Research Articles

Differences in leaf traits and trait correlation networks between karst and non-karst forest tree species

Expand
  • State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

Received date: 2022-11-18

  Accepted date: 2023-03-28

  Online published: 2023-04-20

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(32060330)

Abstract

Aims This study aims to clarify the differences in ecological strategies between karst and non-karst forest tree species, in terms of leaf morphology and anatomy, hydraulics, and mechanical resistance.

Methods A total of 101 tree species were selected from typical karst and non-karst forests in tropical-subtropical regions. We measured: (1) leaf morphological and anatomical traits including leaf thickness (LT), leaf density (LD), vein density and leaf mass per area (LMA); (2) leaf mechanical traits including force to punch and force to tear (Ft); and (3) leaf hydraulic traits including maximum hydraulic conductance (Kleaf_max), cavitation resistance (P50leaf), turgor loss point (Ψtlp), and stomatal safety margin (HSMtlp). We compared the differences in leaf traits between karst and non-karst forest tree species, and analyzed their traits correlation networks.

Important findings (1) Compared to non-karst forest tree species, on average the karst tree species had greater Ft, higher Kleaf_max, lower (more negative) Ψtlp and HSMtlp. (2) Leaf trait network of karst forest tree species showed shorter average path length and diameter and lower edge density than non-karst forest tree species, indicating that traits combinations were closer in karst forests. (3) Mechanical traits and LMA showed high connectedness in the trait networks of karst forest tree species, LT and LD showed high connectedness in those of non-karst tree species. In karst forest tree species, LMA was positively correlated with Ft and negatively correlated with Ψtlp, indicating that increasing leaf carbon investment can simultaneously enhance meachnical resistance and drought tolerance. However, no such correlations were found in non-karst forest tree species. (4) Across karst forests tree species, we found a significant tradeoff between Kleaf_max and P50leaf, both of which were not related with leaf mechanical resistance, and morphological and anatomical traits. By contrast, there was no hydraulic tradeoff in non-karst forest tree species, and Kleaf_max was significantly correlated with LT and LD. This study further reveals that compared to non-karst forest tree species, karst forest tree species tend to exhibit isohydraulic strategy and show closer coordination among leaf traits.

Cite this article

WAN Chun-Yan, YU Jun-Rui, ZHU Shi-Dan . Differences in leaf traits and trait correlation networks between karst and non-karst forest tree species[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023 , 47(10) : 1386 -1397 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0469

References

[1] Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L (2012). The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 15, 393-405.
[2] Blackman CJ, Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ (2010). Leaf hydraulic vulnerability is related to conduit dimensions and drought resistance across a diverse range of woody angiosperms. New Phytologist, 188, 1113-1123.
[3] Blumenthal DM, Mueller KE, Kray JA, Ocheltree TW, Augustine DJ, Wilcox KR (2020). Traits link drought resistance with herbivore defence and plant economics in semi-arid grasslands: the central roles of phenology and leaf dry matter content. Journal of Ecology, 108, 2336-2351.
[4] Chen YJ, Cao KF, Schnitzer SA, Fan ZX, Zhang JL, Bongers F (2015). Water-use advantage for lianas over trees in tropical seasonal forests. New Phytologist, 205, 128-136.
[5] Chen ZC, Wang L, Dai YX, Wan XC, Liu SR (2017). Phenology-dependent variation in the non-structural carbohydrates of broadleaf evergreen species plays an important role in determining tolerance to defoliation (or herbivory). Scientific Reports, 7, 10125. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09757-2.
[6] Deng XB, Tang JW (2010). Chinese Ecosystem Localization Observation and Research Dataset—Volume on Forest Ecosystems: Xishuangbanna Yunnan (1998-2006). China Agriculture Press, Beijing.
[6] [邓晓保, 唐建维 (2010). 中国生态系统定位观测与研究数据集——森林生态系统卷: 云南西双版纳站(1998-2006). 中国农业出版社, 北京.]
[7] Deng Y, Ke J, Wu S, Jiang GH, Jiang ZC, Zhu AJ (2020). Responses of plant water uptake to groundwater depth in limestone outcrops. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125377. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125377.
[8] Ding YL, Nie YP, Chen HS, Wang KL, Querejeta JI (2021). Water uptake depth is coordinated with leaf water potential, water-use efficiency and drought vulnerability in karst vegetation. New Phytologist, 229, 1339-1353.
[9] Feng X, Ackerly DD, Dawson TE, Manzoni S, Mclaughlin B, Skelton RP, Vico G, Weitz AP, Thompson SE (2019). Beyond isohydricity: the role of environmental variability in determining plant drought responses. Plant, Cell & Environment, 42, 1104-1111.
[10] Flores-Moreno H, Fazayeli F, Banerjee A, Datta A, Kattge J, Butler EE, Atkin OK, Wythers K, Chen M, Anand M, Bahn M, Byun C, Cornelissen JHC, Craine J, Gonzalez- Melo A, et al. (2019). Robustness of trait connections across environmental gradients and growth forms. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28, 1806-1826.
[11] Fu PL, Zhu SD, Zhang JL, Finnegan PM, Jiang YJ, Lin H, Fan ZX, Cao KF (2019). The contrasting leaf functional traits between a karst forest and a nearby non-karst forest in south-west China. Functional Plant Biology, 46, 907-915.
[12] Han L, Zhao CZ, Xu T, Feng W, Duan BB (2017). Relationships between leaf thickness and vein traits of Achnatherum splendens under different soil moisture conditions in a flood plain wetland, Heihe River, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41, 529-538.
[12] [韩玲, 赵成章, 徐婷, 冯威, 段贝贝 (2017). 不同土壤水分条件下洪泛平原湿地芨芨草叶片厚度与叶脉性状的关系. 植物生态学报, 41, 529-538.]
[13] He NP, Li Y, Liu CC, Xu L, Li MX, Zhang JH, He JS, Tang ZY, Han XG, Ye Q, Xiao CW, Yu Q, Liu SR, Sun W, Niu SL, et al. (2020). Plant trait networks: improved resolution of the dimensionality of adaptation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35, 908-918.
[14] Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 50, 346-363.
[15] Hua L, He PC, Goldstein G, Liu H, Yin D, Zhu SD, Ye Q (2020). Linking vein properties to leaf biomechanics across 58 woody species from a subtropical forest. Plant Biology, 22, 212-220.
[16] Huang QH, Cai YL (2009). Mapping karst rock in southwest China. Mountain Research and Development, 29, 14-20.
[17] Huang YQ, Li XK, Zhang ZF, He CX, Zhao P, You YM, Mo L (2011). Seasonal changes in Cyclobalanopsis glauca transpiration and canopy stomatal conductance and their dependence on subterranean water and climatic factors in rocky karst terrain. Journal of Hydrology, 402, 135-143.
[18] Jin Y, Wang CK (2016). Leaf hydraulic traits and their trade- offs for nine Chinese temperate tree species with different wood properties. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 40, 702-710.
[18] [金鹰, 王传宽 (2016). 九种不同材性的温带树种叶水力性状及其权衡关系. 植物生态学报, 40, 702-710.]
[19] John GP, Scoffoni C, Buckley TN, Villar R, Poorter H, Sack L (2017). The anatomical and compositional basis of leaf mass per area. Ecology Letters, 20, 412-425.
[20] Kleyer M, Trinogga J, Cebrián-Piqueras MA, Trenkamp A, Fl?jgaard C, Ejrn?s R, Bouma TJ, Minden V, Maier M, Mantilla-Contreras J, Albach DC, Blasius B (2019). Trait correlation network analysis identifies biomass allocation traits and stem specific length as hub traits in herbaceous perennial plants. Journal of Ecology, 107, 829-842.
[21] Kumagai T, Porporato A (2012). Strategies of a Bornean tropical rainforest water use as a function of rainfall regime: isohydric or anisohydric? Plant, Cell & Environment, 35, 61-71.
[22] Lamont BB, Groom PK, Williams M, He TH (2015). LMA, density and thickness: recognizing different leaf shapes and correcting for their nonlaminarity. New Phytologist, 207, 942-947.
[23] Li L, McCormack ML, Ma CG, Kong DL, Zhang Q, Chen XY, Zeng H, Niinemets ü, Guo DL (2015). Leaf economics and hydraulic traits are decoupled in five species-rich tropical-subtropical forests. Ecology Letters, 18, 899-906.
[24] Liu CC, Li Y, He NP (2022). Differential adaptation of lianas and trees in wet and dry forests revealed by trait correlation networks. Ecological Indicators, 135, 108564. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108564.
[25] Liu MX, Xu XL, Wang DB, Sun AY, Wang KL (2016). Karst catchments exhibited higher degradation stress from climate change than the non-karst catchments in southwest China: an ecohydrological perspective. Journal of Hydrology, 535, 173-180.
[26] Marini L, Ayres MP, Battisti A, Faccoli M (2012). Climate affects severity and altitudinal distribution of outbreaks in an eruptive bark beetle. Climatic Change, 115, 327-341.
[27] Markesteijn L, Poorter L, Bongers F, Paz H, Sack L (2011). Hydraulics and life history of tropical dry forest tree species: coordination of species’ drought and shade tolerance. New Phytologist, 191, 480-495.
[28] Martin-StPaul N, Delzon S, Cochard H (2017). Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure. Ecology Letters, 20, 1437-1447.
[29] McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, Yepez EA (2008). Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist, 178, 719-739.
[30] Méndez-Alonzo R, Ewers FW, Jacobsen AL, Pratt RB, Scoffoni C, Bartlett MK, Sack L (2019). Covariation between leaf hydraulics and biomechanics is driven by leaf density in Mediterranean shrubs. Trees, 33, 507-519.
[31] Nardini A, Pedà G, Rocca NL (2012). Trade-offs between leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: morpho- anatomical bases, carbon costs and ecological consequences. New Phytologist, 196, 788-798.
[32] Ogburn RM, Edwards EJ (2012). Quantifying succulence: a rapid, physiologically meaningful metric of plant water storage. Plant, Cell & Environment, 35, 1533-1542.
[33] Oliveira RS, Eller CB, Barros FdV, Hirota M, Brum M, Bittencourt P (2021). Linking plant hydraulics and the fast-slow continuum to understand resilience to drought in tropical ecosystems. New Phytologist, 230, 904-923.
[34] Onoda Y, Westoby M, Adler PB, Choong AMF, Clissold FJ, Cornelissen JHC, Díaz S, Dominy NJ, Elgart A, Enrico L, Fine PVA, Howard JJ, Jalili A, Kitajima K, Kurokawa H, et al. (2011). Global patterns of leaf mechanical properties. Ecology Letters, 14, 301-312.
[35] Poorter H, Lambers H, Evans JR (2014). Trait correlation networks: a whole-plant perspective on the recently criticized leaf economic spectrum. New Phytologist, 201, 378-382.
[36] Powers JS, Vargas GG, Brodribb TJ, Schwartz NB, Pérez-Aviles D, Smith-Martin CM, Becknell JM, Aureli F, Blanco R, Calderón-Morales E, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Calvo-Obando AJ, Chavarría MM, Carvajal-Vanegas D, Jiménez-Rodríguez CD, et al. (2020). A catastrophic tropical drought kills hydraulically vulnerable tree species. Global Change Biology, 26, 3122-3133.
[37] Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11001-11006.
[38] Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM (2003). The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 1343-1356.
[39] Sack L, Frole K (2006). Leaf structural diversity is related to hydraulic capacity in tropical rain forest trees. Ecology, 87, 483-491.
[40] Sack L, Scoffoni C (2013). Leaf venation: structure, function, development, evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future. New Phytologist, 198, 983-1000.
[41] Sade N, Gebremedhin A, Moshelion M (2012). Risk-taking plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 7, 767-770.
[42] Sanchez-Martinez P, Martínez-Vilalta J, Dexter KG, Segovia RA, Mencuccini M (2020). Adaptation and coordinated evolution of plant hydraulic traits. Ecology Letters, 23, 1599-1610.
[43] Scoffoni C, Rawls M, Mckown A, Cochard H, Sack L (2011). Decline of leaf hydraulic conductance with dehydration: relationship to leaf size and venation architecture. Plant Physiology, 156, 832-843.
[44] Scoffoni C, Vuong C, Diep S, Cochard H, Sack L (2014). Leaf shrinkage with dehydration: coordination with hydraulic vulnerability and drought tolerance. Plant Physiology, 164, 1772-1788.
[45] Shipley B, Lechowicz MJ, Wright I, Reich PB (2006). Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Ecology, 87, 535-541.
[46] Song TQ (2015). Plants and the Environment in Karst Areas of Southwest China. Science Press, Beijing.
[46] [宋同清 (2015). 西南喀斯特植物与环境. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[47] Song TQ, Peng WX, Zeng FP, Wang KL, Qin WG, Tan WN, Liu L, Du H, Lu SY (2010). Spatial pattern of forest communities and environmental interpretation in Mulun national nature reserve, karst cluster-peak depression region. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 298-308.
[47] [宋同清, 彭晚霞, 曾馥平, 王克林, 覃文更, 谭卫宁, 刘璐, 杜虎, 鹿士杨 (2010). 木论喀斯特峰丛洼地森林群落空间格局及环境解释. 植物生态学报, 34, 298-308.]
[48] Tang SB, Liu JF, Lambers H, Zhang LL, Liu ZF, Lin YT, Kuang YW (2021). Increase in leaf organic acids to enhance adaptability of dominant plant species in karst habitats. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 10277-10289.
[49] Wei Y, Liu H, He PC, Liu XR, Ye Q (2022). Coordination between leaf construction cost and mechanical resistance of dominant woody species in subtropical forests at different successional stages. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 30, 483-491.
[49] [韦伊, 刘慧, 贺鹏程, 刘小容, 叶清 (2022). 南亚热带不同演替阶段森林优势树种叶片构建成本与机械抗性的协同关系. 热带亚热带植物学报, 30, 483-491.]
[50] Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, et al. (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821-827.
[51] Yan CL, Ni MY, Cao KF, Zhu SD (2020). Leaf hydraulic safety margin and safety-efficiency trade-off across angiosperm woody species. Biology Letters, 16, 20200456. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0456.
[52] Yao GQ, Nie ZF, Turner NC, Li FM, Gao TP, Fang XW, Scoffoni C (2021). Combined high leaf hydraulic safety and efficiency provides drought tolerance in Caragana species adapted to low mean annual precipitation. New Phytologist, 229, 230-244.
[53] Yuan DX (1992). Karst in southwest China and its comparison with karst in north China. Quaternary Science, 12, 352-361.
[53] [袁道先 (1992). 中国西南部的岩溶及其与华北岩溶的对比. 第四纪研究, 12, 352-361.]
[54] Zhang QM (2011). Chinese Ecosystem Localization Observation and Research Dataset—Volume on Forest Ecosystems: Dinghu, Guangdong (1998-2008). China Agriculture Press, Beijing.
[54] [张倩媚 (2011). 中国生态系统定位观测与研究数据集——森林生态系统卷: 广东鼎湖山站(1998-2008). 中国农业出版社, 北京.]
[55] Zhang QW, Zhu SD, Jansen S, Cao KF (2021). Topography strongly affects drought stress and xylem embolism re- sistance in woody plants from a karst forest in Southwest China. Functional Ecology, 35, 566-577.
[56] Zhang YB, Zhou CY, Lv WQ, Dai LH, Tang JG, Zhou SQ, Huang LH, Li AD, Zhang JL (2019). Comparative study of the stoichiometric characteristics of karst and non-karst forests in Guizhou, China. Journal of Forestry Research, 30, 799-806.
[57] Zhu H (2007). The karst ecosystem of southern China and its biodiversity. Tropical Forestry, 35, 44-47.
[57] [朱华 (2007). 中国南方石灰岩(喀斯特)生态系统及生物多样性特征. 热带林业, 35, 44-47.]
[58] Zhu SD, Chen YJ, Fu PL, Cao KF (2017). Different hydraulic traits of woody plants from tropical forests with contrasting soil water availability. Tree Physiology, 37, 1469-1477.
Outlines

/