植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 555-562.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009 cstr: 32100.14.j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009
刘恩科1,2, 梅旭荣1,2,*(
), 龚道枝1,2, 严昌荣1,2, 庄严1,2
收稿日期:2009-06-05
接受日期:2010-01-13
出版日期:2010-06-05
发布日期:2010-05-01
作者简介:* E-mail: meixr@ieda.org.cn
LIU En-Ke1,2, MEI Xu-Rong1,2,*(
), GONG Dao-Zhi1,2, YAN Chang-Rong1,2, ZHUANG Yan1,2
Received:2009-06-05
Accepted:2010-01-13
Online:2010-06-05
Published:2010-05-01
摘要:
以抗旱性强的‘石家庄8号’和抗旱性弱的‘偃麦20’冬小麦(Triticum aestivum)为材料, 在田间遮雨棚条件下, 研究返青-拔节期、拔节-开花期和灌浆后期3个生育期不同干旱程度对冬小麦产量、氮素吸收、分配和利用的影响。结果表明, 在干旱条件下, 抗旱性强的‘石家庄8号’产量高于抗旱性弱的‘偃麦20’, 并且其3个生育时期轻度干旱均可提高产量。拔节-开花期干旱对两个冬小麦品种氮素的吸收和运转影响均最大, 其次为返青-拔节期, 而灌浆后期影响较小。不同生育期中度和重度干旱均降低了花前贮藏氮素向籽粒中的转移, 并且氮肥利用效率和生产率也较低, 而在返青-拔节和灌浆后期轻度干旱有利于营养器官的氮素向籽粒中转移, 提高了氮肥利用效率和生产率。在干旱条件下, 抗旱性强的‘石家庄8号’籽粒氮素积累对花前贮藏氮素再运转的依赖程度高, 而‘偃麦20’对花后氮素的积累和转移依赖较高。综合产量和氮素的转移特点, 在生产实践中, 返青-拔节期和灌浆后期要注意对小麦进行适度的干旱处理, 在拔节-开花期要保证冬小麦的充分灌溉, 从而有利于氮素的积累和分配。
刘恩科, 梅旭荣, 龚道枝, 严昌荣, 庄严. 不同生育时期干旱对冬小麦氮素吸收与利用的影响. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(5): 555-562. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009
LIU En-Ke, MEI Xu-Rong, GONG Dao-Zhi, YAN Chang-Rong, ZHUANG Yan. Effects of drought on N absorption and utilization in winter wheat at different developmental stages. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(5): 555-562. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.009
| 处理 Treatment | 生育阶段 Growth duration | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 返青-拔节期 Recovering-jointing | 拔节-开花期 Jointing-flowering | 灌浆后期 Late filling | |
| T1 | 40%-45% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
| T2 | 55%-60% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
| T3 | 65%-70% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
| T4 | 75%-80% | 40%-45% | 75%-80% |
| T5 | 75%-80% | 55%-60% | 75%-80% |
| T6 | 75%-80% | 65%-70% | 75%-80% |
| T7 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 40%-45% |
| T8 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 55%-60% |
| T9 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 65%-70% |
| T10 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
表1 不同干旱水平的冬小麦处理
Table 1 Different drought levels of winter wheat treatments
| 处理 Treatment | 生育阶段 Growth duration | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 返青-拔节期 Recovering-jointing | 拔节-开花期 Jointing-flowering | 灌浆后期 Late filling | |
| T1 | 40%-45% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
| T2 | 55%-60% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
| T3 | 65%-70% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
| T4 | 75%-80% | 40%-45% | 75%-80% |
| T5 | 75%-80% | 55%-60% | 75%-80% |
| T6 | 75%-80% | 65%-70% | 75%-80% |
| T7 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 40%-45% |
| T8 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 55%-60% |
