植物生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 474-488.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2025.0038  cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2025.0038

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    

华南国家植物园24种植物花与叶片功能性状变异

李沁1,2, 贺鹏程1, 叶清1,*()   

  1. 1 中国科学院华南植物园, 广州 510650
    2 江西省林业科技实验中心, 江西赣州 341600
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-26 接受日期:2025-07-09 出版日期:2026-02-28 发布日期:2026-04-01
  • 通讯作者: *叶清(qye@scbg.ac.cn)
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(32371641)

Variation in flower and leaf functional traits of 24 species in South China National Botanical Garden

LI Qin1,2, HE Peng-Cheng1, YE Qing1,*()   

  1. 1 South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
    2 Jiangxi Provincial Forestry Science and Technology Experiment Center, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341600, China
  • Received:2025-01-26 Accepted:2025-07-09 Online:2026-02-28 Published:2026-04-01
  • Contact: *YE Qing (qye@scbg.ac.cn)
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(32371641)

摘要:

植物功能性状是指植物形态、结构、生理等方面的特征, 反映植物对环境变化的响应与适应。花是植物的繁殖器官, 其功能性状表征植物对传粉媒介、传粉者的选择以及繁殖过程的碳投资策略。研究表明, 花是由叶片发育而来的变态器官, 但两者在结构和生理性状上的差异研究较少。为了揭示花和叶片功能性状的差异, 该研究以华南国家植物园的24个物种为研究对象, 分别测定花和叶片的形态性状(大小和厚度)、结构性状(花脉直径与密度、叶脉直径与密度、比花重、比叶重和干物质含量)、机械抗性(穿透力、撕裂力)和生理性状(寿命、呼吸速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度、氮含量和磷含量)。研究发现, 花与叶片碳投资策略存在显著差异。与叶片相比, 花的穿透力、撕裂力和干物质含量为叶片的50.0%、42.9%、30.7%, 且花的蒸腾速率和气孔导度为叶片的73.9%和84.6%。同时, 花大小、花机械抗性均随花脉直径增大而显著增加; 叶片大小与叶片一级脉直径呈显著正相关关系, 叶片机械抗性与叶片末端脉直径呈显著正相关关系。而花寿命与花瓣的呼吸速率、蒸腾速率和气孔导度呈显著负相关关系, 与花机械抗性(即撕裂力和穿透力)、比花重均无显著关系; 而叶片寿命与叶片呼吸速率、机械抗性、比叶重均呈显著正相关关系。该研究通过系统测定花和叶片的功能性状, 探究了植物两类器官结构与功能之间的差异, 揭示了植物在繁殖与生长之间的资源分配权衡, 为国家植物园的物种保护提供科学依据和数据支持。

关键词: 花, 叶片, 形态性状, 结构性状, 机械抗性, 生理性状

Abstract:

Aims Plant functional traits refer to various characteristics of plant morphology, structure, physiology, etc., reflecting plant responses and adaptations to environmental change. Flowers, as the core organs of plant reproduction, possess functional traits that can reflect plant-pollinator interactions, pollinator selection, and carbon investment strategies during the reproductive processes. It has been shown that flowers are developed from leaves, but the differences between flower and leaf functional traits across species remain largely unknown. By systematically quantifying the functional traits of flowers and leaves, this study investigated the differences in structures and functions of these two types of plant organs.

Methods To reveal the differences in functional traits between flowers and leaves, we selected 24 species in South China National Botanical Garden, and measured their both flower and leaf morphological traits (i.e., size and thickness), structural traits (i.e., vein diameter and density, mass per area, and dry mass content), mechanical strength (i.e., force to tear, and force to punch), and physiological traits (i.e., longevity, respiration rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, nitrogen content, and phosphorus content).

Important findings Significant differences were found in the functional traits and carbon investment strategies between flowers and leaves. Force to punch, force to tear, and dry mass content of flowers were 50.0%, 42.9% and 30.7% of leaves. Additionally, the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance of flowers were 73.9% and 84.6% of leaves. Flower size and mechanical strength significantly increased with flower vein diameter, while leaf size was significantly and positively correlated with primary leaf vein diameter. Leaf mechanical strength was significantly and positively correlated with leaf minor vein diameter. Moreover, flower longevity was significantly and negatively correlated with flower respiration rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance, but non-significantly correlated with flower mechanical strength and mass per area. In contrast, leaf longevity was significantly and positively correlated with leaf respiration rate, mechanical strength, and mass per area. Our findings revealed the trade-offs in resource allocation between plant reproduction and growth, and provided data support for species protection in the National Botanical Gardens.

Key words: flower, leaf, morphological trait, structural trait, mechanical strength, physiological trait