植物生态学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 988-997.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00102 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2013.00102
所属专题: 青藏高原植物生态学:植物-土壤-微生物
徐丽1,2,于书霞1,何念鹏2,*(
),温学发2,石培礼2,张扬建2,代景忠3,王若梦2
收稿日期:2013-05-22
接受日期:2013-10-05
出版日期:2013-05-22
发布日期:2013-11-06
基金资助:
XU Li1,2,YU Shu-Xia1,HE Nian-Peng2,*(
),WEN Xue-Fa2,SHI Pei-Li2,ZHANG Yang-Jian2,DAI Jing-Zhong3,WANG Ruo-Meng2
Received:2013-05-22
Accepted:2013-10-05
Online:2013-05-22
Published:2013-11-06
摘要:
青藏高原具有独特的海拔、气候和生态系统类型, 弄清其土壤有机质分解及其温度敏感性对于揭示青藏高原土壤碳储量变化及其碳汇功能具有重要意义。该文利用青藏高原西北部草地的11个封育-自由放牧成对草地, 通过测定不同温度(5、10、15、20和25 ℃)培养下的土壤碳矿化速率, 探讨了土地利用方式对该地区土壤碳矿化及其温度敏感性的影响。实验结果表明: 温度对青藏高原高寒草地的土壤碳矿化具有显著影响, 温度越高土壤碳矿化量越大。从东至西, 土壤碳矿化量逐渐降低。草地土壤碳矿化量与土壤有机碳和土壤全氮含量显著正相关; 即土壤有机碳和土壤全氮含量越高, 土壤碳矿化量就越高。土地利用方式对土壤碳矿化的温度敏感性(Q10)无显著影响, Q10值变化范围为1.4-2.4; 其中, 放牧草地Q10的平均值为1.83, 封育草地Q10的平均值为1.86。此外, Q10与土壤有机碳和土壤全氮含量无显著的相关关系, 也无明显的空间格局。放牧和封育对青藏高原高寒草地土壤碳矿化的温度敏感性无显著影响, 为深入分析青藏高原土壤碳汇功能及其对未来气温升高的响应提供了重要的理论依据。
徐丽,于书霞,何念鹏,温学发,石培礼,张扬建,代景忠,王若梦. 青藏高原高寒草地土壤碳矿化及其温度敏感性. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(11): 988-997. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00102
XU Li,YU Shu-Xia,HE Nian-Peng,WEN Xue-Fa,SHI Pei-Li,ZHANG Yang-Jian,DAI Jing-Zhong,WANG Ruo-Meng. Soil C mineralization and temperature sensitivity in alpine grasslands of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(11): 988-997. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00102
| 实验样点 Experimental site | 封育草地 Fenced grassland (FG) | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland (GG) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | ||
| 样点1 Site 1 | 91.973 1° | 31.383 5° | 91.962 4° | 31.376 4° | |
| 样点2 Site 2 | 91.723 8° | 31.619 2° | 91.719 8° | 31.608 2° | |
| 样点3 Site 3 | 91.907 8° | 32.302 9° | 91.910 5° | 32.305 0° | |
| 样点4 Site 4 | 90.459 8° | 31.364 4° | 90.399 0° | 31.374 5° | |
| 样点5 Site 5 | 90.055 3° | 31.497 4° | 90.055 6° | 31.497 8° | |
| 样点6 Site 6 | 90.244 1° | 31.391 1° | 90.244 4° | 31.391 4° | |
| 样点7 Site 7 | 86.653 3° | 32.337 9° | 86.653 6° | 32.338 2° | |
| 样点8 Site 8 | 86.796 9° | 31.752 9° | 86.797 2° | 31.753 2° | |
| 样点9 Site 9 | 85.839 5° | 31.924 6° | 85.840 0° | 31.924 9° | |
| 样点10 Site 10 | 82.910 0° | 32.380 9° | 82.910 6° | 32.381 2° | |
| 样点11 Site 11 | 81.828 2° | 32.074 8° | 81.828 4° | 32.075 3° | |
表1 实验样点的地理位置
Table 1 Geographical locations of experimental sites
| 实验样点 Experimental site | 封育草地 Fenced grassland (FG) | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland (GG) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | ||
| 样点1 Site 1 | 91.973 1° | 31.383 5° | 91.962 4° | 31.376 4° | |
| 样点2 Site 2 | 91.723 8° | 31.619 2° | 91.719 8° | 31.608 2° | |
| 样点3 Site 3 | 91.907 8° | 32.302 9° | 91.910 5° | 32.305 0° | |
| 样点4 Site 4 | 90.459 8° | 31.364 4° | 90.399 0° | 31.374 5° | |
| 样点5 Site 5 | 90.055 3° | 31.497 4° | 90.055 6° | 31.497 8° | |
| 样点6 Site 6 | 90.244 1° | 31.391 1° | 90.244 4° | 31.391 4° | |
| 样点7 Site 7 | 86.653 3° | 32.337 9° | 86.653 6° | 32.338 2° | |
| 样点8 Site 8 | 86.796 9° | 31.752 9° | 86.797 2° | 31.753 2° | |
| 样点9 Site 9 | 85.839 5° | 31.924 6° | 85.840 0° | 31.924 9° | |
| 样点10 Site 10 | 82.910 0° | 32.380 9° | 82.910 6° | 32.381 2° | |
| 样点11 Site 11 | 81.828 2° | 32.074 8° | 81.828 4° | 32.075 3° | |
| 实验样点 Experimental site | 优势植被 Dominant vegetation | 土地利用方式 Land-use type | 有机碳含量 Organic carbon content (g·kg-1) | 全氮含量 Total nitrogen content (g·kg-1) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 样点1 Site 1 | 高山嵩草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 19.04 ± 0.04a | 1.52 ± 0.02a | 8.04 ± 0.12a |
| Kobresia pygmaea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 10.30 ± 0.01b | 0.94 ± 0.01b | 8.33 ± 0.36a | |
| 样点2 Site 2 | 高山嵩草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 24.42 ± 0.08a | 1.91 ± 0.03a | 8.56 ± 0.52a |
| K. pygmaea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 13.31 ± 0.02b | 1.21 ± 0.08b | 7.77 ± 0.48a | |
| 样点3 Site 3 | 高山嵩草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 11.76 ± 0.01a | 1.05 ± 0.00a | 8.43 ± 0.05a |
| K. pygmaea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 11.12 ± 0.01b | 1.13 ± 0.01b | 7.78 ± 0.41a | |
| 样点4 Site 4 | 紫花针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 12.27 ± 0.03a | 1.18 ± 0.03a | 7.79 ± 0.57a |
| Stipa purpurea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 10.23 ± 0.01b | 1.09 ± 0.03b | 8.38 ± 0.19a | |
| 样点5 Site 5 | 紫花针茅和羊草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 10.31 ± 0.09a | 1.04 ± 0.04a | 9.07 ± 0.02a |
| S. purpurea and Leymus chinensis | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 8.92 ± 0.07a | 1.14 ± 0.05b | 8.53 ± 0.55a | |
| 样点6 Site 6 | 紫花针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 8.96 ± 0.06a | 0.97 ± 0.01a | 7.83 ± 0.30a |
| S. purpurea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 12.17 ± 0.03b | 1.21 ± 0.03b | 8.33 ± 0.22a | |
| 样点7 Site 7 | 紫花针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 6.40 ± 0.16a | 0.71 ± 0.04a | 9.94 ± 0.01a |
| S. purpurea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 3.95 ± 0.06b | 0.70 ± 0.03a | 10.09 ± 0.02b | |
| 样点8 Site 8 | 紫花针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 13.36 ± 0.13a | 2.14 ± 0.05a | 8.73 ± 0.03a |
| S. purpurea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 10.14 ± 0.13b | 1.39 ± 0.08b | 8.53 ± 0.03b | |
| 样点9 Site 9 | 紫花针茅和薹草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 6.70 ± 0.31a | 0.99 ± 0.03a | 9.28 ± 0.03a |
| S. purpurea and Carex moorcroftii | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 6.91 ± 0.10a | 1.03 ± 0.09a | 8.94 ± 0.04b | |
| 样点10 Site 10 | 沙生针茅和羽状针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 17.40 ± 0.13a | 1.23 ± 0.05a | 8.62 ± 0.09a |
| S. purpurea and S. pennata | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 11.89 ± 0.16b | 0.94 ± 0.02b | 8.82 ± 0.03b | |
| 样点11 Site 11 | 沙生针茅和羽状针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 3.76 ± 0.31a | 0.59 ± 0.06a | 9.12 ± 0.01a |
| S. purpurea and S. pennata | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 6.55 ± 0.17a | 0.79 ± 0.06b | 9.05 ± 0.03b |
表2 实验样地的优势植被和土壤特征(平均值±标准偏差, n = 4)
Table 2 The dominant vegetation and soil properties on experimental sites (mean ± SD, n = 4)
| 实验样点 Experimental site | 优势植被 Dominant vegetation | 土地利用方式 Land-use type | 有机碳含量 Organic carbon content (g·kg-1) | 全氮含量 Total nitrogen content (g·kg-1) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 样点1 Site 1 | 高山嵩草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 19.04 ± 0.04a | 1.52 ± 0.02a | 8.04 ± 0.12a |
| Kobresia pygmaea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 10.30 ± 0.01b | 0.94 ± 0.01b | 8.33 ± 0.36a | |
| 样点2 Site 2 | 高山嵩草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 24.42 ± 0.08a | 1.91 ± 0.03a | 8.56 ± 0.52a |
| K. pygmaea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 13.31 ± 0.02b | 1.21 ± 0.08b | 7.77 ± 0.48a | |
| 样点3 Site 3 | 高山嵩草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 11.76 ± 0.01a | 1.05 ± 0.00a | 8.43 ± 0.05a |
| K. pygmaea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 11.12 ± 0.01b | 1.13 ± 0.01b | 7.78 ± 0.41a | |
| 样点4 Site 4 | 紫花针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 12.27 ± 0.03a | 1.18 ± 0.03a | 7.79 ± 0.57a |
| Stipa purpurea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 10.23 ± 0.01b | 1.09 ± 0.03b | 8.38 ± 0.19a | |
| 样点5 Site 5 | 紫花针茅和羊草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 10.31 ± 0.09a | 1.04 ± 0.04a | 9.07 ± 0.02a |
| S. purpurea and Leymus chinensis | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 8.92 ± 0.07a | 1.14 ± 0.05b | 8.53 ± 0.55a | |
| 样点6 Site 6 | 紫花针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 8.96 ± 0.06a | 0.97 ± 0.01a | 7.83 ± 0.30a |
| S. purpurea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 12.17 ± 0.03b | 1.21 ± 0.03b | 8.33 ± 0.22a | |
| 样点7 Site 7 | 紫花针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 6.40 ± 0.16a | 0.71 ± 0.04a | 9.94 ± 0.01a |
| S. purpurea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 3.95 ± 0.06b | 0.70 ± 0.03a | 10.09 ± 0.02b | |
| 样点8 Site 8 | 紫花针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 13.36 ± 0.13a | 2.14 ± 0.05a | 8.73 ± 0.03a |
| S. purpurea | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 10.14 ± 0.13b | 1.39 ± 0.08b | 8.53 ± 0.03b | |
| 样点9 Site 9 | 紫花针茅和薹草 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 6.70 ± 0.31a | 0.99 ± 0.03a | 9.28 ± 0.03a |
| S. purpurea and Carex moorcroftii | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 6.91 ± 0.10a | 1.03 ± 0.09a | 8.94 ± 0.04b | |
| 样点10 Site 10 | 沙生针茅和羽状针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 17.40 ± 0.13a | 1.23 ± 0.05a | 8.62 ± 0.09a |
| S. purpurea and S. pennata | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 11.89 ± 0.16b | 0.94 ± 0.02b | 8.82 ± 0.03b | |
| 样点11 Site 11 | 沙生针茅和羽状针茅 | 封育草地 Fenced grassland | 3.76 ± 0.31a | 0.59 ± 0.06a | 9.12 ± 0.01a |
| S. purpurea and S. pennata | 自由放牧草地 Grazing grassland | 6.55 ± 0.17a | 0.79 ± 0.06b | 9.05 ± 0.03b |
| 样点 Site | 培养7天 | 培养56天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation for 7 d | Incubation for 56 d | ||||
| D 值 | p值 | D 值 | p值 | ||
| D value | p value | D value | p value | ||
| (μg C·g-1 soil) | (μg C·g-1 soil) | ||||
| 样点1 Site 1 | 25.92 | 0.023 | 148.99 | 0.012 | |
| 样点2 Site 2 | 39.38 | 0.02 | 218.41 | 0.018 | |
| 样点3 Site 3 | -0.63 | 0.8 | -41.79 | 0.091 | |
| 样点4 Site 4 | 7.68 | 0.008 | 50.23 | 0.011 | |
| 样点5 Site 5 | 9.96 | 0.003 | 70.45 | 0.006 | |
| 样点6 Site 6 | -9.81 | 0.01 | -85.59 | 0.003 | |
| 样点7 Site 7 | 1.7 | 0.047 | 31.94 | 0.123 | |
| 样点8 Site 8 | 3.75 | 0.325 | 69.53 | 0.005 | |
| 样点9 Site 9 | 5.75 | 0.064 | 58.81 | 0.009 | |
| 样点10 Site 10 | 15.86 | 0 | 63.21 | 0.009 | |
| 样点11 Site 11 | -8.36 | 0.024 | -80.58 | 0.012 | |
表3 实验样点间土壤碳矿化差异性比较
Table 3 Comparison of soil C mineralization across experimental sites
| 样点 Site | 培养7天 | 培养56天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation for 7 d | Incubation for 56 d | ||||
| D 值 | p值 | D 值 | p值 | ||
| D value | p value | D value | p value | ||
| (μg C·g-1 soil) | (μg C·g-1 soil) | ||||
| 样点1 Site 1 | 25.92 | 0.023 | 148.99 | 0.012 | |
| 样点2 Site 2 | 39.38 | 0.02 | 218.41 | 0.018 | |
| 样点3 Site 3 | -0.63 | 0.8 | -41.79 | 0.091 | |
| 样点4 Site 4 | 7.68 | 0.008 | 50.23 | 0.011 | |
| 样点5 Site 5 | 9.96 | 0.003 | 70.45 | 0.006 | |
| 样点6 Site 6 | -9.81 | 0.01 | -85.59 | 0.003 | |
| 样点7 Site 7 | 1.7 | 0.047 | 31.94 | 0.123 | |
| 样点8 Site 8 | 3.75 | 0.325 | 69.53 | 0.005 | |
| 样点9 Site 9 | 5.75 | 0.064 | 58.81 | 0.009 | |
| 样点10 Site 10 | 15.86 | 0 | 63.21 | 0.009 | |
| 样点11 Site 11 | -8.36 | 0.024 | -80.58 | 0.012 | |
| 源 Source | 培养7天的土壤碳矿化累积量 Accumulative soil C mineralization over a 7-day duration | 培养56天的土壤碳矿化累积量 Accumulative soil C mineralization over a 56-day duration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F值 F value | p值 p value | F值 F value | p值 p value | ||
| 土地利用方式 Land use type (L) | 24.086 | <0.000 1 | 19.695 | <0.000 1 | |
| 温度 Temperature (T) | 138.987 | <0.000 1 | 112.975 | <0.000 1 | |
| L × T | 1.282 | 0.276 | 0.763 | 0.550 | |
表4 土地利用方式和培养温度对土壤碳矿化的影响
Table 4 Effects of land use type and incubation temperature on the accumulative soil C mineralization
| 源 Source | 培养7天的土壤碳矿化累积量 Accumulative soil C mineralization over a 7-day duration | 培养56天的土壤碳矿化累积量 Accumulative soil C mineralization over a 56-day duration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F值 F value | p值 p value | F值 F value | p值 p value | ||
| 土地利用方式 Land use type (L) | 24.086 | <0.000 1 | 19.695 | <0.000 1 | |
| 温度 Temperature (T) | 138.987 | <0.000 1 | 112.975 | <0.000 1 | |
| L × T | 1.282 | 0.276 | 0.763 | 0.550 | |
图2 土壤碳矿化与土壤有机碳含量、总氮含量、植物地上生物量的关系。
Fig. 2 Relationships of soil C mineralization with soil organic carbon content (SOC), soil total nitrogen content (STN) and aboveground biomass of plants.
图4 温度敏感性(Q10)与土壤有机碳含量、总氮含量以及植物地上生物量间的关系。
Fig. 4 Relationships of temperature sensitivity (Q10) with soil organic carbon content (SOC), soil total nitrogen content (STN) and aboveground biomass of plants.
| [1] | Ai L, Wu JG, Zhu G, Liu JQ, Tian ZQ, Chang W, Xia X (2007). The mineralization of alpine meadow soil organic carbon and factors influencing it in the Qilian Mountain. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 16(5), 22-33. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 艾丽, 吴建国, 朱高, 刘建泉, 田自强, 苌伟, 夏新 (2007). 祁连山中部高山草甸土壤有机碳矿化及其影响因素研究. 草业学报, 16(5), 22-33.] | |
| [2] |
Arevalo C, Chang SX, Bhatti JS, Sidder D (2012). Mineralization potential and temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon under different land uses in the Parkland Region of Alberta, Canada. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76, 241-251.
DOI URL |
| [3] | Bai JB, Xu XL, Song MH, He YT, Jiang J, Shi PL (2011). Effects of temperature and added nitrogen on carbon mineralization in alpine soils on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 20, 855-859. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 白洁冰, 许兴良, 宋明华, 何永涛, 蒋婧, 石培礼 (2007). 温度和氮素输入对青藏高原三种高寒草地土壤碳矿化的影响. 生态环境学报, 20, 855-859.] | |
| [4] |
Chatterjee A, Vance GF, Pendall E, Stahl PD (2008). Timber harvesting alters soil carbon mineralization and microbial community structure in coniferous forests. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 40, 1901-1907.
DOI URL |
| [5] | Chen QS, Li LH, Han XG, Dong YS, Wang ZP, Xiong XG, Yan ZD (2004a). Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming. Acta Ecological Sinica, 24, 2649-2655. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 陈全胜, 李凌浩, 韩兴国, 董云社, 王智平, 熊小刚, 阎志丹 (2004a. 土壤呼吸对温度升高的适应. 生态学报, 24, 2649-2655.] | |
| [6] | Chen QS, Li LH, Han XG, Yan ZD, Wang YF, Zhang Y, Xiong XG, Chen SP, Zhang LX, Gao YZ, Tang F, Yang J, Dong YS (2004b). Temperature sensitivity of soil respira- tion in relation to soil moisture in 11 communities of typical temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24, 831-836. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 陈全胜, 李凌浩, 韩兴国, 阎志丹, 王艳芬, 张焱, 熊小刚, 陈世苹, 张丽霞, 高英志, 唐芳, 杨晶, 董云社 (2004b). 典型温带草原群落土壤呼吸温度敏感性与土壤水分的关系. 生态学报, 24, 831-836.] | |
| [7] |
Conant RT, Ryan MG, Ågren GI, Birge HE, Davidson EA, Eliasson PE, Evans SE, Frey SD, Giardina CP, Hopkins FM, Hyvönen R, Kirschbaum MUF, Lavallee JM, Leifeld J, Parton WJ, Steinweg JM, Wallenstein MD, Wetterstedt JAM, Bradford MA (2011). Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates―synthesis of current know- ledge and a way forward. Global Change Biology, 17, 3392-3404.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Dai JZ, Wei ZJ, He NP, Wang RM, Wen XH, Zhang YH, Zhao XN, Yu GR (2012). Effect of grazing enclosure on the priming effect and temperature sensitivity of soil C mineralization in Leymus chinensis grasslands, Inner Mongolia, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 1226-1236. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[ 代景忠, 卫智军, 何念鹏, 王若梦, 温学华, 张云海, 赵小宁, 于贵瑞 (2012). 封育对羊草草地土壤碳矿化激发效应和温度敏感性的影响. 植物生态学报, 36, 1226-1236.]
DOI URL |
|
| [9] | Fan ZP, Wang H, Deng DZ, Sun XK, Gao JG, Zeng DH (2008). Measurement methods of soil heterotrophic respiration and key factors affecting the temperature sensitivity of the soil heterotrophic respiration. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 27, 1221-1226. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 范志平, 王红, 邓东周, 孙学凯, 高俊刚, 曾德慧 (2008). 土壤异养呼吸的测定及其温度敏感性影响因子. 生态学杂志, 27, 1221-1226.] | |
| [10] |
Frank AB, Liebig MA, Hanson JD (2002). Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in northern semiarid grasslands. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 34, 1235-1241.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
Gao QZ, Li YE, Lin ED, Jiangcun WZ, Wan YF, Xiong W, Wang BS, Li WF (2005). Temporal and spatial distribution of grassland degradation in Northern Tibet. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60, 87-95. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[ 高清竹, 李玉娥, 林而达, 江村旺扎, 万运帆, 熊伟, 王宝山, 李文福 (2005). 藏北地区草地退化的时空分布特征. 地理学报, 60, 87-95.]
DOI URL |
|
| [12] |
Gershenson A, Bader NE, Cheng WX (2009). Effects of substrate availability on the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition. Global Change Biology, 15, 176-183.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Hashimoto S, Tanaka N, Suzuki M, Inoue A, Takizawa H, Kosaka I, Tanaka K, Tantasirin C, Tangtham N (2004). Soil respiration and soil CO2 concentration in a tropical forest, Thailand. Journal of Forest Research, 9, 75-79.
DOI URL |
| [14] | IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007). Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL eds. Climatic Change in 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. |
| [15] |
Jenkinson D, Adams D, Wild A (1991). Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming. Nature, 351, 304-306.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Lal R (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304, 1623-1627.
DOI URL PMID |
| [17] | Liao Y, Yang ZF, Xia XQ, Jiang HC (2011). Research on temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and different active organic carbon fractions of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau permafrost. Earth Science Frontiers, 18, 85-93. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 廖艳, 杨忠芳, 夏学齐, 蒋宏忱 (2011). 青藏高原冻土土壤呼吸温度敏感性和不同活性有机碳组分研究. 地学前缘, 18, 85-93.] | |
| [18] | Liu SH, Fang JY (1997). Effect factors of soil respiration and the temperatures effects on soil respiration in the global scale. Acta Ecological Sinica, 17, 19-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 刘绍辉, 方精云 (1997). 土壤呼吸的影响因素及全球尺度下温度的影响. 生态学报, 17, 19-26.] | |
| [19] | Liu YP, Tang YP, Lu Q, Gao R (2011). Effects of temperature and land use change on soil organic carbon mineralization. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 39, 3896-3927. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 刘燕萍, 唐英平, 卢茜, 高人 (2011). 温度和土地利用变化对土壤有机碳矿化的影响. 安徽农业科学, 39, 3896-3927.] | |
| [20] |
Luan JW, Xiang CH, Luo ZS, Gong YB (2006). Research advances in forest soil respiration. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 2451-2456.
URL PMID |
|
[ 栾军伟, 向成华, 骆宗诗, 宫渊波 (2006). 森林土壤呼吸研究进展. 应用生态学报, 17, 2451-2456.]
URL PMID |
|
| [21] |
Mahecha MD, Reichstein M, Carvalhais N, Lasslop G, Lange H, Seneviratne SI, Vargas R, Ammann C, Arain MA, Cescatti A, Janssens IA, Migliavacca M, Montagnani L, Richardson AD (2010). Global convergence in the temperature sensitivity of respiration at ecosystem level. Science, 329, 838-840.
URL PMID |
| [22] | Qiao CL, Li JM, Wang JH, Ge SD, Zhao L, Xu SX (2012). Advances on carbon dioxide fluxes of alpine meadow ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 29, 204-210. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 乔春连, 李婧梅, 王基恒, 葛世栋, 赵亮, 徐世晓 (2012). 青藏高原高寒草甸生态系统CO2通量研究进展. 草业科学, 29, 204-210.] | |
| [23] |
Ryan MG, Law BE (2005). Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration. Biogeochemistry, 73, 3-27.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
Sierra CA (2012). Temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in the Arrhenius equation: some theoretical considerations. Biogeochemistry, 108, 1-15.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
Vanhala P, Karhu K, Tuomi M, Bjorklof K, Fritze H, Liski J (2008). Temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition in southern and northern areas of the boreal forest zone. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 40, 1758-1764.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
von Lützow M, Kögel-Knabner I (2009). Temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition―What do we know? Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46, 1-15.
DOI URL |
| [27] | Wang GX, Cheng GD, Shen YP (2002). Soil organic carbon pool of grasslands on the Tibetan plateau and its global implication. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 24, 693-700. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 王根绪, 程国栋, 沈永平 (2002). 青藏高原草地土壤有机碳库及其全球意义. 冰川冻土, 24, 693-700.] | |
| [28] | Wang QK, Wang SL, Yu XJ, Zhang J, Liu YX (2007). Soil carbon mineralization potential and its effect on soil active organic carbon in evergreen broadleaved forest and Chinese fir plantation. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26, 1918-1923. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 王清奎, 汪思龙, 于小军, 张剑, 刘燕新 (2007). 常绿阔叶林与杉木林的土壤碳矿化潜力及其对土壤活性有机碳的影响. 生态学杂志, 26, 1918-1923.] | |
| [29] | Wang RM, Dong KH, He NP, Zhu JX, Dai JZ, Shi KK (2013). Effect of enclosure on soil C mineralization and priming effect in Stipa grandis grassland of Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecological Sinica, 33, 3622-3629. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 王若梦, 董宽虎, 何念鹏, 朱剑兴, 代景忠, 施侃侃 (2013). 围封对内蒙古大针茅草地土壤碳矿化及其激发效应的影响. 生态学报, 33, 3622-3629. | |
| [30] |
Wetterstedt JÅM, Persson T, Ågren GI (2010). Temperature sensitivity and substrate quality in soil organic matter decomposition: results of an incubation study with three substrates. Global Change Biology, 16, 1806-1819.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
Wu HB, Guo ZG, Peng CH (2003). Land use induced changes of organic carbon storage in soils of China. Global Change Biology, 9, 305-315.
DOI URL |
| [32] | Wu JG, Ai L, Chang W (2007). Soil organic carbon mineralization and its affecting factors under four typical vegetations in mid Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26, 1703-1711. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 吴建国, 艾丽, 苌伟 (2007). 祁连山中部四种典型生态系统土壤有机碳矿化及其影响因素. 生态学杂志, 26, 1703-1711.] | |
| [33] | Yang K, Gao QZ, Li YE, Lin ED, Sheng WP, Jiangcun WZ, Wang BS, Li WF (2007). Spatial distribution of grassland degradation and trend in northern Tibet. Advances in Earth Science, 22, 410-416. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 杨凯, 高清竹, 李玉娥, 林而达, 盛文萍, 江村旺扎, 王宝山, 李文福 (2007). 藏北地区草地退化空间特征及其趋势分析. 地球科学进展, 22, 410-416.] | |
| [34] |
Yang Y, Huang M, Liu HS, Liu HJ (2011). The interrelation between temperature sensitivity and adaptability of soil respiration. Journal of Natural Resources, 26, 1811-1820. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[ 杨毅, 黄玫, 刘洪升, 刘华杰 (2011). 土壤呼吸的温度敏感性和适应性研究进展. 自然资源学报, 26, 1811-1820.]
