• •    

宁夏罗山典型灌丛群落土壤种子库与地上植被关系研究

李元培, 刘佳嘉, 马圆   

  1. 宁夏大学林业与草业学院, 宁夏回族自治区 750000 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-16 修回日期:2025-08-30

Study on the relationship between soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation in a typical shrub community in Luoshan, Ningxia

LI Yuanpei, LIU Jiajia, MA Yuan   

  1. , 750000, China
  • Received:2025-06-16 Revised:2025-08-30

摘要: 为研究不同灌木群落土壤种子库及其地上植被群落和环境特征,在分析地上植被群落、土壤种子库基本特征、土壤种子库与地上植被的关系等的基础上,对土壤种子库生态修复潜力进行综合评价。本项研究以宁夏罗山保护区为研究区域,设置6个典型灌木群落样地,采取野外调查取样、萌发实验相结合的办法。在对六大典型灌木群落中的植物进行统计后,结果显示共有82个种类,涉及31个科,64个属。其中,菊科、豆科与蔷薇科是拥有最多物种的三个科系,它们主要包含多年生草本类,其次为灌木类以及少量一年生的植物类型。地上植被在诸多层面如植物种类和数量上优于土壤种子库,而后者则表现出更为显著的物种数量分布不均衡现象。土壤种子库中的一年生植物种比例远超地上植被,而灌木植物种比例则相对较少。调查发现在6个典型灌木植被样地中随着土层加深,各植物群落土壤种子库密度与物种数均呈下降趋势。通过生态恢复潜力综合评价分析得出虎榛子生态系统生态修复潜力为较强,其他四个生态系统的生态修复潜力均为中等。综合来看,这六类灌木群落在恢复植被种源中虽有贡献,然而贡献程度相对有限。因此,在展开植被恢复工作时,需针对目标区域植被特点制定精巧的规划与方案,同时精确掌握播种量数值,以确保土壤种子库中的种子资源能较好地满足植被恢复目标。

关键词: 土壤种子库, 地上植被, 典型灌丛群落, 生态修复潜力

Abstract: Aims The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of soil seed banks in typical shrub communities in Luoshan, Ningxia, and their relationship with aboveground vegetation. The study also evaluates the ecological restoration potential of soil seed banks and clarifies their role in vegetation restoration. Methods In this study, six typical shrub community sample plots were set up in Luoshan Nature Reserve of Ningxia Province, and the method of field investigation and sampling and germination experiment was adopted. Important finding A study found that a total of 82 plant species belonging to 31 families and 64 genera were counted in the aboveground vegetation of 6 typical shrub groups. The life form of the species is mainly composed of perennial herbaceous plants, followed by shrubs, and the proportion of annual plants is relatively low; The species richness of the tiger hazelnut community is the highest and the distribution is relatively uniform, while the species richness of the thorn spiral flower community is the lowest and the distribution is uneven. There are a total of 43 plant species in the soil seed bank of 6 typical shrub communities, belonging to 17 families and 35 genera. The life forms of these plants are mainly perennial herbs. The density range of soil seed banks for 6 plant communities is 1033.33 ± 57.74 (grains/m2) -7000.00 ± 200 (grains/m2). The soil seed density is highest in the community of mutual leaved drunken fish grass, and lowest in the community of spiny spiral flowers; Most of the seeds in each plant community are concentrated in the 0-10cm soil layer. As the soil layer deepens, the density and number of species in the soil seed bank of each plant community show a decreasing trend; Overall, the species diversity index of the tiger hazelnut and mutual leaved drunken fish grass communities is the highest, while the thorn spiral flower community is the lowest. The vegetation on the ground of six typical shrub groups is higher in terms of plant species and quantity than in the soil seed bank, and the uneven distribution of plant species in the soil seed bank is more pronounced than in the above ground vegetation. The similarity between aboveground vegetation and soil seed banks in various plant communities is relatively low, with a similarity index range of 0.286-0.444. The evaluation of the ecological restoration potential of soil seed banks shows that the ecological restoration potential of the tiger hazelnut community is strong, while the ecological restoration potential of the other five typical shrub communities is moderate. Overall, although soil seed banks provide a certain source of seeds in vegetation restoration, relying solely on natural seed banks is not sufficient to fully meet the ecological restoration needs. In the actual production process, corresponding restoration measures need to be adopted based on the characteristics of different plant communities, and moderate human regulation should be carried out to promote community succession in the direction of progress or increasing biomass.

Key words: soil seed banks, above-ground vegetation, Typical shrub community;Ecological restoration potential