植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 555-562.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009
刘恩科1,2, 梅旭荣1,2,*(), 龚道枝1,2, 严昌荣1,2, 庄严1,2
收稿日期:
2009-06-05
接受日期:
2010-01-13
出版日期:
2010-06-05
发布日期:
2010-05-01
通讯作者:
梅旭荣
作者简介:
* E-mail: meixr@ieda.org.cn
LIU En-Ke1,2, MEI Xu-Rong1,2,*(), GONG Dao-Zhi1,2, YAN Chang-Rong1,2, ZHUANG Yan1,2
Received:
2009-06-05
Accepted:
2010-01-13
Online:
2010-06-05
Published:
2010-05-01
Contact:
MEI Xu-Rong
摘要:
以抗旱性强的‘石家庄8号’和抗旱性弱的‘偃麦20’冬小麦(Triticum aestivum)为材料, 在田间遮雨棚条件下, 研究返青-拔节期、拔节-开花期和灌浆后期3个生育期不同干旱程度对冬小麦产量、氮素吸收、分配和利用的影响。结果表明, 在干旱条件下, 抗旱性强的‘石家庄8号’产量高于抗旱性弱的‘偃麦20’, 并且其3个生育时期轻度干旱均可提高产量。拔节-开花期干旱对两个冬小麦品种氮素的吸收和运转影响均最大, 其次为返青-拔节期, 而灌浆后期影响较小。不同生育期中度和重度干旱均降低了花前贮藏氮素向籽粒中的转移, 并且氮肥利用效率和生产率也较低, 而在返青-拔节和灌浆后期轻度干旱有利于营养器官的氮素向籽粒中转移, 提高了氮肥利用效率和生产率。在干旱条件下, 抗旱性强的‘石家庄8号’籽粒氮素积累对花前贮藏氮素再运转的依赖程度高, 而‘偃麦20’对花后氮素的积累和转移依赖较高。综合产量和氮素的转移特点, 在生产实践中, 返青-拔节期和灌浆后期要注意对小麦进行适度的干旱处理, 在拔节-开花期要保证冬小麦的充分灌溉, 从而有利于氮素的积累和分配。
刘恩科, 梅旭荣, 龚道枝, 严昌荣, 庄严. 不同生育时期干旱对冬小麦氮素吸收与利用的影响. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(5): 555-562. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009
LIU En-Ke, MEI Xu-Rong, GONG Dao-Zhi, YAN Chang-Rong, ZHUANG Yan. Effects of drought on N absorption and utilization in winter wheat at different developmental stages. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(5): 555-562. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009
处理 Treatment | 生育阶段 Growth duration | ||
---|---|---|---|
返青-拔节期 Recovering-jointing | 拔节-开花期 Jointing-flowering | 灌浆后期 Late filling | |
T1 | 40%-45% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
T2 | 55%-60% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
T3 | 65%-70% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
T4 | 75%-80% | 40%-45% | 75%-80% |
T5 | 75%-80% | 55%-60% | 75%-80% |
T6 | 75%-80% | 65%-70% | 75%-80% |
T7 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 40%-45% |
T8 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 55%-60% |
T9 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 65%-70% |
T10 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
表1 不同干旱水平的冬小麦处理
Table 1 Different drought levels of winter wheat treatments
处理 Treatment | 生育阶段 Growth duration | ||
---|---|---|---|
返青-拔节期 Recovering-jointing | 拔节-开花期 Jointing-flowering | 灌浆后期 Late filling | |
T1 | 40%-45% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
T2 | 55%-60% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
T3 | 65%-70% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
T4 | 75%-80% | 40%-45% | 75%-80% |
T5 | 75%-80% | 55%-60% | 75%-80% |
T6 | 75%-80% | 65%-70% | 75%-80% |
T7 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 40%-45% |
T8 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 55%-60% |
T9 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 65%-70% |
T10 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
处理 Treatment | ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | ‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ |
---|---|---|
T1 | 5 375d | 6 100e |
T2 | 6 725c | 7 150c |
T3 | 7 675a | 8 250b |
T4 | 6 475c | 7 275cd |
T5 | 6 725c | 7 550c |
T6 | 7 125b | 8 200b |
T7 | 6 500c | 7 100c |
T8 | 6 550c | 7 575c |
T9 | 7 425a | 8 450a |
T10 | 7 450a | 8 150b |
表2 不同生育期不同水分条件下对冬小麦产量的影响(kg? hm-2)
Table 2 Effects of different water treatments on yields in winter wheat during different growth durations (kg?hm-2)
处理 Treatment | ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | ‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ |
---|---|---|
T1 | 5 375d | 6 100e |
T2 | 6 725c | 7 150c |
T3 | 7 675a | 8 250b |
T4 | 6 475c | 7 275cd |
T5 | 6 725c | 7 550c |
T6 | 7 125b | 8 200b |
T7 | 6 500c | 7 100c |
T8 | 6 550c | 7 575c |
T9 | 7 425a | 8 450a |
T10 | 7 450a | 8 150b |
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒 Grain | 叶 Leaf | 茎鞘+颖壳+穗轴 Stem, spike and glume |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 23.7c | 10.7a | 4.8b |
T2 | 23.8c | 9.9ab | 4.6bc | |
T3 | 23.6c | 10.7a | 4.3c | |
T4 | 19.2d | 9.4b | 4.7b | |
T5 | 22.6c | 9.2b | 4.9b | |
T6 | 23.1c | 8.4c | 4.1c | |
T7 | 27.7b | 6.8c | 4.8b | |
T8 | 29.6a | 7.9c | 5.6a | |
T9 | 28.1b | 7.6cd | 5.1b | |
T10 | 28.2b | 8.0c | 4.0c | |
‘石家庄 8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 21.6c | 10.3a | 5.8a |
T2 | 20.0d | 9.9a | 3.9c | |
T3 | 20.4cd | 10.1a | 4.9b | |
T4 | 18.3e | 7.8b | 5.2ab | |
T5 | 18.8e | 8.2b | 4.4b | |
T6 | 19.8d | 8.5b | 4.6b | |
T7 | 22.6b | 8.5b | 4.3b | |
T8 | 23.6b | 8.7b | 4.8b | |
T9 | 24.7a | 8.3b | 4.5b | |
T10 | 24.1ab | 8.2b | 4.4b |
表3 不同生育期不同水分条件下对冬小麦各器官氮含量的影响(g·kg-1)
Table 3 Effects of different water treatments on nitrogen content in different organs at maturity in winter wheat during different growth durations (g·kg-1)
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒 Grain | 叶 Leaf | 茎鞘+颖壳+穗轴 Stem, spike and glume |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 23.7c | 10.7a | 4.8b |
T2 | 23.8c | 9.9ab | 4.6bc | |
T3 | 23.6c | 10.7a | 4.3c | |
T4 | 19.2d | 9.4b | 4.7b | |
T5 | 22.6c | 9.2b | 4.9b | |
T6 | 23.1c | 8.4c | 4.1c | |
T7 | 27.7b | 6.8c | 4.8b | |
T8 | 29.6a | 7.9c | 5.6a | |
T9 | 28.1b | 7.6cd | 5.1b | |
T10 | 28.2b | 8.0c | 4.0c | |
‘石家庄 8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 21.6c | 10.3a | 5.8a |
T2 | 20.0d | 9.9a | 3.9c | |
T3 | 20.4cd | 10.1a | 4.9b | |
T4 | 18.3e | 7.8b | 5.2ab | |
T5 | 18.8e | 8.2b | 4.4b | |
T6 | 19.8d | 8.5b | 4.6b | |
T7 | 22.6b | 8.5b | 4.3b | |
T8 | 23.6b | 8.7b | 4.8b | |
T9 | 24.7a | 8.3b | 4.5b | |
T10 | 24.1ab | 8.2b | 4.4b |
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒 Grain | 叶片 Leaf | 茎鞘+颖壳+穗轴 Stem, spike and glume | 总积累量 Total accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | ||||||
‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 127.2e | 81.1 | 10.2d | 6.5 | 19.4e | 12.4 | 156.8 | |||
T2 | 160.4c | 81.8 | 11.2d | 5.7 | 24.4d | 12.5 | 196.0 | ||||
T3 | 181.0c | 82.7 | 16.1b | 7.3 | 21.8e | 9.9 | 218.9 | ||||
T4 | 124.4e | 76.8 | 10.8d | 6.7 | 26.8d | 16.5 | 161.9 | ||||
T5 | 151.8d | 79.5 | 11.0d | 5.8 | 28.2d | 14.8 | 191.0 | ||||
T6 | 164.3d | 83.6 | 10.1d | 5.2 | 22.1 | 11.2 | 196.4 | ||||
T7 | 179.8c | 78.2 | 13.2d | 5.7 | 37.0b | 16.1 | 230.0 | ||||
T8 | 194.0b | 76.6 | 14.6cd | 5.8 | 44.6a | 17.6 | 253.2 | ||||
T9 | 208.6a | 78.2 | 20.1a | 7.5 | 38.2b | 14.3 | 266.8 | ||||
T10 | 210.2a | 82.1 | 15.8b | 6.2 | 30.0c | 11.7 | 256.0 | ||||
‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijianzhuang 8’ | T1 | 131.6e | 76.6 | 8.9d | 5.2 | 31.3c | 18.2 | 171.8 | |||
T2 | 143.0e | 79.4 | 11.7c | 6.5 | 25.4d | 14.1 | 180.1 | ||||
T3 | 168.1d | 78.6 | 12.0c | 5.6 | 33.8b | 15.8 | 213.8 | ||||
T4 | 133.0e | 80.0 | 6.9e | 4.1 | 26.3d | 15.8 | 166.2 | ||||
T5 | 141.9e | 81.5 | 8.1d | 4.7 | 24.0d | 13.8 | 174.0 | ||||
T6 | 162.0d | 81.8 | 9.5d | 4.8 | 26.5d | 13.4 | 198.1 | ||||
T7 | 160.4d | 76.1 | 15.5a | 7.3 | 34.8a | 16.5 | 210.7 | ||||
T8 | 178.7c | 77.7 | 15.5a | 6.7 | 35.7a | 15.5 | 229.9 | ||||
T9 | 208.5a | 80.7 | 14.6a | 5.6 | 35.4a | 13.7 | 258.5 | ||||
T10 | 196.1b | 81.7 | 13.8b | 5.7 | 30.2c | 12.6 | 240.0 |
表4 不同生育期不同水分条件下对成熟期氮素在冬小麦不同器官中的分配的影响
Table 4 Effects of different water treatments on nitrogen distribution in different organs at maturity in winter wheat during different growth durations
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒 Grain | 叶片 Leaf | 茎鞘+颖壳+穗轴 Stem, spike and glume | 总积累量 Total accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | ||||||
‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 127.2e | 81.1 | 10.2d | 6.5 | 19.4e | 12.4 | 156.8 | |||
T2 | 160.4c | 81.8 | 11.2d | 5.7 | 24.4d | 12.5 | 196.0 | ||||
T3 | 181.0c | 82.7 | 16.1b | 7.3 | 21.8e | 9.9 | 218.9 | ||||
T4 | 124.4e | 76.8 | 10.8d | 6.7 | 26.8d | 16.5 | 161.9 | ||||
T5 | 151.8d | 79.5 | 11.0d | 5.8 | 28.2d | 14.8 | 191.0 | ||||
T6 | 164.3d | 83.6 | 10.1d | 5.2 | 22.1 | 11.2 | 196.4 | ||||
T7 | 179.8c | 78.2 | 13.2d | 5.7 | 37.0b | 16.1 | 230.0 | ||||
T8 | 194.0b | 76.6 | 14.6cd | 5.8 | 44.6a | 17.6 | 253.2 | ||||
T9 | 208.6a | 78.2 | 20.1a | 7.5 | 38.2b | 14.3 | 266.8 | ||||
T10 | 210.2a | 82.1 | 15.8b | 6.2 | 30.0c | 11.7 | 256.0 | ||||
‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijianzhuang 8’ | T1 | 131.6e | 76.6 | 8.9d | 5.2 | 31.3c | 18.2 | 171.8 | |||
T2 | 143.0e | 79.4 | 11.7c | 6.5 | 25.4d | 14.1 | 180.1 | ||||
T3 | 168.1d | 78.6 | 12.0c | 5.6 | 33.8b | 15.8 | 213.8 | ||||
T4 | 133.0e | 80.0 | 6.9e | 4.1 | 26.3d | 15.8 | 166.2 | ||||
T5 | 141.9e | 81.5 | 8.1d | 4.7 | 24.0d | 13.8 | 174.0 | ||||
T6 | 162.0d | 81.8 | 9.5d | 4.8 | 26.5d | 13.4 | 198.1 | ||||
T7 | 160.4d | 76.1 | 15.5a | 7.3 | 34.8a | 16.5 | 210.7 | ||||
T8 | 178.7c | 77.7 | 15.5a | 6.7 | 35.7a | 15.5 | 229.9 | ||||
T9 | 208.5a | 80.7 | 14.6a | 5.6 | 35.4a | 13.7 | 258.5 | ||||
T10 | 196.1b | 81.7 | 13.8b | 5.7 | 30.2c | 12.6 | 240.0 |
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 转移量 Translocation (kg?hm-2) | 转移率 Translocation efficiency (%) | 贡献率 Contribution proportion (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 88.0e | 60.7d | 69.2c |
T2 | 116.8d | 66.5b | 72.8c | |
T3 | 141.4bc | 69.0ab | 78.1b | |
T4 | 71.3f | 52.3f | 57.3e | |
T5 | 96.4e | 54.2f | 63.5d | |
T6 | 115.2d | 57.5e | 70.1c | |
T7 | 136.3c | 62.5cd | 75.8b | |
T8 | 150.4b | 66.4b | 77.6b | |
T9 | 169.1a | 71.9a | 81.1a | |
T10 | 162.0a | 67.4b | 77.1b | |
‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 96.4f | 62.3d | 73.2d |
T2 | 108.5e | 68.5cd | 75.9cd | |
T3 | 140.9c | 72.0b | 83.8ab | |
T4 | 90.8f | 59.3e | 68.3e | |
T5 | 100.4e | 65.2d | 70.8d | |
T6 | 122.9d | 66.5d | 75.9cd | |
T7 | 125.5d | 64.7d | 78.3c | |
T8 | 146.0c | 70.2b | 81.7b | |
T9 | 180.0a | 74.8a | 86.3a | |
T10 | 161.2b | 70.0b | 82.2b |
表5 不同生育期不同水分条件下对冬小麦花前植株贮藏氮素向籽粒转移的影响
Table 5 Effects of different water treatments on translocation of stored nitrogen before anthesis in winter wheat during different growth durations
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 转移量 Translocation (kg?hm-2) | 转移率 Translocation efficiency (%) | 贡献率 Contribution proportion (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 88.0e | 60.7d | 69.2c |
T2 | 116.8d | 66.5b | 72.8c | |
T3 | 141.4bc | 69.0ab | 78.1b | |
T4 | 71.3f | 52.3f | 57.3e | |
T5 | 96.4e | 54.2f | 63.5d | |
T6 | 115.2d | 57.5e | 70.1c | |
T7 | 136.3c | 62.5cd | 75.8b | |
T8 | 150.4b | 66.4b | 77.6b | |
T9 | 169.1a | 71.9a | 81.1a | |
T10 | 162.0a | 67.4b | 77.1b | |
‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 96.4f | 62.3d | 73.2d |
T2 | 108.5e | 68.5cd | 75.9cd | |
T3 | 140.9c | 72.0b | 83.8ab | |
T4 | 90.8f | 59.3e | 68.3e | |
T5 | 100.4e | 65.2d | 70.8d | |
T6 | 122.9d | 66.5d | 75.9cd | |
T7 | 125.5d | 64.7d | 78.3c | |
T8 | 146.0c | 70.2b | 81.7b | |
T9 | 180.0a | 74.8a | 86.3a | |
T10 | 161.2b | 70.0b | 82.2b |
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥利用效率 N fertilizer utilization rate (%) | 氮肥生产效率 N fertilizer productive efficiency (kg?kg-1) | 土壤氮贡献率 Soil N contribution rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 24.7f | 23.9c | 64.6a |
T2 | 42.1d | 29.9b | 51.7b | |
T3 | 52.3c | 34.1a | 46.3c | |
T4 | 26.9f | 28.8b | 62.6a | |
T5 | 39.9e | 29.9b | 53.0b | |
T6 | 42.3d | 31.7b | 51.6b | |
T7 | 57.2c | 28.9b | 44.0c | |
T8 | 67.5b | 29.1b | 40.0c | |
T9 | 73.6a | 33.0a | 38.0c | |
T10 | 68.7b | 33.1a | 39.6c | |
‘石家庄 8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 36.3f | 27.1c | 52.4ab |
T2 | 40.1d | 31.8b | 50.0b | |
T3 | 55.0c | 36.7a | 42.1c | |
T4 | 33.9f | 32.3b | 54.2a | |
T5 | 37.3e | 33.6b | 51.7b | |
T6 | 48.0d | 36.4a | 45.4c | |
T7 | 53.6c | 31.6b | 42.7c | |
T8 | 62.2b | 33.7b | 39.2d | |
T9 | 74.9a | 37.6a | 34.8d | |
T10 | 66.7b | 36.2a | 37.5d |
表6 不同生育期不同水分条件下对冬小麦氮素利用效率的影响
Table 6 Effects of different water treatments on nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat during different growth durations
品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥利用效率 N fertilizer utilization rate (%) | 氮肥生产效率 N fertilizer productive efficiency (kg?kg-1) | 土壤氮贡献率 Soil N contribution rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 24.7f | 23.9c | 64.6a |
T2 | 42.1d | 29.9b | 51.7b | |
T3 | 52.3c | 34.1a | 46.3c | |
T4 | 26.9f | 28.8b | 62.6a | |
T5 | 39.9e | 29.9b | 53.0b | |
T6 | 42.3d | 31.7b | 51.6b | |
T7 | 57.2c | 28.9b | 44.0c | |
T8 | 67.5b | 29.1b | 40.0c | |
T9 | 73.6a | 33.0a | 38.0c | |
T10 | 68.7b | 33.1a | 39.6c | |
‘石家庄 8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 36.3f | 27.1c | 52.4ab |
T2 | 40.1d | 31.8b | 50.0b | |
T3 | 55.0c | 36.7a | 42.1c | |
T4 | 33.9f | 32.3b | 54.2a | |
T5 | 37.3e | 33.6b | 51.7b | |
T6 | 48.0d | 36.4a | 45.4c | |
T7 | 53.6c | 31.6b | 42.7c | |
T8 | 62.2b | 33.7b | 39.2d | |
T9 | 74.9a | 37.6a | 34.8d | |
T10 | 66.7b | 36.2a | 37.5d |
[1] | Bao SD (鲍士旦) (2000). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (土壤农化分析). China Agricultural Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[2] | Barber JS, Jessop RS (1987). Factors affecting yield and quality in irrigated wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, 109, 19-26. |
[3] | Fan XM (范雪梅), Jiang D (姜东), Dai TB (戴廷波), Jing Q (荆奇), Cao WX (曹卫星) (2006). Effects of nitrogen on grain yield and quality in wheat grown under drought or water logging stress from anthesis to maturity. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 30, 71-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Fischer RA (1993). Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertilizer. II. Physiology of grain yield response. Field Crops Research, 33, 57-80. |
[5] | Guitman MR, Arnozis PA, Barneix AJ (1991). Effect of souce-sink relations and nitrogen nutrition on senescence and N remobilization in the flag leaf of wheat. Physiologia Plantarum, 82, 278-284. |
[6] | Hirel B, Andrieu B, Valadier MH, Renard S, Quillere I, Chelle M, Pommel B, Fournier C, Drouet JL (2005). Physiology of maize II. identification of physiological marker representative of the nitrogen status of maize ( Zea mays) leaves during grain filling. Physiologia Plantarum, 124, 178-188. |
[7] | Huo ZY (霍中洋), Ge X (葛鑫), Zhang HC (张洪程), Xu K (许轲), Gong ZK (龚振恺) (2004). Effect of different nitrogen application types on N-absorption and N-utilization rate of specific use cultivars of wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 30, 449-454. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Kang SZ, Zhang L, Liang YL, Hu XT, Cai HJ, Gu BJ (2002). Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management, 55, 203-216. |
[9] | Li SJ (李世娟), Zhou DX (周殿玺), Zhu YP (诸叶平), Li JM (李建民), Lan LW (兰林旺) (2002). Effects of water and nitrogen application on nitrogen uptake and distribution in wheat. Acta Agriculturae Boreall-Sinica (华北农学报), 17(1), 69-75. |
[10] |
Palta JA, Kobata T, Turner NC, Fillery IR (1994). Remobilization of carbon and nitrogen in wheat as influenced by postanthesis water deficits. Crop Science, 34, 118-124.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Schahram B, Sharyar B, Peter W, Konrad M (2008). Improvement of water use and N fertilizer efficiency by subsoil irrigation of winter wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 1-7.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Seligman NG, Sinclair TR (1995). Global environment change and simulated forage quality of wheat II. Water and nitrogen stress. Field Crops Research, 40, 29-37.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Smith CJ, Whitfield DM (1990). Nitrogen accumulation and redistribution of late applications of 15N-labelled fertilizer by wheat. Field Crops Research, 24, 211-228.
DOI URL |
[14] | Sun ZY (孙振元), Han BW (韩碧文), Liu SL (刘淑兰), Wang HF (王华芳), Gao RF (高荣孚) (1996). Absorption and redistribution of nitrogen during grainfilling period of wheat and their regulation by 6-benzylaminopurine. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica (植物生理学报), 22, 258-264. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Wang CH (王朝辉), Wang B (王兵), Li SX (李生秀) (2004). Influence of water deficit and supplemental irrigation on nitrogen uptake by winter wheat and nitrogen residual in soil. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15, 1339-1343. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Xu ZZ (许振柱), Wang CA (王崇爱), Li H (李晖) (2004). Effects of soil drought on photosynthesis, nitrogen and nitrogen translocation efficiency in wheat leaves. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 22(4), 75-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Xu ZZ (许振柱), Yu ZW (于振文), Qi XH (亓新华), Yu SL (余松烈) (1995). Effect of soil drought on ethylene evolution, polyamine accumulation and cell membrane in flag leaf of winter wheat. Acta Phytophisiologica Sinica (植物生理学报), 21, 295-301. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] |
Yang JC, Zhang JH, Huang ZL, Zhu QS, Wang L (2000). Remobilization of carbon reserves is improved by controlled soil-drying during grain filling of wheat. Crop Science, 40, 1645-1655.
DOI URL |
[19] | Yang XY (杨晓亚), Yu ZW (于振文), Xu ZZ (许振柱) (2009). Effects of irrigation regimes on water consumption characteristics and nitrogen accumulation and allocation in wheat. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 846-853. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Zhang YL (张永丽), Yu ZW (于振文) (2008). Effects of irrigation amount on nitrogen uptake, distribution, use, and grain yield and quality in wheat. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 34, 870-878. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Zhao H (赵辉), Dai TB (戴廷波), Jiang D (姜东), Jing Q (荆奇), Cao WX (曹卫星) (2007). Effects of drought and waterlogging on flag leaf post-anthesis photosynthetic characteristics and assimilates translocation in winter wheat under high temperature. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 18, 333-338. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Zheng CY (郑成岩), Yu ZW (于振文), Ma XH (马兴华), Wang XZ (王西芝), Bai HL (白洪立) (2008). Water consumption characteristic and dry matter accumulation and distribution in high-yielding wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 34, 1450-1458. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 张智洋 赵颖慧 甄贞. 1986-2022年松花江流域陆地生态系统碳储量动态监测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 耿雪琪, 唐亚坤, 王丽娜, 邓旭, 张泽凌, 周莹. 氮添加增加中国陆生植物生物量并降低其氮利用效率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 147-157. |
[3] | 李伯新, 姜超, 孙建新. CMIP6模式对中国西南部地区植被碳利用率模拟能力综合评估[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1211-1224. |
[4] | 李伟斌, 张红霞, 张玉书, 陈妮娜. 昼夜不对称增温对长白山阔叶红松林碳汇能力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1225-1233. |
[5] | 张慧玲, 张耀艺, 彭清清, 杨静, 倪祥银, 吴福忠. 中亚热带同质园不同生活型树种微量元素重吸收效率的差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 978-987. |
[6] | 赵小宁, 田晓楠, 李新, 李广德, 郭有正, 贾黎明, 段劼, 席本野. Granier原始公式计算树干液流速率的适用性分析——以毛白杨为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 404-417. |
[7] | 张尧, 陈岚, 王洁莹, 李益, 王俊, 郭垚鑫, 任成杰, 白红英, 孙昊田, 赵发珠. 太白山不同海拔森林根际土壤微生物碳利用效率差异性及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 275-288. |
[8] | 冯旭飞, 雷长英, 张玉洁, 向导, 杨明凤, 张旺锋, 张亚黎. 棉花花铃期叶片氮分配对光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1600-1610. |
[9] | 李万年, 罗益敏, 黄则月, 杨梅. 望天树人工幼林混交对土壤微生物功能多样性与碳源利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1109-1124. |
[10] | 熊淑萍, 曹文博, 曹锐, 张志勇, 付新露, 徐赛俊, 潘虎强, 王小纯, 马新明. 水平结构配置对冬小麦冠层垂直结构、微环境及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 188-196. |
[11] | 郑周涛, 张扬建. 1982-2018年青藏高原水分利用效率变化及归因分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1486-1496. |
[12] | 崔光帅, 罗天祥, 梁尔源, 张林. 干旱半干旱区灌丛对草本植物的促进作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1321-1333. |
[13] | 张景慧, 王铮, 黄永梅, 陈慧颖, 李智勇, 梁存柱. 草地利用方式对温性典型草原优势种植物功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 818-833. |
[14] | 桂子洋, 秦树高, 胡朝, 白凤, 石慧书, 张宇清. 毛乌素沙地两种典型灌木叶片凝结水吸收能力及吸水途径[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(6): 583-593. |
[15] | 韩璐, 杨菲, 吴应明, 牛云明, 曾祎明, 陈立欣. 晋西黄土区典型乔灌木短期水分利用效率对环境因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1350-1364. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19