DOI URL |
|
| [35] | Zhang JB, Song CC, Yang WY (2005). Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and its effecting factors in the different land use. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 25, 1537-1542. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 张金波, 宋长春, 杨文燕 (2005). 不同土地利用下土壤呼吸温度敏感性差异及影响因素分析. 环境科学学报, 25, 1537-1542.] | |
| [36] |
Zhou JZ, Xue K, Xie JP, Deng Y, Wu LY, Cheng XH, Fei SF, Deng SP, He ZL, van Nostrand JD, Luo YQ (2012). Microbial mediation of carbon-cycle feedbacks to climate warming. Nature Climate Change, 2, 106-110.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 张安宁, 肖亚宁, 赵霞, 张淼, 崔瀚文, 陈书燕, 安黎哲. 青藏高原灌木化与氮添加对土壤线虫及功能性状的交互作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [2] | 刘影, 李疆枫, 吴佳琪, 王艺帆, 尹清琳, 王静. 干旱下草地植物糙隐子草根系和菌根真菌对土壤碳氮的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1388-1398. |
| [3] | 陈龙, 郭柯, 勾晓华, 赵秀海, 马泓若. 祁连圆柏林群落组成及特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 852-864. |
| [4] | 刘新月, 王立平, 刘春和, 孙艳丽, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山, 钱多. 北京不同林龄人工林生物量空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 939-951. |
| [5] | 王世松, 曲孝云, 董劭琼, 李佳鸿, 杨琦, 侯满福, 赵利清, 郭柯, 刘长成, 胥晓. 西藏札达典型荒漠植被类型及群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 801-812. |
| [6] | 王娟, 张登山, 肖元明, 裴全帮, 王博, 樊博, 周国英. 长期围封后高寒草原植物根系分泌物特征与环境因子关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 596-609. |
| [7] | 葛小彩, 李锦隆, 孙俊, 武盼盼, 胡丹丹, 程栋梁, 钟全林. 武夷山亚高山草甸土壤呼吸组分特征及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 502-512. |
| [8] | 李博文, 周阳, 吕静雅, 阿旺, 陈兰英, 刘世章, 伍晶, 吕汪汪, 孙建平, 贾跃凤, 赵矿, 汪诗平. 山脚基带调查低估了青藏高原山地物种丰富度: 以珠峰绒布河流域山体垂直带为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 404-414. |
| [9] | 王惺琪, 范宇阳, 张维琛, 王博杰. 基于生态系统服务和景观形态的浑善达克沙地生态安全格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 2030-2042. |
| [10] | 李晓花, 刘杰, 李丹丹, 张乐华. 濒危植物小溪洞杜鹃种群结构与动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1844-1857. |
| [11] | 陈诚智, 高钰森, 罗力嘉, 王东. 川西高寒窄叶鲜卑花灌丛凋落枝和凋落叶生产与分解[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1733-1743. |
| [12] | 王麟, 李雪, 王愉, 王新, 胡小文, 杨梅, 朱剑霄. 不同配方种衣剂对高寒草地乡土草种种子生长与建植的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 118-128. |
| [13] | 王雯莹, 肖元明, 王小赟, 徐嘉昕, 马玉花, 李强峰, 周国英. 多功能群物种配置模式下退化高寒草甸植物多样性与生态系统多功能性的关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 103-117. |
| [14] | 张辉, 赵赟鹏, 刘晓琛, 郭增鹏, 胡国瑞, 冯彦皓, 马妙君. 高寒草甸退化过程中土壤种子库的变化及其在植物群落更新中的潜在作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 74-82. |
| [15] | 陈炫铮, 朱耀军, 高居娟, 刘一凡, 王荣, 方涛, 罗芳丽, 薛伟, 于飞海. 植物-土壤反馈时空变异研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 955-966. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19