Research Articles

ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO SOIL WATER CONTENT IN FOUR HYBRID POPULUS CLONES

Expand
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    2State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Received date: 2008-03-24

  Accepted date: 2008-10-09

  Online published: 2009-03-31

Abstract

Aims Pot experiments were conducted to investigate effects of water deficit and duration of the deficit (0, 15, 36 and 14 days recovery) on four hybrid Populus: 15-29 (P. trichocarpa × P. deltoids), DN-2 (P. deltoids × P. nigra), DN-14274 (P. deltoids × P. nigra) and R-270 (P. deltoids × P. nigra). Our objective was to examine the responses of Populus plants to soil water deficit by analyzing eco-physiological, morphological, and growth characteristics, as well as several parameters of plant performance.

Methods Seedlings were exposed to four treatments: 100%, 70%, 50% and 30% of soil field water capacity (treatments T1-T4, respectively).

Important findings The four hybrids were sensitive to water deficit. All developed physiological adaptive mechanisms as well as configurational strategies to cope with water shortages to different degrees by closing stomata and reducing leaf number and leaf area to regulate water loss, by depressing net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and leaf water potential (ψ) to enhance water use efficiency (WUE), or by changing allocation of biomass productivity (Bp). Under water stress, R-270 only decreased its leaf dry weight but the other three hybrids decreased their dry weight of leaf, stem and root. With declining soil moisture, root/shoot of 15-29 and R-270 increased, implying the roots obtained more carbohydrates, which favors water absorption. Carbon isotope composition (δ13) of DN-2 was significantly positively correlated to WUE, but δ13 of R-270 was significantly negatively correlated to WUE. Pn, stomatal conductance (Gs), Tr,ψ, biomass and canopy areas of the seedlings in T1 and T2 are higher than those in T3 and T4, suggesting that the four hybrids can obtain high production in arid areas under sufficient-moderate irrigation. LowerPn, Gs, Tr,ψ, biomass, canopy areas and higher WUE of the seedling in T3 and T4 indicate that the four hybrids can develop survival strategies under water stress, but biomass production was negatively affected. Clone 15-29 and R-270 showed a stronger adaptive response than DN-2 and DN-14274 under water stress, implying they have greater drought-resistance ability.

Cite this article

GONG Ji-Rui, HUANG Yong-Mei, GE Zhi-Wei, DUAN Qing-Wei, YOU Xin, AN Ran, ZHANG Xin-Shi . ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO SOIL WATER CONTENT IN FOUR HYBRID POPULUS CLONES[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009 , 33(2) : 387 -396 . DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.02.017

References

[1] Aussenac G (2000). Interactions between forest stands and microclimate: eco-physiological aspects and consequences for silviculture. Annals of Forest Science, 57,287-301.
[2] Becker M, Nieminen TM, Geremia F (1994). Short-term variations and long-term changes in oak productivity in northeastern France: the role of climate and atmospheric CO2. Annals of Forest Science, 51,477-492.
[3] Bray EA (2004). Genes commonly regulated by water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany, 5,2331-2341.
[4] Caldwell M, Chabot BF, Mooney HA (1985). Physiological Ecology of North American Plant Communities. Chapman & Hall, New York, 198-212.
[5] Cowan IK (1982). Stomatal physiology and gas exchange in the field. In: Steffen WL ed. Flow and Transport in the Natural Environment: Advances and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 160-172.
[6] Deng X (邓雄), Li XM (李小明), Zhang XM (张希明) (2002). A study of the gas exchange characteristics of four desert plants. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 26,605-612. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Donvan LA, Ehleringer JR (1994). Potential for selection on plants for water-use efficiency as estimated by carbon isotope discrimination. American Journal of Botany, 81,927-935.
[8] Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989). Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 40,503-537.
[9] Feng YL (冯玉龙), Ju GS (巨关升), Zhu CQ (朱春全) (2003). Responses of photosynthesis and PV parameters to water stress in poplar clone seedling. Scientia Silvae Sinicae(林业科学), 39(3),30-36. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Flexas J, Medrano H (2002). Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Annals of Botany, 89,183-189.
[11] Gower ST, Vogt KA, Grier CC (1992). Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecological Monographs, 62,43-65.
[12] Hajheidari M, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Askari H, Heidari M, Sadeghian SY, Ober ES, Salekdeh GH (2005). Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress. Proteomics, 5,950-960.
[13] Hasiao TC, Acevedo E, Fereres E (1976). Water stress, growth and osmotic adjustment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 273,479.
[14] Hu XS (胡新生), Wang SJ (王世绩) (1997). A possible index for drought tolerance-response lag. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 25,1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] Jain SK, Singh P (2000). Economic analysis of industrial agroforestry: poplar ( Populus deltoides) in Uttar Pradesh (India). Agroforestry Systems, 49,255-273.
[16] Jia LM (贾黎明), Xing CS (刑场山), Wei YK (韦艳葵), Li YA (李延安), Yang L (杨丽) (2004). The growth and photosynthesis of poplar trees in fast-growing and high yield plantations with subterranean drip irrigation. Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 40,61-67. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] Ju GS (巨关生), Wu XC (吴晓春) (2000). Comparison oil the transpiration values measured with steady state porometer and other three methods. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 13,360-365. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Kawaguchi R, Girke T, Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J (2004). Differential mRNA translation contributes to gene regulation under non-stress and dehydration stress conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 38,823-839.
[19] Kreps JA, Wu YJ, Chang HS, Zhu T, Wang X, Harper JF (2002). Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiology, 130,2129-2141.
[20] Li CY (1999). Carbon isotope composition, water-use efficiency and biomass productivity of Eucalyptus micritheca populations under different water supplies. Plant and Soil, 214,165-171.
[21] Li HJ (李洪建), Chai BF (柴宝峰), Wang MB (王孟本) (2000). Study on the water physio-ecological characteristics of Populus beijingensis. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 20,417-422. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] Liu FJ (刘奉觉), Zheng SK (郑世锴), Ju GS (巨关升) (1991). A study on comparison of measuring water consumption for transpiration in poplar. Scientia Silvae Sinicae(林业科学), 33,117-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] Liu JW (刘建伟), Liu YR (刘雅荣), Wang SJ (王世绩) (1994). Relations between the net photosynthesis and their drought tolerance in six poplar clones. Scientia Silvae Sinicae(林业科学), 30,53-87. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Macfarlane C, Adams MA, White DA (2004). Productivity, carbon isotope discrimination and leaf traits of tree of Eucalyptus globules Labill. in relation to water availability. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27,1515-1524.
[25] Meinzer FC, Saliendra NZ, Crisosto CH (1992). Carbon isotope discrimination and gas exchange in Coffea arabica during adjustment to different soil moisture regimes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 19,171-184.
[26] Pallardy SG, Rhoads JL (1993). Morphological adaptations to drought in seedling of deciduous angiosperms. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23,1766-1774.
[27] Passioura JB (1996). Drought and drought tolerance. Plant Growth Regulation, 20,79-83.
[28] Polle A, Altman A, Jiang XN (2006). Towards genetic engineering for drought tolerance in trees. In: Fladung M, Ewald D eds. Tree Transgenesis: Recent Developments. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 275-297.
[29] Rouhi V, Samson R, Lemeur R, Damme PV (2007). Photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics in three different almond species during drought stress and subsequent recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59,117-129.
[30] Ruiz-Sa′nchez MC, Domingo R, Torrecillas A (2000). Water stress preconditioning to improve drought resistance in young apricot plants. Plant Science, 156,245-251.
[31] Salekdeh GH, Siopongco J, Wade LJ, Ghareyazie B, Bennett J (2002). Proteomic analysis of rice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics, 2,1131-1145.
[32] Sa′nchez-Blanco MJ, Rodr?′guez P, Morales MA, Ortun MF (2002). Comparative growth and water relations of Cistus albidus and Cistus monspeliensis plants during water deficit conditions and recovery. Plant Science, 162,107-113.
[33] Singh B, Singh D (2003). Biomass partitioning and gas exchange in Dalbergia sissoo seedlings under water stress. Photosynthetica, 41,407-414.
[34] Torrecillas A, Guillaume C, Alarcon JJ (1995). Water stress of two tomato species under water stress and recovery. Plant Science, 105,169-176.
[35] Vera-Estrella R, Barkla BJ, Bohnert HJ, Pantoja O (2004). Novel regulation of aquaporins during osmotic stress. Plant Physiology, 135,2318-2329.
[36] Vinocur B, Altman A (2005). Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 16,123-132.
[37] Vogel JC (1993). Variability of carbon isotope fractionation during photosynthesis. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farpuar GD eds. Stable Isotopes and Plant Carbon Water Relations. Academic Press, San Diego, 29-46.
[38] White EH, Abrahamson LP, Gambles P (1988). Experiences with willow as a wood biomass species. In: Klass DL ed. Energy from Biomass and Wastes XII.Institute of Gas Technology, New Orleans, 2,27-44.
[39] Xue S (薛崧), Wang PH (汪沛洪), Xu DQ (许大全), Li LR (李立人) (1992). Effects of water stress on CO2 assimilation of two winter wheat cultivars with different drought resistance. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica (植物生理学报), 8,1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40] Yang JW (杨建伟), Han RL (韩蕊莲), Wei YK (魏宇昆), Sun Q (孙群), Liang ZS (梁宗锁) (2002). Water relation and growth of seabuckthorn and poplar under different soil water content. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica(西北植物学报), 22,579-586. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41] Yang JW (杨建伟), Liang ZS (梁宗锁), Han RL (韩蕊莲), Sun Q (孙群), Cui LJ (崔浪军) (2004). Water use efficiency and water consumption characteristics of poplar under soil drought conditions. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 28,630-636. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42] Yin CY (尹春英), Li CY (李春阳) (2003). Advance in reseach on drought resistance of Populus. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology (应用与环境生态学报), 9,662-668. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43] Zeng FJ(曾凡江), Song X(宋轩) (2000). Study on characteristics of eco-physiology of four poplars in the Cele Oasis. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology (辽宁林业科技), (5),29-31. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44] Zhang J, Marshall J, Jacquish B (1992). Genetic differentiation in carbon isotope discrimination and gas exchange in Pseudotuga menziesii: a common garden experiment. Oecologia, 93,80-87.
[45] Zhang XL, Zhang RG, Li CY (2004). Population difference in physiological and morphological adaptations of Populus davidiana seedlings in response to progressive drought stress. Plant Science, 166,791-797.
[46] Zhao BZ, Kondo M, Maeda M (2004). Water use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in two cultivars of upland rice during different developmental stages under three water regimes. Plant and Soil, 261,61-75.
[47] Chu ZW (褚作旺), Sun Y (孙勇), Guo HY (郭洪印), Guo Q (郭全), Yuan HW (袁洪伟) (2003). Investigations of regeneration of lower yield stand poplar. Protection Forest Science and Technology (防护林科技), (3),31-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Outlines

/

005-264X/bottom_en.htm"-->