植物生态学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 167-177.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00015 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2014.00015
所属专题: 生物多样性
赵新风1, 徐海量1,2,*(
), 张鹏1, 涂文霞3, 张青青4
收稿日期:2013-01-21
接受日期:2013-08-09
出版日期:2014-01-21
发布日期:2014-02-12
作者简介:*(E-mail: xuhl@ms.xjb.ac.cn)基金资助:
ZHAO Xin-Feng1, XU Hai-Liang1,2,*(
), ZHANG Peng1, TU Wen-Xia3, ZHANG Qing-Qing4
Received:2013-01-21
Accepted:2013-08-09
Online:2014-01-21
Published:2014-02-12
摘要:
为进一步了解养分添加和水分添加对干旱区草地植物多样性的影响, 2009-2011年5月15日, 对准噶尔盆地荒漠草地进行养分和水分添加, 2009-2012年5月25日进行植被调查, 研究群落结构与植物多样性对养分N、P、K与水分(雨、雪)添加的响应, 得出以下结果: (1)添加肥、水后, 荒漠草地植物群落结构发生了变化, 物种数由肥、水添加前的17种减少到添加后的11种, 减少了35.3%, 禾草类植物数目增加, 十字花科植物数量下降; (2)通过裂区试验方差分析, 2009年和2010年, 养分主效应对物种丰富度、Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou均匀度指数的影响不显著, 水分主效应和肥水交互作用对以上4个植物多样性指数的影响也不显著; (3) 2012年, 养分主效应对物种丰富度影响显著(p < 0.05), 养分添加降低了荒漠草地物种丰富度, 而水分作用、肥水交互作用对物种丰富度的影响均不显著; 肥水交互作用对植物Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数的影响显著(p < 0.05), 而养分添加、水分添加对其影响亦不显著; (4)荒漠草地植物的Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou均匀度指数在年际间呈上升趋势。
赵新风, 徐海量, 张鹏, 涂文霞, 张青青. 养分与水分添加对荒漠草地植物群落结构和物种多样性的影响. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2): 167-177. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00015
ZHAO Xin-Feng, XU Hai-Liang, ZHANG Peng, TU Wen-Xia, ZHANG Qing-Qing. Effects of nutrient and water additions on plant community structure and species diversity in desert grasslands. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(2): 167-177. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00015
| 处理 Treatment | 施肥量 Fertilization amount |
|---|---|
| CK | 0 g |
| N | 771.4 g CaNO3 |
| P | 1 464.4 g Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O |
| K | 802.4 g K2SO4 + 538.4 g CaCO3 + 374.6 g MgCO3 + 3 043.6 g FeSO4·7H2O + 247.5 g MnSO4 + 158.3 g ZnSO4·7H2O + 141.5 g CuSO4·5H2O + 31.7 g Na2B4O7·10H2O + 9.0 g Na2MoO4·2H2O |
| NP | 771.4 g CaNO3 + 1 464.4 g Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O |
| NK | 771.4 g CaNO3 + 802.4 g K2SO4 + 538.4 g CaCO3 + 374.6 g MgCO3 + 3 043.6 g FeSO4·7H2O + 247.5 g MnSO4 + 158.3 g ZnSO4·7H2O + 141.5 g CuSO4·5H2O + 31.7 g Na2B4O7·10H2O + 9.0 g Na2MoO4·2H2O |
| PK | 1 464.4 g Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O + 802.4 g K2SO4 + 538.4 g CaCO3 + 374.6 g MgCO3 + 3 043.6 g FeSO4·7H2O + 247.5 g MnSO4 + 158.3 g ZnSO4·7H2O + 141.5 g CuSO4·5H2O + 31.7 g Na2B4O7·10H2O + 9.0 g Na2MoO4·2H2O |
| NPK | 771.4 g CaNO3 + 1 464.4 g Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O + 802.4 g K2SO4 + 538.4 g CaCO3 + 374.6 g MgCO3 + 3 043.6 g FeSO4·7H2O + 247.5 g MnSO4 + 158.3 g ZnSO4·7H2O + 141.5 g CuSO4·5H2O + 31.7 g Na2B4O7·10H2O + 9.0 g Na2MoO4·2H2O |
表1 每年每小区(6 m × 6 m)肥料施加量
Table 1 Amount of fertilizer in the experiment per plot (6 m × 6 m) per year
| 处理 Treatment | 施肥量 Fertilization amount |
|---|---|
| CK | 0 g |
| N | 771.4 g CaNO3 |
| P | 1 464.4 g Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O |
| K | 802.4 g K2SO4 + 538.4 g CaCO3 + 374.6 g MgCO3 + 3 043.6 g FeSO4·7H2O + 247.5 g MnSO4 + 158.3 g ZnSO4·7H2O + 141.5 g CuSO4·5H2O + 31.7 g Na2B4O7·10H2O + 9.0 g Na2MoO4·2H2O |
