祁连山排露沟流域青海云杉种群种内竞争与促进作用分析

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2022.0086

植物生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 1027-1037.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0086

祁连山排露沟流域青海云杉种群种内竞争与促进作用分析

赵长兴¹^,², 赵维俊³, 张兴林⁴, 刘思敏⁵, 牟文博¹^,⁶, 刘金荣¹^,²^,^*()

¹兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室, 兰州 730020
²兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 草地农业教育部工程研究中心, 甘肃省西部草业技术创新中心, 兰州 730020
³甘肃省祁连山水源涵养林研究院, 甘肃张掖 734099
⁴甘肃省生态环境科学设计研究院, 兰州 730030
⁵国家林业和草原局, 北京 100714
⁶兰州大学生态学院, 兰州 730000

收稿日期:2022-03-07 接受日期:2022-05-13 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-10-19
通讯作者: 刘金荣
作者简介:* (liujinr@lzu.edu.cn)
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32060247)

Analyses of intraspecific competition and facilitation of Picea crassifolia in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains, China

ZHAO Chang-Xing¹^,², ZHAO Wei-Jun³, ZHANG Xing-Lin⁴, LIU Si-Min⁵, MOU Wen-Bo¹^,⁶, LIU Jin-Rong¹^,²^,^*()

¹State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020
²College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education, Gansu Tech Innovation Center of Western China Grassland Industry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
³Academy of Water Resources Conservation Forests in Qilian Mountains of Gansu Province, Zhangye, Gansu 734099, China
⁴Gansu Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences, Lanzhou 730030, China
⁵National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100714, China
⁶College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2022-03-07 Accepted:2022-05-13 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-10-19
Contact: LIU Jin-Rong
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32060247)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探索种群的空间分布格局及其相互作用有助于阐释种群结构构建过程和空间分布维持机制中的潜在驱动因素, 进而为森林生态系统内不同种群的配置、经营与管理提供指导, 也为当地生态环境保护和区域资源开发提供科学依据。该研究以青海云杉(Picea crassifolia)为研究对象, 在祁连山排露沟流域设置3个面积为1 hm²的重复样地, 对样地内所有胸径≥1 cm的树木个体进行测量记录。采用成对相关函数(单变量成对相关函数g(r)和双变量成对相关函数g₁₂(r))和标记相关函数(标记相关函数K_mm(r)、标记变异函数γ_m(r)和Schlather’s I_m(r)函数)等点格局分析方法分析青海云杉种群的空间格局及种内相互作用。发现: (1)青海云杉种群径级分布连续, 整体呈倒“J”形结构。(2)青海云杉整体及幼树、小树呈现出小尺度上的聚集分布, 随空间尺度的增大逐渐趋于随机分布, 中树在整个观察尺度内均为随机分布模式, 大树则表现为小尺度上的均匀分布和大尺度上的随机分布。(3)青海云杉大树在小尺度范围内与其他径级个体均呈现出负关联, 在中尺度上呈现出正关联, 中树与小树、小树与幼树在小中尺度上表现为显著的正相关关系且随着空间尺度的增大逐渐转变为不相关。(4)青海云杉个体属性(胸径、树高、树冠面积)间在小中尺度上呈现出高度的相关性、强烈的抑制作用和显著的对称性竞争。

关键词: 青海云杉, 空间格局, 种内相互作用, 竞争, 促进, 点格局分析

Abstract:

Aims Exploring the spatial distribution patterns and interactions of populations can help elucidate the underlying driving factors in population structure construction and the maintenance mechanism of spatial distribution. It guides the allocation, and management of different populations in the forest ecosystems, and also provides a scientific basis for local ecological environment protection and regional resource development.

Methods In this study, Picea crassifolia was selected as the research object. Three repeated plots with an area of 1 hm² were set up in the Pailugou Watershed of the Qilian Mountains, and all individual trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥1 cm were measured and recorded. The spatial patterns and intraspecific interactions of Picea crassifolia were analyzed by using a pair-correlation function (univariate and bivariate pair-correlation function) and mark correlation function (marked correlation function, marked variogram function, and Schlather’s I(r) function).

Important findings (1) The diameter class distribution of P. crassifolia population was continuous, with an inverted “J” type structure. (2) Picea crassifolia as a whole, saplings, and young trees showed a small-scale aggregation distribution, and gradually tended to random distribution with the increase of spatial scale. Medium trees showed a random distribution pattern on the whole observation scale, while large trees showed a regular distribution on the small scale and random distribution on the large scale. (3) Large trees of P. crassifolia showed small-scale negative correlations with other size class individuals and middle-scale positive correlations. There were strong positive correlations between medium and young trees, and between sapling and young trees at a small to medium scale, and they gradually changed to no correlation with the increase of spatial scale. (4) Individual characteristics of P. crassifolia showed high correlations, strong inhibitions, and significant symmetry competitions on a small to medium scale.

