环境胁迫影响三峡库区消落带草本和木本植物生理生态特征的meta分析

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2023.0127

植物生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 623-637.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0127 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2023.0127

环境胁迫影响三峡库区消落带草本和木本植物生理生态特征的meta分析

邓蓓, 王晓锋, 廖君^*()

山区生态系统碳循环与碳调控重庆市重点实验室, 三峡库区地表生态过程重庆市野外科学观测研究站, 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院, 重庆 401331

收稿日期:2023-05-08 接受日期:2023-10-09 出版日期:2024-05-20 发布日期:2023-10-10
通讯作者: *(junliao@cqnu.edu.cn)
基金资助:
重庆市教育委员会科学技术研究项目(KJQN202200534);重庆市博士“直通车”科研项目(CSTB2022BSXM-JCX0146)

Ecophysiological responses of herbaceous and woody plants to environmental stresses in the riparian zone of Three Gorges Reservoir: a meta-analysis

DENG Bei, WANG Xiao-Feng, LIAO Jun^*()

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling and Carbon Regulation in Mountainous Ecosystems, Chongqing Field Observation and Research Station of Earth Surface Ecological Processes in Three Gorges Reservoir Area, College of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China

Received:2023-05-08 Accepted:2023-10-09 Online:2024-05-20 Published:2023-10-10
Contact: *(junliao@cqnu.edu.cn)
Supported by:
Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission(KJQN202200534);Doctoral “Direct Train” Project of Chongqing(CSTB2022BSXM-JCX0146)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

三峡库区消落带适生草本与木本植物对环境胁迫的响应是生态系统结构与功能演变的重要机制。然而, 目前对消落带胁迫环境下草本和木本植物的响应特征及是否存在类群差异尚不清楚。该研究基于meta分析, 探讨了三峡消落带典型环境胁迫(水淹、干旱胁迫)对适生草本和木本植物生理生态特征的影响, 从物种和生活型的角度揭示了消落带适生植物类群对水淹、干旱胁迫的响应规律。结果表明: (1)草本植物和木本植物在环境胁迫下均表现出明显的生长发育抑制以及生理生化策略的适应性响应, 主要表现在各组织器官生物量、光合速率的下降, 丙二醛和脯氨酸含量的增加, 以及抗氧化酶(超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化物酶、过氧化氢酶)活性增强。(2)水淹胁迫对草本植物生物量负效应最强, 干旱胁迫次之; 水淹胁迫对木本植物总叶绿素含量和光合速率负效应最大, 干旱胁迫次之, 表现出环境胁迫作用的生活型效应; 但草本与木本植物的总叶绿素含量均对水淹胁迫响应最敏感, 而木本植物对干旱胁迫表现出一定的内稳态。木本植物在生理生化方面对水淹胁迫的响应比草本植物更显著, 且主要体现在气孔导度、丙二醛含量、脯氨酸含量和过氧化物酶活性方面的响应与草本植物存在差异; 而草本植物对干旱胁迫的响应比木本植物更显著, 主要表现为总叶绿素含量、水分利用效率、抗氧化酶(超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化物酶、过氧化氢酶)活性方面的响应与木本植物存在差异。(3)草本和木本植物对不同环境胁迫的形态响应具有组织特异性差异。草本植物主要以根部、茎部和叶片形态的变化适应水淹和干旱胁迫, 木本植物则主要以根部形态的变化为主。

关键词: 三峡库区, 植物, 生理生态, 环境胁迫, meta分析

Abstract:

Aims The response of herbaceous and woody plants to environmental stress is an important mechanism for the evolution of ecosystem structure and function in hydro-fluctuation belt of Three Gorges Reservoir. However, the pertinent response characteristics and whether there are group differences in these stress responses are still unclear.

Methods Here, we undertook a meta-analysis of the effects of typical environmental stresses (flooding and drought stress) on the physiological and ecological characteristics of suitable herbaceous and woody plants in the Three Gorges hydro-fluctuation belt, with an aim to reveal the response of suitable plant groups to flooding and drought stress from the perspective of species and life forms.

Important findings The results showed that: (1) Herbaceous plants and woody plants showed obvious growth and development inhibition and adaptive response in physiological and biochemical strategies under environmental stress, mainly manifested in the decrease of biomass and photosynthetic rate of each tissue and organ, the increase of malondialdehyde and proline content, and the initiation of antioxidant enzyme system (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase). (2) Flooding stress had the strongest negative effect on herbaceous plant biomass, followed by drought stress. Flooding stress had the greatest negative effect on total chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of woody plants, followed by drought stress, showing the life-form effect of environmental stress. However, the total chlorophyll content of herbaceous and woody plants was most sensitive to flooding stress, while woody plants showed a certain homeostasis to drought stress. The physiological and biochemical responses of woody plants to flooding stress were more significant than those of herbaceous plants, and the responses were mainly different from those of herbaceous plants in stomatal conductance, malondialdehyde and proline content, and peroxidase activity. The herbaceous plants showed stronger response to drought stress than did woody plants, and the response of total chlorophyll content, water use efficiency and antioxidant enzyme (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase) activity was different from that of woody plants. (3) The morphological responses of herbaceous and woody plants to different environmental stresses have tissue-specific differences. Herbaceous plants mainly adapt to flooding and drought stress by morphological changes of roots, stems and leaves, while woody plants mainly adapt via morphological changes of roots. In summary, this study presents an integrated view of the morphological and physiological characteristics of herbaceous and woody plants in response to environmental stress in the hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir, which provided a scientific basis for evaluating the potential of different life-form vegetation in the ecological structure and functional restoration in this ecologically-important region.

Key words: Three Gorges Reservoir, plant, physiological ecology, environmental stress, meta-analysis

邓蓓, 王晓锋, 廖君. 环境胁迫影响三峡库区消落带草本和木本植物生理生态特征的meta分析. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 623-637. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0127

DENG Bei, WANG Xiao-Feng, LIAO Jun. Ecophysiological responses of herbaceous and woody plants to environmental stresses in the riparian zone of Three Gorges Reservoir: a meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2024, 48(5): 623-637. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0127

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2023.0127

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2024/V48/I5/623

图/表 9

表1 三峡库区消落带常见草本植物和木本植物

Table 1 Common herbs and woody plants in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir

生活型 Life form	科名 Family	种名 Species
草本 Herb	莎草科 Cyperaceae	香附子 Cyperus rotundus
	禾本科 Poaceae	芦苇 Phragmites australis
		扁穗牛鞭草 Hemarthria compressa
		狗牙根 Cynodon dactylon
		狗尾草 Setaria viridis
		野古草 Arundinella hirta
		香根草 Chrysopogon zizanioides
		双穗雀稗 Paspalum distichum
	蓼科 Polygonaceae	水蓼 Persicaria hydropiper
		酸模叶蓼 Persicaria lapathifolia
	菊科 Asteraceae	苍耳 Xanthium sibiricum
		马兰 Aster indicus
	苋科 Amaranthaceae	喜旱莲子草 Alternanthera philoxeroides
	三白草科 Saururaceae	蕺菜 Houttuynia cordata
	天南星科 Araceae	菖蒲 Acorus Calamus
木本 Wood	胡桃科 Juglandaceae	枫杨 Pterocarya stenoptera
	壳斗科 Fagaceae	栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis
	松科 Pinaceae	湿地松 Pinus elliottii
	杉科 Taxodiaceae	水松 Glyptostrobus pensilis
		水杉 Metasequoia glyptostroboides
		池杉 Taxodium ascendens
		落羽杉 Taxodium distichum
		中山杉 Taxodium ‘Zhongshanshan’
	大戟科 Euphorbiaceae	乌桕 Triadica sebifera
	桑科 Moraceae	桑 Morus alba
	桦木科 Betulaceae	水桦 Betula nigra
	杨柳科 Salicaceae	旱柳 Salix matsudana
		秋华柳 Salix variegate
		南川柳 Salix rosthornii
	樟科 Lauraceae	樟 Camphora officinarum
	含羞草科 Mimosaceae	银合欢 Leucaena leucocephala
	金缕梅科 Hamamelidaceae	中华蚊母树 Distylium chinen
	黄杨科 Buxaceae	宜昌黄杨 Buxus ichangensis

图1 水淹条件下草本植物与木本植物的生物量、形态变化。水平虚线表示响应比为0, 方块和误差棒表示平均值和95%置信区间。误差线与0线相交表示处理与对照不存在显著差异(p > 0.05); 误差线在0线以上表示为显著正相关, 误差线在0线以下表示为显著负相关(p < 0.05)。括号内数字表示物种样本数量。Ac, 菖蒲; Ap, 喜旱莲子草; Cd, 狗牙根; Cr, 香附子; Cz, 香根草; Dc, 中华蚊母树; Hc, 扁穗牛鞭草; Mg, 水杉; Pe, 湿地松; Ph, 水蓼; Ps, 枫杨; Sr, 南川柳; Sv, 狗尾草; Tz, 中山杉。

Fig. 1 Biomass and morphological changes of herbaceous plants and woody plants under flooding conditions. The horizontal dotted line indicates that the response ratio is 0, and the square and the error bar indicate the mean and the 95% confidence interval. There was no significant difference between the treatment and the control in the intersection of the 0 line (p > 0.05). The error line is expressed as a significant positive correlation above the 0 line, and the error line is expressed as a significant negative correlation below the zero line (p < 0.05). Numbers in brackets indicate sample size. Ac, Acorus calamus; Ap, Alternanthera philoxeroides; Cd, Cynodon dactylon; Cr, Cyperus rotundus; Cz, Chrysopogon zizanioides; Dc, Distylium chinen; Hc, Hemarthria compressa; Mg, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; Pe, Pinus elliottii; Ph, Persicaria hydropiper; Ps, Pterocarya stenoptera; Sr, Salix rosthornii; Sv, Setaria viridis; Tz, Taxodium ‘Zhongshanshan’.

图2 水淹条件下草本植物与木本植物的光合色素含量和光合参数含量变化。水平虚线表示响应比为0, 方块和误差棒表示平均值和95%置信区间。误差线与0线相交表示处理与对照不存在显著差异(p > 0.05); 误差线在0线以上表示为显著正相关, 误差线在0线以下表示为显著负相关(p < 0.05)。括号内数字表示物种样本数量。空缺位置表示该物种无对应数据(A-E)。Cd, 狗牙根; Cr, 香附子; Cz, 香根草; Dc, 中华蚊母树; Hc, 扁穗牛鞭草; Ma, 桑; Pa, 芦苇; Pe, 湿地松; Ph, 水蓼; Ps, 枫杨; Sv, 狗尾草; Sva, 秋华柳; Ta, 池杉; Td, 落羽杉。

Fig. 2 Changes of photosynthetic pigment content and photosynthetic parameters of herbaceous plants and woody plants under flooding conditions. The horizontal dotted line indicates that the response ratio is 0, and the square and the error bar indicate the mean and the 95% confidence interval. There was no significant difference between the treatment and the control in the intersection of the 0 line (p > 0.05). The error line is expressed as a significant positive correlation above the 0 line, and the error line is expressed as a significant negative correlation below the zero line (p < 0.05). Numbers in brackets indicate sample size. The vacancy position indicates that the species has no corresponding data (A-E). Cd, Cynodon dactylon; Cr, Cyperus rotundus; Cz, Chrysopogon zizanioides; Dc, Distylium chinen; Hc, Hemarthria compressa; Ma, Morus alba; Pa, Phragmites australis; Pe, Pinus elliottii; Ph, Persicaria hydropiper; Ps, Pterocarya stenoptera; Sv, Setaria viridis; Sva, Salix variegate; Ta, Taxodium ascendens; Td, Taxodium distichum. Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; Gs, stomatal conductivity; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; Tr, transpiration rate; T Chl, total chlorophyll.

图3 水淹条件下草本植物与木本植物的各项生理指标变化。水平虚线表示响应比为0, 方块和误差棒表示平均值和95%置信区间。误差线与0线相交表示处理与对照不存在显著差异(p > 0.05); 误差线在0线以上表示为显著正相关, 误差线在0线以下表示为显著负相关(p < 0.05)。括号内数字表示物种样本数量。空缺位置表示该物种无对应数据(A、B)。Ai, 马兰; Cd, 狗牙根; Co, 樟; Cr, 香附子; Dc, 中华蚊母树; Hc, 扁穗牛鞭草; Hco, 蕺菜; Mg, 水杉; Pd, 双穗雀稗; Pe, 湿地松; Pl, 酸模叶蓼; Sr, 南川柳; Sva, 秋华柳; Xs, 苍耳。CAT activity, 过氧化氢酶活性; MDA content, 丙二醛含量; POD activity, 过氧化物酶活性; Pro content, 脯氨酸含量; SOD activity, 超氧化物歧化酶活性。

Fig. 3 Changes of physiological indexes of herbaceous plants and woody plants under flooding. The horizontal dotted line indicates that the response ratio is 0, and the square and the error bar indicate the mean and the 95% confidence interval. There was no significant difference between the treatment and the control in the intersection of the 0 line (p > 0.05). The error line is expressed as a significant positive correlation above the 0 line, and the error line is expressed as a significant negative correlation below the zero line (p < 0.05). Numbers in brackets indicate sample size.The vacancy position indicates that the species has no corresponding data (A, B). Ai, Aster indicus; Cd, Cynodon dactylon; Co, Camphora officinarum; Cr, Cyperus rotundus; Dc, Distylium chinen; Hc, Hemarthria compressa; Hco, Houttuynia cordata; Mg, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; Pd, Paspalum distichum; Pe, Pinus elliottii; Pl, Persicaria lapathifolia; Sr, Salix rosthornii; Sva, Salix variegate; Xs, Xanthium sibiricum. CAT, catalase; MDA, malondialdehyde; Pro, proline; POD, peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase.

图4 干旱条件下草本植物与木本植物的生物量、形态变化。水平虚线表示响应比为0, 方块和误差棒表示平均值和95%置信区间。误差线与0线相交表示处理与对照不存在显著差异(p > 0.05); 误差线在0线以上表示为显著正相关, 误差线在0线以下表示为显著负相关(p < 0.05)。括号内数字表示物种样本数量。Ar, 根表面积; As, 比根面积; H, 株高; No., 叶片数; L, 叶长; Lr, 侧根数; W, 叶宽。

Fig. 4 Biomass changes and morphological changes of herbaceous plants and woody plants under drought conditions. The horizontal dotted line indicates that the response ratio is 0, and the square and the error bar indicate the mean and the 95% confidence interval. There was no significant difference between the treatment and the control in the intersection of the 0 line (p > 0.05). The error line is expressed as a significant positive correlation above the 0 line, and the error line is expressed as a significant negative correlation below the zero line (p < 0.05). Numbers in brackets indicate sample size. Ar, root surface; As, specific root area; H, plant height; No., blade number; L, leaf length; Lr, lateral root number; W, leaf width.

图5 干旱条件下草本植物与木本植物的光合色素、光合参数、水分效率变化量。水平虚线表示响应比为0, 方块和误差棒表示平均值和95%置信区间。误差线与0线相交表示处理与对照不存在显著差异(p > 0.05); 误差线在0线以上表示为显著正相关, 误差线在0线以下表示为显著负相关(p < 0.05)。括号内数字表示物种样本数量。空缺位置表示该物种无对应数据(A-F)。Cd, 狗牙根; Hc, 扁穗牛鞭草; Ll, 银合欢; Ma, 桑; Pa, 芦苇; Pe, 湿地松; Ps, 枫杨; Ta, 池杉; Td, 落羽杉。

Fig. 5 Changes of photosynthetic pigments, photosynthetic parameters and water efficiency of herbaceous plants and woody plants under drought conditions. The horizontal dotted line indicates that the response ratio is 0, and the square and the error bar indicate the mean and the 95% confidence interval. There was no significant difference between the treatment and the control in the intersection of the 0 line (p > 0.05). The error line is expressed as a significant positive correlation above the 0 line, and the error line is expressed as a significant negative correlation below the zero line (p < 0.05). Numbers in brackets indicate sample size. The vacancy position indicates that the species has no corresponding data (A-F). Cd, Cynodon dactylon; Hc, Hemarthria compressa; Ll, Leucaena leucocephala; Ma, Morus alba; Pa, Phragmites australis; Pe, Pinus elliottii; Ps, Pterocarya stenoptera; Ta, Taxodium ascendens; Td, Taxodium distichum. Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; Gs, stomatal conductivity; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; Tr, transpiration rate; T Chl, total chlorophyll; WUE, water use efficiency.

图6 干旱条件下草本植物与木本植物的各项生理指标变化。水平虚线表示响应比为0, 方块和误差棒表示平均值和95%置信区间。误差线与0线相交表示处理与对照不存在显著差异(p > 0.05); 误差线在0线以上表示为显著正相关, 误差线在0线以下表示为显著负相关(p < 0.05)。括号内数字表示物种样本数量。空缺位置表示该物种无对应数据(A、B)。Ac, 菖蒲; Cd, 狗牙根; Cz, 香根草; Hc, 扁穗牛鞭草; Ma, 桑; Mg, 水杉; Ps, 枫杨; Sr, 南川柳; Sva, 秋华柳; Tz, 中山杉。CAT activity, 过氧化氢酶活性; MDA content, 丙二醛含量; POD activity, 过氧化物酶活性; Pro content, 脯氨酸含量; SOD activity, 超氧化物歧化酶活性。

Fig. 6 Changes of physiological indexes of herbaceous plants and woody plants under drought. The horizontal dotted line indicates that the response ratio is 0, and the square and the error bar indicate the mean and the 95% confidence interval. There was no significant difference between the treatment and the control in the intersection of the 0 line (p > 0.05). The error line is expressed as a significant positive correlation above the 0 line, and the error line is expressed as a significant negative correlation below the zero line (p < 0.05). Numbers in brackets indicate sample size.The vacancy position indicates that the species has no corresponding data (A, B). Ac, Acorus Calamus; Cd, Cynodon dactylon; Cz, Chrysopogon zizanioides; Hc, Hemarthria compressa; Ma, Morus alba; Mg, Metasequoia glyptostroboides; Ps, Pterocarya stenoptera; Sr, Salix rosthornii; Sv, Setaria viridis; Tz, Taxodium ‘Zhongshanshan’. CAT, catalase; MDA, malondialdehyde; Pro, proline; POD, peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase.

表2 不同胁迫下草本植物与木本植物的生物量、总叶绿素含量和净光合速率的变化量(%)和95%置信区间

Table 2 Changes (%) and 95% confidence interval of biomass, total chlorophyll (T Chl) content and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of herbaceous plants and woody plants under different stresses

生活型 Life form	胁迫 Stress	生物量 Biomass	总叶绿素含量 T Chl content	净光合速率 P_n
草本 Herb	水淹胁迫 Flooding stress	-53.48 [-61.22, -44.19]	-12.93 [-20.28, -4.92]	-17.50 [-30.41, -2.20]
草本 Herb	干旱胁迫 Drought stress	-20.49 [-33.89, -4.39]	-11.64 [-18.00, -4.77]	-17.99 [-23.10, -12.54]
木本 Wood	水淹胁迫 Flooding stress	-35.68 [-44.96, -24.84]	-28.66 [-35.39, -21.23]	-36.06 [-42.01, -29.50]
木本 Wood	干旱胁迫 Drought stress	-19.92 [-28.89, -9.82]	1.23 [-3.68, 6.37]	-14.32 [-24.15, -3.23]

图7 草本植物与木本植物在环境胁迫下的形态差异及共同响应特征示意图。红色箭头表示减少或抑制, 绿色箭头表示增加或促进。绿色和红色箭头并列表示先促进后抑制。

Fig. 7 Schematic diagram of morphological differences and common response characteristics of herbaceous plants and woody plants under environmental stress. Red arrows indicate decrease or inhibition, and green arrows indicate increase or promotion. The green and red arrows are juxtaposed to indicate first promotion and then inhibition. CAT, catalase; POD, peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase.

参考文献 56

[1]	Ai LJ, Wang S, Zhang YL (2013a). Effects of drought stress and recovery on antioxidant enzyme activities of Salix rosthornii Seemen. Chinese Agricultural Science, 29(13), 14-19.
	[艾丽皎, 王胜, 张银龙 (2013a). 消落带植物南川柳对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 中国农学通报, 29(13), 14-19.]
[2]	Ai LJ, Wu ZN, Zhang YL (2013b). A summary of water-level- fluctuating zone. Ecological Science, 32, 259-264.
	[艾丽皎, 吴志能, 张银龙 (2013b). 水体消落带国内外研究综述. 生态科学, 32, 259-264.]
[3]	Anderson PH, Pezeshki SR (1999). The effects of intermittent flooding on seedlings of three forest species. Photosynthetica, 37, 543-552.
[4]	Bai LL, Han WJ, Li CX (2015a). Effects of flooding on responses of Metasequoia glyptostroboides saplings to drought. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 43(5), 42-50.
	[白林利, 韩文娇, 李昌晓 (2015a). 前期水淹对水杉树苗响应干旱胁迫的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 43(5), 42-50.]
[5]	Bai LL, Han WJ, Li CX (2015b). Effects of simulated waterlogging on growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics of Metasequoia glyptostroboides seedlings. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 41, 505-515.
	[白林利, 韩文娇, 李昌晓 (2015b). 模拟水淹对水杉苗木生长与生理生化特性的影响. 浙江大学学报, 41, 505-515.]
[6]	Castonguay Y, Nadeau P, Simard RR (1993). Effects of flooding on carbohydrate and ABA levels in roots and shoots of alfalfa. Plant, Cell & Environment, 16, 695-702.
[7]	Chen FQ, Li Y, Xi GW (2008). The ecophysiological response of Polygonum hydropiper plants to simulated flooding. Ecological and Environment, 17, 1096-1099.
	[陈芳清, 李永, 郄光武 (2008). 水蓼对模拟水淹的生理生态学响应. 生态环境, 17, 1096-1099.]
[8]	Chen SF, Shu QY (1999). Biological mechanism of and genetic engineering for drought stress tolerance in plants. Acta Botanica Sinica, 16, 555-560.
	[陈善福, 舒庆尧 (1999). 植物耐干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展. 植物学报, 16, 555-560.]
[9]	Chen T (2009). Effect of waterflooding on the formation of aerenchymas in the stems of Arundinella anomala and Salix variegata seedlings. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 37, 7265-7266.
	[陈婷 (2009). 水淹对野古草和秋华柳幼苗茎通气组织形成的影响. 安徽农业科学, 37, 7265-7266.]
[10]	Chen T, Zeng B, Ye XQ, Luo FL, Liu D (2007). Effect of flooding on adventitious root formation of Arundinella anomala Steud. and Salix variegata Franch. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 35, 5703-5704.
	[陈婷, 曾波, 叶小齐, 罗芳丽, 刘巅 (2007). 水淹对野古草和秋华柳不定根形成的影响. 安徽农业科学, 35, 5703-5704.]
[11]	Davanso VM, de Souza LA, Medri ME, Pimenta JA, Bianchini E (2002). Photosynthesis, growth and development of Tabebuia avellanedae Lor. ex Griseb. (Bignoniaceae) in flooded soil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 45, 375-384.
[12]	Elcan JM, Pezeshki SR (2002). Effects of flooding on susceptibility of Taxodium distichum L. seedings to drought. Photosynthetica, 40, 177-182.
[13]	Feng DL, Huang XH, Xiang ZH, Qi B, Qin J, Geng YH (2013). Mulberry growth and variation of soil nitrogen and phosphorus content under artificial drought created to simulate hydro- fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Science of Sericulture, 39, 862-867.
	[冯大兰, 黄小辉, 向仲怀, 漆波, 秦俭, 耿养会 (2013). 桑树在模拟三峡库区消落带干旱条件下的生长状况及土壤氮磷元素的变化. 蚕业科学, 39, 862-867.]
[14]	Gan LP, Ren L, Li H, Wang LC (2021). Physiological and structural responses of Betula nigra to periodic flooding in Three Gorges Reservoir fluctuating zone. Forest Research, 34(1), 146-152.
	[甘丽萍, 任立, 李豪, 王立春 (2021). 三峡库区消落带水桦(Betula nigra)周期性水淹后的生理与结构响应. 林业科学研究, 34(1), 146-152.]
[15]	Guo QS, Hong M, Kang Y, Pei SX, Cheng RM (2010). Research development on hydro-fluctuation belt plants. World Forestry Research, 23(4), 14-20.
	[郭泉水, 洪明, 康义, 裴顺祥, 程瑞梅 (2010). 消落带适生植物研究进展. 世界林业研究, 23(4), 14-20.]
[16]	Guo QS, Kang Y, Hong M, Jin JQ, Zhu NN, Nie BH, Wang ZQ (2013). Responses of terrestrial plants in hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir area to the first time flooding-drying habitat change. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 49(5), 1-9.
	[郭泉水, 康义, 洪明, 金江群, 朱妮妮, 聂必红, 王佐庆 (2013). 三峡库区消落带陆生植被对首次水陆生境变化的响应. 林业科学, 49(5), 1-9.]
[17]	Gao XM, Chen LZ (1998). The revision of plant life-form system and an analysis of the life-form spectrum of forest plans in warm temperate zone of China. Acta Botanica Sinica, 40(6), 70-76.
	[高贤明, 陈灵芝 (1998). 植物生活型分类系统的修订及中国暖温带森林植物生活型谱分析. 植物学报, 40(6), 70-76.]
[18]	Han RH, Lu XS (2006). Studies on adaptive mechanism of alfalfa in drought stress at seedling stage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 14, 393-394.
	[韩瑞宏, 卢欣石 (2006). 苗期紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫的适应机制. 草地学报, 14, 393-394.] DOI
[19]	Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999). The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology, 80, 1150-1156.
[20]	Huang SY, Ma LH, Fang W, Liu Y, Chen XY (2013). Study on the reconstruction and ecological restoration techniques of vegetation in hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 33(3), 74-78.
	[黄世友, 马立辉, 方文, 刘杨, 陈雪影 (2013). 三峡库区消落带植被重建与生态修复技术研究. 西南林业大学学报, 33(3), 74-78.]
[21]	Huang XH, Liu Y, Li JX, Xiong XZ, Yin XH, Chen Y, Feng DL, Li S (2013a). Effects of simulated soil drought on physiological characteristics of young mulberry (Morus alba L.) trees in the hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 35(9), 127-132.
	[黄小辉, 刘芸, 李佳杏, 熊兴政, 尹小华, 陈阳, 冯大兰, 李沙 (2013a). 模拟三峡库区消落带土壤干旱对桑树生理特性的影响. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 35(9), 127-132.]
[22]	Huang XH, Liu Y, Li JX, Xiong XZ, Yin XH, Chen Y, Qin J, Huang XZ, Du YW (2012b). Effects of water stress on physiological characteristics of mulberry (Morus alba) seedlings in the hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 48(12), 122-127.
	[黄小辉, 刘芸, 李佳杏, 熊兴政, 尹小华, 陈阳, 秦俭, 黄先智, 杜英武 (2012b). 水分胁迫对三峡库区消落带桑树幼苗生理特性的影响. 林业科学, 48(12), 122-127.]
[23]	Huang XH, Yin XH, Liu Y, Li JX, Xiong XZ, Chen Y (2012). Effect of drought stress on mulberry growth in water- fluctuating zone in Three Gorges Reservoir area. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science), 29(3), 57-60.
	[黄小辉, 尹小华, 刘芸, 李佳杏, 熊兴政, 陈阳 (2012). 干旱胁迫对三峡库区消落带桑树生长的影响. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 29(3), 57-60.]
[24]	Jin JY, Zhang WH, Huang JG (2011). Effects of water stress on growth, nutrition and physiological indices of Hemarthria compressa. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 17, 1545-1550.
	[靳军英, 张卫华, 黄建国 (2011). 干旱对扁穗牛鞭草生长、营养及生理指标的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 17, 1545-1550.]
[25]	Li Q (2016). Influence of sand burial and drought on growth recovery of Cynodon dactylon in a water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 200-208.
	[李强 (2016). 泥沙掩埋和干旱对三峡库区消落带狗牙根生长恢复的影响. 生态学报, 36, 200-208.]
[26]	Li Q, Gao X, Ding WQ, Zhu QH, Ou Y, Liu Y (2012). Influence of perennial flooding and drought on growth restoration of Acorus calamus in water-level-fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Environmental Science, 33, 2628-2633.
	[李强, 高祥, 丁武泉, 朱启红, 欧媛, 刘瑜 (2012). 常年淹水和干旱对三峡库区消落带菖蒲生长恢复的影响. 环境科学, 33, 2628-2633.]
[27]	Li Q, Wang SM, Ding WQ, Zhu QH (2017). Influence of sand burial and drought on the growth of Paspalum distichum in water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 36, 649-654.
	[李强, 王书敏, 丁武泉, 朱启红 (2017). 泥沙掩埋和干旱对三峡库区消落带双穗稗草生长的影响. 生态学杂志, 36, 649-654.]
[28]	Li SZ, Deng Y, Shi FN, Hu MM, Pang BH, Wang YC, Li K, Chen M, Peng WQ, Qu XD, Bao YF, Meng JJ (2019). Research progress on water-level-fluctuation zones of reservoirs: a review. Wetland Science, 17, 689-696.
	[李姗泽, 邓玥, 施凤宁, 胡明明, 庞博慧, 王雨春, 李坤, 陈铭, 彭文启, 渠晓东, 包宇飞, 孟晶晶 (2019). 水库消落带研究进展. 湿地科学, 17, 689-696.]
[29]	Li XX, He YY, Yang WH, Wang CY, Yan JW, Cui Z, Li CX (2018). Effects of different water conditions and plant density on the growth and interspecific competition of Hemarthria compressa and Cynodon dactylon. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 3046-3058.
	[李晓雪, 贺燕燕, 杨文航, 王朝英, 燕江伟, 崔振, 李昌晓 (2018). 不同水分处理和密度配置对牛鞭草与狗牙根生长与种间竞争的影响. 生态学报, 38, 3046-3058.]
[30]	Liu JH, Lin F, Shi SH, Ayi QL, Liu SP, Zeng B (2017). Effects of water level regulation on the seed germination and production of annual plant Xanthium sibiricum in the water-level-fluctuating-zone of Three Gorges Reservoir. Scientific Reports, 7, 5056. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017- 04599-4.
[31]	Liu ZB, Cheng RM, Xiao WF, Guo QS, Wang N (2014). Effect of flooding on growth, photosynthesis and fluorescence characteristics of Distylium chinense. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 50(9), 73-81.
	[刘泽彬, 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 郭泉水, 王娜 (2014). 模拟水淹对中华蚊母树生长及光合特性的影响. 林业科学, 50(9), 73-81.]
[32]	Liu ZB, Cheng RM, Xiao WF, Guo QS, Wang XR, Feng XH (2013a). Effects of submergence on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Rhizoma cyperi in hydro- fluctuation belt of Three Gorges Reservoir area, Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 32, 2015-2022.
	[刘泽彬, 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 郭泉水, 王晓荣, 封晓辉 (2013a). 淹水对三峡库区消落带香附子生长及光合特性的影响. 生态学杂志, 32, 2015-2022.]
[33]	Liu ZB, Cheng RM, Xiao WF, Guo QS, Wang YH, Wang N (2015). Effect of submergence on physiological characteristics of Cyperus rotundus in hydro-fluctuation belt of Three Gorges Reservoir area. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 35, 1190-1197.
	[刘泽彬, 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 郭泉水, 王彦辉, 王娜 (2015). 淹水对三峡库区消落带香附子生理特性的影响. 西北植物学报, 35, 1190-1197.]
[34]	Liu ZB, Cheng RM, Xiao WF, Guo QS, Wang YH, Wang N (2016). Growth and physiological responses of seedlings of Distylium chinense to autumn and winter flooding. Lake Sciences, 28, 405-413.
	[刘泽彬, 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 郭泉水, 王彦辉, 王娜 (2016). 中华蚊母树(Distylium chinense)幼苗对秋、冬季淹水的生长及生理响应. 湖泊科学, 28, 405-413.]
[35]	Liu ZB, Cheng RM, Xiao WF, Wang RL, Feng XH, Wang XR (2013b). Effect of waterlogging on photosynthetic and physioecological characteristics of plants. World Forestry Research, 26(3), 33-38.
	[刘泽彬, 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 王瑞丽, 封晓辉, 王晓荣 (2013b). 水淹胁迫对植物光合生理生态的影响. 世界林业研究, 26(3), 33-38.]
[36]	Lu ZJ, Jiang MX (2012). Vegetation restoration strategy in fluctuating zone of Three Gorges Reservoir area. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science), 29(3), 27-30.
	[卢志军, 江明喜 (2012). 三峡库区消涨带植被恢复策略. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 29(3), 27-30.]
[37]	Martínez JP, Silva H, Ledent JF, Pinto M (2007). Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 26, 30-38.
[38]	New T, Xie Z (2008). Impacts of large dams on riparian vegetation: applying global experience to the case of China’s Three Gorges Dam. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 3149-3163.
[39]	Ni X, Zhou BZ, Cao YH, Lu XZ (2017). Impact of drought stress on plant photosynthetic physiology: a review. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 44(2), 34-39.
	[倪霞, 周本智, 曹永慧, 鲁小珍 (2017). 干旱胁迫对植物光合生理影响研究进展. 江苏林业科技, 44(2), 34-39.]
[40]	Oliveira VC, Joly CA (2010). Flooding tolerance of Calophyllum brasiliense Camb. (Clusiaceae): morphological, physiological and growth responses. Trees, 24, 185-193.
[41]	Pezeshki SR (2001). Wetland plant responses to soil flooding. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 46, 299-312.
[42]	Pezeshki SR, Santos MI (1998). Relationships among rhizosphere oxygen deficiency, root restriction, photosynthesis, and growth in baldcypress (Taxodium distichum L.) seedlings. Photosynthetica, 35, 381-390.
[43]	Sack L, Holbrook NM (2006). Leaf hydraulics. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57, 361-381. PMID
[44]	Sack L, Scoffoni C (2013). Leaf venation: structure, function, development, evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future. New Phytologist, 198, 983-1000. DOI PMID
[45]	Sack L, Tyree MT, Holbrook NM (2005). Leaf hydraulic architecture correlates with regeneration irradiance in tropical rainforest trees. New Phytologist, 167, 403-413. PMID
[46]	Shen ZF, Zhang KJ, Xia X, Hu L (2021). Bibliometric analysis of the current situation and hot research topics on the water level fluctuation zone (WLFZ) of Three Gorges Reservoir. Journal of Hydroecology, 42(1), 26-34.
	[沈振锋, 张开金, 夏雪, 胡莲 (2021). 基于文献计量法的三峡库区消落带研究现状及热点分析. 水生态学杂志, 42(1), 26-34.]
[47]	Song PH, Zeng QW, Shang JZ, Ma B, Xiang ZH, He NJ (2013). Research progress in plant responses to waterlogging stress. Science of Sericulture, 39(1), 160-165.
	[宋鹏华, 曾其伟, 商敬哲, 马赑, 向仲怀, 何宁佳 (2013). 植物对水淹胁迫响应的研究进展. 蚕业科学, 39(1), 160-165.]
[48]	Sun R, Yuan XZ, Ding JJ (2010). Plant communities in water- level-fluctuation-zone of Baijia Stream in Three Gorges Reservoir after its initiate impounding to 156 m height. Wetland Science, 8, 1-7.
	[孙荣, 袁兴中, 丁佳佳 (2010). 三峡水库蓄水至156 m水位后白夹溪消落带植物群落生态学研究. 湿地科学, 8, 1-7.]
[49]	Tang Z, Kozlowski TT (1983). Responses of Pinusbanksiana and Pinusresinosa seedlings to flooding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 633-639.
[50]	Vartapetian BB, Jackson MB (1997). Plant adaptation to anaerobic stress. Annals of Botany, 79(Suppl. A), 3-20.
[51]	Wang CY, Li CX, Zhang Y (2013a). Effects of flooding on the photosynthetic physiology characteristics of Pterocarya stenoptera seedlings. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 675-682.
	[王朝英, 李昌晓, 张晔 (2013a). 水淹对枫杨幼苗光合生理特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 24, 675-682.]
[52]	Wang CY, Li CX, Zhang Y (2013b). Effects of submergence- drought stresses on growth and physiological characteristics of Salix rosthornii seedlings. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 49(12), 164-170.
	[王朝英, 李昌晓, 张晔 (2013b). 水淹-干旱胁迫对南川柳苗木生长及生理特性的影响. 林业科学, 49(12), 164-170.]
[53]	Wang XF, Li XX, Liu TT, Wang JL, Wu SN, Yuan XZ (2022). Trends and hotspots analysis of the researches on the drawdown zone of Three Gorges Reservoir based on CiteSpace. Ecological Science, 41, 249-261.
	[王晓锋, 李贤祥, 刘婷婷, 王继龙, 吴胜男, 袁兴中 (2022). 基于CiteSpace的三峡库区消落带研究热点与进展. 生态科学, 41, 249-261.]
[54]	Zhang JJ, Ren RR, Zhu JZ, Song C, Liu JF, Fu JQ, Hu HB, Wang JX, Li HM, Xu JJ (2012). Preliminary experimentation on flooding resistance of mulberry trees along the water- fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 48(5), 154-158.
	[张建军, 任荣荣, 朱金兆, 宋闯, 刘杰锋, 傅建强, 胡海波, 王建修, 李慧敏, 徐佳佳 (2012). 长江三峡水库消落带桑树耐水淹试验. 林业科学, 48(5), 154-158.]
[55]	Zhang YT, Zhang JJ, Wu XH, Wang JX, Duan FP (2015). Flooding tolerance of Taxodium hybrid ‘Zhongshanshan’ along the hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 13(2), 56-62.
	[张艳婷, 张建军, 吴晓洪, 王建修, 段丰沛 (2015). 长江三峡库区消落带中山杉耐淹试验. 中国水土保持科学, 13(2), 56-62.]
[56]	Zhao Q, Chen JB (2018). Study and practice on ecological restoration strategy of the hydro-fluctuation belt in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 46(34), 5-7
	[赵琴, 陈教斌 (2018). 三峡库区消落带生态修复策略研究与实践. 安徽农业科学, 46(34), 5-7.]

环境胁迫影响三峡库区消落带草本和木本植物生理生态特征的meta分析

Ecophysiological responses of herbaceous and woody plants to environmental stresses in the riparian zone of Three Gorges Reservoir: a meta-analysis

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 56

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈龙郭柯勾晓华赵秀海马泓若. 祁连圆柏林群落组成及特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0.
[2]	王振宇黄志群. 亚热带27种木本植物叶片性状对植食作用的影响: 验证生长-防御权衡假说[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0.
[3]	牛云明贾国栋王欣刘子赫. 庐山不同海拔植被蒸腾水龄动态及用水策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 0-0.
[4]	陈炫铮, 朱耀军, 高居娟, 刘一凡, 王荣, 方涛, 罗芳丽, 薛伟, 于飞海. 植物-土壤反馈时空变异研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 955-966.
[5]	秦嘉晨, 王欢, 朱江, 王扬, 田晨, 白永飞, 杨培志, 郑淑霞. 基于种内与种间性状变异的放牧过滤作用及其尺度效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(7): 858-871.
[6]	江康威, 张青青, 王亚菲, 李宏, 丁雨, 杨永强, 吐尔逊娜依•热依木. 放牧干扰下天山北坡中段植物功能群特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(6): 701-718.
[7]	胡蝶, 蒋欣琪, 戴志聪, 陈戴一, 张雨, 祁珊珊, 杜道林. 丛枝菌根真菌提高入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊对除草剂的耐受性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 651-659.
[8]	白皓然, 侯盟, 刘艳杰. 少花蒺藜草入侵与干旱对羊草群落生产力的影响机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 577-589.
[9]	曲泽坤, 朱丽琴, 姜琦, 王小红, 姚晓东, 蔡世锋, 罗素珍, 陈光水. 亚热带常绿阔叶林丛枝菌根树种养分觅食策略及其与细根形态间的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 416-427.
[10]	董劭琼, 侯东杰, 曲孝云, 郭柯. 柴达木盆地植物群落样方数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 534-540.
[11]	付粱晨, 丁宗巨, 唐茂, 曾辉, 朱彪. 北京东灵山白桦和蒙古栎的根际效应及其季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 508-522.
[12]	韩大勇, 李海燕, 张维, 杨允菲. 松嫩草地全叶马兰种群分株养分的季节运转及衰老过程[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 192-200.
[13]	耿雪琪, 唐亚坤, 王丽娜, 邓旭, 张泽凌, 周莹. 氮添加增加中国陆生植物生物量并降低其氮利用效率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 147-157.
[14]	王雨婷, 刘旭婧, 唐驰飞, 陈玮钰, 王美娟, 向松竹, 刘梅, 杨林森, 傅强, 晏召贵, 孟红杰. 神农架极小种群植物庙台槭群落特征及种群动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 80-91.
[15]	肖兰, 董标, 张琳婷, 邓传远, 李霞, 姜德刚, 林勇明. 渤海无居民海岛主要植被类型群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 127-134.