植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 414-420.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0055 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2006.0055
全占军1,2,3(
), 程宏1,2, 于云江3,*(
), 邹学勇1,2
接受日期:2005-08-16
发布日期:2006-05-30
作者简介:*E-mail: yuyi@craes.org.cn基金资助:
QUAN Zhan-Jun1,2,3(
), CHENG Hong1,2, YU Yun-Jiang3,*(
), ZOU Xue-Yong1,2
Accepted:2005-08-16
Published:2006-05-30
摘要:
借助地表沉陷预测模型,预测了地表沉陷状况,依据地表沉陷对景观的破坏程度划分出重度影响区和轻度影响区;在遥感及地理信息系统技术的支持下,把植被景观现状与地表沉陷影响区叠加,通过沉陷前后景观格局的变化分析,对山西省晋城市东大煤矿的生态影响进行了探索性评价研究。结果表明:1) 重度影响区地表会出现盆型、马鞍型和波浪型等塌陷或裂缝,土壤侵蚀的作用将导致土壤养分空间格局发生明显变化。塌陷或裂缝周围生境恶化,成为养分流失源,植被恢复困难;养分汇处土壤水、肥条件优越,植被演替迅速,适当的人为干扰可以加快区域生态环境的恢复步伐。2) 地表沉陷后,植被景观破碎及隔离程度严重,原有的稳定态景观格局被打破,随着地形、土壤的空间变化,植被开始新一轮发展演替。由于原先占绝对优势的退化植被类型白羊草(Bothriochloa ischemum)-百里香(Thymus mongolicus)型优势度下降,同时,大部分次优势景观的内部生态功能受影响不大,这对景观整体的生物多样性以及次优势景观类型的演替是有益的,但是,重度影响区对斑块的隔离呈直线性,这对物种迁移的障碍是明显的。因此,重视井田区的封育与引种工作,科学规划、合理布局,在此基础上,引导植被演替沿着白羊草-百里香型—白羊草-黄背草(Themeda japonica)型—灌木丛—阔叶林的方向发展是可行的。
全占军, 程宏, 于云江, 邹学勇. 煤矿井田区地表沉陷对植被景观的影响——以山西省晋城市东大煤矿为例. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3): 414-420. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0055
QUAN Zhan-Jun, CHENG Hong, YU Yun-Jiang, ZOU Xue-Yong. ASSESSMENT OF SUBSIDENCE IMPACT ON VEGETATION LANDSCAPE IN COAL MINING AREA —A CASE STUDY OF DONGDA MINE IN JINCHENG CITY, SHANXI PROVINCE. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(3): 414-420. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0055
| 类型 Type | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | 合计 Total | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 面积 Area (km2) | 2.33 | 3.03 | 18.32 | 7.76 | 10.14 | 19.85 | 55.56 | 9.28 | 126.27 | ||||||||||
| 面积比例 Percent of total(%) | 1.75 | 2.30 | 13.78 | 5.76 | 7.63 | 15.00 | 41.79 | 6.98 | 94.97 | ||||||||||
表1 植被类型面积统计表
Table 1 Statistics of vegetation type area
| 类型 Type | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | 合计 Total | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 面积 Area (km2) | 2.33 | 3.03 | 18.32 | 7.76 | 10.14 | 19.85 | 55.56 | 9.28 | 126.27 | ||||||||||
| 面积比例 Percent of total(%) | 1.75 | 2.30 | 13.78 | 5.76 | 7.63 | 15.00 | 41.79 | 6.98 | 94.97 | ||||||||||
| 类型 Type | 轻度干扰区 Slight influencing areas | 重度干扰区 Heavy influencing areas | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 面积 Area (km2) | 比例 Percent of total (%) | 面积 Area (km2) | 比例 Percent of total (%) | |
| I | 1.59 | 2.72 | 0.35 | 1.61 |
| II | 1.93 | 3.30 | 0.41 | 1.88 |
| III | 11.06 | 18.94 | 3.29 | 14.94 |
| IV | 2.21 | 3.79 | 0.78 | 3.56 |
| V | 2.60 | 4.45 | 1.14 | 5.16 |
| VI | 9.42 | 16.13 | 3.35 | 15.21 |
| VII | 26.51 | 45.41 | 11.19 | 50.83 |
| VIII | 3.08 | 5.27 | 1.50 | 6.81 |
| 合计Total | 58.38 | 100.00 | 22.01 | 100.00 |
表2 地表沉陷对植被景观影响面积统计
Table 2 Statistic of the effect of ground subsidence on vegetation type
| 类型 Type | 轻度干扰区 Slight influencing areas | 重度干扰区 Heavy influencing areas | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 面积 Area (km2) | 比例 Percent of total (%) | 面积 Area (km2) | 比例 Percent of total (%) | |
| I | 1.59 | 2.72 | 0.35 | 1.61 |
| II | 1.93 | 3.30 | 0.41 | 1.88 |
| III | 11.06 | 18.94 | 3.29 | 14.94 |
| IV | 2.21 | 3.79 | 0.78 | 3.56 |
| V | 2.60 | 4.45 | 1.14 | 5.16 |
| VI | 9.42 | 16.13 | 3.35 | 15.21 |
| VII | 26.51 | 45.41 | 11.19 | 50.83 |
| VIII | 3.08 | 5.27 | 1.50 | 6.81 |
| 合计Total | 58.38 | 100.00 | 22.01 | 100.00 |
| 类型 Type | 最大斑块指数 Largest patch index | 景观形状指数 Landscape shape index | 斑块凝结指数 Patch cohesion index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 沉陷前 Before ground subsidence | I | 0.03 | 8.90 | 93.80 |
| II | 0.18 | 11.06 | 96.45 | |
| III | 0.25 | 23.91 | 97.20 | |
| IV | 0.42 | 34.12 | 97.14 | |
| V | 0.55 | 34.21 | 96.58 | |
| VI | 1.05 | 45.68 | 98.39 | |
| VII | 19.48 | 32.10 | 99.88 | |
| VIII | 0.03 | 22.52 | 92.42 | |
| 沉陷后 After ground subsidence | I | 0.02 | 5.29 | 91.00 |
| II | 0.03 | 7.47 | 94.52 | |
| III | 0.19 | 15.77 | 96.55 | |
| IV | 0.14 | 20.04 | 94.17 | |
| V | 0.3 | 19.26 | 89.86 | |
| VI | 0.23 | 31.02 | 97.09 | |
| VII | 2.00 | 23.40 | 99.22 | |
| VIII | 0.03 | 10.83 | 92.10 |
表3 地表沉陷前后景观格局指数对比
Table 3 The comparison with landscape pattern index before and after ground subsidence
| 类型 Type | 最大斑块指数 Largest patch index | 景观形状指数 Landscape shape index | 斑块凝结指数 Patch cohesion index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 沉陷前 Before ground subsidence | I | 0.03 | 8.90 | 93.80 |
| II | 0.18 | 11.06 | 96.45 | |
| III | 0.25 | 23.91 | 97.20 | |
| IV | 0.42 | 34.12 | 97.14 | |
| V | 0.55 | 34.21 | 96.58 | |
| VI | 1.05 | 45.68 | 98.39 | |
| VII | 19.48 | 32.10 | 99.88 | |
| VIII | 0.03 | 22.52 | 92.42 | |
| 沉陷后 After ground subsidence | I | 0.02 | 5.29 | 91.00 |
| II | 0.03 | 7.47 | 94.52 | |
| III | 0.19 | 15.77 | 96.55 | |
| IV | 0.14 | 20.04 | 94.17 | |
| V | 0.3 | 19.26 | 89.86 | |
| VI | 0.23 | 31.02 | 97.09 | |
| VII | 2.00 | 23.40 | 99.22 | |
| VIII | 0.03 | 10.83 | 92.10 |
| [1] | Fan YH (范英宏), Lu ZH (陆兆华), Cheng JL (程建龙), Zhou ZX (周忠轩), Wu G (吴钢) (2003). Major ecological and environmental problems and the ecological reconstruction technologies of the coal mining areas in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23,2144-2152. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [2] | Geng DM (耿殿明), Jiang FX (姜福兴) (2003). Analysis on ecological environment of mine area in China. Coal Mine Environmental Protection (煤矿环境保护), 16(6),5-10. (in Chinese) |
| [3] | Geng DM (耿殿明), Jiang FX (姜福兴), Zhang PZ (张朋柱) (2001). Some theoretical difficulties about sustainable development of coal mines. China Mining Magazine (中国矿业), 10(5),18-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [4] | Huggett RJ (1991). Climate, Earth Processes, and Earth History. Springer, Berlin, 281. |
| [5] | Liang M (梁明), Wang CX (王成绪) (2001). Prediction of mining subsidence in mountain area overlaid with thick loess bed. Coal Geology and Exploration (煤田地质与勘探), 29(2),44-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [6] | Lu L, Li X, Cheng GD (2003). Landscape evolution in the middle Heihe River Basin of north-west China during the last decade. Journal of Arid Environments, 53,395-408. |
| [7] | Ma XA (马祥爱), Bai ZK (白中科), Shao YH (邵月红), Zhang SH (张世海), Wu JS (吴俊松), Zhao M (赵民) (2004). Eco-environmental impact assessment on subsidence with coal mining in Loess Hilly Areas——Taking Kaiyuan Mine of Yangquan Coal Limited Company as example. Journal of Shanxi Agriculture University (山西农业大学学报), 24,47-52. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [8] | Mao HY (毛汉英), Fang CL (方创琳) (1998). Cave-in land types by coal mining and their comprehensive utilization ecological model. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 18,449-455. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [9] | Phillips JD (1995). Biogeomorphology and landscape evolution: the problem of scale. Geomorphology, 13,337-347. |
| [10] | Shi QD (施群德), Zhao JF (赵建锋), Su ZJ (苏仲杰) (2000). Prospects and developments of study on fractals in mining subsidence. Journal of Engineering Geology (工程地质学报), 8,341-344. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [11] | Si SY (司双印), Zhang YB (张运备), Ma JJ (马敬杰), He LL (贺留兰), Qin SC (秦世昌) (2004). Restoring the eco-environment and sustainable economic development in collapse area of coal mines. Journal of Geological Hazards and Enironment Preservation (地质灾害与环境保护), 15(3),11-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [12] | Sui WH (隋枉华), Chen Q (陈奇) (1995). Simple comment on research meaning, present situation, mechanism of soil mass settlement deformation caused by coal bed mining and the way of forecast. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control (中国地质灾害与防治学报), 6(1),1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [13] | Wei CY (韦朝阳), Zhang LC (张立城), He SJ (何书金) (1997). A discussion on the eco-environmental conditions in the coal mining areas in China. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 52,300-307. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [14] | Whitney JA (2002). Landscape evolution of the five islands of south Louisiana: scientific policy and salt dome utilization and management. Geomorphology, 47,227-244. |
| [15] | Zhao YF (赵扬锋), Zhang HX (张华兴), Pan YS (潘一山) (2004). Numerical simulation of overlay stratums' effect to subsidence of stripe mining. Coal Mining Technology (煤矿开采), 9(3),1-3. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 逯子佳, 王天瑞, 郑斯斯, 孟宏虎, 曹建国, Gregor KOZLOWSKI, 宋以刚. 孑遗植物湖北枫杨的环境适应性遗传变异与遗传脆弱性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1626-1642. |
| [2] | 薛鹏飞, 李文龙, 朱高峰, 周华坤, 刘陈立, 晏和飘. 黄河首曲玛曲县高寒湿地景观格局演变[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(5): 467-475. |
| [3] | 汲玉河, 周广胜. 1988-2006年辽河三角洲植被结构的变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(4): 359-367. |
| [4] | 张志东, 臧润国. 海南岛霸王岭热带天然林景观格局与动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(6): 1034-1043. |
| [5] | 刘海江, 程维明, 龙恩. 受损沙地生态系统景观变化分析——以内蒙古浑善达克沙地为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(6): 1063-1072. |
| [6] | 彭羽, 蒋高明, 李永庚, 刘美珍, 牛书丽, 于顺利, 杨道斌. 浑善达克沙地榆树疏林自然保护区核心区设计的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(5): 775-780. |
| [7] | 王海珍, 张利权. 基于GIS、景观格局和网络分析法的厦门本岛生态网络规划[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(1): 144-152. |
| [8] | 王兮之, 葛剑平. 40多年来塔南策勒绿洲动态变化研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(3): 369-375. |
| [9] | 张利权, 吴健平, 甄彧, 束炯. 基于GIS的上海市景观格局梯度分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(1): 78-85. |
| [10] | 李晓兵, 陈云浩, 李霞. 测量的区域土地覆盖格局研基于多尺度遥感究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(5): 577-586. |
| [11] | James M. LE MOINE, 陈吉泉. 生态学的时空特性(英文)[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(1): 1-10. |
| [12] | 马克明, 张洁瑜, 郭旭东, 傅伯杰. 农业景观中山体的植物多样性分布:地形和土地利用的综合影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(5): 575-588. |
| [13] | 马克明, 傅伯杰. 北京东灵山地区景观格局及破碎化评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(3): 320-326. |
| [14] | 郭晋平, 王俊田, 李世光. 关帝山林区景观要素沿环境梯度分布趋势的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(2): 135-140. |
| [15] | 乌云娜, 李政海. 锡林郭勒草原景观多样性的时间变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(1): 58-63. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19