• •    

玉龙雪山针阔叶林土壤甲烷吸收对地上凋落物输入改变的响应差异

杨子莹, 门修贤, 黄宝山, 程晓莉   

  1. 云南大学生态与环境学院, 云南 650500
    云南大学植被结构功能与建造全国重点实验室, 650500
    云南师范大学地理学部, 650500
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-29 修回日期:2026-08-15
  • 基金资助:
    云南省基础研究专项重大项目(202601BC070004); 国家重点研发计划(2024YFF1306700); 云南大学大学生创新训练项目(202510673098)

Divergent responses of soil methane uptake to aboveground litter input of coniferous and broad-leaved forests in Yulong Snow Mountain

YANG Zi-Ying, MEN Xiu-Xian, HUANG Bao-Shan, CHENG Xiao-Li   

  1. School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Yunnan University 650500,
    State Key Laboratory of Vegetation Structure, Function and Construction, Yunnan University 650500,
    Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University 650500,
  • Received:2026-06-29 Revised:2026-08-15
  • Supported by:
    the Major Project of Yunnan Provincial Basic Research Program(202601BC070004); the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2024YFF1306700); Innovation Training Project for Undergraduate Students of Yunnan University(202510673098)

摘要: 森林土壤是大气甲烷(CH4)的重要生物汇,其甲烷氧化功能对维持全球碳循环与气候调节具有关键作用。地上凋落物作为连接植被与土壤的关键纽带,其输入量变化可通过改变土壤微环境、养分循环及微生物活性,调控土壤CH4吸收过程。然而,该过程在森林类型中是否具有差异尚不明确,尤其在气候敏感的亚高山森林中,相关研究较少。为探究地上凋落物输入改变对亚高山森林土壤CH4吸收通量的影响,阐明不同林型下CH4汇功能的差异化驱动机制,本研究以玉龙雪山南坡典型针叶林与阔叶林为研究对象,设置双倍凋落物(DL)、对照(CK)和去除凋落物(NL)三个处理。通过连续监测土壤CH4通量动态,并测定土壤理化性质、微生物生物量及胞外酶活性,系统解析了凋落物输入改变对土壤CH4通量的综合影响及关键驱动路径。结果表明:(1)森林类型对土壤CH4吸收速率的影响极显著(P<0.001),针叶林土壤CH4年吸收量显著高于阔叶林;(2)凋落物输入变化对CH4通量的影响存在林型差异:阔叶林中双倍凋落物处理显著降低CH4吸收(P<0.05),而针叶林各处理间无显著差异(P>0.05);(3)土壤CH4吸收受土壤理化性质与微生物胞外酶协同调控,针叶林中土壤pH和全氮的相对重要性较高,阔叶林中土壤湿度与β-葡萄糖苷酶活性相对重要性更高。本研究表明,亚高山森林土壤CH4汇功能主要受林型分异主导,凋落物输入的影响在阔叶林中更为显著,且调控路径存在林型间差异。研究结果为精确评估森林碳汇潜力及优化地球系统模型参数提供了重要理论依据与数据支撑。

关键词: 碳循环, 甲烷通量, 凋落物输入, 森林类型, 亚高山地区, 土壤

Abstract: [Aims] Forest soil is an important biological sink for atmospheric methane (CH4), and its CH4 oxidation function plays a key role in regulating global carbon cycling and climate change. Aboveground litter serves as a critical link between vegetation and soil, and changes in its input can affect the CH4 oxidation process by altering soil microenvironments, nutrient cycling and microbial activity. However, whether this process varies with forest type remains unclear, particularly in subalpine forests that are sensitive to climate change, where relevant research is especially limited. [Methods] This study selected typical coniferous and broad-leaved forests on the southern of Yulong Snow Mountain and established three treatments: double litter (DL), control (CK), and no litter (NL). Through continuous monitoring of soil CH4 flux dynamics, combined with data on soil physicochemical properties, microbial biomass and extracellular enzyme activities, this study systematically analyzed the combined effects of litter quantity and quality on soil CH4 flux and identified the key driving pathways. [Important findings] The results showed that: (1) forest type significantly affected soil CH4 uptake rates (P<0.001), with annual CH4 uptake in coniferous forests significantly higher than in broad-leaved forests; (2) the effect of litter input quantity on CH4 fluxes differed between forest types: DL significantly reduced CH4 uptake in broad-leaved forests (P<0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed among treatments in coniferous forests (P>0.05); (3) soil CH4 uptake was synergistically regulated by soil physicochemical properties and microbial extracellular enzymes, with soil pH and total nitrogen showing higher relative importance in coniferous forests, while soil moisture and β-glucosidase activity were more important in broad-leaved forests. This study demonstrates that subalpine forest soil CH4 sink function is primarily controlled by forest type divergence, with the effect of litter input quantity being more pronounced in broad-leaved forests, and the regulatory pathways varying with forests. These findings provide important theoretical basis and data support for accurately assessing forest C sequestration potential and optimizing parameters in Earth system models.

Key words: Carbon cycle, Methane flux, Litter input, Forest types, Subalpine area, Soil