Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 30-38.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00030

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Plant species-area relationship in a 42-hm2 research plot of coniferous and board-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province, China

JIANG Jun, ZHANG Chun-Yu, and ZHAO Xiu-Hai*   

  1. Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2011-04-28 Revised:2011-11-15 Online:2012-01-05 Published:2012-01-01
  • Contact: ZHAO Xiu-Hai E-mail:zhaoxh@bjfu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Aims The Species Area Relationship (SAR) is a fundamental pattern in ecology. Recent analyses have often demonstrated substantial uncertainty in selecting the best SAR model for a data set. Our objective was to understand the effects of sample design on species-area relations, in order to suggest a more appropriate SAR model for the given plot data.
Methods A long-term 42 hm2 forest plot was established in conifer and board-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, China. All trees with diameter at breast height (DBH) > 1 cm were tagged and their height, DBH and crown diameter recorded. We propose three SARs models (logarithmic function, power function and logistic function) to compare SARs constructed from nested design and random design. We use Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to compare the quality fit of each SAR model given the data.
Important findings The way of constructing SARs influences the outcome. The random design showed significantly better goodness of fit of SARs model than the nested design. Among the three SAR models, Logistic function model from the random design was the best, suggesting it provided a reasonable description of the species-area relationship in the plot. This study demonstrates the significance of scale variance in species-area relationships; the effects of area on species richness are variable and can be scale dependent. However, because the species distribution patterns and spatial scale vary greatly, further work is needed to consider environmental effects and the community succession on different spatial scales.

[1]Arrhenius O(1921).Species and area.Journal of Ecology,9:95-99
[2]Anderson DR.(1994).AIC model selection in over dispersed capture-recapture data.Ecology,75:1780-1793
[3]Andrew PA(2003).Effects of range size on species-area relationships.Evolutionary Ecology Research,5:493-499
[4]Bartha S, Ittzes P(2001).Local richness–species pool ratio: a consequence of the species–area relationship.Folia Geobotanica,36:9-23
[5]Cain SA(1938).The species area curve.The American Midland Naturalist,19:573-581
[6]Connor EF, McCoy ED(1979).The statistics and biology of the species–area relationship.The American Naturalist,113:791-833
[7]Condit R(1996).Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots.Journal of Ecology,84:549-562
[8]Edward FC(2001). Species area relations.Encyclopedia of Biodiversity,5:-
[9]Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB(1943).The relationship between the number of species and the number of individual in a random sample of an animal population.Journal of Animal Ecology,12:42-58
[10]Fattorini(2005).To fit or not to fit? An inappropriate fitting procedure produces in consistent results when the species area relationship is used to locate hot spots.Biodivers Conserv,:-
[11]Gleason HA(1925).Species and area.Ecology,6:66-74
[12]Guilhaumon F(2008). Taxonomic and regional uncertainty in species-area relationships and the identification of richness hotspots.PNAS,105(40):-
[13]Gleason HA(1922).On the relation between species and area.Ecology,3:158-162
[14]Hill JL(1995).The effect of sampling on the species-area curve.Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters,4:97-106
[15]He F, Legendre P(1996).On species-area relations.The American Naturalist,148:719-737
[16]He F, Legendre P(2002).Species diversity patterns derived from species-area models.Ecology,83:1185-1198
[17]Harte J(2009).Biodiversity scales from plots to biomes with a universal species-area curve.Ecology Letters,12:789-797
[18]Hao ZQ (郝占庆), Li BH (李步杭), Zhang J (张健), Wang XG (王绪高), Ye J (叶吉), Yao XL (姚晓琳)(2008).Broad-leaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) mixed forest plot in Changbaishan (CBS) of China: community composition and structure.Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报),32:238-250
[19]Inouye RS(1998).Species–area curves and estimates of total species richness in an old field chronosequence.Plant Ecology,137:31-40
[20]Jurgen Dengler(2009).Which function describes the species area relationship best?A review and empirical evaluation..Journal of Biogeography,36:728-744
[21]Kallimanis A S, Mazaris AD, Tzanopoulos J, Halley JM, Pantis JD, Sgardelis SP(2008).How does habitat diversity affect the species–area relationship.Global Ecology and Bio-geography,17:532-538
[22]Kilburn PD(1963).Exponential values for the species–area relation..Science,14(1276):-
[23]Michael WP (1994). Scale dependence and the species-area relationships. American Naturalist, 144:717-740
[24]Ricotta C(2005).An asymptotic fractal model for logistic species-area curves.Community Ecology,6:109-114
[25]Scheiner SM(2003).Six types of species area curves.Global Ecology and Biogeography,12:441-447
[26]Scheiner S(2007).Evaluation of species-area functions using Sonoran Desert plant data: Not all species-area curves are power functions.Oikos,116:1930-1940
[27]Smith AB(2010).Caution with curves: Caveats for using the species-area relationship in conservation.Biological Conservation,143:555-564
[28]Tj?rve E(2009).Shapes and functions of species-area curves (II): A review of new models and parameterizations.Journal of Biogeography,36:1435-1445
[29]Ulrich W(2007).Sampling design and the shape of species-area curves on the regional scale.Acta Oecologica,31:54-59
[30]Usher MB(1979).Changes in the species–area relations of higher plant of nature reserves.Journal of Applied Ecology,16:213-215
[31]Ugland KI, Gray JS, Ellingsen KE(2003).The species–accumulation curve and estimation of species richness.Journal of Animal Ecology,72:888-897
[32]Wu ZY(吴征镒)(1991).The areal-type of the world families of seed plants.云南植物研究,4:1-139
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] How Foon-Chew, Ho Chun-Nien. Rhizophoraceae in the Chinese Flora[J]. J Syst Evol, 1952, 2(2): 133 -158 .
[2] Wang Shu-bo. Two New Species of Genus Giffordia from China[J]. J Syst Evol, 1994, 32(4): 375 -377 .
[3] Ying Tsün-Shen. On Dysosma Woodson and Sinopodophyllum Ying, gen. nov. of the Berberidaceae[J]. J Syst Evol, 1979, 17(1): 15 -23 .
[4] JI MIng-Yue, ZHANG Nan, YAN Qi, WEN Bin. Storage Behavior Characteristics of Recalcitrant Podocarpus nagi Seeds*[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(01): 63 -70 .
[5] JING Ping-Fei, WU Kun-Yi, GONG Ye, HAN Li-Min, CUI Lang-Jun. Prediction of Potential Geological Distribution of Asarum in China by Maxent Model[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(03): 349 -356 .
[6] Danlong Jing, Jiang Ma, Bo Zhang, Yiyang Han, Zhixiong Liu, Faju Chen. Expression Analysis of MwAG in Different Organs and Developmental Stages of Magnolia wufengensis[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2013, 48(2): 145 -150 .
[7] Puqing Song, Jing Zhang, Longshan Lin, Zhangcheng Xu, Xiaoming Zhu. Nekton species composition and biodiversity in Taiwan Strait[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2012, 20(1): 32 -40 .
[8] Ruiyu Liu. Progress of marine biodiversity studies in China seas[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2011, 19(6): 614 -626 .
[9] GE Yong-Qi, QIU Ying-Xiong, DING Bing-Yang, FU Cheng-Xin. An ISSR analysis on population genetic diversity of the relict plant Ginkgo biloba[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2003, 11(4): 276 -287 .
[10] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1998, 15(专辑): 35 -38 .