Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 47-54.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00047
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANG Yang-Ming1(), CUI Wei-Hong1, DONG Qian-Lin2
Received:
2011-05-24
Accepted:
2011-08-01
Online:
2012-05-24
Published:
2012-01-05
JIANG Yang-Ming, CUI Wei-Hong, DONG Qian-Lin. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of tobacco planting environment based on space technology[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(1): 47-54.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00047
Fig. 1 Ecological environment comprehensive evaluation process of tobacco planting based on space technology. MODIS: moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer; SRTM: Shuttle Radar Topography Mission.
A | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B1 | C1 | C2 | B2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | B3 | C6 | C7 | B4 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | C1 | 1 | 2 | C3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | C6 | 1 | 5 | C8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
B2 | 1/4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | C2 | 1/2 | 1 | C4 | 1/3 | 1 | 2 | C7 | 1/5 | 1 | C9 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
B3 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | C5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | C10 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
B4 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | C11 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 |
Table 1 Hierarchy analytic process matrix
A | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B1 | C1 | C2 | B2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | B3 | C6 | C7 | B4 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | C1 | 1 | 2 | C3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | C6 | 1 | 5 | C8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
B2 | 1/4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | C2 | 1/2 | 1 | C4 | 1/3 | 1 | 2 | C7 | 1/5 | 1 | C9 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
B3 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | C5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | C10 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
B4 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | C11 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 |
A-B | B1-Ci | B2-Ci | B3-Ci | B4-Ci |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bi | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci(K) | Ci (K) |
0.487 2 | 0.666 7 | 0.593 6 | 0.833 3 | 0.482 9 |
0.183 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.249 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.272 0 |
0.116 4 | 0.157 1 | 0.157 0 | ||
0.213 1 | 0.088 1 | |||
λmax = 4.096 8 | λmax = 2.000 0 | λmax = 3.053 6 | λmax=2.000 0 | λmax=4.014 5 |
Table 2 Largest eigenvalue and eigenvectors of Matrix
A-B | B1-Ci | B2-Ci | B3-Ci | B4-Ci |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bi | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci(K) | Ci (K) |
0.487 2 | 0.666 7 | 0.593 6 | 0.833 3 | 0.482 9 |
0.183 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.249 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.272 0 |
0.116 4 | 0.157 1 | 0.157 0 | ||
0.213 1 | 0.088 1 | |||
λmax = 4.096 8 | λmax = 2.000 0 | λmax = 3.053 6 | λmax=2.000 0 | λmax=4.014 5 |
A-B | B1-Ci | B2-Ci | B3-Ci | B4-Ci | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bi | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | |||||
CI= 0.032 3 | CI= 0 | CI= 0.026 8 | CI= 0 | CI= 0.004 8 | |||||
RI= 0.890 0 | RI= 0 | RI= 0.520 0 | RI= 0 | RI= 0.890 0 | |||||
CR= 0.036 3 | n ≤ 2 | CR= 0.051 5 | n≤ 2 | CR= 0.005 4 |
Table 3 Random consistency ratio (CR) of the layers
A-B | B1-Ci | B2-Ci | B3-Ci | B4-Ci | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bi | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | |||||
CI= 0.032 3 | CI= 0 | CI= 0.026 8 | CI= 0 | CI= 0.004 8 | |||||
RI= 0.890 0 | RI= 0 | RI= 0.520 0 | RI= 0 | RI= 0.890 0 | |||||
CR= 0.036 3 | n ≤ 2 | CR= 0.051 5 | n≤ 2 | CR= 0.005 4 |
评价因子 Evaluation factor | 权重 Weight B1 0.487 2 | 权重 Weight B2 0.183 3 | 权重 Weight B3 0.116 4 | 权重 Weight B4 0.213 1 | 评价指标总权重 Total weight of suitability index (Ci*) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
海拔 Altitude C1 | 0.666 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.324 8 | |||||
坡度 Slope C2 | 0.333 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.162 4 | |||||
气温 Air temperature C3 | 0 | 0.593 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.108 8 | |||||
太阳辐射 Solar radiation C4 | 0 | 0.249 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.045 7 | |||||
TVDI指数 TVDI index C5 | 0 | 0.157 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.028 8 | |||||
土地利用 Land use C6 | 0 | 0 | 0.833 3 | 0 | 0.097 0 | |||||
土壤类型 Soil type C7 | 0 | 0 | 0.166 7 | 0 | 0.019 4 | |||||
砷污染 Arsenic pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.482 9 | 0.102 9 | |||||
镉污染 Cadmium pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.272 0 | 0.058 0 | |||||
汞污染 Mercury pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.157 0 | 0.033 5 | |||||
铜污染 Cu pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.088 1 | 0.018 8 | |||||
一致性指标 Consistency index (CIi) | 0 | 0.026 8 | 0 | 0.004 8 | CItotal = 0.031 6 | |||||
随机一致性指标Random consistency index (RIj) | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 0.890 0 | RItotal = 1.410 0 |
Table 4 Total weight of tobacco planting suitability index
评价因子 Evaluation factor | 权重 Weight B1 0.487 2 | 权重 Weight B2 0.183 3 | 权重 Weight B3 0.116 4 | 权重 Weight B4 0.213 1 | 评价指标总权重 Total weight of suitability index (Ci*) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
海拔 Altitude C1 | 0.666 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.324 8 | |||||
坡度 Slope C2 | 0.333 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.162 4 | |||||
气温 Air temperature C3 | 0 | 0.593 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.108 8 | |||||
太阳辐射 Solar radiation C4 | 0 | 0.249 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.045 7 | |||||
TVDI指数 TVDI index C5 | 0 | 0.157 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.028 8 | |||||
土地利用 Land use C6 | 0 | 0 | 0.833 3 | 0 | 0.097 0 | |||||
土壤类型 Soil type C7 | 0 | 0 | 0.166 7 | 0 | 0.019 4 | |||||
砷污染 Arsenic pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.482 9 | 0.102 9 | |||||
镉污染 Cadmium pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.272 0 | 0.058 0 | |||||
汞污染 Mercury pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.157 0 | 0.033 5 | |||||
铜污染 Cu pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.088 1 | 0.018 8 | |||||
一致性指标 Consistency index (CIi) | 0 | 0.026 8 | 0 | 0.004 8 | CItotal = 0.031 6 | |||||
随机一致性指标Random consistency index (RIj) | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 0.890 0 | RItotal = 1.410 0 |
评价指标 Evaluation index | 权重 Weight | 指标标度 Index scale | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最适宜 Most appropriate 4 | 适宜 Suitability 3 | 次适宜 Relative suitability 2 | 不适宜 Inappropriate 1 | |||||
C1 海拔 Altitude (m) | 0.324 8 | 1 400-1 800 | 1 200-1 400 1 800-2 000 | 800-1 200 2 000- 2200 | <800 >2 200 | |||
C2 坡度 Slope (°) | 0.162 4 | <15 | 15-20 | 20-25 | >25 | |||
C3 气温 Temperature (℃) | 0.108 8 | >19 | 18-19 | 17-18 | <17 | |||
C4 日均太阳辐射 Daily mean solar radiation ( kJ·m-2) | 0.045 7 | >20 000 | 18 000-20 000 | 15 000-18 000 | <15 000 | |||
C5 干旱指数 Drought index | 0.028 8 | 0.2-0.4 | 0.4-0.6 | 0.6-0.8 | >0.8 | |||
C6 土地利用类型 Land use type | 0.097 0 | 水田 Paddy field | 旱地 Nonirrigated farmland | - | - | |||
C7 土壤类型 Soil type | 0.019 4 | 红壤、紫色土 Red soil, purple soil | 水稻土、黄壤 Paddy soil, yellow soil | 黄棕壤 Yellow-brown soil | 石灰土 Limestone soil | |||
C8 砷污染 Arsenic pollution (mg·kg-1) | 0.102 9 | <15.01 | 15.01-20.00 | 20.00-22.50 | >22.50 | |||
C9 镉污染 Cadmium pollution (mg·kg-1) | 0.058 0 | <0.32 | 0.32-0.50 | 0.50-0.70 | >0.70 | |||
C10 汞污染 Mercury pollution (ng·kg-1) | 0.033 5 | <111 | 111-148 | 148-227 | >227 | |||
C11 铜污染 Cu pollution (μg·g-1) | 0.018 8 | <50 | 50-75 | 75-150 | >150 |
Table 5 Tobacco planting suitability evaluation index
评价指标 Evaluation index | 权重 Weight | 指标标度 Index scale | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最适宜 Most appropriate 4 | 适宜 Suitability 3 | 次适宜 Relative suitability 2 | 不适宜 Inappropriate 1 | |||||
C1 海拔 Altitude (m) | 0.324 8 | 1 400-1 800 | 1 200-1 400 1 800-2 000 | 800-1 200 2 000- 2200 | <800 >2 200 | |||
C2 坡度 Slope (°) | 0.162 4 | <15 | 15-20 | 20-25 | >25 | |||
C3 气温 Temperature (℃) | 0.108 8 | >19 | 18-19 | 17-18 | <17 | |||
C4 日均太阳辐射 Daily mean solar radiation ( kJ·m-2) | 0.045 7 | >20 000 | 18 000-20 000 | 15 000-18 000 | <15 000 | |||
C5 干旱指数 Drought index | 0.028 8 | 0.2-0.4 | 0.4-0.6 | 0.6-0.8 | >0.8 | |||
C6 土地利用类型 Land use type | 0.097 0 | 水田 Paddy field | 旱地 Nonirrigated farmland | - | - | |||
C7 土壤类型 Soil type | 0.019 4 | 红壤、紫色土 Red soil, purple soil | 水稻土、黄壤 Paddy soil, yellow soil | 黄棕壤 Yellow-brown soil | 石灰土 Limestone soil | |||
C8 砷污染 Arsenic pollution (mg·kg-1) | 0.102 9 | <15.01 | 15.01-20.00 | 20.00-22.50 | >22.50 | |||
C9 镉污染 Cadmium pollution (mg·kg-1) | 0.058 0 | <0.32 | 0.32-0.50 | 0.50-0.70 | >0.70 | |||
C10 汞污染 Mercury pollution (ng·kg-1) | 0.033 5 | <111 | 111-148 | 148-227 | >227 | |||
C11 铜污染 Cu pollution (μg·g-1) | 0.018 8 | <50 | 50-75 | 75-150 | >150 |
区域 Region | 最适宜 Most appropriate | 适宜 Suitability | 次适宜 Relative suitability | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | ||
泸西县 Luxi County | 17 032.5 | 34.9 | 22 392.3 | 45.9 | 61 215 | 8.4 | |
弥勒县 Mile County | 26 671.7 | 24.2 | 27 864.5 | 25.3 | 96 525 | 5.8 | |
石屏县 Shiping County | 10 941.2 | 25.5 | 10 515.4 | 24.5 | 92 583 | 14.4 | |
建水县 Jianshui County | 27 042.1 | 34.2 | 19 870.6 | 25.2 | 52 483 | 4.4 | |
个旧县 Gejiu County | 2 936.2 | 15.2 | 9 079.0 | 47.0 | 48 452 | 16.7 | |
蒙自县 Mengzi County | 4 987.7 | 14.9 | 23 120.2 | 68.8 | 13 208 | 2.6 | |
开远县 Kaiyuan County | 15 909.3 | 18.4 | 15 627.8 | 18.0 | 100 554 | 7.7 |
Table 6 Tobacco planting suitability level statistics of the counties in the experimental area
区域 Region | 最适宜 Most appropriate | 适宜 Suitability | 次适宜 Relative suitability | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | ||
泸西县 Luxi County | 17 032.5 | 34.9 | 22 392.3 | 45.9 | 61 215 | 8.4 | |
弥勒县 Mile County | 26 671.7 | 24.2 | 27 864.5 | 25.3 | 96 525 | 5.8 | |
石屏县 Shiping County | 10 941.2 | 25.5 | 10 515.4 | 24.5 | 92 583 | 14.4 | |
建水县 Jianshui County | 27 042.1 | 34.2 | 19 870.6 | 25.2 | 52 483 | 4.4 | |
个旧县 Gejiu County | 2 936.2 | 15.2 | 9 079.0 | 47.0 | 48 452 | 16.7 | |
蒙自县 Mengzi County | 4 987.7 | 14.9 | 23 120.2 | 68.8 | 13 208 | 2.6 | |
开远县 Kaiyuan County | 15 909.3 | 18.4 | 15 627.8 | 18.0 | 100 554 | 7.7 |
区域 Region | 最适宜 Most appropriate | 适宜 Suitability | 次适宜 Relative suitability | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | A (%) | B (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | C (%) | D (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | E (%) | F (%) | ||
泸西县 Luxi County | 2 635.1 | 27.7 | 15.5 | 4 017.1 | 42.3 | 17.9 | 161.3 | 1.7 | 4.0 | |
弥勒县 Mile County | 2 963.3 | 28.4 | 11.1 | 1 947.1 | 18.7 | 7.0 | 258.2 | 2.5 | 4.0 | |
石屏县 Shiping County | 875.7 | 12.6 | 8.0 | 1 511.0 | 21.7 | 14.4 | 504.6 | 7.2 | 8.2 | |
建水县 Jianshui County | 1 918.2 | 27.8 | 7.1 | 631.3 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 173.2 | 2.5 | 5.0 | |
个旧县 Gejiu County | 338.8 | 28.7 | 11.5 | 175.5 | 14.8 | 1.9 | 44.1 | 3.7 | 1.4 | |
蒙自县 Mengzi County | 525.2 | 12.2 | 10.5 | 525.0 | 12.2 | 2.3 | 39.1 | 0.9 | 4.4 | |
开远县 Kaiyuan County | 658.6 | 25.7 | 4.1 | 322.7 | 12.6 | 2.1 | 94.0 | 3.7 | 1.4 |
Table 7 Spatial distribution suitability of tobacco planting in 2010
区域 Region | 最适宜 Most appropriate | 适宜 Suitability | 次适宜 Relative suitability | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | A (%) | B (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | C (%) | D (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | E (%) | F (%) | ||
泸西县 Luxi County | 2 635.1 | 27.7 | 15.5 | 4 017.1 | 42.3 | 17.9 | 161.3 | 1.7 | 4.0 | |
弥勒县 Mile County | 2 963.3 | 28.4 | 11.1 | 1 947.1 | 18.7 | 7.0 | 258.2 | 2.5 | 4.0 | |
石屏县 Shiping County | 875.7 | 12.6 | 8.0 | 1 511.0 | 21.7 | 14.4 | 504.6 | 7.2 | 8.2 | |
建水县 Jianshui County | 1 918.2 | 27.8 | 7.1 | 631.3 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 173.2 | 2.5 | 5.0 | |
个旧县 Gejiu County | 338.8 | 28.7 | 11.5 | 175.5 | 14.8 | 1.9 | 44.1 | 3.7 | 1.4 | |
蒙自县 Mengzi County | 525.2 | 12.2 | 10.5 | 525.0 | 12.2 | 2.3 | 39.1 | 0.9 | 4.4 | |
开远县 Kaiyuan County | 658.6 | 25.7 | 4.1 | 322.7 | 12.6 | 2.1 | 94.0 | 3.7 | 1.4 |
[1] | Dong XQ (董谢琼), Xu H (徐虹), Yang XP (杨晓鹏), Yang Y (杨勇), Zhou GC (周桂春) (2005). GIS-based study of a method of flue-cured tobacco planting suitability regionalization in Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 26(1),16-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Fu P (2000). A Geometric Solar Radiation Model with Applications in Landscape Ecology. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence.75-82. |
[3] | Gillies RR, Carlson TN, Gui J, Kustas WP, Humes KS (1997). A verification of the ‘triangle’ method for obtaining surface soil water content and energy fluxes from remote measurements of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and surface radiant temperature. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18,3145-3166. |
[4] | Guérif M, Duke CL (2000). Adjustment procedure of a crop model to the site specific characteristics of soil and crop using remote sensing data assimilation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 81,57-69. |
[5] | Jiang YM (蒋样明), Cui WH (崔伟宏), Dong QL (董前林), Peng GX (彭光雄) (2010). Study on the 60-year’s temperature variation in China on multiple time scales. Ecology and Environment(生态环境学报), 19,2017-2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Lu KD (陆魁东), Huang WH (黄晚华), Xiao HQ (肖汉乾), Zhang C (张超), Xie BC (谢佰承) (2008). Application of climatic factors’ gridding technology in tobacco-planting regionalization in Hunan Province. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 27,290-294. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Lü XF (吕晓芳), Wang YL (王仰麟), Zhang YL (张镱锂), Shen YC (申元村) (2007). Research on agricultural func- tions regionalization and sustainable development strategy of ecologically vulnerable environment in the west of China—a case of Yanchi County in Ningxia Hui Autono- mous region. Journal of Natural Resources(自然资源学报), 22,177-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Qi SH (齐述华), Wang CY (王长耀), Niu Z (牛铮) (2003). Evaluating soil moisture status in China using the temperature/vegetation dryness index (TVDI). Journal of Remote Sensing (遥感学报), 7,420-427. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] |
Saaty TL, Bennett JP (1997). A theory of analytical hierarchies applied to political candidacy. Behavioral Science, 22,237-245.
DOI URL |
[10] | Sandholt I, Rasmussen K, Andersen J (2002). A simple interpretation of the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of soil moisture status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79,213-224. |
[11] | Shao Y (邵岩) (2006). Research on Tobacco Rotation Planning in Yunnan Province(云南省烤烟轮作规划研究). Science Press, Beijing.2-6. (in Chinese) |
[12] | Wu MQ (吴孟泉), Cui WH (崔伟宏), Li JG (李景刚) (2007). Monitoring drought in mountainous area based on temperature/vegetation dryness index (TVDI). Arid Land Geography (干旱区地理), 30,30-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Xu ZC (许自成), Li YY (黎妍妍), Xiao HQ (肖汉乾), Wang L (王林) (2008). Evaluation of ecological factors and flue- cured tobacco quality in tobacco-growing areas in southern Hunan, China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version)(植物生态学报), 32,226-234. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Yang X (杨曦), Wu JJ (武建军), Yan F (闫峰), Zhang J (张洁) (2009). Assessment of regional soil moisture status based on characteristics of surface temperature/vegetation index space. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29,1205-1216. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Zhai WX (翟文侠), Wang S (王舒), Huang XJ (黄贤金), Du WX (杜文星), Zhong TY (钟太洋) (2007). Applicability evaluation on the natural resources of organic agriculture —a case studies from Lishui County, Jiangsu Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (中国生态农业学报), 15,169-172. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | LIU Hua-Shan, ZUO Tao, HAN Jin-Feng, XU Shu-Xia, ZHANG Zhi-Yong, WANG Xiao-Jun, YUAN Shi-Hao, PU Wen-Xuan, YI Jian-Hua. Effect of degrading bacterium HN36 on ultrastructure of flue-cured tobacco stem and leaves under quinclorac stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(3): 262-268. |
[2] | XU Zi-Cheng, LI Yan-Yan, XIAO Han-Qian, WANG Lin. EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL FACTORS AND FLUE-CURED TOBACCO QUALITY IN TOBACCO-GROWING AREAS IN SOUTHERN HUNAN, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(1): 226-234. |
[3] | CHANG Si-Min, MA Xin-Ming, ZHANG Gui-Long, XIONG Shu-Ping, ZHAN Ke-Hui, LIU Guo-Shun. EFFECTS OF ARSENIC TOXICITY ON CARBON AND NITROGEN METABOLISM AND THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF FLUE-CURED TOBACCO [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(4): 682-688. |
[4] | MA Xin-Ming, LI Chun-Ming, YUAN Zu-Li, XIONG Shu-Ping. EFFECTS OF Pb POLLUTION ON PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS, QUALITY, AND YIELD OF TOBACCO LEAVES [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(3): 472-478. |
[5] | LI Wei-Guo, DAI Ting-Bo, ZHU Yan, CAO Wei-Xing. AN ECOLOGICAL MODEL FOR PREDICTING PROTEIN CONTENT IN RICE GRAINS [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2005, 29(4): 630-635. |
[6] | YANG Tie-Zhao, YIN Quan-Yu, DING Yong-Le, ZHANG Yu-Mei. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OZONE INJURY AND STOMA PARAMETERS AND ACTIVITIES OF ANTIOXIDANT ENZYME [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2004, 28(5): 672-679. |
[7] | YANG Zhen-Jing, XU Jian-Ming. ADVANCES IN STUDIES ON RELATIONSHIP AMONG POLLEN, VEGETATION AND CLIMATE [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2002, 26(增刊): 73-81. |
[8] | LI Rong-Chun. Effects of Cadmium and Lead on Physiological and Ultra-Structural Features in Tobacco Leaves [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2000, 24(2): 238-242. |
[9] | Pan Bo-rong, Yu Qi-li, Yan Cheng. Study for the Ecological Environment and Vulnerable Reasons of the Ammopiptanthus nanus [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1992, 16(3): 276-282. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn