Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1050-1060.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01050
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Cheng-Gang, XUE Jian-Hui*()
Received:
2011-02-21
Accepted:
2011-04-16
Online:
2011-02-21
Published:
2011-11-07
Contact:
XUE Jian-Hui
LIU Cheng-Gang, XUE Jian-Hui. Basic soil properties and comprehensive evaluation in different plantations in rocky desertification sites of the karst region of Guizhou Province, China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(10): 1050-1060.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01050
项目 Item | RP | CD | RD | CK |
---|---|---|---|---|
经度 Longitude | 105°50′ E | 105°48′ E | 105°51′ E | 105°51′ E |
纬度 Latitude | 26°16′ N | 26°15′ N | 26°17′ N | 26°16′ N |
海拔 Altitude (m) | 1 470 | 1 410 | 1 480 | 1 470 |
坡向 Slope aspect | SE | SE | SE | SE |
坡度 Slope (°) | 10 | 18 | 12 | 13 |
平均树高 Average tree height (m) | 3.5 | 2.1 | 6.2x/4.8y | - |
平均地径 Average ground diameter (cm) | 4.8 | 2.7 | 8.0 x/6.4y | - |
林分密度 Stand density (stems·hm-2) | 1 822 | 2 088 | 2 000 | - |
林下植被 Floor vegetation | PP, CH, DA, AH, VP, AC, PA | PP, CH, DA, AH, VP | CA, CH, DA, UM, AH, VP, AT, CJ, PA | PP, DA, UM, AH, VP, LS |
Table 1 Basic situation of sampling plots
项目 Item | RP | CD | RD | CK |
---|---|---|---|---|
经度 Longitude | 105°50′ E | 105°48′ E | 105°51′ E | 105°51′ E |
纬度 Latitude | 26°16′ N | 26°15′ N | 26°17′ N | 26°16′ N |
海拔 Altitude (m) | 1 470 | 1 410 | 1 480 | 1 470 |
坡向 Slope aspect | SE | SE | SE | SE |
坡度 Slope (°) | 10 | 18 | 12 | 13 |
平均树高 Average tree height (m) | 3.5 | 2.1 | 6.2x/4.8y | - |
平均地径 Average ground diameter (cm) | 4.8 | 2.7 | 8.0 x/6.4y | - |
林分密度 Stand density (stems·hm-2) | 1 822 | 2 088 | 2 000 | - |
林下植被 Floor vegetation | PP, CH, DA, AH, VP, AC, PA | PP, CH, DA, AH, VP | CA, CH, DA, UM, AH, VP, AT, CJ, PA | PP, DA, UM, AH, VP, LS |
时间 Time | 样地 Plot | 容重 Bulk density (g·cm-3) | 总孔隙度 Total porosity (%) | 毛管孔隙度Capillary porosity (CP) (%) | 非毛管孔隙度Non-capillary porosity (NCP) (%) | NCP/CP | 田间持水量 Field moisture capacity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009年9月 Sept. 2009 | RP | 0.74 | 64.84 | 35.27 | 29.57 | 0.84 | 47.66 |
CD | 1.00 | 57.79 | 26.53 | 31.25 | 1.18 | 26.50 | |
RD | 1.13 | 53.08 | 31.38 | 21.70 | 0.69 | 27.86 | |
CK | 1.15 | 45.65 | 30.90 | 14.75 | 0.48 | 26.90 | |
2010年9月 Sept. 2010 | RP | 0.69 | 65.50 | 35.88 | 29.62 | 0.83 | 51.50 |
CD | 0.95 | 59.97 | 27.53 | 32.44 | 1.18 | 29.10 | |
RD | 0.89 | 63.11 | 27.45 | 35.66 | 1.30 | 30.82 | |
CK | 1.09 | 48.43 | 33.79 | 14.64 | 0.43 | 31.11 |
Table 2 Soil physical properties of different types of plantations
时间 Time | 样地 Plot | 容重 Bulk density (g·cm-3) | 总孔隙度 Total porosity (%) | 毛管孔隙度Capillary porosity (CP) (%) | 非毛管孔隙度Non-capillary porosity (NCP) (%) | NCP/CP | 田间持水量 Field moisture capacity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009年9月 Sept. 2009 | RP | 0.74 | 64.84 | 35.27 | 29.57 | 0.84 | 47.66 |
CD | 1.00 | 57.79 | 26.53 | 31.25 | 1.18 | 26.50 | |
RD | 1.13 | 53.08 | 31.38 | 21.70 | 0.69 | 27.86 | |
CK | 1.15 | 45.65 | 30.90 | 14.75 | 0.48 | 26.90 | |
2010年9月 Sept. 2010 | RP | 0.69 | 65.50 | 35.88 | 29.62 | 0.83 | 51.50 |
CD | 0.95 | 59.97 | 27.53 | 32.44 | 1.18 | 29.10 | |
RD | 0.89 | 63.11 | 27.45 | 35.66 | 1.30 | 30.82 | |
CK | 1.09 | 48.43 | 33.79 | 14.64 | 0.43 | 31.11 |
Fig. 1 Changes of soil total nutrient contents and pH value in different types of plantations (mean ± SE, n = 3). CD, Cupressus duclouxiana plantation; CK, non-plantation area; RD, Robinia pseudoacacia-C. duclouxiana mixed plantation; RP, R. pseudoacacia plantation. TK, total potassium; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus.
项目 Item | 样地Plot | 2009年9月 Sept. 2009 | 2009年11月 Nov. 2009 | 2010年1月 Jan. 2010 | 2010年3月 Mar. 2010 | 2010年5月 May 2010 | 2010年7月 July 2010 | 2010年9月 Sept. 2010 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 Organic mater (g·kg-1) | RP | 90.5b | 90.0b | 84.9b | 89.4b | 88.0b | 84.2b | 89.1b |
CD | 82.7c | 89.0b | 78.2c | 73.2d | 93.6a | 93.5a | 88.4b | |
RD | 101.2a | 97.8a | 91.2a | 98.1a | 91.5a | 93.3a | 97.4a | |
CK | 72.2d | 71.2c | 82.7b | 82.5c | 84.2c | 82.9b | 80.3c | |
碱解氮 Available nitrogen (mg·kg-1) | RP | 566a | 306b | 205b | 218c | 174c | 281b | 359a |
CD | 247c | 293b | 150c | 193d | 321a | 218c | 209b | |
RD | 449b | 349a | 85d | 321a | 139d | 427a | 206b | |
CK | 228c | 195c | 242a | 244b | 289b | 269b | 207b | |
有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | RP | 9a | 3a | 6b | 8a | 6c | 6c | 9ab |
CD | 5b | 2b | 2c | 1c | 7b | 10b | 10a | |
RD | 10a | 2b | 7a | 4b | 7b | 10b | 7c | |
CK | 2c | 1c | 6b | 4b | 8a | 13a | 8b | |
速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) | RP | 218b | 87d | 96c | 77c | 88c | 110b | 177a |
CD | 132d | 110c | 96c | 64d | 80d | 119a | 138c | |
RD | 198c | 151a | 112b | 96b | 105a | 120a | 164b | |
CK | 260a | 132b | 125a | 112a | 93b | 120a | 140c |
Table 3 Dynamics of soil nutrient of different types of plantations
项目 Item | 样地Plot | 2009年9月 Sept. 2009 | 2009年11月 Nov. 2009 | 2010年1月 Jan. 2010 | 2010年3月 Mar. 2010 | 2010年5月 May 2010 | 2010年7月 July 2010 | 2010年9月 Sept. 2010 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 Organic mater (g·kg-1) | RP | 90.5b | 90.0b | 84.9b | 89.4b | 88.0b | 84.2b | 89.1b |
CD | 82.7c | 89.0b | 78.2c | 73.2d | 93.6a | 93.5a | 88.4b | |
RD | 101.2a | 97.8a | 91.2a | 98.1a | 91.5a | 93.3a | 97.4a | |
CK | 72.2d | 71.2c | 82.7b | 82.5c | 84.2c | 82.9b | 80.3c | |
碱解氮 Available nitrogen (mg·kg-1) | RP | 566a | 306b | 205b | 218c | 174c | 281b | 359a |
CD | 247c | 293b | 150c | 193d | 321a | 218c | 209b | |
RD | 449b | 349a | 85d | 321a | 139d | 427a | 206b | |
CK | 228c | 195c | 242a | 244b | 289b | 269b | 207b | |
有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | RP | 9a | 3a | 6b | 8a | 6c | 6c | 9ab |
CD | 5b | 2b | 2c | 1c | 7b | 10b | 10a | |
RD | 10a | 2b | 7a | 4b | 7b | 10b | 7c | |
CK | 2c | 1c | 6b | 4b | 8a | 13a | 8b | |
速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) | RP | 218b | 87d | 96c | 77c | 88c | 110b | 177a |
CD | 132d | 110c | 96c | 64d | 80d | 119a | 138c | |
RD | 198c | 151a | 112b | 96b | 105a | 120a | 164b | |
CK | 260a | 132b | 125a | 112a | 93b | 120a | 140c |
Fig. 2 Variations of soil enzyme activities in different types of plantations (mean ± SE, n = 3). A, Urease activity. B, Invertase activity. C, Catalase activity. D, Polyphenoloxidase activity. E, Alkaline phosphatase activity. CD, Cupressus duclouxiana plantation; CK, non-plantation area; RD, Robinia pseudoacacia-C. duclouxiana mixed plantation; RP, R. pseudoacacia plantation.
主成分 Principal component | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | …… | 19 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
贡献率 Percentage of variance (%) | 45.48 | 31.73 | 22.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 | …… | 0.00 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative percentage (%) | 45.48 | 77.21 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | …… | 100.00 |
Table 4 Principal component analysis on soil quality indexes
主成分 Principal component | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | …… | 19 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
贡献率 Percentage of variance (%) | 45.48 | 31.73 | 22.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 | …… | 0.00 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative percentage (%) | 45.48 | 77.21 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | …… | 100.00 |
土壤指标 Soil index | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
因子负荷量 Factor capacity | A1 | 0.152 | 0.064 | 0.302 | 0.082 | 0.185 | 0.235 | 0.340 | 0.067 | 0.303 | |
A2 | 0.270 | 0.373 | 0.064 | 0.391 | 0.341 | 0.145 | 0.008 | 0.330 | 0.092 | ||
权重 Weight | B1 | 0.038 | 0.016 | 0.075 | 0.020 | 0.046 | 0.058 | 0.084 | 0.017 | 0.075 | |
B2 | 0.074 | 0.102 | 0.017 | 0.107 | 0.093 | 0.040 | 0.002 | 0.090 | 0.025 | ||
土壤指标 Soil index | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 | x18 | x19 | |
因子负荷量 Factor capacity | A1 | 0.206 | 0.095 | 0.276 | 0.312 | 0.215 | 0.207 | 0.189 | 0.331 | 0.229 | 0.249 |
A2 | 0.019 | 0.372 | 0.238 | 0.114 | 0.217 | 0.250 | 0.147 | 0.092 | 0.041 | 0.162 | |
权重 Weight | B1 | 0.051 | 0.024 | 0.068 | 0.077 | 0.053 | 0.051 | 0.047 | 0.082 | 0.057 | 0.062 |
B2 | 0.005 | 0.101 | 0.065 | 0.031 | 0.059 | 0.068 | 0.040 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.044 |
Table 5 Values of component capacity and weights of soil quality indexes
土壤指标 Soil index | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
因子负荷量 Factor capacity | A1 | 0.152 | 0.064 | 0.302 | 0.082 | 0.185 | 0.235 | 0.340 | 0.067 | 0.303 | |
A2 | 0.270 | 0.373 | 0.064 | 0.391 | 0.341 | 0.145 | 0.008 | 0.330 | 0.092 | ||
权重 Weight | B1 | 0.038 | 0.016 | 0.075 | 0.020 | 0.046 | 0.058 | 0.084 | 0.017 | 0.075 | |
B2 | 0.074 | 0.102 | 0.017 | 0.107 | 0.093 | 0.040 | 0.002 | 0.090 | 0.025 | ||
土壤指标 Soil index | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 | x18 | x19 | |
因子负荷量 Factor capacity | A1 | 0.206 | 0.095 | 0.276 | 0.312 | 0.215 | 0.207 | 0.189 | 0.331 | 0.229 | 0.249 |
A2 | 0.019 | 0.372 | 0.238 | 0.114 | 0.217 | 0.250 | 0.147 | 0.092 | 0.041 | 0.162 | |
权重 Weight | B1 | 0.051 | 0.024 | 0.068 | 0.077 | 0.053 | 0.051 | 0.047 | 0.082 | 0.057 | 0.062 |
B2 | 0.005 | 0.101 | 0.065 | 0.031 | 0.059 | 0.068 | 0.040 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.044 |
土壤指标 Soil index | RP | CD | RD | CK | 差值 D-value | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | ||||||
x1 | 0.72 | 1.000 | 0.98 | 0.356 | 1.01 | 0.281 | 1.12 | 0.000 | 0.40 | ||||
x2 | 65.17 | 1.000 | 58.88 | 0.653 | 58.10 | 0.610 | 47.04 | 0.000 | 18.13 | ||||
x3 | 35.58 | 1.000 | 27.03 | 0.000 | 29.42 | 0.279 | 32.35 | 0.622 | 8.54 | ||||
x4 | 29.60 | 0.869 | 31.85 | 1.000 | 28.68 | 0.815 | 14.70 | 0.000 | 17.15 | ||||
x5 | 0.83 | 0.521 | 1.18 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 0.747 | 0.46 | 0.000 | 0.72 | ||||
x6 | 0.50 | 1.000 | 0.28 | 0.000 | 0.29 | 0.076 | 0.29 | 0.076 | 0.22 | ||||
x7 | 7.59 | 0.000 | 8.41 | 1.000 | 7.83 | 0.293 | 7.86 | 0.329 | 0.82 | ||||
x8 | 87.90 | 0.516 | 85.50 | 0.371 | 95.80 | 1.000 | 79.40 | 0.000 | 16.40 | ||||
x9 | 2.84 | 0.000 | 4.48 | 1.000 | 3.98 | 0.696 | 3.34 | 0.306 | 1.64 | ||||
x10 | 7.05 | 0.582 | 7.97 | 1.000 | 5.77 | 0.000 | 6.84 | 0.486 | 2.20 | ||||
x11 | 1.46 | 0.863 | 1.59 | 1.000 | 1.27 | 0.663 | 0.64 | 0.000 | 0.95 | ||||
x12 | 301.00 | 1.000 | 233.00 | 0.000 | 282.00 | 0.720 | 239.00 | 0.092 | 68.00 | ||||
x13 | 7.00 | 1.000 | 5.00 | 0.000 | 7.00 | 1.000 | 6.00 | 0.500 | 2.00 | ||||
x14 | 122.00 | 0.486 | 105.00 | 0.000 | 135.00 | 0.868 | 140.00 | 1.000 | 35.00 | ||||
x15 | 1.00 | 0.872 | 0.71 | 0.015 | 0.70 | 0.000 | 1.04 | 1.000 | 0.34 | ||||
x16 | 39.81 | 1.000 | 30.95 | 0.240 | 28.15 | 0.000 | 37.07 | 0.765 | 11.66 | ||||
x17 | 0.53 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 0.000 | 0.66 | 0.723 | 0.78 | 0.461 | 0.47 | ||||
x18 | 0.18 | 0.500 | 0.17 | 0.000 | 0.19 | 1.000 | 0.18 | 0.500 | 0.02 | ||||
x19 | 192.33 | 0.664 | 159.24 | 0.000 | 209.06 | 1.000 | 174.04 | 0.297 | 49.82 |
Table 6 Means and values of membership degree of soil quality indexes
土壤指标 Soil index | RP | CD | RD | CK | 差值 D-value | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | ||||||
x1 | 0.72 | 1.000 | 0.98 | 0.356 | 1.01 | 0.281 | 1.12 | 0.000 | 0.40 | ||||
x2 | 65.17 | 1.000 | 58.88 | 0.653 | 58.10 | 0.610 | 47.04 | 0.000 | 18.13 | ||||
x3 | 35.58 | 1.000 | 27.03 | 0.000 | 29.42 | 0.279 | 32.35 | 0.622 | 8.54 | ||||
x4 | 29.60 | 0.869 | 31.85 | 1.000 | 28.68 | 0.815 | 14.70 | 0.000 | 17.15 | ||||
x5 | 0.83 | 0.521 | 1.18 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 0.747 | 0.46 | 0.000 | 0.72 | ||||
x6 | 0.50 | 1.000 | 0.28 | 0.000 | 0.29 | 0.076 | 0.29 | 0.076 | 0.22 | ||||
x7 | 7.59 | 0.000 | 8.41 | 1.000 | 7.83 | 0.293 | 7.86 | 0.329 | 0.82 | ||||
x8 | 87.90 | 0.516 | 85.50 | 0.371 | 95.80 | 1.000 | 79.40 | 0.000 | 16.40 | ||||
x9 | 2.84 | 0.000 | 4.48 | 1.000 | 3.98 | 0.696 | 3.34 | 0.306 | 1.64 | ||||
x10 | 7.05 | 0.582 | 7.97 | 1.000 | 5.77 | 0.000 | 6.84 | 0.486 | 2.20 | ||||
x11 | 1.46 | 0.863 | 1.59 | 1.000 | 1.27 | 0.663 | 0.64 | 0.000 | 0.95 | ||||
x12 | 301.00 | 1.000 | 233.00 | 0.000 | 282.00 | 0.720 | 239.00 | 0.092 | 68.00 | ||||
x13 | 7.00 | 1.000 | 5.00 | 0.000 | 7.00 | 1.000 | 6.00 | 0.500 | 2.00 | ||||
x14 | 122.00 | 0.486 | 105.00 | 0.000 | 135.00 | 0.868 | 140.00 | 1.000 | 35.00 | ||||
x15 | 1.00 | 0.872 | 0.71 | 0.015 | 0.70 | 0.000 | 1.04 | 1.000 | 0.34 | ||||
x16 | 39.81 | 1.000 | 30.95 | 0.240 | 28.15 | 0.000 | 37.07 | 0.765 | 11.66 | ||||
x17 | 0.53 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 0.000 | 0.66 | 0.723 | 0.78 | 0.461 | 0.47 | ||||
x18 | 0.18 | 0.500 | 0.17 | 0.000 | 0.19 | 1.000 | 0.18 | 0.500 | 0.02 | ||||
x19 | 192.33 | 0.664 | 159.24 | 0.000 | 209.06 | 1.000 | 174.04 | 0.297 | 49.82 |
Fig. 3 Soil integrated quality index (SQI) of different types of plantations. CD, Cupressus duclouxiana plantation; CK, non-plantation area; RD, Robinia pseudoacacia-C. duclouxiana mixed plantation; RP, R. pseudoacacia plantation.
[1] | Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2004). Extracellular enzyme activities and carbon chemistry as drivers of tropical plant litter decomposition. Biotropica, 36, 285-296. |
[2] | Bo HF (勃海锋), Liu GB (刘国彬), Wang GL (王国梁) (2007). Changes of infiltration characteristics of abandoned cropland with plant restoration in Loess hilly region. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持通报), 27(3), 1-5, 31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] |
Burger JA, Kelting DL (1999). Using soil quality indicators to assess forest stand management. Forest Ecology and Management, 122, 155-166.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Cao CY, Jiang DM, Teng XH, Jiang Y, Liang WJ, Cui ZB (2008). Soil chemical and microbiological properties along a chronosequence of Caragana microphylla Lam. plantations in the Horqin Sandy Land of Northeast China. Applied Soil Ecology, 40, 78-85.
DOI URL |
[5] | Chen ZY (陈祖拥), Liu F (刘方), Pu TD (蒲通达), Li Z (李准), Ning J (宁婧) (2009). Change of soil enzyme activity during the process of Karst forest degradation in central region of Guizhou. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences (贵州农业科学), 37(2), 47-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] |
Criquet S, Farnet AM, Tagger S (2000). Annual variations of phenoloxidase activities in an evergreen oak litter influence of certain biotic and abiotic factors. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1505-1513.
DOI URL |
[7] | Dai LM (代力民), Xu ZB (徐振邦), Zhang YJ (张扬建), Chen H (陈华) (2001). Study on decomposition rate and fall of Pinus koraiensis needle. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 21, 1296-1300. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Dong LL (董莉丽), Zheng FL (郑粉莉) (2008). Characteristics of soil enzyme activities and nutrients under various landuse in the loessial hilly-gully region. Ecology and Environment (生态环境), 17, 2050-2058. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Fan AN (范阿南), Yang K (杨凯), Liu CH (刘春华), Dong Q (董茜) (2009). Seasonal variations of soil enzyme activi- ties in secondary forest communities in montane region of eastern Liaoning Province. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 37, 52-54, 71. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] |
Fu BJ, Liu SL, Chen LD, Lü YH, Qiu J (2004). Soil quality regime in relation to land cover and slope position across a highly modified slope landscape. Ecology Restoration, 19, 111-118.
DOI URL |
[11] | Gao XF (高雪峰), Han GD (韩国栋), Zhang G (张功), Zhao ML (赵萌莉), Lu P (卢萍) (2007). Study on dynamics of soil enzyme activity and nutrient of desert steppe under different grazing intensities. Pratacultural Science (草业科学), 24(2), 10-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Gong J (巩杰), Chen LD (陈利顶), Fu BJ (傅伯杰), LI YM (李延梅), Huang ZL (黄志霖), Huang YL (黄奕龙), Peng HJ (彭鸿嘉) (2004). Effects of land use and vegetation restoration on soil quality in a small catchment of the Loss Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15, 2292-2296. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Guan SY (关松荫) (1986). NSoil Enzyme and Study Method (土壤酶及其研究方法). China Agricultural Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[14] | He B (何斌), Liu YH (刘运华), Lu ZK (陆志科), Dai J (戴军) (2004). Seasonal changes of soil available nutrients and enzyme activity of Cinamomum cassia plantation. Nonwood Forest Research (经济林研究), 22(3), 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | He YJ (何跃军), Zhong ZC (钟章成), Liu JM (刘济明), Liu JC (刘锦春), Jin J (金静), Li QY (李青雨) (2005). Soil enzyme activities of limestone degraded ecosystem at its different restoration phases. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 16, 1077-1081. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Hou BD (侯本栋), Ma FY (马风云) (2007). Effect of the mixed stands of black locust with other tree species on soil chemical property and soil enzyme activity. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science) (山东农业大学学报(自然科学版)), 38, 53-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Hu YJ (胡延杰), Zhai MP (翟明普), Wu JW (武觐文), Jia LM (贾黎明) (2001). Dynamics of enzyme activity in the soil of pure and mixed stands of poplar and black locust. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 23(5), 23-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Huang Y (黄宇), Wang SL (汪思龙), Feng ZW (冯宗炜), GAO H (高洪), Wang QK (王清奎), Hu YL (胡亚林), Yan SK (颜绍馗) (2004). Soil quality assessment of forest stand in different plantation ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15, 2199-2205. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Jiao Y (焦燕), Zhao JH (赵江红), Xu Z (徐柱) (2009). Effects of a conversion from grassland to cropland on soil physical-chemical properties in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia: analysis of a 50-year chronosequence. Ecology and Environmental Sciences (生态环境学报), 18, 1965-1970. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Lan X (兰雪), Dai QH (戴全厚), Yu LF (喻理飞), Yang Z (杨智) (2009). Soil enzyme activity of different restoration stages in karst degenerative forest. Research of Agricul- ture Modernization (农业现代化研究), 30, 620-624. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Li D (李丹), He TB (何腾兵), Liu CQ (刘丛强), Tu CL (涂成龙), Li GZ (李广枝) (2008). Review and prospect on soil enzyme activity in karst mountain area. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences (贵州农业科学), 36(2), 87-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Li ZG (李振高), Luo YM (骆永明), Teng Y (滕应) (2008). Research Methods of Soil Environmental Microorganism (土壤与环境微生物研究法). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[23] | Long J (龙健), Deng QQ (邓启琼), Jiang XR (江新荣), Liu F (刘方) (2005). Effects of different de-farming and reafforestation patterns on changes of soil fertility quality in karst region of southwestern China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 16, 1279-1284. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Long J (龙健), Li J (李娟), Jiang XR (江新荣), Deng QQ (邓启琼), Li YB (李阳兵) (2006). Effects of different recover and restoration measures on soil quality in karst rocky desertification region. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 17, 615-619. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Lu RK (鲁如坤) (2000). Analysis Methods of Soil Agricultural Chemistry (土壤农业化学分析方法). Chinese Agricul- tural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[26] |
Luo DH (罗东辉), Xia J (夏婧), Yuan JW (袁婧薇), Zhang ZH (张忠华), Zhu JD (祝介东), Ni J (倪健) (2010). Root biomass of karst vegetation in a mountainous area of southwestern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 611-618. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[27] | Luo HB (罗海波), Song GY (宋光煜), He TB (何腾兵), Liu CQ (刘丛强), Liu F (刘方), Liu YS (刘元生), Qian XG (钱晓刚) (2004). Effect of soil properties during controlling karst rocky desertification process in Guizhou Province. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 18(6), 112-115. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Meng TY (孟天友), Wang XM (王兴明), Li Q (李琼) (2005). Study on eco-economics construction of rocky desertifica- tion regions. Soil and Water Conservation in China (中国水土保持), ( 9), 10-12. (in Chinese) |
[29] | Rong L (容丽), Xiong KN (熊康宁) (2007). Drought-resistance characters of karst plant of adaptability in Huajiang karst gorge I: root system of Zanthoxylum planispinum var. dintanensis and its soil environment. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Science) (贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版)), 25(4), 1-7, 34. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[30] | Wang J (王健), Liu ZX (刘作新) (2004). Study on the biological properties of soil under the mixed forests of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. and Robinia pseudoaeaeia L. Arid Zone Research (干旱区研究), 21, 348-352. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | Wu HY (吴海勇), Peng WX (彭晚霞), Song TQ (宋同清), Zeng FP (曾馥平), Li XH (黎星辉), Song XJ (宋希娟), Ouyang ZW (欧阳资文) (2008). Changes of soil nutrients in process of natural vegetation restoration in karst disturbed area in northwest Guangxi. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 22(4), 143-147. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[32] |
Yang WQ (杨万勤), Wang KY (王开运) (2004). Advances in forest soil enzymology. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 40(2), 152-159. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[33] | Yue ZH (岳中辉), Wang BW (王博文), Wang HF (王洪峰), Yan XF (阎秀峰) (2008). Seasonal dynamics of soil enzy- matic activities in west Songnen alkali degraded grass- land. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 22(6), 162-165. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[34] | Zeng FP (曾馥平), Peng WX (彭晚霞), Song TQ (宋同清), Wang KL (王克林), Wu HY (吴海勇), Song XJ (宋希娟), Zeng ZX (曾昭霞) (2007). Changes in vegetation after 22 years’ natural restoration in the karst disturbed area in Northwest Guangxi. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 5110-5119. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[35] | Zhang M (张猛), Zhang J (张健) (2003). Advance in research on microbe and enzyme activity in forest soil. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University (四川农业大学学报), 21, 347-351. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] | Zhang QF (张庆费), Song YC (宋永昌), You WH (由文辉) (1999). Relationship between plant community secondary succession and soil fertility in Tiantong, Zhejiang Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19, 174-178. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[37] | Zhang YL (张银龙), Lin P (林鹏) (1999). The seasonal and spatial dynamics of soil enzyme activities under Kandelia candel mangrove forest. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science) (厦门大学学报(自然科学版)), 38, 129-136. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[38] | Zhao GF (赵谷风), Cai YB (蔡延马奔), Luo YY (罗媛媛), Li MH (李铭红), Yu MJ (于明坚) (2006). Nutrient dynamics in litter decomposition in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in East China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 26, 3286-3295. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[39] | Zhao XM (赵雪梅), Sun XY (孙向阳), Wang HY (王海燕), Tian Y (田赟), Kang XY (康向阳) (2010). Dynamics of soil nutritional factors and pH value of triploid Populus tomentosa plantation. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 30, 3414-3423. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[40] | Zhou W (周玮), Zhou YC (周运超) (2010). Soil enzyme activities under different vegetation types in Beipan River karst gorge district. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 46(1), 136-141. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[41] | Zou J (邹军), Yu LF (喻理飞), Li YY (李媛媛) (2010). Study on soil enzyme activity characteristics during succession of degraded karst vegetation. Ecology and Environmental Sciences (生态环境学报), 19, 894-898. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | WU Fan, WU Chen, ZHANG Yu-Hui, YU Heng, WEI Zhi-Hua, ZHENG Wei, LIU Xiao-Fei, CHEN Shi-Dong, YANG Zhi-Jie, XIONG De-Cheng. Effects of warming on growth, morphology and physiological metabolism characteristics of fine roots in a mature Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in different seasons [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(6): 856-866. |
[2] | LIN Shao-Ying, ZENG Yu, YANG Wen-Wen, CHEN Bin, RUAN Min-Min, YIN Xiao-Lei, YANG Xiang, WANG Wei-Qi. Effects of straw and biochar addition on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry in Jasminum sambac plant and soil [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(4): 530-545. |
[3] | FAN Yun-Xiang, DI Nan, LIU Yang, ZHANG Yu-Wen, DUAN Jie, LI Xin, WANG Hai-Hong, XI Ben-Ye. Spatiotemporal dynamics of nocturnal sap flow of Populus tomentosa and environmental impact factors [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(2): 262-274. |
[4] | DANG Hong-Zhong, ZHANG Xue-Li, HAN Hui, SHI Chang-Chun, GE Yu-Xiang, MA Quan-Lin, CHEN Shuai, LIU Chun-Ying. Research advances on forest-water relationships in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations for sand dune immobilization and guidance to forest management practices [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 971-983. |
[5] | LI Wan-Nian, LUO Yi-Min, HUANG Ze-Yue, YANG Mei. Effects of mixed young plantations of Parashorea chinensis on soil microbial functional diversity and carbon source utilization [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1109-1124. |
[6] | LIU Pei-Rong, TONG Xiao-Juan, MENG Ping, ZHANG Jin-Song, ZHANG Jing-Ru, YU Pei-Yang, ZHOU Yu. Effect of diffuse radiation on gross primary productivity of typical planted forests in eastern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 904-918. |
[7] | HUANG Dong-Liu, XIANG Wei, LI Zhong-Guo, ZHU Shi-Dan. Hydraulic architecture and safety margin in ten afforestation species in a lower subtropical region [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(5): 602-612. |
[8] | WANG Li-Shuang, TONG Xiao-Juan, MENG Ping, ZHANG Jin-Song, LIU Pei-Rong, LI Jun, ZHANG Jing-Ru, ZHOU Yu. Energy flux and evapotranspiration of two typical plantations in semi-arid area of western Liaoning, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(12): 1508-1522. |
[9] | YIN Xiao-Lei, LIU Xu-Yang, JIN Qiang, LI Xian-De, LIN Shao-Ying, YANG Xiang, WANG Wei-Qi, ZHANG Yong-Xun. Effects of different management methods on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents and their stoichiometric ratios in tea plants [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(7): 749-759. |
[10] | WANG Zi-Wei, WAN Song-Ze, JIANG Hong-Mao, HU Yang, MA Shu-Qin, CHEN You-Chao, LU Xu-Yang. Soil enzyme activities and their influencing factors among different alpine grasslands on the Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(5): 528-538. |
[11] | LUO Lin, HUANG Yan, LIANG Jin, WANG En-Tao, HU Jun, HE He-Liang, ZHAO Chun-Zhang. Effects of plant interspecific interaction and warming on soil microbial community in root zone soil of two dominant tree species in the subalpine coniferous forest in southwestern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(8): 875-884. |
[12] | XIE Meng-Yi, FENG Xiu-Xiu, MA Huan-Fei, HU Han, WANG Jie-Ying, GUO Yao-Xin, REN Cheng-Jie, WANG Jun, ZHAO Fa-Zhu. Characteristics of soil enzyme activities and stoichiometry and its influencing factors in Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forests in the Qinling Mountains [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(8): 885-894. |
[13] | HU Ming-Yuan, YUAN Ye, DAI Xiao-Qin, FU Xiao-Li, KOU Liang, WANG Hui-Min. Characteristics of soil nitrogen mineralization in the rhizosphere of trees, shrubs, and herbs in subtropical forest plantations [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(12): 1285-1295. |
[14] | LÜ Zhong-Cheng, KANG Wen-Xing, HUANG Zhi-Hong, ZHAO Zhong-Hui, DENG Xiang-Wen. Reuse of retranslocated nutrients in tissues of Chinese fir in plantations of different ages [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(5): 458-470. |
[15] | GAO Yu-Qiu, DAI Xiao-Qin, WANG Jian-Lei, FU Xiao-Li, KOU Liang, WANG Hui-Min. Characteristics of soil enzymes stoichiometry in rhizosphere of understory vegetation in subtropical forest plantations [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(3): 258-272. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn