Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 226-234.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.027
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Zi-Cheng1(), LI Yan-Yan1,2, XIAO Han-Qian3, WANG Lin1
Received:
2006-07-05
Accepted:
2006-12-08
Online:
2008-07-05
Published:
2008-01-30
Contact:
XU Zi-Cheng
XU Zi-Cheng, LI Yan-Yan, XIAO Han-Qian, WANG Lin. EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL FACTORS AND FLUE-CURED TOBACCO QUALITY IN TOBACCO-GROWING AREAS IN SOUTHERN HUNAN, CHINA[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(1): 226-234.
指标 Item | 平均 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变幅 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) | 国外优质烟区 High-quality tobacco-growing areas overseas | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
美国 America | 巴西 Brazil | 津巴布韦 Zimbabwe | |||||
年均温 Annual average temperature (℃) | 17.99 | 0.38 | 17.26~18.57 | 2.09 | - | - | - |
大田期均温 Average temperature during field period (℃) | 22.44 | 0.30 | 21.9~22.80 | 1.33 | 22 | 18.8 | 20.7 |
年日照时数 Annual total sunlight hours (h) | 1 516.28 | 68.72 | 1 409.5~1 609.90 | 4.53 | - | - | - |
大田期日照时数 Total sunlight hours during field period (h) | 530.27 | 39.58 | 473.1~578.4 | 7.46 | 1 104 | 696 | 768 |
年降雨量 Annual total precipitation (mm) | 1 464.08 | 73.96 | 1 298.8~1 564.70 | 5.05 | - | - | - |
大田期降雨量 Total precipitation during field period (mm) | 742.57 | 46.25 | 670~820.60 | 6.23 | 593.5 | 657 | 689.4 |
≥10 ℃活动积温 ≥10 ℃ accumulated temperature (℃) | 2 737.10 | 36.16 | 2 673.5~2 787.30 | 1.32 | 3 366 | 2 379 | 2 501 |
大田期空气湿度 Air humidity during field period (%) | 80.23 | 2.02 | 78.2~84.40 | 2.52 | 75 | 78 | 72 |
成熟期昼夜温差 Day-and-night temperature difference during maturing stage (℃) | 8.20 | 0.60 | 7.38~9.33 | 7.36 | - | - | - |
Table 1 Status of several climate factors in southern Hunan (1971-2000)
指标 Item | 平均 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变幅 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) | 国外优质烟区 High-quality tobacco-growing areas overseas | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
美国 America | 巴西 Brazil | 津巴布韦 Zimbabwe | |||||
年均温 Annual average temperature (℃) | 17.99 | 0.38 | 17.26~18.57 | 2.09 | - | - | - |
大田期均温 Average temperature during field period (℃) | 22.44 | 0.30 | 21.9~22.80 | 1.33 | 22 | 18.8 | 20.7 |
年日照时数 Annual total sunlight hours (h) | 1 516.28 | 68.72 | 1 409.5~1 609.90 | 4.53 | - | - | - |
大田期日照时数 Total sunlight hours during field period (h) | 530.27 | 39.58 | 473.1~578.4 | 7.46 | 1 104 | 696 | 768 |
年降雨量 Annual total precipitation (mm) | 1 464.08 | 73.96 | 1 298.8~1 564.70 | 5.05 | - | - | - |
大田期降雨量 Total precipitation during field period (mm) | 742.57 | 46.25 | 670~820.60 | 6.23 | 593.5 | 657 | 689.4 |
≥10 ℃活动积温 ≥10 ℃ accumulated temperature (℃) | 2 737.10 | 36.16 | 2 673.5~2 787.30 | 1.32 | 3 366 | 2 379 | 2 501 |
大田期空气湿度 Air humidity during field period (%) | 80.23 | 2.02 | 78.2~84.40 | 2.52 | 75 | 78 | 72 |
成熟期昼夜温差 Day-and-night temperature difference during maturing stage (℃) | 8.20 | 0.60 | 7.38~9.33 | 7.36 | - | - | - |
指标 Index | 隶属函数类型 Type of membership function | 下限 Lower limit value | 最优值下限 Lower limit of optimal value | 最优值上限 Upper limit of optimal value | 上限 Upper limit value | 权重 Weight value (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
伸根期均温 Average temperature during root extending stage (℃) | 13 | 18 | 28 | 35 | 10.21 | |
旺长期均温 Average temperature during vigorous growth stage (℃) | 10 | 20 | 28 | 35 | 10.16 | |
成熟期均温 Average temperature during maturing stage (℃) | 16 | 20 | 25 | 35 | 10.13 | |
伸根期降雨量 Total precipitation during root extending stage (mm) | 20 | 80 | 100 | 300 | 9.87 | |
旺长期降雨量 Total precipitation during vigorous growth stage (mm) | 抛物线型 Parabola-type function | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | 10.48 |
成熟期降雨量 Total precipitation during maturing stage (mm) | 30 | 80 | 120 | 400 | 10.49 | |
≥10 ℃活动积温 ≥10 ℃ accumulated temperature (℃) | 1 200 | 2 000 | 3 500 | 4 200 | 8.63 | |
大田期日照时数 Total sunlight hours during field period (h) | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800 | 10.18 | |
大田期空气湿度 Air humidity during field period (%) | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 10.55 | |
成熟期昼夜温差 Day-and-night temperature difference during maturing stage (℃) | 5 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 9.30 |
Table 2 Types of membership function, threshold values and weight value of each climate factor
指标 Index | 隶属函数类型 Type of membership function | 下限 Lower limit value | 最优值下限 Lower limit of optimal value | 最优值上限 Upper limit of optimal value | 上限 Upper limit value | 权重 Weight value (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
伸根期均温 Average temperature during root extending stage (℃) | 13 | 18 | 28 | 35 | 10.21 | |
旺长期均温 Average temperature during vigorous growth stage (℃) | 10 | 20 | 28 | 35 | 10.16 | |
成熟期均温 Average temperature during maturing stage (℃) | 16 | 20 | 25 | 35 | 10.13 | |
伸根期降雨量 Total precipitation during root extending stage (mm) | 20 | 80 | 100 | 300 | 9.87 | |
旺长期降雨量 Total precipitation during vigorous growth stage (mm) | 抛物线型 Parabola-type function | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | 10.48 |
成熟期降雨量 Total precipitation during maturing stage (mm) | 30 | 80 | 120 | 400 | 10.49 | |
≥10 ℃活动积温 ≥10 ℃ accumulated temperature (℃) | 1 200 | 2 000 | 3 500 | 4 200 | 8.63 | |
大田期日照时数 Total sunlight hours during field period (h) | 200 | 400 | 600 | 800 | 10.18 | |
大田期空气湿度 Air humidity during field period (%) | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 10.55 | |
成熟期昼夜温差 Day-and-night temperature difference during maturing stage (℃) | 5 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 9.30 |
指标Index | 平均Mean | 标准偏差SD | 变幅Range | 变异系数CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 42.25 | 14.03 | 9.40~92.60 | 33.20 |
pH值 pH value | 7.11 | 0.95 | 4.08~8.70 | 13.41 |
全氮Total N (g·kg-1) | 2.50 | 0.78 | 0.37~4.95 | 31.26 |
全磷Total P (g·kg-1) | 0.87 | 0.31 | 0.25~3.67 | 35.34 |
全钾Total K (g·kg-1) | 11.12 | 3.45 | 2.00~25.90 | 31.03 |
碱解氮Hydrolytic N (mg·kg-1) | 225.52 | 65.52 | 61.20~554.40 | 29.06 |
有效磷Available P (mg·kg-1) | 24.19 | 12.24 | 1.67~84.90 | 50.61 |
速效钾Available K (mg·kg-1) | 97.01 | 39.96 | 11.00~292.00 | 41.19 |
有效锌Available An (mg·kg-1) | 2.52 | 3.87 | 0.21~79.34 | 153.47 |
有效铜Available Cu (mg·kg-1) | 3.68 | 3.45 | 0.33~89.41 | 93.78 |
有效锰Available Mn (mg·kg-1) | 20.98 | 24.26 | 1.80~288.50 | 115.64 |
