植物生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 187-194.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00187 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2011.00187
收稿日期:2010-03-18
接受日期:2010-07-02
出版日期:2011-03-18
发布日期:2011-01-21
作者简介:*E-mail: lijq@bjfu.edu.cn
WANG Chuan-Hua1,2, LI Jun-Qing1,*(
), CHEN Fang-Qing2, YANG Ying1
Received:2010-03-18
Accepted:2010-07-02
Online:2011-03-18
Published:2011-01-21
摘要:
深入理解幼苗更新的生态过程及其限制因子是植物种群保育和森林管理的基础。在鄂东南的低丘地区, 采用控制试验研究了限制枫香(Liquidambar formosana)幼苗在其自身林下更新的生态因子。由于枫香幼苗在马尾松(Pinus massoniana)林下偶尔更新良好, 在枫香林下几乎没有更新, 以马尾松林为对照, 设计了4个试验来检验: (1)低温和土壤湿度对枫香种子储藏过程中寿命的影响, (2)两种林型的土壤、凋落物对枫香种子越冬及存活的影响, (3)凋落物对枫香种子萌发是否具有化感作用, (4)林下的光强变化是否影响幼苗的存活。结果表明, 枫香种子在很低的温度下仍可以立即萌发, 这表明枫香种子没有休眠特性是影响枫香幼苗更新的重要因子; 土壤、凋落物和凋落物滤液对种子越冬后的存活没有影响, 不能解释“枫香林下没有枫香苗”的问题; 两种林型的主要凋落物滤液对枫香种子萌发没有抑制作用或促进作用; 一年生枫香幼苗遮阴试验的结果表明, 3%透光率下幼苗的死亡率接近90%。因此枫香林下弱的光环境和种子的低温萌发特性是影响枫香幼苗更新的重要因子。
王传华, 李俊清, 陈芳清, 杨莹. 鄂东南低丘地区枫香林下枫香幼苗更新限制因子. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(2): 187-194. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00187
WANG Chuan-Hua, LI Jun-Qing, CHEN Fang-Qing, YANG Ying. Factors affecting seedling regeneration of Liquidambar formosana in the L. formosana forests in hilly regions of Southeast Hubei, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(2): 187-194. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00187
| 未萌发种子的活性 Viability of seeds remaining un-germinated (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-02-01 | 2009-03-01 | 2009-04-01 | 2009-05-01 | 2009-06-01 | ||
| 温度 T (℃) | 4 | 82.6a | 79.0a | 46.7a | 23.2a | 6.6b |
| 8 | 86.4a | 65.0b | 0.1b | 5.7b | 0.1a | |
| 12 | 70.1b | 44.4c | 1.4c | 0.2c | 1.2a | |
| 土壤湿度 H (%) | 15 | 83.8ns | 65.4ab | 22.5b | 12.9c | 3.1ab |
| 25 | 80.5ns | 66.5b | 24.9b | 16.9c | 5.2b | |
| 45 | 76.3ns | 58.6a | 12.8a | 2.7a | 0.6a | |
| 80 | 78.1ns | 60.9a | 21.6b | 6.4b | 1.7ab | |
| T × H相互作用 T × H interaction | s | s | s | s | s | |
| T × H处理 T × H treatment | 4 × 15 | 86.3c | 67.3c | 30.5d | 20.9d | 9.2c |
| 4 × 25 | 84.9ef | 82.9ef | 67.1e | 49.1e | 13.2c | |
| 4 × 45 | 73.2de | 78.1cde | 28.2d | 7.2c | 0.7ab | |
| 4 × 80 | 86.0f | 87.8f | 60.9e | 15.7d | 3.4b | |
| 8 × 15 | 88.9cd | 70.3cd | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| 8 × 25 | 85.5c | 66.4c | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| 8 × 45 | 86.6bc | 61.7bc | 0a | 0a | 0.3a | |
| 8 × 80 | 84.5bc | 61.8bc | 0.3a | 0.8ab | 0.3a | |
| 12 × 15 | 76.4bc | 58.6bc | 37.0d | 17.7d | 0a | |
| 12 × 25 | 71.1b | 50.1a | 7.5bc | 1.6ab | 2.6ab | |
| 12 × 45 | 69.2a | 35.9a | 10.2c | 0.8ab | 0.9a | |
| 12 × 80 | 63.8a | 32.9a | 3.4b | 2.7bc | 1.5ab | |
表1 温度(T)和土壤湿度(H)对枫香种子活性的影响
Table 1 Effects of temperature (T) and soil moisture (H) on the viability of Liquidambar fomosana seeds
| 未萌发种子的活性 Viability of seeds remaining un-germinated (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-02-01 | 2009-03-01 | 2009-04-01 | 2009-05-01 | 2009-06-01 | ||
