植物-土壤反馈时空变异研究进展

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2023.0390

植物生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 955-966.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0390 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2023.0390

• 综述 • 下一篇

植物-土壤反馈时空变异研究进展

陈炫铮¹, 朱耀军²^,³, 高居娟⁴, 刘一凡¹, 王荣⁵, 方涛¹, 罗芳丽¹^,⁶^,^*(), 薛伟⁷^,^*(), 于飞海⁷

¹北京林业大学生态与自然保护学院, 北京 100083
²中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所(湿地研究所), 北京 100091
³广东湛江红树林湿地生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 广东湛江 524448
⁴福建闽江河口湿地国家级自然保护区管理处, 福州 350200
⁵北京力科惠泽科技有限公司, 北京 100085
⁶黄河流域生态保护国家林业和草原局重点实验室, 北京 100083
⁷台州学院湿地与克隆生态学研究所, 浙江省植物进化生态学与保护重点实验室, 浙江台州 318000

收稿日期:2023-12-26 接受日期:2024-05-06 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-05-16
通讯作者: *罗芳丽(ecoluofangli@163.com);薛伟(x_wei1988@163.com)
基金资助:
第三次新疆综合科学考察项目(2022xjkk1200);国家自然科学基金(32071525);国家自然科学基金(32371584);国家自然科学基金(32001122);国家自然科学基金(32071527);国家林业和草原局应急揭榜挂帅项目(202302)

Research progress on spatial-temporal variation of plant-soil feedback

CHEN Xuan-Zheng¹, ZHU Yao-Jun²^,³, GAO Ju-Juan⁴, LIU Yi-Fan¹, WANG Rong⁵, FANG Tao¹, LUO Fang-Li¹^,⁶^,^*(), XUE Wei⁷^,^*(), YU Fei-Hai⁷

¹School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
²Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Research Institute of Wetland, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
³Guangdong Zhanjiang Mangrove Wetland Ecosystem State Positioning Observation Station, Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524448, China
⁴Fujian Minjiang River Estuary Wetland National Nature Reserve Administrative Office, Fuzhou 350200, China
⁵Beijing Eco-mind Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100085, China
⁶The Key Laboratory of Ecological Protection in the Yellow River Basin of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100083, China
⁷Institute of Wetland Ecology & Clone Ecology, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang 318000, China

Received:2023-12-26 Accepted:2024-05-06 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-05-16
Contact: LUO Fang-Li(ecoluofangli@163.com), XUE Wei(x_wei1988@163.com)
Supported by:
Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program(2022xjkk1200);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32071525);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32371584);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32001122);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32071527);National Forestry and Grassland Administration Emergency Leading the Charge with Open Competition Project(202302)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植物-土壤反馈作为植物分布、群落组成和演替的重要驱动力, 近年来受到广泛关注。时空变异是驱动植物-土壤反馈效应的重要因素, 但目前缺乏对其研究进展的梳理。该文综述了植物-土壤反馈时空变异的研究进展, 并提出了未来可以继续深入的研究方向。在植物-土壤反馈时间尺度上, 重点论述了植物不同发育阶段、实验周期与反馈效应的关系。在植物-土壤反馈的空间尺度上, 重点讨论了植物空间分布及空间转移、土壤微生物类群及理化因子空间位置差异以及地上与地下系统对反馈系统的影响。基于研究进展, 该文提出在反馈时间尺度上, 需关注长期的、多点的动态反馈过程, 提高反馈过程时间尺度上的分辨率; 应充分考虑微生物类群与驯化和测试植物作用的缓冲时间, 设置合理的驯化和反馈周期, 让研究结果更为客观; 在空间尺度上, 需关注植物空间分布、土壤因子空间异质性以及地上和地下系统对反馈效应的影响, 尽量做到接种土壤在物理结构上的相似性, 以期获得更真实的反馈效应。

关键词: 植物-土壤反馈, 时间格局, 空间格局, 群落演替

Abstract:

Plant-soil feedback (PSF), as an important driving force for plant distribution, community composition, and succession, has received extensive attention in recent years. The spatial-temporal variation are important factors driving PSF; however, there is currently a lack of review on its research progress. We summarized the research progress on the spatial-temporal variation of PSF and proposed research directions that could be pursued in the future. At the temporal scale of PSF, the relationships among plant developmental stages, experimental cycles, and feedback effects were emphasized. At the spatial scale of PSF, we focused on the spatial distribution and transfer of plants, the spatial differentiation of soil microbial communities and physicochemical factors, as well as the influence of above- and below-ground systems on PSF. Based on the research progress, we proposed to focus on the long-term, multi-point dynamic feedback to improve the temporal resolution of the feedback process. The buffering time of microbial communities on domesticated and tested plants needed to be considered, and reasonable domestication and feedback periods should be set to make the results more objective. At the spatial scale, the effects of plant spatial distribution, spatial heterogeneity of soil factors, and above- and below-ground systems on feedback effects should be paid attention. Efforts should be made to achieve similarity in the physical structure of the inoculated soil, in order to obtain more realistic feedback effects.

Key words: plant-soil feedback, temporal pattern, spatial pattern, community succession

陈炫铮, 朱耀军, 高居娟, 刘一凡, 王荣, 方涛, 罗芳丽, 薛伟, 于飞海. 植物-土壤反馈时空变异研究进展. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 955-966. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0390

CHEN Xuan-Zheng, ZHU Yao-Jun, GAO Ju-Juan, LIU Yi-Fan, WANG Rong, FANG Tao, LUO Fang-Li, XUE Wei, YU Fei-Hai. Research progress on spatial-temporal variation of plant-soil feedback. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2024, 48(8): 955-966. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0390

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2023.0390

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2024/V48/I8/955

图/表 2

图1 植物-土壤反馈的时空格局(A)及调控机制(B)。A中绿色和棕色箭头代表原物种继续生长, 黑色箭头代表新物种在原物种驯化后的土壤中生长; 不同颜色深浅的斑块代表物种对土壤的影响程度; 在时间尺度上, 植物生长时间越长, 微生物对土壤影响越大; 在空间尺度上, 随着空间向外扩展, 微生物对土壤的影响逐渐减弱。时间尺度(如驯化与反馈时间的长短等)对土壤中养分与微生物组成产生影响, 空间尺度(如纬度、海拔差异等)对土壤属性产生影响, 二者共同调控植物生长。所涉及的参考文献详见附录。

Fig. 1 Spatial-temporal pattern (A) and regulatory mechanism (B) of plant-soil feedback. In A, green and brown arrows indicate continued growth of the original species, and black arrows indicate growth of new species in the domesticated soil of original species. Patches with different shades of color represent the degree of soil influenced by new species. At the temporal scale, the longer time the plant grow, the greater the effect of microorganisms on soil. At the spatial scale, with the outward expansion of root space, the influence of microorganisms on soil gradually weakens. The time scale (e.g., domestication and feedback time) affects soil nutrient and microbial composition, and the spatial scale (e.g., latitude and altitude differences) affects soil properties, both of which jointly regulate plant growth. References to trend charts are listed in Supplement.

附录图1B中趋势图数据来源

Supplement Data sources for trend plots in Fig. 1B

内容 Content	参考文献 Reference
调控时间长度 Duration of conditioning	Dudenhöffer et al., 2018
反馈时间长度 Duration of feedback	Speek et al., 2015
原产地距离 Distance from the origin	Janzen, 1970; Connell, 1971
盐度梯度 Salinity gradient	Jiang et al., 2012
斑块异质性 Pactch hererogeneity	Huang et al., 2023

参考文献 102

[1]	Aguilera AG, Morey S, Gammon M, Jiang M, Ramos S, Kesseli R (2017). Effect of plant-soil feedbacks on the growth and competition of Lactuca species. Plant Ecology, 218, 359-372.
[2]	Aldorfová A, Dostálek T, Münzbergová Z (2022). Effects of soil conditioning, root and shoot litter addition interact to determine the intensity of plant-soil feedback. Oikos, 2022, e09025. DOI: 10.1111/oik.09025.
[3]	Aldorfová A, Knobová P, Münzbergová Z (2020). Plant-soil feedback contributes to predicting plant invasiveness of 68 alien plant species differing in invasive status. Oikos, 129, 1257-1270.
[4]	Arrigoni E, Antonielli L, Pindo M, Pertot I, Perazzolli M (2018). Tissue age and plant genotype affect the microbiota of apple and pear bark. Microbiological Research, 211, 57-68. DOI PMID
[5]	Augspurger CK, Kelly CK (1984). Pathogen mortality of tropical tree seedlings: experimental studies of the effects of dispersal distance, seedling density, and light conditions. Oecologia, 61, 211-217. DOI PMID
[6]	Ba L, Facelli E, Facelli JM (2018). Plant-mycorrhizal fungi feedbacks: potential accomplices of Avena barbata’s high invasiveness. Plant Ecology, 219, 1045-1052.
[7]	Bardgett RD, Wardle D (2010). Aboveground-belowground Linkages: Biotic Interactions, Ecosystem Processes, and Global Change. Oxford University Press, New York.
[8]	Baxendale C, Orwin KH, Poly F, Pommier T, Bardgett RD (2014). Are plant-soil feedback responses explained by plant traits? New Phytologist, 204, 408-423. DOI PMID
[9]	Beals KK, Moore JAM, Kivlin SN, Bayliss SLJ, Lumibao CY, Moorhead LC, Patel M, Summers JL, Ware IM, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA (2020). Predicting plant-soil feedback in the field: meta-analysis reveals that competition and environmental stress differentially influence PSF. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 191. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00191.
[10]	Berendse F (1994). Litter decomposability: a neglected component of plant fitness. Journal of Ecology, 82, 187-190.
[11]	Bergmann J, Verbruggen E, Heinze J, Xiang D, Chen B, Joshi J, Rillig MC (2016). The interplay between soil structure, roots, and microbiota as a determinant of plant-soil feedback. Ecology and Evolution, 6, 7633-7644. DOI PMID
[12]	Bever JD (1994). Feeback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology, 75, 1965-1977.
[13]	Bever JD, Westover KM, Antonovics J (1997). Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. Journal of Ecology, 85, 561-573.
[14]	Bezemer TM, Jing J, Tanja Bakx-Schotman JM, Bijleveld EJ (2018). Plant competition alters the temporal dynamics of plant-soil feedbacks. Journal of Ecology, 106, 2287-2300.
[15]	Brinkman EP, Duyts H, Karssen G, van der Stoel CD, van der Putten WH (2015). Plant-feeding nematodes in coastal sand dunes: occurrence, host specificity and effects on plant growth. Plant and Soil, 397, 17-30.
[16]	Callaway RM, Cipollini D, Barto K, Thelen GC, Hallett SG, Prati D, Stinson K, Klironomos J (2008). Novel weapons: invasive plant suppresses fungal mutualists in America but not in its native Europe. Ecology, 89, 1043-1055. PMID
[17]	Casper BB, Castelli JP (2007). Evaluating plant-soil feedback together with competition in a serpentine grassland. Ecology Letters, 10, 394-400. DOI PMID
[18]	Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Vivanco JM (2014). Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development. The ISME Journal, 8, 790-803.
[19]	Chung YA (2023). The temporal and spatial dimensions of plant-soil feedbacks. New Phytologist, 237, 2012-2019. DOI PMID
[20]	Chung YA, Collins SL, Rudgers JA (2019). Connecting plant-soil feedbacks to long-term stability in a desert grassland. Ecology, 100, e02756. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2756.
[21]	Ciska Veen GF, Fry EL, ten Hooven FC, Kardol P, Morriën E, de Long JR (2019). The role of plant litter in driving plant-soil feedbacks. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7, 168. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00168.
[22]	Connell JH (1971). On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in forest trees//den Boer PJ, Gradwell GR. Dynamics of Populations. Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 298-312.
[23]	Cotrufo MF, Wallenstein MD, Boot CM, Denef K, Paul E (2013). The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: Do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Global Change Biology, 19, 988-995. DOI PMID
[24]	Crawford KM, Knight TM (2017). Competition overwhelms the positive plant-soil feedback generated by an invasive plant. Oecologia, 183, 211-220. DOI PMID
[25]	de Long JR, Heinen R, Hannula SE, Jongen R, Steinauer K, Bezemer TM (2023). Plant-litter-soil feedbacks in common grass species are slightly negative and only marginally modified by litter exposed to insect herbivory. Plant and Soil, 485, 227-244.
[26]	de Souza TAF, de Andrade LA, Freitas H, da Silva Sandim A (2018). Biological invasion influences the outcome of plant-soil feedback in the invasive plant species from the Brazilian semi-arid. Microbial Ecology, 76, 102-112. DOI PMID
[27]	Dinnage R, Simonsen AK, Barrett LG, Cardillo M, Raisbeck-Brown N, Thrall PH, Prober SM (2019). Larger plants promote a greater diversity of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria associated with an Australian endemic legume. Journal of Ecology, 107, 977-991.
[28]	Dobbert S, Pape R, Löffler J (2021). How does spatial heterogeneity affect inter- and intraspecific growth patterns in tundra shrubs? Journal of Ecology, 109, 4115-4131.
[29]	Dong LJ, Ma LN, He WM (2021). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi help explain invasion success of Solidago canadensis. Applied Soil Ecology, 157, 103763. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103763.
[30]	Dudenhöffer JH, Ebeling A, Klein AM, Wagg C (2018). Beyond biomass: soil feedbacks are transient over plant life stages and alter fitness. Journal of Ecology, 106, 230-241.
[31]	Duell EB, Zaiger K, Bever JD, Wilson GWT (2019). Climate affects plant-soil feedback of native and invasive grasses: negative feedbacks in stable but not in variable environments. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 419. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00419.
[32]	Ehrenfeld JG, Ravit B, Elgersma K (2005). Feedback in the plant-soil system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 75-115.
[33]	Eppinga MB, van der Putten WH, Bever JD (2022). Plant-soil feedback as a driver of spatial structure in ecosystems. Physics of Life Reviews, 40, 6-14.
[34]	Fukami T, Nakajima M (2013). Complex plant-soil interactions enhance plant species diversity by delaying community convergence. Journal of Ecology, 101, 316-324.
[35]	Gerdol R, Iacumin P, Brancaleoni L (2019). Differential effects of soil chemistry on the foliar resorption of nitrogen and phosphorus across altitudinal gradients. Functional Ecology, 33, 1351-1361.
[36]	Hassan K, Golam Dastogeer KM, Carrillo Y, Nielsen UN (2022). Climate change driven shifts in plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analysis. Ecological Processes, 11, 64. DOI: 10.1186/s13717-022-00410-z.
[37]	Hawkes CV, Kivlin SN, Du J, Eviner VT (2013). The temporal development and additivity of plant-soil feedback in perennial grasses. Plant and Soil, 369, 141-150.
[38]	Heinen R, Hannula SE, de Long JR, Huberty M, Jongen R, Kielak A, Steinauer K, Zhu F, Bezemer TM (2020). Plant community composition steers grassland vegetation via soil legacy effects. Ecology Letters, 23, 973-982. DOI PMID
[39]	Heinze J, Sitte M, Schindhelm A, Wright J, Joshi J (2016) Plant-soil feedbacks: a comparative study on the relative importance of soil feedbacks in the greenhouse versus the field. Oecologia, 181, 559-569. DOI PMID
[40]	Hendriks M, Ravenek JM, Smit-Tiekstra AE, van der Paauw JW, de Caluwe H, van der Putten WH, de Kroon H, Mommer L (2015a). Spatial heterogeneity of plant-soil feedback affects root interactions and interspecific competition. New Phytologist, 207, 830-840.
[41]	Hendriks M, Visser EJW, Visschers IGS, Aarts BHJ, de Caluwe H, Smit Tiekstra AE, van der Putten WH, de Kroon H, Mommer L (2015b). Root responses of grassland species to spatial heterogeneity of plant-soil feedback. Functional Ecology, 29, 177-186.
[42]	Huang L, Chen RY, Xue W, Yu FH (2023). Effects of scale and contrast of spatial heterogeneity in plant-soil feedbacks on plant growth. Science of the Total Environment, 878, 163159. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163159.
[43]	Huberty M, Choi YH, Heinen R, Bezemer TM (2020). Above- ground plant metabolomic responses to plant-soil feedbacks and herbivory. Journal of Ecology, 108, 1703-1712.
[44]	in’t Zandt D, Herben T, van den Brink A, Visser EJW, de Kroon H (2021). Species abundance fluctuations over 31 years are associated with plant-soil feedback in a species-rich mountain meadow. Journal of Ecology, 109, 1511-1523.
[45]	Janzen DH (1970). Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. The American Naturalist, 104, 501-528.
[46]	Jiang J, de Angelis DL, Smith TJ, Teh SY, Koh HL (2012). Spatial pattern formation of coastal vegetation in response to external gradients and positive feedbacks affecting soil porewater salinity: a model study. Landscape Ecology, 27, 109-119.
[47]	Kardol P, Bezemer TM, van der Putten WH (2006). Temporal variation in plant-soil feedback controls succession. Ecology Letters, 9, 1080-1088. DOI PMID
[48]	Kardol P, de Deyn GB, Laliberté E, Mariotte P, Hawkes CV (2013). Biotic plant-soil feedbacks across temporal scales. Journal of Ecology, 101, 309-315.
[49]	Ke P, Miki T, Ding T (2015). The soil microbial community predicts the importance of plant traits in plant-soil feedback. New Phytologist, 206, 329-341.
[50]	Keller AB, Phillips RP (2019). Leaf litter decay rates differ between mycorrhizal groups in temperate, but not tropical, forests. New Phytologist, 222, 556-564. DOI PMID
[51]	Kivlin SN, Bedoya R, Hawkes CV (2018). Heterogeneity in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities may contribute to inconsistent plant-soil feedback in a Neotropical forest. Plant and Soil, 432, 29-44.
[52]	Klironomos JN (2002). Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature, 417, 67-70.
[53]	Koziol L, Bever JD (2019). Mycorrhizal feedbacks generate positive frequency dependence accelerating grassland succession. Journal of Ecology, 107, 622-632. DOI
[54]	Kulmatiski A, Beard KH, Norton JM, Heavilin JE, Forero LE, Grenzer J (2017). Live long and prosper: plant-soil feedback, lifespan, and landscape abundance covary. Ecology, 98, 3063-3073. DOI PMID
[55]	Kulmatiski A, Beard KH, Stevens JR, Cobbold SM (2008). Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecology Letters, 11, 980-992. DOI PMID
[56]	Laughlin DC, Richardson SJ, Wright EF, Bellingham PJ (2015). Environmental filtering and positive plant litter feedback simultaneously explain correlations between leaf traits and soil fertility. Ecosystems, 18, 1269-1280.
[57]	Lepinay C, Vondráková Z, Dostálek T, Münzbergová Z (2018). Duration of the conditioning phase affects the results of plant-soil feedback experiments via soil chemical properties. Oecologia, 186, 459-470. DOI PMID
[58]	Li PD, Zhu ZR, Zhang YZ, Xu JP, Wang HK, Wang ZY, Li HY (2022). The phyllosphere microbiome shifts toward combating melanose pathogen. Microbiome, 10, 56. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-022-01234-x.
[59]	Li YM, Wang SJ, Lu M, Zhang Z, Chen MK, Li SH, Cao R (2019). Rhizosphere interactions between earthworms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase nutrient availability and plant growth in the desertification soils. Soil and Tillage Research, 186, 146-151.
[60]	Manrubia M, van der Putten WH, Weser C, Ciska Veen GF (2020). Rhizosphere and litter feedbacks to range- expanding plant species and related natives. Journal of Ecology, 108, 353-365. DOI PMID
[61]	Mariotte P, Mehrabi Z, Bezemer TM, de Deyn GB, Kulmatiski A, Drigo B, Ciska Veen GF, van der Heijden MGA, Kardol P (2018). Plant-soil feedback: bridging natural and agricultural sciences. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 33, 129-142.
[62]	Pausch J, Kuzyakov Y (2018). Carbon input by roots into the soil: quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale. Global Change Biology, 24, 1-12. DOI PMID
[63]	Pernilla BE, van der Putten WH, Bakker EJ, Verhoeven KJF (2010). Plant-soil feedback: experimental approaches, statistical analyses and ecological interpretations. Journal of Ecology, 98, 1063-1073.
[64]	Reinhart KO, Packer A, van der Putten WH, Clay K (2003). Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecology Letters, 6, 1046-1050.
[65]	Reinhart KO, Tytgat T, van der Putten WH, Clay K (2010). Virulence of soil-borne pathogens and invasion by Prunus serotina. New Phytologist, 186, 484-495. DOI PMID
[66]	Roy-Bolduc A, Laliberté E, Boudreau S, Hijri M (2016). Strong linkage between plant and soil fungal communities along a successional coastal dune system. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92, fiw156. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw156.
[67]	Sedlacek JF, Bossdorf O, Cortés AJ, Wheeler JA, van Kleunen M (2014). What role do plant-soil interactions play in the habitat suitability and potential range expansion of the alpine dwarf shrub Salix herbacea? Basic and Applied Ecology, 15, 305-315.
[68]	Shannon SM, Bauer JT, Anderson WE, Reynolds HL (2014). Plant-soil feedbacks between invasive shrubs and native forest understory species lead to shifts in the abundance of mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil, 382, 317-328.
[69]	She YD, Ma T, Zhou HK, Li HL, Zhang ZH, Ma L, Qin RM, Su HY, Chang T, Wei JJ, Hu X (2023). Characterization of the plant-soil feedback index in alpine meadow degradation and recovery: a field experiment. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1097030. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1097030.
[70]	Šmilauerová M (2001). Plant root response to heterogeneity of soil resources: effects of nutrient patches, AM symbiosis, and species composition. Folia Geobotanica, 36, 337-351.
[71]	Smith DJB (2022). The functional form of specialised predation affects whether Janzen-Connell effects can prevent competitive exclusion. Ecology Letters, 25, 1458-1470. DOI PMID
[72]	Smith-Ramesh LM, Reynolds HL (2017). The next frontier of plant-soil feedback research: unraveling context dependence across biotic and abiotic gradients. Journal of Vegetation Science, 28, 484-494.
[73]	Song X, Corlett RT (2022). Do natural enemies mediate conspecific negative distance- and density-dependence of trees? A meta-analysis of exclusion experiments. Oikos, 2022, e08509. DOI: 10.1111/oik.08509.
[74]	Speek TAA, Schaminée JHJ, Stam JM, Lotz LAP, Ozinga WA, van der Putten WH (2015). Local dominance of exotic plants declines with residence time: a role for plant-soil feedback? AoB PLANTS, 7, plv021. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv021.
[75]	Steinauer K, Thakur MP, Emilia Hannula S, Weinhold A, Uthe H, van Dam NM, Martijn Bezemer T (2023). Root exudates and rhizosphere microbiomes jointly determine temporal shifts in plant-soil feedbacks. Plant, Cell & Environment, 46, 1885-1899.
[76]	Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Hallett SG, Prati D, Klironomos JN (2006). Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biology, 4, e140. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001817.
[77]	Teste FP, Kardol P, Turner BL, Wardle DA, Zemunik G, Renton M, Laliberté E (2017). Plant-soil feedback and the maintenance of diversity in Mediterranean-climate shrublands. Science, 355, 173-176. DOI PMID
[78]	Thakur MP, van der Putten WH, Wilschut RA, Ciska Veen GF, Kardol P, van Ruijven J, Allan E, Roscher C, van Kleunen M, Bezemer TM (2021). Plant-soil feedbacks and temporal dynamics of plant diversity-productivity relationships. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36, 651-661.
[79]	Tian B, Pei Y, Huang W, Ding J, Siemann E (2021). Increasing flavonoid concentrations in root exudates enhance associations between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and an invasive plant. The ISME Journal, 15, 1919-1930.
[80]	Valliere JM, Allen EB (2016). Interactive effects of nitrogen deposition and drought-stress on plant-soil feedbacks of Artemisia californica seedlings. Plant and Soil, 403, 277-290.
[81]	van der Putten WH (2003). Plant defense belowground and spatiotemporal processes in natural vegetation. Ecology, 84, 2269-2280.
[82]	van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, Bever JD, Bezemer TM, Casper BB, Fukami T, Kardol P, Klironomos JN, Kulmatiski A, Schweitzer JA, Suding KN, van de Voorde TFJ, Wardle DA (2013). Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. Journal of Ecology, 101, 265-276.
[83]	van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM, Tamis WLM, Berendse F, Veenendaal EM (2007). Reduced plant-soil feedback of plant species expanding their range as compared to natives. Journal of Ecology, 95, 1050-1057.
[84]	van Wyk DAB, Adeleke R, Rhode OHJ, Bezuidenhout CC, Mienie C (2017). Ecological guild and enzyme activities of rhizosphere soil microbial communities associated with Bt-maize cultivation under field conditions in North West Province of South Africa. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 57, 781-792. DOI PMID
[85]	Vindušková O, Deckmyn G, Bortier M, De Boeck HJ, Liu Y, Nijs I (2023). Combined effects of soil 3D spatial heterogeneity and biotic spatial heterogeneity (plant clumping) on ecosystem processes in grasslands. Ecology and Evolution, 13, e10604. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10604.
[86]	Wang HR, Zhang JM, Zhao XY, Feng FJ (2022). N limit as a switch node between positive and negative plant-soil feedback: a meta-analysis based on the covariant diagnosis of plant growth and soil factors. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 237, 113557. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113557.
[87]	Wang R, Wang X, Jiang Y, Cerdà A, Yin J, Liu H, Feng X, Shi Z, Dijkstra FA, Li M (2017). Soil properties determine the elevational patterns of base cations and micronutrients in plant-soil system up to the upper limits of trees and shrubs. Biogeosciences, 15, 1763-1774.
[88]	Wang SJ (2020). Key ecological issues in plant-soil feedback: pattern, process and mechanism. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 44(2), 1-9.
	[王邵军 (2020). “植物-土壤”相互反馈的关键生态学问题: 格局、过程与机制. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 44(2), 1-9.] DOI
[89]	Wubs ERJ, Bezemer TM (2016). Effects of spatial plant-soil feedback heterogeneity on plant performance in monocultures. Journal of Ecology, 104, 364-376.
[90]	Wubs ERJ, Bezemer TM (2018). Plant community evenness responds to spatial plant-soil feedback heterogeneity primarily through the diversity of soil conditioning. Functional Ecology, 32, 509-521.
[91]	Xi N, McCarthy-Neumann S, Feng J, Wu H, Wang W, Semchenko M (2023). Light availability and plant shade tolerance modify plant-microbial interactions and feedbacks in subtropical trees. New Phytologist, 238, 393-404.
[92]	Xi NX, Zhang YY, Zhou SR (2023). Plant-soil feedbacks in community ecology. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 47, 170-182.
	[席念勋, 张原野, 周淑荣 (2023). 群落生态学中的植物-土壤反馈研究. 植物生态学报, 47, 170-182.] DOI
[93]	Xiao L, Liu GB, Li P, Xue S (2019a). Direct and indirect effects of elevated CO₂and nitrogen addition on soil microbial communities in the rhizosphere of Bothriochloa ischaemum. Journal of Soils Sediments, 19, 3679-3687.
[94]	Xiao S, Atwater DZ, Callaway RM (2019b). Integrating spatial structure and interspecific and intraspecific plant-soil feedback effects and responses into community structure. Oikos, 128, 1296-1306.
[95]	Xue W, Berendse F, Bezemer TM (2018). Spatial heterogeneity in plant-soil feedbacks alters competitive interactions between two grassland plant species. Functional Ecology, 32, 2085-2094.
[96]	Yang Q, Carrillo J, Jin H, Shang L, Hovick SM, Nijjer S, Gabler CA, Li B, Siemann E (2013). Plant-soil biota interactions of an invasive species in its native and introduced ranges: implications for invasion success. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 65, 78-85.
[97]	Yang Q, Wei S, Shang L, Carrillo J, Gabler CA, Nijjer S, Li B, Siemann E (2015). Mycorrhizal associations of an invasive tree are enhanced by both genetic and environmental mechanisms. Ecography, 38, 1112-1118.
[98]	Yu H, He Y, Zhang W, Chen L, Zhang J, Zhang X, Dawson W, Ding J (2022). Greater chemical signaling in root exudates enhances soil mutualistic associations in invasive plants compared to natives. New Phytologist, 236, 1140-1153.
[99]	Zhang F, Wang H, Alatalo JM, Bai Y, Fang Z, Liu G, Yang Y, Zhi Y, Yang S (2023). Spatial heterogeneity analysis of matching degree between endangered plant diversity and ecosystem services in Xishuangbanna. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 96891-96905.
[100]	Zhang J, Klinkhamer PGL, Vrieling K, Bezemer TM (2022). The negative effects of soil microorganisms on plant growth only extend to the first weeks. Journal of Plant Ecology, 15, 854-863. DOI
[101]	Zhang N, van der Putten WH, Ciska Veen GF (2016). Effects of root decomposition on plant-soil feedback of early- and mid-successional plant species. New Phytologist, 212, 220-231. DOI PMID
[102]	Zhao RJ, Chen T, Dong LJ, Guo H, Ma HK, Song X, Wang MG, Xue W, Yang Q (2023). Progress of plant-soil feedback in ecology studies. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 47, 1333-1355.
	[赵榕江, 陈焘, 董丽佳, 郭辉, 马海鲲, 宋旭, 王明刚, 薛伟, 杨强 (2023). 植物-土壤反馈及其在生态学中的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 47, 1333-1355.] DOI

植物-土壤反馈时空变异研究进展

Research progress on spatial-temporal variation of plant-soil feedback

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 102

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	廖苏慧倪隆康秦佳双谭羽顾大形. 中亚热带喀斯特森林不同演替阶段树种水力调节策略差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 0-0.
[2]	席念勋, 张原野, 周淑荣. 群落生态学中的植物-土壤反馈研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 170-182.
[3]	赵榕江, 陈焘, 董丽佳, 郭辉, 马海鲲, 宋旭, 王明刚, 薛伟, 杨强. 植物-土壤反馈及其在生态学中的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1333-1355.
[4]	赵长兴, 赵维俊, 张兴林, 刘思敏, 牟文博, 刘金荣. 祁连山排露沟流域青海云杉种群种内竞争与促进作用分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1027-1037.
[5]	秦江环, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 基于温带针阔混交林植物-土壤反馈的Janzen- Connell假说检验[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 624-631.
[6]	陈世苹, 游翠海, 胡中民, 陈智, 张雷明, 王秋凤. 涡度相关技术及其在陆地生态系统通量研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(4): 291-304.
[7]	唐金琦, 郭小城, 鲁新瑜, 刘明超, 张海艳, 冯玉龙, 孔德良. 外来入侵植物对本地植物菌根真菌的影响及其机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(11): 1095-1112.
[8]	韦博良, 袁志良, 牛帅, 刘霞, 贾宏汝, 叶永忠. 河南省宝天曼锐齿槲栎林树木死亡对空间格局及种间相关性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(4): 430-438.
[9]	王雪梅, 闫帮国, 赵广, 史亮涛, 刘刚才, 方海东. 云南元谋不同海拔土壤微生物对车桑子碳、氮、磷化学计量特征及土壤特性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(3): 311-324.
[10]	葛结林, 熊高明, 李家湘, 徐文婷, 赵常明, 卢志军, 李跃林, 谢宗强. 中国南方灌丛凋落物现存量[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(1): 5-13.
[11]	张炜平,潘莎,贾昕,储诚进,肖洒,林玥,白燕远,王根轩. 植物间正相互作用对种群动态和群落结构的影响: 基于个体模型的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(6): 571-582.
[12]	黄运峰,路兴慧,臧润国,丁易,龙文兴,王进强,杨民,黄运天. 海南岛热带低地雨林刀耕火种弃耕地自然恢复过程中的群落构建[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(5): 415-426.
[13]	徐丽,于书霞,何念鹏,温学发,石培礼,张扬建,代景忠,王若梦. 青藏高原高寒草地土壤碳矿化及其温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(11): 988-997.
[14]	黄运峰,丁易,臧润国,李小成,邹正冲,韩文涛. 海南岛霸王岭热带低地雨林树木的空间格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 269-280.
[15]	宋同清, 彭晚霞, 曾馥平, 王克林, 覃文更, 谭卫宁, 刘璐, 杜虎, 鹿士杨. 木论喀斯特峰丛洼地森林群落空间格局及环境解释[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(3): 298-308.