有效铁Available Fe (mg·kg-1) | 75.12 | 51.82 | 2.90~317.20 | 68.98 |
有效硼Available B (mg·kg-1) | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.02~0.88 | 53.28 |
有效钼Available Mo (mg·kg-1) | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.01~5.29 | 123.16 |
有效硫Available S (mg·kg-1) | 43.05 | 22.08 | 4.80~217.60 | 51.29 |
水溶性氯Soluble Cl (mg·kg-1) | 23.97 | 11.66 | tr~72.18 | 48.62 |
1/2交换性钙Exchangeable Ca (cmol·kg-1) | 11.59 | 6.15 | 0.15~32.44 | 53.02 |
1/2交换性镁Exchangeable Mg (cmol·kg-1) | 1.15 | 0.71 | 0.27~4.94 | 61.48 |
阳离子交换量Cation exchange capacity CEC (cmol·kg-1) | 15.50 | 4.27 | 4.89~27.03 | 27.57 |
Table 3 The status of content of soil nutrients in southern Hunan
指标Index | 平均Mean | 标准偏差SD | 变幅Range | 变异系数CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 42.25 | 14.03 | 9.40~92.60 | 33.20 |
pH值 pH value | 7.11 | 0.95 | 4.08~8.70 | 13.41 |
全氮Total N (g·kg-1) | 2.50 | 0.78 | 0.37~4.95 | 31.26 |
全磷Total P (g·kg-1) | 0.87 | 0.31 | 0.25~3.67 | 35.34 |
全钾Total K (g·kg-1) | 11.12 | 3.45 | 2.00~25.90 | 31.03 |
碱解氮Hydrolytic N (mg·kg-1) | 225.52 | 65.52 | 61.20~554.40 | 29.06 |
有效磷Available P (mg·kg-1) | 24.19 | 12.24 | 1.67~84.90 | 50.61 |
速效钾Available K (mg·kg-1) | 97.01 | 39.96 | 11.00~292.00 | 41.19 |
有效锌Available An (mg·kg-1) | 2.52 | 3.87 | 0.21~79.34 | 153.47 |
有效铜Available Cu (mg·kg-1) | 3.68 | 3.45 | 0.33~89.41 | 93.78 |
有效锰Available Mn (mg·kg-1) | 20.98 | 24.26 | 1.80~288.50 | 115.64 |
有效铁Available Fe (mg·kg-1) | 75.12 | 51.82 | 2.90~317.20 | 68.98 |
有效硼Available B (mg·kg-1) | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.02~0.88 | 53.28 |
有效钼Available Mo (mg·kg-1) | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.01~5.29 | 123.16 |
有效硫Available S (mg·kg-1) | 43.05 | 22.08 | 4.80~217.60 | 51.29 |
水溶性氯Soluble Cl (mg·kg-1) | 23.97 | 11.66 | tr~72.18 | 48.62 |
1/2交换性钙Exchangeable Ca (cmol·kg-1) | 11.59 | 6.15 | 0.15~32.44 | 53.02 |
1/2交换性镁Exchangeable Mg (cmol·kg-1) | 1.15 | 0.71 | 0.27~4.94 | 61.48 |
阳离子交换量Cation exchange capacity CEC (cmol·kg-1) | 15.50 | 4.27 | 4.89~27.03 | 27.57 |
指标 Index | 隶属函数类型 Type of membership function | 下限 Lower limit value | 最优值下限 Lower limit of optimal value | 最优值上限 Upper limit of optimal value | 上限 Upper limit value | 权重 Weight value (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 抛物线型 Parabola-type function | 15.0 | 25.0 | 35.0 | 45.0 | 11.39 |
pH值 pH value | 5.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 10.55 | |
全氮Total N (g·kg-1) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 11.00 | |
碱解氮Hydrolytic N (mg·kg-1) | 60.0 | 110.0 | 180.0 | 240.0 | 10.87 | |
速效磷Available P (mg·kg-1) | 5.0 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 11.28 | |
速效钾Available K (mg·kg-1) | 80.0 | 160.0 | 240.0 | 350.0 | 11.42 | |
水溶性氯Soluble Cl (mg·kg-1) | 5.0 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 11.05 | |
全磷Total P (g·kg-1) | S型 S-type | 0.5 | 1.5 | 10.68 | ||
全钾Total K (g·kg-1) | 10.0 | 20.0 | 11.76 |
Table 4 Types of membership function, threshold values and weight value of each soil nutrient index
指标 Index | 隶属函数类型 Type of membership function | 下限 Lower limit value | 最优值下限 Lower limit of optimal value | 最优值上限 Upper limit of optimal value | 上限 Upper limit value | 权重 Weight value (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 抛物线型 Parabola-type function | 15.0 | 25.0 | 35.0 | 45.0 | 11.39 |
pH值 pH value | 5.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 10.55 | |
全氮Total N (g·kg-1) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 11.00 | |
碱解氮Hydrolytic N (mg·kg-1) | 60.0 | 110.0 | 180.0 | 240.0 | 10.87 | |
速效磷Available P (mg·kg-1) | 5.0 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 11.28 | |
速效钾Available K (mg·kg-1) | 80.0 | 160.0 | 240.0 | 350.0 | 11.42 | |
水溶性氯Soluble Cl (mg·kg-1) | 5.0 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 11.05 | |
全磷Total P (g·kg-1) | S型 S-type | 0.5 | 1.5 | 10.68 | ||
全钾Total K (g·kg-1) | 10.0 | 20.0 | 11.76 |
地点 Location | 平均 Mean (%) | 标准偏差 SD (%) | 变幅 Range (%) | 变异系数 CV (%) | 各烟区土壤等级所占比例 Proportion of soil grading in each tobacco-growing county (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFI≥80% | 60%≤SFI <80% | 40%≤SFI <60% | 20%≤SFI <40% | SFI<20% | |||||
湘南Southern Hunan | 43.92 | 15.49 | 13.32~82.82 | 35.27 | 0.41 | 17.55 | 39.02 | 39.18 | 3.84 |
L1 | 36.07 | 16.15 | 13.32~74.84 | 44.78 | 0 | 9.76 | 26.83 | 47.97 | 15.44 |
L2 | 44.23 | 14.28 | 18.85~80.35 | 32.30 | 1.37 | 15.07 | 39.72 | 42.47 | 1.37 |
L3 | 50.09 | 13.81 | 15.36~80.41 | 27.57 | 1.40 | 23.78 | 50.35 | 23.78 | 0.69 |
L4 | 48.86 | 13.49 | 13.36~74.70 | 27.61 | 0 | 21.59 | 55.68 | 18.18 | 4.55 |
L5 | 49.08 | 18.19 | 16.53~77.79 | 37.06 | 0 | 36.47 | 31.76 | 28.24 | 3.53 |
L6 | 43.60 | 18.05 | 14.89~78.79 | 41.39 | 0 | 23.66 | 27.48 | 41.22 | 7.64 |
L7 | 41.52 | 13.52 | 14.93~82.82 | 32.56 | 0.58 | 10.43 | 38.55 | 48.70 | 1.74 |
L8 | 44.40 | 12.32 | 23.79~78.44 | 27.74 | 0 | 13.00 | 51.00 | 36.00 | 0 |
L9 | 51.81 | 13.49 | 16.61~77.64 | 26.04 | 0 | 27.91 | 51.16 | 18.60 | 2.33 |
L10 | 40.47 | 16.56 | 19.61~80.00 | 40.92 | 0 | 17.02 | 27.66 | 53.19 | 2.13 |
Table 5 Soil feasibility index (SFI) and the evaluation of soil feasibility grade for each tobacco-growing county in southern Hunan
地点 Location | 平均 Mean (%) | 标准偏差 SD (%) | 变幅 Range (%) | 变异系数 CV (%) | 各烟区土壤等级所占比例 Proportion of soil grading in each tobacco-growing county (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFI≥80% | 60%≤SFI <80% | 40%≤SFI <60% | 20%≤SFI <40% | SFI<20% | |||||
湘南Southern Hunan | 43.92 | 15.49 | 13.32~82.82 | 35.27 | 0.41 | 17.55 | 39.02 | 39.18 | 3.84 |
L1 | 36.07 | 16.15 | 13.32~74.84 | 44.78 | 0 | 9.76 | 26.83 | 47.97 | 15.44 |
L2 | 44.23 | 14.28 | 18.85~80.35 | 32.30 | 1.37 | 15.07 | 39.72 | 42.47 | 1.37 |
L3 | 50.09 | 13.81 | 15.36~80.41 | 27.57 | 1.40 | 23.78 | 50.35 | 23.78 | 0.69 |
L4 | 48.86 | 13.49 | 13.36~74.70 | 27.61 | 0 | 21.59 | 55.68 | 18.18 | 4.55 |
L5 | 49.08 | 18.19 | 16.53~77.79 | 37.06 | 0 | 36.47 | 31.76 | 28.24 | 3.53 |
L6 | 43.60 | 18.05 | 14.89~78.79 | 41.39 | 0 | 23.66 | 27.48 | 41.22 | 7.64 |
L7 | 41.52 | 13.52 | 14.93~82.82 | 32.56 | 0.58 | 10.43 | 38.55 | 48.70 | 1.74 |
L8 | 44.40 | 12.32 | 23.79~78.44 | 27.74 | 0 | 13.00 | 51.00 | 36.00 | 0 |
L9 | 51.81 | 13.49 | 16.61~77.64 | 26.04 | 0 | 27.91 | 51.16 | 18.60 | 2.33 |
L10 | 40.47 | 16.56 | 19.61~80.00 | 40.92 | 0 | 17.02 | 27.66 | 53.19 | 2.13 |
项目 Index | 平均 Mean | 标准偏差 SD | 变幅 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) | 权重 Weight value (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
颜色Color | 8.87 | 0.28 | 8.55~9.50 | 3.12 | 15.61 |
成熟度Maturity | 8.60 | 0.30 | 7.94~9.07 | 3.53 | 17.10 |
结构Leaf structure | 9.05 | 0.16 | 8.70~9.20 | 1.76 | 16.78 |
身份Body | 8.23 | 0.69 | 6.50~8.70 | 8.35 | 16.67 |
油分Oil | 8.63 | 0.44 | 7.50~9.00 | 5.07 | 16.67 |
色度Color intensity | 8.62 | 0.55 | 7.25~9.30 | 6.43 | 17.17 |
外观质量指数Appearance quality index (%) | 86.65 | 3.29 | 78.85~91.25 | 3.79 | - |
Table 6 The status of tobacco appearance quality and weight value of each index
项目 Index | 平均 Mean | 标准偏差 SD | 变幅 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) | 权重 Weight value (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
颜色Color | 8.87 | 0.28 | 8.55~9.50 | 3.12 | 15.61 |
成熟度Maturity | 8.60 | 0.30 | 7.94~9.07 | 3.53 | 17.10 |
结构Leaf structure | 9.05 | 0.16 | 8.70~9.20 | 1.76 | 16.78 |
身份Body | 8.23 | 0.69 | 6.50~8.70 | 8.35 | 16.67 |
油分Oil | 8.63 | 0.44 | 7.50~9.00 | 5.07 | 16.67 |
色度Color intensity | 8.62 | 0.55 | 7.25~9.30 | 6.43 | 17.17 |
外观质量指数Appearance quality index (%) | 86.65 | 3.29 | 78.85~91.25 | 3.79 | - |
指标 Index | 平均 Mean | 标准偏差 SD | 变幅 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) | 权重 Weight value (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
香气质Quality of aroma | 6.15 | 0.19 | 5.71~6.36 | 3.07 | 11.53 |
香气量Volume of aroma | 6.42 | 0.23 | 5.93~6.69 | 3.65 | 11.64 |
浓度Taste concentration | 5.78 | 0.10 | 5.63~5.94 | 1.71 | 11.06 |
杂气 Undesirable taste | 5.72 | 0.12 | 5.50~5.94 | 2.03 | 11.71 |
劲头Physiological strength | 7.92 | 0.07 | 7.79~8.00 | 0.86 | 9.98 |
刺激性Biting taste | 5.42 | 0.07 | 5.31~5.50 | 1.27 | 9.87 |
余味After taste | 5.42 | 0.05 | 5.29~5.50 | 0.99 | 11.41 |
燃烧性Combustibility | 8.00 | 0.03 | 7.94~8.06 | 0.37 | 11.46 |
灰色Ash | 6.01 | 0.05 | 5.94~6.13 | 0.78 | 11.34 |
感官质量指数Sensory quality index (%) | 63.08 | 0.74 | 61.38~63.97 | 1.18 | - |
Table 7 The status of tobacco sensory quality and weigh value of each index
指标 Index | 平均 Mean | 标准偏差 SD | 变幅 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) | 权重 Weight value (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
香气质Quality of aroma | 6.15 | 0.19 | 5.71~6.36 | 3.07 | 11.53 |
香气量Volume of aroma | 6.42 | 0.23 | 5.93~6.69 | 3.65 | 11.64 |
浓度Taste concentration | 5.78 | 0.10 | 5.63~5.94 | 1.71 | 11.06 |
杂气 Undesirable taste | 5.72 | 0.12 | 5.50~5.94 | 2.03 | 11.71 |
劲头Physiological strength | 7.92 | 0.07 | 7.79~8.00 | 0.86 | 9.98 |
刺激性Biting taste | 5.42 | 0.07 | 5.31~5.50 | 1.27 | 9.87 |
余味After taste | 5.42 | 0.05 | 5.29~5.50 | 0.99 | 11.41 |
燃烧性Combustibility | 8.00 | 0.03 | 7.94~8.06 | 0.37 | 11.46 |
灰色Ash | 6.01 | 0.05 | 5.94~6.13 | 0.78 | 11.34 |
感官质量指数Sensory quality index (%) | 63.08 | 0.74 | 61.38~63.97 | 1.18 | - |
[1] | Chen ZP (陈泽鹏), Zhan ZS (詹振寿), Guo ZX (郭治兴), Huang ZX (黄兆祥) (2006). Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility for growing tobacco in Guangdong. Chinese Tobacco Science (中国烟草科学), 27(1), 35-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Hu GS (胡国松), Fu JZ (傅建政), Zhang BX (张丙孝), Liu YZ (刘永中), Mu L (穆琳) (1999). Some key factors controlling the quality of flue-cured tobacco in current production conditions of China. Chinese Tobacco Science (中国烟草科学), 20(4), 12-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Hu GS (胡国松), Yang LB (杨林波), Wei W (魏巍), Zhang XJ (章新军), Xiong B (熊斌), Zhang GH (张光辉), Chen BH (陈丙辉), Huang LX (黄立新) (2000). Effect of altitude, variety and some cultivation techniques on the chemical and smoking qualities of flue-cured tobacco. Chinese Tobacco Science (中国烟草科学), 21(3), 9-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Li CY (李春英), Zhang RJ (张仁椒), Liu H (刘泓), Xie TX (谢廷鑫), Zhang X (张翔), Luo G (罗光), Xing SH (邢世和) (2002). The status of soil fertility in Fujian tobacco-growing areas. Journal of Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition) (福建农林大学学报(自然科学版)), 31, 262-265. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Li GC (李广才), Li FX (李富欣), Wang LH (王留河) (1999). The effects of humic acid and cake on soil nutrition and growth of flue-cured tobacco. Tobacco Science & Technology (烟草科技), (3), 39-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Li JP (李进平), Gao YZ (高友珍) (2005). Study on climate division of flue-cured tobacco planting in Hubei Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 26, 250-255. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Liu Q (刘勤), Zhang X (张新), Lai HB (赖辉比), Cao ZH (曹志洪) (2000). On the sulphur nutrition of soil and flue-cured tobacco. Ⅰ. Sulphur nutrition of soil and its effects on growth and development of flue-cured tobacco. Chinese Tobacco Science (中国烟草科学), 21(4), 20-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Li YK (李酉开) (1983). Normal Analysis Methods of Soil and Agrochemistry (土壤农业化学常规分析方法). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[9] | Li YY (黎妍妍), Huang YJ (黄元炯), Xu ZC (许自成), Wu J (吴军), Li FX (李富欣) (2006). Comprehensive evaluation of the tobacco quality usability in Henan. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science (安徽农业科学), 34, 1903-1904. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Long HY (龙怀玉), Liu JL (刘建利), Xu AG (徐爱国), Li ZH (李志宏), Zhang WL (张维理), Zhang YG (张云贵) (2003). A comparison on climate conditions between China's tobacco planting regions and overseas high quality tobacco planting regions. Acta Tabacaria Sinica (中国烟草学报), (Suppl.), 41-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Luo DQ (骆东奇), Bai J (白洁), Xie DT (谢德体) (2002). Research on evaluation norm and method of soil fertility. Soil and Environmental Sciences (土壤与环境), 11, 202-205. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Luo JX (罗建新), Shi LH (石丽红), Long SP (龙世平) (2005). Appraising on the nutrient state of tobacco-growing soil in main areas of Hunan. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences Edition) (湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版)), 31, 376-380. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Na JF (那家凤) (1999). The climatic evaluation of tobacco growth by using grey cluster analysis method. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 20, 37-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Shao L (邵丽), Jin Y (晋艳), Yang HY (杨宇虹), Wang SK (王绍坤), Long YH (龙玉华) (2002). Influences of ecological conditions on the yield and quality of different flue-cured cultivars. Tobacco Science & Technology (烟草科技), (10), 40-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Tang YJ (唐远驹) (2004). Formation and development of tobacco with characteristics. Chinese Tobacco Science (中国烟草科学), 25(1), 10-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Tang YJ (唐远驹) (2005). Quality aim-key problem in development of tobacco planting base. Chinese Tobacco Science (中国烟草科学), 26(2), 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Wang M (王明), Yang SY (杨述元) (1998). Study on climatic zoning indexes of tobacco in Kunming area. Chinese Tobacco Science (中国烟草科学), 19(3), 38-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Wen YQ (温永琴), Xu LF (徐丽芬), Chen ZY (陈宗瑜), Lu F (陆富), Lin LB (林良斌), Cheng HD (程辉斗), Cheng YH (程迎辉) (2002). Relationship between climatic factors and contents of petroleum ether extracts and polyphenol compounds in Yunnan tobacco. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences Edition) (湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版)), 28, 103-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Xie YY (谢远玉), Guo MS (郭萌生), Xiao LC (肖林长), Zhang ZQ (张祖清) (2005). Influence of climate eco-environment conditions on flue-cured tobacco yield and quality in south region of Jiangxi Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 26, 236-238. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Xu ZC (许自成), Liu GS (刘国顺), Liu JH (刘金海), Jin WH (金文华), Shi SC (石栓成), Niu DJ (牛德江), Zhu ZY (祝照宇) (2005). Analysis of ecological factors and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves in Tongshan tobacco-growing areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 1748-1753. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Xu ZC (许自成), Wang L (王林), Wang JP (王金平), Xiao HQ (肖汉乾) (2006). Relationship between chemical components in flue-cured tobacco leaf and soil organic matter contents in Hunan. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 25, 1186-1190. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Yan LM (晏路明) (2002). A matter-element model to the comprehensive evaluation on agroclimatic resources. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture (农业系统科学与综合研究), 18, 260-263. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Yuan YB (袁有波), Shi JX (石俊雄), Fu PH (符平辉), Chen X (陈雪) (2005). Evaluation on main nutrient status of the soil planting flue-cured tobacco at Qianxi County in Guizhou. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences (贵州农业科学), 33(4), 30-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Zhang JZ (张家智) (2000). Study on the climatic conditions for production of high quality and moderate yield of tobacco in Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 21(2), 17-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Zhao X (赵兴), Liu WQ (刘卫群), Zhang WL (张维理), Wang SS (王树声) (2003). Present situation and prospect of balanced fertilization application techniques for flue-cured tobacco production in China. Acta Tabacaria Sinica (中国烟草学报), (Suppl.), 30-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | Zu CL (祖朝龙), Xiong ZM (熊振敏) (1998). Division of climate regions for Anhui's flue-cured tobacco with polymerizing method of vague maths. Journal of Anhui Agrotechnical Teachers College (安徽农业技术师范学院学报), 12(2), 7-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 2860
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 5396
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn