植物生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 816-824.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00816
收稿日期:
2011-03-09
接受日期:
2011-05-13
出版日期:
2011-03-09
发布日期:
2011-07-28
通讯作者:
吕光辉
作者简介:
**E-mail: lvguanghui638@sina.comYANG Xiao-Dong1,2(), LÜ Guang-Hui1,2,**()
Received:
2011-03-09
Accepted:
2011-05-13
Online:
2011-03-09
Published:
2011-07-28
Contact:
Lü Guang-Hui
摘要:
根据对新疆艾比湖湿地自然保护区荒漠河岸林的主要建群种胡杨(Populus euphratica)的根系分布特征, 林冠下土壤的饱和容积含水量、最大导水率和根系最大导水率的试验观测数据, 以及对其林冠下5层不同深度土壤容积含水量、土壤水势的动态监测数据, 构建了胡杨根系水分再分配量估算的Ryel模型, 并对胡杨不同季节的水分再分配过程进行了短期模拟。结果表明: (1)胡杨根系水分再分配过程的水分再分配量的最大值出现在艾比湖地方时间凌晨2:30。(2)随着生长季节的变化, 胡杨根系水分再分配的作用逐渐减弱, 并表现出向土壤下层迁移的现象。6月份, 水分再分配过程主要发生在0-40 cm土层, 最大分配量为0.022 0 cm, 夜间总分配量为0.111 0 cm; 8月份水分再分配过程主要发生在10-70 cm土层, 最大分配量为0.006 5 cm, 夜间总分配量为0.018 4 cm; 10月份水分再分配过程主要发生在70-100 cm土层, 最大分配量为0.003 9 cm, 夜间总分配量为0.008 6 cm。
杨晓东, 吕光辉. 新疆艾比湖湿地自然保护区胡杨根系水分再分配的估算. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(8): 816-824. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00816
YANG Xiao-Dong, LÜ Guang-Hui. Estimation of hydraulic redistribution ofPopulus euphratica in Ebinur Lake Wetland Nature Reserve in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(8): 816-824. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00816
土层 Soil layer (cm) | 活跃根系比例 Active root proportion |
---|---|
0-10 | 0.493 |
10-40 | 0.497 |
40-70 | 0.499 |
70-100 | 0.500 |
100-150 | 0.501 |
表1 胡杨林冠下5层土壤中活跃根系比例
Table 1 Active root proportion in five soil layers under the canopy of Populus euphratica
土层 Soil layer (cm) | 活跃根系比例 Active root proportion |
---|---|
0-10 | 0.493 |
10-40 | 0.497 |
40-70 | 0.499 |
70-100 | 0.500 |
100-150 | 0.501 |
土层 Soil layer (cm) | 饱和容积含水量 Saturated volumetric water content (cm3·cm-3) | 剩余容积含水量 Residual volumetric water content (cm3·cm-3) |
---|---|---|
0-10 | 0.29 | 0.073 |
10-40 | 0.36 | 0.066 |
40-70 | 0.41 | 0.067 |
70-100 | 0.40 | 0.067 |
100-150 | 0.34 | 0.063 |
表2 胡杨林冠下5层土壤的饱和容积含水量和剩余容积含水量
Table 2 Saturated and residual volumetric water contents in five soil layers under the canopy of Populus euphratica
土层 Soil layer (cm) | 饱和容积含水量 Saturated volumetric water content (cm3·cm-3) | 剩余容积含水量 Residual volumetric water content (cm3·cm-3) |
---|---|---|
0-10 | 0.29 | 0.073 |
10-40 | 0.36 | 0.066 |
40-70 | 0.41 | 0.067 |
70-100 | 0.40 | 0.067 |
100-150 | 0.34 | 0.063 |
图2 8月份胡杨林冠下0-10 cm土层的土壤水势及相对根际导度。
Fig. 2 Soil water potential and the relative conductance of roots in 0-10 cm soil layer under the canopy of Populus euphratica in August.
6月 June | 8月 August | 10月 October | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土层 Soil layer (cm) | Ψ50 (MPa) | 土层 Soil layer (cm) | Ψ50 (MPa) | 土层 Soil layer (cm) | Ψ50 (MPa) | ||
0-10 | -2.45 | 0-10 | -0.33 | 0-10 | -0.13 | ||
10-40 | -1.60 | 10-40 | -2.16 | 10-40 | -0.26 | ||
40-70 | -0.46 | 40-70 | -1.86 | 40-70 | -0.58 | ||
70-100 | -1.20 | 70-100 | -1.33 | 70-100 | -2.00 | ||
100-150 | -0.40 | 100-150 | -2.40 | 100-150 | -1.60 |
表3 胡杨林冠下5层土壤的相对根际导度降低50%时的土壤水势值(Ψ50)
Table 3 Soil water potential (Ψ50) of five soil layers under the canopy of Populus euphratica while relative conductance of roots was reduced by 50%
6月 June | 8月 August | 10月 October | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土层 Soil layer (cm) | Ψ50 (MPa) | 土层 Soil layer (cm) | Ψ50 (MPa) | 土层 Soil layer (cm) | Ψ50 (MPa) | ||
0-10 | -2.45 | 0-10 | -0.33 | 0-10 | -0.13 | ||
10-40 | -1.60 | 10-40 | -2.16 | 10-40 | -0.26 | ||
40-70 | -0.46 | 40-70 | -1.86 | 40-70 | -0.58 | ||
70-100 | -1.20 | 70-100 | -1.33 | 70-100 | -2.00 | ||
100-150 | -0.40 | 100-150 | -2.40 | 100-150 | -1.60 |
时间 Time | 净再分配水总量 Total amount of net water redistribution (cm) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-10 cm 土层 0-10 cm soil layer | 10-40 cm 土层 10-40 cm soil layer | 40-70 cm 土层 40-70 cm soil layer | 70-100 cm土层 70-100 cm soil layer | ||||||
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
19:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
21:30 | -0.006 0 | 0.002 0 | -0.000 5 | -0.000 4 | |||||
23:30 | -0.006 3 | 0.004 4 | -0.001 3 | -0.001 9 | |||||
2:30 | -0.019 5 | 0.006 3 | 0.000 0 | -0.002 5 | |||||
6:30 | -0.035 4 | 0.010 1 | 0.000 7 | -0.003 6 | |||||
8:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
11:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
19:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
21:30 | -0.011 0 | 0.003 3 | 0.001 3 | -0.002 2 | |||||
23:30 | -0.022 7 | 0.007 6 | 0.003 3 | -0.005 4 | |||||
2:30 | -0.035 3 | 0.009 7 | 0.005 4 | -0.007 5 | |||||
6:30 | -0.045 8 | 0.012 7 | 0.005 7 | -0.008 7 | |||||
8:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
11:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
表5 8月胡杨林冠下5层土壤的根系净再分配水总量
Table 5 Total amount of net water redistribution in five soil layers under the canopy of Populus euphratica in August
时间 Time | 净再分配水总量 Total amount of net water redistribution (cm) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-10 cm 土层 0-10 cm soil layer | 10-40 cm 土层 10-40 cm soil layer | 40-70 cm 土层 40-70 cm soil layer | 70-100 cm土层 70-100 cm soil layer | ||||||
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
19:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
21:30 | -0.006 0 | 0.002 0 | -0.000 5 | -0.000 4 | |||||
23:30 | -0.006 3 | 0.004 4 | -0.001 3 | -0.001 9 | |||||
2:30 | -0.019 5 | 0.006 3 | 0.000 0 | -0.002 5 | |||||
6:30 | -0.035 4 | 0.010 1 | 0.000 7 | -0.003 6 | |||||
8:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
11:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
19:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
21:30 | -0.011 0 | 0.003 3 | 0.001 3 | -0.002 2 | |||||
23:30 | -0.022 7 | 0.007 6 | 0.003 3 | -0.005 4 | |||||
2:30 | -0.035 3 | 0.009 7 | 0.005 4 | -0.007 5 | |||||
6:30 | -0.045 8 | 0.012 7 | 0.005 7 | -0.008 7 | |||||
8:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
11:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
时间 Time | 净再分配水总量 Total amount of net water redistribution (cm) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0-10 cm 土层 0-10 cm soil layer | 10-40 cm 土层 10-40 cm soil layer | 40-70 cm 土层 40-70 cm soil layer | 70-100 cm土层 70-100 cm soil layer | |
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
19:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
21:30 | -0.009 7 | -0.001 9 | -0.001 4 | 0.002 2 |
23:30 | -0.019 1 | -0.004 4 | -0.002 5 | 0.004 4 |
2:30 | -0.028 3 | -0.004 9 | -0.004 3 | 0.006 4 |
6:30 | -0.040 2 | -0.006 6 | -0.005 5 | 0.008 6 |
8:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
11:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
19:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
21:30 | -0.008 9 | -0.000 1 | -0.001 9 | 0.001 7 |
23:30 | -0.018 8 | -0.001 9 | -0.003 3 | 0.003 8 |
2:30 | -0.029 8 | -0.004 0 | -0.005 1 | 0.006 2 |
6:30 | -0.041 4 | -0.006 0 | -0.006 2 | 0.008 4 |
8:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
11:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
表6 10月胡杨林冠下5层土壤的根系净再分配水总量
Table 6 Total amount of net water redistribution in five soil layers under the canopy of Populus euphratica in October
时间 Time | 净再分配水总量 Total amount of net water redistribution (cm) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0-10 cm 土层 0-10 cm soil layer | 10-40 cm 土层 10-40 cm soil layer | 40-70 cm 土层 40-70 cm soil layer | 70-100 cm土层 70-100 cm soil layer | |
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
19:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
21:30 | -0.009 7 | -0.001 9 | -0.001 4 | 0.002 2 |
23:30 | -0.019 1 | -0.004 4 | -0.002 5 | 0.004 4 |
2:30 | -0.028 3 | -0.004 9 | -0.004 3 | 0.006 4 |
6:30 | -0.040 2 | -0.006 6 | -0.005 5 | 0.008 6 |
8:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
11:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
19:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
21:30 | -0.008 9 | -0.000 1 | -0.001 9 | 0.001 7 |
23:30 | -0.018 8 | -0.001 9 | -0.003 3 | 0.003 8 |
2:30 | -0.029 8 | -0.004 0 | -0.005 1 | 0.006 2 |
6:30 | -0.041 4 | -0.006 0 | -0.006 2 | 0.008 4 |
8:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
11:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
15:30 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[1] | Alamusa (阿拉木萨), Zhou LF (周丽芳)(2011). Empirical test of hydraulic lift in 21 plant species in the Horqin sandy land, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 33(1),70-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] |
Baker JM, van Bavel CHM (1988). Water transfer through cotton from connecting soil regions of differing water potential. Agronomy Journal, 80,993-997.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Brooks JR, Meinzer FC, Coulombe R, Gregg J (2002). Hydraulic redistribution of soil water during summer drought in two contrasting Pacific Northwest coniferous forests. Tree Physiology, 22,1107-1117.
URL PMID |
[4] |
Brooks JR, Meinzer FC, Warren JM, Domec JC, Coulombe R (2006). Hydraulic redistribution in a Douglas-fir forest: lessons from system manipulations. Plant, Cell & Environment, 29,138-150.
DOI URL PMID |
[5] |
Burgess SSO, Adams MA, Bleby TM (2000a). Measurement of sap flow in roots of woody plants: a commentary. Tree Physiology, 20,909-913.
URL PMID |
[6] |
Burgess SSO, Adams MA, Turner NC, Ong CK (1998). The redistribution of soil water by tree root systems. Oecologia, 115,306-311.
URL PMID |
[7] |
Burgess SSO, Adams MA, Turner NC, White DA, Ong CK (2001). Tree roots: conduits for deep recharge of soil water. Oecologia, 126,158-165.
DOI URL PMID |
[8] |
Burgess SSO, Pate JS, Adams MA, Dawson TE (2000b). Seasonal water acquisition and redistribution in the Australian woody phreatophyte, Banksia prionotes. Annals of Botany, 85,215-224.
DOI URL |
[9] |
Caldwell MM, Dawson TE, Richards JH (1998). Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia, 113,151-161.
URL PMID |
[10] |
Caldwell MM, Richards JH (1989). Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia, 79,1-5.
URL PMID |
[11] | Chen YM (陈亚明), Fu H (傅华), Zhang R (张荣), Wan CG (万长贵) (2004). The present situation and prospect of researches on hydraulic redistribution between the interface of root and soil. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 24,1040-1047. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] |
Corak SJ, Blevins DG, Pallardy SG (1987). Water transfer in an alfalfa/maize association-survival of maize during drought. Plant Physiology, 84,582-586.
URL PMID |
[13] |
da Rocha HR, Goulden ML, Miller SD, Menton MC, Pinto LDVO, de Freitas HC, Figueira AMS (2004). Seasonality of water and heat fluxes over a tropical forest in eastern Amazonia. Ecological Applications, 14,22-32.
DOI URL |
[14] | Fan XL (樊小林), Cao XH (曹新华), Guo LB (郭立彬), Qin FL (秦芳玲) (1996). Hydraulic lift (HL) and its effect on soil water potential and nutrient availability. II. Effect of the interaction of soil water and nutrients and hydraulic lift on the plant growth. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation (土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报), 2(4),71-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Fan XL (樊小林), Li SX (李生秀) (1997). Hydraulic lift of plant root system. Acta Universitatis Agriculturalis Boredi- Occidentalis (西北农业大学学报), 25(5),75-81. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Guan XJ (管秀娟), Zhao SW (赵世伟) (1999). The evidence and significances of hydraulic lift in plant roots. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 19,746-754. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] |
Hacker SD, Bertness MD (1995). Morphological and physiological consequences of a positive plant interactions. Ecology, 76,2165-2175.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Hao XM (郝兴明), Chen YN (陈亚宁), Li WH (李卫红), Guo B (郭斌), Zhao RF (赵锐锋) (2009). Evidence and ecological effects of hydraulic lift in Populus euphratica. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 33,1125-1131. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[19] | He WM (何维明), Zhang XS (张新时) (2001). Water sharing in the roots of four shrubs of the Mu Us Sandy Desert. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,630-633. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] |
Horton JL, Hart SC (1998). Hydraulic lift: a potentially important ecosystem process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13,232-235.
URL PMID |
[21] |
Hultine KR, Cable WL, Burgess SSO, Williams DG (2003). Hydraulic redistribution by deep roots of a Chihuahuan Desert phreatophyte. Tree Physiology, 23,353-360.
DOI URL PMID |
[22] |
Hultine KR, Scott RL, Cable WL, Goodrich DC, Williams DG (2004). Hydraulic redistribution by a dominant, warm- desert phreatophyte: seasonal patterns and response to precipitation pulses. Functional Ecology, 18,530-538.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringel JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996). A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia, 108,389-411.
URL PMID |
[24] |
Jackson RB, Sperry JS, Dawson TE (2000). Root water uptake and transport: using physiological processes in global predictions. Trends in Plant Science, 5,482-488.
URL PMID |
[25] |
Lee JE, Olive RS, Dawson TE, Fung I (2005). Root functioning modifies seasonal climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102,17576-17581.
URL PMID |
[26] |
Leffler AJ, Peek MS, Ryel RJ, Ivans CY, Caldwell MM (2005). Hydraulic redistribution through the root systems of senesced plants. Ecology, 86,633-642.
DOI URL |
[27] | Li W (李唯), Ni Y (倪郁), Hu ZZ (胡自治), Li S (李胜) (2003). Review oil studies of hydraulic lift in root system. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 23,1056-1062. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Liu JS (刘峻杉), Gao Q (高琼), Zhu YJ (朱玉洁), Wang K (王昆) (2007). Hydraulic redistribution: newly recognized small cycle within the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 31,794-803. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] |
Ludwig F, Dawson TE, de Kroon H, Berendse F, Prins HHT (2003). Hydraulic lift in Acacia tortilis trees on an East African savanna . Oecologia, 134,293-300.
DOI URL PMID |
[30] |
Ludwig F, Dawson TE, Prins HHT, Berendse F,de Kroon H (2004). Below-ground competition between trees and grasses may overwhelm the facilitative effects of hydraulic lift. Ecology Letters, 7,623-631.
DOI URL |
[31] |
Oliveira RS, Dawson TE, Burgess SSO, Nepstad DC (2005). Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees. Oecologia, 145,354-363.
URL PMID |
[32] |
Prieto I, Martínez-Tillería K, Martínez-Manchego L, Montecinos S, Pugnaire FI, Squeo FA (2010). Hydraulic lift through transpiration suppression in shrubs from two arid ecosystems: patterns and control mechanisms. Oecologia, 163,855-865.
DOI URL PMID |
[33] |
Richards JH, Caldwell MM (1987). Hydraulic lifts: substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots . Oecologia, 73,486-489.
DOI URL PMID |
[34] |
Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM, Yoder CK, Or D, Leffler AJ (2002). Hydraulic redistribution in a stand of Artemisia tridentata: evaluation of benefits to transpiration assessed with a simulation model . Oecologia, 130,173-184.
DOI URL PMID |
[35] | Sa RL (萨如拉), Zhang QL (张秋良), Wang WF (王伟峰), Xie LX (谢立新) (2009). A study on soil-water characteristic curve of natural Populus euphratica forest stand in Ejina . Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (江西农业大学学报), 31,252-257. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] |
Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Franco AC (2002). Hydraulic redistribution of soil water by neotropical savanna trees. Tree Physiology, 22,603-612.
DOI URL PMID |
[37] |
Smith DM, Jackson NA, Roberts JM, Ong CK (1999). Reverse flow of sap in tree roots and downward siphoning of water by Grevillea robusta. Functional Ecology, 13,256-264.
DOI URL |
[38] |
van Genuchten MTh (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44,892-898.
DOI URL |
[39] | Vetterlein D, Marschner H (1993). Use of a microdensitometer technique to study hydraulic lift in a sandy soil planted with pearl millet ( Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke). Plant and Soil, 149,275-282. |
[40] | Wang K (王昆), Liu YH (刘颖慧), Gao Q (高琼), Mo XG (莫兴国) (2006). Parameter analysis and scaling of plant root hydraulic redistribution model. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 30,969-975. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[41] | Warren JM, Meinzer FC, Brooks JR, Domec JC (2005). Vertical stratification of soil water storage and release dynamics in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 130,39-58. |
[42] | Yang XD (杨晓东), Lü GH (吕光辉), Tian YH (田幼华), Yang J (杨军), Zhang XM (张雪梅) (2009). Ecological groups of plants in Ebinur Lake Wetland Nature Reserve of Xinjiang. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 28,2489-2494. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[43] | Yoder CK, Nowak RS (1999). Hydraulic lift among native plant species in the Mojave Desert. Plant and Soil, 215,93-102. |
[1] | 韩路, 冯宇, 李沅楷, 王雨晴, 王海珍. 地下水埋深对灰胡杨叶片与土壤养分生态化学计量特征及其内稳态的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 92-102. |
[2] | 李豪, 马如玉, 强波, 贺聪, 韩路, 王海珍. 胡杨当年生小枝茎构型对展叶效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(11): 1251-1262. |
[3] | 王海珍, 韩路, 徐雅丽, 牛建龙. 胡杨异形叶光合作用对光强与CO2浓度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(10): 1099-1109. |
[4] | 马建新, 陈亚宁, 李卫红, 黄湘, 朱成刚, 马晓东. 胡杨液流对地下水埋深变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(8): 915-923. |
[5] | 季方, 马英杰, 樊自立. 塔里木河冲积平原胡杨林的土壤水分状况研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(1): 17-21. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19