Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 779-788.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00779
Previous Articles Next Articles
MENG Peng1,2, LI Yu-Ling1,*(), YOU Guo-Chun2, ZHANG Shuo2
Published:
2011-08-18
Contact:
LI Yu-Ling
MENG Peng, LI Yu-Ling, YOU Guo-Chun, ZHANG Shuo. Effects of microenvironmental factors on rooting of Juniperus scopulorum cuttings[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(7): 779-788.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00779
基质种类 Media type | 处理 Treatment | 愈伤率 Callus percentage (%) | 生根率 Rooting percentage (%) | 炼存率 Survival rate after training (%) | 根系效果指数 Root effect index | 离散度指数 Rooting dispersion index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
河沙 River sand | 密插 Dense cutting | 96.1a | 75.6a | 75.0a | 9.002 4a | 0.858a |
稀插 Thin cutting | 91.2a | 53.6b | 49.8b | 5.788 8b | 1.266b | |
草炭 Peat | 密插 Dense cutting | 95.3a | 73.3a | 72.1a | 8.994 3a | 0.820a |
稀插 Thin cutting | 90.1a | 55.7b | 54.0b | 5.846 2b | 1.105b |
Table 1 Callus percentage, rooting percentage, survival rate after training, root effect index and rooting dispersion index of Juniperus scopulorum cuttings in two densities
基质种类 Media type | 处理 Treatment | 愈伤率 Callus percentage (%) | 生根率 Rooting percentage (%) | 炼存率 Survival rate after training (%) | 根系效果指数 Root effect index | 离散度指数 Rooting dispersion index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
河沙 River sand | 密插 Dense cutting | 96.1a | 75.6a | 75.0a | 9.002 4a | 0.858a |
稀插 Thin cutting | 91.2a | 53.6b | 49.8b | 5.788 8b | 1.266b | |
草炭 Peat | 密插 Dense cutting | 95.3a | 73.3a | 72.1a | 8.994 3a | 0.820a |
稀插 Thin cutting | 90.1a | 55.7b | 54.0b | 5.846 2b | 1.105b |
亚区编号 Serial number of subarea | 密插 Dense cutting | 稀插 Thin cutting | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
回归方程 Regression equation | 分形维数 Fractal dimension | 回归方程 Regression equation | 分形维数 Fractal dimension | ||
1 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 590.1)1.5989 | 1.598 9 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 800.5)1.1038 | 1.103 8 | |
2 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 790.1)1.5534 | 1.553 4 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 800.5)1.1238 | 1.123 8 | |
3 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 385.9)1.6469 | 1.646 9 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 865.3)1.1151 | 1.115 1 | |
4 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 350.0)1.7308 | 1.730 8 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 865.3)1.1154 | 1.115 4 | |
5 | d = 0.00005 (Lp + 205.1)1.7010 | 1.701 0 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 1196.2)1.0754 | 1.075 4 | |
6 | d = 0.00004 (Lp + 605.4)1.6238 | 1.623 8 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 523.4)1.5423 | 1.542 3 | |
7 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 405.4)1.7135 | 1.713 5 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 654.8)1.5211 | 1.521 1 | |
8 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 405.4)1.6393 | 1.639 3 | d = 0.00012 (Lp + 1539.8)1.2412 | 1.241 2 | |
9 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 234.4)1.7011 | 1.701 1 | d = 0.00004 (Lp + 283.2)1.7512 | 1.751 2 | |
10 | d = 0.00005 (Lp + 359.8)1.6548 | 1.654 8 | d = 0.00010 (Lp + 100.5)1.7358 | 1.735 8 | |
平均值 Mean | 1.656 4a | 1.332 5b |
Table 2 Comparison of rooting fractal feature of Juniperus scopulorum cuttings in two densities
亚区编号 Serial number of subarea | 密插 Dense cutting | 稀插 Thin cutting | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
回归方程 Regression equation | 分形维数 Fractal dimension | 回归方程 Regression equation | 分形维数 Fractal dimension | ||
