植物生态学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1126-1133.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.017 cstr: 32100.14.j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.017
收稿日期:2008-02-18
接受日期:2008-05-13
出版日期:2008-02-18
发布日期:2008-09-30
作者简介:*(yinlk@ms.xjb.ac.cn)基金资助:
CHEN Yan-Rui1,2,3, YIN Lin-Ke2,*(
)
Received:2008-02-18
Accepted:2008-05-13
Online:2008-02-18
Published:2008-09-30
摘要:
以塔里木河下游绿洲外围大型防风固沙林为研究对象, 采用基于Simpson多样性指数的生态位宽度公式和Pianka生态位重叠测度公式, 在群落梯度上按重要值大小筛选出优势种群进行生态位分析, 探讨这些群落在4~7年的发育过程中生态位变化特点。结果表明: 1)经过4年的发育, 植物种组成简单的人工防风固沙林由于乡土植物种的侵入, 演变成为人工-天然植物群落, 不同地段群落中的优势种群发生了较大的变化, 优势种群共7个。芦苇(Phragmites communis)、花花柴(Karelinia caspica)和盐生草(Halogeton glomeratus)这3个乡土植物种侵入后逐渐成为优势种群, 而原人工群落主要建群种宁夏枸杞(Lycium barbarum)种群逐渐消退; 7年后, 优势种群共6个。由于水分条件的变化, 多枝柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima)成为优势种群, 而芦苇降为亚优势种群, 盐生草种群发生消退; 2)人工-天然植物群落中优势种群以耐旱耐盐碱植物占主要优势向占绝对优势的方向发展, 其生态位宽度变化幅度为0.56~0.86, 生态位宽度排序为芦苇>花花柴>头状沙拐枣(Calligonum caput-medusae)>沙枣(Elaeagnus angustifolia)>胡杨(Populus euphratica)>多枝柽柳>梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron)>盐生草; 3)生态位重叠最大值发生在头状沙拐枣和胡杨种群之间; 4)在乡土植物种向人工群落侵入的过程中, 生态位宽度较大(或较小)的种群, 它们所构成的种对间生态位重叠既有较大的, 也有较小的, 可见生态位宽度与生态位重叠程度无相关性; 表明在现阶段群落演变中, 植物对环境资源存在着激烈的竞争和高的空间异质性。
陈艳瑞, 尹林克. 人工防风固沙林演替中群落组成和优势种群生态位变化特征. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5): 1126-1133. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.017
CHEN Yan-Rui, YIN Lin-Ke. COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND NICHE CHANGE CHARACTERISTICS OF DOMINANT SPECIES IN THE WIND-BREAKING AND SAND-FIXING FOREST, XINJIANG, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(5): 1126-1133. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.017
| 序号 No. | C9~C17 (2004) | C18~C26 (2007) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 | C13 | C14 | C15 | C16 | C17 | C18 | C19 | C20 | C21 | C22 | C23 | C24 | C25 | C26 | ||
| 1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
| 2 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||
| 3 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 4 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||
| 5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
| 6 | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
| 7 | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| 8 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
| 9 | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||
| 10 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||
| 11 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
| 12 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 13 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 14 | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||
| 15 | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||
| 16 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
| 17 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
| 18 | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| 19 | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||
| 20 | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||
| 21 | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||
| 22 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| 23 | + | + | |||||||||||||||||
| 24 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| 25 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| 26 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| 27 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| TL | 12 | 22 | 10 | 19 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 10 | |
表1 2004年和2007年各人工-天然植物群落的植物种类组成
Table 1 Species composition of each artificial-natural plant community in 2004 and 2007
| 序号 No. | C9~C17 (2004) | C18~C26 (2007) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C9 | C10 | C11 | C12 | C13 | C14 | C15 | C16 | C17 | C18 | C19 | C20 | C21 | C22 | C23 | C24 | C25 | C26 | ||
| 1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
| 2 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||
| 3 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 4 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||
| 5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
| 6 | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
| 7 | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| 8 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
| 9 | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||
| 10 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||
| 11 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||
| 12 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 13 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| 14 | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||
| 15 | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||
| 16 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
| 17 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
| 18 | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| 19 | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||
| 20 | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||
| 21 | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||
| 22 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| 23 | + | + | |||||||||||||||||
| 24 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| 25 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| 26 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| 27 | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| TL | 12 | 22 | 10 | 19 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 10 | |
图2 各人工-天然群落中主要植物种的重要值 H.a:Haloxyon ammodendron E.a: Elaeagnus angustifolia C.c: Calligonum caput-medusae T.r: Tamarix ramosissima P.e: Populus euphratica K.c: Karelinia caspica P.c: Phragmites communis H.g: Halogeton glomeratus 4: Four years 7: Seven years C9、C10、C11、C12、C13、C14、C15、C16和C17: 同表1 See Table 1
Fig. 2 Species important value of each artificial-natural plant community
| 年份 Year 优势种群 Dominant species | 2000年 In 2000 | 2004年 In 2004 | 2007年 In 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 梭梭 Haloxylon ammodendron | + | + | |
| 2 沙枣 Elaeagnus angustifolia | + | + | + |
| 3 头状沙拐枣 Calligonum caput-medusae | + | + | + |
| 4 胡杨 Populus euphratica | + | + | + |
| 5 花花柴 Karelinia caspica | + | + | |
| 6 芦苇 Phragmites communis | + | ||
| 7 盐生草 Halogeton glomeratus | + | ||
| 8 多枝柽柳 Tamarix ramosissima | + |
表2 群落不同发展阶段优势种群变化
Table 2 The dominant species of community in different stages
| 年份 Year 优势种群 Dominant species | 2000年 In 2000 | 2004年 In 2004 | 2007年 In 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 梭梭 Haloxylon ammodendron | + | + | |
| 2 沙枣 Elaeagnus angustifolia | + | + | + |
| 3 头状沙拐枣 Calligonum caput-medusae | + | + | + |
| 4 胡杨 Populus euphratica | + | + | + |
| 5 花花柴 Karelinia caspica | + | + | |
| 6 芦苇 Phragmites communis | + | ||
| 7 盐生草 Halogeton glomeratus | + | ||
| 8 多枝柽柳 Tamarix ramosissima | + |
| 序号 No. | Bsi(4) | Bsi (7) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.694 6 | 0.590 4 |
| 2 | 0.719 0 | 0.825 1 |
| 3 | 0.786 1 | 0.849 6 |
| 4 | 0.698 9 | 0.821 3 |
| 5 | 0.843 3 | 0.854 5 |
| 6 | 0.859 6 | / |
| 7 | 0.556 5 | / |
| 8 | / | 0.692 6 |
表3 优势种群的生态位宽度
Table 3 The niche breadths of dominant species
| 序号 No. | Bsi(4) | Bsi (7) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.694 6 | 0.590 4 |
| 2 | 0.719 0 | 0.825 1 |
| 3 | 0.786 1 | 0.849 6 |
| 4 | 0.698 9 | 0.821 3 |
| 5 | 0.843 3 | 0.854 5 |
| 6 | 0.859 6 | / |
| 7 | 0.556 5 | / |
| 8 | / | 0.692 6 |
| 序号 No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.000 0 | 0.165 3 | 0.279 4 | 0.151 7 | 0.763 3 | 0.371 9 | 0.447 8 |
| 2 | 0.351 3 | 1.000 0 | 0.372 8 | 0.083 7 | 0.527 1 | 0.640 3 | 0.053 7 |
| 3 | 0.359 6 | 0.527 2 | 1.000 0 | 0.856 0 | 0.341 2 | 0.560 7 | 0.163 0 |
| 4 | 0.357 3 | 0.585 4 | 0.810 2 | 1.000 0 | 0.157 9 | 0.599 7 | 0.050 4 |
| 5 | 0.373 4 | 0.758 1 | 0.608 8 | 0.503 6 | 1.000 0 | 0.680 0 | 0.680 6 |
| 8 | 0.257 9 | 0.214 6 | 0.476 9 | 0.152 0 | 0.705 6 | / | / |
表4 优势种群的相对生态位重叠值
Table 4 The relative niche overlap value of dominant species
| 序号 No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.000 0 | 0.165 3 | 0.279 4 | 0.151 7 | 0.763 3 | 0.371 9 | 0.447 8 |
| 2 | 0.351 3 | 1.000 0 | 0.372 8 | 0.083 7 | 0.527 1 | 0.640 3 | 0.053 7 |
| 3 | 0.359 6 | 0.527 2 | 1.000 0 | 0.856 0 | 0.341 2 | 0.560 7 | 0.163 0 |
| 4 | 0.357 3 | 0.585 4 | 0.810 2 | 1.000 0 | 0.157 9 | 0.599 7 | 0.050 4 |
| 5 | 0.373 4 | 0.758 1 | 0.608 8 | 0.503 6 | 1.000 0 | 0.680 0 | 0.680 6 |
| 8 | 0.257 9 | 0.214 6 | 0.476 9 | 0.152 0 | 0.705 6 | / | / |
| [1] | Chen B (陈波), Zhou XM (周兴民) (1995). Analyses of niche breadths and overlaps of several plant species in three Kobresia communities of an alpine meadow. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 19,158-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [2] | Chen YR, Yin LK, Yan C, Wang LT (2006). Exploring communities stability and niche characteristics of dominant species of artificial plant communities in inland river area in desert. Proceedings of the China Association for Science and Technology, 2,450-454. |
| [3] | Dong M (董鸣), Wang FF (王义风), Kong FZ (孔敏志) (1996). Survey, observation and analysis of terrestrial biocommunities(陆地生物群落调查观测与分析). Standards Press of China, Beijing,3-18. (in Chinese) |
| [4] | Ge F (戈峰) (2000). Modern Ecology (现代生态学). Science Press, Beijing, 263. (in Chinese) |
| [5] | Guo QB (郭全邦), Liu YC (刘玉成), Li XG (李旭光) (1997). The niche of dominant populations in forest secondary sere in Mt. Jinyun. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition) (西南师范大学学报)(自然科学版), 22,73-78. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [6] | Li JW (李景文) (1981). Forest Ecology(森林生态学). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, 209. (in Chinese) |
| [7] | Li R (李瑞), Zhang KB (张克斌), Yang XH (杨晓晖), Yang JJ (杨俊杰), Qiao F (乔峰) (2006). The studies on vegetative niche of prohibited grassland in desertification region—Taking Yanchi county, Ningxia Hui autonomous as an example. Research of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持研究), 13,213-216, 252. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [8] | Lu Q (卢琦), Li XR (李新荣), Xiao HL (肖洪浪) (2003). Desert Ecosystem Observation Methods (荒漠生态系统观测方法). China Environmental Science Press, Beijing,66-92. (in Chinese) |
| [9] | MacArthur RH (1955). Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology, 36,533-536. |
| [10] | Silvertown JW (1983). Plants in limestone pavements: tests of species interaction and niche separation. Journal of Ecology, 71,819-828. |
| [11] | Song YC (宋永昌) (2001). Vegetation Ecology (植被生态学). East China Normal University Press, Shanghai,551-552,310-312. (in Chinese) |
| [12] | Walker B (1995). Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conservation Biology, 9,747-752. |
| [13] | Wang G (王刚), Zhao SL (赵松岭), Zhang PY (张鹏云), Chen QC (陈庆诚) (1984). The niche definition discussion and the research on the improved overlapping formula of niche. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 4,119-127. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [14] | Yin LK (尹林克), Li T (李涛) (2005). Association analysis on natural plant communities in the middle and lower reaches of Tarim River. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29,226-234. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [15] | Yin LK (尹林克), Wang LT (王雷涛) (2005). Selection of plant species in artificial vegetation reconstruction in inland river area in desert—A case analysis on the middle and lower reaches of Tarim River. Journal of Arid Land Resources & Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 19,162-165. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [16] | Zhang LJ (张林静), Yue M (岳明), Zhao GF (赵桂仿), Zhang YD (张远东), Gu FX (顾峰雪), Pan XL (潘晓玲) (2002). Comparison of different measurements applied to Oasis-Desert Ecotone. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 21,71-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 赵珮杉, 高广磊, 丁国栋, 张英. 林龄和生态位对樟子松人工林地下真菌群落构建的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1472-1484. |
| [2] | 李冬梅, 孙龙, 韩宇, 胡同欣, 杨光, 蔡慧颖. 计划火烧对红松人工林生物多样性与生态系统多功能性关系的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 379-392. |
| [3] | 刘洋, 刘傲, 宋璇紫, 杨云, 安柏衡, 韩梦姣, 班玛才格尔, 米玛旺堆. 高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草甸主要植物生态位及种间联结的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 2054-2068. |
| [4] | 郑立媛, 徐茜竹, 尹嘉淇, 孙小雯, 王艳. 城郊近河退耕地野大豆群落生态位和种间联结[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1685-1697. |
| [5] | 周红娟, 刘子赫, 刘柯言, 张初蕊, 胡旭, 韩璐, 陈立欣. 不同降雨条件下北京土石山区混生乔灌植物的水分吸收和生态位特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1089-1103. |
| [6] | 冉松松, 余再鹏, 万晓华, 傅彦榕, 邹秉章, 王思荣, 黄志群. 邻域树种多样性对杉木叶片氮磷生态化学计量比的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 932-942. |
| [7] | 祝维, 周欧, 孙一鸣, 古丽米热·依力哈木, 王亚飞, 杨红青, 贾黎明, 席本野. 混交林内毛白杨和刺槐根系吸水的动态生态位划分[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 389-403. |
| [8] | 何春梅, 李雨姗, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 郝占庆. 秦岭皇冠暖温性落叶阔叶林优势树种的径级结构和数量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1658-1667. |
| [9] | 杨玲, 梁思琪, 潘佳明, 韦金鑫, 丁涛, 蒋日红, 邵毅贞, 张宪春, 刘勇波, 向巧萍. 濒危植物百山祖冷杉和资源冷杉的物种划分及其遗传资源的保护[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1629-1645. |
| [10] | 李杰, 郝珉辉, 范春雨, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 东北温带森林树种和功能多样性对生态系统多功能性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1507-1522. |
| [11] | 叶洁泓, 于成龙, 卓少菲, 陈新兰, 杨科明, 文印, 刘慧. 木兰科植物叶片光合系统耐热性与叶片形态及温度生态位的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1432-1440. |
| [12] | 张零念, 朱贵青, 杨宽, 刘星月, 巩合德, 郑丽. 滇中云南杨梅灌丛主要木本植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1400-1410. |
| [13] | 王春成, 张云玲, 马松梅, 黄刚, 张丹, 闫涵. 中国扁桃亚属四种野生扁桃的系统发育与物种分化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 987-995. |
| [14] | 闫涵, 张云玲, 马松梅, 王春成, 张丹. 黑果枸杞在新疆的适宜分布模拟与局部环境适应性分化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(11): 1221-1230. |
| [15] | 蔚亮, 李均力, 包安明, 白洁, 黄粤, 刘铁, 沈占锋. 塔里木河下游湿地面积时序变化及对生态输水的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 616-627. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19