhouse. Acta Horticulturae Sinica (园艺学报), 29, 423-426. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [16] | Sun J, Gibson KM, Kiirats O, Okita TW, Edwards GE (2002). Interactions of nitrate and CO2 enrichment on growth, carbohydrates, and rubisco in Arabidopsis starch mutants. Significance of starch and hexose. Plant Physiology, 130, 1573-1583. |
| [17] | Wang JM (王精明), Li YH (李永华), Huang SQ (黄胜琴), Liu LN (刘丽娜), Ye QS (叶庆生) (2005). Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on photosynthetic rate, growth and development in Anthurium andraeanum Lind leaves. Acta Horticulturae Sinica (园艺学报), 32, 335-338. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [18] | Wei SL (魏胜林), Liu YH (刘业好), Qu HY (屈海泳), Fu SL (傅松玲), Fu YL (傅玉兰) (2001). Effects of high CO2 concentration on physiological and biochemical processes in Lilly (Lilium dauricum). Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25, 410-413. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [19] | Xu CJ (徐昌杰), Chen WJ (陈文峻), Chen KS (陈昆松), Zhang SL (张上隆) (1998). A simple method for determining the content of starch-iodine colorimety. Biotechnology (生物技术), 8(2), 41-43. (in Chinese) |
| [20] | Ye QS (叶庆生), Pan RC (潘瑞炽), Qiu CX (丘才新) (1993). Study on the photosynthetic pathway of Cymbidium sinense. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 35, 441-446. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [21] | Zhang ZL (张志良), Qu WJ (瞿伟菁) (2003). Experimental Guide of Plant Physiology (植物生理学实验指导) 3rd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing, 88-92-169-170. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | WANG Wang-Lin Xu Lin Xu, QIAN Ni-Peng, Li Gang-Dun, LIU Qi-Jing. Seasonal dynamics of radial growth and its responses to non-structural carbohydrates in Pinus koraiensis and Quercus mongolica [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(预发表): 1-. |
| [2] | HU Guang-Ming, OU Xu, LONG Wen-Xing. Effects of host bark roughness on vascular epiphytic diversity and spore colonization in a tropical cloud forest(Re-submit after revision) [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(预发表): 1-. |
| [3] | Lin Lin-Lin, Xiao Jin-Xiang, Huang Shen-Shen, Zhao Yang-Mei, Zhang De-Xu, Cheng Yi-Kang, Long Wen-Xing. Effects of phosphorus addition on functional traits across seedlings and saplings in a tropical cloud forest [J]. , 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [4] | ZHANG Cheng-Hang, WEI Xing, WU Chun-Ze, WANG Yu-Yao, LI Hao-Nan. Growth response of mycorrhizal Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii seedlings to dry and wet deposition of atmospheric reduced nitrogen [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(3): 649-659. |
| [5] | REN Xi-Tong, LI Ying, ZHANG Yu, XIONG Hu-An-He, ZHANG Rui-Ke, QI Shan-Shan, DAI Zhi-Cong, DU Dao-Lin. Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and litter contributes to responses of Solidago canadensis to nutrient stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(3): 710-721. |
| [6] | JIANG Qing-Hong, DING Lu, WANG Zhe, ZHENG Chun-Li, FENG Zhao-Chuo. Growth-promoting effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi combined with different functional bacteria on Medicago sativa [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(3): 774-788. |
| [7] | LI Xin-Mao, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li. Seasonal dynamics and organ differences in growth and defense strategies of “twig system” of Corylus mandshurica [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 293-305. |
| [8] | JIA Hui-Li, WANG Rui, CHANG Yu-Liang, LIN Mao, LI Guo-Liang, WU Shuai-Kai, SU Yuan, DONG Kuan-Hu, $\boxed{\hbox{WANG Chang-Hui}}$. Stoichiometric characteristics of Leymus secalinus under different levels of nitrogen addition and its effects on photosynthesis [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 429-441. |
| [9] | LIANG Tian-Hao, WU Fan, HUANG Jin-Xue, JING Chen-Hong, FU He-Jing, YANG Zhi-Jie, XIONG De-Cheng. Effects of soil warming on fine root growth and morphology of Castanopsis kawakamii in mid-subtropical forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(1): 94-106. |
| [10] | LI Gang-Dun, QIAN Ni-Peng, WANG Lin-Xu, DONG Chun-Chao, LIU Qi-Jing. Seasonal dynamics of radial growth of Pinus koraiensis and Ulmus davidiana var. japonica are related to environmental factors in Changbai Mountain, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(7): 1110-1118. |
| [11] | PING Xiao-Yan, DU Yi-Qian, LAI Shi-Rong, KONG Meng-Qiao, YU Guo-Jie. Research progress of plant chemical defense strategies in response to herbivory [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(5): 667-680. |
| [12] | OUYANG Zi-Long, JIA Xiang-Lu, SHI Jing-Zhong, TENG Wei-Chao, LIU Xiu. Effects of growth regulators on photosynthetic characteristics of Rhizophora stylosa seedlings under low temperature stress and re-warming [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(4): 638-652. |
| [13] | LI Xin-Yi, ZHANG Li-Fang, WU You-Gui, GUO Jing, LAN Rong-Guang, LÜ Hong-Fei, YU Ming-Jian. Growth characteristics of Abies beshanzuensis seedlings at different altitudes and the influencing factors [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(4): 610-623. |
| [14] | LI Lin, HUANG Jia-Fang, DING Zhong-Hao, GUO Ping-Ping, CAI Yuan-Bin, LI Shi-Hua, LI Yun-Qin, LUO Min. Impact of increased inundation height on the net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a Cyperus malaccensis tidal marsh [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(4): 526-539. |
| [15] | TIAN Ao, LI Wei-Jie, CAO Yang, JIA Zhen-Zhen, ZENG Song. Growth response of Rhododendron delavayi seedlings to the soil water stress and its physiological mechanism [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(3): 488-501. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn