亚热带森林不同菌根真菌树种叶片和细根的碳氮磷化学计量特征

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2024.0374

植物生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 334-343.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0374 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2024.0374

亚热带森林不同菌根真菌树种叶片和细根的碳氮磷化学计量特征

王梦雪¹, 胡明艳¹, 储诚进¹, 陈阳², 罗文启¹, 马子龙¹^,^*()

¹ 中山大学生态学院, 广东深圳 518000
² 中山大学生命科学学院, 广州 510275

收稿日期:2024-10-21 接受日期:2025-01-20 出版日期:2026-02-28 发布日期:2026-04-01
通讯作者: *马子龙 (mazlong@mail.sysu.edu.cn)
基金资助:
广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2022A1515111035);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2023A1515010643);国家自然科学基金(32101272);国家自然科学基金(32330064);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(23lgbj009)

C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics of leaves and fine roots in different mycorrhizal tree species in subtropical forests

WANG Meng-Xue¹, HU Ming-Yan¹, CHU Cheng-Jin¹, CHEN Yang², LUO Wen-Qi¹, MA Zi-Long¹^,^*()

¹ School of Ecology, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China
² School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2024-10-21 Accepted:2025-01-20 Online:2026-02-28 Published:2026-04-01
Contact: *MA Zi-Long (mazlong@mail.sysu.edu.cn)
Supported by:
Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2022A1515111035);Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2023A1515010643);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32101272);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32330064);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(23lgbj009)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

菌根真菌与宿主植物的碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)浓度及C、N、P化学计量特征紧密相关。然而, 亚热带森林中不同菌根真菌树种叶片和细根的C、N、P化学计量特征是否具有显著相关性尚不清楚。该研究依托广东省黑石顶自然保护区森林动态监测样地, 采集81个丛枝菌根(AM)树种和16个外生菌根(ECM)树种的叶片和细根样品并测定其C、N、P浓度, 以期阐明AM和ECM树种叶片和细根的C、N、P化学计量特征有何差异以及AM和ECM树种叶片和细根的C、N、P化学计量比是否协同变化。通过计算Blomberg’s K统计量以检验系统发育信号, 利用线性混合模型检验不同菌根类型树种之间叶片和细根的C、N、P浓度和化学计量比的差异, 利用皮尔逊相关系数检验不同菌根类型树种叶片和细根中C、N、P浓度之间以及化学计量比之间的相关性, 最后利用标准化主轴回归分析不同菌根类型树种叶片和细根之间C、N、P浓度及化学计量比的关系。主要结果: AM树种细根的P浓度高于ECM树种, 但是C:P低于ECM树种。AM和ECM树种叶片和细根的N浓度和P浓度之间, C:N和C:P之间均具有显著正相关关系。AM树种叶片和细根的C、N、P浓度及化学计量比之间都存在显著相关关系, 而ECM树种叶片和细根的N浓度、C:N、N:P之间存在显著相关关系。结果表明菌根真菌定殖会影响植物的化学元素组成及化学计量比, 但是AM和ECM树种叶片和细根间的C、N、P化学计量比都具有显著相关关系。

关键词: 丛枝菌根真菌, 外生菌根真菌, 化学计量比, 叶片, 细根

Abstract:

Aims Mycorrhizal fungi are closely related to the host’s carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) concentrations, and C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics. However, whether the C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics in leaves and fine roots of different mycorrhizal tree species are significantly correlated in subtropical forests remains unclear. This study collected leaf and fine root samples of 81 arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) tree species and 16 ectomycorrhizal (ECM) tree species from the forest dynamic monitoring sample plot in Heishiding Nature Reserve, located in Guangdong Province, and measured their C, N, and P concentrations to clarify the differences of the C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics in leaves and fine roots between AM and ECM tree species, and whether the C, N, P stoichiometric ratio in leaves and fine roots of AM and ECM tree species changes consistently.

Methods We calculated Blomberg’s K statistic to test phylogenetic signals, used the linear mixed model to test the differences in C, N and P concentrations and stoichiometric ratios of leaves and fine roots among different mycorrhizal species, and used the Pearson correlation coefficient to test the correlation between C, N and P concentrations and stoichiometric ratios in leaves and fine roots of different mycorrhizal species. Finally, we used standardised major axis regression to analyze the relationship of C, N and P concentrations and stoichiometric ratios between leaves and fine roots in different mycorrhizal species.

Important findings The P concentration in fine roots of AM species was higher than that of ECM species, but C:P was lower than that of ECM species. There was a significant positive correlation between the N and P concentrations, C:N and C:P in the leaves and fine roots of AM and ECM tree species. There was a significant correlation between the concentrations of C, N and P and stoichiometric ratios of leaves and fine roots in AM species, while there was a significant correlation between N concentration, C:N and N:P of leaves and fine roots in ECM species. The results of this study confirm that the colonization of mycorrhizal fungi affected the chemical element composition and stoichiometric ratio of plants, but the C, N and P stoichiometric ratios between leaves and fine roots in AM and ECM tree species were all significantly correlated.

Key words: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, ectomycorrhizal fungi, stoichiometric ratio, leaf, fine root

王梦雪, 胡明艳, 储诚进, 陈阳, 罗文启, 马子龙. 亚热带森林不同菌根真菌树种叶片和细根的碳氮磷化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 334-343. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0374

WANG Meng-Xue, HU Ming-Yan, CHU Cheng-Jin, CHEN Yang, LUO Wen-Qi, MA Zi-Long. C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics of leaves and fine roots in different mycorrhizal tree species in subtropical forests. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2026, 50(2): 334-343. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0374

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2024.0374

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2026/V50/I2/334

图/表 6

图1 黑石顶自然保护区97个树种的系统发育进化树。其中蓝色为丛枝菌根(AM)树种, 红色为外生菌根(ECM)树种。

Fig. 1 Phylogenetic tree of 97 tree species in Heishiding Nature Reserve. The blue is the arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) species, and the red is the ectomycorrhizae (ECM) species.

表1 用Blomberg’s K统计量估算不同变量的系统发育信号

Table 1 Phylogenetic signals for different variables estimated with Blomberg’s K statistic

变量 Variable	所有树种 All tree species		丛枝菌根树种 AM tree species		外生菌根树种 ECM tree species
变量 Variable	K	p	K	p	K	p
叶片碳浓度 Leaf carbon (C) concentration	0.154	0.001	0.153	0.020	0.241	0.045
叶片氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen (N) concentration	0.220	0.001	0.250	0.001	0.142	0.122
叶片磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus (P) concentration	0.247	0.001	0.268	0.001	0.138	0.043
叶片碳氮比 Leaf C:N	0.230	0.001	0.260	0.001	0.144	0.062
叶片碳磷比 Leaf C:P	0.183	0.001	0.205	0.002	0.109	0.193
叶片氮磷比 Leaf N:P	0.121	0.048	0.133	0.099	0.080	0.367
细根碳浓度 Fine root C concentration	0.101	0.112	0.101	0.250	0.124	0.047
细根氮浓度 Fine root N concentration	0.132	0.017	0.145	0.024	0.077	0.357
细根磷浓度 Fine root P concentration	0.104	0.174	0.094	0.406	0.195	0.069
细根碳氮比 Fine root C:N	0.193	0.001	0.240	0.001	0.091	0.190
细根碳磷比 Fine root C:P	0.175	0.002	0.171	0.013	0.184	0.006
细根氮磷比 Fine root N:P	0.079	0.452	0.084	0.524	0.070	0.632

图2 不同菌根类型树种叶片和细根的碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)浓度及其化学计量比。AM, 丛枝菌根(81个物种); ECM, 外生菌根(16个物种)。“箱子”的上下两端分别表示上四分位数和下四分位数, “箱子”中的横线表示中位数。*, p < 0.05; ns, 不显著(p > 0.05)。

Fig. 2 Carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) concentrations and stoichiometric ratios of leaves and fine roots of different mycorrhizal tree species. AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal (81 species); ECM, ectomycorrhizal (16 species). The upper and lower ends of the “box” represent the upper quartile and the lower quartile, and the horizontal line in the “box” represents the median value. *, p < 0.05; ns, not significant (p > 0.05).

