丛枝菌根真菌提高入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊对除草剂的耐受性

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2023.0383

植物生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 651-659.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0383 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2023.0383

所属专题：入侵生态学；菌根真菌

丛枝菌根真菌提高入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊对除草剂的耐受性

胡蝶¹, 蒋欣琪¹, 戴志聪², 陈戴一¹, 张雨¹, 祁珊珊¹^,^*(), 杜道林³

¹江苏大学农业工程学院, 江苏镇江 212013
²江苏大学环境与安全工程学院, 环境生态研究所, 江苏镇江 212013
³江苏大学京江学院, 江苏镇江 212013

收稿日期:2023-12-21 接受日期:2024-02-06 出版日期:2024-05-20 发布日期:2024-02-26
通讯作者: *(qishanshan1986120@163.com)
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32171509);国家自然科学基金(32271587);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20211321)

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance the capacity of invasive Sphagneticola trilobata to tolerate herbicides

HU Die¹, JIANG Xin-Qi¹, DAI Zhi-Cong², CHEN Dai-Yi¹, ZHANG Yu¹, QI Shan-Shan¹^,^*(), DU Dao-Lin³

¹School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China
²School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Institute of Environment and Ecology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China
³Jingjiang College, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China

Received:2023-12-21 Accepted:2024-02-06 Online:2024-05-20 Published:2024-02-26
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32171509);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32271587);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20211321)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊(Sphagneticola trilobata)的优势生长严重危害本土植物群落和生态系统的稳定性。近年来, 化学防治依然是最主要的杂草防控手段。丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)作为一种菌根共生体, 在宿主植物的生长和抵抗外界环境胁迫中起到重要的作用。该研究通过温室控制实验设置4种处理方式: 对照组、只接种AMF、只喷施除草剂以及喷施除草剂并接种AMF, 以验证AMF是否在入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊响应除草剂中起到重要作用。结果显示: 在草甘膦铵盐除草剂的胁迫下, 南美蟛蜞菊的菌根侵染率、泡囊数以及菌根侵染丰度等级占比都显著上升; 相比于只喷施除草剂处理, 接种AMF显著增加南美蟛蜞菊的叶面积、地上生物量和根冠比, 显著减少黄酮醇相对含量以及叶片损害数。首次发现与AMF的共生能缓解除草剂对入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊的胁迫。因此, 在杂草的化学防治过程中, 与AMF的共生可能极大提高杂草对除草剂的抗性, 可为入侵杂草的有效防控提供新的思考途径。

关键词: 南美蟛蜞菊, 丛枝菌根真菌, 草甘膦铵盐除草剂, 植物微生物互作

Abstract:

Aims Invasive Sphagneticola trilobataseriously endangers the stability of local plant communities and ecosystems. Recently, chemical control is still the most important method for controlling it. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) play an important role in the growth of host plants and their resistance to environmental stresses. Therefore, this study tested whether AMF played an important role in herbicide resistance of S. trilobata.

Methods In this study, a greenhouse experiment was conducted, in which the stems of S. trilobata were subject to the following four treatments: control (CK), only inoculation of AMF, only application of herbicides (HC), and herbicide plus AMF (AMF + HC).

Important findings The results showed that under the stress of glyphosate ammonium salt, the colonization rate, vesicle number and ratio of colonization abundance class increased significantly. Compared with herbicide application, AMF inoculation significantly increased the leaf area, above-ground biomass and root shoot ratio of S. trilobata, and significantly reduced the flavonol relative content and the damaged leaf number. This study found that the herbicide stress on invasive S. trilobata was alleviated because of the symbiosis with AMF. Therefore, AMF may greatly improve the resistance to chemical herbicides in this invasive forb. The results of this study may provide a new insight into the effective control of invasive weeds.

Key words: Sphagneticola trilobata, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, glyphosate ammonium salt herbicide, plant-microbial interaction

胡蝶, 蒋欣琪, 戴志聪, 陈戴一, 张雨, 祁珊珊, 杜道林. 丛枝菌根真菌提高入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊对除草剂的耐受性. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 651-659. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0383

HU Die, JIANG Xin-Qi, DAI Zhi-Cong, CHEN Dai-Yi, ZHANG Yu, QI Shan-Shan, DU Dao-Lin. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance the capacity of invasive Sphagneticola trilobata to tolerate herbicides. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2024, 48(5): 651-659. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0383

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2023.0383

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2024/V48/I5/651

图/表 5

图1 不同处理下南美蟛蜞菊的菌根侵染率(A)、泡囊数(B)和侵染丰度等级占比(C) (平均值±标准差)。AMF, 接种丛枝菌根真菌; HC, 喷施除草剂。*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01。

Fig. 1 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization rate (A), vesicle number (B), and ratio of colonization abundance class (C) of Sphagneticola trilobata under different treatments (mean ± SD). AMF, inoculating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; HC, apply herbicide treatment. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.

图2 不同处理下南美蟛蜞菊的叶绿素(A)、花青素(B)和黄酮醇(C)相对含量(平均值±标准差)。AMF, 只接种丛枝菌根真菌; CK, 对照; HC, 只喷施除草剂。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(n = 5, p < 0.05)。

Fig. 2 Chlorophyll (A), anthocyanin (B) and flavonol (C) relative content of Sphagneticola trilobata under different treatments (mean ± SD).AMF, only inoculating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; CK, control; HC, only applying herbicide. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments (n = 5, p < 0.05).

图3 不同处理下南美蟛蜞菊的茎长(A)、间隔子长度(B)、叶面积(C)和叶片损害数(D) (平均值±标准差)。AMF, 只接种丛枝菌根真菌; CK, 对照; HC, 只喷施除草剂。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(n = 5, p < 0.05)。

Fig. 3 Stem length (A), spacer length (B), leaf area (C), and damaged leaf number (D) of Sphagneticola trilobata under different treatments (mean ± SD). AMF, only inoculating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; CK, control; HC, only applying herbicide. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments (n = 5, p < 0.05).

图4 不同处理下南美蟛蜞菊的根系形态(A)、根长(B)、根数(C)和根表面积(D) (平均值±标准差)。AMF, 只接种丛枝菌根真菌; CK, 对照; HC, 只喷施除草剂。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(n = 5, p < 0.05)。

Fig. 4 Root morphology (A), root length (B), root number (C), and root surface area (D) of Sphagneticola trilobata under different treatments (mean ± SD). AMF, only inoculating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; CK, control; HC, only applying herbicide. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments (n = 5, p < 0.05).

图5 不同处理下南美蟛蜞菊的地上生物量、总生物量(A)、地下生物量(B)和根冠比(C) (平均值±标准差)。AMF, 只接种丛枝菌根真菌; CK, 对照; HC, 只喷施除草剂。不同字母表示不同处理间差异显著(n = 5, p < 0.05)。

Fig. 5 Above-ground biomass, total biomass (A), below-ground biomass (B), and root shoot ratio (C) of Sphagneticola trilobata under different treatments (mean ± SD). AMF, only inoculating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; CK, control; HC, only applying herbicide. Different letters represent significant differences among different treatments (n = 5, p < 0.05).

参考文献 56

[1]	Brundrett MC, Tedersoo L (2018). Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity. New Phytologist, 220, 1108-1115.
[2]	Chen J, Zhang HQ, Zhang XL, Tang M (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alleviates salt stress in black locust through improved photosynthesis, water status, and K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1739. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01739.
[3]	Chen Q, Cheng H, Li Q, He FR, Wu WW, Qi SS, Dai ZC, Du DL (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote the growth of Wedelia trilobata under low phosphorus environment. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 48, 103-107.
	[陈琪, 程浩, 李琴, 贺芙蓉, 吴闻文, 祁珊珊, 戴志聪, 杜道林 (2020). 丛枝菌根真菌促进南美蟛蜞菊在低磷环境下的生长. 江苏农业科学, 48, 103-107.]
[4]	Chen Q, Wu W, Qi S, Cheng H, Li Q, Ran Q, Dai Z, Du D, Egan S, Thomas T (2021). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth and disease resistance of the invasive plant Wedelia trilobata. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 130, 582-591.
[5]	Cornelissen JHC, Song Y, Yu F, Dong M (2014). Plant traits and ecosystem effects of clonality: a new research agenda. Annals of Botany, 114, 369-376. DOI PMID
[6]	Courchamp F, Fournier A, Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Bonnaud E, Jeschke JM, Russell JC (2017). Invasion biology: specific problems and possible solutions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, 13-22.
[7]	Davidson BE, Novak SJ, Serpe MD (2016). Consequences of inoculation with native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for root colonization and survival of Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis seedlings after transplanting. Mycorrhiza, 26, 595-608.
[8]	Dowarah B, Gill SS, Agarwala N (2022). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in conferring tolerance to biotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41, 1429-1444.
[9]	Duke SO, Powles SB (2008). Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Management Science, 64, 319-325. DOI PMID
[10]	Elsheikh EAE, El-Keblawy A, Mosa KA, Okoh AI, Saadoun I (2021). Role of endophytes and rhizosphere microbes in promoting the invasion of exotic plants in arid and semi-arid areas: a review. Sustainability, 13, 13081. DOI: 10.3390/su132313081.
[11]	Faria AT, de Seia Gonçalves BF, Saraiva DT, de Freitas Souza M, da Silva AA, Silva DV (2018). Activity of rhizosphere soil microorganisms of sugarcane cultivars after spraying of herbicides: diuron, tebuthiuron, ametryn and diuron + hexazinone. Revista Caatinga, 31, 593-601.
[12]	Fomina M, Ritz K, Gadd GM (2003). Nutritional influence on the ability of fungal mycelia to penetrate toxic metal- containing domains. Mycological Research, 107, 861-871.
[13]	Gao XP, Guo HH, Zhang Q, Guo HX, Zhang L, Zhang CY, Gou ZY, Liu Y, Wei JM, Chen AY, Chu ZH, Zeng FC (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhanced the growth, yield, fiber quality and phosphorus regulation in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Scientific Reports, 10, 2084. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59180-3.
[14]	Gao Y, Liu H, Tao B (2013). Screening for glyphosate resistant wild soybean (Glycine soja) and study on its physiological mechanisms of resistance. Agricultural Science & Technology, 14, 1263-1266.
	[高越, 刘辉, 陶波 (2013). 抗草甘膦野生大豆筛选及其抗性生理机制研究. 农业科学与技术, 14, 1263-1266.]
[15]	Gharineh MH, Nadian H, Fathi G, Siadat A, Maadi B (2009). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizae in development of salt- tolerance of Trifolium alexandrinum plants under salinity stress. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 7, 432-437.
[16]	Guo SL, Jiang HW, Fang F, Chen GQ (2009). Influences of herbicides, uprooting and use as cut flowers on sexual reproduction of Solidago canadensis. Weed Research, 49, 291-299.
[17]	Hao ZP, Xie W, Chen BD (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis affects plant immunity to viral infection and accumulation. Viruses, 11, 534. DOI: 10.3390/v11060534.
[18]	Helander M, Saloniemi I, Saikkonen K (2012). Glyphosate in northern ecosystems. Trends in Plant Science, 17, 569-574. DOI PMID
[19]	Henry WB, Koger CH, Shaner DL (2005). Accumulation of shikimate in corn and soybean exposed to various rates of glyphosate. Crop Management, 4, 1-7.
[20]	Huang X, He J, Yan X, Hong Q, Chen K, He Q, Zhang L, Liu XW, Chuang SC, Li SP, Jiang JD (2017). Microbial catabolism of chemical herbicides: microbial resources, metabolic pathways and catabolic genes. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 143, 272-297. DOI PMID
[21]	Hulme PE (2012). Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 10-19.
[22]	Jajoo A, Mathur S (2021). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as an underground saviuor for protecting plants from abiotic stresses. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 27, 2589-2603. DOI PMID
[23]	Jakobsen I, Murmann LM, Rosendahl S (2021). Hormetic responses in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 159, 108299. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021. 108299.
[24]	Jeong S, Kim TM, Choi B, Kim Y, Kim E (2021). Invasive Lactuca serriola seeds contain endophytic bacteria that contribute to drought tolerance. Scientific Reports, 11, 13307. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92706-x.
[25]	Jiang YN, Wang WX, Xie QJ, Liu N, Liu LX, Wang DP, Zhang XW, Yang C, Chen XY, Tang DZ, Wang ET (2017). Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi. Science, 356, 1172-1175. DOI PMID
[26]	Ke ZH, Chen YF, Hui M, Song LY (2014). Comparative study on allelopathic effects of Wedelia trilobata and Wedelia chinensis. Journal of South China Normal Univesity (Natural Science Edition), 46(1), 83-88.
	[柯展鸿, 陈雁飞, 惠苗, 宋莉英 (2014). 南美蟛蜞菊和蟛蜞菊化感作用的比较研究. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 46(1), 83-88.]
[27]	Landwehr M, Hildebrandt U, Wilde P, Nawrath K, Tóth T, Biró B, Bothe H (2002). The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus geosporum in European saline, sodic and gypsum soils. Mycorrhiza, 12, 199-211. PMID
[28]	Lenoir I, Fontaine J, Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui A(2016). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to abiotic stresses: a review. Phytochemistry, 123, 4-15. DOI PMID
[29]	Li H, Wu ZH, Wang ZC, Xu YX, Chen SX (2013). Studies on the effectiveness of different herbicides mixtures on Wedelia trilobata under young Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis. Eucalypt Science and Technology, 30(2), 15-20.
	[李慧, 吴志华, 王志超, 许宇星, 陈少雄 (2013). 不同除草剂复配对幼龄尾巨桉林下南美蟛蜞菊的防治效果研究. 桉树科技, 30(2), 15-20.]
[30]	Liu J, Dong M, Miao SL, Li ZY, Song MH, Wang RQ (2006). Invasive alien plants in China: role of clonality and geographical origin. Biological Invasions, 8, 1461-1470.
[31]	Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000). 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species. Invasive Species Specialist Group, Auckland, New Zealand.
[32]	Malty JD, Siqueira JO, Moreira FMD (2006). Effects of glyphosate on soybean symbiotic microorganisms, in culture media and in greenhouse. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 41, 285-291.
[33]	Miozzi L, Vaira AM, Catoni M, Fiorilli V, Accotto GP, Lanfranco L (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: plant friend or foe in the fight against viruses. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 1238. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01238.
[34]	Morandi D (1989). Effect of xenobiotics on endomycorrhizal infections and isoflavonoid accumulation in soybean roots. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 27, 697-701.
[35]	Oliveira CM, Auad AM, Mendes SM, Frizzas MR (2014). Crop losses and the economic impact of insect pests on Brazilian agriculture. Crop Protection, 56, 50-54.
[36]	Olszyk D, Pfleeger T, Lee EH, Plocher M (2015). Glyphosate and dicamba herbicide tank mixture effects on native plant and non-genetically engineered soybean seedlings. Ecotoxicology, 24, 1014-1027. DOI PMID
[37]	Pang F, Xia WK, He M, Qi SS, Dai ZC, Du DL (2020). Nitrogen-fixing bacteria alleviates competition between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Solidago canadensis for nutrients under nitrogen limitation. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44, 782-790.
	[庞芳, 夏维康, 何敏, 祁珊珊, 戴志聪, 杜道林 (2020). 固氮菌缓解氮限制环境中丛枝菌根真菌对加拿大一枝黄花的营养竞争. 植物生态学报, 44, 782-790.]
[38]	Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970). Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55, 158-161.
[39]	Ruuskanen S, Fuchs B, Nissinen R, Puigbò P, Rainio M, Saikkonen K, Helander M (2023). Ecosystem consequences of herbicides: the role of microbiome. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38, 35-43.
[40]	Savin MC, Purcell LC, Daigh A, Manfredini A (2009). Response of mycorrhizal infection to glyphosate applications and P fertilization in glyphosate-tolerant soybean, maize, and cotton. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32, 1702-1717.
[41]	Shen K, Cornelissen JHC, Wang Y, Wu C, He Y, Ou J, Tan Q, Xia T, Kang L, Guo Y, Wu B (2020). AM fungi alleviate phosphorus limitation and enhance nutrient competitiveness of invasive plants via mycorrhizal networks in karst areas. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 125. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00125.
[42]	Tian B, Pei Y, Huang W, Ding J, Siemann E (2021). Increasing flavonoid concentrations in root exudates enhance associations between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and an invasive plant. ISME Journal, 15, 1919-1930. DOI PMID
[43]	Tian XJ, Li X, Shen YM, Shen DR, He C (2018). Effects of glyphosate on physiology and genotoxicity of Wedelia trilobata. Journal of Honghe University, 16(5), 150-152.
	[田学军, 李珣, 沈云玫, 沈登荣, 何超 (2018). 草甘膦对南美蟛蜞菊的遗传毒性和生理的影响. 红河学院学报, 16(5), 150-152.]
[44]	Tian XJ, Tao HZ, Shen YM, Yuan H, Shen DR, He C (2016). Effects of atrazine on antioxidase activity and genotoxicity of Wedelia trilobata (L.) A. S. Hitche. Agrochemicals, 55, 672-674.
	[田学军, 陶宏征, 沈云玫, 袁寒, 沈登荣, 何超 (2016). 莠去津对南美蟛蜞菊抗氧化酶活性的影响与细胞毒性. 农药, 55, 672-674.]
[45]	Trouvelot A (1986). Mesure du taux de mycorhization va d’un système radiculaire. Recherche de méthodes d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle//Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S. Mycorrhizae: Physiology and Genetics. INRA Press, Paris.
[46]	van Bruggen AHC, He M, Shin K, Mai V, Jeong KC, Finckh MR, Morris JG (2018). Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate. Science of the Total Environment, 616-617, 255-268.
[47]	Velmourougane K, Blaise D, Manikandan A, Savitha S, Waghmare VN (2021). Environmental impacts of herbicide tolerant crops and glyphosate-based herbicides—A review. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 19, 3481-3504.
[48]	Wang JH, Hu D, Shi XN, Luo J, Ren GQ, Dai ZC, Qi SS, Du DL (2022). Different responses of invasive weed Alternanthera philoxeroides and Oryza sativa to plant growth regulators. Life-Basel, 12, 1069. DOI: 10.3390/life12071069.
[49]	Wang Q, Liu GD (2020). A method for detecting arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi based on amplicon sequencing. Genomics and Applied Biology, 39, 5617-5624.
	[王启, 刘广达 (2020). 一种基于扩增子测序检测丛枝菌根真菌的方法. 基因组学与应用生物学, 39, 5617-5624.]
[50]	Winagraski E, Kaschuk G, Monteiro PHR, Auer CG, Higa AR (2019). Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in forest ecosystems of Brazil: a review. Cerne, 25, 25-35. DOI
[51]	Wu YQ, Hu JS (2006). Wedelia trilobata responses to herbicides’ stress and its chemical control. Ecological Science, 25, 325-329.
	[吴彦琼, 胡劲松 (2006). 南美蟛蜞菊对除莠剂的胁迫反应及其化学防除. 生态科学, 25, 325-329.]
[52]	Wu YQ, Hu YJ, Liao FL (2005). Wedelia trilobata—A species from introduced to potential invasive. Guihaia, 25, 413-418.
	[吴彦琼, 胡玉佳, 廖富林 (2005). 从引进到潜在入侵的植物——南美蟛蜞菊. 广西植物, 25, 413-418.]
[53]	Yang LQ, Liao FY, Zhao K (2011). Effect of herbicides on the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence of Solidago canadensis L. Advanced Materials Research, 356-360, 2785-2790.
[54]	Yang RY, Yu GD, Tang JJ, Chen X (2008). Effects of metal lead on growth and mycorrhizae of an invasive plant species (Solidago canadensis L.). Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20, 739-744.
[55]	Zhang F, Li Q, Yerger EH, Chen X, Shi Q, Wan F (2018). AM fungi facilitate the competitive growth of two invasive plant species, Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Bidens pilosa. Mycorrhiza, 28, 703-715.
[56]	Zou TT, Jin CZ, Zhu ZJ, Hu YH (2019). Detection of glyphosate resistance in black nightshade Solanum nigrum from Hunan China. Science Asia, 45, 419-424.

丛枝菌根真菌提高入侵杂草南美蟛蜞菊对除草剂的耐受性

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance the capacity of invasive Sphagneticola trilobata to tolerate herbicides

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 56

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	魏莉, 王鹏森, 刘珊, 樊锐, 黄楠, 张建国, 其美拉姆, 苟扬, 刘沫含, 黄婷, 周冀琼. 丛枝菌根真菌对豆禾混播植物垂直生态位养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 760-773.
[2]	周春菡, 熊智诚, 杨明新, 史海兰, 周亚星, 唐玉, 张静, 纪宝明, 代心灵. 黄河源园区高寒湿地菌根真菌群落特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 625-638.
[3]	姜庆宏, 丁露, 王哲, 郑春丽, 冯昭绰. 丛枝菌根真菌与不同功能细菌联用对苜蓿的促生作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 774-788.
[4]	马建辉, 童鑫, 张思榕, 毛子昆, 秦俊, 马克平. 菌根真菌生理生态功能研究进展及展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 498-514.
[5]	王海浪, 付伟, 伍松林, 陈保冬. 丛枝菌根真菌生态功能及群落调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 515-535.
[6]	秦斐斐, 唐朝辉, 司彤, 慈敦伟. 盐碱耐受型和敏感型花生生长发育及根际土壤特性对丛枝菌根真菌的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 742-759.
[7]	邹纪开, 吴佳怡, 谷云懿, 陈宝明. 不同形态氮添加与丛枝菌根真菌对外来入侵植物白花鬼针草竞争力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 722-730.
[8]	何正嘉, 曾歆然, 王琳影, 薛昕宇, 苏钦泽, 李宇, 张寅杰, 吴辉煌, 陈成聪, 吴良泉, 魏安妮, 仇云鹏, 郭梨锦. 茶园丛枝菌根真菌群落和土壤有机碳对镁肥的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 700-709.
[9]	段世龙, 余成瑾, 许心垚, 冯固, 谢贤安, 张林. 植物-丛枝菌根真菌-细菌连续体及其维持机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 600-611.
[10]	江康威, 吕程, 王亚菲, 李宏, 张芷晴, 王雨, 张青青, 吐尔逊娜依•热依木. 放牧干扰下丛枝菌根真菌群落对土壤多功能性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 685-699.
[11]	何堂庆, 王变变, 曹鑫鑫, 张康成, 汪晓东, 王浩, 白彤硕, 赵叶新, 张艺, 王益, 仇云鹏, 胡水金. 半干旱草地植物和丛枝菌根真菌群落对长期降水增加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 674-684.
[12]	王梦雪, 胡明艳, 储诚进, 陈阳, 罗文启, 马子龙. 亚热带森林不同菌根真菌树种叶片和细根的碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 334-343.
[13]	张斌, 张浩成, 乔天, 吕治兵, 许亚男, 李雪芹, 原向阳, 冯美臣, 张美俊. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫燕麦非结构性碳水化合物及碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1082-1095.
[14]	陈科宇, 邢森, 唐玉, 孙佳慧, 任世杰, 张静, 纪宝明. 不同草地类型土壤丛枝菌根真菌群落特征及其驱动因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 660-674.
[15]	陈保冬, 付伟, 伍松林, 朱永官. 菌根真菌在陆地生态系统碳循环中的作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 1-20.