莱州海涂海水灌溉下菊芋生理生态特性研究

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2005.0063

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在山东莱州对菊芋 (Helianthustuberosus) 进行了海水灌溉浓度及其灌溉次数的田间试验, 结果表明 :1) 灌溉1次的处理中, 全淡水同海淡水比例为 1∶9、1∶4、1∶3的 3种处理的菊芋块茎产量 (鲜重 ) 没有显著差异 ;菊芋生长中灌溉 2次, 以海淡水比例为 1∶3处理的菊芋块茎产量最高, 但各处理间菊芋块茎产量差异没有达到显著水平 ;无论何种比例海淡水灌溉, 在莱州湾, 灌溉两次菊芋块茎产量显著高于灌溉 1次 ;2 ) 灌溉处理后连续 5天内, 菊芋光合速率与土壤表层盐分动态变化趋势一致 :第一、二天, 1∶9比例海淡水灌溉菊芋光合速率显著高于其它处理, 而1∶4、1∶3比例海淡水处理在前二、三天光合速率同全淡水灌溉处理基本没有差异, 第五天时, 海淡水比例为 1∶3的处理, 菊芋光合速率显著低于其它处理 ;在灌溉后盐分变化达到平稳的较长时间内, 土壤水分含量成为影响菊芋光合速率的主导因子, 1∶3处理因土壤表层土壤水吸力较低而菊芋光合速率显著高于其它处理 ;3) 第一次灌溉 6 0d后, 以全淡水灌溉处理菊芋的叶面积指数显著高于其它处理, 1∶3处理显著低于其它处理, 1∶9、1∶4两处理间没有差异。

关键词: 生理生态, 海水灌溉, 菊芋, 莱州海涂

Abstract:

Salt stress to plants results from both osmotic stress, due to low water potentials, and direct salt-ion injury. Salt-tolerant mechanisms of plants are mainly ion compartmentalization, osmoregulation and metabolic changes. In the past, Sigle-salt experiments were usually conducted to study salt-tolerance in plants; however, experimental results were often contradicted to field observations. To better simulate actual field conditions, we conducted a laboratory experiment to study the physiological characteristics of salt-tolerance in Helianthus tuberosus using natural seawater. Potted plants of H. tuberosus were irrigated with seawater taken from the Laizhou coast, Shandong Province, China in 2000, and diluted with freshwater at the following ratios: 0∶1 (Pure freshwater), 1∶9, 1∶4 and 1∶3. The results showed that at the end of the growing period, the yield of fresh tuber in all treatments was the same following one irrigation treatment period. However, following two irrigation treatment periods, the tuber yield in the 1∶3 treatment was much higher than in the other treatments whereas the other treatments were similar. When H. tuberosus was treated with two irrigation treatment periods, the tuber yield was greater in all saltwater treatments than in the single irrigation treatment. The photosynthetic rate of H. tuberosus was consistent with changes in the salt concentration of the surface soil. On the first or second day after irrigation, the photosynthetic rate of H. tuberosus in the controls was much higher than other treatments while there was nearly no difference in rates among treatments except for the 1∶3 treatment that had lower photosynthetic rate. After sixty days of irrigation, the greatest leaf area index (LAI) was achieved in plants irrigated with pure freshwater, LAI was the lowest in plants in the most saline treatment (1∶3 seawater:freshwater), and similar in the other two treatments.

Key words: Physiological characteristics, Seawater irrigation, Helianthus tuberosus, Salt-tolerance

刘兆普, 邓力群, 刘玲, 綦长海, 陈铭达, 夏天翔. 莱州海涂海水灌溉下菊芋生理生态特性研究. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(3): 474-478. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0063

IU Zhao-Pu, DENG Li-Qun, LIU Ling, QI Chang-Hai, CHEN Ming-Da, XIA Tian-Xiang. PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS IRRIGATED BY SEAWATER, LAIZHOU COAST, SHANDONG PROVINCE. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(3): 474-478. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0063

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2005.0063

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2005/V29/I3/474

图/表 8

参考文献 10

[1]	Li YZ (李韵珠), Li BG (李保国) (1998). SoilSolutesTrans portation (土壤溶质运移). SciencePress, Beijing,90. (inChinese).
[2]	Liu GS (刘公社), Alain B, Peng KJ (彭克敬) (1994). Re searchandDevelopmentoftheSunflower (向日葵研究与开发). ChineseScienceandTechnologyPress, Beijing,23. (inChi nese).
[3]	Liu L (刘联), Liu L (刘玲), Liu ZP (刘兆普) (2003). StudyonAloeveraL.irrigatedbyseawaterinthesea_beachofSouthChina. JournalofNaturalResources (自然资源学报), 18,589-594. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract).
[4]	Liu YL (刘友良) (1992). WaterStressPhysiologyofPlant (植物水分逆境生理). ChinaAgriculturePress, Beijing,77. (inChinese).
[5]	Liu ZP (刘兆普), Liu L (刘玲), Chen MD (陈铭达) (2003a). Studyontheirrigationsystemsinagriculturebyseawater. JournalofNaturalResources (自然资源学报), 18,423-430. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract).
[6]	Liu ZP (刘兆普), Deng LQ (邓力群), Shen QR (沈其荣), Chen MD (陈铭达), Liu L (刘玲) (2003b). Effectsofseawa terirrigationonthegrowthofrumexplant. ActaPedologigaSinaca (土壤学报), 40,791-794. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract).
[7]	Wu JM (吴家梅), Liu ZP (刘兆普) (2003). Effectonultrami crostructureandchlorophyllcontentofAloeunderseawaterstress. JournalofNanjingAgriculturalUniversity (南京农业大学学报), 26 (3),59-62. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract).
[8]	Xu XM (许详明), Ye HC (叶和春), Li GF (李国凤) (2000). Progressinresearchofplanttolerancetosalingstress. ChineseJournalofApplied&EnvironmentalBiology (应用与环境生物学报), 6,379-387. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract).
[9]	Zhao GM (赵耕毛), Liu ZP (刘兆普), Chen MD (陈铭达) (2003a). Studyonsalinitysituationofseashoresalinesoilunderseawaterirrigation. ScientiaAgriculturaSinica (中国农业科学), 36,676-680. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract).
[10]	Zhao GM (赵耕毛), Liu ZP (刘兆普), Chen MD (陈铭达) (2003b). Simulationonwaterandsaltmovementinseashoresalinesoilunderdifferentrainfallintensities. JournalofNanjingAgriculturalUniversity (南京农业大学学报), 26 (2),51-54. (inChinesewithEnglishabstract).

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

1856

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	2	0	0	1854

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	165	1691
比例	9%	91%

摘要

4623

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	4623

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	221	4402
比例	5%	95%

剖面深度 Section depth (cm)	pH	含盐量 Salt content (g·kg^-1)	有机质 Organic content (g·kg^-1)	砂粒 Sand grain (g·kg^-1) (2~0.02 mm)	粉粒 Silt (g·kg^-1) (0.02~0.002 mm)	粘粒 Clay (g·kg^-1) (<0.002 mm)	容重 Volume weight (g·cm^-3)
0~20	7.55	0.379	10.52	826.0	89.4	84.6	1.265
20~40	7.50	0.401	4.42	826.3	80.7	93.0	1.576
40~60	8.17	0.480	2.48	826.5	80.5	93.4	1.501
60~80	7.71	0.647	-	859.9	69.1	71.0	1.484
80~100	7.94	0.731	-	861.6	70.3	74.1	1.496
100~135	8.12	0.724	-	806.3	111.4	82.3	1.478
135~185	7.70	0.355	-	970.5	5.4	24.1	1.542
185~200	7.50	1.387	-	525.0	295.4	179.0	1.647

剖面深度 Section depth (cm)	pH	含盐量 Salt content (g·kg^-1)	有机质 Organic content (g·kg^-1)	砂粒 Sand grain (g·kg^-1) (2~0.02 mm)	粉粒 Silt (g·kg^-1) (0.02~0.002 mm)	粘粒 Clay (g·kg^-1) (<0.002 mm)	容重 Volume weight (g·cm^-3)
0~20	7.55	0.379	10.52	826.0	89.4	84.6	1.265
20~40	7.50	0.401	4.42	826.3	80.7	93.0	1.576
40~60	8.17	0.480	2.48	826.5	80.5	93.4	1.501
60~80	7.71	0.647	-	859.9	69.1	71.0	1.484
80~100	7.94	0.731	-	861.6	70.3	74.1	1.496
100~135	8.12	0.724	-	806.3	111.4	82.3	1.478
135~185	7.70	0.355	-	970.5	5.4	24.1	1.542
185~200	7.50	1.387	-	525.0	295.4	179.0	1.647

处理 Treatment	重复 Reiteration	B1	B2	B3	B4	平均 Average
	1	40.00	34.50	38.50	39.00
A1	2	39.50	38.00	35.00	41.50
	3	38.50	35.00	38.50	40.00	38.42
	1	42.50	46.50	41.00	47.50
A2	2	42.50	44.00	45.00	42.50
	3	45.00	46.00	45.00	44.00	44.29
	平均 Average	41.34	41.17	40.50	42.42

处理 Treatment	重复 Reiteration	B1	B2	B3	B4	平均 Average
	1	40.00	34.50	38.50	39.00
A1	2	39.50	38.00	35.00	41.50
	3	38.50	35.00	38.50	40.00	38.42
	1	42.50	46.50	41.00	47.50
A2	2	42.50	44.00	45.00	42.50
	3	45.00	46.00	45.00	44.00	44.29
	平均 Average	41.34	41.17	40.50	42.42

处理 Treatment	产量 Yields (kg·10 m^-2)	p<0.05	p<0.01
A2B2	45.50	a	A
A2B4	44.67	a	A
A2B3	43.67	a	AB
A2B1	43.34	a	AB
A1B4	40.17	b	B
A1B1	39.33	b	B
A1B3	37.33	b	B
A1B2	35.83	b	B