| NP | 771.4 g CaNO3 + 1 464.4 g Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O |
| NK | 771.4 g CaNO3 + 802.4 g K2SO4 + 538.4 g CaCO3 + 374.6 g MgCO3 + 3 043.6 g FeSO4·7H2O + 247.5 g MnSO4 + 158.3 g ZnSO4·7H2O + 141.5 g CuSO4·5H2O + 31.7 g Na2B4O7·10H2O + 9.0 g Na2MoO4·2H2O |
| PK | 1 464.4 g Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O + 802.4 g K2SO4 + 538.4 g CaCO3 + 374.6 g MgCO3 + 3 043.6 g FeSO4·7H2O + 247.5 g MnSO4 + 158.3 g ZnSO4·7H2O + 141.5 g CuSO4·5H2O + 31.7 g Na2B4O7·10H2O + 9.0 g Na2MoO4·2H2O |
| NPK | 771.4 g CaNO3 + 1 464.4 g Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O + 802.4 g K2SO4 + 538.4 g CaCO3 + 374.6 g MgCO3 + 3 043.6 g FeSO4·7H2O + 247.5 g MnSO4 + 158.3 g ZnSO4·7H2O + 141.5 g CuSO4·5H2O + 31.7 g Na2B4O7·10H2O + 9.0 g Na2MoO4·2H2O |
图1 一级与二级实验处理方案。阿拉伯数字表示不同样地的编号; A、B、C、D分别表示每一个样地内的对照、预留、增雨、增雪处理。
Fig. 1 Primary and secondary treatments of the experimental schemes. Arabic numerals represent the different numbers of sample plots; A, B, C, D represent the treatments of control, reservation, rain addition, and snow addition for each sample plot, respectively.
| 指标 Index | df | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| 物种丰富度 Species richness | 7 | 1.23 | 0.36 |
| Simpson指数 Simpson index | 7 | 0.20 | 0.98 |
| Shannon-Wiener指数 Shannon-Wiener index | 7 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
| Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 7 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
表2 2009年养分添加对物种丰富度、Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou均匀度指数影响的方差分析结果(p = 0.05)
Table 2 ANOVA results of effects of nutrient addition on species richness, Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index, and Pielou evenness index in 2009 (p = 0.05)
| 指标 Index | df | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| 物种丰富度 Species richness | 7 | 1.23 | 0.36 |
| Simpson指数 Simpson index | 7 | 0.20 | 0.98 |
| Shannon-Wiener指数 Shannon-Wiener index | 7 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
| Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index | 7 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
图2 肥水添加后禾本科(A)与十字花科(B)植物个体数(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, K, N, NK, NP, NPK, P, PK, 见表1。不同的字母表示处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 2 Individual number of plant in Poaceae (A) and Cruciferae (B) after nutrient and water additions (mean ± SD). CK, K, N, NK, NP, NPK, P, PK, see Table 1. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
| 差异来源 Difference source | df | 物种丰富度 | Simpson指数 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | Pielou均匀度指数 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species richness | Simpson index | Shannon-Wiener index | Pielou evenness index | ||||||||||
| F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||||||
| 养分处理 Nutrient treatment (A) | 7, 21 | 0.67 | 0.693 | 0.47 | 0.844 | 0.53 | 0.804 | 0.55 | 0.789 | ||||
| 水分处理 Water treatment (B) | 2, 48 | 2.86 | 0.067 | 0.24 | 0.784 | 0.60 | 0.553 | 0.05 | 0.949 | ||||
| A、B互作 Interaction of A and B | 14, 48 | 0.78 | 0.689 | 0.47 | 0.983 | 0.55 | 0.892 | 0.43 | 0.959 | ||||
| 区组 Block | 3, 21 | 0.58 | 0.637 | 1.06 | 0.386 | 0.78 | 0.521 | 1.09 | 0.377 | ||||
表3 2010年养分与水分添加对物种丰富度、Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou均匀度指数影响的方差分析结果(p = 0.05)
Table 3 ANOVA results of effects of nutrient and water additions on species richness, Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index, and Pielou evenness index in 2010 (p = 0.05)
| 差异来源 Difference source | df | 物种丰富度 | Simpson指数 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | Pielou均匀度指数 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species richness | Simpson index | Shannon-Wiener index | Pielou evenness index | ||||||||||
| F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||||||
| 养分处理 Nutrient treatment (A) | 7, 21 | 0.67 | 0.693 | 0.47 | 0.844 | 0.53 | 0.804 | 0.55 | 0.789 | ||||
| 水分处理 Water treatment (B) | 2, 48 | 2.86 | 0.067 | 0.24 | 0.784 | 0.60 | 0.553 | 0.05 | 0.949 | ||||
| A、B互作 Interaction of A and B | 14, 48 | 0.78 | 0.689 | 0.47 | 0.983 | 0.55 | 0.892 | 0.43 | 0.959 | ||||
| 区组 Block | 3, 21 | 0.58 | 0.637 | 1.06 | 0.386 | 0.78 | 0.521 | 1.09 | 0.377 | ||||
| 差异来源 Difference source | df | 物种丰富度 | Simpson指数 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | Pielou均匀度指数 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species richness | Simpson index | Shannon-Wiener index | Pielou evenness index | ||||||||||
| F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||||||
| 养分处理 Nutrient treatment (A) | 7, 21 | 2.99* | 0.024 | 0.84 | 0.567 | 0.80 | 0.594 | 0.96 | 0.487 | ||||
| 水分处理 Water treatment (B) | 2, 48 | 2.15 | 0.128 | 2.05 | 0.141 | 1.09 | 0.343 | 2.25 | 0.117 | ||||
| A、B互作 Interaction of A and B | 14, 48 | 0.52 | 0.910 | 1.87* | 0.049 | 2.17* | 0.024 | 1.68 | 0.092 | ||||
| 区组 Block | 3, 21 | 3.68* | 0.028 | 2.79 | 0.660 | 3.45* | 0.035 | 4.23* | 0.002 | ||||
表4 2012年养分与水分添加对物种丰富度、Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou均匀度指数影响的方差分析结果
Table 4 ANOVA results of effects of nutrient and water additions on species richness, Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index, and Pielou evenness index in 2012
| 差异来源 Difference source | df | 物种丰富度 | Simpson指数 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | Pielou均匀度指数 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species richness | Simpson index | Shannon-Wiener index | Pielou evenness index | ||||||||||
| F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||||||
| 养分处理 Nutrient treatment (A) | 7, 21 | 2.99* | 0.024 | 0.84 | 0.567 | 0.80 | 0.594 | 0.96 | 0.487 | ||||
| 水分处理 Water treatment (B) | 2, 48 | 2.15 | 0.128 | 2.05 | 0.141 | 1.09 | 0.343 | 2.25 | 0.117 | ||||
| A、B互作 Interaction of A and B | 14, 48 | 0.52 | 0.910 | 1.87* | 0.049 | 2.17* | 0.024 | 1.68 | 0.092 | ||||
| 区组 Block | 3, 21 | 3.68* | 0.028 | 2.79 | 0.660 | 3.45* | 0.035 | 4.23* | 0.002 | ||||
图3 2012年不增雨、不增雪条件下养分添加后的物种丰富度(平均值±标准偏差)。图注同图2。
Fig. 3 Species richness in nutrient addition experiment without rain and snow additions in 2012 (mean ± SD). Notes see Fig. 2.
