Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 1224-1235.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0269
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
BAI Tian-Dao, YU Chun-Lan, GAN Ze-Chao, LAI Hai-Rong, YANG Yin-Chao, HUANG Hou-Chen, JIANG Wei-Xin*()
Received:
2020-08-06
Accepted:
2020-10-26
Online:
2020-12-20
Published:
2021-04-01
Contact:
JIANG Wei-Xin
About author:
*(jwx_1985@163.com)Supported by:
BAI Tian-Dao, YU Chun-Lan, GAN Ze-Chao, LAI Hai-Rong, YANG Yin-Chao, HUANG Hou-Chen, JIANG Wei-Xin. Association of cone and seed traits of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia with geo-meteorological factors[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(12): 1224-1235.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2020.0269
种群 Population | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔高度 Altitude (m) | 年平均气温 Mean annual air temperature (℃) | 年平均相对 湿度 Mean relative humidity (%) | 年降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm) | 地貌 Landform type | 坡度 Slope degree (°) | 土壤类型 Soil type | 林分类型 Stand type | 林分平均 胸径 DBH ± SD (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
兴义坝汪 Bawang, Xingyi (BW) | 104.83° | 24.70° | 872.1 | 17.1 | 79.6 | 1 301.7 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 10-15 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 26.03 ± 7.94 |
册亨弼佑 Biyou, Ceheng (BY) | 106.00° | 24.78° | 701.0 | 18.7 | 78.8 | 1 244.7 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 25-30 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 23.61 ± 8.44 |
兴义岔江 Chajiang, Xingyi (CJ) | 104.68° | 25.07° | 1 250.8 | 16.0 | 79.8 | 1 413.0 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 15-20 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 24.94 ± 9.79 |
望谟大观 Daguan, Wangmo (DG) | 106.27° | 25.08° | 870.0 | 18.7 | 78.1 | 1 211.6 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 10-15 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 32.64 ± 11.28 |
罗甸大亭 Dating, Luodian (DT) | 106.93° | 25.30° | 1 087.1 | 17.8 | 78.6 | 1 157.0 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 15-20 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 纯林 Pure stand | 24.56 ± 5.73 |
安龙钱相 Qianxiang, Anlong (QX) | 105.48° | 25.20° | 1 378.9 | 15.4 | 79.4 | 1 278.9 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 5-10 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 纯林 Pure stand | 20.65 ± 8.23 |
安龙新桥 Xinqiao, Anlong (XQ) | 105.28° | 25.15° | 1 315.0 | 16.1 | 79.6 | 1 266.9 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 10-15 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 26.29 ± 13.19 |
罗甸伍家坟 Wujiafen, Luodian (WJ) | 106.93° | 25.48° | 776.2 | 17.5 | 78.7 | 1 157.3 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 25-30 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 纯林 Pure stand | 35.74 ± 8.38 |
Table 1 Locations and meteorological factors of the sampling populations of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia
种群 Population | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔高度 Altitude (m) | 年平均气温 Mean annual air temperature (℃) | 年平均相对 湿度 Mean relative humidity (%) | 年降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm) | 地貌 Landform type | 坡度 Slope degree (°) | 土壤类型 Soil type | 林分类型 Stand type | 林分平均 胸径 DBH ± SD (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