Key words: Picea crassifolia, spatial pattern, intraspecific interaction, competition, facilitation, point pattern analysis

赵长兴, 赵维俊, 张兴林, 刘思敏, 牟文博, 刘金荣. 祁连山排露沟流域青海云杉种群种内竞争与促进作用分析. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1027-1037. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0086

ZHAO Chang-Xing, ZHAO Wei-Jun, ZHANG Xing-Lin, LIU Si-Min, MOU Wen-Bo, LIU Jin-Rong. Analyses of intraspecific competition and facilitation of Picea crassifolia in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(9): 1027-1037. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0086

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2022.0086

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2022/V46/I9/1027

图/表 5

表1 祁连山排露沟流域内样地基本信息

Table 1 Information of sample plots in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains, China

样地 Plot	经度 Longitude (° E)	纬度 Latitude (° N)	海拔 Altitude (m)	坡度 Slope (°)	坡向 Exposure	密度 Density (No.·hm^-2)
1	100.29	38.55	2 793	13.5	东北 Northeast	1 586
2	100.30	38.54	2 810	25.0	北 North	1 901
3	100.29	38.55	2 836	28.0	北 North	2 607

图1 祁连山排露沟流域内青海云杉种群的径级结构。

Fig. 1 Diameter class structure of Picea crassifolia in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains, China.

图2 祁连山排露沟流域内不同径级青海云杉的空间分布格局。g(r), 单变量成对相关函数。

Fig. 2 Spatial distribution patterns of different diameter classes of Picea crassifolia in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains, China. g(r), the univariate pair-correlation function.

图3 祁连山排露沟流域内不同径级青海云杉个体间的空间关联性。g12(r), 双变量成对相关函数。

Fig. 3 Spatial correlations of different diameter classes of Picea crassifolia in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains, China. g12(r), the bivariate pair-correlation function.

图4 祁连山排露沟流域内青海云杉种群不同个体属性间的标记相关函数分析。Im(r), Schlather’s Im(r)函数; Kmm(r), 标记相关函数; γm(r), 标记变异函数。

Fig. 4 Mark correlation function analysis between individual characteristics of Picea crassifolia in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains, China. Im(r), Schlather’s Im(r) function; Kmm(r), marked correlation function; γm(r), marked variogram function.

参考文献 40

[1]	Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994). Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 191-193. DOI URL
[2]	Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Paolini L, Pugnaire FI, Newingham B, Aschehoug ET, Armas C, Kikodze D, Cook BJ (2002). Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature, 417, 841-844. DOI URL
[3]	Chen BB, Kuang WN, Jiang J, Zhao XH, He HJ (2021). Spatial distribution of dominant regeneration seedlings and environmental interpretations of secondary poplar-birch forest in Changbai Mountains, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 4469-4475.
	[陈贝贝, 匡文浓, 姜俊, 赵秀海, 何怀江 (2021). 长白山次生杨桦林优势更新幼苗空间分布及环境解释. 生态学报, 41, 4469-4475.]
[4]	Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Itoh A, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Manokaran N, Sukumar R, Yamakura T (2000). Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science, 288, 1414-1418. DOI URL
[5]	Connell JH (1971). On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. Dynamics of Populations, 298-312.
[6]	Erfanifard Y, Nguyen HH, Schmidt JP, Rayburn A (2018). Fine-scale intraspecific interactions and environmental heterogeneity drive the spatial structure in old-growth stands of a dioecious plant. Forest Ecology and Management, 425, 92-99. DOI URL
[7]	Erfanifard Y, Stereńczak K, Miścicki S (2019). Management strategies alter competitive interactions and structural properties of Norway spruce in mixed stands of Bialowieża Forest, Poland. Forest Ecology and Management, 437, 87-98. DOI
[8]	Feng XY, Lin PF, Zhao WZ (2022). The physiological constraints of alpine treeline in Qilian Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, 503, 119761. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119761. DOI
[9]	Ge HY, Wang HY, Wei W, Zhao CY (2018). Spatial distribution of Picea crassifolia population and relationships between the species ages. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 54, 467-471.
	[葛红元, 王红义, 韦炜, 赵传燕 (2018). 青海云杉种群空间分布特征及不同林龄相互关系. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 54, 467-471.]
[10]	Getzin S, Wiegand T, Wiegand K, He FL (2008). Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands. Journal of Ecology, 96, 807-820. DOI URL
[11]	Graff P, Aguiar MR (2011). Testing the role of biotic stress in the stress gradient hypothesis. Processes and patterns in arid rangelands. Oikos, 120, 1023-1030. DOI URL
[12]	Han H, Luo M, Li T, Wei XL (2021). Natural population characteristics, spatial distribution pattern and spatial correlation analysis of Phoebe bournei in Guizhou Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 5360-5367.
	[韩豪, 骆漫, 李涛, 韦小丽 (2021). 贵州闽楠天然种群特征、空间分布格局及空间关联分析. 生态学报, 41, 5360-5367.]
[13]	Huang PN (2014). Effect of autotoxicity of extract liquid of Picea crassifolia litter or hizosphere soil on seed germination. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, (2), 10-13.
	[黄浦娜 (2014). 青海云杉根际土壤及凋落物浸提液对种子萌发的自毒作用. 陕西林业科技, (2), 10-13.]
[14]	Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008). Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns. Wiley, London.
[15]	Janzen DH (1970). Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. The American Naturalist, 104, 501-528. DOI URL
[16]	Li HD, Shen WS, Fang Y, Yan SG, Zhang H, Zhao W (2011). Point pattern analysis of several psammophyte populations in the riparian ecotone in the middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo River of Tibet, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 834-843. DOI URL
	[李海东, 沈渭寿, 方颖, 燕守广, 张慧, 赵卫 (2011). 雅鲁藏布江中游河岸带几种主要沙生植物种群点格局分析. 植物生态学报, 35, 834-843.] DOI
[17]	Li L, Chen JH, Ren HB, Mi XC, Yu MJ, Yang B (2010). Spatial patterns of Castanopsis eyrei and Schima superba in mid-subtropical broad-leaved evergreen forest in Gutianshan National Reserve, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 241-252.
	[李立, 陈建华, 任海保, 米湘成, 于明坚, 杨波 (2010). 古田山常绿阔叶林优势树种甜槠和木荷的空间格局分析. 植物生态学报, 34, 241-252.] DOI
[18]	Liu J, Bai XJ, Yin Y, Wang WG, Li ZQ, Ma PY (2021). Spatial patterns and associations of tree species at different developmental stages in a montane secondary temperate forest of northeastern China. PeerJ, 9, 11517. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11517. DOI
[19]	Liu PC, Wang WD, Bai ZQ, Guo ZJ, Ren W, Huang JH, Xu Y, Yao J, Ding Y, Zang RG (2020). Competition and facilitation co-regulate the spatial patterns of boreal tree species in Kanas of Xinjiang, northwest China. Forest Ecology and Management, 467, 118167. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118167. DOI
[20]	Meng LJ, Yao J, Qin JH, Fan CY, Zhang CY, Zhao XH (2018). Drivers of composition and density pattern of tree seedlings in a secondary mixed conifer and broad-leaved forest, Jiaohe, Jilin, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 42, 653-662. DOI URL
	[孟令君, 姚杰, 秦江环, 范春雨, 张春雨, 赵秀海 (2018). 吉林蛟河针阔混交林乔木幼苗组成及其密度格局影响因素. 植物生态学报, 42, 653-662.] DOI
[21]	Pacala SW (1997). Dynamics of plant communities//Crawley MJ. Plant Ecology. 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford. 532-555.
[22]	Parker IM, Saunders M, Bontrager M, Weitz AP, Hendricks R, Magarey R, Suiter K, Gilbert GS (2015). Phylogenetic structure and host abundance drive disease pressure in communities. Nature, 520, 542-544. DOI URL
[23]	Qi YJ, Zhang GQ, Luo GL, Yang TL, Wu QC (2021). Community-level consequences of harsh environmental constraints based on spatial patterns analysis in karst primary forest of southwest China. Forest Ecology and Management, 488, 119021. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119021. DOI
[24]	Ren YH, Zhou YZ, Hou L, Fang JP, Luo DQ (2021). Spatial distribution patterns of standing trees at different ages in Abies georgei var. smithii forests in Sejila Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 5417-5424.
	[任毅华, 周尧治, 侯磊, 方江平, 罗大庆 (2021). 色季拉山急尖长苞冷杉种群不同龄级立木的空间分布格局. 生态学报, 41, 5417-5424.]
[25]	Searle EB, Chen HYH (2020). Complementarity effects are strengthened by competition intensity and global environmental change in the central boreal forests of Canada. Ecology Letters, 23, 79-87.
[26]	Shen ZQ, Hua M, Dan Q, Lu J, Fang JP (2016). Spatial pattern analysis and associations of Quercus aquifolioides population at different growth stages in Southeast Tibet, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 387-394.
	[沈志强, 华敏, 丹曲, 卢杰, 方江平 (2016). 藏东南川滇高山栎种群不同生长阶段的空间格局与关联性. 应用生态学报, 27, 387-394.]
[27]	Ta F, Liu XD, Liu RH, Zhao WJ, Jing WM, Ma J, Wu XR, Zhao JZ, Ma XE (2020). Spatial distribution patterns and association of Picea crassifolia population in Dayekou Basin of Qilian Mountains, northwestern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44, 1172-1183. DOI URL
	[拓锋, 刘贤德, 刘润红, 赵维俊, 敬文茂, 马剑, 武秀荣, 赵晶忠, 马雪娥 (2020). 祁连山大野口流域青海云杉种群空间格局及其关联性. 植物生态学报, 44, 1172-1183.]
[28]	Tu HR, Li JF, Liu RH, Liang SC, Lan ZN, Zhang XY, Kang XD, Jiang Y (2019). Spatial distribution patterns and association of Loropetalum chinense population in karst hills of Guilin, Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 2621-2630.
	[涂洪润, 李娇凤, 刘润红, 梁士楚, 兰泽南, 章欣仪, 康馨丹, 姜勇 (2019). 桂林岩溶石山檵木种群空间格局及其关联性. 应用生态学报, 30, 2621-2630.] DOI
[29]	Wang LH, Zhao DP, Chen GL (2017). Autotoxicity of litters from Picea crassifolia on its seed germination and seedling growth. Molecular Plant Breeding, 15, 4275-4281.
	[王丽红, 赵东平, 陈贵林 (2017). 青海云杉凋落物对种子萌发和幼苗生长的自毒作用. 分子植物育种, 15, 4275-4281.]
[30]	Wang QT, Zhao CY, Gao CC, Xie HH, Qiao Y, Gao YF, Yuan LM, Wang WB, Ge LJ, Zhang GD (2017). Effects of environmental variables on seedling-sapling distribution of Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) along altitudinal gradients. Forest Ecology and Management, 384, 54-64. DOI URL
[31]	Wang XG, Ye J, Li BH, Zhang J, Lin F, Hao ZQ (2010). Spatial distributions of species in an old-growth temperate forest, northeastern China. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40, 1011-1019. DOI URL
[32]	Wang XT, Zhang WH, Jiang C, Liang CZ (2017). Point pattern analysis under conditions of replicated sampling. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41, 577-584. DOI URL
	[王鑫厅, 张维华, 姜超, 梁存柱 (2017). 重复取样条件下的点格局分析. 植物生态学报, 41, 577-584.] DOI
[33]	Wiegand T, Moloney KA (2004). Rings, circles, and null- models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos, 104, 209-229. DOI URL
[34]	Wiegand T, Moloney KA (2014). Handbook of Spatial Point- pattern Analysis in Ecology. CRC Press, Florida.
[35]	Zhang H, Feng Y, Guan W, Cao X, Li Z, Ding J (2021). Using unmanned aerial vehicles to quantify spatial patterns of dominant vegetation along an elevation gradient in the typical Gobi region in Xinjiang, Northwest China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 27, e01571. DOI: 10.1016/j. gecco.2021.e01571. DOI
[36]	Zhang HN, Zhou DQ, Qian ZD, Chen H, Cao X, Liang S, Liu BY, Gao J (2022). Spatial distribution pattern and competitive symmetry of dominant species in Musa sp. community in the hot and humid river valley. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42, 2853-2864.
	[张昊楠, 周大庆, 钱者东, 陈皓, 曹晓, 梁盛, 刘邦友, 高军 (2022). 湿热河谷芭蕉群落优势物种空间分布格局与竞争对称性研究. 生态学报, 42, 2853-2864.]
[37]	Zhao GD, Xiong K, Xu GX, Ma FQ, Yang HG, Liu S, Shi ZM, Chen J, Zhang Y (2022). Spatial patterns and associations of main dominant species Ahir fargesii var. fasosiane and Betule utilis in Miyaluo subalpine dark coniderous forest of western Sichuan, China, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42, 3377-3388.
	[赵广东, 熊凯, 许格希, 马凡强, 杨洪国, 刘顺, 史作民, 陈健, 张运 (2022). 川西米亚罗亚高山暗针叶林岷江冷杉和糙皮桦空间格局及其关联性分析. 生态学报, 42, 3377-3388.]
[38]	Zhao JH, Ye YQ, Sun XD, Lan WJ, Fang Y, Chen B, Guan QW (2022). Population dynamics and spatial distribution of the rare and endangered plant Tsuga chinensis var. tchekiangensis in Wuyishan, Jiangxi Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42, 4032-4040.
	[赵家豪, 叶钰倩, 孙晓丹, 兰文军, 方毅, 陈斌, 关庆伟 (2022). 江西武夷山珍稀濒危植物南方铁杉种群动态与空间分布. 生态学报, 42, 4032-4040.]
[39]	Zhao LQ, Huang HG, Liang DS, Zhang XL (2010). Spatial distribution pattern of Picea crassifolia population in Dayekou, Gansu Province. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 32(4), 59-64.
	[赵丽琼, 黄华国, 梁大双, 张晓丽 (2010). 甘肃大野口青海云杉种群的空间分布格局. 北京林业大学学报, 32(4), 59-64.]
[40]	Zhao WJ, Wang SL, Meng HJ, Ma J, Niu Y (2018). Population structure and spatial distribution pattern of Picea crassifolia in Pailugou basin, Qilian mountains. Journal of the Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 38(11), 75-80.
	[赵维俊, 王顺利, 孟好军, 马剑, 牛赟 (2018). 祁连山排露沟流域青海云杉种群结构与空间分布格局. 中南林业科技大学学报, 38(11), 75-80.]

祁连山排露沟流域青海云杉种群种内竞争与促进作用分析

Analyses of intraspecific competition and facilitation of Picea crassifolia in Pailugou Watershed of Qilian Mountains, China

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	冉松松, 余再鹏, 万晓华, 傅彦榕, 邹秉章, 王思荣, 黄志群. 邻域树种多样性对杉木叶片氮磷生态化学计量比的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 932-942.
[2]	张增可, 李曾燕, 杨柏钰, 赛碧乐, 杨安娜, 张立, 牟凌, 郑俊勇, 金乐薇, 赵钊, 王万胜, 杜运才, 阎恩荣. 上海大金山岛常见木本植物功能性状对生长和死亡的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1398-1406.
[3]	史欢欢, 雪穷, 于振林, 汪承焕. 密度、物种比例对盐沼植物种子萌发阶段种内、种间相互作用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 77-87.
[4]	樊凡, 赵联军, 马添翼, 熊心雨, 张远彬, 申小莉, 李晟. 川西王朗亚高山暗针叶林25.2 hm²动态监测样地物种组成与群落结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1005-1017.
[5]	柳牧青, 杨小凤, 石钰铭, 刘雨薇, 李小蒙, 廖万金. 模拟酸雨对入侵植物豚草与伴生种鬼针草竞争关系的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 932-940.
[6]	秦慧君, 焦亮, 周怡, 薛儒鸿, 柒常亮, 杜达石. 祁连山优势树木碳水化合物资源分配的海拔和树种效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 208-219.
[7]	崔光帅, 罗天祥, 梁尔源, 张林. 干旱半干旱区灌丛对草本植物的促进作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1321-1333.
[8]	杜军, 王文, 何志斌, 陈龙飞, 蔺鹏飞, 朱喜, 田全彦. 祁连山青海云杉物候表型的空间分异及其内在机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 834-843.
[9]	姜鑫, 牛克昌. 青藏高原禾草混播对土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(5): 539-551.
[10]	谭一波, 田红灯, 曾春阳, 沈浩, 申文辉, 叶建平, 甘国娟. 猫儿山铁杉相邻植株冠层机械磨损对枝叶性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1281-1291.
[11]	庞芳, 夏维康, 何敏, 祁珊珊, 戴志聪, 杜道林. 固氮菌缓解氮限制环境中丛枝菌根真菌对加拿大一枝黄花的营养竞争[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(7): 782-790.
[12]	陈世苹, 游翠海, 胡中民, 陈智, 张雷明, 王秋凤. 涡度相关技术及其在陆地生态系统通量研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(4): 291-304.
[13]	康剑, 梁寒雪, 蒋少伟, 朱火星, 周鹏, 黄建国. 竞争和气候对新疆阿尔泰山西伯利亚五针松树木径向生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(12): 1195-1202.
[14]	拓锋, 刘贤德, 刘润红, 赵维俊, 敬文茂, 马剑, 武秀荣, 赵晶忠, 马雪娥. 祁连山大野口流域青海云杉种群空间格局及其关联性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(11): 1172-1183.
[15]	杨军军, 封建民, 何志斌. 基于热比率法的青海云杉林蒸腾量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(2): 195-201.