银桂初花物候期的气候条件

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0056

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

根据江苏省苏州市东山县1956~1984年和1999~2003年银桂(Osmanthus fragrans)物候资料和同期气象资料,应用数理统计方法分析了银桂初花的气候指标,发现银桂初花期与初花前最低气温和相对湿度关系密切。早银桂初花的气候指标为:日最低气温10 d滑动平均稳定≤23.0 ℃,同时日最低气温<22.0 ℃,满足这指标之后3~12 d早银桂初花;或当日最低气温10 d滑动平均稳定在23.0~25.5 ℃,同时日平均相对湿度≥88%连续在3 d(包括3 d)以上,在这日期之后的12 d内早银桂初花。晚银桂初花的气候指标为:当日最低气温9 d滑动平均稳定≤20 ℃,同时日最低气温<19.5 ℃,满足这指标后4~12 d晚银桂初花;或当日最低气温9 d滑动平均稳定在20.0~21.5 ℃,同时日平均相对湿度≥88%连续在3 d(包括3 d)以上,在这日期之后的6 d内晚银桂初花。日最低气温10 d滑动平均稳定>25.5 ℃时,早银桂不开花;日最低气温9 d滑动平均稳定>21.5 ℃时,晚银桂不开花。晚银桂和早银桂初花期存在显著的相关,相关系数为0.443 8(n=34),平均初花期晚银桂比早银桂迟15 d。由于受全球气候变暖的影响,1999~2003年苏州东山地区银桂类初花期比1956~1984年推迟了7~8 d。

关键词: 银桂, 初花, 温度, 指标, 气候变化

Abstract:

Climatic indices for initial flowering in Osmanthus fragrans were analyzed statistically by comparing the phenological data and climate data from 1956 to 1984 and from 1999 to 2003 in Dongshan County, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. The results showed that the initial flowering date of O. fragrans was closely related to daily minimum temperature and relative humidity. For early flowering O. fragrans, initial flowering occurred 3 to 12 days later following a condition that the daily minimum temperature of 10-day-moving-average (DMTMA10)≤23.0 ℃ and the daily minimum temperature <22.0 ℃, or 12 days later following a condition that DMTMA10 stays between 23.0 and 25.5 ℃ and the daily average relative humidity (DARH)≥88% for 3 or more than 3 days. It would not get flowering if the DMTMA10>25.5 ℃. For late floweringO. fragrans, initial flowering occurred 4 to 12 days later following a condition that the daily minimum temperature of 9-day-moving-average (DMTMA9)≤20.0 ℃ and the daily minimum temperature <19.5 ℃, or 6 days later following a condition that DMTMA9 stays between 20.0 and 21.5 ℃ and the DARH≥88% for 3 or more than 3 days. It would not get flowering if the DMTMA9>21.5 ℃. The date of initial flowering of early floweringO. fragrans and that of late flowering O. fragrans were significantly correlated (r=0.443 8, n=34). The initial flowering date of late flowering O. fragrans is, on average, 15 days later than that of the early flowering O. fragrans. The initial flowering date of both types of O. fragrans during 1999 and 2003 was postponed 7-8 days compared with that during 1956 and 1984 in Dongshan County due to global climate warming.

Key words: Osmanthus fragrans, Initial flowering, temperature, Indices, Climatic change

李军, 杨秋珍, 杨康民. 银桂初花物候期的气候条件. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3): 421-425. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0056

LI Jun, YANG Qiu-Zhen, YANG Kang-Min. CLIMATIC INDICES FOR INITIAL FLOWERING IN OSMANTHUS FRAGRANS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(3): 421-425. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0056

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0056

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2006/V30/I3/421

图/表 4

参考文献 14

[1]	Cheng HZ (成海钟), Yuan ML (袁美勒) (2004). Osmanthus fragrans culture of Suzhou. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) (南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)), 28 (Suppl.),101-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Chmielcwski FM, Røtzer T (2001). Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 108,101-102.
[3]	Fang XQ (方修琦), Yu WH (余卫红) (2002). Progress in the studies on the phenological responding to global warming. Advance in Earth Science (地球科学进展), 17,714-719. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Huang JF (黄敬峰), Wang XZ (王秀珍), Cai CX (蔡承侠) (2000). Research on winter wheat phenology and climate in Xinjiang. Agricultural Meteorology (中国农业气象), 21(1),14-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	Snyder RL, Spano D, Duce P (2001). Temperature data for phonological models. International Journal of Biometeorology, 45,178-183. DOI URL PMID
[6]	Weng ES (翁恩生), Zhou GS (周广胜) (2005). Defining plant functional types in China for global change studies. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29,81-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Wu GH (吴光洪), Hu SQ (胡绍庆), Xuan ZC (宣子灿), Xiang QB (向其柏) (2004). Standard of classification and application of sweet Osmanthus. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College (浙江林学院学报), 21,281-284. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	Xu YQ (徐雨晴), Lu PL (陆佩玲), Yu Q (于强) (2004). Review and prospect in the researches of influence of climate change on plant phenology. Resources Science (资源科学), 26,129-136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Yang YQ (杨永岐) (1983). Statistical Method in Argo-Meteorology (农业气象中的统计方法). China Meteorological Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[10]	Yu CH (余传华), Yan J (颜杰) (2002). Excel and Analysis of Datum (Excel与数据分析). Electronic Industry Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[11]	Yang KM (杨康民), Zhu WJ (朱文江) (2000). Osmanthus fragrans Lour (桂花). Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
[12]	Yang KM (杨康民), Zhu WJ (朱文江), Jiang YM (蒋永明), Wang JY (王家元), Wang YS (王元松) (1986). Observations on the blooming phenology and the time of harvesting of the flower of Osmanthus fragrans. Acta Horticulturae Sinica (园艺学报), 13,271-275. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	Zhang FC (张福春) (1995). Effect of global warming on plant phenological events in China. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 60,403-408. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Zhu SM (朱盛明) (1982). Stability analysis method and application of related coefficient. Acta Meteorological Sinica (气象学报), 40,497-501. (in Chinese with English abstract)

年份 Year	E₁	E₂	初花日(月.日) The initial flowering (Month.day)	初花日距指标的日数 Days between the index and the initial flowering (d)
1956	9.8		9.14	5
1957	9.5		9.10	4
1958	9.5		9.12	6
1959	9.16		9.25	8
1960	9.8		9.16	7
1961		9.12	9.17	4
1962	9.6		9.12	5
1963	9.21		9.29	7
1964	9.22		9.27	4
1965	9.8		9.14	5
1966	9.10		9.23	12
1967	9.14		9.23	8
1968	9.16		9.21	4
1969	9.11		9.20	8
1970		9.15	9.19	3
1971	9.11		9.24	12
1972		8.24	8.29	3
1973	9.5		9.10	4
1974	8.26		9.1	4
1975	9.22		9.30	7
1976	9.8		9.16	7
1977		9.15	9.17	4
1978	9.12		9.20	7
1979	9.1		9.9	7
1980		8.17	8.24	6
1981	9.5		9.18	12
1982		8.23	8.29	5
1983	8.25		9.1	5
1984		8.20	9.1	11
1999		9.6	9.18	11
2000	9.10		9.15	4
2001	9.20		10.1	11
2002	9.17		9.24	6
2003	9.13		9.20	6

年份 Year	E₁	E₂	初花日(月.日) The initial flowering (Month.day)	初花日距指标的日数 Days between the index and the initial flowering (d)
1956	9.8		9.14	5
1957	9.5		9.10	4
1958	9.5		9.12	6
1959	9.16		9.25	8
1960	9.8		9.16	7
1961		9.12	9.17	4
1962	9.6		9.12	5
1963	9.21		9.29	7
1964	9.22		9.27	4
1965	9.8		9.14	5
1966	9.10		9.23	12
1967	9.14		9.23	8
1968	9.16		9.21	4
1969	9.11		9.20	8
1970		9.15	9.19	3
1971	9.11		9.24	12
1972		8.24	8.29	3
1973	9.5		9.10	4
1974	8.26		9.1	4
1975	9.22		9.30	7
1976	9.8		9.16	7
1977		9.15	9.17	4
1978	9.12		9.20	7
1979	9.1		9.9	7
1980		8.17	8.24	6
1981	9.5		9.18	12
1982		8.23	8.29	5
1983	8.25		9.1	5
1984		8.20	9.1	11
1999		9.6	9.18	11
2000	9.10		9.15	4
2001	9.20		10.1	11
2002	9.17		9.24	6
2003	9.13		9.20	6

年份 Year	L₁	L₂	初花日(月.日) The initial flowering (Month.day)	初花日距指标的日数 Days between the index and the initial flowering (d)
1956	9.27		10.4	6
1957	9.11		9.24	12
1958	9.23		9.28	4
1959	9.26		10.3	6
1960	10.7		10.12	4
1961	10.7		10.12	4
1962	9.28		10.3	4
1963	9.25		10.1	5
1964	9.28		10.5	6
1965	9.15		9.26	10
1966		9.9	9.13	3
1967	9.30		10.13	12
1968	9.23		9.29	5
1969	9.15		9.23	7
1970		9.24	9.27	2
1971	9.20		9.28	7
1972	9.23		10.1	7
1973	9.14		9.20	5
1974	9.19		9.26	6
1975	10.8		10.13	4
1976	9.14		9.26	11
1977	9.22		9.29	6
1978	9.23		9.29	5
1979	9.27		10.4	6
1980	9.18		9.25	6
1981	9.10		9.21	10
1982	9.16		9.27	10
1983	9.29		10.7	7
1984	9.13		9.21	7
1999	9.25		10.3	7
2000	10.4		10.12	7
2001	10.4		10.11	6
2002	9.23		10.6	12
2003	10.2		10.11	8

年份 Year	L₁	L₂	初花日(月.日) The initial flowering (Month.day)	初花日距指标的日数 Days between the index and the initial flowering (d)
1956	9.27		10.4	6
1957	9.11		9.24	12
1958	9.23		9.28	4
1959	9.26		10.3	6
1960	10.7		10.12	4
1961	10.7		10.12	4
1962	9.28		10.3	4
1963	9.25		10.1	5
1964	9.28		10.5	6
1965	9.15		9.26	10
1966		9.9	9.13	3
1967	9.30		10.13	12
1968	9.23		9.29	5
1969	9.15		9.23	7
1970		9.24	9.27	2
1971	9.20		9.28	7
1972	9.23		10.1	7
1973	9.14		9.20	5
1974	9.19		9.26	6
1975	10.8		10.13	4
1976	9.14		9.26	11
1977	9.22		9.29	6
1978	9.23		9.29	5
1979	9.27		10.4	6
1980	9.18		9.25	6
1981	9.10		9.21	10
1982	9.16		9.27	10
1983	9.29		10.7	7
1984	9.13		9.21	7
1999	9.25		10.3	7
2000	10.4		10.12	7
2001	10.4		10.11	6
2002	9.23		10.6	12
2003	10.2		10.11	8

[1]	张琳, 袁伟影, 宋创业, 吴冬秀. 1998-2010年中国典型生态系统长期监测样地环境要素、物种丰富度和生物量动态数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1182-1190.
[2]	范亚冉, 夏少攀, 于冰冰, 朱紫琪, 杨威, 范豫川, 刘晓雨, 张旭辉, 郑聚锋. 大气CO₂浓度升高和增温对土壤有机碳库积累、分子组成和结构稳定性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1053-1069.
[3]	上官瑶瑶, 苏世平, 顾雪丹, 张正中, 赵祜, 李毅, 魏星宇. 红砂幼苗对光周期和光质配比的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 788-800.
[4]	张琨, 钱敏, 汪阳, 李志华, 孔令娜, 李明洋, 马瑾煜, 努尔艾合麦提•玉苏普, 陈乙一, 成沂芮, 张焕仕, 覃凤飞, 渠晖. 紫花苜蓿耐阴性综合评价及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 773-787.
[5]	李欣怡, 张丽芳, 吴友贵, 郭静, 兰荣光, 吕洪飞, 于明坚. 不同海拔高度下百山祖冷杉幼苗的生长特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 610-623.
[6]	葛小彩, 李锦隆, 孙俊, 武盼盼, 胡丹丹, 程栋梁, 钟全林. 武夷山亚高山草甸土壤呼吸组分特征及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 502-512.
[7]	王堃莹, 邱贵福, 刘子赫, 孟君, 刘宇轩, 贾国栋. 气候变化对不同退化程度小叶杨林分生长和内在水分利用效率的调节[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 343-355.
[8]	黄美红, 牛梦秋, 杨鹏飞, 林洁, 廖周瑜, 陈建国, 向建英. 不同温度和埋藏深度对高山垫状植物山生福禄草种子出苗及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 2092-2104.
[9]	贺艺, 周静, 陈宸, 房庭舟, 苏剑, 高浩杰, 曹嘉浩, 杨飞宇, 范淇博, 朱乐瑶, 陈薏名, 杨飞, 王毅腾, 冯雷, 刘飞, 梁爽, 蒋明凯, 陈军, 赵云鹏, 陈伟乐, 赵颖, 黄建国. 浙江海岛濒危树种的保护与恢复[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1583-1599.
[10]	许梦真, 卢正宽, 谭星儒, 王彦兵, 苏天成, 窦山德, 潘庆民, 陈世苹. 呼伦贝尔草甸草原退化特征因子识别与快速诊断指标体系构建[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 42-58.
[11]	张鹏, 焦亮, 薛儒鸿, 魏梦圆, 杜达石, 吴璇, 王旭鸽, 李倩. 干旱强度影响祁连山西段不同海拔青海云杉的生长恢复[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 977-987.
[12]	史倩, 同小娟, 许玲玲, 孟平, 于裴洋, 李俊, 杨铭鑫. 油松早晚材径向生长对气候因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 988-1000.
[13]	钱尼澎, 高浩鑫, 宋超杰, 董淳超, 刘琪璟. 长白山白桦径向生长季节动态及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 1001-1010.
[14]	焦荟颖, 刘立强, 杨佳鑫, 秦伟, 王睿哲. 新疆野苹果自然种群根际固氮菌、解磷菌及解钾菌对叶片养分和生理指标的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(7): 930-942.
[15]	陈以恒, 玉素甫江•如素力, 阿卜杜热合曼•吾斯曼. 2001-2020年天山新疆段草地植被覆盖度时空变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 561-576.