兴义坝汪 Bawang, Xingyi (BW) | 104.83° | 24.70° | 872.1 | 17.1 | 79.6 | 1 301.7 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 10-15 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 26.03 ± 7.94 |
册亨弼佑 Biyou, Ceheng (BY) | 106.00° | 24.78° | 701.0 | 18.7 | 78.8 | 1 244.7 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 25-30 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 23.61 ± 8.44 |
兴义岔江 Chajiang, Xingyi (CJ) | 104.68° | 25.07° | 1 250.8 | 16.0 | 79.8 | 1 413.0 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 15-20 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 24.94 ± 9.79 |
望谟大观 Daguan, Wangmo (DG) | 106.27° | 25.08° | 870.0 | 18.7 | 78.1 | 1 211.6 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 10-15 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 32.64 ± 11.28 |
罗甸大亭 Dating, Luodian (DT) | 106.93° | 25.30° | 1 087.1 | 17.8 | 78.6 | 1 157.0 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 15-20 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 纯林 Pure stand | 24.56 ± 5.73 |
安龙钱相 Qianxiang, Anlong (QX) | 105.48° | 25.20° | 1 378.9 | 15.4 | 79.4 | 1 278.9 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 5-10 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 纯林 Pure stand | 20.65 ± 8.23 |
安龙新桥 Xinqiao, Anlong (XQ) | 105.28° | 25.15° | 1 315.0 | 16.1 | 79.6 | 1 266.9 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 10-15 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 松栎混交林 Pine-oak forest | 26.29 ± 13.19 |
罗甸伍家坟 Wujiafen, Luodian (WJ) | 106.93° | 25.48° | 776.2 | 17.5 | 78.7 | 1 157.3 | 山地峡谷 Mountain gulch | 25-30 | 砖红壤 Latosol | 纯林 Pure stand | 35.74 ± 8.38 |
性状Trait | 均方 Mean square | F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within populations | 随机误差 Random error | 种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within populations | |
CL | 4 460.408 | 831.114 | 42.857 | 104.075*** | 19.393*** |
CW | 596.236 | 173.065 | 5.813 | 102.560*** | 29.770*** |
CR | 0.995 | 0.240 | 0.017 | 58.159*** | 14.041*** |
FM | 11 240.191 | 2 093.936 | 81.514 | 137.893*** | 25.688*** |
SL | 27.586 | 11.767 | 0.122 | 226.300*** | 96.532*** |
SW | 5.184 | 2.726 | 0.065 | 79.562*** | 41.835*** |
SR | 16.907 | 7.154 | 0.102 | 166.553*** | 70.471*** |
TSM | 97.442 | 48.754 | 0.418 | 233.050*** | 116.603*** |
WL | 647.766 | 335.707 | 2.428 | 266.774*** | 138.257*** |
WW | 25.997 | 19.652 | 0.375 | 69.362*** | 52.433*** |
WR | 1.045 | 0.658 | 0.020 | 52.216*** | 32.874*** |
Table 2 Nested-ANOVA of cone and seed traits among and within populations of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia
性状Trait | 均方 Mean square | F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within populations | 随机误差 Random error | 种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within populations | |
CL | 4 460.408 | 831.114 | 42.857 | 104.075*** | 19.393*** |
CW | 596.236 | 173.065 | 5.813 | 102.560*** | 29.770*** |
CR | 0.995 | 0.240 | 0.017 | 58.159*** | 14.041*** |
FM | 11 240.191 | 2 093.936 | 81.514 | 137.893*** | 25.688*** |
SL | 27.586 | 11.767 | 0.122 | 226.300*** | 96.532*** |
SW | 5.184 | 2.726 | 0.065 | 79.562*** | 41.835*** |
SR | 16.907 | 7.154 | 0.102 | 166.553*** | 70.471*** |
TSM | 97.442 | 48.754 | 0.418 | 233.050*** | 116.603*** |
WL | 647.766 | 335.707 | 2.428 | 266.774*** | 138.257*** |
WW | 25.997 | 19.652 | 0.375 | 69.362*** | 52.433*** |
WR | 1.045 | 0.658 | 0.020 | 52.216*** | 32.874*** |
种群 Population | CL (mm) (SD) | CW (mm) (SD) | CR (SD) | FM (g) (SD) | SL (mm) (SD) | SW (mm) (SD) | SR (SD) | TSM (g) (SD) | WL (mm) (SD) | WW (mm) (SD) | WR (SD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
兴义坝汪 Bawang, Xingyi | 53.72g (9.64) | 31.52d (4.07) | 1.70e (0.18) | 26.07f (11.94) | 5.54c (0.75) | 3.18d (0.38) | 1.76b (0.28) | 11.88e (2.73) | 17.70e (3.18) | 5.78e (1.01) | 3.11d (0.58) |
册亨弼佑 Biyou, Ceheng | 63.10de (9.76) | 34.18c (3.90) | 1.85b (0.20) | 40.37d (14.13) | 5.79b (0.57) | 3.41b (0.36) | 1.70c (0.15) | 14.81bcd (2.93) | 19.66c (2.93) | 6.00d (0.94) | 3.32b (0.51) |
兴义岔江 Chajiang, Xingyi | 60.81e (11.73) | 34.78c (5.32) | 1.75de (0.21) | 39.62d (17.98) | 5.48c (0.50) | 3.40b (0.35) | 1.63d (0.18) | 14.91bc (4.24) | 19.70c (2.93) | 6.32c (0.99) | 3.16d (0.46) |
望谟大观 Daguan, Wangmo | 63.61cd (9.23) | 36.51b (4.55) | 1.75de (0.20) | 44.69c (14.86) | 5.77b (0.65) | 3.41b (0.32) | 1.70c (0.18) | 14.42cd (3.18) | 19.49c (3.38) | 6.49a (0.93) | 3.03e (0.49) |
罗甸大亭 Dating, Luodian | 67.83b (7.01) | 38.18a (4.12) | 1.78cd (0.15) | 50.32b (14.76) | 6.09a (0.59) | 3.49a (0.26) | 1.75b (0.18) | 16.78a (2.82) | 20.38b (2.72) | 6.37abc (0.57) | 3.23c (0.57) |
安龙钱相 Qianxiang, Anlong | 57.51f (12.42) | 35.06c (5.12) | 1.63f (0.16) | 33.86e (13.36) | 5.36d (0.58) | 3.19d (0.35) | 1.69c (0.13) | 13.23cde (4.46) | 18.09de (1.90) | 6.45ab (0.77) | 2.83f (0.35) |
罗甸伍家坟 Wujiafen, Luodian | 72.34a (11.08) | 37.22ab (4.02) | 1.94a (0.16) | 54.62a (18.56) | 6.04a (0.49) | 3.39b (0.28) | 1.79a (0.16) | 16.48ab (2.71) | 21.31a (2.97) | 6.28c (0.69) | 3.41a (0.49) |
安龙新桥 Xinqiao, Anlong | 66.16bc (9.92) | 36.35b (3.66) | 1.82bc (0.18) | 47.80bc (14.78) | 5.54c (0.54) | 3.28c (0.36) | 1.70c (0.15) | 13.07de (3.69) | 18.27d (2.79) | 6.34bc (0.83) | 2.90f (0.33) |
Table 3 Mean, standard deviation (SD) and Duncan’s multiple range test of cone and seed traits of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia
种群 Population | CL (mm) (SD) | CW (mm) (SD) | CR (SD) | FM (g) (SD) | SL (mm) (SD) | SW (mm) (SD) | SR (SD) | TSM (g) (SD) | WL (mm) (SD) | WW (mm) (SD) | WR (SD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
兴义坝汪 Bawang, Xingyi | 53.72g (9.64) | 31.52d (4.07) | 1.70e (0.18) | 26.07f (11.94) | 5.54c (0.75) | 3.18d (0.38) | 1.76b (0.28) | 11.88e (2.73) | 17.70e (3.18) | 5.78e (1.01) | 3.11d (0.58) |
册亨弼佑 Biyou, Ceheng | 63.10de (9.76) | 34.18c (3.90) | 1.85b (0.20) | 40.37d (14.13) | 5.79b (0.57) | 3.41b (0.36) | 1.70c (0.15) | 14.81bcd (2.93) | 19.66c (2.93) | 6.00d (0.94) | 3.32b (0.51) |
兴义岔江 Chajiang, Xingyi | 60.81e (11.73) | 34.78c (5.32) | 1.75de (0.21) | 39.62d (17.98) | 5.48c (0.50) | 3.40b (0.35) | 1.63d (0.18) | 14.91bc (4.24) | 19.70c (2.93) | 6.32c (0.99) | 3.16d (0.46) |
望谟大观 Daguan, Wangmo | 63.61cd (9.23) | 36.51b (4.55) | 1.75de (0.20) | 44.69c (14.86) | 5.77b (0.65) | 3.41b (0.32) | 1.70c (0.18) | 14.42cd (3.18) | 19.49c (3.38) | 6.49a (0.93) | 3.03e (0.49) |
罗甸大亭 Dating, Luodian | 67.83b (7.01) | 38.18a (4.12) | 1.78cd (0.15) | 50.32b (14.76) | 6.09a (0.59) | 3.49a (0.26) | 1.75b (0.18) | 16.78a (2.82) | 20.38b (2.72) | 6.37abc (0.57) | 3.23c (0.57) |
安龙钱相 Qianxiang, Anlong | 57.51f (12.42) | 35.06c (5.12) | 1.63f (0.16) | 33.86e (13.36) | 5.36d (0.58) | 3.19d (0.35) | 1.69c (0.13) | 13.23cde (4.46) | 18.09de (1.90) | 6.45ab (0.77) | 2.83f (0.35) |
罗甸伍家坟 Wujiafen, Luodian | 72.34a (11.08) | 37.22ab (4.02) | 1.94a (0.16) | 54.62a (18.56) | 6.04a (0.49) | 3.39b (0.28) | 1.79a (0.16) | 16.48ab (2.71) | 21.31a (2.97) | 6.28c (0.69) | 3.41a (0.49) |
安龙新桥 Xinqiao, Anlong | 66.16bc (9.92) | 36.35b (3.66) | 1.82bc (0.18) | 47.80bc (14.78) | 5.54c (0.54) | 3.28c (0.36) | 1.70c (0.15) | 13.07de (3.69) | 18.27d (2.79) | 6.34bc (0.83) | 2.90f (0.33) |
种群 Population | 表型变异系数 CV (%) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | CW | CR | FM | SL | SW | SR | TSM | WL | WW | WR | Mean | |
兴义坝汪 Bawang, Xingyi | 17.94 | 12.91 | 10.59 | 45.80 | 13.54 | 11.95 | 15.91 | 22.98 | 17.97 | 17.47 | 18.65 | 18.70 |
册亨弼佑 Biyou, Ceheng | 15.47 | 11.41 | 10.81 | 35.00 | 9.84 | 10.56 | 8.82 | 19.78 | 14.90 | 15.67 | 15.36 | 15.24 |
兴义岔江 Chajiang, Xingyi | 19.29 | 15.30 | 12.00 | 45.38 | 9.12 | 10.29 | 11.04 | 28.44 | 14.87 | 15.66 | 14.56 | 17.81 |
望谟大观 Daguan, Wangmo | 14.51 | 12.46 | 11.43 | 33.25 | 11.27 | 9.38 | 10.59 | 22.05 | 17.34 | 14.33 | 16.17 | 15.71 |
罗甸大亭 Dating, Luodian | 10.33 | 10.79 | 8.43 | 29.33 | 9.69 | 7.45 | 10.29 | 16.81 | 13.35 | 8.95 | 17.65 | 13.01 |
安龙钱相 Qianxiang, Anlong | 21.60 | 14.60 | 9.82 | 39.46 | 10.82 | 10.97 | 7.69 | 33.71 | 10.50 | 11.94 | 12.37 | 16.68 |
罗甸伍家坟 Wujiafen, Luodian | 15.32 | 10.80 | 8.25 | 33.98 | 8.11 | 8.26 | 8.94 | 16.44 | 13.94 | 10.99 | 14.37 | 13.58 |
安龙新桥 Xinqiao, Anlong | 14.99 | 10.07 | 9.89 | 30.92 | 9.75 | 10.98 | 8.82 | 28.23 | 15.27 | 13.09 | 11.38 | 14.85 |
平均值 Mean | 16.18 | 12.29 | 10.15 | 36.64 | 10.27 | 9.98 | 10.27 | 23.56 | 14.77 | 13.51 | 15.07 | 15.70 |
种群间变异系数 CVA | 9.31 | 5.85 | 5.33 | 21.91 | 4.67 | 3.39 | 2.91 | 11.67 | 6.37 | 3.87 | 6.38 | 7.42 |
种群 Population | 表型变异系数 CV (%) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | CW | CR | FM | SL | SW | SR | TSM | WL | WW | WR | Mean | |
兴义坝汪 Bawang, Xingyi | 17.94 | 12.91 | 10.59 | 45.80 | 13.54 | 11.95 | 15.91 | 22.98 | 17.97 | 17.47 | 18.65 | 18.70 |
册亨弼佑 Biyou, Ceheng | 15.47 | 11.41 | 10.81 | 35.00 | 9.84 | 10.56 | 8.82 | 19.78 | 14.90 | 15.67 | 15.36 | 15.24 |
兴义岔江 Chajiang, Xingyi | 19.29 | 15.30 | 12.00 | 45.38 | 9.12 | 10.29 | 11.04 | 28.44 | 14.87 | 15.66 | 14.56 | 17.81 |
望谟大观 Daguan, Wangmo | 14.51 | 12.46 | 11.43 | 33.25 | 11.27 | 9.38 | 10.59 | 22.05 | 17.34 | 14.33 | 16.17 | 15.71 |
罗甸大亭 Dating, Luodian | 10.33 | 10.79 | 8.43 | 29.33 | 9.69 | 7.45 | 10.29 | 16.81 | 13.35 | 8.95 | 17.65 | 13.01 |
安龙钱相 Qianxiang, Anlong | 21.60 | 14.60 | 9.82 | 39.46 | 10.82 | 10.97 | 7.69 | 33.71 | 10.50 | 11.94 | 12.37 | 16.68 |
罗甸伍家坟 Wujiafen, Luodian | 15.32 | 10.80 | 8.25 | 33.98 | 8.11 | 8.26 | 8.94 | 16.44 | 13.94 | 10.99 | 14.37 | 13.58 |
安龙新桥 Xinqiao, Anlong | 14.99 | 10.07 | 9.89 | 30.92 | 9.75 | 10.98 | 8.82 | 28.23 | 15.27 | 13.09 | 11.38 | 14.85 |
平均值 Mean | 16.18 | 12.29 | 10.15 | 36.64 | 10.27 | 9.98 | 10.27 | 23.56 | 14.77 | 13.51 | 15.07 | 15.70 |
种群间变异系数 CVA | 9.31 | 5.85 | 5.33 | 21.91 | 4.67 | 3.39 | 2.91 | 11.67 | 6.37 | 3.87 | 6.38 | 7.42 |
性状 Trait | 方差分量 Variance component | 方差分量百分比 Percentage of variance component (%) | 表型分化系数 Coefficient of phenotypic differentiation (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within populations | 随机误差 Random error | 种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within populations | 随机误差 Random error | ||
CL | 45.405 5 | 68.437 6 | 42.767 7 | 28.99 | 43.70 | 27.31 | 39.88 |
CW | 4.573 8 | 14.312 0 | 5.805 9 | 18.52 | 57.96 | 23.51 | 24.22 |
CR | 0.011 0 | 0.017 6 | 0.017 0 | 24.04 | 38.65 | 37.31 | 38.35 |
FM | 85.877 4 | 161.015 3 | 81.274 8 | 26.17 | 49.06 | 24.77 | 34.79 |
SL | 0.037 4 | 0.233 9 | 0.121 9 | 9.52 | 59.48 | 31.00 | 13.80 |
SW | 0.005 6 | 0.053 4 | 0.065 2 | 4.54 | 43.00 | 52.46 | 9.55 |
SR | 0.000 9 | 0.012 8 | 0.020 0 | 2.53 | 38.06 | 59.41 | 6.23 |
TSM | 1.427 1 | 12.075 3 | 0.418 1 | 10.25 | 86.74 | 3.00 | 10.57 |
WL | 0.729 8 | 6.661 7 | 2.428 1 | 7.43 | 67.84 | 24.73 | 9.87 |
WW | 0.016 6 | 0.383 8 | 0.374 8 | 2.14 | 49.51 | 48.35 | 4.14 |
WR | 0.022 6 | 0.141 1 | 0.101 5 | 8.52 | 53.21 | 38.27 | 13.80 |
平均值Mean | 12.97 | 53.38 | 33.65 | 18.65 |
Table 5 Variance components and differentiation coefficient of phenotypic traits of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia
性状 Trait | 方差分量 Variance component | 方差分量百分比 Percentage of variance component (%) | 表型分化系数 Coefficient of phenotypic differentiation (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within populations | 随机误差 Random error | 种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within populations | 随机误差 Random error | ||
CL | 45.405 5 | 68.437 6 | 42.767 7 | 28.99 | 43.70 | 27.31 | 39.88 |
CW | 4.573 8 | 14.312 0 | 5.805 9 | 18.52 | 57.96 | 23.51 | 24.22 |
CR | 0.011 0 | 0.017 6 | 0.017 0 | 24.04 | 38.65 | 37.31 | 38.35 |
FM | 85.877 4 | 161.015 3 | 81.274 8 | 26.17 | 49.06 | 24.77 | 34.79 |
SL | 0.037 4 | 0.233 9 | 0.121 9 | 9.52 | 59.48 | 31.00 | 13.80 |
SW | 0.005 6 | 0.053 4 | 0.065 2 | 4.54 | 43.00 | 52.46 | 9.55 |
SR | 0.000 9 | 0.012 8 | 0.020 0 | 2.53 | 38.06 | 59.41 | 6.23 |
TSM | 1.427 1 | 12.075 3 | 0.418 1 | 10.25 | 86.74 | 3.00 | 10.57 |
WL | 0.729 8 | 6.661 7 | 2.428 1 | 7.43 | 67.84 | 24.73 | 9.87 |
WW | 0.016 6 | 0.383 8 | 0.374 8 | 2.14 | 49.51 | 48.35 | 4.14 |
WR | 0.022 6 | 0.141 1 | 0.101 5 | 8.52 | 53.21 | 38.27 | 13.80 |
平均值Mean | 12.97 | 53.38 | 33.65 | 18.65 |
Fig. 1 Pearson correlation between phenotypic traits and geo-meteorological parameters of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia. * and ** denote significant correlation between variables at α = 0.05 and α = 0.01. Alt, altitude; CL, cone length; CR, cone aspect ratio; CW, cone width; FM, fresh cone mass; Lat, latitude; Lon, longitude; MAP, mean annual precipitation; MAT, mean annual air temperature; MRH, mean relative humidity; SL, seed length; SR, seed aspect ratio; SW, seed width; TSM, thousand-seeds mass; WL, seed-wing length; WR, seed-wing aspect ratio; WW, seed-wing width.
Fig. 2 Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) between phenotypic traits and geo-meteorological factors. Alt, altitude; CL, cone length; CR, cone aspect ratio; CW, cone width; FM, fresh cone mass; Lat, latitude; Lon, longitude; MAP, mean annual precipitation; MAT, mean annual air temperature; MRH, mean relative humidity; SL, seed length; SR, seed aspect ratio; SW, seed width; TSM, thousand-seeds mass; WL, seed-wing length; WR, seed-wing aspect ratio; WW, seed-wing width.
Fig. 3 Distribution model of the seed and cone traits of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia with the geo-meteorological factors. MAP, mean annual precipitation; MAT, mean annual air temperature; MRH, mean relative humidity; SL, seed length; PC1 (63.98%), the score of the first principal component of each population based on principal component analysis of seed and cone traits. See Table1 for population abbreviation (BW, BY, CJ, DG, DT, QX, WJ, XQ).
Fig. 4 Principal component and cluster analysis based on the phenotypic traits of eight natural populations in Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia. A, The optimal number of clusters determined by average silhouette width. B, Population clustering by K-Medoids algorithm. See Table1 for population abbreviation (BW, BY, CJ, DG, DT, QX, WJ, XQ).
Fig. 5 Mantel test between morpho-distance and geo-distance (Euclidean distance). A, Mantel test based on the 999 times of permutations. B, Correlation plot between morpho-distance and geo-distance. The single consistent cloud of point based on the 2-dimensional kernel density estimation indicates that the variation pattern of populations is a cline.
[1] | Andersson S (1996). Seed size as a determinant of germination rate in Crepis tectorum(Asteraceae): evidence from a seed burial experiment. Botany, 74, 568-572. |
[2] |
Bazin J, Batlla D, Dussert S, El-Maarouf-Bouteau H, Bailly C (2011). Role of relative humidity, temperature, and water status in dormancy alleviation of sunflower seeds during dry after-ripening. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 627-640.
URL PMID |
[3] | Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomez-Rubio V (2013). Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. 2nd ed. Springer, New York. |
[4] | Businsky R, Frantík T, Vít P (2014). Morphological evaluation of the Pinus kesiyacomplex(Pinaceae). Plant Systematics & Evolution, 300, 273-285. |
[5] | Cilas C, Machado R, Motamayor JC (2009). Relations between several traits linked to sexual plant reproduction in Theobroma cacao L.: number of ovules per ovary, number of seeds per pod, and seed weight. Tree Genetics Genomes, 6, 219-226. |
[6] | Diao SF, Shao WH, Jiang JM, Dong RX, Sun HG (2014). Phenotypic diversity in natural populations of Sapindus mukorossi based on fruit and seed traits. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 1451-1460. |
[ 刁松锋, 邵文豪, 姜景民, 董汝湘, 孙洪刚 (2014). 基于种实性状的无患子天然群体表型多样性研究. 生态学报, 34, 1451-1460.] | |
[7] |
Donohue K, Pyle EH, Messiqua D, Heschel MS, Schmitt J (2001). Adaptive divergence in plasticity in natural populations of Impatiens capensis and its consequences for performance in novel habitats. Evolution, 55, 692-702.
URL PMID |
[8] |
Etterson JR (2004). Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. I. Clinal parterns of selection along an environmental gradient in the great plants. Evolution, 58, 1446-1456.
DOI URL PMID |
[9] |
Feng QH, Shi ZM, Xu ZJR, Miao N, Tang JC, Liu XL, Zhang L (2017). Phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Cupressus chengiana populations in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 748-756.
DOI URL PMID |
[ 冯秋红, 史作民, 徐峥静茹, 缪宁, 唐敬超, 刘兴良, 张雷 (2017). 岷江柏天然种群种实表型变异特征. 应用生态学报, 28, 748-756.]
