植物生态学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 599-605.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0080
收稿日期:
2004-03-18
接受日期:
2004-07-01
出版日期:
2005-03-18
发布日期:
2005-07-31
通讯作者:
张奠湘
作者简介:
E-mail: wyqx@163.net
基金资助:
WANG Ying-Qiang1,2(), ZHANG Dian-Xiang1,*(
), CHEN Zhong-Yi1
Received:
2004-03-18
Accepted:
2004-07-01
Online:
2005-03-18
Published:
2005-07-31
Contact:
ZHANG Dian-Xiang
About author:
* E-mail: dx-zhang@scib.ac.cn摘要:
益智(Alpinia oxyphylla)的花期从2月底至4月下旬;单株花期(花序)约为16~26 d,通常为23~26 d;单花花期一般为1 d。正常情况下,益智和其它山姜属植物一样,具有花柱卷曲性促进异花授粉的机制,表现出两种类型:花柱上举型和花柱下垂型,其花柱卷曲运动的节律与其它已报道的山姜属植物基本一致。但观察发现,当遭遇低温天气时(日最高气温<18℃),单花花期延长为2 d,无论是上举型个体还是下垂型个体,均只表现出一种花型——下垂型:上午开花时花柱弯向上,柱头位于已开裂散发出花粉的花药上方,直到第二天上午6:30~11:00间,花柱才陆续地慢慢向下运动,柱头下降至与花药等高或位于花药下方。益智的主要传粉昆虫是蜜蜂(Apidae sp.)、木蜂(Xylocopa sp.),绝大多数的访花者的访花目的是吸蜜。益智的花蜜分泌量(8.37~15.79 μl)和花蜜含糖量(30.12%~32.83%)较高,花蜜是益智作为传粉者访花的最主要的报酬。实验结果还表明,益智花部中唇瓣对昆虫访花有显著的招引作用;益智的花蜜对蜜蜂的访花频率有显著的影响,对木蜂有一定的招引作用,但并不显著。而花粉(花药)则对昆虫的访花频率影响不大。人工授粉实验结果表明益智存在自交亲和性,无论是上举型或下垂型个体自交和异交均有较高的结实率;人工自交和异交的结实率在上举型植株中存在较大的差异,而在下垂型个体中则差异不明显;去雄套袋、去柱头套袋和完全套袋不授粉等处理均不结实,表明益智不存在无融合生殖现象和自动自花授粉现象。益智的繁育系统是异花授粉交配系统。
王英强, 张奠湘, 陈忠毅. 益智传粉生物学的研究. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(4): 599-605. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0080
WANG Ying-Qiang, ZHANG Dian-Xiang, CHEN Zhong-Yi. A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE POLLINATION BIOLOGY OF ALPINIA OXYPHYLLA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(4): 599-605. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0080
图1 益智花及其访花者 A: 下垂型花(上午) A cataflexistylous flower in the morning B~C: 下垂型花凋谢后第二至三天时柱头卷曲情况The cataflexistylous flowers in the second day and third day after fading D: 上举型花(上午)An anaflexistylous flower in the morning E~F: 上举型花凋谢后第二至三天时柱头卷曲情况The anaflexistylous flowers in the second day and third day after fading G~H: 蜜蜂访花吸蜜、采花粉An Apidae sp. visiting the flowers for nectar or pollen gains I: 食蚜蝇访花A Syrphidae sp. visiting a flower J~K: 木蜂访花A Xylocopa sp. visiting the flowers L: 咖啡透翅天蛾访花A Cephonodes hylas visiting a flower
Fig.1 Flowers and visitors of Alpinia oxyphylla
类型 Morph | 花粉数/花 Pollen grains | 胚珠数/花 Ovules | 花粉数/胚珠比率 P/O ratio | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上举型 Anaflexistyly | 8 890±2 402.69 | 25.8±1.99 | 345.67±90.64 | |||||
下垂型 Cataflexistyly | 6 380±779.49 | 26.3±3.87 | 246.79±41.87 | |||||
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||
t-检验 t-test | 3.142 3 | 0.363 3 | 3.131 8 | |||||
p | <0.005 | 0.36 | <0.005 |
表1 益智的单花花粉量、胚珠数及花粉/胚珠比率(P/O)
Table 1 A comparison of pollen number per flower and pollen-ovule ratio between the cataflexistylous type and the anaflexistylous type in Alpinia oxyphylla (mean±SD)
类型 Morph | 花粉数/花 Pollen grains | 胚珠数/花 Ovules | 花粉数/胚珠比率 P/O ratio | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上举型 Anaflexistyly | 8 890±2 402.69 | 25.8±1.99 | 345.67±90.64 | |||||
下垂型 Cataflexistyly | 6 380±779.49 | 26.3±3.87 | 246.79±41.87 | |||||
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||
t-检验 t-test | 3.142 3 | 0.363 3 | 3.131 8 | |||||
p | <0.005 | 0.36 | <0.005 |
图4 益智传粉昆虫的访花序频率 蜜蜂1,木蜂1代表2003年3月9~11日(日最高气温<18℃)的访花频率; 蜜蜂2,木蜂2代表2003年3月15~16日和2002年3月27~28日(日最高气温>20℃)的访花频率
Fig.4 The visiting frequency of visitors to flowers of Alpinia oxyphylla (mean±SD,n=5) Apidae 1, Xylocopa 1-indicating the visiting frequency during days when the maximal air temperature was under 18 ℃; Apidae 2, Xylocopa 2-indicating the visiting frequency during days when the maximal air temperature was above 20 ℃
传粉者 Pollinators | 首次访花后柱头上的花粉数 The number of poller grains deposited on the stigma after being visited for the first time | 模拟传粉昆虫访花授粉后的结实率 The seed sets of pollination treatments in mocking visitors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1次 One time | 3次 Three times | 6次 Six times | 平均 Average | ||
蜜蜂Apidae sp. | 4.80±6.96(n=55) | 72.67±30.04(n=22) | 68.33±41.00(n=16) | 88±17.89(n=26) | 76.33±10.33 |
木蜂Xylocopa sp. | 46.28±59.36(n=21) | 68.89±10.18(n=13) | 75±25(n=10) | 100±0(n=12) | 81.30±16.48 |
表2 两种主要传粉者的传粉效率比较(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 2 A comparison of the pollination efficiency between the two main pollinators (mean±SD)
传粉者 Pollinators | 首次访花后柱头上的花粉数 The number of poller grains deposited on the stigma after being visited for the first time | 模拟传粉昆虫访花授粉后的结实率 The seed sets of pollination treatments in mocking visitors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1次 One time | 3次 Three times | 6次 Six times | 平均 Average | ||
蜜蜂Apidae sp. | 4.80±6.96(n=55) | 72.67±30.04(n=22) | 68.33±41.00(n=16) | 88±17.89(n=26) | 76.33±10.33 |
木蜂Xylocopa sp. | 46.28±59.36(n=21) | 68.89±10.18(n=13) | 75±25(n=10) | 100±0(n=12) | 81.30±16.48 |
图6 花数/花序、花蜜对访花昆虫的招引效应 a: 不吸蜜 Without extracting nectar b: 吸蜜 Extracting nectar c: 1~2朵花 1-2 flowers d: 3~4朵花 3-4 flowers e: 5~6朵花5-6 flowers
Fig.6 The visiting frequency of pollinators in racemes with different flower numbers or nectar volumes (mean±SD,n=5)
类型 Morph | 处理 Treatments | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
自然对照 Control (n/N) | 去雌套袋 Stigmas cut and bagged (n/N) | 去雄套袋 Anthers cut and bagged (n/N) | 不授粉套袋 Bagged (n/N) | 异型异花授粉 Cross pollination between morphs (n/N) | 自花授粉 Self pollination (n/N) | |
下弯型 Cataflexistyly | 73.14±13.95 (555/10) | 0 (100/15) | 0 (99/15) | 0 (530/10) | 95.14±6.82 (52/10) | 98±4.47 (54/10) |
上举型 Anaflexistyly | 57.73±22.11 (438/10) | 0 (100/10) | 0 (100/10) | 0 (509/10) | 86.33±15.02 (46/10) | 47.34±36.65 (49/10) |
表3 不同授粉处理的结实率比较(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 3 Comparison of seed set (%) at different pollination treatments (mean±SD)
类型 Morph | 处理 Treatments | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
自然对照 Control (n/N) | 去雌套袋 Stigmas cut and bagged (n/N) | 去雄套袋 Anthers cut and bagged (n/N) | 不授粉套袋 Bagged (n/N) | 异型异花授粉 Cross pollination between morphs (n/N) | 自花授粉 Self pollination (n/N) | |
下弯型 Cataflexistyly | 73.14±13.95 (555/10) | 0 (100/15) | 0 (99/15) | 0 (530/10) | 95.14±6.82 (52/10) | 98±4.47 (54/10) |
上举型 Anaflexistyly | 57.73±22.11 (438/10) | 0 (100/10) | 0 (100/10) | 0 (509/10) | 86.33±15.02 (46/10) | 47.34±36.65 (49/10) |
[1] | Baker HG (1955). Self-compatibility and establishment after “long distance” dispersal. Evolution, 9,347-349. |
[2] |
Barrett SCH, Harder LD (1996). Ecology and evolution of plant mating. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11,73-78.
DOI URL PMID |
[3] | Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18,237-268. |
[4] | Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1990). Inbreeding depression with heterozygote advantage and its effect on selection for modifiers changing the outcrossing rate. Evolution, 44,870-888. |
[5] | Cruden RW (1977). Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution, 31,32-46. |
[6] | Cui XL, Wei RC, Huang RF (1996). A study on the breeding system of Amomum tsaoko. In: Wu TL, Wu QG, Chen ZY eds. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on the Family Zingiberaceae. Zhongshan University Press, Guangzhou,288-296. |
[7] | Dafni A (1992). Pollination Ecology, a Practical Approach. Oxford University Press , Oxford. |
[8] | Darwin C (1876). The Effect of Cross and Self fertilization in Vegetable Kingdom. Murray, London. |
[9] |
de Jong TJ, Waser NM, Klinkhamer PGL (1993). Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8,321-325.
URL PMID |
[10] | Geber MA (1985). The relationship of plant size to self-pollination in Mertensia cilata. Ecology, 66,762-777. |
[11] | Harder LD, Barrett SCH (1995). Mating cost of large floral display in hermaphrodite plant. Nature, 372,512-515. |
[12] | Harder LD, Barrett SCH (1996). Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal pollinated plants. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH eds. Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants. Chapman and Hall, New York,140-190. |
[13] | Hessing MB (1988). Geitonogamous pollination and its consequences in Geranium caespitosum. American Journal of Botany, 75,1324-1333. |
[14] | Holsinger KE (1991). Inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 6,307-308. |
[15] | Holsinger KE (1988). Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. Evolution, 42,1235-1244. |
[16] | Huang SQ(黄双全), Guo YH(郭友好) (2000). New advances in pollination biology and studies in China. Chinese Science Bulletin (科学通报), 45,223-237. (in Chinese) |
[17] | Kalisz S, Vogler D, Fails B, Finer M, Shepard E, Herman T, Gonzales R (1999). The mechanism of delayed selfing in Collinsia verna (Scrophularicaceae). American Journal of Botany, 86,1239-1247. |
[18] |
Lande R, Schemske DW (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution, 39,24-40.
URL PMID |
[19] | Les DH (1988). Breeding systems, population structure, and evolution in hydrophilous angiosperms. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 75,819-835. |
[20] | Li QJ(李庆军), Xu ZF(许再富), Xia YM(夏永梅), Zhang L (张玲), Deng XB(邓晓保), Gao JY(高江云) (2001). Study on the flexistyly pollination mechanism in Alpinia plants (Zingiberaceae). Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 43,364-369. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Li QJ, Kress WJ, Xu ZF, Xia YM, Zhang L, Deng XB, Gao JY (2002). Masting system and stigmatic behavior during flowering of Alpinia kwangsiensis (Zingiberaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 232,123-132. |
[22] | Li QJ, Xu ZF, Kress WJ, Xia YM, Zhang L, Deng XB, Gao JY (2001). Flexible style that encourages outcrossing. Nature, 410,432. |
[23] | Li QJ(李庆军) (2002). Study on the Flexistyle Outcrossing Mechanism in Alpinia plants (Zingiberaceae)(山姜属植物的花柱卷曲性异交机制的研究). Ph.D. dissertation of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Lloyd DG (1979). Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist, 113,67-79. |
[25] | Lloyd DG (1992). Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Science, 153,370-380. |
[26] | Richards AJ (1997). Plant Breeding Systems 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London. |
[27] | Rodriguez-Ria†o T, Dafni A (2000). A new procedure to assess pollen viability. Sexual Plant Reproduction, 12,241-244. |
[28] |
Sakai S (1995). Evolutionary stable selfing rates of hermaphroditic plants with competing and delayed selfing modes with allocation to attractive structures. Evolution, 49,557-564.
DOI URL PMID |
[29] | Schoen D, Brown ADH (1991). Whole and part flower self-pollination in Glycine clandestine and G. argyrea and the evolution of autogamy. Evolution, 45,1651-1664. |
[30] | Snow AA, Spira TP, Simpson R, Klips RA (1996). The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH eds. Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants. Chappman and Hall, New York,191-216. |
[31] | Throp RW, Briggs DL, Estes JR (1975). Nectar fluorescence under ultraviolet irradiation. Science, 189,476-478. |
[32] |
Williams CF, Ruvinsky J, Scott PE, Hews DK (2001). Pollination, breeding system, and genetic structure in two sympatric Delphinium (Ranunculaceae) species. American Journal of Botany, 88,1623-1633.
URL PMID |
[33] | Wang YQ, Zhang DX, Chen ZY (2004). Pollen histochemistry and pollen: ovule ratios in Zingiberaceae. Annals of Botany, 94,583-591. |
[34] | Wyatt R (1982). Inflorescence architecture: how flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit-set. American Journal of Botany, 69,585-594. |
[35] | Zhang L(张玲), Li QJ(李庆军) (2002). Flexistyly and its evolutionary ecological significance. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 26,385-390. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] | Zhang L, Li QJ, Deng XB, Ren PY, Gao JY (2003). Reproductive biology of Alpinia blepharocalyx (Zingiberaceae): another example of flexistyly. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 241,67-76. |
[1] | 哈里布努尔, 古丽扎尔·阿不都克力木, 热依拉穆·麦麦提吐尔逊, 艾沙江·阿不都沙拉木. 黑果枸杞两种花型的花部综合征与传粉特性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1050-1063. |
[2] | 苏启陶, 杜志喧, 周兵, 廖永辉, 王呈呈, 肖宜安. 牯岭凤仙花及其传粉昆虫在中国的潜在分布区域分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 785-796. |
[3] | 曾凯娜, 孙浩然, 申益春, 任明迅. 海南羊山湿地的传粉网络及其季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 775-784. |
[4] | 张迪, 都业勤, 王磊, 陈鑫, 闫兴富, 唐占辉. 两种生境间大花百合不同性别表型开花及传粉特征的差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 580-592. |
[5] | 阿依古丽•阿卜杜热伊木, 焦芳芳, 张爱勤. 异型花柱植物喀什补血草的传粉者功能群与花粉转移效率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(1): 51-61. |
[6] | 程汉亭, 李勤奋, 刘景坤, 严廷良, 张俏燕, 王进闯. 橡胶林下益智光合特性的季节动态变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(5): 585-594. |
[7] | 张亭, 王波, 苗白鸽, 彭艳琼. 榕树隐头花序挥发物组成及其传粉榕小蜂寄主识别行为[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(5): 549-558. |
[8] | 黄艳波, 魏宇昆, 王琦, 肖月娥, 叶喜阳. 舌瓣鼠尾草退化杠杆雄蕊的相关花部特征及传粉机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(7): 753-761. |
[9] | 吴云, 刘玉蓉, 彭瀚, 杨勇, 刘光立, 操国兴, 张强. 高山植物全缘叶绿绒蒿在不同海拔地区的传粉生态学研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(1): 1-13. |
[10] | 田润炜,陆嘉惠,李学禹,余营,谢良碧,秦忠立. 光果甘草二体雄蕊的发育及其适应意义[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7): 641-649. |
[11] | 张勃, 孙杉, 方强恩, 白小明. 鼠尾草属不同物种的雄蕊杠杆机制对传粉者空间变异的进化响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(7): 681-689. |
[12] | 戴攀峰, 谭敦炎. 雪莲的开花生物学特性及其生态适应意义[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(1): 56-65. |
[13] | 曾建军, 肖宜安, 孙敏. 入侵植物剑叶金鸡菊的繁殖特征及其与入侵性之间的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(8): 966-972. |
[14] | 任明迅. 两性花的雄蕊运动: 多样性和适应意义[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(7): 867-875. |
[15] | 孙杉, 操国兴, 罗燕江, 李庆军. 花柱卷曲性的维持及功能性别特化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(7): 827-838. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19