| T9 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 65%-70% |
| T10 | 75%-80% | 75%-80% | 75%-80% |
| 处理 Treatment | ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | ‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | 5 375d | 6 100e |
| T2 | 6 725c | 7 150c |
| T3 | 7 675a | 8 250b |
| T4 | 6 475c | 7 275cd |
| T5 | 6 725c | 7 550c |
| T6 | 7 125b | 8 200b |
| T7 | 6 500c | 7 100c |
| T8 | 6 550c | 7 575c |
| T9 | 7 425a | 8 450a |
| T10 | 7 450a | 8 150b |
表2 不同生育期不同水分条件下对冬小麦产量的影响(kg? hm-2)
Table 2 Effects of different water treatments on yields in winter wheat during different growth durations (kg?hm-2)
| 处理 Treatment | ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | ‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | 5 375d | 6 100e |
| T2 | 6 725c | 7 150c |
| T3 | 7 675a | 8 250b |
| T4 | 6 475c | 7 275cd |
| T5 | 6 725c | 7 550c |
| T6 | 7 125b | 8 200b |
| T7 | 6 500c | 7 100c |
| T8 | 6 550c | 7 575c |
| T9 | 7 425a | 8 450a |
| T10 | 7 450a | 8 150b |
| 品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒 Grain | 叶 Leaf | 茎鞘+颖壳+穗轴 Stem, spike and glume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 23.7c | 10.7a | 4.8b |
| T2 | 23.8c | 9.9ab | 4.6bc | |
| T3 | 23.6c | 10.7a | 4.3c | |
| T4 | 19.2d | 9.4b | 4.7b | |
| T5 | 22.6c | 9.2b | 4.9b | |
| T6 | 23.1c | 8.4c | 4.1c | |
| T7 | 27.7b | 6.8c | 4.8b | |
| T8 | 29.6a | 7.9c | 5.6a | |
| T9 | 28.1b | 7.6cd | 5.1b | |
| T10 | 28.2b | 8.0c | 4.0c | |
| ‘石家庄 8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 21.6c | 10.3a | 5.8a |
| T2 | 20.0d | 9.9a | 3.9c | |
| T3 | 20.4cd | 10.1a | 4.9b | |
| T4 | 18.3e | 7.8b | 5.2ab | |
| T5 | 18.8e | 8.2b | 4.4b | |
| T6 | 19.8d | 8.5b | 4.6b | |
| T7 | 22.6b | 8.5b | 4.3b | |
| T8 | 23.6b | 8.7b | 4.8b | |
| T9 | 24.7a | 8.3b | 4.5b | |
| T10 | 24.1ab | 8.2b | 4.4b |
表3 不同生育期不同水分条件下对冬小麦各器官氮含量的影响(g·kg-1)
Table 3 Effects of different water treatments on nitrogen content in different organs at maturity in winter wheat during different growth durations (g·kg-1)
| 品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒 Grain | 叶 Leaf | 茎鞘+颖壳+穗轴 Stem, spike and glume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 23.7c | 10.7a | 4.8b |
| T2 | 23.8c | 9.9ab | 4.6bc | |
| T3 | 23.6c | 10.7a | 4.3c | |
| T4 | 19.2d | 9.4b | 4.7b | |
| T5 | 22.6c | 9.2b | 4.9b | |
| T6 | 23.1c | 8.4c | 4.1c | |
| T7 | 27.7b | 6.8c | 4.8b | |
| T8 | 29.6a | 7.9c | 5.6a | |
| T9 | 28.1b | 7.6cd | 5.1b | |
| T10 | 28.2b | 8.0c | 4.0c | |
| ‘石家庄 8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 21.6c | 10.3a | 5.8a |
| T2 | 20.0d | 9.9a | 3.9c | |
| T3 | 20.4cd | 10.1a | 4.9b | |
| T4 | 18.3e | 7.8b | 5.2ab | |
| T5 | 18.8e | 8.2b | 4.4b | |
| T6 | 19.8d | 8.5b | 4.6b | |
| T7 | 22.6b | 8.5b | 4.3b | |
| T8 | 23.6b | 8.7b | 4.8b | |
| T9 | 24.7a | 8.3b | 4.5b | |
| T10 | 24.1ab | 8.2b | 4.4b |