图4 2012年增雨(A)及增雪(B)条件下养分添加后的物种丰富度(平均值±标准偏差)。图注同图2。
Fig. 4 Species richness in nutrient addition experiment with rain (A) and snow (B) additions in 2012 (mean ± SD). Notes see Fig. 2.
图5 2012年养分添加及增雨条件下的Simpson指数(A)和Shannon-Wiener指数(B) (平均值±标准偏差)。图注同图2。
Fig. 5 Simpson index (A) and Shannon-Wiener index (B) in nutrient addition with rain addition in 2012 (mean ± SD). Notes see Fig. 2.
图6 2012年养分添加及增雪条件下的Simpson指数(A)和Shannon-Wiener指数(B) (平均值±标准偏差)。图注同图2。
Fig. 6 Simpson index (A) and Shannon-Wiener (B) index in nutrient addition with snow addition in 2012 (mean ± SD). Notes see Fig. 2.
图7 2012年养分添加后在不增雨、不增雪条件下的Simpson指数(A)和Shannon-Wiener指数(B) (平均值±标准偏差)。图注同图2。
Fig. 7 Simpson index (A) and Shannon-Wiener index (B) in nutrient addition without rain and snow additions in 2012 (mean ± SD). Notes see Fig. 2.
图8 2009、2010、2012年的Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数和Pielou均匀度指数(平均值±标准偏差)。图注同图2。
Fig. 8 Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index, and Pielou evenness index in 2009, 2010, and 2012 (mean ± SD). Notes see Fig. 2.
| [1] | Bakelaar RG, Odum EP (1978). Community and population level responses to fertilization in an old-field ecosystem. Ecology, 59, 660-665. |
| [2] | Bedford LB, Walbridge MR, Allison A (1999). Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate north American wetlands. Ecology, 80, 2151-2169. |
| [3] | Carson WP, Barrett GW (1988). Succession in old-field plant communities: effects of contrasting types of nutrient enrichment. Ecology, 69, 984-994. |
| [4] | Chen YM, Li ZZ, Du GZ (2004). Effects of fertilization on plant diversity and economic herbage groups in alpine meadow. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 24, 424-429. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 陈亚明, 李自珍, 杜国祯 (2004). 施肥对高寒草甸植物多样性和经济类群的影响. 西北植物学报, 24, 424-429.] | |
| [5] | Foster BL, Gross KL (1998). Species richness in a successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter. Ecology, 79, 2593-2602. |
| [6] | Goldberg DE, Miller TE (1990). Effects of different resource additions of species diversity in an annual plant community. Ecology, 71, 213-225. |
| [7] | Gough L, Grace JB (1998). Herbivore effects on plant species density at varying productivity levels. Ecology, 79, 1586-1594. |
| [8] | Gough L, Osenberg CW, Gross KL, Collins SL (2000). Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos, 89, 428-439. |
| [9] | Guo YS (2011). The Influence of Nitrogen on Plant Diversity in Xinjiang Desert Grassland. Master degree dissertation, Shihezi University, Shihezi. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 郭永盛 (2011). 施氮肥对新疆荒漠草原生物多样性的影响. 硕士学位论文, 石河子大学, 石河子.] | |
| [10] | Huberty LE, Gross KL, Miller CJ (1998). Effects of nitrogen addition on successional dynamics and species diversity in Michigan old-fields. Journal of Ecology, 86, 794-803. |
| [11] | Jiang XL, Zhang WG, Yang ZY, Wang G (2003). The influence of disturbance on community structure and plant diversity of alpine meadow. Acta Botanica Boreali- Occidentalia Sinica, 23, 1479-1485. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 江小蕾, 张卫国, 杨振宇, 王刚 (2003). 不同干扰类型对高寒草甸群落结构和植物多样性的影响. 西北植物学报, 23, 1479-1485.] | |
| [12] | Kempton RA (1979). The structure of species abundance and measurement of diversity. Biometrics, 35, 307-321. |
| [13] | Li B, Yang C, Lin P (2000). Ecology. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
| [ 李博, 杨持, 林鹏 (2000). 生态学. 高等教育出版社, 北京.] | |
| [14] | Li DL, Wei L, Cai Y, Zhang CJ, Feng JY, Yang Q, Yuan YJ, Dong AX (2003). The present facts and the future tendency of the climate change in Northwest China. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 25, 135-142. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 李栋梁, 魏丽, 蔡英, 张存杰, 冯建英, 杨青, 袁玉江, 董安祥 (2003). 中国西北现代气候变化事实与未来趋势展望. 冰川冻土, 25, 135-142.] | |
| [15] | Li ZJ, Liu CD, Yang ZW, He JY, Lin P (2000). Studies on the species diversity of the closed stable forest and the disturbed forest of Castanopsis eyrei in Wuyishan National Nature Reserve. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24, 64-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 李振基, 刘初钿, 杨志伟, 何建源, 林鹏 (2000). 武夷山自然保护区郁闭稳定甜槠林与人为干扰甜槠林物种多样性比较. 植物生态学报, 24, 64-68.] | |
| [16] | Luo YJ, Zhou JJ, Wang HY, Ma JY, Du GZ (2004). The relation of nutrients and plant species diversity in an alpine meadow. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 40(2), 84-91. |
| [17] | Ma KP (1994). Biological community diversity measure method I α diversity measure method. Biodiversity Science, 2, 162-168. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 马克平 (1994). 生物群落多样性的测度方法I α多样性的测度方法(上). 生物多样性, 2, 162-168.] | |
| [18] | Ma T, Tong YF, Liu JX, Wu GL, Liu ZH (2008). Relationships of species diversity and productivity under the fertilization levels in alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Grassland and Turf,( 4), 34-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 马涛, 童云峰, 刘锦霞, 武高林, 刘振恒 (2008). 不同施肥处理高寒草甸植物群落物种多样性与生产力的关系. 草原与草坪, ( 4), 34-38.] | |
| [19] | Richardson CJ, Ferrell GM, Vaithiyanathan P (1999). Nutrient effects on stand structure, resorption efficiency, and secondary compounds in everglades sawgrass. Ecology, 80, 2182-2192. |
| [20] | Shen JL, Tan G, Qiao HL, Zhang JH, Meng Y (2000). Study on effect of grassland improvement on alpine degraded grassland vegetation. Grassland of China,( 5), 49-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 沈景林, 谭刚, 乔海龙, 张娟华, 孟杨 (2000). 草地改良对高寒退化草地植被影响的研究. 中国草地, ( 5), 49-54.] | |
| [21] | Shi YF, Shen YP, Hu RJ (2002). Preliminary study on signal, impact and foreground of climatic shift from warm-dry to warm-humid in Northwest China. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 24, 219-226. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 施雅风, 沈永平, 胡汝骥 (2002). 西北气候由暖干向暖湿转型的信号、影响和前景初步探讨. 冰川冻土, 24, 219-226.] | |
| [22] | Sun RY, Li B, Zhu GY, Shang YC (1993). General Ecology. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
| [ 孙儒泳, 李博, 诸葛阳, 尚玉昌 (1993). 普通生态学. 高等教育出版社, 北京.] | |
| [23] | Theodose TA, Bowman WD (1997). Nutrient availability, plant abundance, and species diversity in two alpine tundra communities. Ecology, 78, 1861-1872. |
| [24] | Tilman D (1977). Resource competition between plankton algae: an experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology, 58, 338-348. |
| [25] | Tilman D (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton. |
| [26] | Tilman D (1993). Species richness of experimental productivity gradients: How important is colonization limitation? Ecology, 74, 2179-2191. |
| [27] | Wang DW, Wen ZH, Wen HD, Du LJ (1998). Effect of fertilizer application on rape leguminous pasture in cold semi arid region of high elevation. Acta Pratacultural Science, 7(4), 25-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 王殿武, 文振海, 文宏达, 杜连军 (1998). 高寒半干旱区油菜与豆科牧草混播草地施肥效应. 草业学报, 7(4), 25-31.] | |
| [28] | Whittaker RH (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21, 213-251. |
| [29] |
Wilson SD, Tilman D (1991). Interactive effects of fertilization and disturbance on community structure and resource availability in an old-field plant community. Oecologia, 88, 61-71.
URL PMID |
| [30] | Zeng DH, Li LJ, Fahey TJ, Yu ZY, Fan ZP, Chen FS (2010). Effects of nitrogen addition on vegetation and ecosystem carbon in a semi-arid grassland. Biogeochemistry, 98, 185-193. |
| [31] | Zhang YD, Shen YX, Liu WY (2004). Fertilization effects of N, P on a grass community at the dry valley of Jinsha River. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 24, 59-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 张彦东, 沈有信, 刘文耀 (2004). 金沙江干旱河谷退化草地群落对氮磷施肥的反应. 植物研究, 24, 59-64.] | |
| [32] | Zheng HP, Chen ZX, Wang SR, Niu JY (2007). Effects of fertilizer on plant diversity and productivity of desertified alpine grassland at Maqu, Gansu. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 16(5), 34-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 郑华平, 陈子萱, 王生荣, 牛俊义 (2007). 施肥对玛曲高寒沙化草地植物多样性和生产力的影响. 草业学报, 16(5), 34-39.] |
| [1] | 何青, 袁旭东, 任博申, 冯治洋, 鲁梦珍, 林巧玲, 姜庆虎, 杨林森, 余辉亮, 姚辉, 杨敬元, 刘峰, 江明喜. 一年蓬(Erigeron annuus)入侵对亚高山泥炭湿地植物群落结构与多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [2] | 叶学敏, 高伟, 唐星林, 陈伏生, 孙荣喜, 罗坤水. 氮磷添加对常绿阔叶林幼树叶片植食损伤的影响及调控机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 256-267. |
| [3] | 李家湘, 刘文倩, 蒋国平, 赵丽娟, 徐永福, 吴磊, 喻勋林. 植被科学画符号系统设计和标准化绘图范式——以森林群落剖面图为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 897-910. |
| [4] | 惠城阳, 章巧依, 刘腾腾, 刘维勇, 周丽娜, 金鑫杰, 张永华, 刘金亮. 温州大罗山主要植被类型及物种组成特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 990-998. |
| [5] | 何斌, 韩鹏宾, 唐勤. 中国铁坚油杉林的群落类型及特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 833-839. |
| [6] | 杜燕, 刘鑫, 张瀚曰, 马少伟, 包维楷. 中国高山松群系的群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 816-824. |
| [7] | 马富龙, 王雨晴, 郝瑜, 段继超, 刘霏霏, 席琳乔, 韩路. 海拔梯度对昆仑山北坡中部草原植物与土壤微生物群落结构与多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 732-747. |
| [8] | 杜华栋, 王梦雨, 聂文杰, 孙浩, 车旭曦, 唐勋. 半干旱矿区塌陷地光伏电站建设对植物群落特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1778-1790. |
| [9] | 郭欢敏, 沈小雪, 李瑞利. 深圳湾福田红树林自然保护区物种共存特征与物种分布概率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1833-1843. |
| [10] | 韦丹丹, 杜燕, 包维楷, 胡斌, 张瀚曰, 王瀚婕, 唐圆圆, 黄龙, 郭昌安, 刘鑫. 冬麻豆群落的地理分布、特征和分类[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1698-1709. |
| [11] | 郝毅晴, 刘伟, 杨阳, 安冰儿, 范冰, 李超, 崔久辉, 程延彬, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 有机肥和无机肥对退化草原羊草种群密度和个体生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 148-158. |
| [12] | 马东峰, 贾存智, 王学朋, 赵鹏鹏, 胡小文. 甘南高寒退化草甸多物种组配的修复效果评估[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 93-102. |
| [13] | 刘瑶, 钟全林, 徐朝斌, 程栋梁, 郑跃芳, 邹宇星, 张雪, 郑新杰, 周云若. 不同大小刨花楠细根功能性状与根际微环境关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(6): 744-759. |
| [14] | 牛一迪, 蔡体久. 大兴安岭北部次生林演替过程中物种多样性的变化及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 349-363. |
| [15] | 李娜, 唐士明, 郭建英, 田茹, 王姗, 胡冰, 罗永红, 徐柱文. 放牧对内蒙古草地植物群落特征影响的meta分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1256-1269. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19