| 温度 T (℃) | 4 | 82.6a | 79.0a | 46.7a | 23.2a | 6.6b |
| 8 | 86.4a | 65.0b | 0.1b | 5.7b | 0.1a | |
| 12 | 70.1b | 44.4c | 1.4c | 0.2c | 1.2a | |
| 土壤湿度 H (%) | 15 | 83.8ns | 65.4ab | 22.5b | 12.9c | 3.1ab |
| 25 | 80.5ns | 66.5b | 24.9b | 16.9c | 5.2b | |
| 45 | 76.3ns | 58.6a | 12.8a | 2.7a | 0.6a | |
| 80 | 78.1ns | 60.9a | 21.6b | 6.4b | 1.7ab | |
| T × H相互作用 T × H interaction | s | s | s | s | s | |
| T × H处理 T × H treatment | 4 × 15 | 86.3c | 67.3c | 30.5d | 20.9d | 9.2c |
| 4 × 25 | 84.9ef | 82.9ef | 67.1e | 49.1e | 13.2c | |
| 4 × 45 | 73.2de | 78.1cde | 28.2d | 7.2c | 0.7ab | |
| 4 × 80 | 86.0f | 87.8f | 60.9e | 15.7d | 3.4b | |
| 8 × 15 | 88.9cd | 70.3cd | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| 8 × 25 | 85.5c | 66.4c | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| 8 × 45 | 86.6bc | 61.7bc | 0a | 0a | 0.3a | |
| 8 × 80 | 84.5bc | 61.8bc | 0.3a | 0.8ab | 0.3a | |
| 12 × 15 | 76.4bc | 58.6bc | 37.0d | 17.7d | 0a | |
| 12 × 25 | 71.1b | 50.1a | 7.5bc | 1.6ab | 2.6ab | |
| 12 × 45 | 69.2a | 35.9a | 10.2c | 0.8ab | 0.9a | |
| 12 × 80 | 63.8a | 32.9a | 3.4b | 2.7bc | 1.5ab | |
| 变异来源 Variation source | 自由度 df | 平方和 SS | 均方 MS | F值 F value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 主处理 Main treatment | 区组 Block | 9 | 4 283.65 | 475.96 | 4.36* |
| 林型 Forest type | 1 | 37.89 | 37.89 | 0.35 | |
| 误差(林型) Eforest | 9 | 981.71 | 109.08 | ||
| 亚处理 Sub treatment | 处理 Treatment | 4 | 125 643.99 | 31 411.00 | 207.55** |
| 处理×林型 Treatment × forest type | 4 | 4 231.35 | 1 057.84 | 6.99** | |
| 误差 E | 71 | 10 745.37 | 151.34 | ||
表2 林型和种子埋藏对枫香种子越冬后活性影响的ANOVA分析
Table 2 ANOVA analysis of the effect of forest type and seed sowing on Liquidambar fomosana seed viability through winter
| 变异来源 Variation source | 自由度 df | 平方和 SS | 均方 MS | F值 F value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 主处理 Main treatment | 区组 Block | 9 | 4 283.65 | 475.96 | 4.36* |
| 林型 Forest type | 1 | 37.89 | 37.89 | 0.35 | |
| 误差(林型) Eforest | 9 | 981.71 | 109.08 | ||
| 亚处理 Sub treatment | 处理 Treatment | 4 | 125 643.99 | 31 411.00 | 207.55** |
| 处理×林型 Treatment × forest type | 4 | 4 231.35 | 1 057.84 | 6.99** | |
| 误差 E | 71 | 10 745.37 | 151.34 | ||
| 处理 Treatment | 处理1 Treatment 1 (%) | 处理2 Treatment 2 (%) | 处理3 Treatment 3 (%) | 处理4 Treatment 4 (%) | 处理5 Treatment 5 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 Mean | 81.26A | 85.41A | 7.70B | 13.55B | 7.45B |
表3 林型和种子埋藏对枫香种子越冬后活性的影响
Table 3 Effect of forest type and seed sowing on the viability of Liquidambar fomosana seeds through winter
| 处理 Treatment | 处理1 Treatment 1 (%) | 处理2 Treatment 2 (%) | 处理3 Treatment 3 (%) | 处理4 Treatment 4 (%) | 处理5 Treatment 5 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 Mean | 81.26A | 85.41A | 7.70B | 13.55B | 7.45B |
| 处理 Treatment | 逐日萌发率 Germination per day (%) | 合计 Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd day | 4th day | 5th day | 6th day | ||
| DW | 12.4c | 28.8bc | 27.2b | 11.0a | 89.4ns |
| LQ | 16.2c | 31.2c | 23.2ab | 10.2a | 89.2ns |
| LS | 1.2a | 12.6a | 21.4a | 21.8b | 87.6ns |
| NP | 2.4ab | 12.2a | 29.0b | 22.0b | 84.0ns |
| CS | 3.2b | 25.4b | 25.2ab | 18.0b | 90.8ns |
表4 凋落物滤液对枫香种子萌发的影响
Table 4 Effect of litter leachate on the germination of Liquidambar fomosana seeds
| 处理 Treatment | 逐日萌发率 Germination per day (%) | 合计 Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd day | 4th day | 5th day | 6th day | ||
| DW | 12.4c | 28.8bc | 27.2b | 11.0a | 89.4ns |
| LQ | 16.2c | 31.2c | 23.2ab | 10.2a | 89.2ns |
| LS | 1.2a | 12.6a | 21.4a | 21.8b | 87.6ns |
| NP | 2.4ab | 12.2a | 29.0b | 22.0b | 84.0ns |
| CS | 3.2b | 25.4b | 25.2ab | 18.0b | 90.8ns |
| 处理 Treatment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 Mean (%) | Sand + LS | Sand + CS | Sand + NP | Sand + LQ | Sand + DW | Soil-S + DW | Soil-P + DW |
| 23.4c | 27.8c | 13.7b | 23.0c | 10.6ab | 7.5a | 16.6b | |
表5 凋落物滤液对埋藏枫香种子活性的影响
Table 5 Effect of litter leachate on viability of buried seeds of Liquidambar formosana
| 处理 Treatment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 Mean (%) | Sand + LS | Sand + CS | Sand + NP | Sand + LQ | Sand + DW | Soil-S + DW | Soil-P + DW |
| 23.4c | 27.8c | 13.7b | 23.0c | 10.6ab | 7.5a | 16.6b | |
图1 遮阴对枫香幼苗存活比例的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。不同的字母表示在0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 1 Shade effect on the survival of Liquidambar formosana seedlings (mean ± SD). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
| [1] | Ahmed R, Hoque ATMR, Hossain MK (2008). Allelopathic effects of leaf litters of Eucalyptus camaldulensis on some forest and agricultural crops. Journal of Forestry Research, 19, 19-24. |
| [2] | Al-Humaid AI, Warrag MOA (1998). Allelopathic effects of mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) foliage on seed germination and seedling growth of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Journal of Arid Environments, 38, 237-243. |
| [3] |
Anders JD, Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC (1996). Effects of bilberry ( Vaccinium myrtillus L.) litter on seed germination and early seedling growth of four boreal tree species. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22, 973-986.
DOI URL PMID |
| [4] | Augspurger CK (1984). Seedling survival of tropical tree species, interactions on dispersal distance, light gaps, and pathogens. Ecology, 65, 1705-1712. |
| [5] | Bonner FT (1972). Maturation of sweet gum and American sycamore seeds. Forest Science, 18, 223-231. |
| [6] | Bonner FT (1987). Collection and care of sweet gum seed. New Forest, 207-214. |
| [7] | Burtern PJ, Bazzaz FA (1991). Tree seedling emergence on interactive temperature and moisture gradients and in patches of old-field vegetation. American Journal of Botany, 78, 131-149. |
| [8] |
Castells E, Uelas JP, Valentine DW (2005). Effects of plant leachates from four boreal understorey species on soil mineralization, and white spruce ( Picea glauca) germination and seedling growth. Annals of Botany, 95, 1247-1252.
DOI URL PMID |
| [9] | Cavieres LA, Chacon P, Penaloza A, Molina-Montenegro M, Arroyo MTK (2007). Leaf litter of Kageneckia angustifolia D. Don (Rosaceae) inhibits seed germination in sclerophyllous montane woodlands of central Chile. Plant Ecology, 190, 13-22. |
| [10] | China Forest Compiler Committee (中国森林编辑委员会) (1999). China Forest III (中国森林第3卷). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. 1431-1434. (in Chinese) |
| [11] | Dupuy JM, Chazdon RL (2008). Interacting effects of canopy gap, understory vegetation and leaf litter on tree seedling recruitment and composition in tropical secondary forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 3716-3725. |
| [12] | Ellis RH, Roberts EH (1980). Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Annals of Botany, 45, 13-30. |
| [13] | Fenner M (2000). Seeds: the Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire. |
| [14] | Gao HD (高捍东), Chen FM (陈凤毛), Shi JS (施季森) (2000). A study on maturation of Liquidambar formosana seeds. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (南京林业大学学报), 24, 26-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [15] | Hadar Y, Harman GE, Taylor AG (1984). Evaluation of Trichoderma koningii and T. harzianum from New York soils for biological control of seed rot caused by Pythium spp. Phytopathology, 74, 106-110. |
| [16] | Han LF (韩麟凤), Xu SH (许绍惠), Tang WP (唐婉屏), Han ZH (韩忠环) (1983). Primary test report on Juglans mandshurica Maxim. allelopathy. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology (辽宁林业科技), (4), 44-49. (in Chinese) |
| [17] | Li QK, Ma KP (2003). Factors affecting establishment of Quercus liaotungensis Koidz under mature mixed oak forest over story and in shrub land. Forest Ecology and Management, 176, 133-146. |
| [18] | Liu J (刘就), Liu HP (刘和平), Chen KK (陈考科), Deng ST (邓石亭) (2007). The research progress on the seed characters of Liquidambar formosana. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology (福建林业科技), 34, 190-192. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [19] | Lusk CH, Warton DI (2007). Global meta-analysis shows that relationships of leaf mass per area with species shade tolerance depend on leaf habit and ontogeny. New Phytologist, 176, 764-774. |
| [20] | Lusk CH (2004). Leaf area and growth of juvenile temperate evergreens in low light, species of contrasting shade tolerance change rank during ontogeny. Functional Ecology, 18, 820-828. |
| [21] | Rey A, Petsikos C, Jarvis PG, Grace J (2005). Effect of temperature and moisture on rates of carbon mineralization in a Mediterranean oak forest soil under controlled and field conditions. European Journal of Soil Science, 56, 589-599. |
| [22] | Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (2000). Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiment 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York. 47. |
| [23] | Walters MB, Reich PB (2000). Seed size, nitrogen supply, and growth rate affect tree seedling survival in deep shade. Ecology, 81, 1887-1901. |
| [24] | Wang CH (王传华), Wei B (魏斌), Li JQ (李俊清) (2009a). Community structure and seedlings regeneration of Chinese sweetgum (Liquidambar formosana) forest and pine (Pinus massoniana)-sweetgum mixed forest in the southeast hilly region, Hubei Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 4681-4692. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [25] | Wang CH (王传华), Yang Y (杨莹), Li JQ (李俊清) (2009b). Natural regeneration of Chinese sweet-gum (Liquidambar formosana) population in southeast hilly region of Hubei Province. Chinese Bulletin of Botany (植物学报), 44, 710-717. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [26] | Wang GG, Kemball KJ (2005). Balsam fir and white spruce seedling recruitment in response to under story release, seedbed type, and litter exclusion in trembling aspen stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 667-673. |
| [27] | Xishui County Annals Edit Committee (浠水县志编辑委员会) (1996). Xishui County Annals (浠水县志). China Culture History Press, Beijing. 1-8. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 张琨, 钱敏, 汪阳, 李志华, 孔令娜, 李明洋, 马瑾煜, 努尔艾合麦提•玉苏普, 陈乙一, 成沂芮, 张焕仕, 覃凤飞, 渠晖. 紫花苜蓿耐阴性综合评价及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 773-787. |
| [2] | 翟江维, 林馨慧, 武瑞哲, 徐义昕, 靳豪豪, 金光泽, 刘志理. 小兴安岭不同功能型阔叶植物的柄叶权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 700-711. |
| [3] | 彭鑫, 金光泽. 植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 656-666. |
| [4] | 何庆海, 杨少宗, 李因刚, 沈鑫, 柳新红. 枫香树种群种子与果实表型性状变异分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 752-763. |
| [5] | 刘佳, 项文化, 徐晓, 陈瑞, 田大伦, 彭长辉, 方晰. 湖南会同5个亚热带树种的细根构型及功能特征分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(8): 938-945. |
| [6] | 王凯, 朱教君, 于立忠, 孙一荣, 陈光华. 遮阴对黄波罗幼苗的光合特性及光能利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(5): 1003-1012. |
| [7] | 裴保华, 郭进起, 张素菊. “741杨”扦插苗耐阴性的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(3): 272-278. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19