| 品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒 Grain | 叶片 Leaf | 茎鞘+颖壳+穗轴 Stem, spike and glume | 总积累量 Total accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | ||||||
| ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 127.2e | 81.1 | 10.2d | 6.5 | 19.4e | 12.4 | 156.8 | |||
| T2 | 160.4c | 81.8 | 11.2d | 5.7 | 24.4d | 12.5 | 196.0 | ||||
| T3 | 181.0c | 82.7 | 16.1b | 7.3 | 21.8e | 9.9 | 218.9 | ||||
| T4 | 124.4e | 76.8 | 10.8d | 6.7 | 26.8d | 16.5 | 161.9 | ||||
| T5 | 151.8d | 79.5 | 11.0d | 5.8 | 28.2d | 14.8 | 191.0 | ||||
| T6 | 164.3d | 83.6 | 10.1d | 5.2 | 22.1 | 11.2 | 196.4 | ||||
| T7 | 179.8c | 78.2 | 13.2d | 5.7 | 37.0b | 16.1 | 230.0 | ||||
| T8 | 194.0b | 76.6 | 14.6cd | 5.8 | 44.6a | 17.6 | 253.2 | ||||
| T9 | 208.6a | 78.2 | 20.1a | 7.5 | 38.2b | 14.3 | 266.8 | ||||
| T10 | 210.2a | 82.1 | 15.8b | 6.2 | 30.0c | 11.7 | 256.0 | ||||
| ‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijianzhuang 8’ | T1 | 131.6e | 76.6 | 8.9d | 5.2 | 31.3c | 18.2 | 171.8 | |||
| T2 | 143.0e | 79.4 | 11.7c | 6.5 | 25.4d | 14.1 | 180.1 | ||||
| T3 | 168.1d | 78.6 | 12.0c | 5.6 | 33.8b | 15.8 | 213.8 | ||||
| T4 | 133.0e | 80.0 | 6.9e | 4.1 | 26.3d | 15.8 | 166.2 | ||||
| T5 | 141.9e | 81.5 | 8.1d | 4.7 | 24.0d | 13.8 | 174.0 | ||||
| T6 | 162.0d | 81.8 | 9.5d | 4.8 | 26.5d | 13.4 | 198.1 | ||||
| T7 | 160.4d | 76.1 | 15.5a | 7.3 | 34.8a | 16.5 | 210.7 | ||||
| T8 | 178.7c | 77.7 | 15.5a | 6.7 | 35.7a | 15.5 | 229.9 | ||||
| T9 | 208.5a | 80.7 | 14.6a | 5.6 | 35.4a | 13.7 | 258.5 | ||||
| T10 | 196.1b | 81.7 | 13.8b | 5.7 | 30.2c | 12.6 | 240.0 | ||||
表4 不同生育期不同水分条件下对成熟期氮素在冬小麦不同器官中的分配的影响
Table 4 Effects of different water treatments on nitrogen distribution in different organs at maturity in winter wheat during different growth durations
| 品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒 Grain | 叶片 Leaf | 茎鞘+颖壳+穗轴 Stem, spike and glume | 总积累量 Total accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg?hm-2) | 比例 Proportion (%) | ||||||
| ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 127.2e | 81.1 | 10.2d | 6.5 | 19.4e | 12.4 | 156.8 | |||
| T2 | 160.4c | 81.8 | 11.2d | 5.7 | 24.4d | 12.5 | 196.0 | ||||
| T3 | 181.0c | 82.7 | 16.1b | 7.3 | 21.8e | 9.9 | 218.9 | ||||
| T4 | 124.4e | 76.8 | 10.8d | 6.7 | 26.8d | 16.5 | 161.9 | ||||
| T5 | 151.8d | 79.5 | 11.0d | 5.8 | 28.2d | 14.8 | 191.0 | ||||
| T6 | 164.3d | 83.6 | 10.1d | 5.2 | 22.1 | 11.2 | 196.4 | ||||
| T7 | 179.8c | 78.2 | 13.2d | 5.7 | 37.0b | 16.1 | 230.0 | ||||
| T8 | 194.0b | 76.6 | 14.6cd | 5.8 | 44.6a | 17.6 | 253.2 | ||||
| T9 | 208.6a | 78.2 | 20.1a | 7.5 | 38.2b | 14.3 | 266.8 | ||||
| T10 | 210.2a | 82.1 | 15.8b | 6.2 | 30.0c | 11.7 | 256.0 | ||||
| ‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijianzhuang 8’ | T1 | 131.6e | 76.6 | 8.9d | 5.2 | 31.3c | 18.2 | 171.8 | |||
| T2 | 143.0e | 79.4 | 11.7c | 6.5 | 25.4d | 14.1 | 180.1 | ||||
| T3 | 168.1d | 78.6 | 12.0c | 5.6 | 33.8b | 15.8 | 213.8 | ||||
| T4 | 133.0e | 80.0 | 6.9e | 4.1 | 26.3d | 15.8 | 166.2 | ||||
| T5 | 141.9e | 81.5 | 8.1d | 4.7 | 24.0d | 13.8 | 174.0 | ||||
| T6 | 162.0d | 81.8 | 9.5d | 4.8 | 26.5d | 13.4 | 198.1 | ||||
| T7 | 160.4d | 76.1 | 15.5a | 7.3 | 34.8a | 16.5 | 210.7 | ||||
| T8 | 178.7c | 77.7 | 15.5a | 6.7 | 35.7a | 15.5 | 229.9 | ||||
| T9 | 208.5a | 80.7 | 14.6a | 5.6 | 35.4a | 13.7 | 258.5 | ||||
| T10 | 196.1b | 81.7 | 13.8b | 5.7 | 30.2c | 12.6 | 240.0 | ||||
| 品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 转移量 Translocation (kg?hm-2) | 转移率 Translocation efficiency (%) | 贡献率 Contribution proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 88.0e | 60.7d | 69.2c |
| T2 | 116.8d | 66.5b | 72.8c | |
| T3 | 141.4bc | 69.0ab | 78.1b | |
| T4 | 71.3f | 52.3f | 57.3e | |
| T5 | 96.4e | 54.2f | 63.5d | |
| T6 | 115.2d | 57.5e | 70.1c | |
| T7 | 136.3c | 62.5cd | 75.8b | |
| T8 | 150.4b | 66.4b | 77.6b | |
| T9 | 169.1a | 71.9a | 81.1a | |
| T10 | 162.0a | 67.4b | 77.1b | |
| ‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 96.4f | 62.3d | 73.2d |
| T2 | 108.5e | 68.5cd | 75.9cd | |
| T3 | 140.9c | 72.0b | 83.8ab | |
| T4 | 90.8f | 59.3e | 68.3e | |
| T5 | 100.4e | 65.2d | 70.8d | |
| T6 | 122.9d | 66.5d | 75.9cd | |
| T7 | 125.5d | 64.7d | 78.3c | |
| T8 | 146.0c | 70.2b | 81.7b | |
| T9 | 180.0a | 74.8a | 86.3a | |
| T10 | 161.2b | 70.0b | 82.2b |
表5 不同生育期不同水分条件下对冬小麦花前植株贮藏氮素向籽粒转移的影响
Table 5 Effects of different water treatments on translocation of stored nitrogen before anthesis in winter wheat during different growth durations
| 品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 转移量 Translocation (kg?hm-2) | 转移率 Translocation efficiency (%) | 贡献率 Contribution proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 88.0e | 60.7d | 69.2c |
| T2 | 116.8d | 66.5b | 72.8c | |
| T3 | 141.4bc | 69.0ab | 78.1b | |
| T4 | 71.3f | 52.3f | 57.3e | |
| T5 | 96.4e | 54.2f | 63.5d | |
| T6 | 115.2d | 57.5e | 70.1c | |
| T7 | 136.3c | 62.5cd | 75.8b | |
| T8 | 150.4b | 66.4b | 77.6b | |
| T9 | 169.1a | 71.9a | 81.1a | |
| T10 | 162.0a | 67.4b | 77.1b | |
| ‘石家庄8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 96.4f | 62.3d | 73.2d |
| T2 | 108.5e | 68.5cd | 75.9cd | |
| T3 | 140.9c | 72.0b | 83.8ab | |
| T4 | 90.8f | 59.3e | 68.3e | |
| T5 | 100.4e | 65.2d | 70.8d | |
| T6 | 122.9d | 66.5d | 75.9cd | |
| T7 | 125.5d | 64.7d | 78.3c | |
| T8 | 146.0c | 70.2b | 81.7b | |
| T9 | 180.0a | 74.8a | 86.3a | |
| T10 | 161.2b | 70.0b | 82.2b |
| 品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥利用效率 N fertilizer utilization rate (%) | 氮肥生产效率 N fertilizer productive efficiency (kg?kg-1) | 土壤氮贡献率 Soil N contribution rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 24.7f | 23.9c | 64.6a |
| T2 | 42.1d | 29.9b | 51.7b | |
| T3 | 52.3c | 34.1a | 46.3c | |
| T4 | 26.9f | 28.8b | 62.6a | |
| T5 | 39.9e | 29.9b | 53.0b | |
| T6 | 42.3d | 31.7b | 51.6b | |
| T7 | 57.2c | 28.9b | 44.0c | |
| T8 | 67.5b | 29.1b | 40.0c | |
| T9 | 73.6a | 33.0a | 38.0c | |
| T10 | 68.7b | 33.1a | 39.6c | |
| ‘石家庄 8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 36.3f | 27.1c | 52.4ab |
| T2 | 40.1d | 31.8b | 50.0b | |
| T3 | 55.0c | 36.7a | 42.1c | |
| T4 | 33.9f | 32.3b | 54.2a | |
| T5 | 37.3e | 33.6b | 51.7b | |
| T6 | 48.0d | 36.4a | 45.4c | |
| T7 | 53.6c | 31.6b | 42.7c | |
| T8 | 62.2b | 33.7b | 39.2d | |
| T9 | 74.9a | 37.6a | 34.8d | |
| T10 | 66.7b | 36.2a | 37.5d |
表6 不同生育期不同水分条件下对冬小麦氮素利用效率的影响
Table 6 Effects of different water treatments on nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat during different growth durations
| 品种 Cultivar | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥利用效率 N fertilizer utilization rate (%) | 氮肥生产效率 N fertilizer productive efficiency (kg?kg-1) | 土壤氮贡献率 Soil N contribution rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘偃麦20’ ‘Yanmai 20’ | T1 | 24.7f | 23.9c | 64.6a |
| T2 | 42.1d | 29.9b | 51.7b | |
| T3 | 52.3c | 34.1a | 46.3c | |
| T4 | 26.9f | 28.8b | 62.6a | |
| T5 | 39.9e | 29.9b | 53.0b | |
| T6 | 42.3d | 31.7b | 51.6b | |
| T7 | 57.2c | 28.9b | 44.0c | |
| T8 | 67.5b | 29.1b | 40.0c | |
| T9 | 73.6a | 33.0a | 38.0c | |
| T10 | 68.7b | 33.1a | 39.6c | |
| ‘石家庄 8号’ ‘Shijiazhuang 8’ | T1 | 36.3f | 27.1c | 52.4ab |
| T2 | 40.1d | 31.8b | 50.0b | |
| T3 | 55.0c | 36.7a | 42.1c | |
| T4 | 33.9f | 32.3b | 54.2a | |
| T5 | 37.3e | 33.6b | 51.7b | |
| T6 | 48.0d | 36.4a | 45.4c | |
| T7 | 53.6c | 31.6b | 42.7c | |
| T8 | 62.2b | 33.7b | 39.2d | |
| T9 | 74.9a | 37.6a | 34.8d | |
| T10 | 66.7b | 36.2a | 37.5d |
| [1] | Bao SD (鲍士旦) (2000). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (土壤农化分析). China Agricultural Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
| [2] | Barber JS, Jessop RS (1987). Factors affecting yield and quality in irrigated wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, 109, 19-26. |
| [3] | Fan XM (范雪梅), Jiang D (姜东), Dai TB (戴廷波), Jing Q (荆奇), Cao WX (曹卫星) (2006). Effects of nitrogen on grain yield and quality in wheat grown under drought or water logging stress from anthesis to maturity. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 30, 71-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [4] | Fischer RA (1993). Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertilizer. II. Physiology of grain yield response. Field Crops Research, 33, 57-80. |
| [5] | Guitman MR, Arnozis PA, Barneix AJ (1991). Effect of souce-sink relations and nitrogen nutrition on senescence and N remobilization in the flag leaf of wheat. Physiologia Plantarum, 82, 278-284. |
| [6] | Hirel B, Andrieu B, Valadier MH, Renard S, Quillere I, Chelle M, Pommel B, Fournier C, Drouet JL (2005). Physiology of maize II. identification of physiological marker representative of the nitrogen status of maize ( Zea mays) leaves during grain filling. Physiologia Plantarum, 124, 178-188. |
| [7] | Huo ZY (霍中洋), Ge X (葛鑫), Zhang HC (张洪程), Xu K (许轲), Gong ZK (龚振恺) (2004). Effect of different nitrogen application types on N-absorption and N-utilization rate of specific use cultivars of wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 30, 449-454. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [8] | Kang SZ, Zhang L, Liang YL, Hu XT, Cai HJ, Gu BJ (2002). Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management, 55, 203-216. |
| [9] | Li SJ (李世娟), Zhou DX (周殿玺), Zhu YP (诸叶平), Li JM (李建民), Lan LW (兰林旺) (2002). Effects of water and nitrogen application on nitrogen uptake and distribution in wheat. Acta Agriculturae Boreall-Sinica (华北农学报), 17(1), 69-75. |
| [10] |
Palta JA, Kobata T, Turner NC, Fillery IR (1994). Remobilization of carbon and nitrogen in wheat as influenced by postanthesis water deficits. Crop Science, 34, 118-124.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
Schahram B, Sharyar B, Peter W, Konrad M (2008). Improvement of water use and N fertilizer efficiency by subsoil irrigation of winter wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 1-7.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
Seligman NG, Sinclair TR (1995). Global environment change and simulated forage quality of wheat II. Water and nitrogen stress. Field Crops Research, 40, 29-37.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Smith CJ, Whitfield DM (1990). Nitrogen accumulation and redistribution of late applications of 15N-labelled fertilizer by wheat. Field Crops Research, 24, 211-228.
DOI URL |
| [14] | Sun ZY (孙振元), Han BW (韩碧文), Liu SL (刘淑兰), Wang HF (王华芳), Gao RF (高荣孚) (1996). Absorption and redistribution of nitrogen during grainfilling period of wheat and their regulation by 6-benzylaminopurine. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica (植物生理学报), 22, 258-264. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [15] | Wang CH (王朝辉), Wang B (王兵), Li SX (李生秀) (2004). Influence of water deficit and supplemental irrigation on nitrogen uptake by winter wheat and nitrogen residual in soil. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15, 1339-1343. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [16] | Xu ZZ (许振柱), Wang CA (王崇爱), Li H (李晖) (2004). Effects of soil drought on photosynthesis, nitrogen and nitrogen translocation efficiency in wheat leaves. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 22(4), 75-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [17] | Xu ZZ (许振柱), Yu ZW (于振文), Qi XH (亓新华), Yu SL (余松烈) (1995). Effect of soil drought on ethylene evolution, polyamine accumulation and cell membrane in flag leaf of winter wheat. Acta Phytophisiologica Sinica (植物生理学报), 21, 295-301. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [18] |
Yang JC, Zhang JH, Huang ZL, Zhu QS, Wang L (2000). Remobilization of carbon reserves is improved by controlled soil-drying during grain filling of wheat. Crop Science, 40, 1645-1655.
DOI URL |
| [19] | Yang XY (杨晓亚), Yu ZW (于振文), Xu ZZ (许振柱) (2009). Effects of irrigation regimes on water consumption characteristics and nitrogen accumulation and allocation in wheat. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 846-853. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [20] | Zhang YL (张永丽), Yu ZW (于振文) (2008). Effects of irrigation amount on nitrogen uptake, distribution, use, and grain yield and quality in wheat. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 34, 870-878. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [21] | Zhao H (赵辉), Dai TB (戴廷波), Jiang D (姜东), Jing Q (荆奇), Cao WX (曹卫星) (2007). Effects of drought and waterlogging on flag leaf post-anthesis photosynthetic characteristics and assimilates translocation in winter wheat under high temperature. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 18, 333-338. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [22] | Zheng CY (郑成岩), Yu ZW (于振文), Ma XH (马兴华), Wang XZ (王西芝), Bai HL (白洪立) (2008). Water consumption characteristic and dry matter accumulation and distribution in high-yielding wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 34, 1450-1458. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 汪子轩, 邢爱军, 陈子歆, 沈海花, 方精云. 长期氮添加对北方森林林下植物功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 244-255. |
| [2] | 王蓉钧, 吴福忠, 吴秋霞, 朱晶晶, 倪祥银. 不同生活型植物叶片氮重吸收效率的差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 344-351. |
| [3] | 皮惠之, 张秋芳, 孙浩, 曾泉鑫, 彭园珍, 元晓春, 徐建国, 陈岳民. 微生物碳氮不平衡影响罗浮栲林土壤微生物氮利用效率对氮富集的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 34-44. |
| [4] | 赵洪贤, 刘鹏, 史曼英, 徐铭泽, 贾昕, 田赟, 查天山. 毛乌素沙地典型固沙植物黑沙蒿和赖草叶片氮分配对最大净光合速率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 460-474. |
| [5] | 竹万宽, 许宇星, 黄润霞, 杜阿朋, 王志超. 雷州半岛桉树人工林生态系统水分利用效率旱雨季差异及其控制因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 2015-2029. |
| [6] | 李亚超, 张慧, 许珊珊, 李明, 马祥庆, 吴鹏飞. 低磷胁迫下外源挥发性有机化合物对杉木幼苗根系磷利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1744-1754. |
| [7] | 周红娟, 刘子赫, 刘柯言, 张初蕊, 胡旭, 韩璐, 陈立欣. 不同降雨条件下北京土石山区混生乔灌植物的水分吸收和生态位特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1089-1103. |
| [8] | 吴风燕, 吴永胜, 陈晓涵, 冯骥, 卢丽媛, 查斯娜, 王超宇, 孟元发, 尹强. 鄂尔多斯高原3种固沙灌木水分利用效率的时空变化特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1180-1191. |
| [9] | 王音, 同小娟, 张劲松, 李俊, 孟平, 刘沛荣, 张静茹. 干旱对栓皮栎人工林碳水通量及其耦合的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1157-1171. |
| [10] | 李蓓蓓, 张明军, 车存伟, 刘泽琛, 钟晓菲, 张园园, 张宇. 基于稳定同位素示踪的不同覆砂厚度下枣树水分利用策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1202-1212. |
| [11] | 耿雪琪, 唐亚坤, 王丽娜, 邓旭, 张泽凌, 周莹. 氮添加增加中国陆生植物生物量并降低其氮利用效率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 147-157. |
| [12] | 张智洋, 赵颖慧, 甄贞. 基于LUCC的1986-2022年松花江流域陆地生态系统碳储量动态监测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(10): 1274-1290. |
| [13] | 李伟斌, 张红霞, 张玉书, 陈妮娜. 昼夜不对称增温对长白山阔叶红松林碳汇能力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1225-1233. |
| [14] | 李伯新, 姜超, 孙建新. CMIP6模式对中国西南部地区植被碳利用率模拟能力综合评估[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1211-1224. |
| [15] | 张慧玲, 张耀艺, 彭清清, 杨静, 倪祥银, 吴福忠. 中亚热带同质园不同生活型树种微量元素重吸收效率的差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 978-987. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19