植物生态学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1116-1125.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.016
岳鹏鹏1,2, 卢学峰1, 叶润蓉1, 周玉碧1,2, 杨仕兵1,2, 张长现1,2, 彭敏1,*()
收稿日期:
2007-11-19
接受日期:
2008-03-27
出版日期:
2008-11-19
发布日期:
2008-09-30
通讯作者:
彭敏
作者简介:
*(pengm@nwipb.ac.cn)基金资助:
YUE Peng-Peng1,2, LU Xue-Feng1, YE Run-Rong1, ZHOU Yu-Bi1,2, YANG Shi-Bing1,2, ZHANG Chang- Xian1,2, PENG Min1,*()
Received:
2007-11-19
Accepted:
2008-03-27
Online:
2008-11-19
Published:
2008-09-30
Contact:
PENG Min
摘要:
选择江河源区玛多、曲麻莱、同德3地区的典型紫花针茅(Stipa purpurea)草原为研究对象, 采用样线和样方相结合的方法调查群落, 初步分析了江河源区紫花针茅草原的群落特征。结果表明: 1)所调查紫花针茅草原群落是物种组成比较简单、北温带分布的属为主体的草原群落。2)所有样线经聚类分析可归为3个群落类型: 紫花针 茅+二裂委陵菜(Potentilla bifurca)群落(Ⅰ)、紫花针茅+高山嵩草(Kobresia pygmaea)群落(Ⅱ)、紫花针茅+川青早熟禾(Poa indattenuata)群落(Ⅲ), 且各群落分布于不同区域。虽然这3个群落类型都是典型的紫花针茅群落, 但各自的群落结构还是存在一定差异, 群落相似性分析结果表明群落Ⅰ和Ⅱ的相似性较高, 群落Ⅰ和Ⅲ的相似性较低。3)紫花针茅草原的群落分布呈现出小尺度区域同质性和大尺度异域异质性的特点。4)所调查紫花针茅草原群落的均匀度指数、Shannon-Wiener指数和Simpson指数间以及它们和纬度间均呈显著相关。各α多样性指数在3个地区的群落间表现出基本一致的变化规律, 按均匀度指数、Shannon-Wiener指数和Simpson指数从大到小的顺序依次是: 群落Ⅱ>群落Ⅲ>群落Ⅰ。
岳鹏鹏, 卢学峰, 叶润蓉, 周玉碧, 杨仕兵, 张长现, 彭敏. 江河源不同区域紫花针茅草原群落特征. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5): 1116-1125. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.016
YUE Peng-Peng, LU Xue-Feng, YE Run-Rong, ZHOU Yu-Bi, YANG Shi-Bing, ZHANG Chang- Xian, PENG Min. COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS OF STIPA PURPUREASTEPPE IN SOURCE REGIONS OF CHANGJIANG AND HUANGHE RIVERS, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(5): 1116-1125. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.016
项目 Items | 样地1 Sampling plot 1 | 样地2 Sampling plot 2 | 样地3 Sampling plot 3 |
---|---|---|---|
行政区域 Location | 玛多 Maduo | 曲麻莱 Qumalai | 同德 Tongde |
样线号 Sampling line No. | s1~s11 | s12~s22 | s23~s33 |
海拔 Altitude (m) | 4 210~4 355 | 4 290~4 567 | 3 343~3 555 |
经度 Longitude | 97°40'57.7" N~ 98°19'42.3" N | 95°50'40.5" N~ 95°53'39.8" N | 100°54'20.4" N~ 101°13'32.7" N |
纬度 Latitude | 34°50'7.2" E~ 35°06'39.6" E | 34°07'39.8" E~ 34°08'54.6" E | 35°15'56.4" E~ 35°18'17.5" E |
气温≥5 ℃积温 (℃) Accumulate temperature≥5 ℃ | 678.2 | 902.3 | 1 662 |
年降水量 (mm) Average annual precipitation | 311.0 | 429.4 | 902.3 |
土壤类型 Soil type | 高山草甸土 Alpine meadow soil | 高山草甸土、高山草原土 Alpine meadow soil, alpine steppe soil | 栗钙土 Chestnut soil |
表1 调查样地基本情况
Table 1 General conditions of sampling plots
项目 Items | 样地1 Sampling plot 1 | 样地2 Sampling plot 2 | 样地3 Sampling plot 3 |
---|---|---|---|
行政区域 Location | 玛多 Maduo | 曲麻莱 Qumalai | 同德 Tongde |