表2 菌根类型和生活型与叶片和细根碳、氮、磷浓度及其化学计量比的线性混合模型结果

Table 2 Results of linear mixed effects model of mycorrhizal type and life form with carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) concentrations and stoichiometric ratios of leaves and fine roots

变量 Variable	菌根类型 Mycorrhizal type		生活型 Life form
变量 Variable	估计值 Estimate	p	估计值 Estimate	p
叶片碳浓度 Leaf C concentration	0.040	0.051	-0.012	0.670
叶片氮浓度 Leaf N concentration	-0.093	0.162	-0.116	0.222
叶片磷浓度 Leaf P concentration	-0.040	0.621	-0.146	0.210
叶片碳氮比 Leaf C:N	0.135	0.055	0.109	0.280
叶片碳磷比 Leaf C:P	0.083	0.310	0.134	0.255
叶片氮磷比 Leaf N:P	-0.051	0.331	0.027	0.714
细根碳浓度 Fine root C concentration	0.019	0.125	-0.016	0.376
细根氮浓度 Fine root N concentration	-0.068	0.385	0.038	0.738
细根磷浓度 Fine root P concentration	-0.135	0.036	0.051	0.573
细根碳氮比 Fine root C:N	0.067	0.392	-0.051	0.653
细根碳磷比 Fine root C:P	0.145	0.033	-0.047	0.626
细根氮磷比 Fine root N:P	0.068	0.331	-0.001	0.993

表3 不同菌根类型树种叶片和细根的碳、氮、磷浓度及化学计量比之间的皮尔逊相关系数(r)

Table 3 Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) concentrations and stoichiometric ratios in leaves and fine roots of different mycorrhizal tree species

相关关系 Correlation relationship	丛枝菌根树种 AM tree species		外生菌根树种 ECM tree species
相关关系 Correlation relationship	叶片 Leaf	细根 Fine root	叶片 Leaf	细根 Fine root
氮浓度—碳浓度 N concentration — C concentration	-0.093	0.087	0.325	-0.139
磷浓度—碳浓度 P concentration — C concentration	-0.063	-0.288^**	0.510^*	-0.270
磷浓度—氮浓度 P concentration — N concentration	0.750^***	0.528^***	0.644^**	0.637^**
碳氮比—碳磷比 C:N — C:P	0.791^***	0.569^***	0.709^**	0.701^**
碳氮比—氮磷比 C:N — N:P	-0.071	-0.566^***	-0.433	-0.595^*
碳磷比—氮磷比 C:P — N:P	0.552^***	0.349^**	0.327	0.153

图3 标准化主轴回归分析不同菌根类型树种叶片和细根碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)浓度及化学计量比之间的关系。Slope表示该组的标准化主轴回归斜率; Slope comparison的p值表示组间斜率差异的显著性检验结果。AM, 丛枝菌根(81个物种); ECM, 外生菌根(16个物种)。实线, p < 0.05; 虚线, 不显著(p > 0.05)。

Fig. 3 Standardised major axis regressions of the relationship of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) concentrations and stoichiometric ratios between leaves and fine roots in different mycorrhizal tree species. Slope denotes the Standardized Major Axis regression slope for that group. p value of slope comparison indicates the statistical significance of the difference in slopes between the different groups. AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal (81 species); ECM, ectomycorrhizal (16 species). Solid line, p < 0.05; dashed line, not significant (p > 0.05).

参考文献 40

[1]	Du E, Terrer C, Pellegrini AFA, Ahlström A, van Lissa CJ, Zhao X, Xia N, Wu X, Jackson RB (2020). Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. Nature Geoscience, 13, 221-226. DOI
[2]	Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Kerkhoff AJ, Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2010). Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. New Phytologist, 186, 593-608. DOI PMID
[3]	Ferlian O, Cesarz S, Craven D, Hines J, Barry KE, Bruelheide H, Buscot F, Haider S, Heklau H, Herrmann S, Kühn P, Pruschitzki U, Schädler M, Wagg C, Weigelt A, et al. (2018). Mycorrhiza in tree diversity-ecosystem function relationships: conceptual framework and experimental implementation. Ecosphere, 9, e02226. DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2226.
[4]	Fritz SA, Purvis A (2010). Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: a new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conservation Biology, 24, 1042-1051. DOI PMID
[5]	Garten CT (1976). Correlations between concentrations of elements in plants. Nature, 261, 686-688. DOI
[6]	Genre A, Lanfranco L, Perotto S, Bonfante P (2020). Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 18, 649-660. DOI
[7]	Guo DL, Xia MX, Wei X, Chang WJ, Liu Y, Wang ZQ (2008). Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytologist, 180, 673-683. DOI PMID
[8]	Guo L, Deng M, Li X, Schmid B, Huang J, Wu Y, Peng Z, Yang L, Liu L (2024). Evolutionary and ecological forces shape nutrient strategies of mycorrhizal woody plants. Ecology Letters, 27, e14330. DOI: 10.1111/ele.14330.
[9]	Güsewell S (2004). N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243-266. DOI PMID
[10]	Jin Y, Qian H (2022). V. PhyloMaker2: an updated and enlarged R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Plant Diversity, 44, 335-339. DOI
[11]	Jing MM, Shi ZY, Gao XS, Gao JK, Wu SW, Xu XF, Xu SX (2023). Fine-root C:N:P stoichiometry and its driving factors are different between arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal plants in China. Agronomy, 13, 2512. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13102512.
[12]	Khan F, Khan S, Fahad S, Faisal S, Hussain S, Ali S, Ali A (2014). Effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on the phenology and yield of maize varieties. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 2582-2590. DOI URL
[13]	Li J, Chen X, Niklas KJ, Sun J, Wang Z, Zhong Q, Hu D, Cheng D (2022). A whole-plant economics spectrum including bark functional traits for 59 subtropical woody plant species. Journal of Ecology, 110, 248-261. DOI URL
[14]	Liang YY, Fan LL, Ma XX, Mao JF, Hui TT, Li YM (2024). Ecological stoichiometry of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in six grassland types in northern Xinjiang. Arid Zone Research, 41, 1708-1718. DOI
	[梁元也, 范连连, 马学喜, 毛洁菲, 惠婷婷, 李耀明 (2024). 新疆北部六种草地类型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征. 干旱区研究, 41, 1708-1718.] DOI
[15]	Liu XY, Hu YK (2020). C:N:P stoichiometry of leaves and fine roots in typical forest swamps of the Greater Hinggan Mountains, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 3385-3394.
	[刘旭艳, 胡宇坤 (2020). 大兴安岭典型森林沼泽植物叶片和细根碳氮磷化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 31, 3385-3394.] DOI
[16]	Lu M, Hedin LO (2019). Global plant-symbiont organization and emergence of biogeochemical cycles resolved by evolution-based trait modelling. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3, 239-250.
[17]	Luo X, Mazer SJ, Guo H, Zhang N, Weiner J, Hu S (2016). Nitrogen:phosphorous supply ratio and allometry in five alpine plant species. Ecology and Evolution, 6, 8881-8892. DOI PMID
[18]	Ma X, Zhu B, Nie Y, Liu Y, Kuzyakov Y (2021). Root and mycorrhizal strategies for nutrient acquisition in forests under nitrogen deposition: a meta-analysis. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 163, 108418. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108418.
[19]	Meng Y, Davison J, Clarke JT, Zobel M, Gerz M, Moora M, Öpik M, Buemo CG (2023). Environmental modulation of plant mycorrhizal traits in the global flora. Ecology Letters, 26, 1862-1876. DOI PMID
[20]	Niklas KJ, Cobb ED (2005). N, P, and C stoichiometry of Eranthis hyemalis (Ranunculaceae) and the allometry of plant growth. American Journal of Botany, 92, 1256-1263. DOI PMID
[21]	Phillips RP, Brzostek E, Midgley MG (2013). The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon-nutrient couplings in temperate forests. New Phytologist, 199, 41-51. DOI PMID
[22]	Read DJ (1991). Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia, 47, 376-391. DOI URL
[23]	Reich PB (2014). The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology, 102, 275-301. DOI URL
[24]	Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11001-11006. DOI PMID
[25]	Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Wright IJ, Niklas KJ, Hedin L, Elser JJ (2010). Evidence of a general 2/3-power law of scaling leaf nitrogen to phosphorus among major plant groups and biomes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 877-883. DOI URL
[26]	Smith SE, Read DJ (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 3rd ed. Academic Press, London.
[27]	Soudzilovskaia NA, Vaessen S, Barcelo M, He J, Rahimlou S, Abarenkov K, Brundrett MC, Gomes SIF, Merckx V, Tedersoo L (2020). FungalRoot: global online database of plant mycorrhizal associations. New Phytologist, 227, 955-966.
[28]	Soudzilovskaia NA, van Bodegom PM, Terrer C, Zelfde MV, McCallum I, Luke McCormack M, Fisher JB, Brundrett MC, de Sá NC, Tedersoo L (2019). Global mycorrhizal plant distribution linked to terrestrial carbon stocks. Nature Communications, 10, 5077. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13019-2.
[29]	Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: the Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[30]	Tian D, Yan Z, Niklas KJ, Han W, Kattge J, Reich PB, Luo Y, Chen Y, Tang Z, Hu H, Wright IJ, Schmid B, Fang J (2018). Global leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry and their scaling exponent. National Science Review, 5, 728-739. DOI URL
[31]	Wardle DA, Walker LR, Bardgett RD (2004). Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science, 305, 509-513. DOI PMID
[32]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, Falster DS, Garnier E, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee W, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Villar R, Warton DI, Westoby M (2005). Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytologist, 166, 485-496. DOI PMID
[33]	Xia CX, Yu D, Wang Z, Xie D (2014). Stoichiometry patterns of leaf carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous in aquatic macrophytes in eastern China. Ecological Engineering, 70, 406-413. DOI URL
[34]	Yang S, Shi ZY, Sun YC, Wang XH, Yang WY, Gao JK, Wang XG (2022a). Stoichiometric ratios of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus of shrub organs vary with mycorrhizal type. Agriculture, 12, 1061. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12071061.
[35]	Yang X, Tang Z, Ji C, Liu H, Ma W, Mohhamot A, Shi Z, Sun W, Wang T, Wang X, Wu X, Yu S, Yue M, Zheng C (2014). Scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus across plant organs in shrubland biomes across Northern China. Scientific Reports, 4, 5448. DOI: 10.1038/srep05448.
[36]	Yang Y, Zhang X, Hartley IP, Dungait JAJ, Wen X, Li D, Guo Z, Quine TA (2022b). Contrasting rhizosphere soil nutrient economy of plants associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal fungi in karst forests. Plant and Soil, 470, 81-93. DOI
[37]	You C, Li J, Yang K, Tan B, Yin R, Li H, Zhang L, Cui X, Liu S, Wang L, Liu Y, Chen L, Yuan Y, Li J, Sardans J, et al. (2023). Variations and patterns of C and N stoichiometry in the first five root branch orders across 218 woody plant species. New Phytologist, 238, 1838-1848. DOI URL
[38]	Zhang J, Zhao N, Liu C, Yang H, Li M, Yu G, Wilcox K, Yu Q, He N (2018a). C:N:P stoichiometry in China’s forests: from organs to ecosystems. Functional Ecology, 32, 50-60. DOI URL
[39]	Zhang JH, He NP, Liu CC, Xu L, Yu Q, Yu GR (2018b). Allocation strategies for nitrogen and phosphorus in forest plants. Oikos, 127, 1506-1514. DOI URL
[40]	Zhao R, Wang CK, Quan XK, Wang XC (2021). Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of different organs of broadleaf tree species in a temperate forest in Maoershan Area, Heilongjiang Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 57(2), 1-11.
	[赵瑞, 王传宽, 全先奎, 王兴昌 (2021). 黑龙江省帽儿山温带阔叶树种不同器官的生态化学计量特征. 林业科学, 57(2), 1-11.]

亚热带森林不同菌根真菌树种叶片和细根的碳氮磷化学计量特征

C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics of leaves and fine roots in different mycorrhizal tree species in subtropical forests

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	饶朝康, 唐亮. 不同潮位红树植物叶际微生物群落特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 1-.
[2]	谭秋颜, 张清, 高程, 褚海燕, 杨腾. 外生菌根真菌: 高寒生态系统碳氮循环的关键驱动者[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 584-599.
[3]	魏莉, 王鹏森, 刘珊, 樊锐, 黄楠, 张建国, 其美拉姆, 苟扬, 刘沫含, 黄婷, 周冀琼. 丛枝菌根真菌对豆禾混播植物垂直生态位养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 760-773.
[4]	周春菡, 熊智诚, 杨明新, 史海兰, 周亚星, 唐玉, 张静, 纪宝明, 代心灵. 黄河源园区高寒湿地菌根真菌群落特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 625-638.
[5]	姜庆宏, 丁露, 王哲, 郑春丽, 冯昭绰. 丛枝菌根真菌与不同功能细菌联用对苜蓿的促生作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 774-788.
[6]	马建辉, 童鑫, 张思榕, 毛子昆, 秦俊, 马克平. 菌根真菌生理生态功能研究进展及展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 498-514.
[7]	王海浪, 付伟, 伍松林, 陈保冬. 丛枝菌根真菌生态功能及群落调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 515-535.
[8]	秦斐斐, 唐朝辉, 司彤, 慈敦伟. 盐碱耐受型和敏感型花生生长发育及根际土壤特性对丛枝菌根真菌的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 742-759.
[9]	邹纪开, 吴佳怡, 谷云懿, 陈宝明. 不同形态氮添加与丛枝菌根真菌对外来入侵植物白花鬼针草竞争力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 722-730.
[10]	何正嘉, 曾歆然, 王琳影, 薛昕宇, 苏钦泽, 李宇, 张寅杰, 吴辉煌, 陈成聪, 吴良泉, 魏安妮, 仇云鹏, 郭梨锦. 茶园丛枝菌根真菌群落和土壤有机碳对镁肥的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 700-709.
[11]	段世龙, 余成瑾, 许心垚, 冯固, 谢贤安, 张林. 植物-丛枝菌根真菌-细菌连续体及其维持机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 600-611.
[12]	江康威, 吕程, 王亚菲, 李宏, 张芷晴, 王雨, 张青青, 吐尔逊娜依•热依木. 放牧干扰下丛枝菌根真菌群落对土壤多功能性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 685-699.
[13]	何堂庆, 王变变, 曹鑫鑫, 张康成, 汪晓东, 王浩, 白彤硕, 赵叶新, 张艺, 王益, 仇云鹏, 胡水金. 半干旱草地植物和丛枝菌根真菌群落对长期降水增加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 674-684.
[14]	李文竹, 栾军伟, 邸雅平, 王一, 聂秀青, 刘世荣. 模拟干旱对暖温带锐齿槲栎林菌根介导下土壤酶活性和土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 660-673.
[15]	冯哲, 许格希, 刘顺, 陈健, 李非凡, 巩闪闪, 贾磊, 孙镇, 余美霓, 史作民, 周庆宏, 蒋冬梅. 生境因子和系统发育协同驱动云南金沙江干热河谷植物叶片化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 352-361.