PMID |
|
[10] | Ge S, Wang MX, Chen YW (1988). An analysis of population genetic structure of masson pine by isozyme technique. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 24, 399-409. |
[ 葛颂, 王明庥, 陈岳武 (1988). 用同工酶研究马尾松群体的遗传结构. 林业科学, 24, 399-409.] | |
[11] | Gitonga L, Kahangi E, Muigai A, Ngamau K, Gichuki S, Cheluget W, Wepukhulu S (2008). Assessment of phenotypic diversity of macadamia (Macadamia spp.) germplasm in Kenya using leaf and fruit morphology. African Journal of Plant Science, 2, 86-93. |
[12] | González I, Déjean S (2012). CCA: canonical correlation analysis. R package version 1.2. [2020-08-06]. https:// CRAN.R-project.org/package=CCA. |
[13] | Graler B, Pebesma E, Heuvelink GB (2016). Spatio-temporal interpolation using gstat. R Journal, 8, 204-218. |
[14] | Gu YJ, Luo JX, Wu YW, Cao XJ (2009). Phenotypic diversity in natural population of Picea balfouriana in Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 291-301. |
[ 辜云杰, 罗建勋, 吴远伟, 曹小军 (2009). 川西云杉天然种群表型多样性. 植物生态学报, 33, 291-301.] | |
[15] | Harrell Jr FE, Dupont C (2020). Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.4-0. [2020-08-06]. https://CRAN.R-project. org/package=Hmisc. |
[16] | He QH, Yang SZ, Li YG, Shen X, Liu XH (2018). Phenotypic variations in seed and fruit traits of Liquidambar formosana populations. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 42, 752-763. |
[ 何庆海, 杨少宗, 李因刚, 沈鑫, 柳新红 (2018). 枫香树种群种子与果实表型性状变异分析. 植物生态学报, 42, 752-763.] | |
[17] | Ji MF, Zhang XW, Han J, Ding DL (2013). Phenotypic diversity of cone and seed in natural Pinus tabuliformis populations in China. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidential Sinica, 33, 1898-1905. |
[ 姬明飞, 张晓玮, 韩瑾, 丁东粮 (2013). 油松天然群体的种实性状表型多样性研究. 西北植物学报, 33, 1898-1905.] | |
[18] |
Jombart T (2008). adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics, 24, 1403-1405.
URL PMID |
[19] | Kassambara A (2017). Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: unsupervised machine learning. [2020-08-06]. http://www. sthda.com. |
[20] | Li B, Gu WC, Lu BM (2002). A study on phenotypic diversity of seeds and cones characteristics in Pinus bungeana. Biodiversity Science, 10, 181-188. |
[ 李斌, 顾万春, 卢宝明 (2002). 白皮松天然群体种实性状表型多样性研究. 生物多样性, 10, 51-58.] | |
[21] | Li SF, Su JR, Liu WD, Lang XD, Zhang ZJ, Su L, Jia CXZ, Yang HJ (2013). Phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis populations in Yunnan Province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 998-1009. |
[ 李帅锋, 苏建荣, 刘万德, 郎学东, 张志钧, 苏磊, 贾呈鑫卓, 杨华景 (2013). 思茅松天然群体种实表型变异. 植物生态学报, 37, 998-1009.] | |
[22] | Li YF, He JA, Yu SF, Liao LN, Wang HX, Ye SM (2019). Spatial patterns of trees in a south subtropical Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia forest after selective logging of large-sized trees. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38, 3585-3592. |
[ 李远发, 何吉安, 喻素芳, 廖良宁, 王宏翔, 叶绍明 (2019). 南亚热带细叶云南松林大径木择伐后的空间格局. 生态学杂志, 38, 3585-3592.] | |
[23] | Li ZJ, Wang XP (1981). The distribution of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia in relation to the environmental conditions. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica, 5, 28-37. |
[ 李治基, 王献溥 (1981). 广西细叶云南松地理分布和环境的关系. 植物生态学报, 5, 28-37.] | |
[24] | Liao LN, Lu ZJ, Li YF, Ye SM, Yu SF (2019). Litter and soil nutrient characteristics of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia natural forest in northwest Guangxi. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 34, 31-38. |
[ 廖良宁, 卢姿瑾, 李远发, 叶绍明, 喻素芳 (2019). 桂西北细叶云南松天然林凋落物及土壤养分特征. 西北林学院学报, 34, 31-38.] | |
[25] | Liu XS, Jiang Y, Huang RL, Liu F, Xiao YF, Jiang Y, Wei SX (2017). Variation in traits of cone and seed of Keteleeria fortunei var. cyclolepis and its relationship with environmental factors. Guihaia, 37, 118-126. |
[ 刘雄盛, 蒋燚, 黄荣林, 刘菲, 肖玉菲, 姜英, 韦铄星 (2017). 江南油杉种实性状变异及其与环境因子的关系. 广西植物, 37, 118-126.] | |
[26] | Liu Y, Ma WJ, Yang GJ, Wang JC, Yi F, Wang YT, Wang JH, Wang CY (2019). Geographical variation of the seed and germination characteristics of natural populations of Sophora moorcroftiana. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 34, 22-29. |
[ 刘莹, 麻文俊, 杨桂娟, 王俊臣, 易飞, 王玉婷, 王军辉, 王春燕 (2019). 砂生槐天然种群种实形态和萌发特征地理变异. 西北林学院学报, 34, 22-29.] | |
[27] | Logan M (2010). Biostatistical Design and Analysis Using R: A Practical Guide. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK. |
[28] | Luo JX, Gu WC (2005). Study on phenotypic diversity of natural population in Picea asperata. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 41(2), 66-73. |
[ 罗建勋, 顾万春 (2005). 云杉天然群体表型多样性研究. 林业科学, 41(2), 66-73.] | |
[29] | McLaren KP, McDonald MA (2003). The effects of moisture and shade on seed germination and seedling survival in a tropical dry forest in Jamaica. Forest Ecology and Management, 183, 61-75. |
[30] | Mosseler LMOCA, Rajora OP (2007). Extensive long-distance pollen dispersal in a fragmented landscape maintains genetic diversity in white spruce. Journal of Heredity, 98, 640-645. |
[31] | Pan T (2018). Study on Structure Characteristics of the Main Tree Species of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia Secondary Forest in the Nanpan River Basin. Master degree dissertation, Guangxi University, Nanning. |
[ 潘婷 (2018). 南盘江流域细叶云南松次生林主要树种结构特征研究. 硕士学位论文, 广西大学, 南宁.] | |
[32] | R Core Team (2018). R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. |
[33] | Shen L, Xu R, Sai Liu S, Jun C, Xu C, Xie C, Liu T (2015). Phenotypic variation of seed traits of Haloxylon ammodendron and its affecting factors. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 60, 81-87. |
[34] | Shirley L, Vesk P (2009). Eucalyptus phylogenetics: How traits, evolution, and the environment influence the distribution of a diverse genus. 94th ESA Annual Convention, Austin, USA. |
[35] |
Simons AM, Johnston MO (2000). Variation in seed traits of Lobelia inflata(Campanulaceae): sources and fitness consequences. American Journal of Botany, 87, 124-132.
URL PMID |
[36] | Sun C, Wang J, Duan J, Zhao G, Weng X, Jia L (2017). Association of fruit and seed traits of Sapindus mukorossi germplasm with environmental factors in southern China. Forests, 8, 491. DOI: 10.3390/f8120491. |
[37] |
Tennekes M (2018). tmap: thematic maps in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 84, 1-39.
DOI URL PMID |
[38] |
Wall SBV (2008). On the relative contributions of wind vs. animals to seed dispersal of four Sierra Nevada pines. Ecology, 89, 1837-1849.
URL PMID |
[39] | Wang XP (1991). The phytocoenological features of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia forest in Guangxi. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 11, 91-103. |
[ 王献溥 (1991). 广西细叶云南松林的群落学特点. 植物研究, 11, 91-103.] | |
[40] | Wei T, Simko V (2017). R package “corrplot”: visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.84). [2020-08-06]. https:// github.com/taiyun/corrplot. |
[41] | Wickham H (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. |
[42] | Wu DS, Tang X, Cen ZM, Xu CL, Yang ZQ (2016). Dynamic analysis of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia forest resources in Guangxi. Guangxi Forestry Science, 45, 316-321. |
[ 吴东山, 唐鑫, 岑祖明, 许春林, 杨章旗 (2016). 广西细叶云南松森林资源动态分析. 广西林业科学, 45, 316-321.] | |
[43] | Wu H, Meng H, Wang S, Wei X, Jiang M (2018). Geographic patterns and environmental drivers of seed traits of a relict tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 422, 59-68. |
[44] | Xu XL (1983). Geographical distribution and growth characteristics of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia forest in Guizhou Province. Guizhou Science, 94-98. |
[ 徐学良 (1983). 细叶云南松林在贵州的地理分布和生长特性. 贵州科学, 94-98.] | |
[45] | Xu Y, Deng LL, Zhou L, Cai NH, Luo YR, Li DL, Duan AA, Xu YL (2015). Seeds and cones phenotypic variation among populations of Pinus yunnanensis at different altitudes. Seed, 34, 70-74. |
[ 徐杨, 邓丽丽, 周丽, 蔡年辉, 罗一然, 李德龙, 段安安, 许玉兰 (2015). 云南松不同海拔天然群体种实性状表型多样性研究. 种子, 34, 70-74.] | |
[46] | Yang ZQ, Feng YH, Wu DS (2014). Analysis of genetic diversity of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia nature populations by SSR marker. Guihaia, 34, 10-14. |
[ 杨章旗, 冯源恒, 吴东山 (2014). 细叶云南松天然种源林遗传多样性的SSR分析. 广西植物, 34, 10-14.] | |
[47] | Yu S, She G, Ye S, Zhou X, Li Y (2018). Characteristics of soil microbial biomass and community composition in Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia secondary forests view supplementary material. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 37, 753-770. |
[48] |
Zhang MY, Su CX, Lu CH (2020). Cones structure and seed traits of four species of large-seeded pines: adaptation to animal-mediated dispersal. Ecology and Evolution, 10, 5293-5301.
URL PMID |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn