植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 563-570.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.010 cstr: 32100.14.j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.010
姜超强1, 郑青松1, 刘兆普1, 徐文君2, 李洪燕1, 李青1
收稿日期:2009-07-01
接受日期:2009-10-30
出版日期:2010-07-01
发布日期:2010-05-01
JIANG Chao-Qiang1, ZHENG Qing-Song1, LIU Zhao-Pu1, XU Wen-Jun2, LI Hong-Yan1, LI Qing1
Received:2009-07-01
Accepted:2009-10-30
Online:2010-07-01
Published:2010-05-01
摘要:
以不同盐分强度处理欧美107杨(Populus × euramericana ‘Neva’) (Wt)和转拟南芥液泡膜Na+/H+逆向转运蛋白基因AtNHX1欧美107杨新品系(Tr)幼苗, 揭示Tr和Wt两品系幼苗耐盐性的差异, 探索拟南芥液泡膜Na+/H+逆向转运蛋白基因AtNHX1对提高杨树耐盐能力的效应。结果表明: 低盐处理下, Wt植株生长明显受到抑制, 其干重显著低于对照, 盐分强度加大后, 抑制作用更大, 其干重只有对照的50%; 而Tr植株在低盐处理下干重与对照差异不显著, 高盐处理时其干重为对照的74%。同时, 不同盐度处理下, Tr的干重均显著高于Wt, 且随着盐度升高, 两品系间植株干重差异增大。盐处理后, Tr植株叶片叶绿素和类胡萝卜素的含量均显著高于Wt, 并能维持较高的净光合速率(Pn)和PSII最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm); 在盐处理下虽然Tr叶片和根系均较Wt积累了更多的Na+, 但同时也维持了更高的K+和K+/Na+比率, 而且叶片对K+选择性的运输明显高于Wt; 同时, Tr叶片MDA含量和电解质渗漏率显著低于Wt。可见, 在盐处理下转AtNHX1植株较未转基因植株维持了更高的生长量、光合色素、光合能力和叶片质膜稳定性, 说明AtNHX1的转入能够显著提高欧美107杨的耐盐性。
姜超强, 郑青松, 刘兆普, 徐文君, 李洪燕, 李青. 转AtNHX1基因杨树Tr品系的耐盐性研究. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(5): 563-570. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.010
JIANG Chao-Qiang, ZHENG Qing-Song, LIU Zhao-Pu, XU Wen-Jun, LI Hong-Yan, LI Qing. Salt tolerance of transgenic poplar by the introduction of AtNHX1 gene. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(5): 563-570. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.010
| 品系 Strain | 对照 Control | 低盐处理 Low salt treatment | 高盐处理 High salt treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tr | 0.019 ± 0.004 | 0.395 ± 0.036 | 0.715 ± 0.035 |
| Wt | 0.019 ± 0.004 | 0.412 ± 0.023 | 0.745 ± 0.015 |
表1 盐处理结束后栽培杨树土壤的可溶性盐含量(NaCl, %) (平均值±标准偏差)
Table 1 Soil soluble salt content of poplar’s pot after salt treatment (NaCl, %) (mean ± SD)
| 品系 Strain | 对照 Control | 低盐处理 Low salt treatment | 高盐处理 High salt treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tr | 0.019 ± 0.004 | 0.395 ± 0.036 | 0.715 ± 0.035 |
| Wt | 0.019 ± 0.004 | 0.412 ± 0.023 | 0.745 ± 0.015 |
| 处理 Treatment | 基因型 Gene type | 干重 Dry weight (g DW·plant-1) | p < 0.05 | p < 0.01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照 Control | Tr | 71.57 ± 2.74a | a | A |
| Wt | 70.08 ± 4.36a | a | A | |
| 低盐 Low salt | Tr | 65.44 ± 4.82a | a | A |
| Wt | 51.58 ± 2.82b | b | B | |
| 高盐 High salt | Tr | 53.16 ± 2.38b | b | B |
| Wt | 35.15 ± 1.99c | c | C |
表2 盐处理30天转基因和未转基因植株干重的新复极差分析(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 2 Duncan test of dry weight of transgenic and wild-type poplar under different NaCl treatments for 30 days (mean ± SD)
| 处理 Treatment | 基因型 Gene type | 干重 Dry weight (g DW·plant-1) | p < 0.05 | p < 0.01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照 Control | Tr | 71.57 ± 2.74a | a | A |
| Wt | 70.08 ± 4.36a | a | A | |
| 低盐 Low salt | Tr | 65.44 ± 4.82a | a | A |
| Wt | 51.58 ± 2.82b | b | B | |
| 高盐 High salt | Tr | 53.16 ± 2.38b | b | B |
| Wt | 35.15 ± 1.99c | c | C |
图1 盐处理对杨树叶片叶绿素(Chl)和类胡萝卜素(Car)含量的影响。 Wt、Tr, 同表1。柱状图中不同字母表示差异达5%显著水平。
Fig. 1 Effects of different salt treatments on chlorophyll (Chl) content and carotenoid (Car) content in leaves of poplar. Wt, Tr, see Table 1. Different letters in the histogram indicate significant difference at 5% level.
图2 盐处理对杨树叶片净光合速率(Pn)和最大光能效率(Fv/Fm)的影响。 图注同图1。
Fig. 2 Effects of different salt treatments on net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of poplar. Notes see Fig. 1.
| 处理 Treatment | 基因型 Gene type | K+含量 K+ content (mmol·g-1 DW) | Na+含量 Na+ content (mmol·g-1 DW) | K/Na比率 K/Na ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 根 Root | 叶 Leaf | 根 Root | 叶 Leaf | 根 Root | 叶 Leaf | ||||
| 对照 Control | Tr | 0.59 ± 0.05a | 0.81 ± 0.06a | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 15.79 ± 2.06a | 21.11 ± 2.11a | ||
| Wt | 0.54 ± 0.06ab | 0.73 ± 0.07ab | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 14.15 ± 1.57b | 19.88 ± 1.57a | |||
| 低盐 Low salt | Tr | 0.55 ± 0.03ab | 0.77 ± 0.05ab | 0.38 ± 0.03c | 0.47 ± 0.01c | 1.44 ± 0.11c | 1.63 ± 0.08b | ||
| Wt | 0.45 ± 0.04cd | 0.53 ± 0.05c | 0.33 ± 0.02d | 0.37 ± 0.01d | 1.35 ± 0.08c | 1.42 ± 0.15b | |||
| 高盐 High salt | Tr | 0.51 ± 0.06bc | 0.70 ± 0.05b | 0.56 ± 0.03a | 0.79 ± 0.02a | 0.90 ± 0.09c | 0.88 ± 0.05b | ||
| Wt | 0.39 ± 0.04d | 0.40 ± 0.06d | 0.48 ± 0.03b | 0.57 ± 0.02b | 0.80 ± 0.12c | 0.71 ± 0.11b | |||
表3 盐处理下欧美杨体内离子分布状况(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 3 Ion distribution in poplar under different salt treatments (mean ± SD)
| 处理 Treatment | 基因型 Gene type | K+含量 K+ content (mmol·g-1 DW) | Na+含量 Na+ content (mmol·g-1 DW) | K/Na比率 K/Na ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 根 Root | 叶 Leaf | 根 Root | 叶 Leaf | 根 Root | 叶 Leaf | ||||
| 对照 Control | Tr | 0.59 ± 0.05a | 0.81 ± 0.06a | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 15.79 ± 2.06a | 21.11 ± 2.11a | ||
| Wt | 0.54 ± 0.06ab | 0.73 ± 0.07ab | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 14.15 ± 1.57b | 19.88 ± 1.57a | |||
| 低盐 Low salt | Tr | 0.55 ± 0.03ab | 0.77 ± 0.05ab | 0.38 ± 0.03c | 0.47 ± 0.01c | 1.44 ± 0.11c | 1.63 ± 0.08b | ||
| Wt | 0.45 ± 0.04cd | 0.53 ± 0.05c | 0.33 ± 0.02d | 0.37 ± 0.01d | 1.35 ± 0.08c | 1.42 ± 0.15b | |||
| 高盐 High salt | Tr | 0.51 ± 0.06bc | 0.70 ± 0.05b | 0.56 ± 0.03a | 0.79 ± 0.02a | 0.90 ± 0.09c | 0.88 ± 0.05b | ||
| Wt | 0.39 ± 0.04d | 0.40 ± 0.06d | 0.48 ± 0.03b | 0.57 ± 0.02b | 0.80 ± 0.12c | 0.71 ± 0.11b | |||
图4 盐处理对杨树叶片MDA含量和电解质渗漏率的影响。 图注同图1。
Fig. 4 Effects of different salt treatments on leaf MDA content and electrolytic leakage of poplar. Notes see Fig. 1.
| [1] | An BY (安宝燕), Luo Y (罗琰), Li JR (李加瑞), Qiao WH (乔卫华), Zhang XS (张宪省), Gao XQ (高新起) (2008). Expression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene of alfalfa enhances salinity tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 34, 557-564. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [2] |
Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E (1999). Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science, 285, 1256-1258.
URL PMID |
| [3] |
Arnon DI (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgris. Plant Physiology, 24, 1-15.
DOI URL PMID |
| [4] |
Barkla BJ, Pantoja O (1996). Physiology of ion transport across the tonoplast of higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 47, 159-184.
DOI URL PMID |
| [5] | Blumwald E, Aharon GS, Apse MP (2000). Sodium transport in plant cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)- Biomembranes, 1465, 140-151. |
| [6] | Chen DM (陈德明), Yu RP (俞仁培) (1998). Salt-resistance and ionic characteristics of three wheat varieties under salt stress. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 35, 88-94. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [7] |
Cramer GR, Lauchli A, Polito VS (1985). Displacement of Ca2+ by Na+ from the plasmalemma of root cells: primary response to salt stress? Plant Physiology, 79, 207-211.
DOI URL PMID |
| [8] |
Cuartero J, Bolarín MC, Asíns MJ, Moreno V (2006). Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, 1045-1058.
DOI URL PMID |
| [9] | Duan JJ (段九菊), Guo SR (郭世荣) (2005). Effects of exogenous spermidine on salt tolerance of cucumber seedlings under NaCl stress. China Vegetables (中国蔬菜), 12, 8-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [10] |
Hamada A, Shono M, Xia T, Ohta M, Hayashi Y, Tanaka A, Hayakawa T (2001). Isolation and characterization of a Na+/H+ antiporter gene from the halophyte Atriplex gmelini. Plant Molecular Biology, 46, 35-42.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
He C, Yan J, Shen G, Fu L, Holaday AS, Auld D, Blumwald E, Zhang H (2005). Expression of an Arabidopsis vacuolar sodium/proton antiporter gene in cotton improves photosynthetic performance under salt conditions and increases fiber yield in the field. Plant and Cell Physiology, 46, 1848-1854.
DOI URL PMID |
| [12] | Li HS (李合生) (2000). Principles of Plant Physiology and Technology of Biological and Chemical Experiments (植物生理生化实验原理和技术). Higher Education Press, Beijing. 134. (in Chinese) |
| [13] | Liu ZY (刘志媛), Zhu ZJ (朱祝军), Qian YR (钱亚榕), Yu JQ (喻景权) (2001). Effect of iso-osmotic Ca(NO3)2 and NaCl on growth of tomato seedlings. Acta Horticulturae Sinica (园艺学报), 28, 31-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [14] | Lü HY (吕慧颖), Li YX (李银心), Chen H (陈华), Liu J (刘晶), Li P (李平), Yang QK (杨庆凯) (2004). Molecular cloning and characterization of a Na+/H+ antiporter gene in halophyte Tetragonia tetragonioides. Chinese High Technology Letters (高技术通讯), 11, 26-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [15] |
Lü S, Zhang K, Gao Q, Lian L, Song Y, Zhang J (2008). Overexpression of an H+-PPase gene from Thellungiella halophila in cotton enhances salt tolerance and improves growth and photosynthetic performance. Plant and Cell Physiology, 49, 1150-1164.
DOI URL PMID |
| [16] |
Peever TL, Higgins VJ (1989). Electrolyte leakage, lipoxygenase, and lipid peroxidation induced in tomato leaf tissue by specific and nonspecific elicitors from Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Physiology, 90, 867-875.
URL PMID |
| [17] | Storey R (1995). Salt tolerance, ion relations and the effect of root medium on the response of Citrus to salinity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 22, 101-114. |
| [18] |
van Kooten O, Snel JFH (1990). The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynthesis Research, 25, 147-150.
URL PMID |
| [19] | Wang SP (王素平), Guo SR (郭世荣), Hu XH (胡晓辉), LI J (李璟), Jiao YS (焦彦生) (2006). Effect s of NaCl stress on the content of photosynthetic pigments in the leaves of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedling. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (江西农业大学学报), 28, 32-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [20] | Xu WJ (徐文君), Liu ZP (刘兆普), Long XH (隆小华), Zhou W (周玮) (2007). Transformation of Populus × euram- ericana with AtNHX1 gene mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiology Communications (植物生理学通讯), 43, 413-416. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [21] |
Xue ZY, Zhi DY, Xue GP, Zhang H, Zhao YX, Xia GM (2004). Enhanced salt tolerance of transgenic wheat (Tritivum aestivum L.) expressing a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene with improved grain yields in saline soils in the field and a reduced level of leaf Na+ Plant Science, 167, 849-859.
DOI URL |
| [22] | Yuan L (袁琳), Karim A (克热木·伊力), Zhang LQ (张利权) (2005). Effects of NaCl stress on active oxygen metabolism and membrane stability in Pistacia vera seedlings. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29, 985-991. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [23] |
Zhang HX, Blumwald E (2001). Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nature Biotechnology, 19, 765-768.
URL PMID |
| [24] |
Zhang HX, Hodson JN, Williams JP, Blumwald E (2001). Engineering salt-tolerant Brassica plants: characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 12832-12836.
DOI URL PMID |
| [25] | Zheng QS (郑青松), Liu ZP (刘兆普), Liu YL (刘友良), Liu L (刘玲) (2004). Effects of salt and water stresses on growth and ionic distribution in Aloe seedlings. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28, 823-827. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 陆嘉惠, 吕新, 梁永超, 林海荣. 新疆胀果甘草幼苗耐盐性及对NaCl胁迫的离子响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(9): 839-850. |
| [2] | 吕晋慧,任磊,李艳锋,王玄,赵夏陆,张春来. 不同基因型茶菊对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7): 656-664. |
| [3] | 陈惠哲, Natalia Ladatko, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 张玉屏, 孙宗修. 盐胁迫下水稻苗期Na+和K+吸收与分配规律的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(5): 937-945. |
| [4] | 钱迎倩, 田彦, 魏伟. 转基因植物的生态风险评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 1998, 22(4): 289-299. |
| [5] | 闫顺国, 沈禹颖. 生态因子对碱茅种子萌发期耐盐性影响的数量分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(5): 414-422. |
| [6] | 武之新, 纪剑勇. 碱地肤耐盐性研究初报[J]. 植物生态学报, 1989, 13(1): 79-83. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19