1 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 590.1)1.5989 | 1.598 9 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 800.5)1.1038 | 1.103 8 | |
2 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 790.1)1.5534 | 1.553 4 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 800.5)1.1238 | 1.123 8 | |
3 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 385.9)1.6469 | 1.646 9 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 865.3)1.1151 | 1.115 1 | |
4 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 350.0)1.7308 | 1.730 8 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 865.3)1.1154 | 1.115 4 | |
5 | d = 0.00005 (Lp + 205.1)1.7010 | 1.701 0 | d = 0.00055 (Lp + 1196.2)1.0754 | 1.075 4 | |
6 | d = 0.00004 (Lp + 605.4)1.6238 | 1.623 8 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 523.4)1.5423 | 1.542 3 | |
7 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 405.4)1.7135 | 1.713 5 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 654.8)1.5211 | 1.521 1 | |
8 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 405.4)1.6393 | 1.639 3 | d = 0.00012 (Lp + 1539.8)1.2412 | 1.241 2 | |
9 | d = 0.00003 (Lp + 234.4)1.7011 | 1.701 1 | d = 0.00004 (Lp + 283.2)1.7512 | 1.751 2 | |
10 | d = 0.00005 (Lp + 359.8)1.6548 | 1.654 8 | d = 0.00010 (Lp + 100.5)1.7358 | 1.735 8 | |
平均值 Mean | 1.656 4a | 1.332 5b |
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | F值 F value | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6月16日-7月15日 June 16 to July 15 (n = 30) | 7月16日-8月15日 July 16 to Aug. 15 (n = 31) | 8月16日-9月15日 Aug. 16 to Sept. 15 (n = 31) | |||||||||||
08:00 | 12:00 | 16:00 | 08:00 | 12:00 | 16:00 | 08:00 | 12:00 | 16:00 | |||||
基质 Media | 密插 Dense cutting | 1 | 1.356 4 | 3.754 7 | 2.245 6 | 1.668 7 | 1.678 9 | 1.100 0 | 1.161 2 | 2.957 4 | 2.754 7 | ||
稀插 Thin cutting | 1 | 1.385 2 | 4.838 0* | 2.483 3 | 1.968 3 | 2.007 9 | 1.100 1 | 1.194 0 | 4.073 8* | 3.398 8 |
Table 4 Variance analysis on microenvironmental relative humidity of Juniperus scopulorum cuttings in different media
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | F值 F value | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6月16日-7月15日 June 16 to July 15 (n = 30) | 7月16日-8月15日 July 16 to Aug. 15 (n = 31) | 8月16日-9月15日 Aug. 16 to Sept. 15 (n = 31) | |||||||||||
08:00 | 12:00 | 16:00 | 08:00 | 12:00 | 16:00 | 08:00 | 12:00 | 16:00 | |||||
基质 Media | 密插 Dense cutting | 1 | 1.356 4 | 3.754 7 | 2.245 6 | 1.668 7 | 1.678 9 | 1.100 0 | 1.161 2 | 2.957 4 | 2.754 7 | ||
稀插 Thin cutting | 1 | 1.385 2 | 4.838 0* | 2.483 3 | 1.968 3 | 2.007 9 | 1.100 1 | 1.194 0 | 4.073 8* | 3.398 8 |
[1] | Baadsmand S, Andersen AS (1984). Transport and accumulation of indole-3-acetic acid in pea cuttings under two levels of irradiance. Physiologia Plantarum, 61, 107-113. |
[2] | Barazi ZA, Schwabe WW (1982). Rooting softwood cutting of adult Pistacia vera. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 2, 247-252. |
[3] | Barbour JR, Carvaiho JPF, Usda FS (2009). Response of Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum) seeds to seed conditioning and germination treatments. Seed Technology, 31, 43-54. |
[4] | Bilderback TE, Lorscheider MR (1995). Physical properties of double-processed pine bark: effects on rooting. Acta Horticulturae, 401, 77-83. |
[5] | Boeijink DE, van Broekhuizen JTM (1973). Rooting of cuttings of Pinus sylvestris under mist. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 4, 127-132. |
[6] |
Brinker M, van Zyl L, Liu WB, Craig D, Sederoff RR, Clapham DH, von Arnold S (2004). Microarray analyses of gene expression during adventitious root development in Pinus contorta. Plant Physiology, 135, 1526-1539.
DOI URL PMID |
[7] | Cheng GY (程广有), Tang XJ (唐晓杰), Shen XH (沈熙环) (2003). Variance of rooting ability of cuttings from natural population of Taxus cuspidata and cutting technique. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 31(6), 23-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | de Klerk GJ, van der Krieken W, de Jong JC (1999). Review the formation of adventitious roots: new concepts, new possibilities. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant, 35, 189-199. |
[9] | Eliasson L, Brunes L (1980). Light effects on root formation in aspen and willow cuttings. Physiologia Plantarum, 43, 13-18. |
[10] | Gay AP, Loach K (1977). Leaf conductance changes on leafy cuttings of Cornus and Rhododendron during propagation. Journal of Horticultural Science, 52, 509-516. |
[11] | Gong CM (龚春梅), Ning PB (宁蓬勃), Wang GX (王根轩), Liang ZS (梁宗锁) (2009). A review of adaptable varia- tions and evolution of photosynthetic carbon assimilating pathway in C3 and C4 plants. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 33, 206-221. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Grange RI, Loach K (1983). Environmental factors affecting water loss from leafy cuttings in different propagation systems. Journal of Horticultural Science, 58, 1-7. |
[13] | Grange RI, Loach K (1985). The effect of light on the rooting of leafy cuttings. Scientia Horticulturae, 27, 105-111. |
[14] | Greenwood MS, Marino TM, Meier RD, Shahan KW (1980). The role of mist and chemical treatments in rooting loblolly and shortleaf pine cuttings. Forest Science, 26, 651-655. |
[15] | Haissig BE (1984). Carbohydrate accumulation and partitioning in Pinus banksiana seedlings and seedling cuttings. Physiologia Plantarum, 61, 13-19. |
[16] | Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies FTJ, Geneve RL (1983). Plant Propagation Principles and Practices. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 302-303. |
[17] | Ji KS (季孔庶), Wang ZR (王章荣), Chen TH (陈天华), Wang MX (王明庥) (1998). A study on rooting ability variation of masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) cuttings. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (南京林业大学学报), 22(3), 66-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] |
Laukkanen H, Rautiainen L, Taulavuori E, Hohtola A (1999). Changes in cellular structures and enzymatic activities during browning of Scots pine callus derived from mature buds. Tree Physiology, 20, 467-475.
DOI URL PMID |
[19] |
Lebude AV, Goldfarb B, Blazich FA, Wise FC, Frampton J (2004). Mist, substrate water potential and cutting water potential influence rooting of stem cuttings of loblolly pine. Tree Physiology, 24, 823-831.
URL PMID |
[20] | Liao CZ (廖成章), Yu XH (余翔华) (2001). Application of fractal theory on studies of the root structure of plant. Acta Agriculturae Universitis Jiangxiensis (江西农业大学学报), 23, 192-196. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] |
McMahon TA, Kronauer RE (1976). Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 59, 443-466.
DOI URL PMID |
[22] | Meng P (孟鹏), Zhang XL (张学利), Li YL (李玉灵), Song XD (宋晓东), You GC (尤国春) (2008). Rooting characteristics of Pinus densiflora var. zhangwuensis cuttings in various culture media. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 28, 504-508. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Müller I, Schmid B, Weiner J (2000). The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 3, 115-127. |
[24] | Niu S (牛山), Han QF (韩清芳), Jia ZK (贾志宽) (2007). Effects of different treatments on rooting capacity of Medicago sativa. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica (西北农业学报), 16, 149-152. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Obeso JR (2002). The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist, 155, 321-348. |
[26] | Phillion BJ, deWitt J, Bunting WR (1983). Propagation of juvenile Scots pine cuttings under a 24-hour photoperiod. Tree Planters’ Notes, 34, 39-42. |
[27] | Sun JS (孙敬爽), Zheng HJ (郑红娟), Jia DX (贾杜霞), Sun CZ (孙长忠), Wen L (文磊) (2008). Effects of different substrates, growth regulators, grades of cuttings and metabolism regulator on cutting propagation of Juniperus squamata ‘Blue Star’. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 30(1), 67-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Svenson SE, Davies FT Jr (1989). Photosynthesis and growth during root initiation and root development in poinsettia cuttings. Proceedings of the International Plant Propagators’ Society, 39, 385-389. |
[29] | Svenson SE, Davies FT Jr, Duray SA (1995). Gas exchange, water relations, and dry weight partitioning during root initiation and development of poinsettia cuttings. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 120, 454-459. |
[30] | Wang XP (王小平), Meng D (孟迪) (2005). The structure study on callus of cuttings branch of Taxus cuspidate. Journal of Tonghua Teachers College (通化师范学院学报), 26(6), 74-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | Wilkerson EG, Richard SG (2005). Transpiration capacity in poinsettia cuttings at different rooting stages and the development of a cutting coefficient for scheduling mist. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 130, 295-301. |
[32] | Yang XL (杨小林), Zhang XM (张希明), Li YL (李义玲), Xie TT (解婷婷), Wang WH (王伟华) (2009). Root fractal characteristics at the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert. Arid Land Geography (干旱区地理), 32, 249-254. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Zhu XY (朱湘渝), Wang RL (王瑞玲), Huang DS (黄东森) (1991). Research on the rooting properties of the new clones of Populus euramericana. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 27, 163-167. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn