Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 1082-1094.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.01082
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Jun, CHEN Gui-Qing, XU Wei-Hong*(), HAN Gui-Qi, ZHANG Hai-Bo, WANG Hui-Xian, ZHANG Ming- Zhong
Received:
2012-02-15
Accepted:
2012-06-05
Online:
2012-02-15
Published:
2012-09-26
Contact:
XU Wei-Hong
LIU Jun, CHEN Gui-Qing, XU Wei-Hong, HAN Gui-Qi, ZHANG Hai-Bo, WANG Hui-Xian, ZHANG Ming- Zhong. Effects of Zn treatment on physiological characteristics, photosynthesis, ultrastructure of root tip cell and grain Zn accumulation in different varieties of rape[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(10): 1082-1094.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.01082
Fig. 1 Comparisons of super oxygen dehydrogenises (SOD) activity of different rape varieties (mean ± SE). ENW, Brassica juncea ‘Erniuwei’; H33, B. napus ‘H33’; LPJCZ, B. juncea ‘Luopingjincaizi’; NTHYC, B. chinensis ‘Nantonghuangyoucai’; SYKC, B. juncea ‘Liyangkucai’. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05).
Zn处理 Zn treatment (mg·kg-1) | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 根 Root | 籽粒 Grain | 总干重 Total dry weight | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety | ||||||
‘罗平金菜子’ ‘Luopingjincaizi’ | 0 | 15.77 ± 0.58 | 2.15 ± 0.13 | 2.06 ± 0.04 | 12.31 ± 0.33 | 32.29 ± 0.22 |
1 | 16.82 ± 0.73 | 2.57 ± 0.09 | 2.78 ± 0.07 | 14.00 ± 0.35 | 36.17 ± 0.30 | |
5 | 18.02 ± 0.66 | 3.77 ± 0.11 | 3.69 ± 0.09 | 16.95 ± 0.27 | 42.43 ± 0.49 | |
10 | 17.23 ± 0.50 | 2.32 ± 0.12 | 2.55 ± 0.02 | 15.73 ± 0.13 | 37.83 ± 0.37 | |
20 | 14.31 ± 0.42 | 2.01 ± 0.08 | 2.01 ± 0.03 | 14.28 ± 0.21 | 32.61 ± 0.32 | |
‘二牛尾’ ‘Erniuwei’ | 0 | 32.41 ± 0.81 | 8.76 ± 0.25 | 3.11 ± 0.11 | 13.78 ± 0.26 | 58.06 ± 0.65 |
1 | 37.14 ± 0.67 | 9.33 ± 0.27 | 3.97 ± 0.08 | 14.01 ± 0.22 | 64.45 ± 0.61 | |
5 | 39.88 ± 0.73 | 10.79 ± 0.31 | 5.01 ± 0.12 | 17.01 ± 0.46 | 72.69 ± 0.78 | |
10 | 35.17 ± 0.49 | 10.11 ± 0.26 | 4.37 ± 0.15 | 15.69 ± 0.53 | 65.34 ± 0.69 | |
20 | 29.36 ± 0.38 | 9.17 ± 0.19 | 2.99 ± 0.10 | 10.59 ± 0.29 | 52.11 ± 0.39 | |
‘溧阳苦菜’ ‘Liyangkucai’ | 0 | 37.26 ± 0.75 | 10.28 ± 0.34 | 2.58 ± 0.09 | 12.63 ± 0.26 | 62.75 ± 0.61 |
1 | 41.55 ± 0.82 | 13.11 ± 0.25 | 3.02 ± 0.08 | 13.33 ± 0.30 | 71.01 ± 0.86 | |
5 | 43.12 ± 0.91 | 15.47 ± 0.23 | 3.47 ± 0.16 | 16.35 ± 0.43 | 78.41 ± 0.54 | |
10 | 40.88 ± 0.65 | 14.79 ± 0.35 | 2.52 ± 0.05 | 10.95 ± 0.17 | 69.14 ± 0.42 | |
20 | 35.17 ± 0.58 | 11.25 ± 0.31 | 2.59 ± 0.07 | 10.51 ± 0.11 | 59.52 ± 0.35 | |
‘南通黄油菜’ ‘Nantonghuang- youcai’ | 0 | 21.11 ± 0.49 | 2.38 ± 0.07 | 2.51 ± 0.04 | 8.94 ± 0.10 | 34.94 ± 0.29 |
1 | 23.85 ± 0.33 | 3.96 ± 0.10 | 2.94 ± 0.05 | 13.43 ± 0.27 | 44.18 ± 0.42 | |
5 | 28.27 ± 0.25 | 5.17 ± 0.12 | 3.18 ± 0.12 | 16.32 ± 0.39 | 52.94 ± 0.48 | |
10 | 25.97 ± 0.29 | 4.63 ± 0.15 | 3.67 ± 0.10 | 10.59 ± 0.15 | 44.86 ± 0.25 | |
20 | 22.69 ± 0.36 | 2.02 ± 0.05 | 4.21 ± 0.19 | 10.45 ± 0.14 | 39.37 ± 0.31 | |
‘H33’ | 0 | 26.34 ± 0.24 | 3.17 ± 0.11 | 1.58 ± 0.05 | 14.98 ± 0.28 | 46.07 ± 0.29 |
1 | 27.91 ± 0.41 | 4.79 ± 0.17 | 1.82 ± 0.03 | 16.22 ± 0.32 | 50.74 ± 0.35 | |
5 | 30.27 ± 0.30 | 5.21 ± 0.23 | 2.34 ± 0.07 | 17.68 ± 0.36 | 55.5 ± 0.39 | |
10 | 28.89 ± 0.25 | 4.07 ± 0.14 | 2.07 ± 0.09 | 14.08 ± 0.34 | 49.11 ± 0.45 | |
20 | 27.21 ± 0.17 | 3.34 ± 0.26 | 2.01 ± 0.14 | 13.06 ± 0.30 | 45.62 ± 0.36 | |
p | ||||||
品种 Variety | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.005 | <0.001 | |
Zn处理 Zn treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
品种× Zn处理 Variety × Zn treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Effect of different Zn treatments on dry weight of rape (Brassica) (g·pot-1) (mean ± SE)
Zn处理 Zn treatment (mg·kg-1) | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 根 Root | 籽粒 Grain | 总干重 Total dry weight | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety | ||||||
‘罗平金菜子’ ‘Luopingjincaizi’ | 0 | 15.77 ± 0.58 | 2.15 ± 0.13 | 2.06 ± 0.04 | 12.31 ± 0.33 | 32.29 ± 0.22 |
1 | 16.82 ± 0.73 | 2.57 ± 0.09 | 2.78 ± 0.07 | 14.00 ± 0.35 | 36.17 ± 0.30 | |
5 | 18.02 ± 0.66 | 3.77 ± 0.11 | 3.69 ± 0.09 | 16.95 ± 0.27 | 42.43 ± 0.49 | |
10 | 17.23 ± 0.50 | 2.32 ± 0.12 | 2.55 ± 0.02 | 15.73 ± 0.13 | 37.83 ± 0.37 | |
20 | 14.31 ± 0.42 | 2.01 ± 0.08 | 2.01 ± 0.03 | 14.28 ± 0.21 | 32.61 ± 0.32 | |
‘二牛尾’ ‘Erniuwei’ | 0 | 32.41 ± 0.81 | 8.76 ± 0.25 | 3.11 ± 0.11 | 13.78 ± 0.26 | 58.06 ± 0.65 |
1 | 37.14 ± 0.67 | 9.33 ± 0.27 | 3.97 ± 0.08 | 14.01 ± 0.22 | 64.45 ± 0.61 | |
5 | 39.88 ± 0.73 | 10.79 ± 0.31 | 5.01 ± 0.12 | 17.01 ± 0.46 | 72.69 ± 0.78 | |
10 | 35.17 ± 0.49 | 10.11 ± 0.26 | 4.37 ± 0.15 | 15.69 ± 0.53 | 65.34 ± 0.69 | |
20 | 29.36 ± 0.38 | 9.17 ± 0.19 | 2.99 ± 0.10 | 10.59 ± 0.29 | 52.11 ± 0.39 | |
‘溧阳苦菜’ ‘Liyangkucai’ | 0 | 37.26 ± 0.75 | 10.28 ± 0.34 | 2.58 ± 0.09 | 12.63 ± 0.26 | 62.75 ± 0.61 |
1 | 41.55 ± 0.82 | 13.11 ± 0.25 | 3.02 ± 0.08 | 13.33 ± 0.30 | 71.01 ± 0.86 | |
5 | 43.12 ± 0.91 | 15.47 ± 0.23 | 3.47 ± 0.16 | 16.35 ± 0.43 | 78.41 ± 0.54 | |
10 | 40.88 ± 0.65 | 14.79 ± 0.35 | 2.52 ± 0.05 | 10.95 ± 0.17 | 69.14 ± 0.42 | |
20 | 35.17 ± 0.58 | 11.25 ± 0.31 | 2.59 ± 0.07 | 10.51 ± 0.11 | 59.52 ± 0.35 | |
‘南通黄油菜’ ‘Nantonghuang- youcai’ | 0 | 21.11 ± 0.49 | 2.38 ± 0.07 | 2.51 ± 0.04 | 8.94 ± 0.10 | 34.94 ± 0.29 |
1 | 23.85 ± 0.33 | 3.96 ± 0.10 | 2.94 ± 0.05 | 13.43 ± 0.27 | 44.18 ± 0.42 | |
5 | 28.27 ± 0.25 | 5.17 ± 0.12 | 3.18 ± 0.12 | 16.32 ± 0.39 | 52.94 ± 0.48 | |
10 | 25.97 ± 0.29 | 4.63 ± 0.15 | 3.67 ± 0.10 | 10.59 ± 0.15 | 44.86 ± 0.25 | |
20 | 22.69 ± 0.36 | 2.02 ± 0.05 | 4.21 ± 0.19 | 10.45 ± 0.14 | 39.37 ± 0.31 | |
‘H33’ | 0 | 26.34 ± 0.24 | 3.17 ± 0.11 | 1.58 ± 0.05 | 14.98 ± 0.28 | 46.07 ± 0.29 |
1 | 27.91 ± 0.41 | 4.79 ± 0.17 | 1.82 ± 0.03 | 16.22 ± 0.32 | 50.74 ± 0.35 | |
5 | 30.27 ± 0.30 | 5.21 ± 0.23 | 2.34 ± 0.07 | 17.68 ± 0.36 | 55.5 ± 0.39 | |
10 | 28.89 ± 0.25 | 4.07 ± 0.14 | 2.07 ± 0.09 | 14.08 ± 0.34 | 49.11 ± 0.45 | |
20 | 27.21 ± 0.17 | 3.34 ± 0.26 | 2.01 ± 0.14 | 13.06 ± 0.30 | 45.62 ± 0.36 | |
p | ||||||
品种 Variety | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.005 | <0.001 | |
Zn处理 Zn treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
品种× Zn处理 Variety × Zn treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Fig. 2 Comparisons of catalase (CAT) activity of different rape varieties (mean ± SE). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments. Variety see Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 Comparisons of peroxidase (POD) activity of different rape varieties (mean ± SE). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments. Variety see Fig. 1.
Fig. 4 Comparisons of malondialdehyde (MDA) content of different rape varieties (mean ± SE). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments. Variety see Fig. 1.
Zn处理 Zn treatment (mg·kg-1) | 净光合速率 Pn (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs (mol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr (mmol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci (μmol·mol-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety | |||||
‘罗平金菜子’ ‘Luopingjincaizi’ | 0 | 9.01 ± 0.75 | 0.204 ± 0.001 | 4.77 ± 0.12 | 276 ± 3.11 |
1 | 9.88 ± 0.63 | 0.215 ± 0.004 | 5.49 ± 0.17 | 272 ± 2.19 | |
5 | 11.69 ± 0.62 | 0.246 ± 0.003 | 5.83 ± 0.21 | 235 ± 1.13 | |
10 | 12.76 ± 0.59 | 0.255 ± 0.004 | 6.45 ± 0.13 | 276 ± 2.05 | |
20 | 14.65 ± 0.85 | 0.258 ± 0.006 | 7.06 ± 0.19 | 285 ± 2.21 | |
‘二牛尾’ ‘Erniuwei’ | 0 | 10.97 ± 0.54 | 0.108 ± 0.001 | 2.86 ± 0.09 | 199 ± 1.10 |
1 | 15.46 ± 0.73 | 0.254 ± 0.003 | 4.49 ± 0.14 | 228 ± 2.16 | |
5 | 17.67 ± 0.36 | 0.442 ± 0.007 | 6.65 ± 0.18 | 236 ± 2.32 | |
10 | 14.97 ± 0.84 | 0.244 ± 0.003 | 3.83 ± 0.10 | 257 ± 1.76 | |
20 | 10.43 ± 0.32 | 0.092 ± 0.001 | 2.01 ± 0.08 | 271 ± 1.55 | |
‘溧阳苦菜’ ‘Liyangkucai’ | 0 | 14.46 ± 0.55 | 0.375 ± 0.004 | 6.75 ± 0.25 | 309 ± 3.37 |
1 | 14.92 ± 0.69 | 0.399 ± 0.003 | 6.92 ± 0.27 | 286 ± 2.49 | |
5 | 16.38 ± 0.63 | 0.427 ± 0.007 | 6.67 ± 0.21 | 237 ± 1.31 | |
10 | 12.55 ± 0.27 | 0.258 ± 0.005 | 3.87 ± 0.16 | 286 ± 1.09 | |
20 | 9.76 ± 0.21 | 0.153 ± 0.003 | 2.03 ± 0.12 | 304 ± 2.67 | |
‘南通黄油菜’ ‘Nantonghuangyoucai’ | 0 | 7.99 ± 0.16 | 0.206 ± 0.002 | 3.12 ± 0.14 | 329 ± 2.98 |
1 | 9.64 ± 0.33 | 0.343 ± 0.005 | 4.48 ± 0.19 | 319 ± 3.11 | |
5 | 11.53 ± 0.28 | 0.391 ± 0.004 | 4.81 ± 0.16 | 324 ± 2.58 | |
10 | 9.16 ± 0.11 | 0.236 ± 0.001 | 3.96 ± 0.11 | 342 ± 3.09 | |
20 | 7.21 ± 0.13 | 0.156 ± 0.002 | 2.69 ± 0.07 | 399 ± 3.11 | |
‘H33’ | 0 | 13.17 ± 0.25 | 0.283 ± 0.004 | 5.79 ± 0.20 | 308 ± 2.67 |
1 | 14.72 ± 0.34 | 0.295 ± 0.003 | 6.21 ± 0.22 | 297 ± 2.16 | |
5 | 16.64 ± 0.58 | 0.319 ± 0.005 | 6.97 ± 0.29 | 285 ± 1.89 | |
10 | 15.05 ± 0.45 | 0.326 ± 0.003 | 6.75 ± 0.40 | 295 ± 1.75 | |
20 | 14.62 ± 0.38 | 0.333 ± 0.001 | 6.69 ± 0.18 | 315 ± 2.93 | |
p | |||||
品种 Variety | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | |
Zn处理 Zn treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
品种×Zn处理 Variety × Zn treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Effect of different Zn treatments on photosynthetic characteristics of rape (Brassica) (mean ± SE)
Zn处理 Zn treatment (mg·kg-1) | 净光合速率 Pn (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs (mol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr (mmol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci (μmol·mol-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 Variety | |||||
‘罗平金菜子’ ‘Luopingjincaizi’ | 0 | 9.01 ± 0.75 | 0.204 ± 0.001 | 4.77 ± 0.12 | 276 ± 3.11 |
1 | 9.88 ± 0.63 | 0.215 ± 0.004 | 5.49 ± 0.17 | 272 ± 2.19 | |
5 | 11.69 ± 0.62 | 0.246 ± 0.003 | 5.83 ± 0.21 | 235 ± 1.13 | |
10 | 12.76 ± 0.59 | 0.255 ± 0.004 | 6.45 ± 0.13 | 276 ± 2.05 | |
20 | 14.65 ± 0.85 | 0.258 ± 0.006 | 7.06 ± 0.19 | 285 ± 2.21 | |
‘二牛尾’ ‘Erniuwei’ | 0 | 10.97 ± 0.54 | 0.108 ± 0.001 | 2.86 ± 0.09 | 199 ± 1.10 |
1 | 15.46 ± 0.73 | 0.254 ± 0.003 | 4.49 ± 0.14 | 228 ± 2.16 | |
5 | 17.67 ± 0.36 | 0.442 ± 0.007 | 6.65 ± 0.18 | 236 ± 2.32 | |
10 | 14.97 ± 0.84 | 0.244 ± 0.003 | 3.83 ± 0.10 | 257 ± 1.76 | |
20 | 10.43 ± 0.32 | 0.092 ± 0.001 | 2.01 ± 0.08 | 271 ± 1.55 | |
‘溧阳苦菜’ ‘Liyangkucai’ | 0 | 14.46 ± 0.55 | 0.375 ± 0.004 | 6.75 ± 0.25 | 309 ± 3.37 |
1 | 14.92 ± 0.69 | 0.399 ± 0.003 | 6.92 ± 0.27 | 286 ± 2.49 | |
5 | 16.38 ± 0.63 | 0.427 ± 0.007 | 6.67 ± 0.21 | 237 ± 1.31 | |
10 | 12.55 ± 0.27 | 0.258 ± 0.005 | 3.87 ± 0.16 | 286 ± 1.09 | |
20 | 9.76 ± 0.21 | 0.153 ± 0.003 | 2.03 ± 0.12 | 304 ± 2.67 | |
‘南通黄油菜’ ‘Nantonghuangyoucai’ | 0 | 7.99 ± 0.16 | 0.206 ± 0.002 | 3.12 ± 0.14 | 329 ± 2.98 |
1 | 9.64 ± 0.33 | 0.343 ± 0.005 | 4.48 ± 0.19 | 319 ± 3.11 | |
5 | 11.53 ± 0.28 | 0.391 ± 0.004 | 4.81 ± 0.16 | 324 ± 2.58 | |
10 | 9.16 ± 0.11 | 0.236 ± 0.001 | 3.96 ± 0.11 | 342 ± 3.09 | |
20 | 7.21 ± 0.13 | 0.156 ± 0.002 | 2.69 ± 0.07 | 399 ± 3.11 | |
‘H33’ | 0 | 13.17 ± 0.25 | 0.283 ± 0.004 | 5.79 ± 0.20 | 308 ± 2.67 |
1 | 14.72 ± 0.34 | 0.295 ± 0.003 | 6.21 ± 0.22 | 297 ± 2.16 | |
5 | 16.64 ± 0.58 | 0.319 ± 0.005 | 6.97 ± 0.29 | 285 ± 1.89 | |
10 | 15.05 ± 0.45 | 0.326 ± 0.003 | 6.75 ± 0.40 | 295 ± 1.75 | |
20 | 14.62 ± 0.38 | 0.333 ± 0.001 | 6.69 ± 0.18 | 315 ± 2.93 | |
p | |||||
品种 Variety | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | |
Zn处理 Zn treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
品种×Zn处理 Variety × Zn treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Fig. 5 Ultrastructure of root tip cell of rape (Brassica) varieties with different Zn concentrations. A, B, C, D and E represent the ultrastructure of root tip cell of LPJCZ, ENW, SYKC, NTHYC and H33 in the control, respectively. F, G, H, I and J represent the ultrastructure of root tip cell of LPJCZ, ENW, SYKC, NTHYC and H33 at 20 mg·kg-1 Zn, respectively. CW, cell wall; M, mitochondria; N, cell nucleus; V, vacuole. Variety see Fig. 1.
1 | Aziz EE, El-Din AAE, Omer EA ( 2010). Influence of zinc and iron on plant growth and chemical constituents of Cymbopogon citratus L. grown in newly in reclaimed land. International Journal of Academic Research, 2, 278-283. |
2 | Cakmak I ( 1996). A NATO-funded project: improvement of Zinc nutritional status of plants and humans in Turkey through plant breeding. Micronutrients and Agriculture, ( 1), 27-28. |
3 | Chang YX ( 常云霞), Wang HX ( 王红星), Chen L ( 陈龙 ) ( 2011). Salicylic acid mitigating the inhibition of zinc stress to wheat seedling growth. Acta Botanica Boreali- Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 31, 2052-2056. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
4 | Epstein E (1983). Crop tolerance of salinity and other mineral stresses. In: Nugent J, O’Conner M eds. Ciba Foundation Symposium97-Better Crops for Food. Pitman, London. 61-68. |
5 | Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD ( 1982). Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 33, 317-345. |
6 | Graham RD ( 1996). CGIAR micronutrients project: results of initial germplasm screening for food staples. Micronutrients and Agriculture, ( 1), 15-16. |
7 | Graham RD, Senadhira D, Beebe S, Iglesias C, Monasterio I ( 1999). Breeding for micronutrient density in edible portions of staple food crops: conventional approaches. Field Crops Research, 60, 57-80. |
8 | Han JL ( 韩金玲 ) ( 2003). Effects of Zinc on Photosynthetic Performance, Grain Yield and Quality in Winter Wheat (锌对冬小麦光合特性及产量和品质的影响). Master degree dissertation, Hebei Agriculture University,Baoding, Hebei. 15-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
9 | Hou LP ( 侯雷平), Wu JH ( 吴俊华), Li ML ( 李梅兰), Li YX ( 李远新 ) ( 2010). Effects of Zn fertilization on antioxidative capacity and flavor quality of tomato fruit. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science (植物营养与肥料学报), 16, 763-767. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
10 | Hu XY ( 胡学玉), Li XH ( 李学垣), Xie ZC ( 谢振翅 ) ( 2001). Study on characteristics of Zn efficiency of various pakchoi cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 34, 227-231. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
11 | Jain R, Srivastava S, Solomon S, Shrivastava AK, Chandra A ( 2010). Impact of excess zinc on growth parameters, cell division, nutrient accumulation, photosynthetic pigments and oxidative stress of sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 32, 979-986. |
12 | Jiang LL ( 姜丽丽), Li XH ( 李絮花), Wang C ( 王川), Li W ( 李伟), Li HY ( 李海燕 ) ( 2011). Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc fertilizer on the physiological metabolism of flag leaf on wheat. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin (中国农学通报), 27(15), 57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
13 | Jie MH ( 颉敏华), Zhang JS ( 张继澍), Jie JM ( 颉建明), Yu JH ( 郁继华 ) ( 2008). Effects of Zinc on photosynthetic characteristics in leaves of Brassica oleracea L. Vat Italicap. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences) (兰州大学学报(自然科学版)), 44(5), 35-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
14 | Li HS ( 李合生 ) (2000). Experiments of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (植物生理生化实验). High Education Press, Beijing. 165-167. (in Chinese) |
15 | Li WY ( 李文一), Xu WH ( 徐卫红), Hu XF ( 胡小凤), Li YR ( 李仰锐), Liu JZ ( 刘吉振), Wang HX ( 王宏信), Xiong ZT ( 熊治廷 ) ( 2007). Effects of zinc stress on growth, physiological and biochemical and Zn uptake of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (农业工程学报), 23(5), 190-194. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
16 | Li ZG ( 李志刚), Ye ZQ ( 叶正钱), Fang YY ( 方云英), Yang XE ( 杨肖娥 ) ( 2003). Effect of zinc on plant growth and zinc partitioning in rice plant. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 17, 61-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
17 | Lu RK ( 鲁如坤 ) (2002). Agricultural Chemical Analysis of Soil (土壤农业化学分析方法). China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. 24-214. (in Chinese) |
18 | Lu XC ( 陆欣春), Tian XH ( 田霄鸿), Yang XW ( 杨习文), Mai WX ( 买文选), Zhao AQ ( 赵爱青), Bao QL ( 保琼莉 ) ( 2010). Effect of combination use of Zn and N fertilizers on yield and Zn content in winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (中国生态农业学报), 18, 923-928. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
19 | Ou ZY ( 欧志英), Peng CL ( 彭长连), Yang CW ( 阳成伟), Lin GZ ( 林桂珠), Duan J ( 段俊), Wen X ( 温学 ) ( 2003). High efficiency photosynthetic characteristics in flag leaves of super high-yielding rice. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany (热带亚热带植物学报), 11, 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
20 | Qiu CE ( 邱昌恩), Bi YH ( 毕永红), Hu ZY ( 胡征宇 ) ( 2007). The effects of Zn 2+ stress on the growth, physiological characteristics and cell structure of Chlorococcum sp . Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica (水生生物学报), 31, 503-508. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
21 | Qu YN, Zhou Q, Yu BJ ( 2009). Effects of Zn 2+ and niflumic acid on photosynthesis in Glycine soja and Glycine max seedling under NaCl stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 65, 304-309. |
22 |
Sharma PN, Tripathi A, Bisht SS ( 1995). Zinc requirement for stomatal opening in cauliflower. Plant Physiology, 107, 751-756.
DOI URL PMID |
23 | Tang YT ( 汤叶涛), Wu YD ( 吴妤都), Qiu RL ( 仇荣亮), Zeng XW ( 曾晓雯), Hu PJ ( 胡鹏杰 ) ( 2009). Zinc uptake and accumulation in Picris divaricata Vant. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 1823-1831. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
24 | Wang H ( 汪洪), Jin JY ( 金继运 ) ( 2009). The physiological and molecular mechanisms of zinc uptake, transport, and hyperaccumulation in plants: a review. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science (植物营养与肥料学报), 15, 225-235. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
25 | Wang HX ( 王慧先), Guo JY ( 郭俊云), Xu WH ( 徐卫红), Zhang HB ( 张海波), Chen GQ ( 陈贵青), Zhang XJ ( 张晓璟), Zhao J ( 赵静), Wang ZY ( 王正银 ) ( 2011). Response and zinc use efficiency of Chinese cabbage under zinc fertilization. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science (植物营养与肥料学报), 17, 154-159. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
26 | Wang RM ( 王人民), Yang XE ( 杨肖娥), Yang YA ( 杨玉爱 ) ( 1997). Studies on the genotypic differences and its physiological characteristics of rice responses to different Zn 2+ activities . Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University (浙江农业大学学报), 23, 442-446. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
27 | Wang SY ( 王淑英), Yu TQ ( 于同泉), Wang JL ( 王建立), Yang L ( 杨柳), Yang K ( 杨凯), Lu P ( 路苹 ) ( 2008). Preliminary study on spatial variability and distribution of soil available microelements in Pinggu District of Beijing. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 41, 129-137. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
28 | Wei XR ( 魏孝荣), Hao MD ( 郝明德), Zhang CX ( 张春霞), Wang XG ( 王旭刚 ) ( 2005). Effects of zinc and manganese fertilizers on maize photosynthetic performance under soil drought condition. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 31, 1101-1104. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
29 | Xu CL ( 徐春丽), Xiao JX ( 肖家欣), Qi XX ( 齐笑笑), Zhang SL ( 张绍铃 ) ( 2010). Effect of Zn stress on photosynthetic characteristic and their correlation of the two varieties of Citrus. Journal of Biology (生物学杂志), 27(6), 42-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
30 | Xu QS ( 徐勤松), Shi GX ( 施国新), Du KH ( 杜开和 ) ( 2001). Studies on correlation between peroxidation damage by free radicals and ultrastructural changes of mesophyll cells in Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers induced by Zn pollution. Bulletin of Botany (植物学通报), 18, 597-604. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
31 | Xu QS ( 徐勤松), Shi GX ( 施国新), Wang X ( 王学), Dingt BZ ( 丁秉中), Chen SY ( 陈苏雅), Xu BJ ( 许丙军), Zhao J ( 赵娟 ) ( 2006). Subcellular localization of Pb in cells of Eichhornia crassipes Solms by electron microscopy. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Natural Science Edition) (南京师大学报(自然科学版)), 29, 81-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
32 | Xu WH, Huang H, Xiong ZT ( 2005). Effects of Zn stress on Zn accumulation and anti-oxidant enzymes activity in four varieties of ryegrass. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 10, 1051-1056. |
33 | Yang JH ( 杨剑虹), Wang CQ ( 王成秋), Dai HL ( 代享林 ) (2008). Soil Agricultural Chemical Analysis and Environmental Monitoring (土壤农化分析与环境监测). China Land Press, Beijing. 16-310(in Chinese) |
34 | Zhang ZL ( 张志良), Wang YD ( 王英典), Liu N ( 刘宁 ) (2002). Experimental Guidance for Plant Biology (植物生物学实验指导). High Education Press, Beijing. 154-155. (in Chinese) |
[1] | CHEN Shi-Wei,LIU Min-Xia,JIA Yun,AN Qi,AN Yan-Fei. Community succession and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of pasture plants in a sub-alpine meadow in Gannan, China [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(4): 343-351. |
[2] | ZHENG Ya-Ping,XIN Cai-Yun,WANG Cai-Bin,SUN Xiu-Shan,YANG Wei-Qiang,WAN Shu-Bo,ZHENG Yong-Mei,FENG Hao,CHEN Dian-Xu,SUN Xue-Wu,WU Zheng-Feng. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer on root morphology, physiological characteristics and yield in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(8): 777-785. |
[3] | YANG Peng, XU Xiao. Effects of waterlogging stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of male and female Populus cathayana seedlings [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(1): 81-87. |
[4] | WANG Qing-Hai, ZHANG Wei, QUE Xiao-E, WU Ju-Ying, ZHANG Guo-An, XIAO Bo. Effects of atrazine residue in water on biomass and physiological characteristics of Scirpus tabernaemontani [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(2): 223-231. |
[5] | MAI Bo-Ru, ZHENG You-Fei, WU Rong-Jun, LIANG Jun, LIU Xia. Effects of simulated sulfur-rich, nitric-rich and mixed acid rain on the physiology, growth and yield of rape (Brassica napus) [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(4): 427-437. |
[6] | IU Zhao-Pu, DENG Li-Qun, LIU Ling, QI Chang-Hai, CHEN Ming-Da, XIA Tian-Xiang. PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS IRRIGATED BY SEAWATER, LAIZHOU COAST, SHANDONG PROVINCE [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2005, 29(3): 474-478. |
[7] | LI Qing-Kang, MA Ke-Ping. ADVANCES IN PLANT SUCCESSION ECOPHYSIOLOGY [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2002, 26(增刊): 9-19. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn