新疆天山中段巴音布鲁克高山草地碳含量及其垂直分布

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0072

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对新疆天山中段巴音布鲁克高山草地(高山草原和高山草甸)的生物量和土壤有机碳进行了测定。结果表明积分和分层两种估算方法得到的土壤有机碳含量没有显著差异,但积分算法的优势在于能推算不同深度的土壤有机碳含量,便于与以往的研究进行比较;高山草甸的生物量和土壤有机碳含量均大于高山草原;其地上生物量分别为71.4和94.9 g C·m^-2,地下生物量分别为1 033.5和1 285.2 g C·m^-2; 1 m深度的土壤有机碳含量分别为25.7和38.8 kg·m^-2;地上生物量呈现较为明显的垂直分布格局,即随着海拔的增加,地上生物量先呈增加趋势,但当海拔超过一定界限后生物量突然下降;土壤含水率是导致南坡(阳坡)土壤有机碳含量空间分异的重要因素,但北坡(阴坡) 土壤有机碳含量还可能与地形、土壤质地等其它因素有关;两种高山草地(高山草原和高山草甸)的根系集中分布在40 cm以内,0~20 cm根系分别占其总量的76%和80%;土壤有机碳集中分布在60 cm以内,0~20 cm土壤有机碳分别占其总量的55%和49%;高山草原根系分布比高山草甸深,但较低的地下/地上比使得其有机碳分布比高山草甸浅。

关键词: 高山草原, 高山草甸, 生物量, 土壤有机碳

Abstract:

Background and Aims Accurate estimates on the size of terrestrial organic carbon stocks are necessary for understanding their importance in regulating atmospheric CO₂ concentrations. In this paper, biomass and SOC contents in alpine grasslands (alpine steppe and alpine meadow) in Bayinbulak were estimated. In addition, the vertical distribution of belowground carbon was discussed. Our objectives were to (a) estimate biomass and SOC contents of two different alpine grasslands, (b) investigate the root distribution of two alpine grasslands, and (c) explore the vertical distribution of SOC of two alpine grasslands.
Methods SOC content was estimated by an improved method (integral arithmetic method). Based on continuous decrease of SOC density with soil depth, integral arithmetic method could estimate SOC content to a given soil depth.
Key Results There were significant differences in the biomass between the alpine steppe and alpine meadow; aboveground biomass of the alpine steppe was 71.4 g C·m^-2, whereas aboveground biomass of the alpine meadow was 94.9 g C·m^-2; belowground biomass of the two alpine grasslands was 1 033.5 and 1 285.2 g C·m^-2, respectively. No significant differences were found between integral arithmetic and traditional methods of estimating SOC contents. SOC contents of the alpine meadow was higher than in the alpine steppe; SOC contents in the two alpine grasslands was 25.7 and 38.8 kg·m^-2, respectively. Most of the root biomass of the two alpine grasslands was in the upper 40 cm of the soil profile, while SOC was concentrated in the top 60 cm. The two alpine grasslands had different root distributions; the percentage of root biomass in the top 20 cm averaged 76%-80% for the alpine steppe and alpine meadow. Alpine meadows had a deeper root profile with only 49% of the SOC in the upper 20 cm, whereas the alpine steppe had 55% of the total SOC in the top 20 cm.
Conclusions This study suggests that vegetation determines the vertical distribution of SOC through root: shoot ratio and its vertical root distribution.

Key words: Alpine steppe, Alpine meadow, Biomass, Soil organic carbon

安尼瓦尔·买买提, 杨元合, 郭兆迪, 方精云. 新疆天山中段巴音布鲁克高山草地碳含量及其垂直分布. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 545-552. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0072

MOHAMMAT Anwar, YANG Yuan-He, GUO Zhao-Di, FANG Jing-Yun. CARBON CONTENTS AND ITS VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION IN ALPINE GRASSLANDS IN BAYINBULAK, MIDDLE STRETCH OF THE TIANSHAN MOUTAINS OF XINJIANG. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(4): 545-552. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0072

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0072

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2006/V30/I4/545

图/表 6

参考文献 33

[1]	Bao SD( 鲍士旦), Jiang RF( 江荣风), Yang CG( 杨超光), Xu GH( 徐国华), Han XR( 韩晓日) (2000). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (土壤农化分析). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[2]	Batjes NH (1996). Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 47, 151-163.
[3]	Erdawlat ( 叶尔道来提), Merey ( 麦来), Adil ( 阿得勒) (1989). Analysis on environmental condition and suitable utilization of grassland in Bayinbulak. Arid Zone Research (干旱区研究), 6(Suppl.), 5-21. (in Chinese)
[4]	Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci LJ (2001). Changes in forest biomass carbon density in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292, 2320-2322. URL PMID
[5]	Fang JY, Liu GH, Xu SL (1996). Soil carbon pool in China and its global significance. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 8, 249-254.
[6]	Garnett MH, Ineson P, Stevenson AC, Howard DC (2001). Terrestrial organic carbon density in a British moorland. Global Change Biology, 7, 375-388.
[7]	Goodale CL, Davidson EA (2002). Uncertain sinks in the shrubs. Nature, 418, 593-594. URL PMID
[8]	He JS, Wang ZQ, Fang JY (2004). Issues and prospects of belowground ecology with special reference to global climate change. Chinese Science Bulletin, 49, 1891-1899.
[9]	Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996). A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia, 108, 389-411. URL PMID
[10]	Jin F ( 金峰), Yang H ( 杨浩), Cai ZC ( 蔡祖聪), Zhao QG ( 赵其国) (2001). Calculation of density and reserve of organic carbon in soils. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 8, 522-528. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000). The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications, 10, 423-436.
[12]	Kern JS (1994). Spatial patterns of soil organic carbon in the contiguous United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59, 1134-1141.
[13]	Li KR, Wang SQ, Cao MK (2003). Vegetation and soil carbon density in China. Science in China, Series D, 33, 72-80.
[14]	Li WH ( 李文华), Zhou XM ( 周兴民) (1998). Ecosystems of Qinghai-Xizang(Tibetan) Plateau and Approach for Their Sustainable Management (青藏高原生态系统及优化利用模式). Guangdong Science & Technology Press, Guangzhou. (in Chinese)
[15]	Li YN ( 李英年), Zhao XQ ( 赵新全), Wang QX ( 王勤学), Gu S ( 古松), Du MY ( 杜明远), Tomomichi K ( 加藤知道), Wang QL ( 王启兰), Zhao L ( 赵亮) (2003). The comparison of community biomass and environmental condition of five vegetation types in alpine meadow of Haibei, Qinghai Province. Journal of Mountain Science (山地学报), 21, 257-264. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Li Z, Zhao QG (2001). Organic carbon content and distribution in soils under different land uses in tropical and subtropical China. Plant and Soil, 231, 175-185.
[17]	Luo TX, Li WH, Zhu HZ (2002). Estimated biomass and productivity of natural vegetation on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Applications, 12, 980-997.
[18]	Myneni RB, Dong J, Tucker CJ, Kaufmann RK, Kauppi PE, Liski J, Zhou L, Alexeyev V, Hughes MK (2001). A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 14784-14789. URL PMID
[19]	Ni J (2004). Forage yield-based carbon density in grasslands of China. Climatic Change, 67, 237-246.
[20]	Pacala SW, Hurtt GC, Baker D, Peylin P, Houghton RA, Birdsey RA, Heath L, Sundquist ET, Stallard RF, Ciais P, Moorcroft P, Caspersen JP, Shevliakova E, Moore B, Kohlmaier G, Holland E, Gloor M, Harmon ME, Fan SM, Sarmiento JL, Goodale CL, Schimel D, Field CB (2001). Consistent land- and atmosphere-based U.S. carbon sink estimates. Science, 292, 2316-2320. DOI URL PMID
[21]	Piao SL ( 朴世龙), Fang JY ( 方精云), He JS ( 贺金生), Xiao Y ( 肖玉) (2004). Spatial distribution of grassland biomass in China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28, 491-498. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG (1982). Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature, 298, 156-159.
[23]	Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002). The biogeography of roots. Ecological Monographs, 72, 311-328.
[24]	Trumbore SE, Grandinski JB (2003). The secret lives of roots. Science, 302, 1344-1345. URL PMID
[25]	Valentini R, Matteucci G, Dolman AJ, Schulze ED, Rebmann C, Moors EJ, Granier A, Gross P, Jensen NO, Pilegaard K, Lindroth A, Grelle A, Bernhofer C, Grunwald T, Aubinet M, Ceulemans R, Kowalski AS, Vesala T, Rannik U, Berbigier P, Loustau D, Guomundsson J, Thorgeirsson H, Ibrom A, Morgenstern K, Clement R, Moncrieff J, Montagnani L, Minerbi S, Jarvis PG (2000). Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature, 404, 861-865. DOI URL PMID
[26]	Wang K ( 王恺), Ma JZ( 马建章), Zhang GL( 张观礼), Liu YK( 刘玉凯), Song CS( 宋朝枢) (2003). National Nature Reserve in China(中国国家级自然保护区). Anhui Science & Technology Press, Hefei. (in Chinese)
[27]	Wang SQ ( 王绍强), Liu JY ( 刘纪远), Yu GR ( 于贵瑞) (2003). Error analysis of estimating terrestrial soil organic carbon density in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 14, 797-802. (in Chinese with English abstract) URL PMID
[28]	Wang SQ ( 王绍强), Zhou CH ( 周成虎) (1999). Estimating soil carbon reservoir of terrestrial ecosystem in China. Geographical Research (地理研究), 18, 349-356. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	Wang SQ ( 王绍强), Zhou CH ( 周成虎), Li KR ( 李克让), Zhu SL ( 朱松丽), Huang FH ( 黄方红) (2000). Analysis on spatial distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon reservoir in China. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 55, 533-544. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Wang SQ, Huang M, Shao XM, Mickler RA, Li KR, Ji JJ (2004). Vertical distribution of soil organic carbon in China. Environmental Management, 33(Suppl.), doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-9130-5. DOI URL PMID
[31]	Wang SQ, Tian HQ, Liu JY, Pan SF (2003). Pattern and change of soil organic carbon density in China: 1960s-1980s. Tellus, 55B, 416-427.
[32]	Wu HB, Guo ZT, Peng CH (2003). Distribution and storage of soil organic carbon in China. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, doi: 10.1029/2001GB001844.
[33]	Zhou GS, Wang YH, Jiang YL, Yang ZY (2002). Estimating biomass and net primary production from forest inventory data: a case study of China's Larix forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 169, 149-157.

样地号 Plot No.	海拔(m) Altitude	坡向 Aspect	群落类型 Community type	生物量 Biomass (g C·m^-2)			土壤有机碳含量 (kg·m^-2) Soil organic carbon content
样地号 Plot No.	海拔(m) Altitude	坡向 Aspect	群落类型 Community type	地上 Shoot	地下 Root		0~30 cm	0~60 cm	0~100 cm
P1	2 470	无No	亚高山草原⁴⁾	58.1		871.3	13.5	19.2	22.1
P2	2 570	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草原⁴⁾	60.4		1 006.6	12.3	15.0	15.7
P3	2 670	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草原⁴⁾	65.6		1 020.7	9.7	11.4	11.8
P4	2 770	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草原⁴⁾	70.3		893.2	12.0	15.7	16.7
P5	2 870	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草原⁴⁾	74.2		777.4	9.8	12.1
P6	2 970	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸化草原⁵⁾	81.7		1 737.6	29.0	37.0	39.5
P7	3 070	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	89.4		1 369.6	27.1	40.3	50.2
P8	3 170	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	99.7		1 060.2	26.3	35.3	37.7
P9	3 270	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	107.1		1 172.8	21.8	32.1	39.4
P10	3 370	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	81.6		1 265.4	16.5	26.7
P11	3 470	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	75.6		1 009.5	15.8	20.0	21.3
P12	2 570	阴坡²⁾	亚高山草甸化草原⁵⁾	89.7		928.0	25.4	38.3	48.4
P13	2 670	阴坡²⁾	亚高山草原化草甸⁷⁾	97.3		1 274.2	19.7	28.3
P14	2 770	半阴坡³⁾	亚高山草原化草甸⁷⁾	94.8		752.6	30.6	35.1	36.1
P15	2 870	半阴坡³⁾	高山草甸⁸⁾	105.5		1 273.5	24.2	37.0	47.5
P16	2 970	半阴坡³⁾	高山草甸⁸⁾	118.4		1 531.1	19.1	25.4	27.7
P17	3 070	半阴坡³⁾	高山草甸⁸⁾	123.9		1 724.6	19.9	32.7
P18	3 170	阴坡²⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	49.5		1 289.9	27.1	39.2	45.6
P19	3 270	阴坡²⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	47.2		876.5	22.8	34.6	44.0
P20	2 460	无No	高山沼泽草甸⁹⁾	143.4		2 107.1	17.7	28.2

样地号 Plot No.	海拔(m) Altitude	坡向 Aspect	群落类型 Community type	生物量 Biomass (g C·m^-2)			土壤有机碳含量 (kg·m^-2) Soil organic carbon content
样地号 Plot No.	海拔(m) Altitude	坡向 Aspect	群落类型 Community type	地上 Shoot	地下 Root		0~30 cm	0~60 cm	0~100 cm
P1	2 470	无No	亚高山草原⁴⁾	58.1		871.3	13.5	19.2	22.1
P2	2 570	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草原⁴⁾	60.4		1 006.6	12.3	15.0	15.7
P3	2 670	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草原⁴⁾	65.6		1 020.7	9.7	11.4	11.8
P4	2 770	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草原⁴⁾	70.3		893.2	12.0	15.7	16.7
P5	2 870	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草原⁴⁾	74.2		777.4	9.8	12.1
P6	2 970	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸化草原⁵⁾	81.7		1 737.6	29.0	37.0	39.5
P7	3 070	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	89.4		1 369.6	27.1	40.3	50.2
P8	3 170	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	99.7		1 060.2	26.3	35.3	37.7
P9	3 270	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	107.1		1 172.8	21.8	32.1	39.4
P10	3 370	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	81.6		1 265.4	16.5	26.7
P11	3 470	阳坡¹⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	75.6		1 009.5	15.8	20.0	21.3
P12	2 570	阴坡²⁾	亚高山草甸化草原⁵⁾	89.7		928.0	25.4	38.3	48.4
P13	2 670	阴坡²⁾	亚高山草原化草甸⁷⁾	97.3		1 274.2	19.7	28.3
P14	2 770	半阴坡³⁾	亚高山草原化草甸⁷⁾	94.8		752.6	30.6	35.1	36.1
P15	2 870	半阴坡³⁾	高山草甸⁸⁾	105.5		1 273.5	24.2	37.0	47.5
P16	2 970	半阴坡³⁾	高山草甸⁸⁾	118.4		1 531.1	19.1	25.4	27.7
P17	3 070	半阴坡³⁾	高山草甸⁸⁾	123.9		1 724.6	19.9	32.7
P18	3 170	阴坡²⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	49.5		1 289.9	27.1	39.2	45.6
P19	3 270	阴坡²⁾	亚高山草甸⁶⁾	47.2		876.5	22.8	34.6	44.0
P20	2 460	无No	高山沼泽草甸⁹⁾	143.4		2 107.1	17.7	28.2