样线号 Sampling line No. | s1~s11 | s12~s22 | s23~s33 |
海拔 Altitude (m) | 4 210~4 355 | 4 290~4 567 | 3 343~3 555 |
经度 Longitude | 97°40'57.7" N~ 98°19'42.3" N | 95°50'40.5" N~ 95°53'39.8" N | 100°54'20.4" N~ 101°13'32.7" N |
纬度 Latitude | 34°50'7.2" E~ 35°06'39.6" E | 34°07'39.8" E~ 34°08'54.6" E | 35°15'56.4" E~ 35°18'17.5" E |
气温≥5 ℃积温 (℃) Accumulate temperature≥5 ℃ | 678.2 | 902.3 | 1 662 |
年降水量 (mm) Average annual precipitation | 311.0 | 429.4 | 902.3 |
土壤类型 Soil type | 高山草甸土 Alpine meadow soil | 高山草甸土、高山草原土 Alpine meadow soil, alpine steppe soil | 栗钙土 Chestnut soil |
科 Family | 种数 No. of species | 占总种数的百分比 Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|
菊科 Compositae | 19 | 19.79 |
禾本科 Gramineae | 16 | 16.67 |
豆科 Leguminosae | 11 | 11.46 |
莎草科 Cyperaceae | 9 | 9.38 |
玄参科 Scrophulariaceae | 5 | 5.21 |
藜科 Chenopodiaceae | 4 | 4.17 |
龙胆科 Gentianaceae | 4 | 4.17 |
毛莨科 Ranunculaceae | 4 | 4.17 |
蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 4 | 4.17 |
其它14科 Other 14 families | 29 | 20.83 |
表2 紫花针茅草原群落种子植物组成情况
Table 2 The composition of seed plants in Stipa purpurea steppe community
科 Family | 种数 No. of species | 占总种数的百分比 Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|
菊科 Compositae | 19 | 19.79 |
禾本科 Gramineae | 16 | 16.67 |
豆科 Leguminosae | 11 | 11.46 |
莎草科 Cyperaceae | 9 | 9.38 |
玄参科 Scrophulariaceae | 5 | 5.21 |
藜科 Chenopodiaceae | 4 | 4.17 |
龙胆科 Gentianaceae | 4 | 4.17 |
毛莨科 Ranunculaceae | 4 | 4.17 |
蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 4 | 4.17 |
其它14科 Other 14 families | 29 | 20.83 |
分布区类型 Areal-types | 属数 No. of genera | 占总属的百分比 Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|
北温带分布 North temperate | 28 | 48.28 |
世界分布 Cosmopolitan | 9 | 15.52 |
旧世界温带分布 Old world temperate | 5 | 9.62 |
温带亚洲分布 Temperate of Asia | 5 | 8.62 |
东亚分布 East Asia | 5 | 8.62 |
地中海区、西亚至中亚分布 Mediterranea, West Asia to Central Asia | 2 | 3.45 |
中国特有 Endemic to China | 2 | 3.45 |
中亚分布 Central Asia | 1 | 1.72 |
泛热带分布 Pantropic | 1 | 1.72 |
合计 Total | 58 | 100.0 |
表3 紫花针茅草原群落种子植物属的分布区类型
Table 3 The generic areal-types of seed plants in Stipa purpurea steppe community
分布区类型 Areal-types | 属数 No. of genera | 占总属的百分比 Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|
北温带分布 North temperate | 28 | 48.28 |
世界分布 Cosmopolitan | 9 | 15.52 |
旧世界温带分布 Old world temperate | 5 | 9.62 |
温带亚洲分布 Temperate of Asia | 5 | 8.62 |
东亚分布 East Asia | 5 | 8.62 |
地中海区、西亚至中亚分布 Mediterranea, West Asia to Central Asia | 2 | 3.45 |
中国特有 Endemic to China | 2 | 3.45 |
中亚分布 Central Asia | 1 | 1.72 |
泛热带分布 Pantropic | 1 | 1.72 |
合计 Total | 58 | 100.0 |
种名 Plant name | 群落Ⅰ Association Ⅰ | 群落Ⅱ AssociationⅡ | 群落Ⅲ Association Ⅲ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均重要值Average important value | 平均盖度 Average coverage | 平均重要值Average important value | 平均盖度 Average coverage | 平均重要值Average important value | 平均盖度 Average coverage | |
紫花针茅 Stipa purpurea | 39.26 | 53.80 | 26.41 | 42.91 | 31.33 | 56.29 |
川青早熟禾 Poa indattenuata | 5.29 | 1.43 | 5.99 | 3.69 | 7.81 | 8.57 |
二裂委陵菜 Potentilla bifurca | 6.68 | 3.11 | 6.44 | 4.48 | 5.26 | 3.76 |
伊凡苔草 Carex ivanovae | 4.42 | 2.50 | 5.99 | 3.81 | 5.06 | 3.15 |
高山嵩草 Kobresia parva | 0.05 | 0.02 | 11.77 | 14.38 | 1.31 | 2.26 |
弱小火绒草 Leontopodium humilum | 5.89 | 4.14 | 5.08 | 3.52 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
茵垫黄芪 Astragalus mattam | 3.81 | 1.28 | 5.96 | 3.52 | 0 | 0 |
小花细柄茅 Ptilagrostis dichotomavar.roshevitsiana | 0 | 0 | 7.46 | 7.89 | 0.42 | 0.31 |
沙生风毛菊 Saussurea arenaria | 3.32 | 1.896 | 3.52 | 2.26 | 0 | 0 |
芒 草 Koleria litvinowii | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.37 | 7.09 |
表4 紫花针茅草原群落主要种重要值和盖度的变化
Table 4 Changes of relative coverage and important value of the dominant species of Stipa purpurea steppe community
种名 Plant name | 群落Ⅰ Association Ⅰ | 群落Ⅱ AssociationⅡ | 群落Ⅲ Association Ⅲ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均重要值Average important value | 平均盖度 Average coverage | 平均重要值Average important value | 平均盖度 Average coverage | 平均重要值Average important value | 平均盖度 Average coverage | |
紫花针茅 Stipa purpurea | 39.26 | 53.80 | 26.41 | 42.91 | 31.33 | 56.29 |
川青早熟禾 Poa indattenuata | 5.29 | 1.43 | 5.99 | 3.69 | 7.81 | 8.57 |
二裂委陵菜 Potentilla bifurca | 6.68 | 3.11 | 6.44 | 4.48 | 5.26 | 3.76 |
伊凡苔草 Carex ivanovae | 4.42 | 2.50 | 5.99 | 3.81 | 5.06 | 3.15 |
高山嵩草 Kobresia parva | 0.05 | 0.02 | 11.77 | 14.38 | 1.31 | 2.26 |
弱小火绒草 Leontopodium humilum | 5.89 | 4.14 | 5.08 | 3.52 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
茵垫黄芪 Astragalus mattam | 3.81 | 1.28 | 5.96 | 3.52 | 0 | 0 |
小花细柄茅 Ptilagrostis dichotomavar.roshevitsiana | 0 | 0 | 7.46 | 7.89 | 0.42 | 0.31 |
沙生风毛菊 Saussurea arenaria | 3.32 | 1.896 | 3.52 | 2.26 | 0 | 0 |
芒 草 Koleria litvinowii | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.37 | 7.09 |
群落 Association | Sorensen相似性系数 Coefficient of Sorensen | Jaccard相似性系数 Coefficient of Jaccard | 共有种 Common species |
---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ~Ⅱ | 0.562 5 | 0.391 3 | 27 |
Ⅱ~Ⅲ | 0.377 8 | 0.232 9 | 17 |
Ⅰ~Ⅲ | 0.377 4 | 0.232 6 | 20 |
表5 群落共有种和群落相似系数
Table 5 Common species and coefficient of community similarity
群落 Association | Sorensen相似性系数 Coefficient of Sorensen | Jaccard相似性系数 Coefficient of Jaccard | 共有种 Common species |
---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ~Ⅱ | 0.562 5 | 0.391 3 | 27 |
Ⅱ~Ⅲ | 0.377 8 | 0.232 9 | 17 |
Ⅰ~Ⅲ | 0.377 4 | 0.232 6 | 20 |
群落序列号 Association No. | 样线号 Sampling line No. | 物种丰富度R Richness index | 均匀度指数E Evenness index | Shannon-Wener指数H′ Shannon-Wener index | Simpson指数D Simpson index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | s1~s11 | 12~26 | 0.764 | 2.190 | 0.808 |
Ⅱ | s12~s22 | 15~21 | 0.845 | 2.446 | 0.878 |
Ⅲ | s 23~s33 | 15~27 | 0.804 | 2.337 | 0.849 |
表6 各群落α多样性指数平均值
Table 6 The α diversity indexes of the 3 associations
群落序列号 Association No. | 样线号 Sampling line No. | 物种丰富度R Richness index | 均匀度指数E Evenness index | Shannon-Wener指数H′ Shannon-Wener index | Simpson指数D Simpson index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | s1~s11 | 12~26 | 0.764 | 2.190 | 0.808 |
Ⅱ | s12~s22 | 15~21 | 0.845 | 2.446 | 0.878 |
Ⅲ | s 23~s33 | 15~27 | 0.804 | 2.337 | 0.849 |
项目 Items | 物种丰富度R Richness index | 均匀度指数E Evenness index | Shannon-Wener 指数H′ Shannon-Wener index | Simpson 指数D Simpson index |
---|---|---|---|---|
物种丰富度R richness index | 1 | |||
均匀度指数E evenness index | -0.247 | 1 | ||
Shannon-Wener指数H′ Shannon- Wener index | 0.601** | 0.612** | 1 | |
Simpson指数D Simpson index | 0.173 | 0.854** | 0.849** | 1 |
海拔 Altitude | -0.10 | -0.004 | 0.003 | -0.053 |
纬度 Latitude | 0.54 | -0.467** | -0.350* | -0.384* |
经度 Longitude | 0.69 | -0.283 | -0.194 | -0.212 |
表7 α多样性指数间以及它们和海拔、经纬度间的相关分析
Table 7 The correlation analysis among α diversity indexes, altitude, latitude and longitude
项目 Items | 物种丰富度R Richness index | 均匀度指数E Evenness index | Shannon-Wener 指数H′ Shannon-Wener index | Simpson 指数D Simpson index |
---|---|---|---|---|
物种丰富度R richness index | 1 | |||
均匀度指数E evenness index | -0.247 | 1 | ||
Shannon-Wener指数H′ Shannon- Wener index | 0.601** | 0.612** | 1 | |
Simpson指数D Simpson index | 0.173 | 0.854** | 0.849** | 1 |
海拔 Altitude | -0.10 | -0.004 | 0.003 | -0.053 |
纬度 Latitude | 0.54 | -0.467** | -0.350* | -0.384* |
经度 Longitude | 0.69 | -0.283 | -0.194 | -0.212 |
[1] |
Collins SL, Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM, Sterinauer EM (1998). Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie. Science, 280,745-747.
DOI URL PMID |
[2] | Guo K (郭柯) (1993). Vegetation of Qinghai Hoh Xil Region. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学学报), 17,120-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Hoopor DU, Vitousek PM (1997). The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science, 277,1302-1305. |
[4] | Hoopor DU, Vitousek PM (1998). Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecological Monographs, 68,121-149. |
[5] | Kang MY (康慕谊) (1993). Preliminary study on ecological species groups in Xunhe River basin, south face of Qingling Mountain. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobota- nica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学学报), 17,9-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Kuramato RT, Bliss LC (1970). Ecology of subalpine meadows in the Olympic mountain, Washingtion. Eco1ogical Monographs, 40,317-347. |
[7] | Li KH (李凯辉), Hu YK (胡玉昆), Adeli M (阿德力·麦地), Yu JM (于建梅), Wu Q (武强) (2005). Research advances of diversity in grassland communities. Arid Zone Research (干旱区研究), 22,581-586. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Liu SW (刘尚武) (1999). Flora of Qinghai(青海植物志). Qinghai People’s Publishing House, Xining, 4,149-150. (in Chinese) |
[9] | Ma KP (马克平) (1994). The measurement of community diversity. In: Qian YQ (钱迎倩), Ma KP (马克平) eds. Principles and Methodologies of Biodiversity Studies (生物多样性研究的原理与方法). Chinese Science and Technology Press, Beijing, 141-165. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Ma KP (马克平), Liu YM (刘玉明) (1994). Measurement of biotic community diversity. Ⅰ. α diversity (Part Ⅱ). Chinese Biodiversity (生物多样性), 2,231-239. (in Chinese) |
[11] | Ma SZ (马世震), Peng M (彭敏), Chen GC (陈桂琛), Zhou GY (周国英), Sun Q (孙箐) (2004). Feature analysis of vegetation degradation on Alpine Grassland in Yellow River source region. Pratacultural Science (草业科学), 21(10),19-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Magurran AE (1988). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press,New Jersey. |
[13] | Peet RK (1974). The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5,285-305. |
[14] | Pielou EC (1975). Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 16-51. |
[15] | Qiu B (邱波), Ren QJ (任青吉), Luo YJ (罗燕江), Du GZ (杜国祯) (2004). Study on α diversity and β diversity of plant community of different habitats in alpine meadow. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 24,655-661. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Sorensen T (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant society based on similarity of species content and its application to analysis of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter, 5,1-34. |
[17] | Sun J (孙菁), Peng M (彭敏), Chen GC (陈桂琛), Wang SZ (王顺忠), Zhou GY (周国英) (2003). Study on community characteristics and community diversity in Stipa steppe of Qinghai Lake region. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 23,1963-1968. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Tilman D (1996). Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology, 77,350-363. |
[19] | Tilman D, Downing JA (1994). Biodiversity and stability in grassland. Nature, 367,363-365. |
[20] | Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemano E (1997a). The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science, 277,1300-1302. |
[21] |
Tilman D, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997b). Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94,1857-1861.
DOI URL PMID |
[22] | Wang JT (王金亭), Li BS (李渤生) (1982). Main types and characteristics of high-cold steppe in the Qiangtang Plateau of Xizang. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobota- nica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学丛刊), 6,1-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Wang XL (王小利), Zhang L (张力), Zhang DG (张德罡), Gan YM (干友民), Xu GP (徐广平), Yang YH (杨予海), Miao XL (苗小林), Zhou XH (周学辉), Deng CH (邓春辉), Guan Que ZX (官却扎西) (2006a). Study on comparison of underground phytomass of Stipa purpurea steppe under moderate and heavy degradatio. Grassland and Turf (草原与草坪), (4),15-20, 24. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Wang XL (王小利), Gan YM (干友民), Zhang L (张力), Yang YH (杨予海) (2006b). Study on the conversion efficiency for solar radiation energy of heavy and moderate degraded grassland of Stipa purpurea in Qinghai Lake area. Pruataculture & Animal Husbandry (草业与畜牧), 11,1-4, 11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Wedin DA, Tilman D (1999). Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on the carbon balance of grasslands. Science, 284,1720-1724. |
[26] | Wu ZY (吴征镒) (1991). The areal-types of Chinese genera of seed plants. Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), (Suppl. IV), 1-139. (in Chinese) |
[27] |
Yachi S, Loreau M (1999). Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96,1463-1468.
URL PMID |
[28] | Zhang JT (张金屯) (1995). Methods in Quantitative Vegetation Ecology(植被数量生态学方法). China Science and Technology Press, Beijing, 312-313. (in Chinese) |
[29] | Zheng D (郑度), Zhang RZ (张荣祖), Yang QY (杨勤业) (1979). On the natural zone in the Qinghai Xizang Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 34,1-11.. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[30] | Zhou XM (周兴民), Wang ZB (王质彬), Du Q (杜庆) (1987). Vegetation of Qinghai (青海植被). Qinghai People Press, Xining, 66-68. (in Chinese) |
[31] | Zhu JM (朱锦懋), Jiang ZL (姜志林), Zheng QR (郑群瑞), Jiang W (蒋伟) (1997). Species diversity in the forest community of Wanmulin Nature Reserve, Fujian Province. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 16(2),1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 李冰, 朱湾湾, 韩翠, 余海龙, 黄菊莹. 降水量变化下荒漠草原土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1310-1321. |
[2] | 于笑, 纪若璇, 任天梦, 夏新莉, 尹伟伦, 刘超. 中国北方蒙古莸群落的分布、特征和分类[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1182-1192. |
[3] | 刘秋蓉, 李丽, 罗垚, 陈冬东, 黄鑫, 胡君, 刘庆. 四川巴塘海子山高寒灌丛群落的基本特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1334-1341. |
[4] | 要振宇, 史亚博, 马文红, 赵利清, 菊花, 浩仁塔本, 苏闯, 张芯毓, 梁存柱. 内蒙古地区虎榛子群系的群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1342-1349. |
[5] | 黄杰, 李晓玲, 王雪松, 杨进, 黄成名. 三峡库区不同消落带下中华蚊母树群落特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 844-859. |
[6] | 钏会艳, 贾东瑞, 浦江, 张翠萍, 李淑英, 周元清. 云南新平铁坚油杉森林群落结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(2): 207-212. |
[7] | 李紫晶, 莎娜, 史亚博, 佟旭泽, 董雷, 张小青, 孙蔷, 梁存柱. 内蒙古西鄂尔多斯地区半日花荒漠群落特征及其分类[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 806-816. |
[8] | 王明明,刘新平,何玉惠,张铜会,魏静,车力木格,孙姗姗. 科尔沁沙地封育恢复过程中植物群落特征变化及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(8): 672-684. |
[9] | 朱媛君, 乔鲜果, 郭柯, 旭日, 赵利清. 中国戈壁针茅草原的分布、群落特征和分类[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 785-792. |
[10] | 苏闯, 马文红, 张芯毓, 苏云, 闵永恩, 张晋元, 赵利清, 梁存柱. 贺兰山西坡主要山地灌丛群落的基本特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 1050-1054. |
[11] | 杨瑶, 郭柯, 赵利清, 赵海卫, 乔鲜果, 刘慧明, 刘长成. 西藏昆仑针茅草原的基本特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6): 635-639. |
[12] | 宁世江, 赵天林, 唐润琴, 李瑞棠, 覃文更, 谭卫宁. 木论林区单性木兰群落特征的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(199901): 194-204. |
[13] | 贺达汉, 长有德, 杨云飞, 杨顺堂, 李玉平. 沙坡头人工固沙草地生态演替中植物群落特征参数和种群消长模型的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(199901): 39-46. |
[14] | 谢宗强, 陈伟烈. 濒危植物银杉的群落及其演替趋势[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(1): 48-55. |
[15] | 王庆锁, 董学军, 陈旭东, 杨宝珍. 油蒿群落不同演替阶段某些群落特征的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1997, 21(6): 531-538. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19